JUS 530 -EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISABILITY LEGISLATION

P a g e | 1

EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISABILITY LEGISLATION

1. FOUNDATIONS OF DISABILITY LEGISLATION

The history of disability legislation in most developed countries can be dated back to the early

twentieth century, when the disabled veterans of World Wars One and Two demanded support,

compensation, education and integration. This led to political argued the status of citizens and

gave rise to the first disability welfare payments. Although they were an advancement, the

legislation that provided this financial support relied on a medical model of disability, where

devices and support to live independently, and who should not be discriminated against because

of their disability. Hine and Rosenthal also changed the disability paradigm that was considered

to be a medical or individual issue and asserted that most of the troubles that disabled persons

encountered were due to environmental factors such as architectural designs, communication,

policy, and culture. Their pressure affected governments to slowly change the focus of disability

laws to one of civil liberties, the provision of the rights of disabled people, equal access and

accommodation. Measuring the efficiency of the new disability legislation of the late twentieth

and the early twenty-first century is not just a question of understanding and comparing the

income supports but the changes for the better in all aspects of life as regards equality,

opportunity, and status of disabled people. The last word is how mainstream places, processes

P a g e | 2

and paradigms are changed by legislation to regard disability as a normal variation of the human

The disability rights movement came into existence during the political and social liberation

movement in the 1960s. People of color particularly the African Americans, women and the

lesbian, gay, bisexual and transexual persons were struggling for civil liberties and human

respect. The disabled people also stood up for voting against discrimination and lack of

“504 Sit-in” spearheaded by Judith Heumann was a call to national recognition of disability

rights. Some of the other significant laws that came into existence during this period due to the

activism are Architectural Barriers Act, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and

Developmental Disabilities Assistance Bill of Rights Act.

including choices on their caregivers, dwellings, education and job opportunities. The

independent living philosophy has had a great impact on the American with disability act of 1990

P a g e | 3

that bars discrimination in terms employment, public services, public facilities and services and

the rights to be fully integrated into mainstream society.

Even though the ADA was one of the first steps in the fight for disability rights, activists knew

that the fight did not end there and that monitoring would be needed to ensure full compliance

with the law. When the Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Board of Trustees of

University of Alabama v. Garrett in the year 1999, whereby it was held that states could not be

made to answer for discrimination under Title I of ADA, the disability rights organizations

prevailed upon the Congress to pass ADA Amendments Act in the year 2008 so as to nullify the

decision of the Supreme Court. Continued activism and legislative lobbying for change and

Disability rights in United States have been enjoyed through several significant federal laws

Barriers Act of 1968 which provided accessibility standard for facilities funded by federal

agency, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which prohibited discrimination by federal

P a g e | 4

agencies, and Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Section 504 of

programs and employment and by federal contractors and grant recipients effective, section 504

of this act applied these rules to all activities that are funded by federal money. Education for All

Handicapped Children Act of 1975 said that students with disabilities must have protection under

the provision of a Free Appropriate Public Education with any necessary accommodation that

will be in the least restrictive environment possible for the child. Partially based on the objectives

of the Rehabilitation Act, the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 came with

additional mandates for key areas of public life; it imposed fresh requirements to embodied

accessibility of buildings, barred discrimination via private sector employers and providers of

private facilities and services, and telecommunications; although telecommunication was not

completely included in the Rehabilitation Act. The ADA required the provision of ‘reasonable

judiciary that has determined the degree to which the visions of these policies have been

realized. Therefore, it is crucial to appraise the practical utility of disability legislation in practice

and out. While some improvements have been achieved, there remains disparities between

legally protected rights granted to persons with disabilities and the actual situation in the country

where over 60 million people with disabilities live. This means continued public advocacy to get

P a g e | 5

Congress to follow through on its expressed aims of a national policy “to eliminate

enforceable provisions” and policies “to integrate into all facets of American Society” the

disabled persons.

