P a g e | 1
THE IMPACT OF ABLEISM ON SOCIETY
1. INTRODUCTION TO ABLEISM
Ableism means the discrimination and prejudice that individuals with disabilities or people who
are believed to have a disability experience. Ableism is rooted in the belief that there is an ideal
way to be – in terms of body and mind – such that a person can be as autonomous and productive
as possible at any given moment and that those who fail to live up to that imagined standard are
somehow inferior or less worthy of life. Hostile or inaccessible environment includes staircases,
ramps, buildings, doors that cannot be accessed by people with mobility impairment, lack of sign
language or other forms of communication means for those with sensory and intellectual
impairments, no opportunities at work or in school or anywhere in public space for people with
social disability. There is also internalized ableism and it is true that some disabled people will
subconsciously hold those prejudices that society has placed them in. Therefore, according to
disability scholars, disability is mostly constructed through culture, society and politics and not a
flaw in the person. It results from interface of structure, service, and society where structure and
society exclude individuals and services fail to meet the needs of individuals. Until now society
and environment cannot accept those who differently functions hence disability is still treated as
deficiency or defect of the person and not of the society and environment. Ableism as such
maintains the idea that there are acceptable and unacceptable bodies and minds, especially when
productivity is equated to the value of such a human being in market-oriented societies, and
those who cannot fit the social definitions of the so-called ‘normal’ able-bodied and independent
subject are marginalized. Ableism today may not be as in-your-face because of disability rights
activism, and there is more inclusion and some access – yet, the less obvious types are just as
damaging: low expectations, inspiration porn tropes, microaggression, and erasure that continue
P a g e | 2
to exclude disabled folks. If the world is still dismally unfriendly to the disabled, making the
latter struggle for representation, respect, access, self-determination instead of the latter being a
basic human right in the society, then one can safely conclude that ableism infuses into the
social-political-cultural life of America, and many more developed societies, skewing the
institutions with prejudice that impacts almost one fifth of the American population. To address
ableism, means a change in perception to accept disability as an aspect of human difference and
strive to ensure that the disables, like all citizens, have equal opportunities as regards to
accessibility, rights and choices in all aspects of life.
a. Defining ableism and disability
Ableism means discriminating between those with disabilities and those with full ‘ableness,’ or
able-bodied, and it is a negative perspective to hold towards people with disabilities. Indeed, part
and parcel of ableism is outing and marginalization of people living with disability. Ableism is
based around the concept of what people ‘should’ be like; having an ideal body and mind, and
therefore viewing disabilities as somehow less than acceptable. Influenced by the ableist world
view, it is shocking that the society still holds the opinion that persons with disabilities require
fixing, or cannot perform optimally. In fact, the concept of disability has a wide net that is cast to
capture various deviations of human bodies and minds. Disability scholar Rosemarie Garland
Thomson, nicely sums up the concept by stating that disability is ‘the transformation of flesh as
it encounters world’. Disability does not lie in the bodies that fail to conform to the so called
standard but in disabling environments and cultures. When the physical environment and culture
take a disabled person proverbial ‘ableness’ into consideration, then one encounters disabling
barriers that limit him/her. A disability can be physical, such as mobility or sensory impairment
or a neurological or muscular disease; it could also be cognitive, including learning or mental
P a g e | 3
health conditions; and chronic health conditions affecting major life activities. Most people with
disabilities still live invisible lives; it is therefore challenging to put a figure or type of the
diversity of human bodies and minds affected by ableism. Whether blatant or subtle, ableism
marginalizes people with a disability and systematically positions them as Other through
exclusion, erasure, and oppression of disabled subjectivity and citizenship. Intersectional
approaches explain how disability identity amplifies other disadvantaged categories such as
racism and sexism. Lastly, disability is conceived as a difference beyond measure, as the infinite
variations of the human body and ability, which undermines fixed biological types. Disability as
a social construct and human rights concern requires a critical analysis of contextual conditions,
systems and relations that oppress and marginalize persons with disabilities. This social model of
disability rights demands that people accept disability as normal variation that is an acceptable
part of human diversity and therefore does not call for eradication from society since public
spaces, education, employment and relationships require it. Hands on combat of ableism means
continuous engagement of persons, organizations and the state in the process of deconstruction
as well as in the process of empowering and enabling disabled people to regain their
independence and to become full integrated members of society.
b. Historical perspectives on disability
There are historical relations between disability, ability and cultures in terms of social norms,
values, structures, and systems throughout different historical periods. Disability, based on
historical legal codes, changed the rights and status of an individual and made it possible for
people to be treated inequitably under the law. The lack of access to buildings, employment and
social institutions, as well as the stigma associated with disability, effectively precluded many of
those with physical or mental disabilities from participating in society, although it should be
P a g e | 4
noted that there were some exceptions for the wealthier classes, who could arrange for private
accommodation. Charity hospitals of the medieval period ware indivisible and institutionalized
people with disabilities and illness as are asylums and poor houses from the 17th to the
nineteenth century which not only removed affected persons from society. Enlightenment
scientific rationality that had informed the theoretical frameworks for disability filled theories of
biological deficiency and moral depravity as the dominant understanding of disability’s cause
and origins thus warranting repetition of the exclusion. Industrial wage labor not only subjected
the disabled to the social construction of their economic worth and productivity as means of
oppression when their disadvantageous systematic locations did not allow them to be
economically productive. On the other hand, the independent living movement starting from
1960 shut a raw against the dependency-oriented service paradigms while advocating for
inclusion and autonomy. Preventing Discrimination in Legal System paves way to the 1990’s
Americans with Disabilities Act, which establishes equal access and participation rights with the
landmark Federal Civil Rights Legislation. However, attitudinal barriers, physical barriers,
communicative barriers, and economic barriers are still prevalent today that inhibit the clients
from getting a full social inclusion. These intricate dynamics reflect sociocultural paradigms and
presuppositions that situate differences of human diversity in bodily, sensory, neurological,
intellectual, and psychological domains vis-à-vis the normal—the fundamental groundwork that
sustains institutionalized and interpersonal ableism throughout history.
c. Models of disability (medical, social, cultural)
There are various models that aims at categorizing disability, the most common being the
medical model, societal and cultural model. The medical model perceives disability mainly in
medical way as a health condition or physical or mental impairment, considers physical and
P a g e | 5
functional characteristics/loss one has and how far or close they are to a set norm or standard. In
this view, the disabled individual is considered to be an abnormal one and thus has to be brought
back into line through rehabilitation or some other method. This not only perpetuates ableism; it
gives preference to particular skills and intelligence linked to the powerful groups and does not
acknowledge structural issues as the causes of disabled people’s marginalization. The social
model emerged primarily in response, moving towards the emphasis on the personal limitations
of an individual and instead, focusing on structural barriers that keep the impaired person out of
mainstream society and equal opportunities. Disability here arises from non-implementation of
accommodations to facilitate interaction and inclusion regardless of mobility or mental
impairment, or otherwise negative assumptions and perceptions regarding productivity. This does
not mean that medical processes affecting functioning are abolished, but it isolates the
experience from the contextual factors that are not inherent to the individual. Lastly, it is refined
by the cultural model where disability is considered as a variation of the human tapestry,
rejecting perceptions that certain milestones must be attained in order to be welcomed into
society and make a productive addition. Both Disability identity and experience are regarded as
shaped by certain cultural assumptions about bodies, minds and senses. From this perspective, it
is demonstrated how social power and white privilege in particular, produces preferences and
assumptions of some abilities over others not solely in terms of access but in ways that run
deeply into beliefs and representations, with dominance of ableist ideas during periods of greater
constraint of disability groups. By employing these models, it becomes evident that disability is
as much or even more a result of actions of societies and institutions towards human differences
as much as it is a result of physical variations, implying that transform of social structures and
P a g e | 6
perceptions is the way to ensure people with impairments get a chance to live a normal life and
be integrated into the society.
