P a g e | 1
REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAMS: SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES
1. INTRODUCTION TO REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT
Refugee resettlement refers to the process whereby refugees are assisted to rebuild their lives in
another country, after they have been driven out of their countries in their own
countries. Refugee programs are lifesavers as human displacement and refuges witness an
escalation due to conflict, climate change and other imbalance prospects. Nevertheless, there is
much more to be done to bring the conditions for a better and more independent way of living of
the refugees as well as the adaptation and integration process within the culture and the society
of the country receiving refugees.
The reception programs are thought to cover the refugees essential and exigent needs for
shelter, food and medical aid immediately they enter a country. There are employment services,
language and skill development and financial assistance for early employment as it is
possible. The acculturation process is a gradual one and the current efforts are intended to
present the clients with options available regarding health services and transportation, education,
and legal matters. This is supported by a network of government at different tiers, NGOs and the
stakeholders within the broader society which in this case, being the mediators between refugees
and wider functioning systems.
However, the refugees are provided for in terms of the basics by the host nation; their overall
absorption remains severely hindered by several other factors such as the high cost of housing,
poor language acquisition of the host nation, employment prejudice and unrecognition of work
experience earned in the refugees’ home country. They can hinder refugee’s freedom of
movement, and completely prevent him/her from moving in some directions. On the
P a g e | 2
programming side there are also shortcoming in terms of funding and/or implementation
capacities of policies that would further the long-term inclusion and support. In the light of such
an approach, the insights regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the current refugee
resettlement systems could be useful in order to determine possible shift and improvement.
Overall, the refugee integration means opportunities in economic, social and political domains
for refugees and citizens in host societies in order to be and become.
- Definitions and Key Concepts
Resettlement entails helping refugees to transit from the asylum country, to another country,
which has agreed to host the refugees legally. Some definite concepts that are crucial to
associates with corporations referring to refugee resettlement are refugee, asylum, asylum
seekers, internally displaced people (IDPs), countries of resettlement, and durable solutions. In
order to qualify as a refugee, he/she must be a person who has left his/her country of nationality
or country of habitual residence for the purpose of avoiding persecution due to race, religion,
nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group as defined under the
1951United Nations’ convention. An asylum seeker is thus a person who is seeking refugee
status although the refugee status application has not been granted. Asylum has come to mean the
status which is accorded to a person by a given state. When individuals are forced to flee their
homes for their safety but remain within the boundaries of their country, they become Internally
Displaced Persons (IDPs) and cannot be regarded as refugees who can be relocated to another
country but could get assistance. The promise keeping countries are those which permanently
shelter refugees or have signed to share the global responsibility on refugees. UNHCR and
governments look for the three principles for refugees which are known as the three durable
P a g e | 3
solutions which include; voluntary repatriation back to the country of origin, naturalization in the
country of asylum and resettlement to a third country.
At present, there are more than 25. Four million refugees in the world, with the resettlement
being the only vital humanitarian tool to help the most vulnerable refugees, given that
approximately 0. Only 01% of the refugees of the global population can be resettled
permanently. Some of the challenges that are associated with Refugee Resettlement are
distribution of refugees in a new country, integration in new socio-economic and cultural setting
and security because refugees may have been exposed to very awful experiences or interrupted
education; handling locals’ resentment towards refugees who they consider to be a burden; and
orientation towards success over generations not just early years only. The contents of the course,
topics regarding refugee resettlement programs, involve concern with the above-overviewed
approaches designed at helping the refugees to regain independence and integrate into the society
and access health, language, education and vocational services and, in the same respect, focus on
the issue of welfare benefit misuse. It gives policy recommendation on issues such as admission
criteria for refugee status, examines domestic law processes concerning the treatment of resettled
refugees and evaluates refugees image and media influence on political will for acceptance of
refugees and fosters positive community and institutional practice for acceptable refugee
resettlement. It also examines the prejudice and bias and ethical issues in determining
admissibility of refugees.
- Global Refugee Trends and Statistics
These have risen in each following year up to the current approximately 82,000,000 of the
Internally Displaced, Refugees, Asylum Seekers and other Forced Migrants. 4 million refugees
as per the UNHCR by end of the year 2020. From this total, 6 are miles per year per civil service
P a g e | 4
employee. 3 million internally displaced persons, 4. Three million Palestinian refugees and 26.
respectively 4 million refugees – and on both accounts, the numbers are record-high. Syrian,
Venezuela, Afghan, South Sudan and Myanmar are the source countries from where more or less
seven out of every ten refugees of the world hail from. The political instabilities and wars in
these countries have not come to an end and the cyclical pain in these nations has put asylum
seekers in a continuous run in the quest of finding shelter in foreign territories.
Other than refugees, there are 48 million persons displaced internally due to violence,
persecution or violation of rights. Studies reveal the world displaced populace comprised of
about 42% kids below 18 years of age. These three regions of the developing world – Sub-
Saharan Africa, Middle East and South Asia are home to nearly 86 per cent of the global
refugees. The fact that to date there are 3,601,091 Syrian refugees in Turkey, it can be mentioned
that Turkey remains the only country that hosts more refugees than all the other countries in the
world.
Even when a small number of such refugees are to be resettled it requires a lot of political will
and/or capital investment from the host country. The developed nations must open their doors to
take more of them; to date, they merely host a few percentages of the global refugees as
illustrated below. In the present day, or at present, the entirety of refugees and the problem for
those who must host and assist them, are primarily in the possession of low- and middle-income
countries that are adjacent to the primary fields of conflict. With the current exploding and
growing numbers of refugees, the humanitarian system has no sufficient capacity to
accommodate yet more refugees who wish to live better lives in other countries of the world.
International cooperation through foreign assistance; changes in policy; inter and intra
state/international diplomacy; and investment in integration programs are important to meet legal
P a g e | 5
and ethical requirements in averting the suffering of the most vulnerable in conflict and war
situations which are not of their own making. The scale of people forced to leave their homes is
rising every year and its grow is directly linked to the core problem of helping refugees and
offering then a practically decent life.
- Overview of Refugee Resettlement Processes
The process of the refugee resettlement involves several steps – the refugees have to be
identified and registered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in
the state of which, the person applies for refuge. UNHCR then evaluates the person in regard to
legal status of international refugee, which means that one must be able to demonstrate a well-
founded fear of persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or
membership in a particular social group. Assuming refugee status has been established, the
UNHCR works to develop three possible solutions: to be returned to their country of origin by
way of voluntary repatriation, as soon as it is practicable, integration in the country of asylum or
resettlement in the third country where the first two solutions cannot be applied. With regard to
third-country resettlement, the UNHCR officers in the field have refugee resettlement
registration, which allows them to select and recommend the refugees with the greatest need for
referral to the countries with reference resettlement programs. The referred refugee also has to sit
for an eligibility check that includes criminal records check, medical, security clearance, a DNA
sample, and having to sit for an interview by officials of possible resettlement countries. In
countries where they are allowed, the non-profit organizations arrange for pre-departure briefings
and means of transport to the country of deployment. The refugee enters through a humanitarian
mode of entry and is granted humanitarian parole, upon their arrival the refugee undergoes the
initial assessment, meets the requirements for, and is briefed on the laws, language,
P a g e | 6
transportation, job opportunities and all the humanitarian assistance available for Legal
Permanent Resident. Such refugees receive from the resettlement agency emergency and basic
needs shelter, cash and medical assistance, receives initial and elaborate case management
services to and with regards to employment options, language classes, children’s schools,
cultural orientation, volunteers and paid community integration, and immigration legal services
for green cards and naturalization if eligible.
- Historical Context of Refugee Resettlement
Refugee and displaced people movement is not a strange concept that has cropped up in the last
centuries as people recorded movement of refugees returning to their countries. Though, based
on the occurrences that followed the second World War there was noted rise in the refugee and
Internally-displaced persons and resettlement movements. Migration due to war across the
continent accompanied by new conflicts in the wake of decolonialization or the Cold war
ensured that there were millions of refugees who needed assistance and /or re- settlement. The
preceding inter- governmental actions regarding population of refugees subsequent to the world
war I have led to the emergence of new instruments and organizations regarding refugees’
protection and assistance. Some of the significant milestones that took place were: In 1950 was
adopted the United Nations Office for the High Commissioner for Refugees based on the 1951
convention and the 1967 protocol, which for the first time granted international legal recognition
and certain rights to the persons holding the status of refugees. Hitherto, these steps facilitated
the establishment of the broader framework for registration and help of refugees, victims of
persecution, violence and armed conflict. Refugee camps and displaced persons’ resettlement
that were set initially in Europe since the World War II carried refugee populations and the reset
McMansions forward in the second half of the twentieth century with regional wars and
P a g e | 7
humanitarian disasters in the developing countries. These Refugee policies and capacities in
nations such as the United States were built in this historical scenario of emergence of refugee
movements and the process of formulation of international resettlement which historians opine
influences the current Refugee policy dialogues and Resettlement work today’s discourse and
considerations of program capabilities, funding and opportunities for economic and social
inclusion, health care and cultural orientation.
- International Legal Frameworks
The rules pertaining to refugees and the reception of refugees in the international arena are
approved by the 1951 refugee Convention and the 1967 protocol to such Convention. At present
145 members of the convention that describes who is a refugee, their, protection, and work and
responsibilities of the state for refugees. One of the principles is the principle of non-
refoulement, which is an idea that can’t reject refugees back to the territories in which they face
the risk of being exposed to death or imprisonment. These are the convention and protocol that
forms the basis why other countries have the duty to protect those who migrate because of
persecution and conflict back in their countries.
With regard to refugees there is no right in the law of international human rights where refugees
in asylum countries can be resettled to other countries. Resettlement is one of the three
‘sustainable solutions’ of refugees with the primary concern of voluntary repatriation and local
integration but it is a rare practice since it can only be applied where the other two are deemed
unachievable. Refugees may be allowed into a country on a resettlement basis and over 25 states
have got a resettlement system. The main management for the Resettlement process worldwide is
done by the UN Refugee Agency known as UNHCR and has helped in the resettlement of over 3
P a g e | 8
million refugees to date. They screen refugees’ cases and find out those that fit the criteria of
resettlement according to the level of risk and forward the same to governments.
When refugees are resettled, there are legal obligations on the receiving country to help them
find their feet in that economy. However, specific integration policies and outcomes vary greatly
cross-nationally because of the different social services and immigrants’ interpretation of them in
the resettlement country. Some of the sign of integration for refugees are; shelter or housing,
employment, health facility, education and fluency in the language of the new society. This is
made easy because the agencies that are involved in the resettlement of refugees encourage them
to be productive citizens on their own. When such programs are comprehensive and offer an
opportunity to the refugees to triumph, the act of resettlement shields some of the most
vulnerable beings in the world.
- Course Objectives and Structure
The proposed course, Introduction to Refugee Resettlement, aims at educating students on how
to evaluate the refugee problem in the world and resettlement practices. The course will examine
why people have to become refugees, how they escape, how the world treats refugee situations,
and approaches to managing refugee resettlement in host nations. The course runs for 12 weeks
and incorporates lectures, discussions, case studies and guest speakers with the following
objectives: To make sure that the methods of presenting definitions, facts and statistics and legal
and policy data on forced migration and refugee resettlement are clear and concise. This is
important as he assumes that students interested in his work already know the information he
details and it provides background information for the students. The course then progresses from
these premises to evaluate crucial issues such as health determinants in displacement, refugee
women and children, the process of refugee status determination and its moral challenges,
P a g e | 9
security, and cultural contexts of the resettlement countries. The final segment of the course aims
at introducing the programs, policies, and services associated with refugee resettlement in our
country. Read about the purpose and goals of governmental and non-governmental organizations
involved in the process of resettlement, phases of integration starting from arrival up to
citizenship, the signs of good integration and what has not been accomplished yet. Ideally, such
objectives are to equip the students with theoretical and empirical understanding on the analysis
of the strategies of resettlement of refugees, the strengths and weaknesses of the specific
programs, policies or services that may facilitate integration of refugees. In order to accomplish
the learning objectives assigned to the case, through experience and discussion with those who
work directly with refugees and policymaker students acquire multiple learning opportunities
which is aimed at: introducing them to basic issues of forced migration and refugee resettlement,
the programs directed to assist with integration of refugees into the society and finally – the
assessment of current approaches in the field and idea of some improvements. The course
refugee resettlement programs: successes and failures help apply the knowledge gained in the
introductory course to improve the assessment
2. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORKS
The refugee legal and policy frameworks for resettlement contain a plethora of mechanisms
besides having various challenges and prospects for resettlement. One of the main supports is the
1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol which defines who is a refugee, what rights
refugees should be accorded and the duties of states. The signatory states undertake not to send
refugees back to a situation where their lives or liberty will be in danger. And it is this rather
principle of non-refoulement that provides such important safeguard. They also relate to the
principles of resettlement such, offering refugees homes, schools, hospitals, employment and
P a g e | 10
means to seek an immigration status. What is special about the Refugee Convention is that
enforcement mechanisms utilizing states parties’ commitments are not robust when these states
do not effectively enforce their commitments. Similarly, domestic legislation and policies that
developed from the Convention rights and guaranteeing specific cases of integration not
envisioned by the Convention are vital for successful resettlement, the possibility to attend
language courses, job training and finding affordable housing. An example of such a law is the
law on the process of resettlement from 1980 – the U. S Refugee Act that to this day determines
some of the procedures of resettlement, such as the medical examination abroad and the first aid
after arrival in the United States. However domestic policies also act as key barriers to
resettlement. Terrorism measures put after September 11 attack restrained refugee status
determination. Restrictions in money helped to reduce medical clearance and other services after
arrival. Preparation and executing of resettlement programs is another area that experiences a big
influence from this kind of policy change. The management of future legal and policy strategies
striving to mediate the rights of refugees and sovereignty rights of nations, security needs of
states and domestic policy and economic and political implications are thus still highly
politicized though they are still inevitable. The recent European refugee crisis and the problem of
burden sharing mean that there are no international organizations the modern world needs and
the challenges which hamper cooperation between states. One can assume that to build a solid
foundation for the legal and policy framework for the resettlement of refugees, the ways could be
the following: the improvement of more fair burden-sharing arrangements; the engagement of
refugees in the global governance area.
P a g e | 11
- International Conventions and Agreements
Resettlement programs in the host countries are anchored under the international refugee law that
sets out who is a refugee, what rights and protection is accorded, and what obligations of states.
Among these are the; 1951 United Nations convention on the status of refugees and the 1967
protocol which forms the basis of refugee law. They set up significant frames of the refugee
status and protection with 149 states, signing the Convention and the Protocol. Concerning the
liberties mentioned in the Convention, refugees must be granted by the contracting states:
freedom of worship, right to access to courts, right to basic education, right to work, right to
facilitated naturalization. Further, the Convention does not allow refoulement which is the return
of refugees to their own country and where they may be persecuted or face death. First of all, it
should be pointed out that the Convention also envisages the minimum standards of treatment of.
It deals with a number of adopted refugees in areas such as housing, public education, public
relief as well as social security. The instrument provides internationally recognized definition of
a refugee, guarantee of refugee rights that aids in reintegration afterwards, and the legal measures
that states have put in place on the standard of treatment for refugees.
The standard legal regime in the international refugee law is established with the 1951
Convention, but the regional instruments have further developed the provisions of protection to
the refugee and the obligations of the state. For example, the 1969 OAU Convention on Certain
Aspects of Refugee Problems enlarges the refugee definition on a regional basis. It does so,
taking into account the circumstances in Latin America and the Caribbean and taking into
account the provisions of the 1984 Cartagena Declaration. These regional accords indicate
certain changes for the treatment of situations of refugees depending on the conditions of the
region, in some other instances, it is other general human rights conventions that impact on
P a g e | 12
refugee resettlement. The Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women spell out sure rights of refugees who
are resettled based on age and sex. Hence being the regional and international agreements that
afford the increased or selective safeguards, such treaties are one of the substructures of the legal
frameworks that support and govern the refugee placement programs in the world.
- National Refugee Resettlement Policies
There are differences of national refugee policies in a way that some countries are more or less
willing to host refugees than others. Some of the developed countries such as the United States
of America, Canada and Australia have what is known as resettlement programs for those
Refugees who cannot return home for ever. However, they are still measures that limit refugee’s
admission per certain calendar year. Which, as will be noted, most refugee resettlement relates to
only highly skilled people who can be easily absorbed into the community and do not exert much
pressure on public facilities or reunify with their kin in the country. This is based on the
assumption that bulk may compromise social order, security of any nation, and stress the welfare
docket.
But such a policy does not answer moral obligations under 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status
of Refugees and does not serve humanitarian purpose, and cannot replace displacement due to
conflict, persecution or climate change. Greater measure of stewardship is needed especially for
societies to perform according to their capacity needed. Although most of the refugees are settled
in the developing countries, the developed ones require better techniques of admitting and
integrating them legally into societies. It might expand the list of entitlements and requirements,
and improve the sections against discrimination and in favor of affirmative actions; or it might
P a g e | 13
contribute to financing specific NGOs for the refugees which assist them with finding a place to
live, adapting to the new culture, and navigating through the public services.
One program is the European Resettlement Network whose main function is to ensure that there
is sharing of refugee resettlement between EU member countries. However, since it is a
voluntary organization, it is not very efficient because the admission quotas are determined by
the member nations independently of global needs based on their domestic politics. If there is to
be an imperative to build up the necessary integration capacities outside the home country, there
may also be a need to have treaty provisions in addition to aid. Lastly, it is important to
acknowledge that, while fugitives require effective legal and policy frameworks addressing
drives for displacement, they should not be penalized. National policies acting to ensure
powerful border protection and to accept refugees are the indicators of compliance with legal
standards and people’s moral and legal rights and freedoms as well as reacting to the
humanitarian consequences of forced migration.
- Role of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
The UNHCR is the primary international organization with a mandate of providing on refuge
legislation and practices on refugee resettlement. In addition to contributing and sometimes
spearheading the delivery of the protection partnership, it monitors legal tools including the
refugee convention 1951 which defines the refugee status and the obligation of states. It is also
more directly involved in the making of domestic legislation and polices on procedures
governing the provision of asylum, recognition of refugee status and the treatment and
resettlement of refugees. For example, the UNHCR was actively participating in the drafting of
the refugee national law in Asia-Pacific and Latin American countries. It will also publish
handbooks including the UNHCR Resettlement handbook through which it influences the
P a g e | 14
programs and planning of the resettling states. It also jointly convenes the Annual Tripartite
Consultations on Resettlement for the legal and operational reviews. By such interferences the
UNHCR prepares the states for the legal and rightful techniques of assimilation of the refugees
into the respective nations as well as the advancement of self-reliance among the refugee
population.
Regarding particular complements in the area of resettlement, the UNHCR plays the role of a
screener: it has to find out the refugees with protection concerns that would possibly be
candidates for third-country solutions. Its offices carry out interviews with asylum seekers in
order to decide whether or not they are suitable candidates for resettlement and search for cases
which are unlikely to meet quotas in receiving states. The same year refugees the agency
presented for consideration for resettlement in countries in the world number of persons reached
108 400. It also provides cultural information and pre-resettlement services for the people who
fulfill the requirement, to help them for the new culture and society. Moreover, in order to inform
the host States about how to optimize receptions and make them to be more integration
promoting, it also assesses and measures the care and protection, as well as the outcome of
refugees’ resettlement. For example, when Syrian refugees seeking asylum employment
opportunities that they claimed were shut out from the German labor market the UNHCR was
prompted to introduce the policy reform to provide professional recognition and language new
entrants. As a result, the agency through the research and advocacy assists the governments in
the development and enhancement of the settlement of refugees programs for their economic
self-sufficiency and integration into the socio-economic mainstream. Therefore, since UNHCR
help in the formulation and implementation of policies and assists in the integration of the
P a g e | 15
refugees in a resettlement country, it is valuable asset in the coordination and strengthening of
the state’s response to the forced displacement crises in any country.
- Asylum vs. Resettlement: Legal Distinctions
Evidently, while all categories including those who have been granted asylum status, or those
who have been selected for refugee resettlement are popularly called refugees, there are profound
distinctions, especially where the refugee’s preferences and rights under the law is concerned,
between genuine refugees on the one hand, and asylum seekers or would-be refugees on the
other. Asylum may be defined as events where people who have been compelled to flee their
countries because of persecution seek refuge in another country. Asylum seekers have to
demonstrate reasonable, genuine and well-founded fear of being persecuted in their country for
reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.
They are determined on an ad hoc basis and one has to apply from the country of origin for an
asylum status. Resettlement however, involves moving of refugees from an asylum country
which they first relocated to, to a third country of destination that is willing to offer them a
permanent asylum status and that they can apply for citizenship later on. Potential resettlement
refugees are sourced or identified and selected by the governments or UNHCR by reference to
the vulnerability factors.
