Business Law and Management
LAW 480 - Business Law
Arizona State University
April 2, 2024
Case 1
The corporate structure requires that a corporation has shareholders who
elect the Board of directors who, in turn, appoint the CEO, Secretary, and
CFO (Miller, 2018, pp.375-377). Annually the Shareholders can review the
Board of directors similar to the Board of directors evaluating the CEOs.
Meanwhile, the first rule of corporate power highlights that the majority
of shareholders control the votes and controls the corporation. However,
the shareholders cannot fire the CEO by themselves. Firing can only occur
through the Board of Directors, as Miller (2018) asserts. However, the
minority shareholder can merge with another to form a majority to act in
concert with directors to fire and hire CEOs. The Board of directors also
have the mandate to a fiduciary duty to look out for the company's best
interests. Company laws enabled the minority shareholders to influence
the Board of directors ho were 60 percent in attendance to fire the CEO
and hire another.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
evertheless, the laws hold that directors have the duty to care and loyalty.
Hence the majority stockholder, Laura, cannot fire the Newly elected CEO
since it requires the consent of the Board of Directors. Meanwhile, it would
hard to remove the CEO since both the CEO and the Directors have a
Fiduciary duty to the corporation. Even when Laura goes to court, she will
not prevail since she does not ascertain to the bylaws of the corporations
also if she owns 60 percent of the stock in the corporation.
Case 2
A tort involves the actions of an entity or person inflicting injury on
another, and hence the injured has the power to sue the other party
(Miller, 2018, pp.67-71). It resembles a crime that may not be intentional
in many cases. Henceforth, a tort case has four elements, which include
duty, breach of duty, injury, and causation based Miller (2018, p.68).
Meanwhile, torts are categorized into intentional, negligence, and strict
liability torts. Intentional torts include assault, deceit, trespass, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, among others. Negligence torts, on the
other hand, encompass, medical malpractice, slip, and fall accidents
among many, while strict liability includes defective products, dangerous
activities, or animal attacks. Courts recognize psychological injury as a
cause of action hence termed as an unintentional infliction or strict liability
tort (Miller, 2018). Sam, the regular visitor, even though feel okay when
the hairdresser condoles him but later has emotional distress over the
accidents and hence is legible to sue the barbershop. The harm occurred,
but the claim would not have adhered to the elements of a tort.
Nevertheless, the tort is unintentional and falls under the strict liability
since there exists no fault even of negligence. The claimant can only prove
that the tort occurred. The barbershop does not seem to have been
careless by law and hence becomes difficult to rule out the harm.
Nevertheless, all in all, it caused emotional distress, thus termed as a tort.
Case 3
In tort cases, the injured can seek compensation through a representation
of a counsel for the indemnities caused. The tort law in business
determines whether the person can be held legally responsible for the
actions that cause harm (Miller, 2018, pp.67-70). However, every premise
owner strives to keep its operations safe to protect the guests and the
employees. The law holds that the owner of the property owes a duty of
care to guests hence must defend them against negligence and intentional
accidents. Most jurisdictions rule in favor of the recovery for the harm
caused. Even if there is no intent to harm, the plaintiff can seek reclamation
damages. Practicing, according to the code of ethics, helps lessen the risk
of harm to others (Miller, 2018, pp.2-8). For instance, the customer whose
lap was burned due to the professional negligence of the waitress. The
harm caused is a tort since the waitress failed to adhere to professional
standards. Yes, the action was not deliberate, but the carelessness inflicted
pain on a customer. However, the tort is not intentional since it involves a
slip and a fall. Negligence, as asserted, is amongst the most common
occurrence of all the types of torts. They occur mostly in the car,
motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. It becomes challenging to
rule out whom to incur the cost of the damage. However, as for this case,
since it is LLC, then the cost of damage is split between the other members
and me. The intentional torts are judged as real crimes, unlike these
unintentional crimes where only damages and harm are incorporated.
Case 4
In limited liability companies, management does not incorporate meetings
or paperwork and hence not bound by the ownership limitation (Miller,
2018, pp.354-360). A sole proprietorship company incurs direct taxation,
while for a limited liability company can choose on the taxation scheme
depending on the type of business. However, sole proprietorship means
that there is only one owner who incurs all the operational costs (Marson
& Ferris, 2015, p.315). Henceforth, it can also bear all the losses and
lawsuits; the only advantage is that the sole proprietor can enjoy the
monopoly of governing and the profits. It becomes challenging to sell to
people shares to assist in the management. Hence the only structure that
limits the advantages of a sole proprietorship is the corporations or the
limited liability company. In this case, it is essential to shift to a limited
liability company since it is convenient to form and manage. For a limited
liability, a member cannot be held legally responsible for any wrong
undertakings (Miller, 2018, p.354). It means that the personal obligation
on debts, taxes cannot reflect the owner. It allows for flexibility and simple
partnership formulations and control. The small occupational therapy
practice hence should incorporate LLC since it has complete freedom in the
distribution of ownership with regards to its members.
Case 5
Organizational integrity has many definitions and opinions, according to
different managers and CEOs. Ethics can sometimes become a confidential
matter between employees and their conscience (Miller, 2018, p.113). A
company can bear the responsibility for an employee's misdeeds, but this
has never been in the minds of many managers. In the long run, ethics has
nothing attached to management (Miller, 2018, p.114). In adherence to
corporate governance, the Board approves the corporate strategies while
auditing plays a critical role in managing the company's input and output
(Marson & Ferris, 2015, pp.384-385).
Meanwhile, the company compensates for any travels and meetings
attended by the CEOs. That means organizing for their accommodation
meals and recreation allowances. At the end of conferences, whatever the
CEOs choose to work on is their own business. In this case, any
undertakings at the meetings that involve personal actions, then the CEO
becomes liable. Hence the party that caused the damages is a personal
responsibility and not a company's.
Consequently, any bill after that must be personally incurred. Therefore, I
would be responsible for the $50,000 bill of damages after the party, and
the company is not a part of it. Moreover, even if the corporation organizes
the business conference, that does not mean that the corporation should
incur the damages. The damages are personal encounters and it upon the
CEOs to maintain organizational integrity.
References
Marson, J., & Ferris, K. (2015). Business law (4th ed.). Oxford University
Press.
Miller, R. (2018). Business law; Text and Cases; An Accelerated
Course (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