d. Intersectionality and ableism
There are various models that aims at categorizing disability, the most common being the
medical model, societal and cultural model. The medical model perceives disability mainly in
medical way as a health condition or physical or mental impairment, considers physical and
functional characteristics/loss one has and how far or close they are to a set norm or standard. In
this view, the disabled individual is considered to be an abnormal one and thus has to be brought
back into line through rehabilitation or some other method. This not only perpetuates ableism; it
gives preference to particular skills and intelligence linked to the powerful groups and does not
acknowledge structural issues as the causes of disabled people’s marginalization. The social
model emerged primarily in response, moving towards the emphasis on the personal limitations
of an individual and instead, focusing on structural barriers that keep the impaired person out of
mainstream society and equal opportunities. Disability here arises from non-implementation of
accommodations to facilitate interaction and inclusion regardless of mobility or mental
impairment, or otherwise negative assumptions and perceptions regarding productivity. This does
not mean that medical processes affecting functioning are abolished, but it isolates the
experience from the contextual factors that are not inherent to the individual. Lastly, it is refined
by the cultural model where disability is considered as a variation of the human tapestry,
rejecting perceptions that certain milestones must be attained in order to be welcomed into
society and make a productive addition. Both Disability identity and experience are regarded as
shaped by certain cultural assumptions about bodies, minds and senses. From this perspective, it
is demonstrated how social power and white privilege in particular, produces preferences and
P a g e | 7
assumptions of some abilities over others not solely in terms of access but in ways that run
deeply into beliefs and representations, with dominance of ableist ideas during periods of greater
constraint of disability groups. By employing these models, it becomes evident that disability is
as much or even more a result of actions of societies and institutions towards human differences
as much as it is a result of physical variations, implying that transform of social structures and
perceptions is the way to ensure people with impairments get a chance to live a normal life and
be integrated into the society.
e. Language and representation
Language and representation of people with disabilities that is used by the media is a critical
factor that contribute towards perpetuating or transforming ableism in society. This is a clear
indication that unlike in the previous centuries where the disabled were referred to in a very
degrading way, the modern-day society uses more friendly terms and even where one has to be
referred to by the disability, it is done in a very humane way. However, language continues to be
an intense social battlefield, as such descriptors as ‘special needs,’ ‘handicapped’ or ‘mentally
retarded’ continue to be used alongside the campaigns that call for their replacement with the
more positive identity-based language, which puts the emphasize on the individual’s capacity to
govern their life instead of focusing on the supposed pathology of a body that deviates from the
so-termed ‘normality’. Aside from terminology itself, patterns of representation across different
domains of culture, including but not limited to media portrayals and political discourse, offer
signals that either reinforce or destabilize normative understandings of disability as unworthy of
protection. Using pity, inspiration, heroism, or charity as response to disability through symbols
and images re-entrenches the construction of disability as deviance and that the representation of
disabled characters and the inclusion of disabled voices in various genres remain abysmally low.
P a g e | 8
Discussions about policy in the same vein can lead to perspectives where disability legal rights
or social service programs are viewed as special provisions instead of fundamental concerns of
human rights and fairness if the voices and viewpoints that are being represented are temporary
abled-bodied policy makers. But culture is very fluid since collective representations evolve
through the constant flow of images, narratives, and messages that reshape hegemonic
dispositions towards the vulnerable populations over time. As a result, changes in the symbolic
construction and humanization of disability across different domains of public life can gradually
create the disability as a part of the universal human spectrum rather than the pathology to
eliminate. Since language and representation give signals to social treatment, the use of
expressive culture as an agenda to change attitudes supporting ableist assumptions is still crucial
in the alteration of this belief-system concerned with exclusions, the lexicon employed and the
construction of disability across the domains of communication contributes to the affirmative
cultural perceptions of disability, and thus, the patterns of analysis offer a breakdown of the
cultural construction of disability as a devalued category in need of intervention rather than a
natural state of biological and/or mental deficiency of specific individuals.
2. INSTITUTIONAL ABLEISM
Ableism means discriminative or prejudicial treatment of persons with
disabilities. Organizational ableism involves the integration of negative attitudes and
discriminations against the disabled into the structures of various organizations in societies such
as government, schools, workplaces, religious places, and health facilities. These structures
frame non-disabled people as the norm, while framing disabled people as deviant ‘others,’ who
must abide by the standard they did not design or achieve. For instance, an educational system
that fails to ensure that various facilities such as interpreters, tutors, and technologies that enable
P a g e | 9
disabled students to learn easily is a system that displays institutional ableism through putting
barriers that hinder the disabled students from excelling in their learning. Achieving a similar
level of learning or having equal opportunities to learn proves to be extremely difficult for the
disabled students due to the effort they have to put in just to be able to attend school. A rigid
scheduling, role assignment, or equipment also institutionally discriminates against workers with
health complications or disabilities by constraining their means of performing their operations.
These structures are embedded in ableist ways which actively discriminate against disabled
people, thus denying them equal chance to access employment and engage in other civil
activities. Disabled people to have to work to overcome these barriers or ‘pass’ as non-disabled
and this process is a massive physical, psychological and financial exertion and it impacts on
their health. Moreover, institutional ableism makes non-disabled persons to perceive disability as
a lack of rather than a difference that should be embraced and thus, they continue to oppress
disabled persons by stripping them of their liberties and choices through forced admission to
hospitals or to be under conservatorship, the right to vote is denied, and they are barred from
making reproductive decisions. By framing disability as something terrifying or deserving pity as
opposed to a part of the human diverse, institutional ableism also reinforces prejudice and lays
the foundation of the belief that disabled lives are not worth living due to the legal sanctioning of
‘wrongful birth’ and ‘wrongful upbringing’ cases and the selective termination of pregnancies
based on the perceived imperfection of the fetus. These two tactics of dehumanizing disabled
individuals also results to many being locked out of financial security and end up in poverty and
homelessness. Finally, thus, embedded discrimination is detrimental not only to disabled
individuals but also defiles the richness of society by excluding the contributions and denying the
worth of as much as twenty percent of the population. It is therefore important to deconstruct
P a g e | 10
institutional ableism so as to develop the society, which embraces the value of disability as part
of human existence that enables everybody to be productive and benefit from the society’s
various offerings.
a. Education systems and accessibility
Schools are one of the most significant social institutions whereby the community is socialized,
but they have not, to this extent, met the needs of disabled persons. Frameworks and structures
that are predicated on or born out of a lack of knowledge of disability create layered barriers.
Lack of access to classrooms as physical environments, inaccessible instructional practices, and
accommodations erases disabled individuals’ existence as the able-bodied are assumed to be the
norm before disabled learners have to advocate for their right to education. Despite legal ban on
discrimination and the provision of accommodation for disability, factors like stigma and
attitudinal barriers make implementation and enforcement of these laws very patchy, denying
most of the disabled pupils’ equal chances and in essence, ensuring that many of them are
educationally segregated from other non-disabled children. Programs and services exclusion can
be directly linked to historical bars against the disabled learners but continues to exist in present
day in terms of perceived competence and track or program differentiation. Whenever systematic
barriers or otherwise toxic assumptions are left unchallenged, disabled students are much more
likely to experience lowered academic norms and negative social consequences. Lack of ramps
or elevators which may be architectural barriers to movement within the school compound may
cause disabled students to feel that they do not have control or bearing on what happens to them
or in the school activities. Lack of affordable childcare, limited availability of services for
families who are in a position to find adequate supports, and underdiagnosis of some forms of
learning differences are equally great factors of access. Furthermore, such a state of affairs
P a g e | 11
means that many schools across different school jurisdictions may offer more or fewer
opportunities for identification and accommodation procedures that ultimately shape the nature
of inclusion experienced by individual students. Not least, since many disabilities are not
apparent, if a person does not have access to tools and if considerations which are taken for
granted by others are not taken into consideration starting early on, a sense of failure is
constructed. The secondary effects of limited access persist long after graduation, which
discredits the lifetime career, economic and social opportunities for disabled persons. When
disabled students have access to learning environments designed for integration, then they are
capable of performing as well as the non-disabled students. Therefore, while making good the
call for funding and multi-stakeholder planning approaches for improving accessibility, the
policy measures directed at education systems are some of the most viable ways of combatting
institutionalized ableism and its damaging impacts on society.
b. Workplace discrimination and accommodations
Failure to hire a disabled person or to provide a reasonable workplace accommodation for a
disabled employee, are perhaps the best examples of institutional ableism that harm the society.
