Page 1 of 26
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT TRENDS AND DETERMINANTS
1.0 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Concept and Significance
1.1 Definition and different forms of FDI
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) forms one of the foundations of the global economic integration based on
the current work model because it leads to the commercial activities of foreign and domestic business
entities and the economic development (Pettinger, 2021). FDI can take a variety of forms, where greenfield
investments, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), and joint ventures are the key components among them
(Popovici & Călin, 2014). Greenfield investment is the point of entry into a foreign nation in which a
corporation starts up a new facility in that region or country or commits to develop all the infrastructure from
the very beginning (Pearce, 2019). Unlike the international expansion of businesses across borders,
mergers and acquisition transactions involve the acquisition of established host country businesses or
assets, thus imparting an immediate access to existing market footholds, customer bases and intellectual
property (Pettinger, 2021). Tie-ups and strategic alliances involve two different entities to form a stronger
business partnership to share expertise, resource, and opportunities to achieve the common business
objectives (Qi, 2007). Technology transfer contracts or co-producing are the forms of partnerships that take
place here, as well the standard objectives a manufacturer needs to achieve and the overall market
situation. Moreover, FDI works as an intermediary tool which helps knowledge outflow and technology
transition across borders making it possible for recipient countries to absorb foreign knowledge,
experience, and highly advanced technologies (Pearce, 2019). Through facilitating enterprises rivalry,
making productivity to be improved, and renourcing investment in research and development, FDI plays an
important part in the stable and competitive growth of host. economics (Qi, 2007). Interestingly, FDI the
same time performs an important function of global value chains when multinational corporations use their
Page 2 of 26
location/geography advantage to improve their production processes, reduce cost and access international
markets (Pettinger, 2021). Thus, global economy is interlinked (Popovici & Călin, 2014).
1.2 Importance for economic growth and development
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), as a significant factor of economic advancement and development,
impacts the economy via many ways such as investment inproductivity, employment generation and
knowledge dissemination across the borders (Reddy, 2015). FDI specifically will be of great value for the
economy of the host countries by way of raising productivity levels, boosting innovation, and generating
superior infrastructure and human capital (Popovici & Călin, 2014). For instance, FDI is one of the most
significant determinants in domestic industries that incorporate international value chains which become
bigger export markets and competition on a global scale (Pettinger, 2021). Nations that can draw FDI
(Foreign Direct Investment) are in the advantageous position to spell out poverty, industrialization, and
infrastructural growth with the help of foreign capital, expertise, and technology (Qi, 2007). Another factor is
the impact of FDI inflows on the multiplier effect which in turn strengthens the demand for goods and
services and provides a ground for the stronger local providers and the government tax revenue increase
(Pearce, 2019). FDI, being a major engine of economic growth and development at a global scale, and thus
generating a range of impacts for the host and home countries. In addition to raising the volume of
investment, these inflows also make the creation of the employment opportunities possible contributing to a
decrease in poverty and a shift in the growth pattern (Reddy, 2015). Thus, productivity and competitiveness
of the host country are improved (Popovici & Călin, 2014). Besides an FDI impact on infrastructure
development, host countries enjoy this from building roads, ports, telecommunications networks, and other
necessary infrastructure which in return have a positive economic contribution (Pettinger, 2021). Countries
by means of purposeful policies and programs for inflowing and using FDI will be able to create new fields
Page 3 of 26
for development they wouldn't have otherwise had and enhance sustainable economic development and
prosperity (Qi, 2007).
1.3 Distinguishing features from portfolio investment
Unlike portfolio investments which primarily have non-equity financial investment, foreign direct Investment
(FDI) differs substantially in a number of aspects, including control, duration and motive (Reddy, 2015). In
contrast to portfolio investment which involves buying of securities like stocks and bond in the foreign
country and expecting them to have a financial returns, FDI is deeper more long-term engagement directly
involving a firm or an investor to taking a control of the business assets or operation in the foreign country
(Pettinger, 2021). Investment in foreign direct investment are normally directed towards sustaining its
presence in the host country to achieve access to markets, viz. , resources and strategic position over the
passing of times (Pearce, 2019). Additionally, FDI frequently varies from just inflow to technology,
management and best practices transfer to the host country which results in its further economic growth
and increase of industrial capabilities (as Qi, 2007 implies). Besides, FDI subjects investors to higher
regulatory oversight and involved either additional risks and transaction costs due to the fact its operating
procedures are more complicated than those of portfolio investment and in this approach one has to
navigate unknown foreign business environments (Popovici & Călin,2014). Thus, these gaps present FDI
with a strategic character and a perspective of a long-term period which are inherent in the investors'
motive to get a continued presence in the host country and to benefit from its non-financial advantages. On
the other hand, the portfolio investment aims at the financial returns in terms of buying and selling of
securities where the investors has the usual tendency of being quite passive in the management and
governance of such invested assets (Reddy, 2015). Box with Both FDI and portfolio investment plays so
unique roles in the capitals flow across the globe and the diversity of investment industry, though FDI does
not equal to other thing but it is more relevant to the host economy that intends to attract the foreign capital,
Page 4 of 26
technology and expertise to encourage the development and growth of the economy and the country
(Pettinger, 2021). Thus, the ability for the authorities, the investment and business communities to
understand the differences between FDI and portfolio investment is crucial given that the current of
international investment processes are complex.
