JHR 425 -ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF SKILLED VS. UNSKILLED IMMIGRATION ON HOST COUNTRIES

P a g e | 1

ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF SKILLED VS. UNSKILLED IMMIGRATION ON HOST

COUNTRIES

1. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LABOR MARKET ANALYSIS

Theoretical models from economics can be used to understand some of the impacts of

immigration in the host country’s labor markets. The amplification of the canonical model is

demand and supply for various skills in the labor market. The source of variation for this analysis

is the immigration–induced shock to the supply of various skill groups where the labor market

effects are then allowed for. The complementarity effect is clearly identified for high-skilled

natives – because immigrants are skilled, they enhance the productivity and pay of natives. Thus,

an increase in the supply of low-skilled natives directly reduces their wages or employment due

to competition with immigrants. The overall effect therefore hinges on the skill composition of

immigration flows. Disentangling these effects endogenously using empirical estimations is a

challenge as native workers may react by shift in occupations or migration within the country.

More recent literature employs quasi-experimental empirical techniques to circumvent these

concerns by identifying a non-immigration exposed control group. Overall, there is evidence of a

negative effect on low-skilled natives and little/no effect on high-skilled. In contrast, research has

shown that low-skilled immigration depresses the education levels of the low-skilled natives.

However, apart from the labor market effects, the net fiscal impact also matters when it comes to

the economic effects – depending on the skill level, tax contributions, consumption, and

utilization of public facilities will significantly vary. Also, it is necessary to consider dynamic

effects which are consequences not only for the immediate labor market. Skills and education of

immigrants determine the dynamics of innovation and technological advancement and hence the

development of the growth path of the economy. Many developed countries attract high-skilled

P a g e | 2

immigrants who are involved in a large number of patent applications. Therefore, in order to

strive to capture the full magnitude of the impact by type of skill, both static effects on the

structure of the labor market as well as dynamic effects on the overall economy level must be

taken into consideration. There are also certain differences within the countries that need to be

taken into consideration. In total, basic theoretical models provide hypotheses on differential

effects across education groups, but empirical evaluation and quantification of such effects

remain difficult. The economic effects, however, are not limited to the labor market interactions

only. Because of these complexities, it is necessary to provide fiscally, dynamically, and

regionally balanced assessments of the economic impacts of skilled vs. low-skill immigration.

a. Human capital theory and skill categorization

Human capital theory is indispensable for sorting workers by skill level and assessing their

effects on the labor markets of the host countries. As postulated by human capital theory,

employees are endowed with a human capital stock comprising of knowledge, education, and

experience that positively affect their performance. These human capital attributes vary

significantly across the immigrant groups. Skilled immigrants are primarily scientists, engineers,

and medical professionals who are educated and possess postsecondary qualifications. Due to

their abundance of human capital resources, they possess higher labor market mobility,

innovation potential, and overall positive impacts on human knowledge. While low-skilled

immigrants may have some education or training, they remain limited in this regard. They tend to

work on low skill, dirty and strenuous jobs such as farming, construction, tourism and related

personal services. Mid-skilled immigrants have average skill levels and are employed in

paraprofessional healthcare support, technical trades, and low-skill professional positions. These

skill categorizations are reflected in theoretical frameworks of immigration and its effects on the

P a g e | 3

labor market. The study also reveals that high-skilled immigrants are net employers for native-

born individuals and positively complement native-born employees. Immigrants with low

educational attainment compete more directly for jobs held by less educated natives and also

perform core manual tasks. Immigrants with medium skills show both detrimental and

supplementary impacts based on occupation details. Appropriately categorizing immigrants and

counterfactually modeling policy through such selection mechanisms is among the most

empirically calibrated work economists have done. In addition to wages and employment,

variations in human capital affect innovation, entrepreneurship, taxes and public finance of

immigrants by different skill groups in ways as theorized but requires empirical and rigorous

examination. Providing for such analysis remains one of the key tenets of human capital theory

at a time when there has been a trend towards the development of more skill-intensive economies

and highly charged debates over high-skill preferential immigration policies currently being

proposed in many western countries.

b. Labor market equilibrium models with immigration

The standard labor supply and demand models can be applied to the study effects of

immigration. An elementary supply and demand structure captures the nature of the labor market

in response to equilibrium wages and employment. Immigration also leads to an outward shift in

the labor supply curve since the size of the workforce increases. The labor demand curve reflects

the various levels of employment by firms at different wage rates. At the intersection of the

supply and demand for labor, the equilibrium wage rate and employment level are established.

The assumption of the market is that the immigrant and native workers are basically similar and

can be easily substituted. Thus, immigrants are a direct substitute to natives, and they bid down

the equilibrium wages and bid up employment. However, if immigrants are not identical to

P a g e | 4

natives in terms of skill, they might not be perfectly substitutable. The effects vary depending on

whether the imports are complements to or substitutes for native labor. For instance, it may

reduce the wages and the chances of employment for low-skilled natives in the case of low-

skilled immigration. However, high-skilled immigration may also lead to enhanced productivity

that may create more jobs for the native high-skilled and low-skilled workers. Extensions explain

for rigidities in the labor market. Minimum wages avoid wages from dropping below a certain

level, these are some of the reasons the employment is shed among employees whose

productivity is below the minimum wage level. Efficiency wage theories posit that companies

pay a wage rate above the equilibrium believing that workers’ productivity will improve. Thus,

immigration may not lower wages because of rigidities, which results in the displacement of

native employees. Imperfect mobility and labor market segmentation can also lead to the

concentration of localized effects in low-skill occupations. Newer models build upon these

elements by adding a layer of heterogeneity to the characteristics of the workers. Micro founded

models of search and matching with frictions in the labor market can be used to understand the

movement between unemployment and employment. Other potential impacts that may be

included to estimate fiscal effects are the impacts on government tax revenues and social welfare

expenditure. In sum, immigration is found to affect the theoretical supply and demand

equilibrium in labor markets in line with the theoretical model examined in this paper, with the

size and nature of such impacts depending upon the views concerning substitutability and

complementarity between immigrant and native skill types. The inclusion of more realistic

characteristics improves forecast performance, but at the same time, hinders the examination of

the outcomes. It is necessary to obtain the empirical data which could complement theory and

P a g e | 5

give an approximation of the real consequences of the variance in the immigrants’ skill mix on

the labor market.

c. Skill complementarity vs. substitution effects

A crucial question when evaluating the effects that immigration has on the labor market is

whether immigrants are competitive with or substitute native-born workers. The skill

complementarity theory posits that immigrants possess skills that are distinct from those of

natives and, therefore, occupy unique positions in the labor market instead of operating as

substitutes. For instance, immigrants are often willing to work at manual-routine jobs that native

workers are not willing to take so that the latter can focus on advanced communication tasks.

This phenomenon, known more technically in economic theories as ‘skill complementarity’

brings about positive externalities for the native workers including better wages. On the other

hand, in the case of skill substitution, immigrants are in the same skill class as natives, and this

displaces natives or lowers their wages. To separate complementarity and substitution effects,

therefore, requires more subtle econometric techniques that would take into consideration

differences in skills of immigrants and natives in the host country. Research shows

complementarity holds most of the time for high skilled immigrants as such immigrants take up

niches in STEM or other areas where human capital is in short supply among the native

population. But, for low-skilled immigration, the picture is somewhat less clear-cut. The effects

possibly hinge on the organization of industries and institutions in the host country. It also means

that in flexible, skill-intensive economies, even low-skilled immigrants may provide positive

production externalities that help natives to better specialize. However, in other scenarios, there

is likely to be substitution especially in the short run before capital is adjusted to the supply of

immigrant labor. Overall, complementarity seems most probable in studies with higher skill

P a g e | 6

disparities within workers on both native and foreign sides. Strong empirical identification

strategies to estimate such heterogenous effects are however still an area of research in this field.