Ableism inherently disables a large part of the population by making it impossible for them to
engage in activities, become involved in decision making or succeed in endeavors. In workplace
institutionalization discrimination exists through employment discrimination, lack of provision
for special needs, inaccessible working environments, and little or no acknowledgement of the
potential of disabled employees. Some of the highly qualified people fail to get jobs because of
prejudices and since the employers assume that they cannot do the job because of their disability
or since they have workplaces designed for the physically challenged without any regard for their
needs. Discrimination in the workplace robs the disabled persons of equal chance in the sphere of
P a g e | 12
economy and social life and thus society loses the human diversity and their potential. Disabled
job seekers and employees suffer from unemployment and underemployment that in turn lead to
economic loss, loss of social identity, limited access to adequate healthcare, and reliance on
welfare programs. employees with disabilities can be provided special arrangements like flexible
workplace, accommodations for their disabilities, facilitate technologies and changes to
structures, thus ensuring they maximize on their potential in contributing to the company. But,
often, employers neglect to make adjustments because they are unaware, they do not have the
money, or because of the misguided patriarchal assumption that accessibility is not their
problem. The lack of accommodation significantly limits the employment opportunities
attainable by disabled persons and their chances of securing and maintaining any employment
suitable to their disability. Discrimination at the workplace, inability to reasonably accommodate
disabilities results in systematic prejudice and exclusion of disabled persons out of society. They
are also perceived to affect disabled individuals, alongside the rest of society, by encouraging
prejudice and by not respecting the equality and diversification of human beings. To tackle
ableism, people’s perceptions, organizations’ organizational structures, and policies need to be
shifted to encourage accommodations and the inclusion and support of disabled
persons. Employers should also understand that organizations that promote accessibility and
utilize disabled individuals by providing them adequate support benefit from their creativity and
view in organizations. Addressing AI as an institution requires for an equal society to be fostered
in order for all people to have equal opportunities enabling them to contribute to society and
maximize on their potential.
P a g e | 13
c. Healthcare disparities and medical ableism
There is a severe lack of accessibility and equal treatment of all citizens in healthcare systems
and medical ableism for people with disabilities. Prejudice and prejudice in other forms such as
racism and homophobia, the latter is a result of gender identity and sexual orientation, limit the
opportunity of disabled people to access medical services. Health insurance, transportation
issues, inability to pay, discriminative criteria, lack of access to proper diagnostic tools and
facilities, lack of ASL, Braille, and little to no education of disability culture within medical
personnel contribute to the existence of systemic barriers. These system failures are
unconstitutional and most significantly disadvantage disabled individuals, exacerbating already
existing disparities in health experience for chronic disease, preventive care, mental health,
reproductive autonomy, advance directives for end-of-life, and many other aspects. TH medical
ableism can therefore be explained as Discrimination of disabled patients by doctors and
healthcare facilities that strictly follow conventional perceptions of disability as the absence of a
body part or a sign of a deficiency that is shameful and must be eradicated. Disabled patients still
report that health care providers rarely acknowledge their own experience of a medical condition
and often underestimate their ability to know their own support requirements. Paternalism
impacts on provider’s decision-making, making decisions for disabled clients disregarding their
autonomy on issues to do with contraception, pain, treatments that sustain life and laws of
assisted suicide in a way that non-disabled patients cannot experience extent of limited informed
consent. Furthermore, quality of life assessments relying on nondisabled standards self-directs
providers towards diverting healthcare resources away from disabled individuals. These systemic
issues therefore translate to disability denial of fair and equal medical treatment. Historically
addressing the healthcare inequalities and medical ableism requires broader reform to ensure
P a g e | 14
disabled patients’ right to equal access to proper, individualized medical treatment similar to non-
disabled patients.
d. Legal frameworks and disability rights
Disabled people have been marginalized because of abilities which is deeply-rooted in societal
norms, practices, and processes. Disability rights have gradually been written in legal
frameworks but to be included fully it is still a problem. Prominent pieces of national legislation
such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 provided equal rights by banning
employment, public service, transportation, telecommunications, and public accommodation
discrimination. This supreme civil rights act recognized Civil Rights that imposed structural
limitations which excluded one from engaging in an activity in a reasonable manner from
receiving reasonable adjustments. Still, subsequent Supreme Court decisions have refined other
definitions of disability to a mere skeleton of what it once was, and therefore restricted the range
of people able to appeal for protection. Social model perspectives are more appropriate in
regarding disability as situated in barriers rather than in physical or mental differences, but the
latter are the dominant notions of the individualistic medical model currently shaping laws and
policies. Some awareness raising programs such as the UN Convention on Rights of Persons
with Disabilities contributed to improve disability rights across the world with 180 countries
participating by ratifying the convention. However, such implementations still resonate with
medicalized charity attitudes, and many countries remain in denial of the failure to advance
commitments made under the CRPD in practice. The idea of ‘special’ provisions for users
continues to predominate over the concept of ‘universal’ designs in education, health care, and
housing, and employment programs targeting the ‘rehabilitation’ of disabled people into
environments rather than challenging barriers to inclusion in society. They also include ones
P a g e | 15
which are based on race, gender, sexuality and socio-economic status so that they serve to further
oppress people with other subordinate positioning as disabled. Systemic and structural ableism
are not a simple legal issue, and this is why addressing disability rights involves much more than
just narrow legal solutions.
e. Urban planning and physical accessibility
City planning processes and the choice of goals previously disregarded accessibility for disabled
people as well as any other aspect of discrimination against disabled individuals as the result of
societal ableism. Neoliberalism in built environments with physical barriers inscribes a hidden
message that some bodies need to move and the other bodies should not. Everyday features such
as steps preceding entrances, door frames and corridors that are standard width and directional
signs that do not direct to accessible routes, as well as inaccessible transportation systems are
ordinary features that contribute to the disabling of public environments. Where curb cuts,
elevators, automatic doors, and ramps cannot be seen as elements of the worldbuilding of
neighborhoods, a sign ‘Disabled – Restricted Access’ is posted for many disabled people who
want to be active participants of the community. Symbolically marked almost as a fortress, the
spaces of the public sphere are divided into the fully inclusive for majoritarian corporeal
normativity versus the selectively open. The accumulation of architectural barriers experienced is
not simply about individual spaces but the chaining of those spaces that eliminate one’s ability to
move from work to social functions or events, home and other places to meet needs and
opportunities that many non-disabled citizens would consider as easily accessible. Although this
study does not flat-out exclude people from venues and locations with diverse mobility
requirements, the indirect exclusion created by the absence of accommodation to disability
achieves the same. Whereas institutional ableism is not just policy discrimination but the
P a g e | 16
assumed position that considers planning environments mainly ‘for’ only normal bodies.