1.3 International frameworks (e.g., UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities)

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities signed in 2006 is

another significant international document that has the purpose of safeguarding and promoting

and cultural rights and specific obligations of States Parties to ensure those rights for the citizens

with disability, as well as, developing the articles that outline the principles of participation,

accessibility, equality and inclusion for the persons with disabilities and identify the ways to

improve policies and practices in the spheres of education, justice, health, vote, employment

etc. For example, the Convention provides that States parties shall ensure that persons with

disabilities are consulted through their representatives when implementing or carrying out an

assessment of the implementation of the Convention. Also, the instrument offers

recommendations on the legislations that needs to be enacted or reviewed to promote, prohibiting

discrimination against, and enhancing accessibility and provision of services to persons with

physical, sensory, intellectual and psychosocial disabilities. Considering disability as a human

P a g e | 6

rights issue, the Convention aims that in the countries, the States should eliminate discrimination

disability must promote and protect the inherent dignity and personal autonomy of every person

which includes the right to make one own decision. There has been 93 signatories and 182

ratifications of the UN Convention since 2006 and thus, one of the ways to measure the

organization’s success of this treaty is the extent to which countries ratified and implemented the

conventions’ requirements.

1.4 Intersectionality in disability legislation

from each other; instead, they are interconnected systems that create distinct forms of

oppression. Evaluating the effectiveness of disability legislation entails answering the question of

how disability legislation addresses intersectionality of disability with other aspects of identity.

For instance, Black women must face both ableism and sexism, and in so doing, they suffer from

the intersectionality of prejudice. Therefore, there is a concern in comprehending the

intersectionality of disability legislation to enhance the bases for its support. This type of

legislation is truly more comprehensive in addressing the needs of disabled people and captures

more of the nuances in Diversity within the disability population instead of portraying

disablement as a monolithic experience. Consequently, effective policy can no longer rely on a

P a g e | 7

model that merely looks at disability as a singular category, but must instead seek to map its

Applying intersectionality means shifts in policy measures, Other ways that women, this time

within the context of intersectionality, can challenge systems of oppression are as follows:

Intersectionality legislation would compare and redress injustices that are created at

intersectionality, such as black and other POCs with disabilities being killed by the police more

than whites with disabilities. It would also recognize disability worsened by poverty, disabled

people with limited access to health care due to immigration status, disabled and queer youth

homelessness, etc. Specifying such intersections of identity and oppression opens up the chance

for dismantling oppression through policy better than applying the same treatment to all due to

2005 Disability Act, which banned discrimination based on intersecting grounds, is cited as

positive development, however, the critics point out that the practical application of this principle

P a g e | 8

together with the representation of disabled people of various genders, colors, and sexual

of services to the disabled people since their needs are diverse and complex.

1.5 Key stakeholders in disability policy

Disability policy is pertinent to several main stakeholder groups that have both the responsibility

to inform legislation and the obligation to assess the policy’s impact. The major stakeholders

include first and foremost the disabled people themselves and the organizations fighting for their

Another stakeholder group is disability lawyers and legal clinics who are in direct contact and

work with legal policies that exists to protect disabled persons, find out the flaws in the policies

and advocate for change or new laws. As a result, they are able to see the problems which

disabled people encounter when they attempt to assert their rights and may be able to offer legal

accessibility of disabled student populations.

P a g e | 9

On the government side, both the law and individual policymakers in disability-related agencies

implementation. Statistics bodies maintain dossiers containing such indicators as the occurrence

rate of disability and disability outcome indicators to compare progress. Departmental councils

and cross sector partnerships also ensure that knowledge transfer between departments is

effective in creating integrated evidence-based practices. NGOs and advisory boards offer an

informed and independent third-party policy opinion and program assessment derived from

empirical studies and stakeholders’ surveys. These stakeholders, from different angles, define the

setup and efficiency of such laws through dual advocacy, evaluation, and monitoring

responsibilities.