In general, then, although theoretical models facilitate the notion of skill complementarity as a

theoretical reality, it is the realities of labor market structure that condition whether and to what

extent those efficiency gains are actually realized from immigration. Sensitivity in economic

modeling founded on local labor market data is crucial to build credible evidence in this multi-

faceted policy domain.

d. Wage and employment impacts across skill levels

The trade of both qualified and unqualified immigrant employees poses different effects on the

labor market and wages of native-born citizens in the receiving country. According to the

neoclassical economic theory, an increase in labor supply due to immigration decreases the

wages of substitutable native workers and increases unemployment when capital is held fixed in

the short run. However, the extent of these effects depends on the skill level of native workers

and their own skill level. Native workers with high skills are likely to benefit from wage

increases and job availability resulting from skilled immigration by virtue of the

complementarity of production. The native unskilled workers suffer increased competition from

the unskilled immigrants and thus experience declines in their wages and employment levels.

The level of substitutability and complementarity between the immigrant and native workers

depends on the skill level of the two groups. The analysis of the literature demonstrates that

individuals with high skills increase productivity and have positive effects on workers with

higher skills among immigrants. However, the low-skilled immigration has the direct negative

effect on wages of low-skilled natives completing for similar occupations that require intensive

manual labor. Some native workers adjust by shifting to more demanding jobs but tensions in

P a g e | 7

occupational transition can slow their wage increases. These economic effects further depend on

the flexibility of the labor market, mobility of the capital, and the technology used in production.

Current research work for the US and Europe holds the view that immigration reduces wages at

the low skill end but enhances wages and employment opportunities on the high skill side.

Knowing how the skills of native workers compare to the skills of immigrants assists in

forecasting distributional effects in the labor market. In more detail, legal status of immigrants,

their age and gender, time since arrival, and economic conditions moderate short- and long-run

effects. Research should be able to capture these intricate and diverse interactions between the

native and the foreign workers at all skill levels.

e. Occupational upgrading and native specialization

This causes shifts in the occupational structure and employment opportunities available to the

native population of a country in terms of skilled and unskilled immigrants. According to

neoclassical economic theory, immigration leads to an increase in labor supply and thus reduces

the wages of competing workers. However, the empirical evidence presents a different picture.

Some research confirms that immigration particularly of low skilled has least effects on native

low skilled wages, in the long run the effects are negligible as the labor market adapts to the

changes. This may be due to skill complementarity between immigrant and native workers or

occupational mobility of natives to other occupations. For example, low-skilled immigrants may

encourage native workers to attempt to acquire education or get training to get better paid jobs

that demand better English or cultural understanding. Also, the firms are likely to increase output

and/or implement higher quality and more labor-intensive technologies in production. The last

one implies that, if output escalates to the necessary extent, the demand for native managers,

technicians, and professionals could rise. Therefore, some economists offer models in which

P a g e | 8

immigration ‘bumps up’ natives ‘up’ the occupational job ladder. Other theoretical models also

take into account the existence of labor heterogeneity and the inability to perfectly substitute the

immigrant and the native born skill types. These frameworks mean that the wage effects are

contingent with the degree of substitution and complementarity. To empirically test these

propositions, studies must use panel data on natives’ job-to-job transitions before and after new

immigration waves. Research is inconclusive– some works noticed native tendencies to upgrade

occupations due to immigration, while the other detects no effects. Many factors that inﬂuence

the absorptive capacity of an economy include skill quality of immigrants, state of the economy,

and the rigidity of labor market. Permitting natives to focus on communication-heavy and

managerial positions that demand familiarity with the host country, with immigrants taking on

more men

f. Labor market integration challenges and solutions

Immigrants’ labor market inclusion presents various issues that require a multifaceted approach

to solving them. One of the main issues is the lack of portability of human capital where by

immigrants struggle to have their past skills and qualifications attained in their country of origin

recognized in the host country. This can result in deskilling where immigrant workers are forced

to work in jobs that are not commensurate with their education or training. Similarly, the

immigrants may lack country-specific capital such as language proficiency or cultural

understanding, leading to hiring discrimination. The human capital theory opines that certain

investments in transferable and host country specific skills can enhance the employment

prospects of the immigrants. Language and bridging training, skills testing/assessment, credential

evaluation and review organizations, as well as employment services may assist in the proper

placement of immigrants into employment.

P a g e | 9

Employers’ prejudice and discrimination are also counterproductive to Immigrants’ labor market

absorption. According to signaling theory, employers may rely on nationality or migrant status as

a cue for expected performance and base hiring decisions on it. Discrimination laws and

diversity policies are useful to prevent discriminatory behaviors. Another factor that determines

the demand from employers is the incentives offered by the government to provide employment

opportunities to immigrants. Moreover, professional immigrant networks can facilitate

communication regarding the available job openings.

Restrictive immigration policies regarding work authorization documents and complicated visa

procedures also act as barriers to employers’ willingness to offer jobs to immigrants and restrict

their access to the labor market. Standardization and fast-track expatriate visas and permit

renewal are some of the ways that can help to reduce bottlenecks. Pre-arrival bilateral labor

agreements between origin and destination countries to serve the purpose of managed migration

according to the labor market. Regularization programs that grant recovery to the undocumented

immigrant status put such vulnerable workers in the open.

Finally, the studies indicate that the first-generation immigrants tend to live and work in ethnic

concentrations and networks. This is helpful in regard to social support but is disadvantageous in

terms of labor market mobility. Selective approach and transport solutions can help to include

immigrants into the host country’s employment strategies. Sustaining solutions are also enhanced

by the mainstreaming of immigrant integration at the policy level with coordinated inter-agency

efforts supported by adequate resources.

P a g e | 10

2. FISCAL IMPACTS AND PUBLIC FINANCE

This raises the issue of fiscal costs of immigration as well as the consequences of immigration on

the public finances within the context of immigration policies adopted by the host countries.

High skilled immigrants are more productive and hence earn more income and remit more tax

and other forms of revenue to the public exchequer than low skilled immigrants. For instance,

research on the federal revenues in the United States show that college educated immigrants

contribute more than 0, 000 more than what they receive in the federal revenue throughout their

lifetime. On the other hand, the benefits received by those people without a high school degree

are 000 more than the taxes they pay. The net fiscal effect is determined by the origin of the

immigrants – those with education and skills contribute positively to the fiscal balance.

For these reasons, skilled immigrants have overall more positive fiscal impact. They pay more in

taxes due to the fact that they earn more than the lower-scale earners. Welfare and public benefits

recipients, for example, are also less likely to use them at high rates among the tea party

supporters. Moreover, the subsequent generation of immigrants with skilled background

assimilate quicker with the economy and their educational achievement resembles natives. In the

long run, they pay significant taxes to cater for the social price of education, health and

retirement of the native-born population. Such a positive fiscal effect finances public services

and social welfare that are of concern to the general society.

The cost is usually relatively higher for the immigrants who are not so skilled. This makes them

pay less in taxes and receive more welfare benefits in the short run. Nevertheless, for some

generations their descendants may remain a net fiscal burden over the long run if integration is

slow and educational and economic performances of second and third generations remain low.

For countries with a large health and social welfare system financed through taxation especially

P a g e | 11

those in the western Europe the net lifetime fiscal cost of unskilled immigration can be high. In

general, the pattern of selective immigration structure or policy for skilled worker yields positive

fiscal and public finance consequences for the host nations. However, issues of equity,

employment opportunities and humanitarianism are also taken into consideration whenever

immigration policy is being developed with respect to the unskilled populace.

a. Tax contributions of skilled vs. unskilled immigrants

Some literature exists on whether skilled or unskilled immigrants have a positive or negative net

fiscal effect on the host countries. From a public finance standpoint, the key issue arises as to

whether immigrants pay out more in taxes during their lifetime than they consume in public

goods and services. In general, skilled immigrants have higher levels of education, have higher

wages, and pay more in income taxes. In a survey of the immigrants who arrived in Australia

recently, it was revealed that the immigrants who had a university degree paid a net of ,000 more

for the Australian economy than those immigrants who did not even complete high school. The

same is the position in European countries such as Denmark and Sweden. Economists have

found that the net cumulative balance of fiscal effects is most beneficial for the highly skilled

immigrants in relation to the medium and low-skilled immigrant groups. For example, the

estimated net lifetime fiscal gain was over ,000 for highly skilled male immigrants in Sweden

compared to a small net fiscal loss for medium skilled males and around a 0,000 fiscal loss for

lower skilled male immigrants.