Focusing on beauty and performance objectives while defining and implementing design
strategies that neglect accessible environments allows administrators and planners to ignore
systematic disadvantages that are created by design in the built world. Accessibility is often
discussed as an optional feature that could be added on top of the basic product, rather than as a
fundamental right and a crucial element of design. The responsibility then shifts to those with
disabilities who must attempt to remold entry through isolated complaints to properties primarily
funded through tax payer money. As such, the absence of mandated requirements regarding the
physical environment exonerates the social institutions from being compelled to construct in the
form that is accessible. This treat access as personal accommodations grudgingly granted instead
of communal obligation, which firmly entrenches the default presumption that integration of
disabled people is still an afterthought.
3. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ABLEISM
Ableism is a discriminatory or prejudicial attitude towards people who are crippled or people
with other disabilities. It discriminates against the disabled, those who have physical, mental,
intellectual or sensory disabilities. Social and cultural ableism is defined more narrowly as it
concerns psychosocial, cultural and discursive constructions that enable the negative positioning
and marginalization of persons with disabilities. Some of the ways through which such ableism
manifests itself are: Public physical structures and arrangements, for instance, are developed with
little regard to disabled people, such as transport systems with no features for impaired use,
government buildings and institutions that lack facilities for the physically impaired, and social
policies that continue to contribute to health inequalities among disabled people. There is also a
lack of cultural presence and portrayal, as people with disabilities represented and portrayed
P a g e | 17
rarely, misrepresented, or omitted from a range of media products and art forms. When present,
they are often depicted from a disability perspective: as objects of sympathy, admiration or
admiration rather than as persons with right to self-determination. Language is a powerful tool
that constitutes the culture and it is not exempted from the ableist culture, thus we have phrases
like ‘getting lost in translation’, ‘falling on deaf ears’, ‘turning a blind eye and the list is endless
illustrating disability as inferiority. However, the most or rather the least visible may be social
barriers and stigma. These stereotypical portrayals portray differently abled people as helpless,
deviants who are unable to fend for themselves. Discrimination comes in many direct and hidden
ways, from exclusion or ridicule to denial of chance or privilege. Most importantly, of course,
disability is an integral aspect of diversity; however, social and cultural ableism situates persons
with disabilities and their impairment impacts as issues to manage, address, manage or eliminate
as opposed to embrace. Any form of ableism is disadvantage for people with disability in
different aspects of their lives — from health and well-being to citizenship and quality of life,
including legal rights and social and economic opportunities. Despite the upsurge of disability
rights activism and identity politics, the advancement towards ‘Getting the word out! Disability
in the twenty-first century’ has been characterized by incrementalism rather than
revolutionism. The ableism that is embedded into the social and cultural fabric of society
remains to significantly affect PWDs in the sense that it limits their self- and community-
organizing agency based on a cultural logic that still prescribes the norms and standards of
ability.
a. Media representation of disability
Media is one of the most powerful tools of influencing the culture, attitudes, perceptions and
practices of the people in society including those with disability. The potentially negative
P a g e | 18
influence of media representations in perpetuating ableist presumptions or even mirroring
disability prejudice is a major way through which cultural ableism in society might develop. For
example, most of the films, television programs, and news stories portray disabled people as
those who need to be cared for, had sympathy for, or helped. One of the more obvious areas of
compliance is what disability scholars call “inspiration porn”: charity advertisements where
disabled people are depicted performing basic tasks or chores in order to evoke feelings of
inspiration or sadness in the able-bodied viewers. These stereotypical representations amplify
paternalistic attitudes towards PWDs, indicating that their lives are automatically less fulfilling
and more of a burden than those of non-PWDs. They also give a wrong impression to a layman
that it is a norm for persons with an impairment to be miserable and suffering all the time. It is
important to clarify that the types of media representation described above arise from and are
consistent with the predominant ableist paradigm that is ingrained in most societies – that is, it is
far more desirable to be ‘normal’ than to be ‘disabled’ or ‘abnormal’. These representations also
erase agency and strength by making disabled people seem perpetually tragic. Such hurtful
stereotyping undermines the Disability and useful contributions from members of this minority
group. Less superficial, ‘humanizing’ forms of media portrayal that present the diverse reality of
disabled people’s lives could facilitate this process. The inclusion in mass media, pressure from
disability Rights activists, and the representation of disability culture, and disability pride
through art, films, literature, media campaigns by the disabled may also assist in combating
internalized ableism and beliefs that disability is a loss of the quality of life. More visibility of
the disabled people in the everyday aspects of life like as workers, parents, friends, or active and
useful members of society can go a long way in eradicating the stereotypes that form the basis of
such attitudes. Additional representation of disability in forms such as disability politics, rights,
P a g e | 19
matters of ableism and accessibility hurdles would also raise awareness on topics that are hardly
discussed in the media. Responsible, diverse representation of disability in news and
entertainment programs holds immense potential to challenge and erode cultures of ableism and
provide disabled people with a better chance at fair representation and inclusion in society.
b. Stigma and stereotypes
Disabled people suffer from numerous stereotypic and stigma that impede their social inclusion
and full integration in the society. These negative social perceptions bring into the society the
picture the disabled individuals as helpless, deviant, deserving pity, or a menace to society. Even
at a young age, society uses negative stigmatization methods to educate non-disabled people that
disability is undesirable. This means that the disabled are portrayed as being a nuisance, and that
they are always a burden to the society and not the other way round as we have seen with the
independent drivers. Cultural prejudice also propose that it is difficult for individuals with a
disability to have an average or above average intelligence. These stigmas are a barrier to the
lives of disabled people in developing friendships, relationships, including dating and romance,
employment, etc. Self- stigma results in feelings of shame, low self-esteem, isolation and
exclusion in disabled persons. While the Americans with Disabilities Act exists, and other laws
to that extend disabled citizens’ rights, prejudice culture remains quite prevalent for it to allow
for the assimilation of disability diversity. Organized and dominant negative perceptions of
disability as a misfortune sink into cultures and affect matters generally. Stereotypes being seen
as a normalized reality of society continue to cement the idea that being able-bodied and able-
minded is the correct thing. This ableism extends to the various facets of the society, which are
all in varying ways, a detriment to those with disabilities. Unless, and this is a big IF, people go
from seeing disability as something to be feared or pitied to seeing disability as simply one more
P a g e | 20
facet of human diversity, the task of eradicating all barriers produced by stigma remains difficult.
A core premise of progress is more exposure, better representations in media, increased
representation and visibility of disabled people and their diverse opinions, and active discussion
– but the entrenched nature of the belief that disability is inherently negative requires constant
and ongoing challenge and erasure within and between organizations and in society. Disability
has infiltrated the society with stigma and stereotyping, but using the right effort and action, the
bias towards disability can be challenged and eradicated to conform to environments that allow
for disability. This will enable disabled people to be fairly assessed in terms of the kind of
persons they are, and the kind of abilities they possess rather than the falsehood imposed by
society about having a disability.
c. Family dynamics and ableism
Self-identification, worldview, support resources, and grieving processes in response to ableism
reflect familiar dependencies in different spheres of life. It can therefore be posited that any form
of an impairment, disorder or illness that affects one family member automatically affects the
entire family. Cultural beliefs, economic status, family norms and methods of communication are
examples of factors that may cause a vast difference in the reactions depending on the structure
of the family unit. This can be achieved by accommodating the diversity of human experiences,
availing every form of support for interdependence, and seeking for all the opportunities for
balanced development of all family members. Nevertheless, internalized ableism, even if it is not
as overt as that showcased in the movie, can be just as destructive when it occurs within a family.