The major pro of resettlement over asylum is that it usually provides primary legal status along
with the other means of integration. Of course, the idea of global refugee resettlement is
commendable but it shall be realized that the global population of refugees is very high, and the
rate of resettlement by far very low. Currently, only 0. It has been observed that 8% of refugees
are newly reported to UNHCR for the consideration of resettlement in the prior years. This is
seen through conditions that are laid down in the eligibility among organizations to resettle
P a g e | 16
refugees, and the numerical limitations set by the resettlement states. A lot of refugees can be
reached through asylum, even though it is much less achievable than refugees’ reach though
other pathways. But asylum seekers continue suffering vulnerable waiting, detention and an
unknown result. Nevertheless, it is done, moving into a new country is always a challenge in
terms of culture, economy, language and interaction for all refugees.
This is true because the protection of refugees is the action undertaken with encouragement of
moral values under the international conventions, and at the same time, it is the exercise relating
to political factors. Policy solutions should contain human rights and humanitarian principles and
have a coherence that is not contradictory, so as to address cross-sectoral challenges like threats,
illnesses, shortages of staff, stigma and inadequate funding. Problems must be solved with
distinction demanded by evidence, as well as emotions compass understanding, and ethical and
broad view of the society and its help for all interested parties respecting their needs and
opportunities.
- National Security and Immigration Laws
Following September, 11, 2001 the security issues have dominated the immigration laws and
policies of refugees’ resettlement in the United States. Immigration and refugee policies have
been propounded as policies within the same bracket as those that would protect the nation from
security risks from within. These policies have also helped in making false the real asylum
seekers who are in desperate fear of their lives from violence and persecution in their countries to
seek asylum in America. There is no doubt that states’ desire to have effective security systems
stand in contradiction to international human rights and refugee law.
P a g e | 17
In particular, after the so-called 9/11 incidences, the tasks of immigration agencies in terms of
enforcement and screening were expanded. New measures of security and the background check
were adopted for all immigrants and refugees willing to be granted entry into the US. While it is
rational to call for measures of security there is much argument regarding the extent to which the
policies that are taken go to an extent of being extreme. The modern strict security checks are the
significant obstacles and substantial timeframes for the refugees to get protected. For instance,
compare the powers of the U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that are
empowered to reject a refugee or an applicant for asylum; the discrepancies or the gaps in the
story that a refugee or an asylum seeker is going to present before the adjudicator can be trivial,
but the powers of USCIS to reject them on that account are vastly broader. Although purposed to
shut out individuals considered to be security threats, these policies have put a freeze on
affiliation for many genuine asylum seekers.
The data also reveal that sanction for immigration enforcement since the attacks of 9/11 have
been directed towards Muslim and refugees from Muslim majorities countries. Issues related to
different program quotas are relevant for refugees coming from Syria and Yemen because of the
war that is still going on. Opponents of such measures argue that such policies are inhuman and
reduce the United States’ position as a haven for persecuted individuals. What has to be
mentioned is that even though there can be conflicts of interest in situation concerning national
security, this does not mean that the refugee policies have to interfere as well and cannot work in
harmonious and just ways. It is true that, minimizing burdens could have been realized by
exercising such measures as realizing workable quotas and revisiting the screen procedures.
Finally, laws are enacted with policy in mind hence the management of refugees is a security
issues and not an act of assisting the needy. Every or, perhaps, scarcely avoidable argument that
P a g e | 18
can be made in this undeniably complex debate has its pro. That is why preventing forced
migration should remain a priority despite other concerns which are genuine regarding security.
As shall be observed, the better reforms enable the creation of immigration laws that can
effectively ‘filter out the threat’ while providing for safety. Arguing about what the reasonable
security measures should encompass does not mean that people should stay exposed. Thus, the
subject matter of refugee policy should be defined not by the relations between rational USA’s
national security interest and the moral concern of Americans toward refugees.
- Human Rights Considerations in Policy Making
In regard to the proportion of legal and policy issues that relate to refugee resettlement programs,
the issues of conformity to and protection of human rights are topical. Refugees are
automatically a marginal population which flees from war, persecution or other dangerous
conditions and the decisions that are made in the process of their resettlement significantly
predetermine their physical and moral worth as people as well as their opportunities for the
future. It follows that laws and programs must be just, and must be ethical in their respect for the
basic human rights that refugees are, such as the right to asylum, the right to liberty, the right to
life, the right to decent living, the right to education, and the right to equal treatment.
Regarding the matters and concerns including the subjects’ resources and legal contexts, and
potential of integration programs, policy makers should always remember human rights to ensure
the programs will not erode but enhance the refugees’ standing. This implies that it is ethical to
provide policies that offer the refugee basic needs and opportunities in as much as they are being
rehabilitated these are as follows; Health, including psychological health, Employment services,
Language and orientation. Comprehensive and holistic concepts of resettlement foster freedom
of refugees with no restrictions once is resettled. There may normally be challenges on how to
P a g e | 19
support refugees and how to get them to start new lives and be assimilated in the new host
countries; but there is always a way of devising sound policies and measures that can deal with
the challenges but at the same time respect the principles of human rights.
This brought the realization that to fully adopt the human rights-based approach, the refugees
have to be incorporated not only in the formulation of policies but also in the evaluation of the
program outcomes. Their involvement and the reported experiences should be included for only
them can offer realistic data and information about the situation and needs on the ground level.
This entails an engagement of various stakeholders in the decisions making of policies with the
areas of focus for emphasis being identified thus no need for the society to ascertain what is best
for the people or make decisions that lack conception. For the resettlement programs to yield the
intended results and sustainable, improving the health standard and protection of refugees’ rights
cannot be overemphasized as the central theme of the laws and regulations.
3. SELECTION AND PLACEMENT OF REFUGEES
Refugee selection and placement is undoubtedly one of the very fundamental areas which does
have connection with the resettlement programs of refugees. The countries that host refugees and
asylum seekers with the intention of providing them with protection from persecution and
hostilities in their home countries also wish to make the new arrivals contribute to the economic
productivity of the host countries. Therefore, it can be seen that through good choice and the
positioning process, the resettlement programs can attend to the needs of the vulnerable persons.
But at the same time, it is also woven with countless obstacles.
There are various techniques employed by resettlement countries to admit the refugees, and in
the process compromise the achievable objectives of the programs with the particular
P a g e | 20
considerations in the global perspective. Some may be considered more important – the
endangered women and children, those who are sick and have no time to die of illness, some
ethnical group in this or that country exterminated by another one. Although, background check
provides the needed safety assurances, rigorous screening takes refugees into a perilous waiting
period. The host communities are assumed to have form of social capital in the form of
immigrant networks, housing accommodation and ethnic body that is willing to assimilate.
Nevertheless, secondary migration is an issue to the intended placement schemes for migrants.
That is why quantity and variety of intake is important as well because, if there is no balance
and diversification, one may overload his organism with a substance and tongue it will thicken
and turn over slowly which is not good for people. Small numbers of refugees may be given
inadequate focused service, but large number in specific towns can over locate schools, health
and physical infrastructure. One advantage of resettling in ethnic enclaves is that it taps into
ethnic solidarity, while the reverse – cultural exclusion – may hamper integration. Dispersed
placement leads to early absorption but constant relapse to culture shock with no support system.
Choosing how to solve such dilemmas is still a matter more of feel and still depends on domestic
political factors rather than good sense.
Everyday there are new risks that are constant and thus the selection and placement methods
have to change constantly. Due to regional conflicts and climate change disasters, refuges will
increase so many folds that program implementation will be had across the across the world.
Short-term negative attitude might be the result of hostile nationalism and xenophobia, hence
reducing public welcome of refugees from specific backgrounds. Thus, advances in technology
that enables a quicker and safer return may promote newer and better matching services and
probabilistic models identifying ‘secondary migration streams and integration effectiveness rates.
P a g e | 21
Therefore, to achieve their core humanitarian mission refugee resettlement programs must
continuously improve selection and placement programs so as to meet future needs and trends.
- Criteria for Refugee Selection
The criteria of choosing refugees for resettlement is not easy and is carried out systematically
after passing through a stringent process of listing refugees most deserving to be resettled.
Resettlement is generally thought of for people who are endangered or in peril in their country of
asylum and have no other feasible solution. This can include individuals who suffered from
torture or sexual abuse, or the most vulnerable, legally or physically, and female-headed
households. Besides the protection factors, the resettlement country assesses the refugees’
resettlement and integration prospects after their arrival in this regard, the opportunities for
family reunification, the knowledge of English or the ability to learn it, the level of education or
applicable skills at work.
For instance, the United States aims at refugees with relatives legally residing in the country
because it is argued that they stand high chances of being integrated into the society. Particular
stress is laid to those who have English or those, who can be promoted to the level of English
language acquisition. Another factor considered is the level of education and transferable work
experience that also have positive impact and therefore make a case for integration. The United
States also respects pledges to make referrals on particular categories of refugees listed in
UNHCR normally the minorities or persecution from certain nation. Security clearance is
another important condition and all the refugees’ candidates for US resettlement are carefully
screened.
P a g e | 22
On the other hand, Canada’s private sponsorship allows local organizations and groups of
individuals that total more than 5 people to select potential refugees by themselves albeit under
more enormous self-selection apart from the government directives. Meanwhile, Canada retains
the fundamental conditions of selection for resettlement with reference to risks, protection as
well as integration issues; however, there are improvements in the refugee choices through the
private sponsorship. Most European nations have not only selected their Indices by the usual
integration indices, susceptibilities, and obligatory requirements for protection but also
compatibility indices with help of culture, religion, or values similarity to help integration.
The plurality of criteria for selecting cases is aimed at compliance with the international
commitments concerning the most endangered refugees in terms of long-term solutions while
assessing the prospects of integration; security aspects are increasingly significant over time. It
means that the diversity of the selection frameworks used in different resettlement countries
leads to diversification of the opportunities of resettlement and introduction of the discrimination
factors which have to be monitored. In conclusion, despite the efforts encompassed in the
selection of refugees, there is an attempt to provide more expansive humanitarian aid and, at the
same time, having proper assurance for the refugees that the resettlement will bring sustainable
solutions.
- Priority Groups for Resettlement
If the governments and the resettlement agencies themselves have preferred groups they select
refugees from among those to be resettled. This recognizes that there is a need now and it also
accepts that there are some profiles of refugees that will always be hard to host. Of course,
favoring some refugees over others is generally a contentious issue, but it is justified on a
rational basis.
P a g e | 23
People, such as families/women and children are vulnerable and get attacked. In camps, the
social risk that women, single mother, families without father, children without parents, and
youths face are physical rape and abuse. As long as they are resettled quickly, extending their
rights and protection happens at a faster rate. Old people also to need to be joined by their
families for care which they cannot receive in camps for refugees. As a result, both groups may
be easily integrated into the communities in case they are resettled at a young age.
The vulnerable civilians are the focus of retention and punishment when the offenders’ assault
or torture them. Both rape and other forms of sexual abuse victims require medical attention and
counseling and so do the tortured who require special care which is not easily given in camps.
The presence of these in the resettlement countries improve on the recovery channels.
The asylum seekers who experience health issues that cannot be assessed in the camp are also
addressed. Serious acute and chronic diseases that are complicated and the patient is likely to
deteriorate further need faster resettlement so that the patient can be attended to. Similarly,
disabilities requiring long-term intervention and support are managed in resettled countries with
a stronger health system.
In asylum countries some refugee may be preferred depending on their nationality or ethnicity
if they are discriminated against or don’t have a citizenship. Year after year, racial, religious and
cultural minorities have been barred from local integration hence requiring third country asylum
for protection.
Despite this being pragmatic, the priority deserves to be an acceptance of different views.
Concerning commercial consumer relations, consumers and businesses should have rights and
should be protected to avoid being overcharged and defrauded respectively. Much stricter norms
P a g e | 24
and requirements should be put in practice and followed with the purpose to preserve the
elevated levels of legitimate population. However, those, who haven’t been prioritized, do have
rights and needs as well. It is important not to let the wellbeing of some of the refugees be reset
dismiss other efforts of enhancing the wellbeing of others who stay in the camps. In fact, an
ethical refugee system should be made up of the two options.
All in all, the priority status of refuge means that these people are in danger, they have limited
rights and they have essential needs. This is probably why it is more oriented at equity and rights
rather than nationalism. Yet they are incomplete; one can manipulate them and that does not deal
with the issue of providing shelter for everybody who needs it. At the time when refugee crises
extend for a long period, countries and the third parties involved must seek for cooperation in the
protection of Rights and supplying all the Needs of refugees.
- Placement Strategies: Urban vs. Rural
Among the most contentious topics which any outlined refugee resettlement strategy cannot
avoid, is the issue of destination. One of them is associated with the choice of where the refugees
are relocated to live, namely in urban or rural areas. This can have a significant impact on
integration outcomes because both provide certain opportunities and threats.
Immigrants and refugees living in urban setting interfaces more with the resource such as public
transport, ethnic food stores and places of worship, health facilities, employment opportunity and
other immigrants and refugees for role modeling and assistance. The people help those who
require help to get around day to day, to get a job, to learn English and to just live in this country.
The multiplication of a city offers the subject discretion that might be convenient when
originating from especially marginalized or persecuted communities and combats solitude. Large
P a g e | 25
countries with big cities also possess the ability to accommodate a large number of refugees at a
time. But urban areas are also less accessible with expensive housing, pressure on welfare
services and higher tranche that does not spare the new arrivals enough time to settle. The
conformity and independence pressures are more and the cost of job is more so those refugees
engage in low wage employment and reside in overcrowded houses.
It may assert lower cost of living, increased togetherness and unity in the community, and skill
and language acquisition get done through volunteering to mentor in countryside. It also is rather
normal for refugees to place themselves near their friends or relatives in the town thus forming
conspicuous ethnic and religious clusters. Rural settings also provide more job opportunities in
agriculture, processing and manufacturing industries for instance, extension of meat industries.
However, challenges exist in rural context into which refugees are relocated and these include:
access to resources such as food assistance programs and classes to learn English, access to
health facilities and English Interpreters services. A small and compact group may develop what
is referred to as culture shock while the new comers feel more exposed and isolated in a ‘we
Asians’ society during phases of oriental familiarization. Transportation is also the problem that
has to be solved because transportation is the aspect, which demonstrates the existing
discrimination of disabled people.
However, from the above, one can conclude the experience of integration in both rural and
urban setting can be positive. Some of the characteristic of the refugee group that will influence
the place that is chosen will include language and employment history, number of persons per
family and their health status will be drawn from the ethno-cultural characteristics of the place,
availability of resources etc. It is necessary to find out more about differences of the problems
and opportunities of the two environments, to develop measures for efficient intervention, and
P a g e | 26
provide essential resources, vocational training, social contacts, which should foster successful
resettlement and integration of immigrants.
- Matching Refugees with Host Communities
There is consensus that the process of resettling refugees entails finding appropriate communities
with whom the refugees can live. There are however several factors that one needs to check to
ensure that the resettlement programs so desired can assist the refugees to fit and integrate into
the new pattern of their lives; it therefore means that the officers need to examine several matters
relative to the said refugees and the possible areas of resettlement. In a nutshell, the criteria
include the language the refugees speak, skills, and experience possessed by the refugees, the
health condition of the refugees, the number of people one refugee sponsors the cultural aspects
and many others. These profiles have to be matched with the communities under study in terms
of available suitable housing, schools, health care, jobs, transportation, language, perception
towards immigrant and other related co-ethnics groups, cost of living and services offered by
refugee agencies, ethnic associations, religious institutions and local government. It is in these
that differentiate between the concept of affirmative action and discrimination is made. The issue
of placing large groups of refugees is in the pressure it puts on the local communities, especially
if one places large groups of refugees into economical barren areas with little prospects of
employment or into areas that cannot finance schools and other social services or into areas that
regard this as a threat and thus foment tensions between the refugees and local population.
However, if their linguistic, cultural, employment, health and community needs are unfulfilled
then there may be social exclusion, poverty and, other related factors such as depression due to
complications related to maternity due to inadequate health care services. The legal factors also
come in for the reason that; In some of the states there are legal bounds on the use of services
P a g e | 27
such as Medicaid for the resettled refugees which determines the level of resource allocation to
the refugees in that particular state. Consequently, it must be ambitious matchings, and well-
informed placements to ensure that refugees can smoothly integrates in good communities,
secure an employment, support themselves and, generally, adapt new lives in these new
environments comfortable with their new neighbors. In that context lies the balance on which
resettlement programs can continue to bear humanitarian duties alongside helping towns, cities
and states to deal with the impact on education, health and employment amongst current
beneficiaries as well as primary refugees.
- Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Almost all aspects of refugee resettlement programs are in one way or another facilitated or
engaged by NGOs. Beginning with the identification and relocation of refugees who are merely
fleeing persecution up to the point of follow-up services after the subject gets to the country of
asylum, NGOs become the major supports for governments which may lack the capacity or
knowledge to adequately support the refugee populations.
Due to the fact that they are in direct contact with refugees in their home countries, they also
engage in identifying and recommending well qualified candidates and families to other
countries of asylum. Priority may be given to vulnerable persons in terms of danger, rape and
torture victims, female headed households and those with serious medical ailments. In the
refugee camps and among the urban communities in the world, the staff of the NGO interviews
and evaluates the prospects of the candidates for priority status of resettlement as per the set host
country guidelines. They also prepare case files, recommend refugees for resettlement, and
pursue it with appropriate governmental bodies to accelerate same.
P a g e | 28
Internationally, refugee–serving NGOs provide several reception and placement services when
the refugees arrive. These NGOs include provision of items such as DVD players and small
appliances in the apartment, transport services from the airport, hence, are valuable in aiding first
weeks’ adjustment assisting in such matters as the use of public transport, registration of children
to school, and making an application for social services. Also, they provide the various post
crisis client services such as medical and mental health services, employment services. Because
they know more about refugees’ needs, people who work for NGOs establish the link and solve
problems that would not be solved within bureaucratic organizations.
Despite the massive benefits from these NGO services, they are limited as far as the size of
them and the degree of their intervention is concerned. As the refugee situations escalate in
different parts of the world, NGOs are too often lacking of funds and too few staff to meet the
expanding work demands. They can only maintain a small number of physical sites, mainly in
the large cities; they cannot provide good network coverage to refugees who are scattered across
large provinces in the countries where they have sought asylum. All these challenges
notwithstanding, they do not in any way detract from the fact that refugee resettlement NGOs are
important players who can actually help to build refugees’ stable resettlement and their ability to
rebuild their ordinary existence.
- Challenges in the Selection and Placement Process
Refusal and politics of selecting and placing of the refugees forming different challenges for
agencies as well as the authorities is a broad notion of refugee resettlement. But one is that
during the referral and screening process, not enough information is provided about the
candidates. Most refugees arise from nations that lack infrastructure together with paper work to
establish one’s identity, history and status. The presented challenge is that the agents are required
P a g e | 29
to show kindness to the displaced on the one hand, while at the same time they are also alert to
security risks, health risks, and likely opportunities for assimilation. Due to the high rate of
referral, there are less of resources to undertake the individual assessment. Such a lack began to
affect all spheres of human life, not excluding the consideration of the fact that there is also a
shortage of culturally competent interpreters, so the problem of the consequent communicative
clarity is also here, for instance.
Following selection, the placement of refugees requires knowledge of inequities of and within
the communities they are placed in. Some of the areas which may be considered as unsafe or
those that lack ethnic populations or communities might develop culture shock and related
feelings of isolation. However, the groups of clustering could become a barrier to integration and
social mobility if the linguistic or vocational options are missing nearby. Dispensing the refugee
families, languages, practices, generations, and occupations in sites evenly is rather difficult
because houses are limited. Larger families are basically the most affected by these shortages
because in the event that there is no house that will accommodate the whole family the members
have to split up. Concerning the distribution of the aid funds to multiple sites, burden to agencies
is observed, and at the same time the level of competition rises. Placement calls are also affected
by community receptivity that also has variation, despite the fact that programs do not allow
discrimination. Addressing such dynamics in a more coordinated fashion blurs the edges of most
placement packages and officers’ coping with crises involving mass humanitarian movements.
All these resettlement barriers produce consequences on refugees once they are resettled in the
society. This is because weak screening raises odds of a terrorist to breach the borders while
cultural exclusion reduces motivation to be self-sufficient. Little realize that broken homes
similar to both children and parents’ hindrances to economic productivity. Other poor placements
P a g e | 30
also cause second migration away from the main centers and therefore poor monitoring, which
means that aid is less effective. Nonetheless, there are remedies: from the referral networks and
the procedures of the assessment to the community connection and housing choices. By prior
planning and while using the lens of empathy, difficulties in the placement in certain areas can be
transformed into opportunities for resettlement with the change in the models of service delivery.
But receiving rates and life outcomes are contingent on selection and placement policies as the
first interaction between refugees in the need of shelter and hosts who can offer it. In this case,
however, the differences are well-defined based on architecture, and help to differentiate between
hopelessness of alienation and rediscovery of place.
4. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND EMPLOYMENT
Economic integration and employment are two conditions that could foster or hinder refugee
resettlement programs as the acquisition of a job and financial stability assists in the provision of
personal and family needs and also assists in the integration to the new society. However,
refugees face a lot of difficulties with regard to the integration of the domestic employment
sector including; non recognition of foreign credentials, poor language performance, job
discrimination and lack sufficient bargaining power in employment systems. Some of the
measures identified by the resettlement agencies in regard to promotion of economic integration
are skill building programs, credential assessment, resume writing and apprenticeship and job
search support.