Below are some of the reasons why skilled immigrants are more likely to contribute more in

taxes: First of all, the application of the higher wages for skilled immigrants results in increased

income tax and social security contributions. Second, the skilled immigrants find it easier to get

jobs than the low skilled ones – they are able to find employment and earn income and pay taxes

P a g e | 12

regularly. Third, skilled immigrants are less likely to be dependent on social welfare programs,

other government services or be incarcerated, which is financially beneficial to the host country.

Last, the children born to skilled immigrants may possess skills and education that make them

earn higher incomes, and because of this, they will pay higher taxes compared to children from

poor immigrants’ families.

While the highly skilled are likely to earn higher wages, have lower unemployment rates and

consume fewer social services hence a positive lifetime fiscal effect. In conclusion, cross-

sectional studies indicate that there exists a relationship between the level of skill possessed by

an immigrant and their net lifetime fiscal receipt. Due to longevity and increasing social benefits,

most economists suggest that the host country should prefer admitting highly skilled people who

will contribute towards generating revenues to support future social welfare costs. Others argue

that the individuals with low human capital still create positive net economic and fiscal impact in

the long run. However, from the public budget point of view, admitting skilled immigrants offers

relatively higher tax revenues and public finance benefits over time for host countries.

b. Public service utilization patterns

Issues and controversies pertaining to the public service and benefit uptake among the skilled

and the unskilled immigrants in the host countries are quite nuanced. It is, therefore, postulated

that on average immigrants with skills utilize lesser on public facilities than the amount they

contribute in taxes. The immigrants with higher education and higher income levels will spend

less on education, health care, and income support while generating higher income tax revenues.

However, the patterns of utilization are different depending on the details of public finance

systems. For instance, the United States of America has similar usage rates for all immigrants

irrespective of whether they are skilled or otherwise especially due to the Universal Healthcare

P a g e | 13

provision by the states. However, in the USA, unauthorized immigrants with low education

levels are less likely to have private health insurance and much more dependent on the

emergency-only Medicaid. In addition to health care, the other public services that lower skilled

immigrants rely more on are other forms of welfare. This may result from earning less than 000

per year, not having a conventional job that would guarantee employment benefits, having more

people in the household, including children or elderly parents, or limited English proficiency that

would enable them to apply for programs on their own, or the fear of applying due to having an

undocumented status. However, similar to before, the fiscal ramifications are conditioned by the

program regulations – the 1996 welfare reform in the United States introduced five-year bans to

most federal benefits for newly arriving permanent residents. Overall, in every type of service,

first generation immigrants have even less usage than natives, indicating social norms and

perceived threats influence usage more than enrollment. For second and third generation

immigrants there are also significant differences in usage compared to the first period, which can

be associated with patterns of social mobility and changes in the socio-economic status of high

and low-skilled immigrants over time. Although the net fiscal effects of unskilled immigrants

may be adverse at some governmental levels, others argue that many methodological

assumptions underlying most impact studies are questionable noting that dynamic population

impact and the productive contribution of immigrant employees and consumers are often

portrayed in the wrong light.

c. Net fiscal impact calculations and methodologies

To calculate the net fiscal effect of immigration, therefore, involves looking at costs and income.

Calculating expenses includes such components as the cost of the service delivered to

immigrants including health, education, social assistance, and welfare among others, and the cost

P a g e | 14

of the public goods that are enjoyed by immigrants such as infrastructure, defense, police and

among others. Estimating revenues involves determining the amount of taxes paid directly and

indirectly by immigrants through income taxes, payroll taxes, and sales taxes. The net sum is

arrived at by subtracting costs incurred in the delivery of services to immigrants from the amount

of revenues generated from immigrants. It can be steady, calculating flows for average year only

or dynamic, estimating impacts for next coming years. Most studies employ cross sectional

method which is easier to use but less informative than the dynamic model and sometimes

involves the use of projections. Concerns with fiscal equations include which costs and revenues

should be included, how to allocate shares of public goods to immigrants, identifying costs of

extra infrastructure, whether to use marginal or average cost per capita, forecasting costs of

education that will be recovered over an immigrant’s working life, and projecting their future

earnings, taxes paid and consumption of services throughout their life cycle and across

generations. Dynamic models need assumptions on an immigrant’s characteristics such as skills,

educational level, family size and composition because the fiscal one is bound to change given

these aspects. There is also the need to parameterize circular migration in some models of

migration. Fiscal sustainability from the perspective of public finance relates to the condition

whereby future taxes paid less the costs of public services will be discounted at a particular rate.

The specifics of fiscal effects depend on which costs and which taxes are measured, which

population is considered immigrant, how cost-revenue attributions are calculated, forecast

accuracy, and chosen time horizon. The uneducated immigrants, hence receive lower wages and

contribute less in taxes, yet they use more welfare and public services. Therefore, it is

demonstrated that static models depict more adverse net fiscal effect of the unskilled immigrants

in comparison with the skilled immigrants who pay more in taxes, consume fewer public

P a g e | 15

services, and create positive externalities such as innovation, businesses, trade liberalization, and

expansion of the tax base that ultimately benefits the public revenue. Longitudinal projections

show additional positive net effects for both skilled and unskilled immigration cohorts, as

subsequent generations achieve better education and earnings.

d. Long-term effects on pension systems and social security

Concerning the effects of immigration on pension systems and social security, it has been

established that these effects have long-run consequences that are strongly determined by the

skill characteristics of immigrants. New arrivals who are low skilled, have a lower income and

contribute less payroll taxes to support programs such as Social Security and Medicare in the

United States. Nevertheless, they also perform tasks that natives prefer not to do and thus do not

crowd natives at work, but actually fill native jobs. In the long-run, low skilled immigrants could

actually be a small net fiscal cost because the taxes they pay are less than the benefits they

receive. But, high skilled immigrants help gain better wages and contribute more to taxes,

therefore giving a positive net fiscal impact. For instance, calculations have indicated that if the

US opens its doors to more high skilled workers, it could help to support the Social Security

system and actually contribute to its slight improvement in actuarial balance. The skilled,

working-age immigrants can expand the base for payroll taxes and hence improve on the total

tax revenue.

The effects on pension systems also relate to differences in age demographics between

immigrant groups. Youthful immigrants, particularly those with higher skills, will contribute to

revenues for more years than they will consume pension and benefits. The lower skilled and the

elderly immigrants may consume more benefits than they contribute in terms of taxes. Although

they contribute work and consume less public service, particularly education, large unskilled

P a g e | 16

immigrants at young ages can be a burden to pension provision in the future. Consequently, host

countries may target age and skills in immigration policies to more effectively meet pension

policy objectives.

e. Education and healthcare system impacts

The immigration of both white collar and blue-collar workers can be of great influence to the

education sector and health services in the receiving nations. In the area of education, more

immigrants in the school aged population mean that there is need to construct more schools, hire

teachers, establish and fund language and integration schools and other services to cater for

increased enrollment. While numerous studies have tried to assign figures to these costs, for

instance, the study conducted in Arizona in 2007 estimated that educating the IIRs costs the state

more than billion annually. However, some critics have suggested that such analyses do not

capture the net endowments immigrants bring to the economy in the long-run, such as future

taxes which educated children of immigrants might pay. Some people also feel that the idea of

spending more money on immigrant children’s education hampers native-born children if funds

are taken from their institution. According to the provided paper, on average, immigrants have a

lower rate of services’ utilization in comparison with native-born citizens, as undocumented

individuals, who are minorities, are afraid of deportation. But, utilization grows with time, the

longer that an immigrant resides in a country, cultural differences and bureaucratic procedures

are crossed. Moreover, care for the uninsured immigrant can be costly and ends up being treated

through the emergency department at a very high cost which is then recovered from other insured

patients through cost escalation. This practice has been estimated to cost over billion in

uncompensated care in the country. While some economists have opined that concentration on

the additional public expenditure is misleading because both the skilled and the unskilled

P a g e | 17

immigrant labor increases the tax base that in turn enhances the revenues. They also occupy

important positions in health and teaching sectors which have shortage, thus supporting public

services of both indigenous and immigrant populations. Thus, despite the difficulty of measuring

precise effects, most researchers concur that immigration does place pressure on public education

and healthcare funding to some extent, yet it is argued that these fiscal costs should be balanced

against the overall value of the contribution immigrants make to their host countries in the longer

term.

f. Fiscal federalism and burden distribution across government levels

The costs and benefits of immigration, be it the skilled or unskilled Immigrants are not shared in

the same manner at the different tiers of the government. To comprehend these fiscal effects

under fiscal federalism, it is necessary to examine how taxes, expenditures and burdens are

distributed in a federation. Usually, national or federal governments have better progressive

taxation tools to deal with general budget balances while state and local expenditures come under

direct impacts of immigration. For instance, the cost-benefit analysis of unskilled immigration

may lead to negative net fiscal effect on state and municipal governments due to increased costs

of education, health care, and income transfer relative to tax receipts. However, federal budgets

offsets these through progressive income taxes on higher wages earned by skilled immigrants.