2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES

and other methods, which measures pre- and post-implementation employment rate, income, and

accessibility compliance scores for disability laws. Semi structured interviews and focus groups

offer a proscriptive account of people with disabilities and how they are affected by these

changes in aspects such as the Employment, Transport, Health, and Education amongst others.

Effectiveness measures of AASMP should therefore use quantitative measures such as

employment figures and quantitative measures together with qualitative views from the disabled

persons to tell whether the legislative goals of encouraging inclusion and eradicating

discrimination are being met. The mixed method data collection in the methodological

triangulation offers the strength of a diverse approach towards an analysis. For instance, a large-

scale, nationally representative longitudinal survey could monitor changes in the overall levels of

P a g e | 16

and affirmation models. Since the evaluators are not persons with disabilities themselves, they

implementation and dissemination stages to ensure that everything done is purposeful and

accountable. Ensuring that people affected by policies under review participate in evaluating the

policies enable them to participate in the evaluation frameworks that affects them, as a result, the

use of participatory action frameworks. Finally, again the evaluators have to evaluate ethical

issues of such studies in light of the professional ethical codes and the disability community

standards. Procedures alone are insufficient; one must perform policy assessments and

evaluations in a manner that one would want to prevent further oppression of marginalized

groups of people.

2.5 Participatory research methods involving the disability community

approaches which see people with disability as objects of study, participatory methods involve

them as active subjects – from the formulation of research questions to the collection of data,

analysis of findings and the dissemination of results. This is in contrast to conventional AA

research practice whereby individuals with disabilities are largely presented as mere objects of

study, rather than agents who have knowledge that comes out of living with disability. Some of

the participatory methods that are widely used include in-depth interviews, focus groups,

participatory workshops, photovoice projects, and community Based participatory action

research. Tasked under the guidance of non-disabled allies, participants can identify necessary

tasks, concerns, and discussions; develop themes and theories from real-life scenarios; and reveal

sociopolitical arrangements and, in addition, applications. For example, organising photovoice

P a g e | 17

projects where persons with disabilities are given cameras to capture what they consider as

failed the disabled. From focus group discussions or community accessibility mapping

workshops, implementing agencies can bring light to the discrepancies between legal

frameworks and operational realities. By adopting inclusive and participatory approaches, the

assumptions of powerlessness of persons with disabilities is also dispelled. It also results in more

rich, genuine and productive forms of assessment that can have a real impact on those policy

changes – as opposed to assessments made within the confines of an academic bubble.

Fundamentally, participatory approaches recognize that individuals who have been affected by

disability laws must have a formative task in evaluating the effectiveness of the laws. This

displacement of power to appreciate and amplify marginalized voices and experience actually

results in improved challenging of paradigms, and more realistic understanding and search for

While assessing the role of disability rights legislation, it is imperative to consider the change

that it has brought in the society in relation to different dimensional planes. Increasingly, the

methodological challenge that replaces a crude orientation toward whether a given law

‘enhances’ rights protection is a more searching one: identifying the nuances of disability-

subjugating work that occur at the level of lived experience. For example, it could reasonably be

said that the purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was to lower the level of

discrimination and increase the possibility of access. However, some critiques argued that its

P a g e | 18

employment provisions diluted the impact and negatively, affected disabled employment levels

studied only through complex causal chains employing methodological frameworks derived from

the disability theories and models. More specifically, impact analysis also means distinguishing

between the symbolic power of legislation and its instrumental power. A law may signal the

appreciation of the disability community via the use of words such as inclusion or accessibility

while actually translating to little to no change in management policies, outcome, participation,

or experience of the disability community. This can be achieved through a diligent process of

mapping as well as the use of mixed-methods where concrete effects can be easily distinguished

from non-concrete ones. Impact evaluation also requires cross-cutting considerations of the

differences with regard to the type of disability, race, gender, generation, and other dimensions of

differentiation. Some subgroups cannot be seen as living under the same conditions if legislation

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) do state

that employers are obliged to make reasonable accommodations for the employees known to

have disabilities so that they could perform the duties of their positions. Examples of

accommodations include; flexible time schedules, job redesign, special equipment and devices,

P a g e | 19

and barrier free buildings or structures. Assessment measures for measuring effectiveness include

accommodation that were offered to the employees, number of employees who remained or left

following the provision of the accommodation and finally the employee performance data. A

collection of surveys and interviews about the satisfaction of the accommodation process and the

accessibility of the work environment offers qualitative information.