For example, refugee workers in the United States have very high labor market participation,
and are employed in key sectors like the low-tech manufacturing sector including garment
making, in the health services sector as well as transport and meat packing. However,
underemployment, exploitative employment, degradation into low skill jobs are also observed
P a g e | 31
due to displacement trauma and education dislocation and through a refugee lens in devaluation
of human capital. Other programs such as supplementary credentialing or upskilling aids in
dealing with problems of lack of portability of prior learning, education for these for higher posts
as engineers, scientists, academics and so on, while persons with entry levels are equally
important to begin with.
At the community level other organizations support microfinancing services business plan and
business operational skills for the entrepreneurial refugees to exploit on their culture of small
enterprises. Some of the measures of ensuring the refugee’s self-sufficiency include; Refugee
policies that enable them to engage in informal employment opportunities such as street vending,
food catering and ethnic business. However, lack of language preparedness, discrimination and
these licensing procedures remain as a challenge to the new immigrants on how they are to go
about being employer and employee in these new host countries.
The scars of deficiencies of the agencies in preparing these refugees for economic absorption
manifested more than a year after resettlement may be observed by continuing case management
after the first year and assessing the indices systematically and economically. Employment
mentoring for instance, vocation English and micro financing to these needs depending on
refugees’ country of origin, education status, and working experience, might also ease economic
integration in the societies and benefits to the refugees or to the host communities.
- Labor Market Access for Refugees
Employment is an essential factor in economic integration and connection of the resettled
refugees to the labor market. Self-employment enables the refugees to be economically
independent through income generation to support their families, develop human capital, become
P a g e | 32
tax payers, contribute to the productivity of the host country economy as well as integration of
social and cultural fabric of the society. However, refugee face many difficulties when trying to
secure a job and this impacts the refugee resettlement programs in terms of the transition from
the resettlement program to employment.
Among those, lack of credentialization of foreign education and experience, language problems,
employer discrimination, lack of references and interview techniques and employers’
misperception of refugees’ legal status when seeking employment. These problems make
unemployment; studies show that refugees have an employment rate five to ten percent lower
than that of native population. That is why refugee is often weaker and in need of welfare. From
the view of resettlement programs and the policy makers the stated outcomes are perceived as
failure or inability to guarantee positive economic reintegration.
One can speak about education, training, recognition of prior learning, job search assistance
programs, anti-discrimination legislation and bills, raising public and employers’ awareness
about refugees and asylum seekers, early and intensive case management, language tuition and
individual career development according to the assessment of the labor market for each refugee.
If those aspects of integration have been successfully put in place, as it has happened with
Canada, then one observes notably higher employment and an economic reward for investment
without an equivalent draw down on public resources.
While developing possibilities of self-realization and productive activity among refugees
contributes to the diversification of offer in the demand for labor in the host countries’ economies
that corresponds to the values of the goals and objectives of the resettlement programs and their
effective integration into society. They thus turned out to be empowered, skilled and market able
refugees who are able to work within foreseen labor markets when there is no structure hindering
P a g e | 33
their integration and contributing to the social and economic development of respective societies,
they find themselves in.
- Employment Support Programs
ESPs are truly one of the most vital elements in the transition to economic reforms and financial
viability of resettled refugees. In this regard, to enable the refugees to find jobs that match their
level of education, skills, interest and experience, the governments, NGOs and other community-
based organizations have come up with the following interventions. Such approaches are aptitude
tests for eyeing transferable skills; resume and interviewing techniques applicable to the host
country; Building mentor relationships and friendships; workplace training at lower costs for
understanding the environment of that particular country for working; bridging education
programs for familiarizing oneself with certifications recognized in an unfamiliar country;
microenterprises and capital and other provisions and services grants for a new business venture;
and wages subsidies offered to employers to provide employment to those who Vocational
training hence holds an opportunity for the reset leads individuals and households financial
freedom, contributes to the economic resources of hosting communities through availing job
opportunities and opportunities for a receiving nation to seek means of funding the further
resettlement programs in case the refugees acquire employment and pay taxes. Despite such
demands, job-focused integration policies targeting forced migrant populations, whom are often
ranked as the most vulnerable, are still grossly underfunded and grossly lacking in capacity to
meet confirmed need. Similarly, the regulatory barriers embedded in immigration procedures
such as work permit challenges reduce the probability of refugees deploying the existing market
assets immediately, they get to the host country. However, existing research thus suggests that it
allows refugees to avoid the risks associated with the informal employment, to practice language
P a g e | 34
learning, to counter loneliness and other broadly psychological problems characteristic of forced
migrants after their arrival to a new country, to attain a secure initial employment irrespective of
skill match, and to lay the foundations for career advancement in a new country. Therefore,
governments all across the world must increase their expenditure towards designing, delivering
and evaluating community friendly and localized ES services for refugees, not only as a
humanitarian consideration to offer help to the forcibly displaced persons, who happen to be very
eager in the global labor market, possessing dormant skills but also as a sound economic policy.
- Refugee Entrepreneurship and Self-Employment
Nowadays, employment and business by self-employed resetting refugees and refugee business
have been one of the best ways of integrating and being employed in the country. Several studies
have indicated that there are numerous challenges that refugees encounter when they seek
employment in the host country’s economy; these include: Refugee qualifications are often non-
recognized, refugees face employment discriminator, they cannot comprehend the local
language, and does not have connections in the job market. As a result, shy there has been
increased promotion of what is known as the refugee entrepreneurship scheme that comes with
training, coaching, connections and funding for the refugees to start enterprises of their own.
Another cross-sectional survey in 2019 showed that 13. Currently, the refugees’ self-
employment in the United States is at 5%; 7%. Among the immigration population, only 9%
were found to be in high skilled employment category and only 6%. Only 3% of the population
born in the United States indulge in the same. Business ventures carried out by the refugees
provide income and therefore employment to the people of the resettlement areas in the
economy. For instance, in Cleveland, Ohio refugees’ firms directly sell their businesses, and their
overall business and economic significance reached and exceeded 9 million in 2019 and offered
P a g e | 35
more than 2,100 of employment. While operating for both co-ethnic as well as non-co-ethnic
customers, the type of goods and services, or the type of food served by refugee business may be
different.
However, there are many issues in relation to business start-ups, and the problem of
comprehending the legal aspects, lack of financial knowledge and the problem of finding start-up
capital is relevant for refugees. Community-based resettlement Agencies and NGOs are perhaps
more strategic in our offering of culturally and linguistically appropriate training and Mentoring
of the refugees. There are also emphasized for those, that the best practices call for individual
support with focus on business planning, legal registration, micro credit and grants, acquisition,
as well as a sound basic accounting.
Finally, it is important to mention that besides the personal assets, assessing the capability to
overcome the barriers, which can exist in the form of structures and policies to affect the
refugees’ opportunity to access the opportunities necessary for self-employment, is also useful
for evaluating the success of self-employment. Measures directed at sectors containing large
numbers of refugees as well as the ethnic enclave economy are therefore possible. To sum up, the
refugee entrepreneurship and self-employment will be on the steady increase and will receive
even more attention in the future. It also becomes a means of assisting Refugees to achieve better
Economic opportunities in the host countries, enhancing Refugees Human capital, and forging
for more welcoming and prosperous country economies for Refugees and other citizens.
- Economic Contributions of Refugees
The immigrants bear little or no property when they arrive at their host countries; they are forced
to work and seek shelter as soon as possible while they try to contend with a different language
P a g e | 36
and way of life. But researches have however shown that once the refugees are permanently
settled in a given nation or country, they are capable of bearing the economy of such nation or
country provided the necessary instruments are employed. A study that was carried out on
refugees in Cleveland Ohio for Seven years revealed that refugees led to revitalization of
crowded areas, they occupied abandoned houses and also established new business enterprises.
These neighborhoods expanded and become business centers, and in the process property values
surged while individuals who settled in these areas received more service. Besides, contrary to
their complaints of high costs to resettle the refugees in the initial years, the refugees paid more
taxes than the amounts given to them under welfare.
The above similar study on refugees in Europe also revealed that refugees are willing and
qualified workforce. These countries have also had higher rates of entrepreneurship and this gave
rise to employment. Authors pointed out that the refugees in Sweden joined the labor market
very fast, they possessed high degree of occupational specialization and as after 8-10 years of
reception their employment rates dominated the average ones. The study also indicates that, a
refugee, on average, has to stay in Sweden for over 12 years up to 17 years or more before
granted to be a net Tax payer that is the amount of Taxes paid more than the amount of subsidies
received from the Tax base. As such, the authors observed that there is also a potential to enhance
the economic dollars signs by extending funding to increased assimilation efforts such as
language acquisition.
Canada’s government has also traced the economic settlement of refugees over time in relation
to other immigration categories. Only during the first few years of resettlement, refugees are
offered such services as reasonable rental charges and cash income. Another finding done after
10 years showed that refugees can attain the same level with other citizens in as much as
P a g e | 37
employment and repaying taxes to have them offset the expenses incurred. Canada has somehow
come to realize that, yes refugees are a significant segment of workforce who are ready to
undertake duties that ordinary citizens do not have the time for. This means that the refugees
need to be able to combat such initial barriers of integration and may then fill strategic roles
within the economy.
Presenting outcomes of refugee studies, then, provide enhanced early resettlement and support
services to help refugees find work and business opportunities in new host countries, revive
depleted communities, fill shortages of workers in new economies, and generate taxes that
benefit those new host countries. For the support of refugee integration, one gets a motivated and
entrepreneurial population that creates employment and exercises the economic policies. Despite
the fact that resettlement is costly, refugees demonstrate their economic viability within a short
time and are active and productive members of the society as well as the source of skills and
revenue.
- Barriers to Economic Integration
Arguably, one of the most acutes challenges that refugees face during the process of seeking
refuge is the question of to economic mobility and employment. The following are some of the
barriers that prevent refugees from achieving financial security and work: The above is one of
the reasons as most refugees come from countries where the language spoken is not English and
thus, they cannot even read the language. No local language causes a refugee to be unable to
understand the bureaucratic procedures, represent himself or herself, respond to the court or even
get a job. Additionally, there are employment barriers for highly trained and qualified refugee
who struggles to have their training and certificates from their home countries accredited by the
local market. Educated and professionally accredited persons like doctors, engineers, teachers
P a g e | 38
among others give up because their education and accreditation are not honored, hence they
cannot work in their line of expertise. But as the facts show, 90 percent of the refugees are able
to get at best, low-skill employment even if they were well educated in their home country. Other
concerns that are raised include concerns touching on driver’s licenses; due to limited public
transport systems, refugee gets to working stations. To be able to acquire a driver’s license one
must study driving manuals which are written in a technical language not understood everywhere
and pay fees which are beyond the reach of anybody who has no income. Also, prejudice such as
that against refugees or people of color come in the way of moving up the social strata. It is
possible that employers do not want to take a gamble on those who are still considered to be
outcasts and who therefore will not be coming into an organization with their own notions of
organizational cultures. On interpersonally level negative attitudes Shown by long-term resident
may isolate refugees for not to allow them to become integrated into the society. Last but not the
least, refugee is socially isolated in the host society as they are displaced, and separate from their
original families and friends. Having few local professional contacts, they can barely get a hold
of any opportunities that are offered through word of reference. When it comes to getting a start
in career fields, it is better to know the right people than to be well-credentialed in some ways.
Therefore, there are various barriers of integration to the economy by the resettled refugees and
asylum seekers such as language and licensing barriers, prejudice, and social capital. Some of
these challenges can be well addressed by programs that are designed to deliver language and
skills enhancement, credentialing, anti-discrimination and mentoring services. But
transformation of such deep-seated societal and attitudinal shifts is necessary to integrate
refugees into new employment domains and provide them with the bargaining power to deploy
their assets to precipitate economic transitions.
P a g e | 39
- Case Studies of Successful Economic Integration
Analysis presents a number of case studies in order to showcase that refugees are capable of
achieving economic integration and getting a job. In Sweden for instance there have been quite
effective extensive integration policies targeting on early intervention with intensive language
classes and social orientation besides vocational training reflecting refugees’ background. A
sample survey of the refugee groups in Sweden for the period July 1997-June 1999 found that 5-
8 years after arrival, 50-60% were either in a job or in some educational course. This steady
employment pattern is as a result of training of refugees that enabled them toes seek employment
in the Swedish labor market and laid down on the areas of health, education, and technology.
Canada is another example of the positive effects that have come with private sponsorships of
refugees and their consequent economic assimilation with private associations providing money
and care for refugees, things like language acquisition that enable employment. Comparing
privately sponsored refugees to government sponsored refugees to show higher employability
rates of the former at the one- and three-year post arrival point. Looking at the employment rates
after 3 years privately sponsored refugees had more than double the employment rate than H1B
showing the distinction between and integration model that centers around Social
Capital/Mentorship as opposed to the Public/Government financial support.
If one narrows his observation to agriculture, the incubation centers for the refugee farmers
from Africa and southeast Asia have been well integrated economically into the kibbutz
settlements. With these group agricultural trainings, as well as land and water provisions; there
has been an increase in their incomes, Nutrition standards, and food security. These initiatives
went straight to the economic activities aligned towards the experience in farming, which many
refugees possessed on arrival.
P a g e | 40
With regards to the refugee housing policy in Berlin, the density and the heterogeneity with
regard to economic factors enhance the probabilities of income generation in the urban
environment. Due to non-creation of separated, refugee-containing housing zones and the used
strategy that implies distribution of refugees among the initial population of certain districts of
the city, social reintegration has been promoted, so the enhanced legislation of the native
language, employment search networking, and other kinds of sponsorship. Previous studies
disclosed that refugees in Berlin transited to paid jobs or self-employment more quickly into the
German labor market because of this housing policy of economic integration.
In aggregate, we can sketch these successful economic and employment consequences of
integration policy that simultaneously aims to meet the refugees’ previous experience and the
labor market demands, as well as focus on the initial stage of extensive service provision and
socially reintegrate refugees into help densify the search for work’s diversification. This allows
the essential social network on which sustainable resettlement and employment can be premised
to be developed.
5. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION
The pace of which the process of resettlement of refugees has an important aspect-social and
cultural adaptation. For instance, refugees undergo a lot of struggles as they try to become
acclimatized to new societies because they have to learn new cultures, and new systems of values
and beliefs. Thus, integration projects ease this difficult process by providing linguistic and
cultural training, employment, housing, and all other services and prospects as a means for
rendering refugees productive and efficient members of the societies they are accepted into
economically, socially, politically and culturally.
P a g e | 41
Integrative methods are those that prepare refugees to keep such aspects of culture as custom,
art, belief system, and language but at the same time to adopt certain social aspects, including
language, manners, laws, and bureaucracy, and the like, which is something that must be done
cautiously as the balance between these two aspects is easily variable. On one hand, complete
assimilation, that is, distancing oneself from the refugee’s cultural practices would entail that
such a person would experience loneliness and rejection. However, granting refugees a right to
live in ghettos where they are not interacting with the rest of the population, in the long run
cannot be said to be integration and does not allow such interactions that would foster
understanding between different human beings. The best efforts in considering resettlement
policies strive in between – to create multicultural, integrated and accepting societies and afford
refugees as many positive opportunities for socially and economically constructive encounter
and interaction with locals and, at the same time, preserve refugees’ cultural reference points for
navigation, stability and security in a new world.
It is indeed best measured as offering the basic necessities with clients being able to get
language assistance; education/vocational training; housing; and community/cultural orientation
while at the same time enabling interaction, understanding, mutual respect as well as integration
between the clients and other members of the society. Similarly, the policies that comprise;
diversity, migrant- political/civic participation, tackle anti-discrimination, promote inclusive
public institutions and offer positive portrayal of refugees in the media promotes integration
more. That said, many refugee populations to this day may be considered socially marginalized –
showing that the process of lobbying for inclusive integration of refugees and their cultures still
persists. These compound processes of assimilation and multicultural tolerance are therefore very
P a g e | 42
useful in the achievement of humanitarian objectives of resettlement programs as it is through
the integration programs that refugees are successfully resettled.
- Language Acquisition and Education
Education and language learning are two elements that shall also support the acculturation of
refugees that are resettled in the US. Education allows the refugees to be not only language
actors in the economic, political and social dynamics that defines the societies of asylum but also
competent actors. However, there are also severe obstacles on a macro-and a micro-level.
Professionals have various education experiences reflecting years spending on getting university
education; however, other refugees might be having inadequate or interrupted education
requiring remedial education. Furthermore, conflicts or displacement may cause learning
difficulties and particularly the inability to learn a second language which needs special methods
of teaching. From essentially a programmatic point of view education for language training and
the efforts that go in providing education for the resettled refugees require enough funding,
classroom teachers who have adequate cultural sensitivity and teaching certification that would
accept the teaching qualifications earned internationally. Due to insufficient funding, schools
with disadvantaged students and shortened language learning processes which heavily depend on
volunteers are experienced. On the other hand, the programs that address linguistic, academic,
and psychological needs holistically report the integration to be on the rise. For example, those
learners who have initial academic success in their first language will have higher possibilities of
learning second language and education achievement. Supplemental tutoring also assists students
with language delays; or learning that may have been compromised due to external
circumstances like disease. However, cultural beliefs that link cultures, religion or ethnically as
superior and hence they should attend academic oriented classes result to tracking to special or
P a g e | 43
vocational classes. Cultural and economic marginalization envisaged by such structural vices
negate the official rationales of helping uplift people socially and economically when moved to
Humane Resettlement paradigms. Therefore, the community-based advocacy groups strive to
achieve the goal of education through activities such as counseling, tutoring, providing of
scholarships as well as encouraging parental support on the basis of cultural sensitivity. These
kinds of undertakings see culture and language as only the sum total of power.
- Social Services and Support Networks
Shelter, primary health care, mental health care services, as well as other social services are
essential services for refugees’ assimilation. Refers to, resettlement programs always have the
best outcomes in case they are providing extensive, trauma-informed services for the purpose of
independence. However, many refugees remain vulnerable and experience challenges in
accessing and receiving: Receiving services for treatment of their illnesses, finding jobs, learning
English, finding homes with reasonable rents and other services which would enhance their
assimilation into the society.
After the forced displacement from their home countries, and during the resettlement process
refugees go through loss, and trauma, so any intervention by caseworkers that aim at the mental
health and psychosocial well-being of the beneficiaries constitutes a positive contribution to the
integration process. Most refugees’ social capital must be created by providing them with the
connections they need in order to improve their stability and membership in society; this
connection is the link to counselors and support groups. Unfortunately, mental healthcare is still
underdeveloped and on the level of demand worldwide, but emerging organizations try to
compensate for this deficiency with art therapy, mentoring, sports sections, and many more. But
much more investment and capacity development is needed.
P a g e | 44
Likewise, whereas some of the resettlement programs help the refugees to gain early absorption
into the workforce, labor market referencing remains both sporadic, and xenophobic. These
should be facilitated by government and non-governmental organization to ensure that there are
employment opportunities and impart necessary skills to enable people earn an income. Social
support in the form of getting employment mentorship and workplace integration help to the
refugees has been offered by the community sponsorships hence being promising. However,
long-term funding is needed to expand such high-intensive and individualized methods with an
emphasis on patients.
Housing affordability also improves integration success because refugees and their families find
residential homes to be scarce; available stocks create long waiting lists or force the families to
seek temporary accommodation hence increasing on their trauma. Some of the promising
concepts of housing include models that focus on community within a locality. Therefore, it is
clear that interventionist approaches are required across multiple sectors to cover the system-
level deficiencies that prevent refugees from moving from bare survival to full flourishing. In my
opinion, there are no perfect integration models out there but the ones that target the aspirations
of the client in reference to the community, healthcare structure, job and career, housing and
education, and social fabric give the intended consumer the best returns in the long run.
- Cultural Adaptation and Retention
Fresh refugees who are forced to move to other countries are also involved in cultural
socialization and identification. In this regard, refugees are supposed to change to the given
culture of the host communities for them to integrate in the social and economic activities. This
can include learning of the language, speaking, dressing, eating, etc. of the host country, but
refugees also engage in the continuation and indulgence in the original culture in order to keep
P a g e | 45
their identity and togetherness intact. Balancing the amount of change with the preservation of
the culture is a delicate balance with which refugee managers and the assisting organizations
constantly struggle.
Consequently, it is counterproductive to emphasize the process of fast cultural acculturation
with little attentiveness to the culture of origin of refugees in order to attain social integration for
it erases refugees’ vital cultural selves. However, this approach seems to focus on a ‘culturally-
pure’ approach to refugee assimilation without integrating some of the valuable aspects of the
new culture that are important for proper social relations within those societies. Maintaining
these balances therefore requires delicate and context implementing processes that address
refugees’ cultural characteristics and barriers to assimilation. The intention of programs that are
to educate refugees with instruments with which they can deal with cultural differences of the
host countries must not convey an implicit model of the process of assimilation that makes
refugees lose their cultural identities. However, two-way cultural change patterns allow refugees
to retain aspects of their culture which are beneficial to the welfare of the community while at
the same time try to adopt other behaviors and other qualifying measures which will fit them into
economic and civil life without having to change their ethnic background.