Such a situation results in vertical fiscal externalities since the change in revenue and spending

impacts may not match. Due to different sharing of costs and benefits between national, state,

and local governments, there have been conflicts mainly between the national and subnational

governments over immigration policy reforms especially in countries that subnational

governments are major providers of tax-funded services. To balance national interests in

increasing Gross Domestic Product by promoting free immigration policies and the fiscal

P a g e | 18

concerns of state/local governments that experience disproportionate fiscal burdens, there must

be proper federal transfers and burden-sharing modalities. Such vertical disparities are spanned

by the aforementioned fiscal transfer tools and intergovernmental grant systems but at the same

time, they may raise the problem of transfer dependency. Instead, some of the taxation powers

could be decentralized to deal with the vertical pressures at the cost of overall progressivity.

Apparently, these problems also reflect the concerns of fiscal federalism concerning spillovers,

which has emerged due to the absence of the synchronization of immigration policy between the

federal government and provinces. Finally, when considering the economic effects of

immigration, it is necessary to evaluate not only the overall immigration’s effects on the national

fiscal balance sheet, but also consider the effects on different levels of government because the

costs and benefits are rarely evenly spread. This unevenness stems from the fact that revenues

collected and services provided are disparate at the national, state, and local levels.

3. INNOVATION, PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Innovation is positively related to productivity and economic growth but the role of immigration

policy in advanced economies is still an issue of debate. The nations strive to enhance innovation

and productivity for the purposes of enhancing the economic progress. Nonetheless, aging

demographics coupled with mismatching skills render several developed countries short of

manpower and partially dependent on immigration. The level of skill of those immigrants

significantly determines the degree of their impact. The first group of immigrants provide an

immediate contribution to innovation through the participation in business venture and

specialized skills in STEM occupations. There is evidence that about a quarter of high-tech start-

ups in the US had at least one immigrant entrepreneur, contributing to new job creation and

revenues. Professionals also supply complementary labor as they perform tasks that might not be

P a g e | 19

achieved otherwise and enable firms to increase production. This increases efficiency overall in

the economy as a whole, thus enhancing productivity. Furthermore, it is worth noting that, the

diversity of the experience and ideas that skilled immigrants possess contributes to higher levels

of creativity, knowledge transfer, innovation, and technological acquisition. All of this leads to

increased economic development in terms of higher GDP per capita and improved living

conditions. On the other hand, it reduces productivity by crowding out domestic low skilled

workers and decreasing capital intensity. If firms use more labor than capital to leverage on low

wages, it may harm investment appeals. Nonetheless, low-skilled immigrants also take up

employment and participate in care services, avoiding shortages that would limit advancement.

They also use the money earned to increase local purchasing. Balancing these effects is not easy,

however, the literature shows that both skilled and low skilled immigration, from a long-run

growth perspective, offers net economic gains to the advanced country through positive

innovation, productivity and growth externalities that improve incomes of domestic population.

a. High-skilled immigration and knowledge spillovers

The positive effect of the high-skilled immigrants especially those from STEM disciplines has

been associated with the knowledge spillovers in the host countries. Since these immigrants are

employed in research, academic, and other hi-tech sectors, they are endowed with superior

technical information from their home countries. Working with local professionals and

individuals, they ensure the exchange of knowledge to enhance the development process of new

ideas leading to innovations. It has been ascertained that the impact of foreign STEM workers at

the regional level is positively associated with an overall total factor productivity: skilled

immigrants contribute to innovation within the organization as well as increase total factor

productivity through diffusion effects on peer employees. Such skilled immigrants enhance the

P a g e | 20

knowledge capital, and the emergent knowledge products and services diffuse into the economy

through mechanisms such as patents, licensing, new ventures, and mobility of employees. The

end result is higher productivity and faster economic growth, positively impacting the economy.

While low skilled immigrants augment the number of workers, high skilled immigrants in

innovation-oriented occupations contribute a lot more to productivity because new innovations in

biotechnology, software, sophisticated manufacturing tools and devices, and medical technology

have significant multiplier effects on productivity in many downstream industries. Consequently,

countries race to capture and nurture foreign talent in the premier innovation sectors by

providing solutions such as prioritized visas and favorable tax regimes. Subsequently, advanced

economies with high skills and human capital inflows experience relatively higher GDP per

capita growth over time. Therefore, the high economic returns high-skilled immigrants yield

justifies the need to allow this talent through freer immigration policies, while the low

productivity returns from low-skilled immigrants do not offer the same cost/benefit ratio for

allowing unskilled immigration. In the long-run, countries have to conduct immigration policies

in sync with their economic development strategies, using skilled foreigners as innovation and

ideas conduits while regulating flows of less skilled immigrants depending on industrial needs.

b. Entrepreneurship rates among immigrant groups

Some studies that have sought to establish the link between immigration and entrepreneurship

pertain to many host countries. Research has indicated that the groups of immigrants with skills

have higher tendencies to open new ventures than the unskilled immigrant groups or even the

native citizens. In fact, it has been noted that on average, across the host countries, 30% of the

venture-backed companies have at least one immigrant founder. The motives for the immigrants

to become involved in business are diverse but are likely to relate to the conditions and

P a g e | 21

qualifications of the emigration waves. For instance, those people who have a degree in

engineering and have a problem entering large companies can create technology start-ups based

on their experience.

The middle-skilled immigrants also incorporate entrepreneurship at relatively elevated rates,

particularly those groups with high inter-ethnic social capital to access funding and labor through

ethnic contacts. It is also important to mention that some refugee groups have very high

entrepreneurial activity rates due to lack of other sources of income. In sum, these types of

entrepreneurial activities can generate substantial employment impact as well as innovation and

efficiency enhancement in the advanced host countries. As new start-ups oriented toward state-

of-the-art technologies, access to export markets, as well as development of high value-added

services, immigrant entrepreneurship can act as a conduit for technology transfer, quicker

technology diffusion and, ultimately, faster economic growth. Governments should therefore opt

for policies that reduce restrictions and offer efficient assistance to immigrants at various skill

levels of entrepreneurship. Support structures such as mentorship programs, incubators, micro-

finance loans, and visa regimes that promote immigrant businesses could enhance the positive

impact of immigration to technological advancement, efficiency improvements and employment

throughout the economy as a whole.

c. Patent production and R&D contributions

STEM human capital has been shown to be a source of significant innovation and productivity

growth for immigrant-receiving countries through extra R&D expenditure and enhanced patent

output. Contrary to the common perception that immigrants are a burden to the economy,

researches based on the analysis of the patent have revealed that scientists and engineers in the

immigration are much more productive than their native counterparts in the countries such as the

P a g e | 22

US; the statistics shows that the immigrant scientists and engineers have contributed to more

than a quarter of all patents filed by the lead inventors. The results indicating that a higher rate of

quality patents is associated with higher immigration of skilled technical workers imply that the

latter directly spur innovations in their resident fields by diffusing knowledge and extending

innovation networks. A large number of highly qualified specialists, for instance, computer

scientists or biomedical engineers, provide new and valuable competencies to domestic

workplaces. Their integration means increased R & D as it involves the application of skills in

collaboration for effective and efficient solution finding on complex technical issues. Improving

a country’s intellectual capital resource enhances expertise growth in the long run. Thus, the

countries that attract a large number of immigrants to the NIH-funded biotechnology sectors, for

instance, exhibit significantly greater citation impact of articles as the skilled migrants integrate

local clusters with global knowledge. Venture capital investments that are targeted towards

regions with increases in skilled technical labor also reveal higher ratios of patent applications

per investment, signifying increased research output. In fact, skilled immigration brings double-

barreled first-generation and second-generation effects by providing initial innovations and then

spreading new technologies, methods and techniques into its operational uses in commerce that

are likely to circulate through trade or public usage. This implies that host countries which use

policy to attract global high-skilled talent can enhance domestic productivity as well as foster

dynamic advancement of R & D capacities, patentable inventions and possibly marketable IP

assets in various sectors. And, in turn, these mechanisms affect direct increase in the long-term

gross domestic product thus contributing to the long-run economic growth.