Tenet implementation of accommodation means that employers and employees have to work.

Employer costs may include equipment acquisition, and changes, extra oversight or education,

and wages for new employees. However, advantages like, employee benefits in terms of

retaining star performers, increase in organizational productivity and customer/ community

motivation to compliance, effects are conditional to interpretation and enforcement which

remains sensitive to staffing in agencies handling complaints on noncompliance.

P a g e | 20

contribute valuable data about the nature of the job, its core tasks, and employer’s readiness to

government resources can help is when organizations have problems with implementation. It is

argued that progress depends on how parties balance the costs, capabilities as well as legal

requirements in order to develop more inclusive workplaces.

IDEA requires that children with disabling conditions be given free education in an environment

the students.

Further analysis has explored whether the integration of students with disabilities in regular

classes and classrooms foster true inclusion, positive peer relationships, and effective learning

for students, or not. Other qualitative assessment data can complement those numbers such as the

time facilitates the tracking of changes in outcomes over time.

P a g e | 21

Other forms of progression which include examination of advancement through grades as well as

the same way as it reveals how well special education services and facilities aid in

matriculation. Analyzing the outcomes to determine if there are significant inequalities that

Affect disadvantaged groups enables investigation into whether more legal measures or

enhancement of legal requirements to enhance equity in access and participation are required.

When legislators and policymakers are using mixed method data and data triangulation, they are

then in a position to assess the worthwhile impact of laws such as IDEA in fostering learning

environments that students with disabilities feel welcomed, and which also provide the necessary

encouragement and assistance for students to succeed academically.

3.3 Accessibility in public spaces and transportation

some gaps that might be observed, particularly when it comes to using newer technologies.

Determining where progress has or has not been made enough is necessary to move forward with

increasing equality.

They have made it easier to have wheelchair ramps, automatic doors, elevators, wider pathways,

more than 80 percent of the users are content with the changes made in the physical environment

of civic structures.

P a g e | 22

Nevertheless, a high rate of development of the new technologies is also the new challenges.

transit vehicles, scooter shares, and autonomous vehicles (AV). Their companies say that they are

trying to introduce accessibility options for wheelchair users, but they fail to deliver on the

promises. Other functionalities that have been relocated to touch screens, mobile applications,

and digital kiosks for transit payments, dispensers of restroom amenities and towels, parking

meters, and many other purposes also present a great difficulty to the blind or those unable to

manage small controls. Increasing the coverage of ADA Title IV for telecommunications related

applications could encourage development of technology suitable for more disabilities.

Still, more can be done because of ADA requirements which led to great progress; however, the

community welfare and their employment opportunities and reduce the quality of life for

disabled persons. The ADA provides a solid platform; the culture of protecting against and

3.4 Healthcare access and quality for individuals with disabilities

legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, which has improved access and banned

discrimination, the health care system’s barrier remains a serious problem that restricts options

P a g e | 23

and results in worse outcomes. Consumers with mobility impaired concerns still have difficulties

communication hinders the disabled with sensory/ intellectual impairments in expressing their

wants and understanding the lines of treatment. And stereotypical beliefs held by some care

providers that disability equals diminished quality of life, which in turn results in less frequent

and less aggressive preventive and life-sustaining health care.