The problem of balancing culture adaptation and culture retention is not a simple one. These
cultural changes are, therefore, rather problematic for refugees since they lack elaborate support
networks to enable them to cope with such transformations. This can lead to resocialization
solutions in integration services continuing to enforce different forms of assimilation, which are
unbeneficial for the refugees’ cultural identity and general health. Previous negative attitudes
held by the host community to minorities’ cultural values will compel the refugees to forgo any
cultural practices in a bid to be embraced. Refugee persons depend on cultural roots that vary
P a g e | 46
depending on geographical location, national origin, language, and religion so, while the culture
of resettlement must embrace and foster cultural diversity, it must at the same time enhance
refugees’ wellbeing. The index of integration program success is refugees’ obtaining not only the
tools for their socioeconomic normalization, but also the ability and the right to develop and
implement their cultural identity without coercion.
- Role of Community Organizations
Civil societies are very instrumental in enabling refugees to adapt to the social and cultural need
of societies in the host countries. Local non-governmental organizations or charity organizations
assist the refugees in a number of ways as they struggle to regain their normal lives and be
assimilated into normal society. These organizations serve a purpose for the refugees where
government resettlement agencies cannot, or may not, serve, such as, and may include cultural
orientation classes for refugees, after school programs for refugee kids, etc. because of their
ability to work in the community and understand the struggles and the opportunities refugees
might face in trying to assimilate into the new society in a more culturally and linguistically
sensitive manner.
For instance, ethnic community centers owned by refugees themselves to offer new entrants
social support and help according to language, cultural and migration background. Culture shock
and identity loss is somewhat compensated by the fact that there are native products,
cultural/religious celebrations, and chance to study in the native language. The role of modeling
figures in integration processes is also addressed by pointing out that the integration program
also provides mentoring by the successful refugees to perform such tasks as to help an applicant
look for a job or enroll children into school. These organizations also foster intercultural
communication through the organization of cultural shows, sporting events, cooking events and
P a g e | 47
other events which are open to the public. Such advocacy campaigns also seek to dispel what
they perceive as a misconception of the refugee and to raise awareness amongst the people as to
the benefits of the refugees in contributing to the positive social, cultural and economic worth of
the society.
But the organizations which rely on the private funding might not be prepared for ‘the
convenience’ part since the number of refugees admitted ranges depending on the political
outcomes. Majority are highly reliant on volunteers, and many of the remaining staffs are usually
fatigued from such tiring endeavors that involve closely handling the cases of abused minors.
Thus, it is important that sustained efforts be made to reinforce and expand the organizations’
ability to provide Trauma Informative services as needed. With change to the legal safeguards for
the mentally ill and improvements in mental health care providers, employers, schools and legal
clinics, there can be enhancements in vulnerable resettlement infrastructure in the various
sectors. However, most significantly, the depth of knowing and commitment by community
organizations to infuse the power of refugees is constantly shining the light in the adversity of
refugees’ struggles and pain.
- Addressing Discrimination and Xenophobia
Hate and discrimination are still based on race and can hinder the acculturation and or integration
of refugees to new societies. It is therefore possible to argue that such concerns have to be
directly addressed in the context of resettlement programs in an attempt to promote integration
and social inclusion. To address discrimination awareness campaigns can be conducted, positive
representations of refugees to be made available and promoted, discrimination in service delivery
and workplaces to be stopped and refugees encouraged to interact with other communities.
P a g e | 48
For example, the Employment, Education and Social Supports in Canada, Resettlement
Assistance Program works with the settlement agencies and provides anti-racism and anti-
oppression training to employer, landlords, and service providers. The objective is thus to get rid
of or reduce the chances that warrant restricted access to shelters, jobs, education, and health care
for refugees. In the same manner, the US Department of Health and Human Services has funding
known as ‘cultural competence’ that seeks to improve service delivery for the culturally diverse
refugee populace. By these workshops are employed in improving perception and distancing of
stereotype thinking on different cultural practices.
Organizations of advocacy at the grass root level are also involved in the process. There are
agencies such as the Syrian Vulnerable persons Resettlement Scheme in United Kingdom
encouraging the spread of success stories of refugees and the kind of influence they are having
on the society. They document racists incidences and request governments to improve on hate
crime laws. By using public advertisements, they endorse friendly society via the promotion of
the general principles.
Another promising source of intervention in the fight against xenophobic tendencies can be
mentioned to be interfaith chats through which refugee leaders can meet religious organizations.
Some of the cultural activities include panel discussions, sports competition, and food festivals
are among the methods which students can use to participate in culturally. These will
demonstrate how diversity is strength and brings worth or value to the society. And in the
relatively longer’ term, the interrelatedness inaugurated by these programs alleviates the change
of perception of society.
Dealing with discrimination and xenophobia is crucial in the process of social and cultural
inclusiveness and this can only be dealt with through direct intervention in education and policies
P a g e | 49
through popularizing the campaigns through use of media and through intercultural
communication. Resettlement programs need include and implement planned and coordinated
successful strategies that are backed by local government departments, non-governmental
organizations, and other participants of the community. For a society that will ensure refugees
have equal chances to fully and rightly assimilate to the society, a greater and continuous, hence
sectional effort has to be made to eradicate this prejudice.
- Success Stories in Social Integration
It is a measure of the refugee’s ability to become socially readmitted into the society of the
resettlement country. Rehabilitation is one of the phases of refugee resettlement and may be
described as the process through which the refugee becomes assimilated into society. A few of
these needs however, after many years of proper resettlement policies and programs have
achieved reasonable degrees of integration. For instance, owing to conflict in their home country
LAOS, and depending on church groups and other social bodies the Hmong refugees managed to
set up a viable community in the state of Minnesota having arrived in the late 1970s. The most
often reported types of assistance that the respondents received from the social contacts included
employment, housing, language and cultural support. Refugees from Bosnia that escaped ethnic
cleansing in the 1990s have also enjoyed relative success economically and socially in Saint
Louis, Missouri. If it is necessary to define the conditions which make the process of mobility
possible for the refugees, it is possible to point to the concentration on the spheres of vocational
training and the provision of small business loans. Their resettlement agencies also interact and
create a favorable image of the refugees by advocating for their rights, volunteering,
employment, sponsoring amongst other social reintegration factors such as the Bosnian food and
cultural fairs. Such programs enable the ed to enhance the social relations between the settlers
P a g e | 50
and the other people in the society. Moreover, there is a sizable population from Somali refugees
who fled from their country, Minneapolis because of civil war and armed conflict. Because of
their dismal background and poor economic bearing, no culture and discrimination from the
community, the Somalis refugee were forced to form organizations to support one another. For
instance, community center helps the Somalis youth to attain education and recreational services
as well as leadership posts for the successive generation. They also provide some of the adult
education services such as to drive a car, and English lessons for better preparation for refugees.
All the same, with the present structures as mechanization to the Somalis, some small,
meaningful advancement of Somali refugees’ integration has been acquired through grasping of
collective mobilization and autonomy. Altogether, the proper consideration of the resettlement
programming and various community development processes of the different refugee creating
groups delivered a basic infrastructure where they could start to actively construct social
relations and cultural change, in addition to attaining self-sufficiency as well as meaningful
contribution towards receiving societies’ diversification. All these small victories are a depiction
of several angles of integration.
6. HOUSING AND BASIC NEEDS
Safe and affordable housing and the basic needs being a reality for the refugees who are in the
process of resettlement. That is why the resettlement agencies try to procure the required items
for the newly arrived, because, as a rule, money is scarce. Refugees live in what they can afford,
avail or get from the places they dwell; and these are mostly areas of extreme poverty. Other
barriers that affect the access include discrimination by landlords. Once the food, cloths and
initial body shelter are exhausted refugees cannot afford shelter food, healthcare and other basic
needs.
P a g e | 51
Because of pressure on the available money, the resettlement programs then assist the refugees
find permanent homes; which are fundamental to starting off. Nevertheless, there are barriers
which include; large families, no rental histories/credits, language, and low income which keep
them from being able to get safe and sustainable places to live. Refugees are instead left to locate
even tiny dilapidated houses, whose facilities may not include sources of heating or water supply.
For some, they can only avoid the cycle of the frequent relocation, eviction or even homelessness
with the help of such things as rental or/and utilities assistance.
They also want to enable refugees to access other governmental and community services so
they can get food, medical care, education for their children, and a lift as they look for a job.
However, application processes are cumbersome, services of interpretation are sparingly offered
or not offered at all, and vagueness in navigating complex systems lower usability. Lack of
effective public transport also disqualifies refugees from relevant services. These are minimized
through constant follow-up of cases as well as additional funding is needed to fund deficits in
order to help the refugees establish basics.
Therefore, while the major services that may be offered in the resettlement programs include
basic commodities needs of the refugee in the first instance after arrival the challenge is always
to offer resettlement programs that offer a stable and dignified living standard. Earlier on, the
factors that define refugees’ probabilities in the attainment of basic encompasses cost, language,
transitional resources, and public, social services where basics like shelter, food, health,
transport, and income, are comprised. More funds and long-term measures have to be provided
to the refugees, who are in the process of rebuilding their lives in a new country. That is why
Bulgarian and international resettlement programs when basic supports increase can become
helpful in the process of integration.
P a g e | 52
- Housing Strategies for Resettled Refugees
Food and shelter are arguably the most crucial needs which refugees, who have been resettled in
another country, fail to meet properly and at affordable prices. When they come to the U. S,
refugees, are provided with emergency shelters by the resettlement agency but after few months,
they are forced to find their own homes and are expected to pay rent. Refugees’ income is poor,
employment opportunities are scarce, while rents are high, especially in places where other
demand in the market exists. Some of the solutions have been drafted to address these housing
issues affecting the resettled communities.
One of the strategies is the construction of affordable housing for refugees and immigrants
wherein together with resettlement organizations, housing authorities and private developers will
be involved. For instance, an NGO in City X has purchased an ex-hospital and converted it to the
studio, and one- bedroom accommodation for the refugees arriving in the area; the units are let
based on the refugee low-income floor. Similarly, the authorities of Town Y, using grants,
purchased and refurbished the apartment buildings that are intended only for the resettlement of
refugees for the purpose of housing. To temper the transition, guiding the refugees to a separate
stock of affordable housing with the necessary support services is useful.
However, the home sharing programs that are carried out under the supervision of the
resettlement caseworkers provide the refugees with suitable landlords who have some spare
rooms that they wish to let out or who may offer their homes to the refugees for a while without
any charge. This creates an environment of multiculturalism when refugees are also firmly
placed in housing within their locality at an equal efficiency. Other possible initiatives that may
be included are affordable rent or deposit subsidies in form of micro finance, improving existing
homeownership amongst refugees by provision of information and modification of conventional
P a g e | 53
lending procedures, involvement of landlords to address issues affecting the housing application
of refugees, construction of buildings that comprise of normal market price units and some units
that are affordable to recognized refugees and other qualified groups of low income earners.
Shelter remains another unfinished utensil, so does housing more generally, including
specifically financial and social reintegration difficulties refugees encounter once they are
relocated. Experimentation of new models for implementing refugee shelters and collecting
information concerning the efficiency of the new approaches might be beneficial for the
improvement of the policies. They require decent accommodation that is reasonably priced and
safe on which they can begin a new life in the new countries which they will be called on to
inhabit.
- Challenges in Securing Affordable Housing
This is a very big problem when refugees finally move to their host countries, where they are
unable to find decent and reasonable living standards. On reaching the refugees they are
economically insecure, they don’t have credit status, no job which could enable them cater for
market rent. Research conducted in 2021 revealed that more than 60 % of the recently-resettled
refugees spend over ½ of their monthly income on shelter; leaving them with very little to cater
for other basic necessities such as; food, fares, and health care. Like most refugees, few of them
have any savings; hence getting rental applications, security deposits, and brokers’ fees can be
acute when looking for an apartment. There are also factors that revolve on the competition for
the existing scarce stock of affordable homes, this makes it difficult to get units at relatively low
prices.
P a g e | 54
Differences in language and culture also hinder the proceeding that refugees undergo when
attempting to undertake every procedure in the process of renting a house or being assigned a
public house. Many individuals have no clue about leases, tenant rights and duties, insurance,
and other mostly housing liabilities. At other times, the friendly staff staffing the resettlement
agencies may lack sufficient training, language skills and inter cultural sensitivity in offering
adequate direction. Again, it is important to mention that there can be the attitudes that some of
the landlords can have towards the refugee populations. Both perceived and direct hostility
makes the population unable to obtain affordable and suitable shelter in the country.
Bleeding hearts and administrations have implemented droves of immediate solutions including
emergency accommodation, emergency rental aid, housing vouchers, and homestays. However,
these temporary solutions are not capable of solving the problem of scarcity of cheap houses that
can be let out to refugees in future. Various factors like scarcity of rental houses and high rental
charges, replacement of cheap buildings with luxurious ones and others make the refugees to be
located far from near bus/stations, schools, workplace and other basic facilities. More general
than the site-specific solution, but larger-scale approaches to the supply of new constructions and
increased refugee access are needed through building promotions, inclusionary zoning, landlord-
centered programs and CLTs in order to help refugees gain an entrance through affordable
housing.
- Access to Healthcare and Social Services
Another essential need that is usually complicated with the refugee who has been relocated to
another country is the need for shelter or a home. But these have been indices of shelter only and
do not guarantee integration success or even basic needs. Equally significant is health care and
other human services to which any community or its vulnerable members should be entitled.
P a g e | 55
Refugees on arrival have physical and mental health complications occasioned by violence and
inadequate primary needs. All necessitate having to take medication on a daily basis and may
require counseling and other psychosocial care to assist them with issues to do with abuse as well
as recovery. It is also challenging to negotiate for worth it in health systems that are in other local
language as translated to English. It means that the agencies that resettle the refugees should
ensure that the refugees sign up for health insurance as soon as possible and provide for doctors
of the refugees’ culture. Lack of access to transportation can also limit the quantity and quality of
health services adding that refugees are sheltered according to proximity to public transport. This
in turn means that besides treatment services, refugees need details on Health promotion and
Health management in new settings. The heads of families can be consulted from community
health workers some of whom are themselves refugees.
Likewise, as for needs concerning the area of habitation, to gain income maintenance and
employment facilities are equally classified under the domain of health care. They may be in the
eligible list for the available social safety net services but requires someone to help him/her with
the required forms. In the case of claiming for one’s rights with the help of the Act, the staff
working in the institutions of resettlement camps should help in filling of the forms and act in
support of the individual applying for his/her rights. In addition, jobs that are reasonably paid as
well as job availability is an essential factor in maintaining a stable housing market. Hence,
programs such as skills training, help in procurement of employment credentials, help in job
search and acclimatize to the cultural workplaces are highly useful. They may set the level of
autonomy and the prospects of exclusion.
Of course, being housed particularly safe and affordable might be ones first need but health and
income related social service are core to the very definition of services required by refugees. This
P a g e | 56
means that to get right resettlement programming done there is need to look beyond matters of
emergency and transitional shelter and begin talking about issues to do with treatment, social
support, money and employment. These steps can also increase individual and community well-
being where integration has already occurred as well as the stability and longevity of
integration’s presence.
- Food Security and Nutrition
It is shameful that when refugees have to move to other cities in search of a new beginning, they
have to struggle to feed themselves nutritiously in their new cities. These difficulties are
compounded by the absence of shelter or housing insecurity, because people who cannot
successfully integrate or establish stable connections within the communities in which they are
living do not have access to storage, preparation, or consumption that is likewise stable. Such
basic necessities as food and shelter and other requirements are said to be well met if the
refugees are well resettled.
Still, there still numerous impediments to food access and its supply once people reach refugee
destinations. These are lack of finances to get the food nutrient, lack of language in
understanding the foodstuffs, lack of transport to get a hold of the foods and lack of information
on what is available in their food-vendor within the given locality. There are structure failures
that render refugees when putting up their basic needs on their own, Food aid organizations help
to address basic needs but are inadequate in addressing structural voids. Food insecurity is
aggravated if refugees are housed in insecure, poor quality and crowded accommodation because
they may not be able to afford income, kitchen, cool or storage fully to properly preserve the
perishable food. Order and stability in residential and tenancy, as well as in ethnic communities’
social relations provide the enabling conditions to food shopping.
P a g e | 57
The last reason why culturally appropriate food is very essential to refugees is the identity and
social aspect of food. Nevertheless, specialty ingredients can be costly, and some refugees have
to modify the mainstream diet as much as the obtainable products. It can prove cumbersome in
ensuring that the individuals get the necessary and required nutrients in their diet, especially the
elderly and the children in the refugees. But it should be strongly mentioned that there is a
requirement for quantity combined with quality and culture-sensitive products. The helps are
such as partnership with ethnic groceries and gardens; however, general poverty reduction
measures to enable the refugee access culturally appropriate and adequate and nutritious foods in
the market.
The food security mainly defines the probability of establishing stability and security in other
aspects of life of refugees. If refugee families are in a position where they do not get regular
and/or adequate supplies of affordable, healthy and culturally appropriate foods then this
represents a significant threat to their and their children’s health and wellbeing and in terms of
social inclusion and their learning. While the initial and primary need of a refugee may be to fill
the stomach, refugee resettlement needs to happen through policy and community measures that
address and systematically eradicate structural vulnerabilities which lead to food insecurity and
other determinants of life including shelter, health, schooling and work. Development if food
security, as well as the right foods, are attained, refugees can successfully build satisfactory
existence in new places.
- Role of Government and NGOs in Service Provision
The shelters and basic needs that refugees require when they are relocated to another place and
whether it is provided by the government the non-governmental organizations. It is funded
mainly by the federal and local government to procure adequate shelter for refugees once they
P a g e | 58
get to the resettlement area. Some of the particular tasks of the federal government are to supply
grants for the refugee’s cash assistance as well as for the health care, fund the case management
services, cooperate with other organizations to perform the refugee resettlement functions and
pay the refugees’ rent for certain time after their arrival to the United States. Collaboration
between the tiers of government is one of the approaches of maintaining the continuity of the
services.
Similarly, culturally and linguistically competent specialist NGOs concern with fundamental
refugees’ needs for food, clothing, shelter, and work, as well as health services, education, and
social integration and harmony. NGOS that may be formed and accredited by the refugees
themselves may assist in bridging culture gap that maybe existing between the refugees and the
government. They also serve as monitors to ensure that the governments service delivery does
protect humanitarianism. Since most direct services for families who are refugees are provided
by NGOs, including case managers and counselors are involved, NGOs are the bridge that
enables refugees to gain access to medical and other essential needs, English classes, housing,
banking, and school enrollment of young children.
Before, during and after refugees’ resettlement, both governmental and non-governmental
agencies aim at making the target groups as economically independent in the host societies as
they can be soon as possible. But their needs for services and social assistance do not end after a
certain period of resettlement; they are covered with the help of governments. That is why the
official government refugee agencies and a number of NGOs need to sustain their proper
cooperation in order to provide refugees with the extra needful supply and cultural adjustment,
interpretation, employment services and other types of the positive social contacts. For the kind
of work that NGOs do, it is wise to have funding by government, or private sector in the long run
P a g e | 59
as a way of facilitating and ensuring refugees are accommodated in a proper and considerate
manner.
- Best Practices in Meeting Basic Needs
Housing in the case of Refugees becomes very important that the people are protected from the
vagaries of the weather and other hardships of life when they arrive in their new countries. Of all
the human needs, the provision of shelter, particularly acquiring viable, adequate and secure
houses is still a major source of contestation. Some of the best practices that have been known
and implemented by the resettlement agencies include the following in order to meet this
important need. The first one of them is the temporary housing accommodation arrangement that
aims to provide premises for Refugees for 90 to 180 days where they will seek living
accommodation. If a refugee is to find a new country and housing accommodation, then being
able to do it with some measure of stability in interim accommodation reduces the pressure. The
better transitional facilities offer some areas that are private for the families in addition to the
space that is shared, as well as caseworker offices that help with paper work, transportation and
the search for housing. Besides the shelter refugees need simple furniture, food, clothes and
sanitary products, health facilities and other necessities once they have arrived. Often
resettlement agencies store furnishings in stores selling household goods or collect items for
charitable donation to make sure that refugees do not have to pay for base home necessities on
arrival. They also offer food cheques or cash pocket money for first meals while refugees are still
organizing for earning employment. Resettlement staff help refugees and other entrants in
enrolling with programs such as Medicaid, SNAP/food stamp, and cash for provisions.
Healthcare orientations introduce them to the healthcare system and takes them for appointments
in order to ascertain their requirements. Follow up after the settlement also assists the refugees to
P a g e | 60
learn how they can be able to get the provisions after the initial resettlement period. Always
supplying refugees with necessities along with risk mitigation in first months builds that vital
stability. Offered in a right mix and manner, these services help refugees to attain the requisite
basic stability of housing, furniture, health and interim cash that makes them right footing
towards attaining a permanent status in those communities. The strategic best practices
mentioned above assist resettlement agencies to guarantee that refugees leave with adequate
equipment for the new life.
7. EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Education and vocational training are core activities of refugee resettlement programs. Allowing
the refugees to be educated by allowing schools to admit them, allowing them to gain more
knowledge that will make them marketable and useful citizens wherever they are to live.