Other examples of microaggressions include the use of ableist comments that enforce specific
stereotype that disables’ experiences are negligible and are just a part of harmless remarks. For
instance, a father demanding to know when they will be ‘cured’ of diabetes from a child
P a g e | 21
suffering from the disease is the manifestation of the hegemonic understanding that every disease
must be cured, and the only good body free from any form of disability or impairment as defined
by the medical model of ability. Such questioning negates the child’s diverse bodily formation
and their right to integration and respect of their differences. In contrast, skipping substantive
conversation due to discomfort with the disabled child’s condition can lead to the disabled family
member being cast away, as the mere mention of the topic is considered shameful. Whether
stated or unstated, such reasonableness involves assumptions such as: ‘it is unreasonable to
impose a burden on others; I should not inconvenience others’ – all of which means that family
members are unable to foster interdependence, to share resources, or to support one another
when needed. It is also evident in contracting parental expectations for disabled children to levels
of ability rather than shared interest, in the process effectively denying the child an opportunity
to develop into a whole personality in an inclusive society. Besides the nuclear family, disability
is accompanied by other prejudices which affect disabled individuals in a society, for example, a
prejudiced view on a genetic disorder or mental illness may lead other members of an extended
family or community members to pity disabled persons as incapable at times even discouraging
families themselves from sharing their diagnosis. In a general sense, family dynamics in relation
to disability have a significant part to either promote resilience as well as reinforce oppression
against disabled people for systemic ableism. On the one hand, families are necessary and can be
considered as supportive; on the other hand, families can also cause severe abuse through the
internal promotion of ableism. In order to prevent ableism within families, it is important to
actively raise awareness about ableism and its assumptions, increase the level of meaningful
discussion on disability, promote interdependence and build sustainable accommodations that
will actually meet the needs of disabled people through the increased understanding of
P a g e | 22
disabilities. Challenging the traditional system of ‘fixing’ the disabled and ensuring that the
family takes care of disabled members by empowering them to advocate for themselves can go a
long way in shifting the societal norms to be more inclusive.
d. Relationships and sexuality
Both males and females with disabilities are equally always faced with high levels of barriers
and discrimination in as much as relationships and sexuality are concerned. Another social
construct that the disabled are subjected to is the belief that they are unable to have any form of
relationships or improper for relationships. Such beliefs originate from cultural ableism, where
disability is considered as a loss, and the lives of disabled individuals are assumed to be
substandard or worthless. As a result, persons with disability face a lot of difficulty in having
their sexual and reproductive rights, being honored within society. Examining the barriers in
relationships and companionship more carefully, the disabled people experience a significantly
lower number of potential dating partners compared to those without such a disability. One such
factor that has been observed as lacking in this regard is the gross invisibility of disabled persons
as potential romantic partners. In addition, some could come up with presumptions that a
disabled individual is incapable of giving consent or capable of maintaining a sound romantic
relationship. Therefore, the individuals with both mental and physical disabilities express
feelings of loneliness, invisibility or invisibility when seeking to exercise their right to courtship
or association. They remain vulnerable to such prejudice also in their adulthood, specifically in
their relationships; the prejudices may negatively influence the recognition of their worth as
suitable partners and bring stigma to their partners. The main issue that remains difficult to
address is breaking cultural barriers and eradicating biases that a person of disability is not
capable or not good enough. Regarding sexuality, it is possible to completely ignore the sexuality
P a g e | 23
of disabled individuals or sanction their nonsexual state. By dissuading exploration of sexual
desires, not offering sex education that encompasses disability, or in denying choice of when to
have children, disabled people’s sexual rights and their bodily sovereignty are
violated. Additional challenges include accessibility and consent violations that exacerbate these
abuses. Disability and sexuality are socially excluded from the cultural ethos and disabled
persons are expelled from discussions and programs concerning sexual and reproductive health.
In conclusion, restrictive perceptions enforce punitive external constraints and embarrassing
stigma that mediate and stifle the formation and exercise of sexual self-identification for disabled
individuals. In the future, people with disabilities have to acknowledge the right of the disabled
persons to have sexual contact and healthy sexual relationships as other people do, as a part of
social diversity, which has to be opposed to the results of ableism in social structures and cultural
norms.
e. Ableism in sports and entertainment
Discrimination against people with disability is referred to as ableism and is strongly evident in
how sports and entertainment industries operate despite some signs of implicit, obscured and
systematic exclusion. The norms of athleticism and spectacle entertainment are assumed to be
based entirely on a sound body. There are hardly any disabled professional athletes, and if there
are, they do not display or even discuss their disabilities, thus giving the outward appearance that
one has to be able-bodied to be an athlete. Although adaptive athletics gives options, disabled
athletes do not possess similar visibility, participation, pay, and recognition as ableist athletic
organizations offer their athletes. Entertainment media also erases or restricts able-bodied
identities in the same manner and often only portrays disabled performances. Unfortunately, the
portrayal of disabled characters is hardly ever realistic; most of the time, they are used to serve as
P a g e | 24
examples of inspiration or as pitiful figures. The exclusion of disabled audiences from
performance venues applies multiple barriers and distances the disabled from cultural events
with surroundings designed for conventional comfort instead of a full inclusion. A feeling of
justice or the need for it is not enough to problematize foundational exclusions and aggressions
buried in social and entertainment practices. Despite good intentions, such efforts usually merely
offer limited adjustments instead of genuine integration and equal opportunities for individuals
with disabilities and those of different races and genders, or those who have other barriers to
societal access. Entertainment’s crueler rules and presuppositions must be challenged more
radically in order to make more substantial change. Both sports and various kinds of live
entertainment stage theatre of participation, which has been core to identity constructions and
cultural rhetoric. Normalcy racism removes those developmental roots from the disabled
population while simultaneously perpetuating a physicality that erases disability. Greater
representation of disabled musicians and commentators can influence a more beneficial change
in the dominant stereotype and contribute to receiving more extensive accommodations.
Athletics, in the same way, could also reach out to its competitive winner-loser environments
with more accessible opportunities for disabled recreation and play through movement. In
making of disability, ableism needs to be unsettled, as well as other fixed structures of social
reality that unfairly exclude specific abilities or deviations. Increased awareness and conscious
efforts to remove such barriers offer first steps toward more fair participation in institution for
creating communal meanings that Shape societies’ morality and futures.
4. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ABLEISM
Discrimination that is given to the people with disability is referred to as ableism, and its
implications are felt in the economic realm at different tiers. On the personal level, people with
P a g e | 25
disabilities suffer from lack of opportunities to get education and get a job which can provide
them with fair earnings and personal finance. If one is disabled, the chances of finding a job and
being employed have been incredibly low for over 30 years now; in the U. S., it is over 10% for
the disabled and less than 4% for the nondisabled. Despite the recent legislation for the
employment of people with disability, they are paid, on an average, only two-third of what
nondisabled persons are paid in a year. This effectively means that people with disabilities lack
reliable and affordable means of transport to their workplace, employers do not provide
necessary accommodations to make work accessible, and undergo discrimination during the
hiring process, and other challenges that make them economically excluded. At a macrolevel,
ableism cuts down on social productivity by excluding many people from the economy since
they cannot work effectively due to their disabilities. It is also noteworthy that the government
expenditure on disability welfare programs and public health costs that are directly related to the
absence of employment and poverty among disabled persons have risen. The current policy issue
is that larger fraction of disabled of working age results in low employment rate and dependence
on federal and state assistance. Lack of access to suitable environment as well as inability to use
accessibility tools to attend education or other digital platforms also limits economic
contribution. Together, ableism hinders people with disability from attaining their optimum
socioeconomic standing and concomitantly hinders the societal and economic well-being from
reaching optimum potential due to the lack of plurality and unequal utilization of all human
resource capabilities. Addressing the sources of economic marginalization due to ableism
requires multi-sectoral policy interventions aimed at improving education attainment of disabled
people and provision of economic incentives to employers and organizations, improving
conditions of disability benefits to encourage the working age disabled persons, improving
P a g e | 26
accessibility and inclusion of disability in physical and virtual environments, and the
campaigning against discrimination of disability. Despite the fact that ableism affects people on
individual, group and societal levels, intentional policy initiatives and public support for
disability rights can result into significant improvement in reducing the economic exclusion and
safeguarding the economic well-being of persons with disability.