Efforts to gather systematic data to understand the failures in healthcare delivery for the disabled

are still fragmented and thus, quality improvement measures for targeted specific subgroups are

hard to achieve. Part of the investigation reveals that there is limited utilization of primary care

practitioners among the disability-eligible Medicaid enrollees than among other beneficiaries,

argument in laws.

P a g e | 24

comprehensive assessment is needed to understand the actual direct health care costs that people

targeting as they are the most affected by skewed employment and earnings

prospects. Subsequent evaluation can differentiate whether the deficits are arising from problems

in legislative frameworks or development of care delivery, thus informing where the corrective

action should be focused.

3.5 Social security and disability benefits systems

of the 2010s to address the growing program expenses in the United States had negative effects:

some research shows that thousands of deserving disabled people lost their benefits. Fractional

and qualitative analyses of rejection ratios, average time taken between application and decision

making, significant changes in represented impairment and average amount of payout can help

determine that whether the strings attached essentially targeted the deceitful applicants as

planned or denied deserving, deserving disabled citizens a raw deal. Such methods as matching

comparison to evaluate the impact of changes of disability systems, which compares a set of data

before and after a policy change while taking into account control variables such as age or

gender of the disabled people, enable the lawmakers to look past political rhetoric and make

sound scientific decisions on future reforms. They also make it possible to pinpoint specific areas

P a g e | 25

of improvement- for instance, the 2005 Australian reform that sought to cut long processing time

was not the best solution, but operational changes. Substantial impact evaluations that explain

the causes of initial problems can transform disability benefits systems into better working

systems, rather than furthering ill-advised policies that add to the original issues.

This therefore presents serious difficulties in terms of compliance with and implementation of

implementation. Some of the known barriers include; uncertainty concerning the legal

provisions, costs of implementing accommodations, and scarcity of strict mechanisms for

enforcement.

Assessing the effectiveness of disability legislation for analyzing the real-world experience must

identified disabled peoples’ feedback, and status of audits and inspections, and a review of the

discrepancy between the letter of the law and policy implementation. This evaluation can help to

P a g e | 32

alignment of public and private sectors enabled the proper implementation and enforcement of

Disability Rights legislation compliance and implementation challenges are often met by various

compliance and implementation problems, however, utilizing technology and innovative

solutions, there are vast opportunities for improvements. New technologies, for instance, are

physically altering environments in order to allow the disabled to engage in societies’ activities

promising to securely keep track of compliance data and identify where issues exist to address

them more effectively. Champions of new digital technologies such as VR and AR could also

potentially reduce the real-world hurdles that stand in the way of providing universal access. As

much as technology cannot address social issues that need legislation for the disabled,

innovations that are designed to integrate, showcase and document legal integration is an

effective way of removing the marginalization of the disabled persons. Such tools may even have

the potential of altering perceptions within society at large, by demonstrating that individuals

with disability are capable of certain things and can consequently function in more integrated

ways. Technology and innovation cannot transform a society and make it more legalistic on their

own, it is an issue that requires the society to embrace the institutions. However, strategic

P a g e | 33

integration and enhancement of technological tools are capable of providing a tangible solution

enhance the critical social rationality underlying the disability legislation. The full potential

therefore lies untapped and firmly dependent on focused research and development of assistive

interfaces and accommodations conceived with disabled people in mind and not the accidental or

afterthought use cases, to show transformed options, assert compliance, and change the disability

narrative in spaces and workplaces.

5. FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

levels might be helpful in attaining a complete picture. Also, if disability legislation evaluation is

seen as a continuous quality improvement process rather than a basic ‘checking and telling’

process, then more useful feedback conversations can emerge. When there are clearly defined

criteria for the evaluation of changes over time, politicians will be in a much better position to

fine-tune policies and provisions in relation to laws and regulations to increase participation of

disabled people. Similarly, evaluation mechanisms should incorporate more diverse inputs by

various stakeholders – and there is nothing more crucial than giving voice to disabled advocates

to counterbalance policymakers’ presumptions. These constituencies’ experiences must be heard

to understand which legal domains are nearly impossible or which rights are not easily translated

into actual experiences of access and opportunity. Altogether, these three elements of evaluation

P a g e | 34

could contribute to the enhancement of the effectiveness of disability legislation by increasing

greater capacity to pinpoint successes in order to build upon them and barriers to address,

evaluation would assist policymakers in developing laws that address disability rights and

equality in a way that is more relevant to the issues at hand. Additionally, framing participation

assessment as an iterative process that works to reduce participation gaps might be useful for

constructing trust and cooperation toward implementing policy goals. With such

recommendations and in the tone of improvement, evaluation can be an enabling tool for

enhancing disabled lives through legislation.

5.1 Identifying gaps in current disability legislation

sensitivity for the various dimensions within the disability populations – there is no distinction

between different types of disabilities or between individual disabled persons. Future action by

the parliaments must address the fact that disability is a continuum, whether in terms of the

underlying conditions, functional impact, or need for assistance. Similarly, the majority of

disability laws rely on a formal legal definition of disability that is linked solely with the loss of

physical and mental functions of the person. This fails to account for the fact that disability is not

only experienced in the body, but also discrimination from society and the environment. To this

end, the legislation should be amended to engender a more social model approach where

accommodations aim solely at eradicating exclusionary aspects in physical environment

provisions, communication media, and services.

P a g e | 35

Furthermore, emerging legal precedents have highlighted doubts relating to the extent of internet

almost anything else, consumers use technology to access information and services, so cohesive

cyber accessibility laws are necessary. Web content and interface design standards can therefore

not just be best practice guidelines, they have to be clear, encompassing and prescriptive.

Moreover, the current policy discourses over-emphasize the physical/sensory impaired –

excluding the group of intellectual/developmental impaired and mental health affected

individuals. There should be more intersectional approaches in future directives to describe

complex barriers associated with different types of disability and the corresponding solutions.

Shade there is still reasonable doubt as to what is required of employers and educators in terms

policies, and harmonization of reporting systems would enhance control and

responsibility. There is a conspicuous absence of comprehensive measures toward proper

P a g e | 36

5.2 Comparative analysis of international disability policies

across different countries to find out which policies need to be borrowed in order to promote

further improvement. Looking at the strategies in different countries in different development

level can offer some inspiration and ideas to emulate as well as mistakes to avoid, for instance,

some of the LDMs are embracing comprehensive family based community support systems that

ensure individuals with disability are allowed to stay with their families rather than being put in

facilities. They make people with disabilities part of society and foster the ability of families to

take care of such individuals. Exploring the cost-benefit and social impact aspects can reveal

whether the same programs could complement enacting legislation in other countries. On the

other hand, countries that have already established a relatively developed disability policies like

enhance efficiency. Some ideas for critical investigation are the definition of disability, exact

definition of what is considered reasonable, promotion of accessibility in organizations and

institutions, and rules on penalties in case of violations. Some European and Asian countries

have added or proposed more categories for disabled people, required accessibility standards and

established enforcement systems which can be studied to assess the possibility of applying in the

US or other countries that currently lack such provisions. Furthermore, the European

Accessibility Act lays down accessibility standards in product design which might be followed

by other legislation. Such cross-country comparison on multiple facets of disability legislation,

while using input from the disabled communities and policy makers across the world, can indeed

offer valuable information for furthering the cause of disabled citizens and resulting in improved

P a g e | 37

5.3 Emerging issues in disability rights (e.g., digital accessibility, genetic discrimination)

that is likely to affect the disability group in future and which should therefore inform policy

making for future. One of the important domains is that of Web accessibility, with the focus on

equal opportunities in the use of information technologies and Web sites for disabled

people. Although there is growth, there are issues especially when web sites, applications, and

other resources which are not developed with the inclusion of accessibility features as a part of

the design process. The following recommendations should be made to the policymakers: New

and updated regulations and technical standards for both public and private sectors should be

provided that makes digital accessibility a development, procurement, and testing requirement.