P a g e | 23

d. Productivity effects in different economic sectors

The productivity effects of innovation affect various sectors of the economy in distinct ways. In

the agricultural sector, such things as biotechnology seeds, modern practices, and technology in

farming, and agricultural machinery can improve yields and productivity per farmer. However,

these advancements could also lead to increased concentration by large corporate farm and thus

decrease employment opportunities for low skilled farm employees. In manufacturing,

automation and process innovations increases labor productivity but makes many routine

production jobs redundant. But at the same time, it generates economic effects in the form of job

opportunities that require higher skill levels such as engineering, programming, and robotics

maintenance. In services, the information technology innovations are the source of huge gains in

productivity – for example, the intangible service outputs such as financial products, online

platform services etc., can be produced with little increase in labor. But lower skilled services

jobs in retail, food and beverages and transportation industries are more vulnerable to

displacement by technology. Immigration policy exists in this context and as the stock of both

high and low skilled immigrants affects some sectors in the host country more than others. High

skilled immigrant’s tendency to settle in sectors that are innovation intensive such as technology,

healthcare and financials can lead to productivity increase via human capital deepening, higher

entrepreneurship rates, innovation, and exports to home countries. The immigrant workers are

most likely to take up positions in the agriculture, construction, hospitality and other areas with

labor intensity, where they perform indispensable work but also could have lower marginal

product of labor. Measures such as the availability of visas, restrictions in employment

agreements, investment promotions and grants determine how immigration impacts productivity

in various sectors. Finally, the productivity effects of innovation and immigration are reflected by

various and nuanced economic effects and distributions by skills and industry.

P a g e | 24

e. Brain gain vs. brain drain dynamics

Newcomers coming to the host countries with high educational standards referred to as “brain

gain” are likely to promote innovation, productivity, and economic development. Highly

qualified immigrants can help to alleviate labor market gaps in STEM fields and act as

knowledge brokers and technology adopters. For instance, more than half of the startups in the

tech industry in Silicon Valley from 1995 to 2005 were started by immigrant entrepreneurs. Here,

the increase in human capital with improved training helps in innovation through positive

externality such as skilled employee contact and employee mobility. This then leads to enhanced

firm and economy wide productivity in the long run by either successive improvements in

existing processes or through the introduction of new radical products for the commercial

market. The empirical analysis of historical data on US patenting exhibit that 1 percentage point

increase in the population share of immigrant college graduates led to the increase in the patents

per capita by 9-18%. Skilled immigration also stimulates demand for final consumption and

investment, which offers macroeconomic impacts. However, concerns have been raised that there

is what is known as ‘brain drain’ as the talented human capital the struggling countries need for

its development migrates to other progressive countries. More than half of the adults with tertiary

education from the Caribbean, Central America, and some African countries have migrated.

These outflows may require tax or other incentives to avoid being permanent. Hence, efforts to

develop well-coordinated immigration policies that will focus on selective and high value skills

which are scarce becomes important. Maintaining visa portability, possible transition to a

permanent residence status, and family reunification leaves immigrants in the country and

reduces churn from return migration. In conclusion, opening up opportunities for cyclical

mobility between the origin and the destination countries ensures ‘brain circulation’ which

reduces brain drain while promoting international worker networks.

P a g e | 25

f. Long-run economic growth models with immigration

Immigration in long-run growth models emphasize interaction between the level and

composition of immigration, wage differences, productivity, and rates of technology adoption

and diffusion in host countries Early theories pointed to decreasing returns to capital

accumulation as a major factor that set limits to growth, while newer theories by Romer, Lucas

and others indicate that long-run growth might be driven by innovation and knowledge spillovers

that enhance productivity. These models highlight human capital as a source of ideas, R & D and

technology that can counterbalance declining marginal productivity of capital outlays. In the

Romer model, sustained growth is brought about by endogenous innovation derived from

redundancy and competition, with the diffusion of public knowledge promoting positive

externalities. In this regard, the flexible immigration policies can help to sustain long-run

economic growth due to the attractiveness of highly skilled persons such as STEM workers,

scientists or engineers.

Immigrants also directly facilitate knowledge transfers, as is exemplified by the historical and

contemporary cycles of migration waves encoding the exchange of innovation, science, and

culture between interconnected world cities. Hunt proves that this is true even in the economies

that are close to the technological frontier. Similarly, when examining the occupation profile of

the foreign tech workers, Ottaviano and Peri observe that innovative industries dominate in the

United States. Obtaining new technologies and processes through immigration thus improves the

absorptive capacity for frontier research. Additionally, in Romer styled models of endogenous

growth, immigrants’ diversity increases the overall stock of knowledge available for use in

recombinant invention. According to Caicedo, this kind of complementary is helpful in

understanding the high patenting rates among immigrants in the United States. Recent theories

P a g e | 26

also highlight the wage differences and the segmentation effects essential for initiating

technological change while discussing the long-run growth patterns. "

4. SECTORAL AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS

Therefore, the effects of immigration on the economy of the receiving country may be positive or

negative, depending on the level of education and skills of the immigrants, as well as the sector

and region of destination. Low skilled immigrants go for jobs that are physically demanding like

farming, construction, or working in hotels or as domestic helps that do not demand skills or

formal education to be acquired. Increased numbers of low skilled immigrants in these sectors

may reduce wages and working conditions, creating discontent among the native-born

population. However, by being able to access a larger supply of cheap labor, businesses and

farms, for instance, may well be able to boost sectoral production and growth. In particular,

migrant seasonal farmworkers have become critical to the agriculture industry, whereby many

fruits and vegetables cannot be harvested and processed effectively without their labor. It must

also be noted that negative impact outweighs positive impact in some localities but not in others.

Thus, some gateway regions that have experienced historically higher level of immigration such

as border towns and large cities may face increased competition for low-wage jobs, while other

regions that are facing labor shortage may welcome the new stream of workers to help fill

vacancies. However, the ill-equipped migrant ends up at the lower end of the socioeconomic

order irrespective of the country they move to, problems such as overcrowded housing, limited

access to health services and poverty result in negative social impacts. This is especially the case

with managerial, technical and professional positions that require post-secondary education or

long training, where skilled migrants are not likely to displace native workers. It generally leads

to higher productivity, increased innovation and knowledge transfer – which are particularly

P a g e | 27

helpful for high technology and sectors that rely heavily on knowledge. This is done by the

intervention of medical practitioners, engineers, professors, business people – they spark changes

that foster growth of economy. Given that skilled migrants have higher income, their

consumption, taxes and investments give rise to even more virtuous macroeconomic impacts.

More importantly, however, these effects are centralized in advanced economies, which are

congregating in cities at the cost of deepening peripheries’ vulnerability in towns and rural areas.