However, there are challenges that have been associated to refugee education and skills training
interventions. This is the case since disruption of education by war, persecution and or
displacement forces children and youths to miss few years or even years of school. Some of
these people may get certified or possess certain special skills that may not be requiring in the
countries in which they are relocated to. Further, they get locked in by language and due to the
same, lack of finances or other family responsibilities, get inadequate education.
The resettlement agencies endeavor to avoid surmounting these difficulties through
comprehensible as well as vocationally adequate education. Among the services offered are after
school remedial classes for children, adult English for speakers of other languages and bridging
programs were intended to close the learning gaps in refugees. They also coordinate training
programs with local community colleges, technical colleges and employers to establish
accelerated skill acquisition training for career starter programs in areas such as health services,
P a g e | 61
information technology, and production. Such programs enhance the refugees’ linguistic skills at
the same time as they offer them skills that are marketable in the host country. Childcare,
transportation and client-specific flexible working arrangements are among the few illustrations
of wraparound services facilitating engagement by refugees. Assessment and verification of
foreign credentials, degrees and work experience aimed at placing qualified refugees in the right
place in the labor market is also done.
However, difficulties in financial resources available with funding agents reduce education and
skills training mostly to the initial phase of resettlement only. Regrettably, programs are rarely
conceived as continuous, cutting across the entire cycle of integrating refugees. However, as has
been noted, it is a time-consuming affair to acquire host-country credentials and skills and
interruption in education due to lack of funds or poor service delivery hampers integration. The
authorities should increase the number of contracts between the public and private sectors and
the governmental financing of long-term training programs. In general, it is vital to ensure that
refugees get steady employment opportunities with potential for developing locally desired
competencies as well as getting better certification in order to become useful citizens and also
contribute the economy or the respective nations they have fled to. Sweet, durable humanitarian-
based education & skills development, should to persist as a component of refugee resettlement
to have a positive impact on the refugees, and the host societies.
- Access to Primary and Secondary Education
Primary and secondary education becomes a challenge to the refugees who are resettled in new
host countries. The conflict or displacement in the home country has therefore left most refugees
out of school for as long as several months or even years. Refugee students thus perform worse
in their studies as compared to native students this implies that they are below grade level. Some
P a g e | 62
of the difficulties are as follow: Communication of directions is normally given in the language
of the country of host or origin of the tour. The refugees’ families, in any case, always have
financial problems which will make them unable to support their children and make sure that
they go to school or sometimes they do not understand how the system works. Other factors that
contribute to school absenteeism and non-participation include, issues of transport and
discrimination of learner who are refugees.
Recommendations of integration programs of refugees include education of the affected kids in
the early period of arrival in the resettling country with native kids. They make the extra
language classes available to the students and individual and group tutorials to assist the refugee
students to attain the expected academic standards. Cultural orientation for refugee parents
educates the refugee parents about the system of education in the host country as well as the
formal and informal care and support systems so that they can fight for the education rights of
their children. Alternatively, such an association with the resettlement agencies, schools, and
other volunteers in the society is very helpful in making sure that the refugee students get the
added attention that they require. Schooling for refugee children in the crucial period of their
integration offers a grounding and the tools for learning they are likely to need in following
years.
The proponents have supported that education has the following advantages to the refugees in
the long run for the learners and the country of asylum. Thus, as much as refugees who attend
quality primary and secondary classes will be ready to do tertiary studies or technical training.
Consequently, the education and credentialing enable the refugees to get employed in the host
country more easily and are thereby set on the path to wealth creation for the purpose of
stimulating the growth of the economy. It can also increase refugees’ earnings thus making them
P a g e | 63
more able to fend for themselves and thereby become less of a burden to government. Education
also helps the refugees in the process of social and cultural integration as they meet other
teachers and students. It is thus far better to invest in education right from the early phases of the
resettlement process in order to better the lot of refugees and the social cohesiveness of the
societies receiving them.
- Vocational Training and Skill Development Programs
Education and training in vocation should also be fully incorporated into the refugee’s
reintegration and their ability to become independent in the destination countries. However, lack
of language, inability to read and write, financial problems, and lack of information regarding
employment prevent them. Refugee-serving organizations are gradually creating several trade
training programs that could enable refugees acquire trade skills that would fit the local
employment sector. For instance, the African Community Center in the United States educates
people on heath, construction and career in the technology fields. This assists the refugees to
seek for employment within the aforementioned most growing sectors. Similarly, through a
childcare certification initiative, it assists the Refugee Women’s Alliance to prepare refugee
women for childcare employee status. The assessment of such skill development programs
shows what has been achieved, and what has not been achieved to the desired optimum.
Refugees receiving licensure and entry-level jobs, finding their own means of financial support
and establishing relationships with people in the area are among them. However, the ability of
non-profit organizations to obtain funding for such programs independently poses a problem in a
similar manner; modifications of policy regarding refugees also pose a threat to the sustainability
of such programming, research has shown that such efforts have improved employability of
refugees; however, there is scope to do more to address other issues including the employer’s
P a g e | 64
prejudice towards international education and work experience. Thus, the findings of the
literature have shown that what and how refuges get access to and can benefit from skill training
programs; and how these programs connect to good jobs, determine the success of resettlement
programs. Thus, it would be salutary to indicate a substantially more systematic approach to both
public and private areas with the view of improving the skills required for independent living.
There is therefore the need for increased collaboration between the resettlement agencies and the
adult learning institutions, employers, and policymakers to ensure that skilled-refugees are
effectively mainstreamed into various workforce development initiatives through the provision
of vocational trainings, career coaching, employment referrals, renewal of licenses, workplace
trainings among others. Thus, such investments into the refugees’ socioeconomic enablement by
offering them employment chances remain useful for keeping humanitarianism in the programs
that give out resettlement to the recipients while catering for their self-sufficiency.
- Higher Education Opportunities for Refugees
Reasons such as lack of opportunities, legal constraints and limitations, refugees have almost no
shot at continue their education especially for higher education and this is a very social economic
factor on the refugee’s ability to be absorbed in the new country they find themselves
in. However, the research carried out revealed that once the refugees attain quality higher
education, they get better employment and integration. For example, a cross-sectional survey
carried out in 2019 disclosed that the employment rate of college-educated refugees was 20
percent higher than that of refugees educated only up to high school level. Also, through
education, refugees promote positive intergenerational mobility whereby the standard of
education rises in the future generations as well.
P a g e | 65
However, there are some of the challenges that hinder refugees from going to the university as
follows. The first one is lack of finance since the tuition fee may costs a lot of money to poor
students from the poor background families. The refugees may also have discontinuity in their
education due to time taken in transit or in temporary camps before being taken to the country of
asylum. Further, there are also difficulties in cases when one has to register for classes, and apply
for the financial aid in another country. These processes are not easy to explain to the refugees
and more so they do not have social networks to assist them in the learning process.
It is attained by way of resettlement agencies and higher education institutions through
programming. They include: Oh Heya which raised money for refugee students’ scholarships and
enhances funding, tutorial classes in study and testing for college-preparatory courses, Refugee
student mentoring to get academic and career advice, and chances for university and community
organizations to raise the probability for enrollment. For instance, [particular program that assists
refugees enroll into a local community college. But in order to ensure certain success and
enhance the effectiveness of such programs one has to raise sufficient fund and the support of
community.
Education in general, or more specifically, access to quality higher education can be considered
as a resource that can assist refugees to have a successful resettlement and that can enable them
to realize their full potential in the new countries. We offer in this paper the arguments for
financing refugees for higher education in receiving countries on the grounds that they have the
obligation and that it is in their interest create a skilled society.
P a g e | 66
- Addressing Educational Gaps and Language Barriers
Forced migrants can arrive at their resettlement countries with significant learning losses in
education because they have been unable to attend school or have had to study under difficult
circumstances in their homelands or in refugee camps. Many also has language barriers if the
language in which the school operates is not his/her mother language. It was evident therefore
that school systems and resettlement agencies have to search for ways of ascertaining student’s
proficiency and learning loss in a bid to place refugee learners in the right class levels and
categories. Additional classes, learning recovery, learning Recovery Programs, web-based
tutorials and learning support programs can help older refugee students who may be lagging
behind in their learning. Younger students, may be able to tolerate such changes through highly
participative classroom environment. Another strength is non-native speaking students are able to
learn through bilingual teacher’s aides and through teaching aids, basic texts and English
language development classes. Schools should also avoid having extra arrangements or rooms
for refugee kids and only for acquiring language, for this will further segregate them. The
refugee students are offered company through peer buddy organizations in which they are
grouped with other students who are fluent in English. Diversity of the staff and cultural
awareness training being a continuous process enables the teachers to endeavor to understand
and respect what the refugee learners have been through in the previous academic experiences. It
is any parents wish that refugee families become active within the school culture and governance
so that they can effectively advocate for the right education for their children. The monitoring of
refugee’s students’ performance in school, graduation rates and post-secondary education is
essential in case accountability is to be asserted, also it helps in pin pointing out areas that needs
more focused to ensure the much-needed academic achievement as required particularly in the
long term for integration into society. In a collaborative multicycle effort at all levels of
P a g e | 67
organizational administration and cooperation among resettlement agencies, adult learning
centers, public school systems and governments, ministries of education and post-secondary
institutions these challenges can be transformed into opportunities for learning and language
acquisition for refugee children and youth.
- Role of Education in Long-Term Integration
Education has an important function in promoting integration in the long–term sense when it
comes to refugees as it contains a number of features that that can greatly assist refugees,
particularly children and youths: improve their living situation in the host community, learn a
new language and traditions, continue learning at school and for the future to make a living
without having to rely on assistance from others. Of cause, refugees continue experiencing social
problems which include discrimination at school, problem of money, languages difficulties or no
education, difficulties in getting a professional certification from their country recognized in the
new country they reside. Indeed, rate of success concerning the attainment of these barriers is
important.
It is the preparation stage that creates the foundation on which learning will occur in the latter
years of a child’s schooling. Early childhood learning sites for refugee children who have been
detained, witness to traumatic events and may not have been not to school may need to provide
structure for their socio-emotional, intellectual and motor development. It is the role of the
primary and secondary school to build the literacy, numeracy and subject content as well as the
cultural practice of the society. Schools also provide the student with psychosocial services that
assist the student in managing change and acclimatization in the new culture. Making sure that
children enrollment and attendance is significant is because education has multi-dimensional
implication in the future.
P a g e | 68
Acquisition of ‘employed skills’ and economic absorption which is achievable through post-
secondary education and vocational training thus highlights integration marks. At the tertiary
level however the level of participation by refugees is low in the world. Scholarships,
reachability and, therefore, ‘duration’ of a program consistent with the refugees’ citizenship
scenario and credit accumulation in admission and accreditation is conducive to access and
achievement. Work rights should also extend to refugees with study visas so as to also gain
regional experience and also self-finance. This kind of knowledge can be gained only in the
course of discussion with employers when specifying training programs.
Refugees need long term, integrated and individualized education from pre-kindergarten to the
working stage. To realize this vision, it will therefore require cooperation of government
departments, the community and the refugees. There is the need to avoid duplication of services
and development of separate data program, and on the other hand, always refining the programs
using the outcomes data, and taking the stakeholders’ feedback. Education helps in acting as a
link to integration. That ladder, however, must be constructed step by step by means of the
coherent evidence-based policies and comprehensively dovetailed programs that should be
scaled up. The kind of returns that are realized from such investments make the risks worth
taking. The idea of offering relevant, timely and effective education to refugees is to help them
get the tools and capacity in order to integrate, participate, enter the economic activity, and
socially rebuild their lives gradually and progressively within the host societies.
- Case Studies on Educational Successes
This is relatively true, given the fact that promotion of refugee education appears to have
displayed some measure of success all over the world depending on the program that is being
spearheaded. An example is the Refugee Education Center in Cairo, Egypt which has since 2008
P a g e | 69
provided non-formal learning to refugees from Sudan, for instance, and formal learning to
refugees from Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia and South Sudan. It has especially concerned itself with
the welfare of women and children, and as a result over 3000 refugee students have been
enrolled in primary, secondary and post-secondary institutions. Courses have gone on in
students’ L1, while working circumstances have been dealt with; counseling services are
available; partnership with organizations like UNHCR among them, have focused on
examinations and training of teachers. There are positive consequences such as increasing
motivation, and engagement of the students as well as the improved comprehensive meaning,
expectation and psychological wellbeing.
Likewise, the Refugee Action Support program in Auckland New Zealand for instance has
revealed increased high school completion, among refugee from 12% to over 80% since the
inception of the program in 2015. These are homework support after school, parental
involvement programs and focused interventions which have been useful in the realization of
learning objectives. Others have proceeded to vocational training, universities and full-time
employment; with an upstream strategy of independence. Similar combination of focal but
inclusive approaches of intervention have been undertakes in other community also.
Schooling is one of the factors that enhance the integration of refugees alongside improvement
of their overall capability. From the above examples, it can be seen that the use of programs that
are sensitive to the community and alternative models of student support can improved the lives
in students significantly. While change on a larger scale involving systemic and policy levels
involving major transformations is called for, such small-scale shifts are moreover valuable for
showing what different levels of support for educating refugees look like that could be replicated
in other locations globally. Therefore, it is unimaginable to undermine the social and economic
P a g e | 70
value of education to the refugee population and hence the need to step up investment and policy
backing to refugee education.
8. MENTAL HEALTH AND TRAUMA SUPPORT
Assessment of mental health and trauma is the other main concern in refugee resettlement
programs but has the vital duty of foreshadowing programs’ future performances. Many refugees
have been exposed to harrowing experiences including torture, exploitation and loss in their
countries and in transit therefore they have high prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder,
anxiety and depression. Huge barriers exist the same as in other Middle Eastern countries:
mental health care is still not widely accepted, what with the language barriers and unfamiliarity
with the western systems of healthcare. Resettlement therefore needs to have programs that
enrich people’s mental health, and has to include trauma services.
One of the first should involve trauma-informed mental health screening during the process of
resettlement in order to determine needed services. Refugees can go for screening to be checked
and do not have wait until something is wrong to go see a counselor, or they can make
appointments from the resettlement agencies. One of the fundamental ways of creating trust is by
either coming from the refugees’ culture or being able to speak their language. But the research
shows that interpretation services are still necessary even when the counselor is western trained.
Confidentiality also serves as a basis of increasing the uptake of mental health services among
individuals. Media or social policy, home visits or workshops for raising awareness and fighting
the stigma are one of the approaches to the prevention. Such destigmatization efforts convey how
much courage it sometimes requires to reach out and to mend oneself rather than to give in to
frailty.
P a g e | 71
Efficient services also address relations between trauma, conditions at the present, and mental
health. Right treatment of trauma enables the refugees to transform the occurrence in a positive
manner other than denying it since they cannot fit into society. Refugees are free to dissolve
loneliness and engage with other people who are compelled to experience similar problems.
Other elements of the holistic care that is offered by Integrative care; which meets refugees’
multiple needs are; employment support services, ESL and other community orientation among
others. In this type of approach, all the elements of the model are integrated holistically with a
view of promoting recovery and increased levels of independence at the same time.
Although the funding is needed to ensure that quality mental health is offered to the refugees,
the option lowers the overall costs since those refugees achieve successful resettlement.
Refugees work to reduce their reliance on the aid programs that are provided to them, and thus
make good and productive citizens in the society. The studies emphasizing the results of refugees
point out that, if the initial evaluation is trauma-sensitive, then subsequent employment, income
and language skills and enrolment in education and social activities before are anticipated. In this
way such an approach of support allows refugees transform past suffering into drive for positive
change for not only the personal selves but also societies. Hence, while substantial money is
invested in addressing care for mental health and trauma as well as in engaging with the diverse
and multifaceted subject of refugees that is refugees, to construct the basis upon which refugees
can emerge with positive and fruitful lives and to reframe the parameters of achievement of
resettlement programs, it is here that the foundation must be laid.
- Psychological Impact of Displacement
As much as one may want to think that forced displacement does not possess severe psycho-
social effects, this is not the case. Losing one’s home, community and personal property; nay, the
P a g e | 72
loss of a secure place to live is not without a great cost on the psychology of the survivor.
Displacement erases the refugees’ identity, perceived control over their existence and purpose in
life, seeing violence with one’s own eyes or becoming a target of acts of violence, dying or
burying those dear to you, crossing deadly borders or having to spend time in refugee camps. As
such, refugees are admitted to have a loss, mood and anxiety disorders, depressive and panic
conditions, sleep disorders, somatization, and PTSD. Children could also be affected in this to
the extent they develop signs of emotional upset, withdrawal, or inability to concentrate, all of
which are not good for learning.
From the observations above, it becomes necessary to ensure that resettling refugees avail the
right mental health care. The lack of successful management when it comes to trauma becomes a
barrier that complicates the refugees’ ability to adapt to new cultural practices, retrieve services,
find employment, build social circles and assimilate. Psychotherapy helps the refugees in
overcoming PTSD, reconstruct their self-identity, in stress and stable living
management allowing the refugees to feel that they are part of something, to fight isolation and
to discover that they are not the only ones going through a hardship. However, there exist
obstacles to seeking the mental health services among refugees such as stigma, self-costs,
transportation, language and climatic incompetence services. Thus, resettlement agencies have to
advocate for refugees’ access to the specialized service providers who can cater to details of
trauma caused by war. The friends and neighbors’ needs can also be met by training leaders from
the refugee community to offer counseling. Last of all, mental health problems need to be
identified and treated as part of a full spectrum of refugee care along with the medical, legal
assistance, housing and employment problems among refugees. Counseling is therefore one of
the parameters that facilitate refugee healing and their absorption into the host country.
P a g e | 73
- Access to Mental Health Services
It is therefore desirable when arriving in new host communities; to factor in success and failure
and how the refugees’ basic needs and other services that result in positive mental health can be
met. A shift in refugees’ psychological health status characterized by higher rates of
traumatization, PTSD, anxiety, and depression as a result of warfare, oppression, displacement,
housing loss, and social support, and integration difficulties were established in the course of the
study. Counselling is vital in processing trauma and managing change in the self and socially, but
both are scarce in Canada. Some of these barriers are for example; Limited interpretation and
translation services in health service delivery, limited number of service providers with
multicultural competency, lack or limited health insurance, unfavorable attitude towards mental
health services, limited knowledge on the existing services that are available, Transport issues
and previous experience that have made these individuals to lose confidence in the health
system. The resettlement agencies try to make the refugees be put in the free and inexpensive
community care; but there is a severe shortage of such care. Moreover, some of the western ways
of seeking for mental treatment might not suit or might be regarded as wrong therefore some of
the refugees do not get professional help from a health care practitioner but from the community
and the spiritual leaders. All of these factors contribute to a very low level of mental health
service use among refugees as compared to the rates that are required.
Refugees’ mental health could be further addressed through hiring caseworkers and therapists
of refugees’ origin, enforcing culturally competent practice with refugees, availability of
interpreter, transportation for refugees, provision of mental health services to refugees in
community practice, involvement of refugees’ leaders and community members for the mental
health of refugees and trying to secure more fund to provide low-cost services meeting refugees’
P a g e | 74
mental health needs. Avenues through which mental health care could also be made available
may also include partnering with other refugee-friendly NGOs, Churches, etc., possibly offering
sensitive cultural, physical, and complete psychosocial support. Education, Consultation, skills
development, cultural and natural remedies, hobbies and arts need to be incorporated with
clinical treatment for improving refugee’s mental health and integration. Another related study
that can be of interest is identifying the best practices while working with the refugees/culturally
and linguistically appropriate and effective ways of treating traumatic experiences of refugees.
More financial and institutional support for the agencies will therefore mean that the refugees
will have timely as well as right access to mental health care that can promote healing capacity
building and successful resettlement despite having been exposed to past and present traumas.
- Trauma-Informed Care for Refugees
These fears may be as a result of conflict, persecution and/ or journey while in transit for
refugees and Asylum seekers. Thus, the notion of ‘trauma-informed care’ is to become integrated
into the programs for the subsequent resettlement of refugees in order to render the required
assistance in their recovery and integration. In most cases, mental health is seriously impacted on
due to trauma and this is why good trauma care enables a refugee to deal with the experiences, in
order to heal. However, ensuring that refugees receive adequate trauma treatment assumes that
clinicians have an understanding of refugees’ experiential of trauma and cultural knowledge and
skills. They establish that the usual ways of therapy delivery of the Western civilization do not
correspond to the refugees’ experience. Thus, the services offered by the resettlement agencies
require channeling and reorganization in accordance with minimum configuration that introduces
the refugees into consideration while focusing on their welfare and healing. Tenets of trauma
sensitive refugee care involve: the provision of autonomy, formation of a professional
P a g e | 75
partnership along with trust, encouragement of using help from the peers with teamwork, the role
of the family and community recognition, concentration on the potential of the refugees,
awareness of the diversities of the refugees’ culture. Integrated refers to the fact that care
provided should be an all-round care embracing psychological, social, physical, spiritual and
cultural aspects of health. There is common knowledge that group interventions lead to relations
that are essential for creating a therapeutic atmosphere. Through Creative Arts Therapies, the
clients are able to narrate their experiences without potentially saying the trauma happened. This
is because the cultural belief and practices of the staff are the same as the patients and therefore,
the patients are easily able to build rapport and therefore freely embrace and discuss issues which
are culturally sensitive such as mental illnesses. Cultural adaptations can enhance results
including: as preparing to conduct a psychotherapy session in a way that resembles a house visit
with tea, incorporating cultural modalities in treatment, or using structure in a way indicative of
the refugees’ homeland. Individual, multi-disciplinary, trauma-informed and trauma-sensitive
care means that refugees might find validation after loss, rediscover strengths, and restore
fractured relationships in their pursuit to address trauma’s impact and learn about distress
management, new social support, safety and the skills needed to become survivors in the new
world, but wards of healing and hope. The need to build capacity and the ability to engage with
clients who are marked by complex trauma when it comes to displaced people’s goal of
empowering them and their populations of origin to the process of integration cannot be
overemphasized.