1.4 Global FDI trends and patterns
The tendency and patterns of foreign direct investment, as well as the factors pushing them, have been
altered drastically by the growing technological, political, and economic concerns (Qi, 2007). As a matter of
fact, emerging economies are such as those in Asia and Latin America have grown into pivotal recipients of
FDI, mainly because those economies have undergone fast growth, pursuit of liberalizing markets, and the
provision of favorable investment conditions (Pettinger, 2021). Interestingly, many sectors such as
manufacturing, services, and technology experienced high levels of inflows of foreign direct investments
(FDI) due to their prospects of becoming productive sectors and their strategic importance (Popovici &
Calin, 2014). The development of multinational companies (MNCs) and global value supply chains has shut
to shape FDI flows by, as the firms above opt rather to make cross-border investments and strategic
relations to maximize their production and distribution system (Pearce, 2019). However, worldwide FDI
movements are not still that safe from changes and uncertainties, or the reasons for those tensions could
be in connection with geopolitical, regulatory, or economic aspects including cycles (Reddy, 2015). Tough
undeniably, but the attractiveness of foreign direct investments remains indisputably influencing the
direction of globalization and boosting the global integration. Growth of interconnected economies is an
integral part and a vehicle for the transfer of technologies, diffusion of knowledge, and skill enhancement,
especially to developing countries (Qi, 2007). In addition, it is by the FDI that a market is diversified,
innovation is enhanced and the productivity goes up, which in turn ensures the growth of a nation and its
removal from poverty (Pettinger, 2021). Nevertheless, FDI can be more effective when countries establish
Page 5 of 26
good policies and a suitable regulatory framework that will enable them to attract appropriate investments,
safeguard their national interests and that will help mitigate these risks (Popovici & Călin, 2014). This is
done by creating conditions for FDI to thrive, allowing foreign capitals and expertise to be used in driving
the development and the socio-economic prosperity of countries, which is increasingly interdependent in
this highly connected world (Pearce, 2019).
2.0 Determinants of FDI Location Choice
2.1 Market size and potential demand
Markets' size as well as existing and potential demand are critical factors shaping foreign direct investment
(FDI) decisions. These factors indicate, among others, how big opportunities are gained in specific
countries or regions by investors. Particularly, big and incessantly growing markets will become very
attractive bases for companies whose main goal is to increase their number of customers and achieve
higher revenues (Nyamrunda & Freeman, 2021). In this regard, markets that involve several mom and pop
entrepreneurs that form a robust purchasing environment and favorable characteristics in terms of market
demography especially appeal to investors who play to maximize the emergence of new consumption
patterns and the buoyant consumer demand (Narula & Pineli, 2019). Moreover, economic growth may be
realized in the economies with the high consumption and production potential which in turn will spur the
economy of scales; elevate all forms of competitiveness and rationalize investments in production capacity
and distribution networks (Olney, 2013). Countries with large and active markets are hence likely to attract
foreign direct investments not just because they are big magnets for investors, but equally because the
growth opportunities therein are influential in optimizing returns on investment (Ng et al. , 2019). The
market appeal, for instance, is not only determined by its mere size, but it also takes into account factors
like rate of growth, PPP and trends in demography (Borensztein et al. , 1998). Investors, at any time,
analyze two components of the market: the existing environment as well as the future development
Page 6 of 26
prospects, which the specific market segment might face (Lee & Lee, 2017). Moreover, market allure is
given different attribute like market opening, regulation, infrastructure and stability, which inall determine
investment climate as well as risk reward ratio (Cui, & Jiang, 2012)As a result, governments as well as
policymakers become such key players in creating an enabling environment that is most conducive to a
higher level of foreign direct investment, by the implementation of policies that help to improve market
competitiveness, make market access easier and involve risk mitigation (Blonigen et al. , 2014). Vastly,
size of the market and potential demand play key roles as strategic factors affecting foreign direct
investments aiming countries opening up more by meeting investors' objectives.