Perhaps a more focused approach to regional visa systems can ensure that highly skilled migrants

and their positive ramifications are spread throughout a country. Nevertheless, both sending and

receiving states would significantly benefit should they collectively promote and facilitate the

legal, safe, temporary mobility of workers across the skill spectrum.

a. Effects on specific industries (e.g., tech, healthcare, agriculture)

The following effects of immigration are therefore evident, whether it is skilled or unskilled. For

example, research has revealed that the highly educated immigrant in the science, technology,

health, and engineering disciplines has benefited the host country through entrepreneurial

activities and employment opportunities within the knowledge-intensive economy. More than

half of the startups in Silicon Valley are started by an immigrant. A number of these startups

contribute a significant amount of economic value and provide employment. This high rate of

immigrant entrepreneurship is often explained by the quality of university programs that have

produced talented individuals, as well as policies that allow immigrants to work in the United

States such as the H-1B visa for gifted workers. On the other hand, the majority of the unskilled

immigrate for the purpose of seeking low wage employment opportunities such as in agriculture,

construction, hospitality, food services, domestic helpers, and landscaping. As to wages, they are

not always positive and quite debatable in some of these sectors, but these facilities help provide

P a g e | 28

lower prices and business development. For instance, the existence of cheap immigrant labor

benefits the American farmer, who regards access to labor as a major problem. Analysis of

various estimates indicates that expelling the undocumented farm workers would lead to

significant reduction in agricultural productivity. As for healthcare, the polls show that

immigrants are overrepresented in some professions, such as nursing aides or medical assistants,

thus filling gaps in demand. However, it is unclear that this is the case for native-born healthcare

workers because increased diversity within the healthcare workforce has positive effects:

minority patients benefit from greater cultural sensitivity. Thus, despite the variations between

industries, the results suggest that effective immigration leads to improved innovation and

growth, primarily in the technology and especially in the health sectors while the presence of

large pools of low-skilled immigrant labor, makes industries more competitive in highly physical

labor demanding sectors. Other specific studies and policy changes may further encourage

optimization of immigration’s impact for economic sectors.

b. Regional concentration of immigrants and economic outcomes

It is a well-known fact that immigration is not spread throughout the host countries but is focused

in certain geographical regions and cities. Immigrant impacts the economy a lot, and regions and

cities with high immigrant shares record tremendous changes. First, immigration leads to an

increase in the number of workers in the local labor market to be hired by employers. It can

stimulate investment and employment generation if complementary to increased demand for

labor. Nevertheless, this leads to problems with immigrants’ arrival, as it can harm native low-

skilled workers of the region who are in direct competition with the immigration. A study

demonstrates that it has short-term adverse effects on native employee’s wages and employment

status. However, an increase in the availability of labor provides benefits to employers and

P a g e | 29

consumers through reduced costs of production and prices. Immigrants with high skills bring

even higher regional returns through their innovations, new ventures, and positive externalities

for native skilled employees. High-skilled immigrant patents at higher rates and are more likely

to set up new businesses and generate employment. It helps the native professionals get

knowledge transfer and the upgrade of skills through interaction with people from other

organizations. Thus, the overall impact of immigration on regional economies in the long run

depends on the composition and concentration of migrants. Immigrants with low skills tend to

reside in certain cities and regions due to social networks, cheaper housing, and jobs that do not

demand language or education. This concentration also exaggerates the adverse impact on native

low-skilled workers in terms of wages and employment. High-skilled immigrants tend to be even

more spread out within robust regional economies. These positive impacts of technology

innovation and productivity counterbalance the negative impacts and offer favorable

externalities. Policy responses have to deal with equity considerations regarding concentrated

effects with efficiency effects in the high-skilled immigration. Measures such as offering

vocational education and training to the affected low-skilled natives through workforce training

programs can help ease short-term disruptions in the labor market. All in all, the regional

distribution of immigrants affects their economic performance in relation to the local labor

market employment opportunities regardless of the skill levels of the particular immigrants.

Addressing those outcomes requires complex policy interventions that depend on the distribution

of skills across areas.

c. Housing market impacts and urban development

High and low-skilled immigrants affect local housing supply and urban growth especially in the

immigrant destination cities. Since Immigrants are likely to live in neighborhoods where their

P a g e | 30

language, culture, and social networks are similar, their accommodation needs alter some

neighborhoods. It leads to construction activities to address housing deficits thus changing the

physical city environment. While the tested hypotheses indicate that there are differences in

housing patterns between the skilled and unskilled immigrants it is evident that the impacts on

the housing markets are diverse and have both positive and negative outcomes.

On one hand, low-skilled immigrants tend to live in substandard, low-cost housing or in crowded

houses because wages restrict them. Their housing consumption is significantly different from

the high-end skilled immigrants who encourage the construction of luxurious apartments and

houses. While the former supports housing construction and increases its value, the latter leads to

increased prices and gentrification, affecting minorities. On the other hand, substandard

neighborhoods may be reclaimed by the immigrants who will go and settle in those areas and

start businesses. Urban theorists argue that while immigrant groups’ housing experiences are

influenced by human capital, they are also affected by supply-side factors including the ease of

housing supply and the extent to which the housing market discriminates against certain ethnic

groups based on their settlement area and ethnic density.

In addition to housing markets, immigration shapes urban form and planning concerns in several

ways across geographic areas. Although gateway counties that have a history of newcomer

settlement have been able to address their needs when providing services, investments and

zoning, sudden waves of immigration can put pressure on the fiscus and land use. The attainment

of these goals may need strategic planning and sustained cooperation on the issues to do with

extension of transport infrastructure, allowance of population densities in residential areas, and

social facilities to encourage equal integration and economic mobility irrespective of the skill

levels. If cities do not respond to other potential barriers related to the concentration of unskilled

P a g e | 31

immigrants, or react to demographic changes with policies of exclusion, they are likely to

amplify spatial inequalities that are already seen in studies of class and race segregation.

Immigration complements internal migration and domestic demography to transform housing

outcomes and urban fabric in ways that may lead to affordability pressures or infrastructural

deficits in some instances and rejuvenation of disinvested areas in others. In this respect, it is

critical to assess regional differences instead of focusing on the implementation of the universal

strategies and measures. Additional studies are needed to understand the specific housing

demands of different skill-level immigrant subgroups, and to develop effective strategies for

connecting them with education, employment, and social services, so that they can benefit from

local agglomeration.

d. Consumer demand patterns and market expansion

The immigration of both high and low qualified immigrants affects consumers and their

spending power in host countries, creating market opportunities in several sectors. With high or

low skilled immigration, as the population increases their fundamental needs must be met

through production, food, clothing, household items, transportation and shelter. This helps

increase demand across consumer staple industries. Further, immigrants have their own select

consumer requirements related to ethnic food, spices, restaurants, places of worship, native

language books/media etc. This leads to new trade niches being created. However, the amount of

market expansion that occurs varies according to the skill level of the immigrants. High-skilled

immigrants have higher propensity to income, social capital, education and lower propensity to

unemployment. This segment has more disposable income, which they can spend on both staple

and more expensive higher-value products and services. With their consumption patterns they

create new markets, products and employment opportunities to meet their changing preferences

P a g e | 32

and increased purchasing power. On the other hand, low skilled immigrants, consumption is

more inclined towards the essential goods and services than the luxury products since they earn

less and remit part of their income to their home countries. Nevertheless, their combined demand

drives consumption in informal ethnic local economies, small neighborhood stores, and basic

services that cater to the lower end of the host country market through low-price products. They

also participate in extending the gig economy by engaging in activities such as food delivery,

ride hailing, domestic work etc. They also have a differential effect in the identified markets

depending on their country of origin and cultural inclinations. Thus, both high and low skilled

immigration leads to shift in consumption of foreign goods and the enlargement of the market, in

the best interest of the pull country depending on the bargaining power and social demands of

each segment. The intensity, characteristics and rate of growth may vary for the two skill levels

but they both need domestic manufacturing and new market opportunities to meet the

increasingly complex and diverse consumer demands.

e. International trade facilitation through diaspora networks

Immigrant diaspora networks can help promote cross-border trade through the elimination of

transaction costs and information gaps between the home and host countries. Newly arrived

migrants possess their skills and networks in business, social and political realms, using ethnic

connections to foster trade and investment relations between their home and host countries. For

instance, Chinese and Indian, professional migrant networks in North America facilitated transfer

of technical and market information back to home countries to enhance export capability

especially in new products such as information technology. In addition to providing capital as

well as technological and managerial expertise, immigrant diasporas enhance the trading

infrastructure by creating cross-border trading networks, sourcing and recommendation services,

P a g e | 33

and distribution facilities including ethnic shopping centers for the purpose of importing and

exporting merchandise. These networks replace conventional institutions that facilitate market

coordination, enabling multi-party trade transactions through the community’s trusted referrals.