a. Employment rates and wage gaps
There are significant barriers for disabled persons in finding employment and earning
inequalities which tend to be rooted in prejudice, architectural barriers, few accommodations and
policy supports. Ableism is seen in assumptions made towards what a ‘good’ worker is and
predisposes constructions of standards of efficiency and profit for the economy. These norms
marginalize and dis-empower those with abnormal minds and or/ bodies, thus excluding them
from participation. Thus, disabled populations have lower employment rates compared to regular
employees and have higher unemployment rates among the disabled populations than among the
nondisabled. Employment rates of working-age disabled people stand at 21 percentage points or
more less than the non-disabled people in many countries. It means that gaps exist even if age,
education, gender, and race are taken into account. There are numerous reasons why disabled
groups have low participation – from poor education and training which leads to little or no
access to job training programs, to physical barriers such as lack of means of transport or
disabled equipment making workplaces non-functional. Discrimination and stereotyping worsen
the situation by turning away applications from disabled candidates, doubting candidates’
abilities and denying them necessary accommodations. Those successfully working often
congregate in lower status, more routine jobs with limited opportunities to advance no matter
how much they learned or studied. While many would be more than happy to work those jobs
P a g e | 27
part-time and many others would have to delve around for low paying and extremely unstable
gig work. All of which worsens the financial crises of disqualified people as well as missing an
incredible potential of talents in the economies. In addition, wages due to ableism also have
negative effects and reduce income levels even further. The studies have also concluded that
disabled employees are paid less per hour than their nondisabled counterparts and are paid a
smaller annual salary – a difference that remains constant even after holding qualification equity.
Such distorted perceptions are propelled by biases that portray lesser functional capacity as
evidence of a diminished economic production and productivity, thus justifying poor wages.
Meanwhile failure to supply appropriate accommodations denies the disabled employee the
opportunity to work to their optimal capacity, giving employers another reason to offer lower
wages. In total, these barriers limit the number of employment opportunities available to the
disabled and reduce wages among such individuals. The consequences include increased
incidence of poverty, increased income-related health inequalities and billions of PPPs every
year in global economies. Challenging the economics of ableism and the roles it plays in society
requires action in the areas of disability inclusion and justice.
b. Poverty and disability
Disabled persons are in a very vulnerable position economically, suffering extreme poverty and
numerous barriers most of the time. ableism in different economic policies, work places and
employment policies including hiring, resource mobilization and social support systems
contribute to high levels of unemployment and underemployment amongst disabled persons.
Education is another factor; people with disabilities cannot achieve this as they are limited in
options to attend school due to lack of funds or means and; barriers to certain occupations or
careers also limit the economic potential of people with disability. Unfortunately, due to the
P a g e | 28
inability to find stable sources of income, the majority of disabled individuals cannot afford vital
needs like food, shelter, transport, as well as medical services. Most of them cannot even save
any sum of money or build any form of wealth, let alone, reasonable wealth. Consequently,
people with disabilities spend more on their basic human needs in areas such as health care,
assistance equipment and devices, modification of homes or cars, and live-in care givers. When
in poverty, these costs become unattainable, leaving one with little chance to live a life to the
fullest, or support themselves when coping with a disability in an inclusive community. Another
common primary determinant is the lack of proper access to governmental services and or
benefits programs one qualifies for due to his/her status in life. It would also be important for the
person to have understanding of bureaucratic rationality and procedural decision-making.
Poverty is disabling because this constrains one’s ability to decide and to act about and within a
given setting. Welfare reforms within the context of broader economic policies and social
relations that underpin growing poverty, and precariously expensive health care and housing also
have a bearing on PwD living in or close to poverty. It also suffers greater economic
vulnerability, and declining living standards at a far faster rate. Disability poverty therefore
originates from diverse ableism, which has been integrated into different sectors of society. It
will continue unless policies addressing the supply are implemented. Equal opportunities and
fairer economic structures and labor markets that are more inclusive and connected have become
a necessity. Ensuring a continued increase in assistance programs is also important so that people
with disabilities do not have to live in such an economic plight. Nonetheless, eradicating
attitudinal prejudice together with excluding disabled persons from access to services,
accommodations and opportunities while focusing on abilities that are given precedence in
P a g e | 29
societies and workplaces holds the key to the most enduring and transformative changes in the
disabled people’s economic status.
c. Cost of living with a disability
While ‘overhead’ expenses are the additional costs incurred by those with disabilities for needs
strictly associated with their disabilities which able-bodied persons do not have. Some of these
expenses include; medical expenses, special equipment, transportation, personal assistance, and
adaptability of homes including other essentials for the disabled. These additional costs can
further sum up to 0,000 depending on the extent of disability for a person with quadriplegia. The
costs are even higher for a person with moderate disability; it is almost unbearable to think
about. The extra expenses leave it extremely difficult to pay bills and basic needs, not to mention
progress financially. In addition to the costs associated with one’s disability, prejudice and
exclusion mean that people with disabilities incur significantly higher expenses in all aspects of
their lives. Some of them revealed that despite trying for years, it is nearly impossible to secure a
housing which is both affordable and accessible; thus, people with disabilities have to spend a
greater portion of their income on housing or take poor-quality housing. Accessibility to
transportation and mobility is costlier and structurally challenging because there are no easy
access to public transport, ride-sharing services, well-developed roads, or adequate parking
spaces. Purchasing often comes with added costs, including acquiring the product or service in
the first place, provided one can get access to the product or service. Activities that are executed
on daily basis, need more time, effort, organization and, most importantly, money. Studying by
using systems that one cannot access is time-consuming and costs a lot of money. The significant
expenses not only lead to severe economic strain but also lock the consumers into the cycle of
needing support and lowering their social and economic class. The disabled become trapped into
P a g e | 30
being helpless and poor, relying on government benefits and entrapment. Some people have low
earnings, and due to this, they cannot afford to train and educate themselves for promotions.
These capable and willing candidates cannot bear the costs relating to transportation, appropriate
technologies, support staff, medical bills, and other necessities for accommodating disability at
the workplace. Systemic prejudice in policies and mind-set contribute to oppression, and
marginalize disabled people from attaining economic stability and upward mobility. This means
that not only do people with disability incur extra unavoidable costs but they lack accessibility to
other sources of income thus rendering them financially unstable.
d. Disability benefits and social welfare systems
Disability discrimination has significant economic repercussions for people with disabilities as
the state keeps denying them essential provisions and welfare schemes. Discriminatory systems
also present a significant challenge to disabled people’s ability to access and retain financial
support that they would otherwise need due to their conditions that discourage them from
engaging in employment. Policies and practices that excluded the disabled population also lead
to issues such as high poverty and unstable economic status. For instance, rigorous eligibility
criteria for disability such as Medicaid, Housing Assistance, SSI often exclude those with certain
impairment types or could wrongly deem certain persons sufficiently employable. Furthermore,
disabilities are not valued or rewarded enough in government benefits calculations formulas and
funding is insufficient to social welfare organizations so that the payments received do not cover
many disability costs and or indeed offer an acceptable standard of living. The large number of
expenses which include assistive technologies, personal care services, medical treatment, and
transportation needs is not always covered appropriately. In addition, in many systems,
individuals with disabilities can lose all the benefits including even health care if their income
P a g e | 31
from such part-time employment exceeds very low ceilings, which only discourages any
progress in employment and opportunities for financial mobility. In addition, these few and
inadequate disability-based social supports also often last across significant portions of the life
course, leading people with disabilities, and often their families, to suffer from embedded
intergenerational economic injustice and deprivation. Finally, it will take significant social
changes to redress the economic disability that ableism creates; and substantial overhaul of the
governmental scheme of benefits to allow for a proper income stream that is also livable for the
recipients without undue incentive to discourage the recipients from seeking work, where
possible and where it is feasible. Sweeping reform is still therefore very required to fully
eradicate any residual discrimination against disability and to effectively reformulate fiscal
policies for the realization of rights and dignity of every citizen.
e. Accessible technology and innovation
Discrimination of the disabled which is termed as ableism not only impacts individuals with
disabilities economically, but the community at large. One place where these impacts can be seen
to some extent is through accessible technology and innovation. The only laws that have sought
to address this problem include the Americans with Disabilities Act, but in order to include
everyone, one needs to go a step further than the law demands. Nevertheless, a lot of
organizations do not pay enough attention to this problem because their goals are mismatched
and they are not aware of the issue. The study indicates that the implementation of assistive
technology includes the users with disabilities and the company’s financial success. According to
the findings of the study, the global market for assistive products for PWDs was identified to be
more than billion and continues to expand at an alarming rate. This is why the companies that
adopt accessibility as a core value in product design and development can meet this demand
P a g e | 32
adequately and at the same time render their products more usable to others as well.