2.2 Availability of natural resources and inputs
Tendency of foreign direct investment (FDI) in countries with abundant natural resources and inputs is
closely correlated with, especially for those industrial fields dependent on, such resources like mining,
agriculture, and energy (Nguyen & Kalirajan, 2016). Those countries that are blessed with a wide range of
natural resources such as minerals, oil and timber tend to be identified as attractive locations for large
foreign direct investments by MNCs interested in exploiting these resources and undertaking the operations
(McNamaram & Freeman, 2021). Moreover, availability of inputs like lands, water, and raw materials for
industries not only helps equal competitiveness at every point but as well ensures smooth shuffling in value
chains (Olney, 2013). Additionally, countries that have well-established logistics networks and roadway
infrastructure for input transportation and storage are remarkably desirable to investors because they
promise to incur lower sunk-costs and manage supply chain risks (Narula & Pineli, 2019). As a result,
natural resources availability along with the strong position of inputs are among the primary key factors that
influence foreign direct investment location decision, particularly in resources-rich countries. Last but not
the least, an abundance in natural resources can also help strengthen the economy in terms of diversifying
the sources of income and in developing the country by the creation of jobs which in turn promote growth in
Page 7 of 26
the economy (Bleaney & Greenaway, 2001). Nevertheless, natural resources which give preference to FDI
exposes such countries to dangers like environmental degradation, depletion of resources and price
fluctuations of commodities (Caves, Moore, & Venables, 1996). Recently, countries need to do responsible
resource policies which can include sustainable usage, value addition, and other strategies such as
investments in other sectors of the economy to limit dangers of natural resource dependence (Borensztein
et al. , 1998). Furthermore, innovation and skilled human resources development may additionally bring
more creation value from natural resources which in turn leads to the flow-in of higher-value investments
(Gelb et al. , 1988). In contrary, environmental resources can have a big impact to the FDI either in either
side. Therefore, the sustainable use of those resources and finding a way to lead them to broader
economic development, it will result in lasting prosperity.
2.3 Cost of labor and productivity
The main points of differentiation for an investor studying outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), are the
cost of the labor and the level of production based on the fact that these two parameters determine how
efficient the work is and determines how the work is performed (Olney, 2013). The previous days,
addressing the issue of profiting in high-labor sectors such as manufacturing, textiles as well as consumer
electronics was perfected by successfully established companies in countries referred as “low-wage
countries”. Thus, the problem around the “low-wage networks” is now a discussed matter for hundreds of
researchers. Furthermore, the flow of capital for the cities that have skilled and efficient workers will be
significantly increasing when the investment is made for transferring the technology and science (Nguyen
et al. 2016). Investors carry out tests such as „the labour market is properly constructed‟,the labour market
regulations are sound,employers train employees suitably and if there is flexibility in the labor marketThese
are the two major aspects (thematic areas) that they explore (Narula & Pineli, 2019). Labor market
regulation consists of several factors, such as those that can be picked from minimum wage polices or
Page 8 of 26
employer obligation laws with unionization that influence the pricing level and dynamics of recruitment and
firing activities. Specialization for labor market, workforce training and other vocation trainings are
prerequisite for liberating the labor force from doing lesser tasks with low compensations and at the same
time increase their skill levels, which in turn make the foreign investors to come and work with personnel
that are capable enough of handling particular jobs adequately. (Blomstrom & Sjöholm, 1999). On the other
hand, this is related to freezing or a regulated labor market where flexibility of the labor market plays a
crucial role. This includes comfort in hiring and firing, setting of wages, and labor mobility (Bachmann &
David, 2018). Therefore, the relationship among labor cost level, productivity level, and the other factors of
the FDI as well as the investment strategies has been an important factor in the decision making process of
the investment plan that includes the assertion of the feasibility of FDI and the designation of investment
strategy.
2.4 Political stability and regulatory environment
Political stability and business environment in a country can be defined as the most deciding forces
determining the amount of foreign direct investment (FDI) that flows into a country, making investors decide
whether to invest or not, and how they have to take control of the risks and work efficiently (Nguyen &
Kalirajan, 2016). Nations whose political systems are stable, institutions are strong, and policies are
predictable are always psychophysically appealing in investment because they give their investors a great
business environment for long-term investment(Nyamrunda & Freeman 2021). Therefore regulation
systems that are clearly laid out , transparent, enforces business contracts and property rights can very well
lower the probability of investment risks, transaction costs among the trade partners (Olney, 2013).