- Role of Cultural Beliefs in Mental Health
Culture of the clients plays a major role in their understanding of mental health issues, trauma,
and possibility of healing. Supernatural beliefs as well as beliefs regarding incidences, family,
P a g e | 76
gender, stress management and community responsibilities defines refugees’ experiences and
suitability of measures. Therefore, the cultural part has to be considered in the course of
formulating a resettlement program to meet the mental health of the refugees.
For example, some cultures would like to think that mental disorders are as a result of spirits or
sin. Asking for help from a psychiatrist can be regarded as improper, or even as unbeneficial.
Also, cultural beliefs regarding family honor and privacy do not allow discussions of the trauma
or seek help particularly where the trauma is Gender Based Violence. Sex roles are also adopted
in the acknowledgment of the manifestation of PTSD, how males and females accept or reject
the real manifestation. Also here, not crying and other more expressive forms of grieving which
are specific to a certain culture are examples of culturally influenced somatization.
Besides, refugees’ conventional ways of handling the self with the use of prayers, rituals, and
herbs do not conform to the contemporary models of counseling and prescription of medicines
that affect the chemicals in the brain. Other features of culture that might be relevant for care
might also resist individualistic treatments. Also, language and cultural barriers existing in
caregivers can complicate staff-patient relationship and, hence, the proper evaluation. The other
course for explaining why refugees do not seek mental health services once they are resettled is
that they distrust the authorities since they were persecuted.
Formulating postwar psychological requirements is crucial to have both refugee-oriented and
ethnosensitive interventions. Hire staff from diverse cultures, cultural sensitivity training for
personnel, sign languages, culturally appropriate service delivery, culturally guided therapy,
consultation with traditional healers and spiritual leaders, the use of multicultural community
relation officers, and treatment modalities based on multiculturalism or cultural etiology of
suffering. Although this may be challenging, catering for the refugee as a whole person and
P a g e | 77
meeting his/her needs in a culturally appropriate way enables the refugees’ past and their feat to
be recognized. Mental well-being is also crucial since there are generally no other chances to
reconstruct identity because of cultural shift obligatory in the course of exile. All in all, culturally
sensitive care may mean that the assimilation that the resettlement processes entail opens for
healing in accordance with the refugees’ cultural endowment.
- Community-Based Mental Health Initiatives
Decision on mental health is among the success aspects towards a successful resettlement on the
new land in order to ensure that the affected people get more support after going through trauma
and fleeing from their homes. It is further confirmed that refugees will exhibit higher rates of
mental health problems like PTSD, anxiety and depression from well documented violence and
loss in war. The barriers to engage the affordable, as well as the culturally sensitive healthcare
are existent. Community programs help in order to eliminate gaps. Merrymaking and related
activities such as group sessions nurture rapport and relationship among resettled refuges and as
such, offset loneliness and prejudice while dealing with adversity. By providing training in
MHFA, for resettlement staffs and refugee leaders, is also able to raise local awareness and
understanding of the potential signs of distress. Other local measures are the lack of financial
constraints to clinical services through fund support and have transport facilities. Other
stakeholders such as religious centers and cultural associations also assemble and de-stigmatize
mental health and encourage others in the community to consult standard professionals because
these leaders have earned their trust. Most relevant is during the first years of resettlement,
because the re-settlers are the most likely group to develop mental health issues in the course of
the change. It is stability that school-based interventions build in children, to a significant degree.
Teachers and counselors assist with these learners and for instance: handling of issues of conflict,
P a g e | 78
or individual management of students with trauma. With regard to the adults, the activity in
community gardening and artistic undertaking is not only practice of the skills but is useful for
clinical practices in anxiety and depression. Above all, the key point is that the community-based
approach increases the availability of the healthcare in a way that does not take away people’s
cultural identities as they try to reclaim their sense of purpose and worth. They use natural
communal resilience instead of envisioning trauma as an individual’s experience, and the
importance of social bonding after calamity. Of these, those by refugee groups for local
organizations themselves may be particularly promising. It is easier to discuss communitive
programs as opposed to programs provided for communities since the former is pegged on
experience as well as agency.
- Challenges in Providing Mental Health Support
Maintaining adequate mental health service remains a challenge among the displaced persons
within the refugee resettlement contexts. Refugee groups are inherently violating high levels of
stress, and include the experiencing or receiving of physical aggression, threats of and actual
physical assault, and death of close members of the family. It has manifested in cases of post-
traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression among others. Managing such conditions,
therefore, requires skillful handling of cultural circumstances, care, trust and safety, the
maintenance of continuity of care, treatment, and education. However, as will be seen, contexts
of resettlement are problematic in accommodating all these requirements. Lack of awareness on
the part of the mental health system, preconception about seeking psychiatric help, and language
issues are also the hindrances to the right referral. Refugees also face severe access barrier costs
including; fee that has to be paid, mode of transport, knowledge about available services, and
their personal health literacy. Moreover, making care even more inaccessible for refugee
P a g e | 79
communities, such services’ providers generally do not believe in government systems and the
Western biomedical model after what they went through. This is established when patients take
their cares within a long period and within this time, they are treated by the same
caregivers. Nevertheless, high staff turnover impacts this important relational process. The
mitigation of these consequences be may be enhanced by assessment and intervention soon after
resettlement when care needs are the primary focus of early phase of services. Last but not least,
lack of psychoeducation concerning the trauma, mental health and support can make refugees not
seeking help. While they are beginning to overcome some of these difficulties through specialist
services in some of the refugee resettlement programs, the issue cannot be entirely addressed
without broader changes. This incorporates hikes in funding, more aggressive advertising, and
wider definition, ‘survivor -oriented’ models of service delivery, culturally sensitive therapy,
anti-stigma publicity and inclusive care models for refugees. Mental health barriers cannot be
considered as an extra feature that must be incorporated into the problem of the resettlement
process. The integration outcomes are enhanced and the hosting countries are provided with
moral rationalizations by the provision of trauma sensitive mental health services for refugees at
the onset of integration.
9. IMPACT ON HOST COMMUNITIES
The act of Refugee resettlement focuses on the relocation of refugees from the disturbed areas of
their home country to host communities, this has multifaceted repercussions that brings option as
well as dynamics. On the positive side refugees compete for jobs in vacancies, they act as
consumers and contribute to the development of the economy, the refugees also introduced new
culture to the society and are the agents for change specifically in decaying areas. To exemplify,
several German, Swedish and Canadian city areas received thousands of refugees from war in
P a g e | 80
Syria, and Arab entrepreneurs promptly initiated grocery stores, restaurants and bakeries and
other facilities which provide employment as well as necessities of life. But once they come,
once they find themselves in new homes in large groups within a short span, they tend to put
pressure on the available local structures and services. There may be inadequate human resources
in terms of teachers and the physical resources to meet a growing number of school-going
children who speak more than sixty languages. To some extent lack of accommodation may
increase the cost and the rent in view of the fact that it is scarce initially. Employment
opportunities: jobs that are in high demand in the organizations especially in the community
health clinics include translators and cross-cultural specialists. It also implies the ability to cause
conflict situation, where misunderstandings and ethnic differences may appear between people of
the host country and immigrants. Where refugee groups are forced to live in region whose
income per capital is low then the poverty and crime may increase due to lack of jobs. In other
words, in the long run, the studies have indicated that refugees contribute positively to the
economic development of a country. It is also noted that after five-ten years of receiving the
status of refugee, refugees ’employment, education, earning and public assistance are almost as
good as that of the native-born persons. Maintenance of community relations is also useful if the
process of cultural adaptation should be prolonged on both parties. Thirdly, any stakeholder
seeking to clarify refugee resettlement must appreciate that it holds tangible negative potential
for the welfare of immediate hosting communities in the short-term while the right degree of
investment in successive integration processes will protect social cohesion and help ensure the
identified communities get the social and human capital that arrives with refugees. It should
include goal-activated and need-interpolated engagement from communities and in partnership
with Sadie’s leadership, people turn the process of making refugee dom a win-win for everybody.
P a g e | 81
- Social and Economic Impacts of Resettlement
When a huge number of refugees get into other societies, certain social and economic impacts
are likely to occur to those societies. On the economic impact refugee may cause a pressure on
the infrastructure and other social facilities if not appended properly. If refugees appear, schools,
hospitals, housing, and labor markets including other infrastructure may struggle to handle the
new supply. This may cover amongst other areas of transport, sewerage, water, electricity, and all
other related services. From a fiscal point of view, it refers to the outgoings in terms of the
program of processing and initial settlement of the refugees; fiscally, the refugees become a net
receptacle of funds once they start working, but the initial costs are high. In a cultural perspective
therefore, it is clear that demographic changes as brought about by refugee influxes are capable
of causing socially transformative effects where timely interventions are not made.
Misunderstanding regarding refugees may then be followed by prejudice and racism. Refugees
also have a poor command of the local languages and other barriers which make their integration
into the society a difficult ordeal. Last but not the least, because of the traumatic past many of
refugees have undergone, their integration might not be easy and can put pressure on mental
health, as well as social services. It also means that there is need for proper planning and
resource mobilization for the host communities receiving refugees in other to minimize these
impacts. Some of the strategies for resettlement therefore ensure that special attempts are made
to assess and strengthen other civil and business support systems such as institutions to prepare
them for the refugee before they are resettled. They give out money for orientation programs
with a view of improving the cultural difference that may be observed between the refugees and
other dwellers in the community. Some of the area that incorporates economic and social
reconstruction include job training, language classes and discussions between the refugees and
those in the respective areas of settlement. Such investments assist so as to minimize such
P a g e | 82
dependencies and assist refugees to turn into producers in the society without much delay. If the
kind of migration demanded by resettlement threatens to overwhelm the capacities of these
communities, national governments and international aid organizations have to bring in more
funding. The nature of the programs that often go unfunded are the programs that are liable to
trigger resentment among host communities. Therefore, finally, it is suggested to comprehend
that calculation of the positive humanitarian and economic outcomes of the realized refugee’s
resettlement as unconsciously involves impact management oriented at shaping the social
cohesion and economic relations between the refugees and the receiving population. If well
developed, hosts could be in a favorable position; increased economic returns, improved trade
with the refugees’ countries of origin, meeting demand for labor and establishment of
ethnologically diverse societies. Yet, winning this relation requires influence and popular support
in the third country and among its government before the refugees are even there.
- Community Reactions to Refugee Resettlement
It is clear that regardless of the setting, chiefs and heads of states find the figure of refugees to
always have an effect one way or the other. Thus here one needs to state that welcoming is
actually accepting the stranger entirely, while rejection is both being indifferent and, in some
cases, even hostile to the stranger. concerns that emerge here are invariably the concerns relating
to the local resources and services due to a group of people who are, in most instances, being
rehabilitated and who have many needs. It impacts areas such as shelter, medical facilities,
schools, and employment opportunities especially in average cities and countryside which are
chosen by refugee placement agencies to spread refugees in different parts of USA.
Despite the fact that the process of refugee resettlement is a slow one whereby refugee start
reawakening the resting communities over time, the process is often painful especially as
P a g e | 83
communities are thrown back into the clash of new and unfamiliar cultural practices and the
scramble for affordable houses to rent and low wage employment. This therefore means that
when there is language difference, this reduces communication and interaction between people.
People of the society might be ready to take refugees in their society but they might lack the
cultural aspects needed to share the same society with such people. The concept of interpersonal
relations or systematic exclusion is examples of when both types of discrimination are present.
Yet, there are hundreds of communities that self-organize in order to make refugees’ life easier
and donate whatever could facilitate life in the new country.
The agencies involved in the resettlement work as brokers between the refugees on one hand
and the community of the host country on the other with a view of facilitating the positive
integration. On local issues, they communicate through awareness and sensitization aimed at
demystifying some issues. They are in close touch with schools, hospitals, police and employers
in order to improve the community’s capacity to assimilate the new comers in a right manner.
Education in cultural orientation and language acquisition makes refugees to gain employment
and integration, thus, become active members in society. As societies are more multicultural in
nature integrated process of refugees is a mutual of assimilation. This integration is a lifelong
process, and one must invest in it from generation to generation and, at the same time, it always
meets certain challenges; but the benefits of maintaining ethnically diverse, diverse societies are
great and have a positive impact on society and the economy.
- Role of Local Governments and Community Leaders
There are separate local government and non-government organizations that are involved in
refugee resettlement, and monitoring integration of refugees in this new society. This is so
because as people relocate to other areas, state governments are compelled to respond to new
P a g e | 84
needs such as shelter, health care, education and employment. Civic association employees,
people in religious organizations, schools, and organizations for supporting refugees serve as
intermediaries who help refugees in obtaining services and improving relations between refugees
and the communities.
When local governments pre-identify and assess potential refugee ‘hot spots,’ they can also
trigger convening a host of health, education, housing, and welfare departments and agencies
prepared to receive and assimilate them. For instance, funding to hire more teachers and sign
language interpreters in the education centers where many refugee students learn. Or merging
city and county budgets in order to raise the quantity of price-convenient housing. This way local
planning tackles the hatred that emanates from perceived competition for employment and other
necessities by refugees.
Community leaders also participate in the process of advocacy and sensitization – convening
meetings to deliberate on the issues of RRPs and countering anti-refugee sentiments; raising
consciousness of the cultural values of different groups of refugees and facilitating the social re-
orientation of such people and availing to them other service wants, including schools, places of
worship, interest groups. It also helps in the society’s awareness and unity within the society. It
also enables one to develop expectations of discrimination, exclusion or even harassment of
members of the different refugee groups and prevent it.
As much as the issue of refugee resettlement might be a challenge on how best to maximize on
the resource available to the local government, pre-planned reception strategies for the in-flows
will post better results than when strategies are formulated later. Political and community support
ensures that the programs meet the humanitarian requirement of the society they are in, and are
P a g e | 85
welcomed by the society, and also prepare refugees to be privileged to bring about positive
change socially, economically, and culturally to their new society.
- Building Inclusive Communities
On balance, the integration of refugees into new societies is beneficial, even if the challenge of
constructing a society where all members are welcome is not without its relative merits.
Integration process is a mutual process where the refugees and the host societies meet and have
to find ways and means to communicate. Community leaders can help this process by suggesting
what intercultural learning activities to be provided so that they complement and reinforce
people’s experiences. It promotes intercultural contacts and helps to develop tolerance and
acceptance of those different from oneself. For longer term resettlement outcomes, social
integration and inclusive institution building at the community level is therefore very important.
This means creating spaces of engagement for refugees in sectors like education, health,
employment, participation and voting, and governance. The findings of this study show and
support the argument put forward earlier that if refugees can only engage in the social and
economic life of the host societies right from the early stages of their integration then this will
lead to improved resettlement outcomes in future. Discrimination, isolation, lack of language or
professional skills are among the features that are in the way of integration and thus, policy
measures needed to address these issues are required. Best practices like the Global Refugee
Youth Consultations, which are carried out by the UNHCR across the globe, demonstrate the
relevance of the refugee in deciding on policies within his/her own life and that of a community.
When other principles of active participation are practiced within other refugee resettlement
programs, it produces positive effects not only to the refugees themselves but also to the society
in accepting communities by embracing diversity as valuable asset. It is further recommended
P a g e | 86
that more comparative researches have to be undertaken in order to provide policy makers and
communities with new paradigms for local integration and social inclusion. Uganda is one of the
few states in the modern world that is experimenting with new models of protection of refugees
in Africa, Canada is among several developed countries that are gradually implementing the new
compact, an innovative model of hosting refugees and Colombians are among the few hosting
communities in the region who are struggling to deal with the challenges of hosting refugee
influx.
- Addressing Community Concerns and Misconceptions
Ignorance or rather appreciation by the community and individuals is one of the main issues
which can act as a great challenge in the refugee resettlement process. Speculative apprehensions
are that refugees burden the welfare state or for the jobs with locals, they carry terrorism or a
subversive view. That is because uncertainties and prejudices influence refugee integration and
generate negative emotions that work against the construction of a harmonious society and the
increase of the standard of living among refugees. To eliminate these concerns and dispel
misconceptions, one must connect, elaborate or dispute the matter. Concomitantly, Huot et al.
(2019) and other researchers advise that it was important to convey possible socioeconomic
benefits of resettlement through media and outreach. For instance, talent and refugee
entrepreneurship translates to addressing labor demands, business creation, and increasing the
consumer demand. The role of media in promoting positive attitudes and raising people’s
awareness of the representatives of inclusive communities cannot be underestimated. Such
dialogue groups as a way of refreezing engage refugees and citizens to create the discomfort
needed to displace stereotyping of each other. Good initiatives provide the training, the education
as well as the proper and right tools that aims to educate and promote patience, empathy and
P a g e | 87
trust. The government agencies are also equally involved in allaying the fears by explaining the
right security process information and also pointing them to the duty of care. It calls for system-
wide action, but one that must pay most attention to ‘the community level’ if it is to be
sustainable. Where integration barriers are countered with mobilization, communication, and an
assurance of real and timely information, refugees are more secure, and indeed respect
themselves more, and where host communities get a feel of multiculturalism or/and economic
advancement. Jahnsen (2019) & Gozik (2021) have opined that the benefits, such as integration,
employment, language, and cultural awareness, have to be guided through volunteer and
mentorship to grow and optimize the goodwill accrued locally. Forums show that when the
community is patient enough to welcome the newcomers and embrace them with an affectionate
spirit, then the licking of the wounds is made, as well as everyone gears up to move forward.
Research also shows that when those refugees are painted not as beggars or criminals to be
feared, but as assets to boost economic and hone cultures, fear that leads to exclusion is
eradicated. These fixed barriers suggest great possibilities for transformation of pathogenic
cognitions that limit group and personal being. Work must continue, but it must move forward
from merely providing infrequent intermittent relief of emergencies to the establishment of
efficient conditions in which all can develop to the best of their capabilities and can become well.
Thus, through the cooperation of all the systems under the view of equality and empathy, refugee
resettlement programs to many societies all over the world can be achieved.
- Success Stories in Host-Community Integration
Given the challenges refugee integration with their hosting communities is crucial if the result is
to be positive for host communities and refugees. Major integration outcomes are easily realized
when Community, Voluntary and Statutory Organizations and the resettlement agencies interface
P a g e | 88
with the refugees. An example of this is the Bhutanese-refugees that currently reside in St. Louis
a city in Missouri State of the United States of America. Of course, as the reports have it, more
than 80 Bhutanese families have been relocated to St. Louis by resettlement agencies since 2008.
Stating that the things were not so easy for such newcomers, the locals united with the offices
dealing with resettlement and formed organizations aimed at assisting the migrants. The English
language and cultural orientation were facilitated by the International Institute of St. Louis and
the leaders were helped to get their employers through the St. Louis Mosaic Project. Interfaith
partners such as local churches helped refugee families in St. Louis to cope with the daily life of
a refugee. The outcome generated was the existence of a lively Bhutanese cultural neighborhood
perfectly enclosed in the city limits. Bhutanese refugees started to open ethnic grocery stores and
restaurants, film-makers and dance groups, and started to celebrate their cultures. Such initiatives
required that the city government officially admit and host BHUTANES DAY in the city of Saint
Louis. St. Louis was able to take integration challenges, always complex in one way or the other,
and convert into intricate success which only required both the public and the private aspects to
work as one, similar potential can be seen in other communities all over the country. If refugees
become part of communities through orientation programs, offered language programs and
helped with employment in host nations, the future of those nations’ cultures and economy is
bright. The documentation and documentation of the achievements of the community integration
shall be important in refugee resettlement programs in the future. The above two groups of
people can therefore both sit down and write success stories for integration where necessary,
when there will be the right level of interaction.
P a g e | 89
10. CHALLENGES IN REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT
Refugee Agencies are under a lot pressure in as much as providing the needed services and
support to refugees arriving into their countries. A major problem in this case is the question of
funding and support in sufficient amount. The problems affecting the resettlement agencies
include the following; little funding to support quality programming and assistance due to the
high challenges faced by refugees such as trauma, loss, interrupted education among others;
Resettlement agencies always struggle with high turnover of employees. Employees have huge
workloads to cope with and it is quite onerous task to orient the new refugees to a different
society and its many requirements in as much as they seek for integration in the new country.
Another colossal social problem is the problem of shelter especially affordable shelter. In so
doing, it has been observed that demands for immigration have brought about increased charges
in the affordable house prices much to the disadvantage of the poor in most receiving countries.