Technological aids that help the PwD become active participants in the economy as customers
and workers. Features like variable keyboards, speech recognition, and applications like the
reader enable the disabled to interact with the technological systems on their own and much
more effectively. First, technology that is reachable not only improves the quality of life within
diverse ranges, for example, education, health care, governmental services, etc. it also cuts down
on dependence upon helpers, assistant, personal attendants, and other various more expensive
adaptations. Companies that invest in solutions that enhance accessibility reap the benefits of
good publicity, protection under the law, competitive advantage and favorable positioning for
future advances in the interface of man and machine. On the other hand, a barrier technology can
dramatically reduce the employment opportunities of a disabled persons, it also generates
expensive retrofitting costs. With technology progressively penetrating every sector of society,
special emphasis on universal design when applying technology and innovation in the society is
vital for tapping the full economic potential of such technological innovations. That is why
accessibility is not just an abstract concept, but has real potential financial advantages at every
level starting with the individual and ending with society as a whole. It allows people to take part
in such activities to the fullest extent possible and at the same time cut costs in the end.
5. CHALLENGING ABLEISM AND PROMOTING INCLUSION
The inaccessibility and stigma that disabled persons face in society is evident and has core life
implications that reduce access to opportunities and life satisfaction for a significant population.
Increased awareness of ableism, change in perception towards a more humanist approach
regarding people’s worth and capabilities based on their perceived or real disability, and
encouraging more progressive and human rights compliant legislation and policies constitute
P a g e | 33
some of the pressing needs for society. Disability history, culture, and perspectives are severely
underrepresented in educational curricula across the stages of early childhood education, K-12,
and higher education learning contexts. Education for ableism awareness, critical pondering over
assumptions and prejudice establishment requires integration into all subjects – language,
history, arts, natural and social sciences, ethics, and others as the permanent and contextually
non-variable features. This empowers and demystifies, and preempts stigma and prejudice. The
study reveals that individuals with disability have no access to physical space, or environments,
products, and other facilities, and are only given signals and signs that they are not wanted.
Basically, removing structural barriers has an immediate positive impact that can be measured in
terms of health, education and the economy of the society. Transportation systems, public areas,
publicly accessible places like parks, and organizations including privately owned public
accommodation including hotels and theaters, workplaces, and schools and commercial buildings
all need to be assessed and fixed. Be it the curbs made for easy stroller or wheelchair access on
sidewalks or signs that are tactually laid out to help a blind guy around; conscious efforts create
an environment that is more useable for more people. Disability, social media, web captioning,
screen reader, universal usability, and multiple input methods are examples of how technology
design powerfully includes or excludes opportunity and respect. Sources of income and financial
security are often tied with employment and its absence, limited to a few, comes as a result of
discrimination and exclusion from employment opportunities as well as inability to access
workplace with necessary accommodations for basic accessibility. Increasing the employment
equity to create a better opportunity will enhance the success of people and the economy as a
whole. Thus, according to the concept of ableism, the opportunities of social and civic
participation for disabled people at any point in the life cycle are limited. There are few or no
P a g e | 34
barriers that can be changed by a simple wish or a mere desire; thus, it calls for education and
advocacy to change the attitude of individuals.
a. Disability advocacy movements
People who are disabled have been discriminated against, pre-judged, and ostracized in a way
that has denied them equal opportunities to live and engage in the community. Ableism means,
literally, disability prejudice – the treatment of disabled people in a way that reduces their
capacity and chances. Within the last several decades, various disability activism groups have
appeared to combat the oppression and marginalization of disabled people across all spheres of
life. These movements have aimed at increasing the people’s awareness of disability matters,
pushing for adjustments of the policies and laws on disability, and enabling disabled persons to
fight for their rights on their own. Some of the significant disability rights organizations that
have advocated for its rights include the Disabled Peoples’ International, the American Disabled
for Accessible Public Transit, the National Federation of the Blind and Not Dead Yet. In order to
get their message across, these groups have engaged in demonstrations, marches and other forms
of civil protest to fight for the rights of the disabled and their right to be recognized and
integrated into society. For instance, the protest by the deaf and disability activists for the
president of the sign language university Gallaudet in 1980s to protest against the appointment of
the first deaf president successfully received media focus on disability issues in learning
institutions. The event known as the Capitol Crawl of 1990 demonstrated the disability activists
literally dragged themselves up the steps of the capitol to protest the lack of anti-discrimination
legislation for disabled Americans. However, the disability independence movement has also
advocated for social change through political actions and educating people about the disability
issues as well as liberating people with disability from stereotype portrayals through, arts, films,
P a g e | 35
and media. The movement has coined the phrase ‘Nothing About Us Without Us’ as a way of
communicating the idea that people with disability have to take charge and drive change and
decision-making regarding their lives, instead of being perceived as defenseless objects that need
to be cared for and given handouts. This concept of disability is evolving from a medical model
that looks for the problem within the person with a disability to a social model that sees the so-
called disability as arising from barriers, policies and negative attitudes. Nonetheless, the
advocacy must continue in order to fully respect the rights, integrate and promote the inclusion
and opportunities for persons with disabilities in education, employment, health care and other
aspects of the community life.
b. Universal design principles
Universal design is a process of designing products, services and environments, not only for the
highest percentage of people in the largest population range but for people of all ages and
abilities using them in the widest possible contexts. This development of the idea of UD started
from barrier-free environment and the assistive devices for disabled individuals to now
embracing the enhanced, beautiful, and functional design for everyone. Universal design
guidelines and interventions encompass the overall objective of designing for everyone and
making environments as free from barriers as possible with the goal of enhancing accessibility,
safety, health and well-being for individuals regardless of age, stature or disability status. There
are seven principles of the UD and these are focused on: equitable use, flexibility in use,
simplicity, perceptible information, tolerance of error, low physical effort needed, and space and
size for use. For example, the introduction of ground curb ramps where sidewalks have a
gradient reduces the need for ramp construction for wheelchair-bound people, enhancing their
access and subsequent engagement as well as the other users like those with strollers or carts and
P a g e | 36
the elderly. The overlooking of structures through such a universal design approach to all the
structures and product designs enable accessibility and the eradication of barriers that exclude
people with certain disability. Another provision of the Principle of Universal Design relates to
designing products that are as intelligible as possible and to eliminate the stigma associated with
assistive technology solely for the disabled. One example is in creating integration of easy to use
smartphones with today’s modern complex intuitive interfaces, which are usable for both normal
and visually impaired individuals via gesture navigation without the need for specific assistive
technology specifically for visually impaired people. Such inclusive design philosophy
eradicates discrimination for not recognizing disability associated needs. Implementing universal
design thinking is essential to address ableism deeply ingrained in accessibility and
infrastructural system design to ensure that individuals with disabilities are part of the world and
are actively included. Inclusive design for architecture promotes and enhance social participation
and access for the physically challenged. Self-service technologies of banking that are
universally designed, such as the talking ATMs that can be used by the blind and the sighted
enrich financial opportunities for the disabled. When there are such universal inclusion solutions,
it eliminates the two extremes, where people with disability are forced to conform to mainstream
design that excludes them while at the same time providing them with substandard, segregated
and stigma infrastructure that perpetuates ableism. This method called Universal design provides
an idea of the middle ground that caters for the disability needs in mainstream aesthetically
designed solutions for all as a way of encouraging integration and the deconstruction of
systematic ableism. Its emphasis on ability over disability thus fosters the necessary abilities to
empower more equitable participation. Applying such universal design philosophy across
infrastructures and policies address disability discrimination right at the design aspect focusing
P a g e | 37
on inclusion. It reverses the roles of ableism in a system that discriminates against disability
through designs that neglect or neglect disability requirements.
c. Inclusive education strategies
Schools have also discriminated against students with disabilities, with both mentality and
environment physically and mentally denying them justice of learning alongside other children.