Other enhancements of accessibility might also come from the technology companies

these should include tools for accountability such as digital accessibility audits and reporting.

despite the lack of clear manifestations of the condition. Although, the ACA prevents health

insurers from using the genetic test results to justify exclusion, gaps in the employment and other

spheres of life’s aspects remain open. It is needed to remove the discrimination on the basis of

genetic characteristics while allowing the significant advances in medical research to happen due

P a g e | 38

matters of genetic discrimination as it falls under general disability training. The follow-up

and advocacy campaigns when making an evaluation of the impact of legislation.

While emerging technologies create possibilities for rethinking disability and human difference

as well as possibilities for their erasure, strategies of universal design, access, and health equity

are necessary. Concerns such as algorithm and AI bias, and the AI application in disability

assessments also require further regulatory examination. This piece concludes that through the

adoption of early systematic and research-based actions to influence the positive advancement of

technology and halt the practice of discrimination based on genetics, significant progress towards

the protection of disability rights can be achieved. While the actual assessment of policy

Policymakers need to embed disability legislation effectiveness with evidenced-based reforms

that seek to identify which policies and programs really help to advance the wellbeing of

universities, and disability advocacy groups where the research findings can be produced and

integrated to inform policy-making processes and ensure that the bills that are being proposed

P a g e | 39

contain the best evidence currently available. More specifically, the federal government should

located in a few selected universities that are chosen in a way that is similar to the Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention Research Centers program. These centers would perform

research that is cross-cutting, for instance, on aspects such as the trends in disability prevalence

and need, the barriers to access in different sectors including education and employment, the

effectiveness of existing policies and models of service delivery at certain levels of analysis, and

implications of various proposed reform strategies for both the short and long terms. Officials

could then ask the centres for research briefs that reflect the anticipated costs, impacts and

possibly perverse effects of policy interventions as they formulate or consider new or modified

disability policies legislation and the centres could provide accurate scientific data in response to

the request. To strengthen the connection between research and policy practice, student

evidence-based policymaking in response to the most recent and robust research findings on

what is effective in the promotion of the rights, human dignity, and quality lives of every

disabled individual.

P a g e | 40

5.5 The future of disability legislation in a changing social and technological landscape

disabled will have to be changed to reflect the society and technology of today. AI, advanced

robotics, virtual/augmented reality and other emerging technologies maybe hold new potential

for greater access, inclusion and independence but have potential for reinforcing ableism where

new technologies are not designed and governed with this issue in mind. Policy makers should

anticipate how new mainstream technologies can enhance the lives of people with disabilities by

making the technologies more accessible, providing tailored interfaces for people with

disabilities, reducing barriers through predicting them, etc. Policy makers must also consider the

negative impact of new technologies and eliminate them by ensuring they are prohibited legally

or regulated by agencies that oversee such issues, certified with protocols that prioritize universal

to the ADA-model will need to extend into the digital realm by recognizing exclusion from

virtual spaces or activities based on disability as a form of unlawful discrimination. It also

necessitates the stronger and more consistent indicators to measure laws’ effectiveness, tracking

them over time, and their effects on employment, poverty, education, health, and other aspects of

life affecting people’s quality of life – all of these findings to feed into the legislators’ continuous

refinement of the system. Those involved in policy making should consider following disability

rights in other countries as a way of identifying models that may be implemented in their home

country. They also need to recognize the evolving social paradigm shift concerning the disabled

– more specifically the rising voices from the disability rights movement insisting on the rights

of the disabled as citizens, not just as human bodies with disabilities but as citizens equal to

P a g e | 41

accessibility/accommodations beyond mere adequacy. In the future years, the success of

be pathfinders and advocates rather than consumers and imitators while creating timely laws in

terms of the technological progress and shifting perception of disability.