Name :
Date :
1. Why is Article 1 of the Serbian Constitution seen as a strategic constitutional tool for
EU accession?
Answer: Because it vaguely references "European principles and values", it acts as a
flexible placeholder that aligns Serbia with EU norms without committing to specifics.
This gives Serbia room to interpret European values as politically expedient while
avoiding contentious reforms prematurely.
2. What legitimacy issues surrounded the adoption of Serbia's 2006 Constitution?
Answer: It was rushed through in a politically sensitive climate, following
Montenegro’s secession and amidst unresolved status of Kosovo. The Venice
Commission criticized the lack of public debate, suggesting a procedural legitimacy
deficit that casts doubt on the document’s foundational authority.
3. Why are the 2022 judicial reforms in Serbia considered insufficient?
Answer: They improved parts of the judiciary, but failed to address key European
Commission and Venice Commission demands—especially the need for qualified
majority voting and anti-deadlock mechanisms in Constitutional Court appointments.
4. How does the absence of an integration clause impact Serbia’s EU prospects?
Answer: It shows a deliberate reluctance to legally bind Serbia to the EU integration
process. While politically strategic, it delays essential alignment and reflects an
ambiguous commitment to EU values.
5. Why is Article 102 problematic in democratic terms?
Answer: By allowing MPs to return their mandate to the political party, it
institutionalizes party control over individual representatives, which violates
international standards on democratic representation.
6. What are the legal challenges in amending the Serbian Constitution for EU alignment?
Answer: Article 203 requires referenda for many types of changes—approximately
two-thirds of the constitutional content—making the reform process rigid and
politically vulnerable.
7. How does the issue of Kosovo challenge constitutional reform?
Answer: Constitutionalizing agreements like Brussels and Ohrid would require Serbia
to formally redefine its relationship with Kosovo—politically explosive and legally
transformative, with unpredictable consequences.