In this way, ableism that permeates the cultures and curriculums of our schools assumes an
exclusive definition of academic achievement based on a certain able-bodied model. The main
principles of inclusive education offer essential theoretical tools to counter the ableism that
permeates schools’ organization and structure as well as to promote more diverse learning
environments. This means calling for policies, practices, family engagements and environmental
approaches encompassing an all-embracing strategy. The approach to inclusion starts with
leadership to provide for the reforms that are required, perform an audit that looks into the
current exclusion and work on institution-wide plans that amplify disabled people’s voices.
Teachers require continuous professional learning developing multicultural perspectives on
diverse body and mind. Inclusive teaching and learning, practices, and activities should reflect
the concept of multiplicity and not flatten disability or erase it or pathologize it. They can use
coursework to deconstruct able-bodiedness and then in a later class invite disabled guest
speakers or include texts from disabled authors. Some of the barriers that need to be addressed in
architecture include accessibility audits and modifications aimed at making it possible for
students with physical, neurological or sensory impairments to participate in the architecture of
classrooms and the other facilities as well as services within an institution. It can also be seen
that trauma-informed approaches enable promoting classroom conditions that are aware of
neurodivergence. In contrast to a process of adding accessibility features only when someone
P a g e | 38
requests it in order to receive accommodation, principles of Universal Design are proactive in
how they incorporate multiple ways of showing learning engagement and how competencies can
be developed. There is a need for the early and continuous engagement of parents of students
with disabilities in F–S partnerships to reduce the effects of ableism on students through the use
of collaborative support. By increasing participatory parity among members of the community,
inclusive education destabilizes the stringent and normalized definitions of success that are
predicated on specific ableist frameworks, thus enabling more children to find meaning and
purpose in learning. It elevates the voices of people who would otherwise be silenced, which
disrupts the ableism that pervades some cultures and portrays people with disabilities as being
defective. Finally, transformation involves all Learners getting to learn disabled students,
fostering the needed empathy and group advocacy. It is a slow process that involves challenging
systemic biases in society with consistent and rigorous critique coupled with creativity regarding
better and more pluralist options. In these ways schools are able to move from exclusion and
segregation which has been in the past to equal access to education.
d. Workplace inclusion initiatives
Disability-friendly policies, policies and practices at the workplace to address ableism and
enhance the inclusion of people with disabilities are several and varied. Some of the adaptations
employers can do in the physical layout include: providing ramps for wheel chair use, having
text to speech software on the computers, having flashing fire alarms and admitting guide dogs.
Policies regarding work scheduling including telework, flexibility in changing positions or
offering extra unpaid time off makes it easier for people with disabilities to find employment
since they may be beset with periods of medical illness and recovery. Ensuring flexibility proves
that offering hours of value adds do not have to mean having to be at the workplace 9-5. In
P a g e | 39
addition to the structural and procedural interventions, growing inclusion involves addressing
latent attitudes in organizational culture. In the development of the interpersonal climate, it is
crucial to refrain from using “disability- inferiority” words and generalizing about a person’s
ability or inability based on a disability. Disability equality training is useful in bringing out the
issues of stigmatization and informing workers of misconceptions they might have towards
disabled people. This kind of simulation fosters empathy since the trainees are made to move
around in a wheelchair, blindfold or plug their ears to mimic the situations of the disabled. Not
knowing what people go through results in negativity, exclusion, prejudice, and aggressions
rather than supportiveness. Organizations can incorporate use of proper language that is
embracing to disability and recognize disabilities events such as the International Day of Persons
with Disabilities and include disabled persons in their literature as a sign that the company
embraces all talents. Cultivating in-house sponsors and advocates, offering diverse employee
affinity groups and focusing on disability-specific internships or hiring help to give disabled
workers a better shot. Measuring hiring, advancement, and retention of disabled persons by
disability status holds leaders accountable as a way of proving that policies are not mere window
dressing. Instead of dictating what is best for the disabled employees, employers are encouraged
to engage the employees in a dialogue concerning their needs, engage in discussions regarding
ableism and offer the disabled full access to all technological, event and facility resources
available. It is evidence that the society has not embraced inclusion of persons with disability
because when such persons are not welcomed, empowered and fairly compensated for their
efforts as any other able-bodied person then it is clear that there is some form of discrimination
still exists. Progress in eradicating ableism is gradual, and when workplace diversity programs
are well planned and properly implemented and when new ways of perceiving disabled
P a g e | 40
employees, new ways of working with and for them, new ways of perceiving the disabled are
created, then the corporate culture and the culture of society is changed by the demonstration by
disabled people of what they are capable of doing.
e. Allyship and personal growth
Ableism or the favoring of the ability of the body is a social injustice that happens on both
structural and individual levels. For the person who wants to work against ableism, self-
reflection is essential in order to cease making judgements and assumptions about others. It is
relevant for me to justify if I stereotype people by judging their potential based on the
appearance they present to the public. Am I contributing to ableism when I laugh at diabetic
jokes or any other jokes that disrespect people with disabilities. It is important and enlightening
to look inside oneself and find the courage to confront certain unwelcome truths about one’s own
thoughts. Inclusion means being the listener, the supporter of minorities, the person who raises
the voice for disabled people instead of being them. Allyship is therefore the constant learning
especially on disablement matters and the policies that surround it promoting more accessible
environments in physical territories and the programs designed for the employment of the
disabled in various organizations. To be a part of disabled rights organizations by either giving
time or money shows support for the cause. Arriving ready to speak or be present at policy
meetings or protests reminds the world that disability issues are not someone else’s problem.
Registered personal development arises when there is a genuine interaction with disabled people.
When it comes to learning different types of cultures and ways of life, one’s worldview is
enriched. However, such a responsibility cannot lie with the disabled people and they should not
be expected to educate the public. I agree with the author and believe that open-mindedness is
critical during the listening process and questioning assumptions. Learning takes place beyond
P a g e | 41
comfort zones, and admitting one may not know something is a prime example. It helps in order
to prevent paternalism – that is, the disability movement working with others on disability rights
projects in such a way as to ensure that the aims and messages are set by disabled people
themselves. Inclusion must entail the provision of reasonable adjustments to allow the disabled
to engage in the intended activities. Let’s take Spencer who is a wheelchair user and Emily who
has social anxiety –What adjustments can assist them participate effectively? Growth means
understanding it is beneficial to provide “special accommodations” for one’s community, not
shut them out. Providing support to disabled people and encouraging decisions independently
taken enhances their power. If competence translates to a value equal to one person’s experience,
then Spencer and Emily know what’s best for them. Disabled justice is not advocacy for people
with disabilities or work towards a goal – it means falling and getting up over and over again to
build allyship and understanding.