Whereas political turmoil, corruption, regulatory uncertainty, and irregular policy decisions are just
envisioned as deterrence of foreign direct investments as they perpetuate business risks and shatter
investors‟ confidence, among many others (Narula & Pineli, 2019). Hence, the nations with reliability in
Page 9 of 26
politics and working framework of the business sector will be more complain to FDI as well as the economic
development and growth in the country. Other than risk reduction political stability also takes investor
confidence to the next level and brings clarity in the decision-making processes leading to long-term
commitment and strategic investments(Doh & Teegen, 2002). Also, the example of a transparent and
effective regulatory atmosphere results in fair competition, pushes the development of innovations, and
improves the market performance obtained at the end - a sustainable economic progress (Busse&
Hefeker,2007). As a result, policymakers need to assign political stability and regulatory reforms the top
priority in order to provide FDI inflows with favorable conditions promoting economic progress and
convincing people to choose the path of development.
3.0 Host Country Policies for Attracting FDI
3.1 Investment promotion strategies and incentives
Investment attraction strategies and incentives are indeed main catchphrases as while working towards the
goal of bringing foreign direct investment (FDI), which is key in creating a nice business environment and
giving intended people something that can be seen as benefits. Many governments and investment
promotion agencies use different approaches to invite FDI such making instances tax rebates, subsidies,
grants and special facilities/instruction for foreign investors with the aims of reducing investment costs,
lowering the risks, and increasing competitiveness of host countries in capturing the FDI inflows (Malikane
& Chitambara, 2018). Furthermore, balancing the accounts of investment promotion embraces the use of
multiple foreign-exchange methods like marketing campaigns, networking events, and investor outreach
programs. This entails creating a friendly environment by attracting investment in certain fields or regions,
together with the present factors which will affect a potential investor. Countries that efficiently implement
investment attraction strategies and incentives will be seen as international investment attractive by foreign
investors who will invest with a purpose of stimulating the growth and bringing about the creation of
Page 10 of 26
employment opportunities. Investment promotion agencies frequently work together with trade
associations, chambers of commerce, and developmental agencies, among others, so as to ensure that
outreach efforts are passed on and expertise shared among the various entities which collectively
contribute to bringing in FDI(Dunning, 2014). Different economies creates free trade zones (SEZs) and
special economic zones (FTZs) through instrumentalities which are equipped with infrastructure, regulatory
incentives, and logistics that attracts FDI and fosters development in the targeted areas (UNCTAD, 2017).
In addition, some states give investment guarantees or political risk insurance packages to investors in
high-risk emerging economies or in nations having volatile politics to reduce the risks that are perceived to
be involved in investing there, thereby providing peace of mind to potential investors which increases their
confidence in staking their capital (OECD, 2019).
3.2 Trade policies and regional integration
The range of trade tools, which embraces the financial as well as the administrative instruments, and is in
line with tariffs quotas, subsidies and trade agreements, the government's trade flows regulation tools
(Narayanan and Bhat, 2017). These policies were formed to gain for itself a multitude of objectives called
export promotion, sectoral protectionism and FDI attraction and others (Corp. Martin & Özyurt, 2014).
Besides this, the tariff rates go down and transit of foreign direct investment (FDI) barriers which reduces
the risks, and this can stimulate the flow of foreign investments because currently the market is open and
risks are less likely to occur (Lee & Xuan, 2019). There comes the internal financial systems within the
nations which have usually the free trade agreements between them alongside the other global trade pacts
to attract increased cross border trade and foreign investments (Malikane and Chitambara 2018). These
memos are aiming to basicize the trading rules so that to simplify the customs possibility as well as to
reciprocate on the part of the services and goods that are shared by the member states as well. This
uniformity in the case of shared states is creating a huge influence to attract to participate investors to the
Page 11 of 26
economies. Furthermore, the facilities of the region for trade integration are notable factors for altering the
pattern of FDI by way of the integration among Ireland, Britain and other countries into one economy like it
was (Narayanan & Bhat, 2017). Besides iplicateational efficiency and regional integrationergements by the
countries as a tool for harmonizing the rules and regulations, streamlining trade processes and creating
larger and unified markets are the main keys to economic growth. (Mitze & Özyurt, 2014)Through the tariffs
synergies, economies of scale are unleashed, enabling industry members to access larger market size,
enjoy cost efficiencies, and eventually, these business operators are incentivised to invest more in these
areas. Hence, the two major building blocks of FDI – trade policies and the regional integration policy-
instruments have strong relationships as they become the motives of the investment decision-making
process and contribute notably to the economy.