If refugees cannot get better and a safe shelter, then their efforts to get a job, education, health
care and so on, and their integration, are in danger. Integration also has also been influenced by
language; people with diverse languages are not well privileged to access the services. While
resettlement agencies arrange for language classes, acquiring fluency is not a very quick process
that one can undertake. At the same time, the absence of language hampers refugees’ ability to
build friendships, to comprehend procedures and get a job or continue education, and to feel at
ease in a country granting asylum.
The social aspect, as well, becomes a problem since refugees also suffer social isolation quite
frequently. Having such a construction of community and belonging is therefore an important
aspect to the recovery process and to being able to reintegrate. However, there are some limits
which hamper connection with the receiving communities which are cultural and linguistic
P a g e | 90
limits. intake organizations try to enlist the support of community organizations and cultural
intermediaries to prevent social exclusion; to serve as middlemen. However, because of a
scarcity of staff, workload hitches capacity at this front as well. It also impacts on refugee youths
in the same manner as well, because they also crave for peers, and groups and/or fellows within
their schools and new neighborhoods.
Despite the continued success in the achievement of a second chance to millions of individuals
through the refugee resettlement programs, we outline below systematic stress and flaws
indicating the areas of improvement. Enhancing the resettlement hence requires a way of
providing more of funding, capacity and other policy solutions to problems such as the provision
of affordable housing among others. Battling all of these integrated concerns remains relevant so
as to guarantee that resettlement programs afford equal opportunities and the best integration
effects for refugees. Besides having an orientation towards the individual refugee, the need to
invest in quality resettlement has value beyond the current generation because refugees are very
hardworking people, and once assisted during the integration process, they will contribute to the
new society.
- Political Opposition and Public Perception
Refugees face many barriers in host countries some of which are; political barriers and perceived
negative attitudes. It may be taken by politicians as the opportunity to use xenophobia in some
areas of the local community to present refugees as being a security threat or a burden to the
economy of the country hosting them. It leads to public myths’ creation and does not make the
integration of refugees easier. For example, a study that was conducted on Congolese refugees
residing in the United States depicted that policy language served a negative impact on
perception by the public. The politicians stressed refugees’ poor job market outcomes but they
P a g e | 91
did not recognize external systematic barriers to decent-paying jobs interrupts refugees.
Consequently, the public obtained a negative attitude toward refugees as considering them as idle
persons who could not enhance the economic productivity. In fact, the refugees get job in low-
wage employment sectors which are otherwise vacant by ‘indigenous’ citizens and therefore
become the occupants of Feasible jobs. But residual disadvantageous perceptions within the
political sphere can be used to justify the narrowing of resettlement endeavors.
Besides shaping the people’s voter attitude to negative campaign messages, local bigotry is also
created. A study that was done on the Sudanese refugees in Australia showed the media depiction
of problems attributable to gang violence and crime helped in stereotyping thus increasing
discriminative outcomes inclusive of exclusions in learning institutions and workplace besides
isolation adding other challenges that refugees face regarding language, qualification and
acculturation. When in politics, politicians can purposely employ xenophobia because if there are
negative reactions, these reactants are mobilizing factors. However, consciously using refugees’
hardship to get political votes without thinking of their impact on the refugees demonstrates the
ethical poor leadership that has led to the failures of resettlement programs.
Last but not least, even if refugees from their countries have to go through such extremely
traumatic scenes, political processes are capable of recreating the atmosphere in the potential
adopters’ countries. Overcoming fear-motivated messages and fighting such oppression reduces
life possibilities for autonomous existence that refugees need to construct new existence, such
misinformation leads to potential of policies moving even further to the right in terms of punitive
measures against refugees than in support of the needy. Hence, political opposition and effect
that it has on members of the community are factors that amount to pressure that are likely to
frustrate any efforts towards organizing refugee resettlement programs. Like when one calls on
P a g e | 92
leaders not to be ruthless, not to use this and that as a tool, when another calls on the citizens to
be informed and another when calling on leaders to be ethical in performing their responsibilities
for the welfare of the society.
- Resource Constraints and Funding Issues
While refugee resettlement as a concept is easy to understand; implementing it proves quite
difficult as these programs face capacity as well as funding challenges. That involves a great deal
of spending as regards infrastructure, and social amenities like housing, health care, learning
institutions, language acquisition, employment opportunities among other necessities.
Nevertheless, many agencies for resettlement of these refugees do not receive adequate funding
and the available facilities are mostly bought from government and state grants. These are
frequently highly targeted, so agencies are not able to award money where it most needs to go.
Secondly, grants are tied to the numbers of arrival of refugees per year and the budgets and
services of agencies continue to be vulnerable to cut and changes on existing policies.
These aspects are, thereby, realized in practical terms for refugees as well as their communities’
Resource. Temporarily the demand for affordable housing overwhelms the temporary stock, and
sometimes families of four or five might be found living in one or two rooms. All pressured
public education systems have challenges of funding quality English and mainstream curriculum
for NASELLs: For refugees displaying physical and mental traumatization, Medicaid
reimbursement delays distort their ability to access quality health care which includes physical
and mental examination and treatment. However, the cutting down of the complementary state
and local social service funding on which the refugees rely on as the ultimate resort aggravates
the federal funding shortcoming.
P a g e | 93
It remains important to remember that private organizations and concern with the cooperation
of groups of the community are the basis of the infrastructure of refugee resettlement in the
United States. However, the lack of federal initiatives and leadership in the country on refugee
problems demobilizes the public and makes it less aware of the problem. Private backers of
refugees thus contribute a progressively greater share of the funding and of the manpower that is
required for the resettlement process. However, by the same token the problems such as donor
and volunteer turn-over or what can be referred to as Sponsorship fatigue also arise in the local
resettlement communities. Such trends raise useful questions about the viability and capacity of
resettlement programs when refugee admissions go back to previous numbers following the low
of the Trump presidency.
Therefore, it can be argued that the achievement of the targets of the refugee resettlement
program requires long-term endeavors with regard to financial support provided by different
service domains. These contemporary funding constraints of the policies emasculate the
capacities of the agencies to facilitate refugees’ self-sufficiency in its totality. In the future the
better coordination of the budgets at the federal and state levels along with the local level and the
private levels can assist to construct a better approach regarding the integration of refugees and
assimilation of the communities. However, future large-scale policy changes could be probably
needed to adapt the funding model of refugee resettlement.
- Coordination Among Stakeholders
The task of having to report to so many stakeholders in the process of resettlement of refugees is
another challenge. Certainly, resettlement can only happen when there is a willingness from the
federal, state, and indeed the local government agencies, non-profit organizations, communities,
employers, healthcare providers, school districts, and so on. All have a large but rather
P a g e | 94
diversified role in the process of the refugees’ integration into the American society, from arrival
to additional help and support. However, there is no coordination in the bottom across these
entities regarding priorities, resources, information, and duties assigned; as a result, refugees
suffer due to evolving inefficiencies and gaps. For example, the refugees will be provided with
services like the referral to places of employment but will not be provided with transport to the
places of work. Or healthcare enrollment may happen without language service to assist with
scheduling an appointment with doctors. There can also be issues of timing in as much as the
vouchers for houses or school enrollments are not well timed to coincide with the refugees’
arrival. Hence, promoting better co-ordination is always very important to the success of
organizations but not very easy due to the varying nature of self-interests of different players.
Policy objectives and the needs on the side of the refugees are the areas that many government
agencies struggle to balance all the time. They are commonly organizations whose funding is
usually low, and the scale of operations is relatively small. Employers, we should bear in mind,
act in a business-like fashion and are chiefly motivated by business concerns. But it is an area
wherein stakeholders have to play a more active role for the resettlement process to succeed.
Suggested solutions are having joint regional coordinators to stop silo working, integrated
databases to erase data differences, standard forms of reporting to flag up more issues at an
earlier stage and integrated planning and budgeting for priorities between agencies and other
stakeholders. Still the coordination solutions must be country specific and are part of the
domestic stakeholders since the problems in every receiving society are different. If more
streamlined and idea-oriented studies are conducted in the present study area, more innovative
mechanisms pertinent to the aspects of refugee resettlement may be revealed that can lead to
further adjustment in other areas. Understanding more accurate and precise the role of the actors
P a g e | 95
involved in the resettle of refugees will improve the integration of the various actors, and,
thereby, decrease possible barriers for refugees seeking new lives and opportunities.
- Legal and Bureaucratic Hurdles
Refugee experiences that seek to build a new life in new countries experience legal and
bureaucratic hurdles, which either further elongate displacement or an unsuccessful integration.
This includes changing of status through going through some administrative procedures in
various offices in the government for identification, security clearance, travel documents and
anything else regarding resettlement. However, both empirical and theoretical evidence show
why institutional capacities do not scale up to meet global displacement crises. These backlogs
can easily run into tens or hundreds of thousands of requests in most of the applications. That
means a single PHQ2 can employ numerous calls to the domestic agencies and to the UNHCR
and the others. When there is communication breakdown between several agencies or lack of
uniformity in record keeping and sharing practices then mistakes that lead to freezing of cases
occur.
Other hurdles are eligibility and admissibility criteria that refugees undergo in their application
of the few opportunities available to resettle. Others are health status, age, fluency in English and
religion. As for these criteria, new policies changing these demands cause uncertainty which
applicants feel, apparently, they await the outcome for months, or years. Further, refugees bear
desperate, almost no capacity to generate official documents that would bear core details of who
they are. Erasing the self from the memory is also a legal process of measuring the crosscurrents
of contradiction and piecing back together the self. For instance, if one plays a simple ‘guess
who’ and looks at most television anchors’ home town or date of birth, one might stop to think.
The longer displaced persons are out of touch with depleted bureaucratic structures, the harder it
P a g e | 96
is for the refugees to corroborate these details. At the same time, the clock as to one’s entitlement
to be resettled is always ticking.
Finally, after arrival legal and bureaucratic infrastructure are even more problematic with which
to deal. Facing complex and organized public service systems, obtaining papers like Social
Security cards, registering children in school under this rather ambiguous residency status are but
some of them. Mar, looking so routine as the schedule immunization update or the language
proficiency tests, when unmet, can compromise immigration statuses. But there are few that are
educating the refugees of various other statutory provisions and guidelines that they have to
abide by on their own and as such the refugees become by default on the wrong side of the law.
Therefore, the ability to gain the necessary knowledge to build a life in a highly technocratic
society becomes one of the competencies that will enable refugees to be in a position to access
the services they require and make the necessary adjustments. It is admitted that simplification of
numerous rules in the framework of the operation can contribute to the success of the
resettlement process greatly.
- Long-Term Sustainability of Resettlement Programs
One of the key areas that require implementation in refugee resettlement is the capability and the
future of the sustainability of the resettlement programs. Temporary asylum is granted in the first
instance and after some years, refugees are expected to fend for themselves. However, attaining a
sustainable independently is still a very rigorous task for many who are fleeing from war, and are
either devoid of any skills that can enable them to find a job, other than perhaps doing menial
jobs, and those who cannot converse in any of the several languages spoken in the country. In
this research, the authors have proved that after refugee labor migration, five years after the
refugees have resettled in another country the employment rate is at 50- 60% proving that
P a g e | 97
refugees have not fully integrated in the economic market yet. Others are issues to do with health
care, housing, cost of transport and cost of healthy foods, and also availability of health care. Of
cultural adaptation, it may also have required time especially for one who has migrated of from
another very different society. Thus, it is still difficult to sustain the programs of resettlement,
and therefore the question of long-term: It is important to bear in mind that people require
support not only throughout the powers, but throughout their entire lives on such aspects of
furthering their abilities, education, training, adaptation, and orientation as vocational; and
language; re accreditation classes and classes and apprenticeships in small business; behavior
health treatments and sessions; and affordable childcare; and Hypothesized less guiding and
more adaptable paradigms, which are tied to refugee’s rates of integration and assimilation, may
be more constructive in order to accomplish the goal of independent living for the refugees.
However, developing such supports poses issues of resource implications on the receiving
communities which is a pointer to the fact that there are tradeoffs in push factors to integration
and preservation of public resources. To balance between the two has therefore always been a
mammoth policy challenge. However, the long-term capital investment for refugees having a
chance of getting to the full self-sufficient level, passes the moral humanitarian test for the donor
country as well as releases the refugees to be active, productive responsible citizens of the
country through productivity, employment creation, innovation as well as culture Bear.
- Ongoing Challenges in Crisis Situations
But even when they are coming out of the fatal diseases, and seek asylum in another country,
they are faced with all sorts of people and severe hardships and crisis and emergencies that we
cannot even imagine. I have listed down some of the irreconcilable wars they wage simply to
live As it has been seen, there are several wars that they wage just to live. Contrary to this, some
P a g e | 98
refugees have never experienced conflict or persecution, but living in poorly-hygienic camps or
congested urban centers with poor standards of nutrition, accommodation, safety, and health;
harsh discrimination; and post-traumatic stress including restricted access to healthcare and
education, for themselves and their families, among others.
The administering organizations for resettlement and the host countries try their best to support
refugees and when they can provide them with what they need, however, with the ongoing crisis
the annual needs are becoming impossible to meet in many cases as of now. While a lot of effort
has been made by the host countries, the refugees have language and cultural barriers challenges
that confines them. Just getting children to attend local schools or getting a decent standard of
living from a reasonable job is almost impossible for most refugees. It was not as though they
woke up one fine morning and said let us go and dump everything we have ever known –
refugees embark on perilous trips in search of safety and shelter because their country of origin is
inhospitable to them. It does not disappear just because one has crossed the borders into the new
territories of acceptable norms.
Thus, they have poor social support, loneliness and as a result – depression, anxiety, grief, post-
traumatic stress disorder for losses and traumatic experiences occurred to them. If refugees end
up in another country, the acts that they perpetrate to make the country of origin quite unsafe do
not cease to exist. It is also expected that past hurts and challenges stay for years or for a lifetime
and pile up the present challenges taking place in the resettlement process. The process that is
followed by refugees who are offered asylum is a long and arduous one which can only be
undertaken with much patience and understanding from the inhabitants of the hosts country.
When refugees’ status is supported by local populations, it becomes possible to form the human,
productive, meaningful existence. But to expect the issues that concern refugees to evaporate the
P a g e | 99
minute they get into safer nations is cooking art and goes against understanding that the conflicts
that the refugees are running away from and the challenges that they encounter despite having to
walk miles in search of a place to build a new life are structural.
11. CASE STUDIES OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAMS
The agencies that are responsible for the resettlement of refugees are supposed to guarantee the
integration of the refugees into their new society and fulfilling this function is always a
challenge. Groups of Somali refugees who were relocated to Lewiston, Maine, from 2001 can be
said to be one success story. Lewiston has so many vacant structures with a shrinking population,
but due to Somali business people who opened other shops including restaurants the downtown
area was gradually rising up from the dusts. The people of Somali Bantu Association of Maine
(SBAM) have been trying to help the integration process through provision of careers advice,
English lessons and translating documents including rental agreements and documents completed
at a doctors’ appointment. Some of the interventions include the following; volunteer tutors in
assisting the students to integrate in schools’ systems among others. While there were some
people with negative attitude toward Somalis in Lewiston initially, the positive attitude people
developed about Somalis in general, as a hardworking people who are willing to work with other
community in integration of new refugees has made Lewiston Somali community acceptable.
But as it is the case with asylum seekers, challenges to the resettlement of refugees are equally
immense. Yet, here too, in Lewiston, there were barriers based on culture and religion as well as
language. Where refugees are dissimilar from resident communities as was the case with Somalis
in rural Maine, there is need for extra community mobilization. The following are some of the
ways that help in the process of assisting refugees to share and recount their stories help in the
deconstruction of prejudice: There are also some issues which can be listed as follows: Refugees
P a g e | 100
have issues with getting professional jobs if qualifications or previous experience is invalid, it
leads to the fact that even qualified workers can only work using certificates; For mentioned
organizations, there could be insufficient funding, particularly in small towns, due to provide
refugees with necessary access to language and career switch courses. This is equally reflected in
the absence of affordable houses in the region that has an effect on the infrastructure, which is in
a constant search to adjust to the ever-increasing population. As a rule, programs include direct
services for refugees for a while after their placement only and they still struggle with needs of
existence such as health, credit, transport, etc. However, as in any Resettlement projects, major
milestones have been accomplished in these areas but such an issue is not an easy nut to crack
and calls for organizational capacity and support from a Resettlement community.
- Case Study: The United States Refugee Resettlement Program
The United States refugee resettlement program can therefore be used as a case study in building
up on what has been achieved and the problems which is facing the resettlement programs in the
world today. As marked by the Refugee Act last 1980 this program is based from the American
tradition of refugee asylum however the modern form is a public-aid federal refugee resettlement
program in a network with private voluntary organizations wherein cash contributions are used.
Program has been active since 1948 and to date about 3 million refugees have been resettled.
They are seen when refugees secure the employment soon after their arrival, and early economic
productivity according to national indicators where they are engaged in one way, manner or the
other in various areas, have greatly boosted government’s revenue collection with over $ 63
billion in the last ten years. The program has also supported other critical second phase
movements through which refugees can travel back and forth between first asylum countries and
preferred destinations.
P a g e | 101
However, the program still continued to face such challenges as declining budgets, appeared
lack of presidential support, and intense opposition from hosts’ communities, which physical
environments do not allow for absorbing more arriving persons. Basic assistance is provided
initially up to 90 days; no infrastructure for trauma-informed services is provided. Some of the
states have also asked to be excluded from resettlement because of financial problems. There are
also issues to do with workforce credentialing and partial recognition of foreign credentials
together with the corresponding jobs. For FY 2020 the ceiling for refugee resettlement is only
18,000 which is the lowest in the history and is slashed by around 89 percent from the previous
year; this means that thousands of approved refugees are still overseas and hundreds of
resettlement offices have been shut. This program that has been in existence for decades of its
existence has not well determined it’s sustainably of given the attempts made by the executives
of the program, to do away with the refugee subsistence. Therefore, despite being widely praised
Internationally as one of the most effective models, enhanced support from the community and
politicians is required for the United States’ refugee resettlement regime to deliver on its
International commitments.
- Case Study: Resettlement in Canada
Leading scholars refer to Canada as one of the best models of refugees’ successful resettlement.
Canada has a tradition of accepting refugees: Thus, private and public sponsorship enabled more
than 286 thousand people in Canada be granted refugee status in 2015-2018. Except for help
from the government, refugees can receive help from other individuals and organizations of the
society. It is this dual-support system that guarantees that more refugees are resettled in Canada
with support from the Canadian government as well as from other global organizations and
P a g e | 102
agencies. After they have settled down, refugees are given elemental health care, education,
language and other services to help them fit into a new society.
In the same context, one achievement is that majority of the refugees stay in Canada beyond the
initial years of their arrival. Of all the New Government Assisted Refugees, after 5 years of
landing in Canada, 85% remains in the country while 95% of New Privately Sponsored Refugees
still reside in Canada after 5 years. Refugee integration policies of Canada have made it possible
for refugees to upscale on the subsequent areas; language, employment, shelter, and social
capital. This makes such refugees give feelings of acceptance in the society to enable them put in
place new lives after their ordeal. Such advantages are also evidenced in the literature:
employment rates are as high as those of people born in Canada after ten years.
Still, the current system of dealing with refugees which Canada has got is its own unique
flavors too. Refugee-processing times in other countries are years, and they stay in tents while
waiting for their turn. The following are the difficulties emanating from the unavailability of
cheap houses in urban areas; Refugees endure hardships in housing. Its providers have claimed
that they cannot adequately support large, inclusive services, and that they are strained.
Inequality in terms of prejudice and discrimination is still evidenced. This reveals that current
situated refugees have severe mental health requirements triggered by their past; however, the
existing system does not address it.
Thus, it can be noted that though the displacement programs are marked with the public private
partnership the Canada resettlement plans offer the opportunity of a new beginning. In as much
as integration policies are well done to get refugees ready for social and economic utility, then
Canada has provided a standard model for refugee resettlement and independence. Additional
refinement to policy to cut transaction time, to build more social and affordable housing, to
P a g e | 103
provide more funding for services, for integration, and for recovery will only improve our
standing internationally.
- Case Study: The European Union's Resettlement Efforts
The EU has developed a number of strategies and policies as a method of handling the problem
of resettlement of refugees in the countries of the union. Of these, the Common European
Asylum System sets common practical criteria for asylum and status determination and
establishment of the common standards of accommodation for asylum seekers, and definition of
who constitutes a refugee. However, the effort to achieve such standards has encountered
problems. For example, there is the Dublin Regulation which outlines which Member State is
responsible for considering an asylum application has placed the major pressure on the Member
States that refugees prefer such as Greece and Italy. To correct this injustice the EU introduced
the emergency relocation plan where asylum seekers in Greece and Italy were supposed to be
relocated to other EU countries; only a quarter of what was agreed was done. Besides, legal
tools, EU financially assisted the feasible resettlement of refugees with other financial assistance
instruments including AMIF. However, what is evident is that there are differences in the levels
of integration provided by the Member States’ resettlement programs. For instance, Germany has
implemented policies in language training, vocational training and housing support policies,
which has assisted in integration into the labor market. On the other hand, the generally negative
attitudes towards immigrants restricted the numbers of refugees that could be resettled in any of
the EE countries which was a few through the EU programs. Such gaps therefore exist between
the EU resettlement policy on the hand and the actual integration opportunity for refugees on the
other hand. To address such complex matters, it would require not only something ordinary like
P a g e | 104
EU normative – but policy, financial, and moral support from within the Member States in the
future to campaign for accepting refugee’s resettlement.