Diaspora intermediation consequently fosters export development, removes obstacles to North-

South commerce, and links developing country enterprises to GVCs. Nonetheless, the types of

skills that the migrant bring forward define the range of diaspora trade promotion. In the case of

source countries with predominantly low skill emigration, the use of remittances increases

consumption relative to investment and productivity improvements required for exploiting

international trade opportunities. On the other hand, skilled diasporas transfer valuable

knowledge, contacts and technology that are essential in diversification and upgrading export

sectors back in home countries. Thus, depending on the quality of education attained by the

migrants, diaspora intermediation either brings together or widens the gap in the global economy.

f. Remittance flows and origin country effects

Immigration remittances by immigrants to families and communities in the country of origin is

another crucial source of externality funding. In the case of Latin American countries, the

analyses of remittances sent from U. S. indicate that most of the remittances are used to fund

consumption than investment expenditure in the origin communities; to buy food, clothe and pay

utility bills than undertaking investment in businesses or infrastructure. But some of the studies

point to a multiplier impact where each dollar that is remitted goes round to stimulate other

activity. However, the economic stimulus appears small especially as money trickle slowly

through household expenditure. Other wide-ranging origin country impacts emerge as

remittances affect work organization and human capital accumulation. Some of the cross-

sectional survey data suggest declines in labor force attachment in some sending countries and

P a g e | 34

changing patterns of employment from farm-based agriculture to service sector jobs or own

account enterprises in the rural receiving zones of remittances. Other educations effects are also

observed; the household remittances provide the children with more years in school than if they

are forced to earn for the family income. Although beneficial for persons, lower production and

higher demand may have adverse effects on specific sectors of origin country economics.

Concerns arise on the impact of slow migration or change of permanent base by migrant families

on long run results from their origin places. It also affects critical sectors like health and

education due to the loss of skilled professionals within émigré flows. While receiving

remittances enable the beneficiary households to improve their consumption level and

investment in human capital, empirical studies on the long-run positive effects for regional

/sectoral development in the origin countries are scarce. The host countries stand to gain

immediate positive externalities from individual immigrants’ skill and work; however, the host

countries have only stakeholder interest in the remittances back to the home country families and

communities except where these remittances affect the future flow of immigrants. Monitoring the

use of remittance, synchronizing international policies, and analyzing relation with immigration

aspects can help in developing a clear picture of the economic consequences of migration across

the affected economy.

5. POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Concerning the effects of immigration on the economies of the countries of destination, it is

important to acknowledge that they have numerous policy implications. From a fiscal point of

view, while skilled immigrants are likely to have a higher income; they contribute more in taxes

and reduce budget deficits, unskilled immigrants use more of the social services. However, the

net fiscal effect is a function of age, family size and utilization of services by immigrants. A

P a g e | 35

cross-country comparison reveals that while nations like Canada and Australia with points-based

system that select the highly skilled are more beneficial to the country than the less skilled guest

workers like in Germany. Another element that determines the economic effects is the

relationships between the complementarity and substitutability of immigrants and natives at the

workplace. Low-skilled immigration also may have impacts of lowering wages or employment

for domestic low-skilled workers, including the youth, thus worsening the inequality. This paper

reveals that skilled migration increases productivity while causing little disruption to the labor

market. The experience with respect to wages shows that while overall wage effects have been

modest according to cross-country studies, unskilled immigration has been found to have led to

increased wage dispersion in the United States and United Kingdom in the 1990s. Immigrants

also influence the housing markets, public services, innovation and growth. As for the fiscal and

the effects on the labor market they are still the subject of discussion while there is a tendency

among the economy to realize that both skilled and unskilled immigration are, in general,

beneficial overall.

These diverse distributional effects and other social welfare considerations are balanced in policy

discussions. It is important to note that Canadian public is in general supportive of immigration

especially for skilled immigrants while opinion on unskilled immigrants is more divided.

Measures like point systems, LM tests, WFTs, or faster recognition procedures could prevent

negative effects on sensitive populations. The other factors include the policies of settlement and

integration. Consequently, due to demographic changes, most developed countries are increasing

the goals for skilled immigration. But they also acknowledge the continued need for unskilled

labor in the future. Temporary worker programs are more liberal to provide for the changes in the

labor market needs. While countries are in a struggle to attract international talent, policy

P a g e | 36

analysis shows that there are choices between exclusivity and access. Studies indicate that

moderate or intermediate policy interventions might be the most effective. Nevertheless, both

skilled and unskilled immigration involve a lot of policy issues that do not have clear answers.

Hence, sophisticated, evidence-based strategies that acknowledge the inherent tradeoffs are still

relevant.

a. Point-based vs. employer-driven selection systems

Currently, most countries employ a point-based system or an employer-led system to choose

economic immigrants. In a point-based system, applicants are ranked on the basis of education,

skills, language proficiency and other human capital characteristics. Canada and Australia

employ variations of this system, where they admit immigrants possessing traits that would serve

the labor market useful despite the absence of a prearranged employment offer. Research also

indicates that both nations have gained economically through their skilled immigration system.

On the other hand, in an employer sponsored system, employers specify the specific employees

with the required skills they require and governments assist in their entry, as was the case with

the United States policy before 1965. Studies indicate that this procedure ensures that immigrants

have improved economic returns since they join the workforce straight.

From the policy perspective, the point-based selectivity systems provide governments with great

levers to influence the nature of immigration stock and its distribution to fit the domestic context

for consumption. But they need a lot of bureaucracy for the constant assessment of the quality.

Such policies are more market-oriented but the employer initiatives and thus entail less certainty

on average skills of immigrants. Economic theory may propose that the current system benefits

people since it ensures that human capital is efficiently allocated in the market. Though it is

possible that certain information gaps or discrimination may lead to market failures compared to

P a g e | 37

a rationally designed points system. The choice possibly is the best of both worlds as a policy.

For example, the US and Canada have talks on how they could import some features of the other

country’s model to improve the fulfilment of economic policy goals on the quantity of

immigration of highly qualified workers.

b. Temporary worker programs and circular migration

Circular migration temporary worker programs are useful instruments for the successful

implementation of migration policy and management in the host countries, as these programs

help to achieve the economic objectives of the countries while maintaining political and social

stability. Thus, making it possible for workers to come in for some time and certain industries

that are deficient in workers, the nation’s get the needed skills and labor without the pressures of

permanent residence. As the following data also suggest, well-designed temporary worker

schemes offer outlets for unemployment or underemployment in migrant-sending countries and

foster skill acquisition. Nevertheless, not every TWP is accomplished as planned in the

beginning. Both the design of the program, the efficiency of its implementation, as well as the

ability to react to changes in the economic climate contributes to the achievement of the set goals

regarding the program’s outcomes.

Among all the temporary worker programs, Canada’s Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program is

one that mostly meets policy objectives of the receiving and sending countries. Agricultural

employees are allowed to enter Canada for as long as 8 months within a year to plant, cultivate

and harvest crops such as fruits and vegetables. They offer decent accommodation and

remuneration not below that of the Canadian workers. Participants are allowed to come back in

the following years, thus making circular migration which helps solve the problem of shortage of

workers in the Canada agricultural sector while at the same time offering jobs to migrants’ home

P a g e | 38

countries. Yet, even typical successful policies such as those of Canada attract criticism. Critics

suggest that temporary worker status exposes the migrants to abuse or poor working conditions.

However, Canada’s program continues to exist and be relevant as migration policies change.

Coalesced and paradoxical outcomes differentiate the H-2 visa programs in the United States for

the temporary agricultural workforce and other low-skilled occupations. Originally designed to

respond to domestic labor shortages, the H-2 programs are hampered by bureaucracy, weak

oversight, and rigidity. The program caps are often set aside from the actual real-time

requirements of the industry, and the workers have come to rely on repeating the program year

after year, which is antithetical to the temporary nature of the experience. There is always a lack

of progress when it comes to reforming the system. But ignoring real business requirements that

give rise to demand for labor gives rise to risks like proliferation of illegal immigration. In sum,

the US approach provides useful lessons on how not to organize adequate temporary worker

programs.

Temporary migrant worker programs have great positive implications, but their application

should be carried out with the consideration of economic and social values of different countries

stakeholders. Canada’s seasonal agricultural worker program has been ongoing for many years

and can be considered reasonably successful. However, changes in local circumstances coupled

with forces of the global market dictate periodic assessment and adjustments of any short-term

labor migration policy.

c. High-skilled visa policies (e.g., H-1B in the US)

Temporary employment programs such as the H-1B in the United States are intended to bring

highly skilled workers in fields like science, engineering, and computer programming. There is

P a g e | 39

evidence that these workers sometimes cover shortages in the domestic labor market and

contribute human capital that might stimulate innovation, self-employment and positive

externalities for the natives. However, high-skilled visa policies are still a subject of discussions

and debates on whether they lead to the actual economic impacts as intended.