- Case Study: Australia's Humanitarian Program
Australia’s Humanitarian Program began in 1977 and as far as one is assured, it’s one of the most
liberal and effective measures for the refugees and immigrants. This program includes measures
and the ability of being able to accept thousands of refugees every year, granting them permanent
protection in Australia through the visas as well as chance to gain the Australian citizenship. This
has been achieved due to focus on the areas of early intervention and the provision of
collaborative support services. The Humanitarian Program people who come to Australia get
‘Settlement Services’ from the moment they set foot in the country and get a caseworker who
helps them to address the medical, educational, housing and welfare institutions. Considering
these, these services are personalized by targeting the refugee’s needs regarding their age, the
number of their family members, their health conditions or employment history. For example,
refugees with disabilities get medical assistance, mobility aid and equipment while professional
get employment aid.
It has been of assistance in tackling some of the main challenges that affect endowed refugees
in the world over, such as loneliness, joblessness, compromised mental health among others.
Unlike in America, where refugees are set into the society and systems in a state of helplessness,
Australia’s Humanitarian Program is founded on the principles of self-reliance on the one hand,
and social connectedness on the other. A survey of humanitarian migrants in Australia over time
has indicated that humanitarian migrants without doubt have high employment rates, home
ownership, education and citizenship rates. Such outcomes serve to show just how much can be
achieved when the funding for refugee settlement services is facilitated where possible right
P a g e | 105
from their incubation stage. They also apply to fears that the resettled refugees may act as
economic or social burden in their countries of asylum.
Nevertheless, as it will be seen in the following sections, no resettlement program can be
considered as perfect, including the Australian Humanitarian program which can generally be
said to be fairly exemplary in many ways. There are some rude persons who claim that Australia
is able to take more refugees, shut down all the proclaimed asylum seekers’ detention centers
presently in operation and prolonging the time frames of settlement assistance which last from
six months to eighteen months only. All in all, one might conclude that it is possible to speak
about the program as success story of a model which keeps the principle of humanitarianism and
practicality while offering refugee integration possibilities. This emphasis on need-based initial
support for refugees provides guidance that might be invaluable for policymakers who want to
design successful resettlement programs that also will reform refugees for the better in the long
run.
- Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches
It is in this regard that the research findings have revealed that there is perceived variability of
differences in different strategies relating to the resettlement of the refugees. The first and the
most common used in the States is based on the policy of the fast economic integration with
focus on the employment right after the asylum, mainly low-skill employment and orientation
toward getting one’s own job as soon as possible after the asylum. This approach also values the
dignity of a refugee’s work as a means by which a refugee can come out of the cycle of
dependency on public subsidies. Critics argue that it fails to comprehend ‘staying power
integration’ do not consider health, education, voting but also fail to look at the experience and
management goals of refugees. Another approach used in countries such as Sweden is the
P a g e | 106
general state funded integration grants directed in the areas of language, skill, education, health,
housing and employment. While as for facing the fact of being comparatively more expensive for
the state in the first years, human capital development advocates believe that refugees are indeed
able to generate social, economic and civilian returns that are much higher in proportion to the
adeptness of the skills of refugees in future years.
Other techniques are particular specific to the context of the resettlement. For instance, the
structures, which consist of refugees’ diasporas, the policies related to the reunion of family
members, and the previously existing ethnic enclaves are the constituents of the resettlement in
such countries as Australia or Canada. From social relations and connectedness within the
diaspora, refugees are able to locate themselves within the new country. This is in contrast to the
current situation where European countries for example are receiving surge migration flows from
conflict prone countries like Syria. The numbers raise questions on ‘resettlement arrangements’
which have not faced large scale, ethno religiously diverse and traumatized refugees. The
majority of answers is short-term providing and responding to the basic needs of refugees like
shelter, food, and health care while the long-term integration issues are not regarded here as
important as they are in cases where there are groups of refugees defined. In any case, the
general attitude towards refugees – from hospitable to skeptical to openly hostile – becomes
rather important when it comes to local reintegration and available resources. Organizational
integration policies have to address particular societal and structural characteristics and have to
guarantee and respect refugees’ rights and their human dignity. Hence, resource investment in
language, employment, health and community early formations pays regardless of resource
constraints. Stable priorities call for elaborate and context-comprehensible approaches
P a g e | 107
accompanied by continuation and reinforcement of the committed development undertakings as
grounded on the principles of refugee self-sufficiency and inclusion.
- Lessons Learned from Successful Programs
Resettlement needs collaboration between the public and the private domain and NGOs to note
the basic solutions of the refugees and design programs that will enable them to live and/or be
self-sufficient in the new nation. These best practices are as follows: An analysis of the detailed
narrative of the resettlement program in Buffalo New York the following are some of the best
practices that were evident. The refugees stood to directly gain from coordinated cross-sectoral
support in the first instance for shelter, health and employment with language right through their
Ethnic Network. There has been much drive in this integration, which has also assisted in the
progress of the economic redevelopment of the city. Therefore, for the same reason, allowing
local resettlement agencies to develop new solutions according to the different needs of various
refugees was effective as well. On the other hand, when a federally imposed schedule is
integrated, it reduces the agencies’ flexibility to maneuver. On the individual level the best
practice involved using professional interpreter’s in helping the refugees navigate through other
facets of life like shelter, health, learning and money. But translation is a service which requires
funding and this is the case in today’s world. And as a natural consequence, the waiting times
have shown a trend of growth. Another area that is discovered to be sensitive to development is
the aspect of timely availably of translators. Several big scale qualitative studies have also
emphasized the same perception and identified increasing the rates of development of English
language proficiency as essential. Unfortunately, among the refugees, only those who can
quickly find a job that will allow them to earn a living wage, know how to speak it. However,
present ESL programs are under-resourced and non-effective particularly for the illiterate or
P a g e | 108
those with very low literacy levels in their first languages. There are still scanty English
programs, and the ones existing need to have larger coverage and funding. In this connection,
several major issues are identified, such as organizational frequency of visits to the physical as
well as the mental health care facilities. Health care is well illustrated by the fact that the general
health of refugees is determined by stress and malnutrition which are common among them
especially after a war. In organized places, therefore, it is common to build fixed structures to
serve as health centers. Therefore, depending only on the Medicaid services and the number of
clinics in the available nearby centers is still insufficient when a refugee-centered strategy is not
followed. Major areas of discovery include the approach of early involvement of community,
diversification for certain groups of people, translation by professionals, more focused intensive
English teaching and learning programs and focusses and specialized health care services. It is
using collaboration, creativity and commitment to ensure the best practices form part of the
resettlement programs that will develop the programs that will enhance the lives of the people
instead of merely giving them fish.
12. FUTURE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT
The future of refugee resettlement is not devoid of its adaptations and challenges as well. This
means that the global occasions of conflicts and crises are displacing citizens outside their homes
and yet there is still room for refugee resettlement. However, problem in many potential host
countries is political instability which threatens resettlement plans because political affiliation
alters. Recent patterns in refugee resettlement will thus be shaped by what is being currently
achieved or experienced by current refugee resettlement programs.
On the positive side, there many examples of the different communities and organization
involved in the process of searching ways for expanding the number of resettlement programs for
P a g e | 109
refugees and finding the most effective and efficient ways of integrating the refugees into the
local society. But it has witnessed the government and non-government organizations,
enterprises, universities and colleges, and other parties in placing refugees, in teaching them
languages, providing homes, health care, education and the sense of belonging to a society.
When well-funded and provided with a positive reception from the community, such programs
enable refugees to learn the local language, attend school, get decent employment, and become
productive members of the societies of the countries that are hosting them. Positive cases show
that refugees are able to recover from the past ordeal which they have been through and are also
equally capable of being an asset to the receiving society provided, they are well assimilated.
However, significant challenges remain. The political climate has shifted in some countries;
some governments do not want to resettle individuals and, where they do, they only do so in very
limited numbers and at the same time scaled down funding for integration services. There are
some among these communities for which tension flares from time to time in the area that hosts a
large number of refugees. There are some of the communities mentioned below for which
tension sharp rises periodically in the areas that accommodated large numbers of refugees. These
are the principal concerns of admission: economic impacts of entry, acculturation, and security
concerns that play out in debates and decisions about admission. In complex conflict situations,
refugees apply for asylum to countries of the third world that are barely able to satisfy internally
generated demands for development and better living standards among their population, yet the
government of the affected country is compelled to provide for the refugees’ needs as well as its
own citizens. If these challenges are not overcome across sector borders, then the effectiveness
and the sustainability of the resettlement programs themselves is all up for debate.
P a g e | 110
Ultimately, it is clear that only future physical setting of refugee resettlement will be
determined by a collaborative effort of policy makers, business, organizations like this and local
populations on host countries. Developing a clear story that outlines what a victory looks like
and the ethical as well as the economic rationality that comes with it will however define the
tenor from here. A new direction of the refugee programs that exists today will either continue
with what has been achieved or failed on the important global issue. At times when numbers of
displaced persons have never been higher in the global context, it has never been so important
for assisting organizations to play their part in the successful delivery of resettlement programs.
- Emerging Global Trends in Forced Migration
The problems of displacement stays to be an everyday experience and process and with them,
there are emerging new patterns of refugees resettlement. In future decades climate change is
expected to force tens of millions of people from their homes as a result of storms and other
climate-based factors that render an area uninhabitable. On the other part, there are long-standing
conflicts which include Syria conflict, the Afghanistan conflict and other conflicts in some
regions of Africa that continues. For such and other reasons, global displacement increased by
the end of the year to a record 89 million. 3 million in 2022. Many of these arrivals have been
dealt with by developing countries with relatively less capacity to do so such as Bangladesh,
which currently hosts close to one million Rohingya refugees. In the present world today there
have been appeals to developed countries of the international system to absorb more refugees;
however, few countries are willing to open their doors for more refugees which has added to the
criticism of passing the buck.
Obstacles that are inherent to the framework of resettlement concern the need to expand
capacity and also enhance the effectiveness of resettlement in as much as fulfilling the potential
P a g e | 111
for the refugees and their ability to support themselves in a new country. Some of the cultural
integration issues cause public controversy particularly in some nations, these include
xenophobic issues by which some people of another nation competing for jobs and social
benefits are attacked. Compulsory integration activities and digital databases as response
measures are recently used; however, they seem less effective and moral. In addition,
sponsorship is implementing models derived from the cooperation with the public and private
sector, which are also evolving support due to a more reasonable division of costs and tasks.
Education, training and employment matching through the technology is the other interesting
area.
Despite the previous challenges faced in setting up global cooperation for the control of climate
change, avoidance of wars, and sharing of the burden, the rise in global forced migration size
creates a reason. Civil society requires open international policy meetings on strengthening
governance frameworks and massive cash for border cities that shelter refugees. Stopping the
onward movement or facilitating the integration of the IDPs and keep them within their country
of origin might also emerge as a target. Forced as they are to adapt to a new society from below,
business and communities in resettlement countries will most likely have an important impact on
the attitudes of people as well as on the design of proper integration policies. With the
aggravation of crises, the responsibility for the forced migrants and refugees’ future becomes a
burden for the human rights, measures and realistic restoration.
- Climate Change and Future Displacement
Climate change is expected to be one of the most essential drivers of displacement in the decades
to come. Some regions will be made uninhabitable or powerless to support their populations as a
result of sea level rise, desertification, and more frequent and severe natural disasters, as well as
P a g e | 112
resource depletion, all of which are consequences of global warming. This will push many
people to have to relocate from one area to another in the search for fertile land to cultivate,
water and job opportunities. Climate migration has started in Sahel of Africa, islands of pacific
and Indian Oceans and Central America. However, a future climate displacement is foreseen to
go far beyond that witnessed in the past displacement. In the region, the World Bank says climate
change may make up to 143 million cross the threshold to become climate change displaced in
Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America by mid-century.
The relocation of climate migrants departs from the traditional political refugees’ integration
experience in several ways. The scale of displacement will be a lot larger and ideas such as full
Third Country Resettlement will be impracticable when complete. In contrast to refugees and
asylum seekers, climate migrants cannot be clearly distinguished through formal legal categories
according to the existing provisions on this issue. Somewhat different at the moment, due to the
interaction between climate change impacts and other economic, political, demographic and
conflict factors. It is, therefore, essential to pencil down the legal mechanisms in a bid to extend
to the anticipated climate migrants a helping hand. Third it is more of climate change induced
displacements that are internal and not cross-border hence the kind of response required is in
lines with protection, disaster risk management and resilience.
On matters of climate displacement, the questions of justice and rights as well as fair rights of
share of burden are complex. Majority of the developed countries such as the US has in the past
been major emitters of the greenhouse gases that are known to cause climate change. However,
the direct effects are seriously felt at the frontline particularly on the less endowed countries
which in fact have no hand in contributing to the cause of the problem in the first place. Defining
the principles of compensation, the sources of financing adaptations, and how many climate
P a g e | 113
migrants there are to take care of is still tricky. Of even higher importance will be the need to
recognize climate displacement as a public goods problem that will require international
cooperation in formulation of policy responses. Out of the current climate migration, one of the
delicate but necessary processes is the establishment of structures of governance that will
guarantee that the two aspects align.
- Innovative Approaches to Resettlement
Due to increase in refugee and displaced persons globally there is need for enhancing on the
refugee resettlement which also enhance the capacity. Such models include the community
sponsorship program. In contrast to the official government supported and state-funded sponsor-
refugee model, community sponsorship implies a partnership between private individuals who
make commitments and provide crystallized financial as well as social and affective resources
for a specified refugee family. As the Canadian long-standing sponsorship program showed,
evaluate results asserted higher level of emotional health, economic status and integration of the
sponsored families than those of the GA. It also recruits strictly committed new volunteers for
the field of refugee resettlement and helps communities to welcome more families with less
governmental cost. More specifically in the future, use of online digital platforms is expected to
assist in increasing the size of community sponsorship program, in identifying potential
sponsors, in preparing volunteers and in providing continual follow up to the specific groups of
sponsors. These could also have new opportunities to respond to traditional issues of the
resettlement of refugees such as, skill assessment, recognition of qualifications, language training
and employment opportunities. App that translates documents, or that use sign language to help
or apps that provide support in search of house are good use of technology which will enhance
integration for refugees. With regard to program delivery, it was pointed out that predictive
P a g e | 114
analytics and risk modeling could also help provide early indications so that fewer resources will
be allocated to where they are not required and for refugees, which interventions could be
beneficial to each subgroup. If specific databases of case management with complex
involvement and long-term survey tracking of refugees are maintained, then program data for
public viewing, target accomplishment, and program effectiveness may be available. Perhaps the
supporting of the development of data systems, financing of computing education for refugees,
and enhancing use of open forms of data might assist with collaboration and analysis within the
process of the resettlement. Regarding the future development of the integration concept,
integration represents the possibility to attain long-term stability and thereby safeguard against
disturbances in the future.
- Policy Recommendations for Improved Outcomes
The following are some of the policy suggestions that could help towards enhancing the
prospects of refugees’ resettlement in future: First, it recommended that the generation of more
funds for resettlement agencies and the programs will be helpful in improving support services,
and ability to address the up-swelling numbers of refugees to be admitted types of changes. The
resettlement agencies are however, underfunded and have a lot of caseloads with which they
cannot adequately offer adequate case management, employment services, cultural orientation
and translation. Additional funds by the federal agents and states for refugees’ programs, which,
in an ideal world can be applies for by the people who have been relocated to the United States
can go a long way in improving the structure and help in making services delivered to the
refugees better.
Second, very accessible partnerships could supplement public funds and mobilize business,
faith and community actors. Reliance on job-based links, internship or apprenticeship training,
P a g e | 115
housing sponsorship help or service can boost integration and self-help sponsorship. Others
which can also enhance opportunity are those that will foster employers’ awareness of the
refugees and employ them. Federal and state initiatives could otherwise be strategically
coordinated by an office or a task force for such partnerships.
Moreover, changes to the sort of policies that would open up certification processes for foreign
professionals would help more refugees retain their professions rebuilt in the United States; this
would enhance economic returns for refugees, integration, and the quality of life. Other plausible
policies could be provision of grants which would assist in meeting the costs of recertification,
access to bridge training programs and apprenticeship, traineeship and mentorship. Such
measures would decrease the level of skill waste and brain waste among educated refugees,
seeking new employments.
The support to the framework of the education campaigns for refugees and prolonged stayers to
eliminate negative trends regarding each other will help to diminish prejudices and stereotypic
perceptions as well as to strengthen the supportive relations between them. Higher federal
support for further funding and technical support for such programming, that should be created
and delivered with the involvement of the resettled refugees, might also directly improve the
community integration results. Consequently, approaches to the new well-coordinated activities,
increase in the investments, or creation of partnerships between refugees and settlements,
promotion of the professional opportunities and social relations for the effective implementation
of the resettlement activities can be effective for the improvement of the refugees’ situations and
for the host communities as well.
P a g e | 116
- Preparing for Future Resettlement Needs
Due to increasing and new forcing factors leading to forced displacement, it is extremely
important for accepting countries and local populations interested in successful integration to
work out the strategies on how to prepare for further refugee demand for asylum. The
information about the possible variations in the immigration flow and refugees age structure
within months or years can be used to design more adaptable environment for resettlements. At
the moment the political and military tensions that define the direction of refugees and asylum
seekers, the historical refugee movements along with the expected movements provide the
planners with the necessary capacities, resources and time. Resettlement systems need to be
prepared to deal with variation in arrival rates and diversity of the populations which such
mechanisms allow: shocks, as demonstrated by the scale of the European refugee crisis in the last
decade.
Maintaining good relations with the resettlement partners such as housing, interpreters or job
trainers, assistance of scaling up or scaling down according to the work load and requirements.
Education of the communities and sensitization ensure that there is increased understanding and
support to resettlement which will help in preventing backlash when there is a rise in the
numbers of people seeking resettlement. Furthermore, data sharing by the governmental, private
and nonprofit actors also enhances the more coordinated response to the dynamically changing
situation. They foster continuous assessment of the erstwhile rehabilitation activities to ascertain
the strengths and the weaknesses which are then used to build on the gaps identified These types
of research help in developing the means of quantifying the degrees of integration of the refugees
in the long term to enable the projection of the span of assistance needed for every segment of
the demography.
P a g e | 117
Performed during the initial days of refugees’ arrival, the high quality of needs assessments and
individual skills, physical and mental health status facilitates the best matches of social services
and career resources in the light of dynamic community strengths. Finally, culturally appropriate
training for all the parts of the resettlement system, updated for new relevant refugee
populations, means that newcomers will be treated politely to help them through changes
throughout the system. By due conceptualization of optimistic models of effective and efficient
forecasting, coupled with anticipations of flexibility and paradigmatic orientation towards
humanistic responsiveness, the providers of resettlement services across the globe can be well-
alienated in order to meet subsequent humanitarian demand as more certainty is sure to follow
the conditions of uncertainty.
- Vision for the Future of Refugee Protection
Since the crises continue to experience across the world, it is quite hard to predict about future of
refugee protection. Of course, a loftier goal for the years to come would be an attempt at an
organized world protection of refugees’ human rights and their identity. This requires
participation of refugee receiving nations, nations of origin, leaders across the globe, disaster
response organizations and the themselves, refugees.
Thus, the future that is postulated in the asylum politics is that in which countries agree to take
more refugees in and seek to arrange their integration with an emphasis on reintegration. For
refugees to work, learn and integrate, host countries must move from offering relief to
developing solutions that can only be defined as durable. On the same note, origin countries have
to come up with ways of handling conditions that cause displacement in diplomatic manners.
The UNHCR should improve on the available opportunity to meet the needs of the refugees and
the host communities. Release of some of the progressive policies may significantly improve the
P a g e | 118
quality of living of the refugees in addition to bringing economic and social returns to
communities who host the refugees.
Technology could also therefore transform the areas of protection programs for refugees. It has
been found that Apart from Adopting innovative technologies such as; Biometrics, Smart cards,
Mobile Platforms can help in improving efficiency, security, connectivity as well as self-
empowerment of the refugee. Some students, for instance, get their educational resources in
terms of online classes and telemedicine services from their camps or other places of refuge.
greater levels of protection for refugees’ property and their means of subsistence are offered by
digital identification and distributed cash transfers on the basis of the blockchain. Every time
new technologies get available in the market, it becomes the cardinal responsibility of all the
stakeholders to get the right technologies that advance and secure refugees.
Regarding the future, the single most essential component needs a new paradigm for the revival
of the principle of collective responsibility of the nations. Whereas in the past it was very few
countries which had to pay the price for this system, the future shall demand a more equitable
distribution across the world. It is therefore critical that through agreements at the regional level,
joint training, collaboration of funds and comprehensive discussions of states, incentives and
capacities of stakeholders are harnessed with principle of refugee protection that no one should
be left behind. This shared vision means those who are compelled to run are given the respect
they deserve bearing in mind they are refugees and human beings with equal rights. However
this vision IS possible if there is global leadership, cooperation, technology and compassion.