There is a need to consider specifics of immigration systems, demand-supply dynamics in the

high-skilled immigration countries, and other aspects influencing the outcomes of the

comparison between the countries. For instance, Canada and Australia employ point-based

systems that prioritize skills particularly skilled workers to meet economic objectives such as

increase in production. In contrast, the H-1B is an employer-sponsored system that has a rigid

regulatory framework that includes wage floors, limited visa availability, and criteria aimed at

safeguarding American employees. Presumably, such differences condition or moderate impacts

on policy structures like these.

Research on high-skilled visa economic impact is still inconclusive, implying that its impacts

may greatly vary based on context. Research has pointed out to positive effects on general

innovation and productivity rates in the United States, particularly in industries that rely heavily

on H-1B visas such as STEM professions. While some others argue that they have negative

impacts on domestic wages and employment in certain sectors. Still many questions are left

unanswered concerning distributional consequences between native employees, customers and

shareholders of companies. Even more comparative country-level analysis could help to

elucidate when and where high-skilled immigration has unambiguously positive or negative

impact on the economy.

All in all, high-skilled immigration policy is thus a matter of balancing between multiple

economic gains and loss and multiple political gains and loss. Such visa programs as the H-1B

P a g e | 40

are designed to bring talent from around the world to help the nation build its economy, but face

push and pull factors like domestic labor advocacy and outsourcing issues. Finding this

important balance still remains a delicate process. Comparing countries allows to reveal

successes, failures and questions that need to be answered during reforming. It will therefore be

important to conduct further economic analysis alongside the political discourse for the

formulation of competent immigration policies that will help address the needs of all the

concerned groups.

d. Integration policies and their economic effects

The following are some of the integration policies that host countries use to assimilate the

immigrants into the social, economic, and cultural structures of the receiving society. These

policies affect core sectors like language development, vocational training, education, housing,

health, and others. It is possible to acknowledge both the economic benefits of, and the economic

reasons against, extensive integration attempts. Advocates argue that integration policies enable

the immigrants to fully optimize their abilities and skills, to engage in better quality and higher

paying labor market, and gain promotions to better job positions, innovation and business, and

paying more taxes. For instance, governments sponsor language classes that enhance the ability

of immigrants to speak and find employment. However, critics offer criticisms that assert that

liberal integration policies encourage high migration rates, reliance on social assistance, and

utilization of public services to the detriment of the taxpayers. Maintaining a balance is therefore

important as countries aim at reaping as much on the economic aspects of immigration while at

the same time not overstretching the fiscus. Another factor is the degree to which governments

are inclined to assimilation or multiculturalism. Specific and payoff-oriented approaches to

integrate policies show that they are more effective in generating better fiscal impacts for the

P a g e | 41

immigrants and the recipient state. Professionally trained individuals with demand on their

expertise do not need much attention to be given to them since they integrate faster. On the other

hand, there may be a need to channel more funding to basic education, vocational training and

social assistance programs PIA proponents argue that integration policies enable the immigrants

to apply their skills more efficiently in higher skills job markets, be promoted, innovators, and

create employment and pay more taxes. For instance, the authorities may support language

courses to enhance the employability and interaction of the immigrants. However, critics assert

that overly accommodating integration policies lead to higher migration rates and reliance on

social benefits, coupled with expensive access to public services for citizens. immigrants to

enhance labor market access, livelihood, and efficiency of spending the taxpayers’ money.

Substantive implementation of such policies still poses some challenges due to variance in needs

and motives among migrants. Nevertheless, peer countries with well-developed immigration

policies such as Canada and Australia have been able to improve the immigrant economic

outcomes through suitable policy portfolios. Immigrants’ integration entails hard practical,

political, and ethical choices but the findings demonstrate that these decisions have implications

for fiscal and budget outcomes.

e. International competition for talent and its consequences

The global scramble for human capital has however intensified in the last few decades with

many developed countries putting in place policies that facilitate attraction and retention of

highly skilled immigrants particularly in STEM disciplines. This ‘brain drain’ migration flow

from ‘developing’ to ‘developed ‘states have several economic implications for both origin and

destination countries that are worth comparing from a comparative public policy perspective.

P a g e | 42

For host advanced economies, human capital in the innovative sectors can be more of an inflow

which enhances productivity and growth. The skilled visa systems linked to occupations that are

in high demand such as the United States, Canada, and Australia have been employed to quickly

address domestic labor market imbalances as well as boost the advancement in technology. But

certain studies identify crowding out effects where immigrant scientists and engineers

outcompete native skilled workers, though to a negligible extent. Nevertheless, the overall

economy and wage improvements, as well as localization benefits of knowledge-intensive

industries appear to offer more benefits than costs.

On the other hand, for the developing countries which are facing skill flight, this means that their

most educated citizens are leaving hence worsening preexisting shortages of crucial professional

services such as health and education. It similarly erodes the levels of entrepreneurship, patents

and local training due to the exit of elite technical workers. Efforts to counteract this through

compulsory public service provisions or the repayment of state subsidies for education have been

relatively unproductive. However, factors that help to offset these losses include inflow of

remittances, diaspora networks, and possible circulation of skilled emigrants back home after

getting enhanced credentials in other countries.

When it comes to ethical considerations of these patterns, policy remedies are not simple and

there are no straightforward prescriptions. That while the reduction of the external recruitment

practices can help to slow down deficits, global mobility barriers reduce total knowledge

exchange. Rather human capital formation that sought to increase the domestic pool of skills in

combination with promoting return migration and knowledge transfer may provide more

sustainable solutions. As with all tradeoffs it must be stated that the distributional tradeoffs

P a g e | 43

cannot be ignored. As skilled migration is expected to increase further, more effective

comparison of political measures and their effects on the economy will be essential.

f. Future scenarios: automation, AI, and changing skill demands

With further development of automation and artificial intelligence in mind, there is some

controversy about its effects on jobs and wages. It is claimed that unlike previous technological

revolutions, robotics, machine learning, and AI risk putting many workers out of work. It may

considerably affect the immigration policy debate in most receiving countries. This means that if

automation significantly lessens the demand for low-wage workers while simultaneously

growing the need for highly skilled technical professionals, countries might change its

immigration policies to reflect this.

However, it is still unclear how many jobs are at risk of being lost to automation. Historical

evidence indicates that the workers transfer into new occupations after embracing the

technological change thus no long-term unemployment exists. Furthermore, automation can as

well lead to the generation of new jobs while at the same time displacing or modifying some of

the existing ones. If displacement effects are to be less than some predictions, then the policies

on immigration could still remain moderately framed. High and less high-skilled immigration

streams would remain an area where countries would experience trade-offs between one

economic and political consideration and a different one.

However, it may alter the need for various skills by influencing the type of skills that people

should possess. The more machines replace routine-manual and cognitive job tasks, the more

employers require employees with creative abilities, social, emotional skills, higher cognitive

skills, and technology skills. This could lead to higher demand for qualified immigrants who can

P a g e | 44

work in sectors such as Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Information Technology, and

Engineering. However, other jobs that require intermediate skills such as technicians or trade

workers who maintain the automated equipment used in industries may also experience an

increase in the demand for their services.

As a result, education and training must move away from traditional academic disciplines to

technical competencies which include computer literacy and ease of use of automated systems.

Education for a lifetime and consequent restructuring of education can become a trend. Some

countries that have effective education-workforce systems could possibly benefit more in the

development and use of innovative technologies. It could affect their immigration demand and

economic paths.

Therefore, it can be predicted that automation and AI will change the requirements concerning

skills, although, today’s forecasts differ when it comes to substitution. Immigration policies will

require further tuning of sustained demand for continued less high-skill labor compared to

increasing requirement for specialized technical workforce. The education and training reforms

that will assist domestic workforces’ transition will be as crucial. Therefore, as technologies

progress, it is crucial to offer and perform profound analysis and discussion that will lead to the

making of policies that will enhance benefits and diminish the adverse effects.

JHR 425 -ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF SKILLED VS. UNSKILLED IMMIGRATION ON HOST COUNTRIES

Students also viewed