3.3 Infrastructure development and business facilitation
Sustainability of country`s attractiveness for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) are highly dependant on three
essential elements: infrastructure development, business facilitation elements and a stable political
environment. These factors consequently play a critical role to a large number of factors in business,
including how you can operate, how efficient you are in your logistical aspects, and the cost of operation
(Narayanan & Bhat, 2017). One common reason behind the preference of investors for nations with already
established infrastructures which include: transportation, communications, energy, and utilities is that these
countries carry from distinct benefits emerging from having such networks. For example the development of
the infrastructure n comes with lower production costs, better supply chain management, and the enabling
the market reach. Moreover, the presence of thorough business facilitation laws increases the profitability
of that country to some investors. For example bureaucratic obstacles and transactions costs for investors
(Moosa, 2015) can be overcome or reduced by the facilitation of a user-friendly procedure, a transparent
regulatory framework and an effective public services. Investing in the infrastructure and supporting
Page 12 of 26
businesses not is a mere attraction, and it is imperative to enhance the competitive edge of a country
together with attracting higher volumes of the foreign direct investment. In addition, this type of investments
attracts also other additional investments and contributes thereby directly to the economic growth. PPPs
(public-private partnerships) and financial instruments such as strategic infrastructure investment programs
are successfully employed in order to deal with the current infrastructure deficit and drive the sustainable
future. Through the use of private sector resources and knowledge, governments can quicken the pace of
infrastructure development and assured the same sustainability and in line with overall development goals
simultaneously. In the end, infrastructure formations, business help, and strategic partner cooperate to
propose a strategy that intends to attract FDI as well as to create a good environment for sustainable
economy growth.
3.4 Intellectual property rights and legal framework
The good thing about intellectual property rights (IPR) and a strong legal framework is that; they are
fundamentally crucial determinants that influence foreign direct investment (FDI) decision making,
especially in knowledge intensive sectors which include technology, pharmaceuticals, and creative
industries (Lee & Xuan, 2019). The countries that legislate and enforce strong IPR regimes and legal
guarantee create a secure environment attracting innovators, performers and researchers. Investors'
trustworthiness is guaranteed by a legal framework involving the protection of property rights, the
expeditious processing of contracts, and the development of dispute resolution mechanisms; this
framework also helps to mitigate legal risks (Mitze & Özyurt, 2014). It is necessary to implement
mechanisms for safeguarding intellectual property rights and imposing legal certainty in order to attract
much needed FDI inflows like foreign investments into research initiatives, tourist arrivals, or high-value-
added projects (Moosa, 2015). Likewise, compliance with international standards and intellectual property
protection agreements boost a country's trustworthiness and reputation as an appealing market for FDI (as
Page 13 of 26
Kim et al. 2016 put it). To this end, a strong stance on intellectual property rights and an appropriate legal
framework implies the only way forward for developments in innovation, attraction of investments and
economic growth on the globalized economy. In practice, a healthy legal framework is not merely there as a
form of deterring people from stealing or infringing on intellectual property, but it also creates a way of
settling disputes. This type of legal security and predictability in judicial decisions are extremely important
for businesses in the industries involved with technology, where the worth of intellectual property in most
cases is much more than the worth of the tangible assets. Additionally, upholding the principle of the
contract and defending the property right can drive a long-term investment commitment thereby leading to
stabilization and growth of the economy. Hence, it is a responsibility of policymakers that they formulate
and implement sturdy legal systems and robust intellectual property rights regime in order to create the
favorable climates for research and development as well as investments for economic advancements.
4.0 Impact of FDI on Host Economies
4.1 Technology transfer and productivity spillovers
FDIs (Foreign direct investments) are largely responsible for transfer of technology and productivity
externalities; in turn, this makes a positive impact on socioeconomic growth of host country making its
economy much robust (Gossel, 2020). Although being engines of international integration of market, MNCs
serve as current vehicle for enhancement of local production. Technology and processes skills,
management techniques, and valuable human resources. Consequently, innovation, production efficiency
improvements and local industry growth are taking place. Foreign direct investment businesses normally
establish supplier networks, finance training programs, and conduct research partnerships with regional
academic institutions for the purpose of acquiring knowledge and skills to be diffused into the local
businesses (Globerman and Shapiro, 2018). Following such exchanges, a company will soon become
acquainted with the fact that productivity is enhanced as well by its healthier competition and of the local
Page 14 of 26
business environment. Besides, the domestic construction of the required infrastructure, along with the
MNC's scope for connecting the host economy to the world economy, are enabled through their partnership
involvement (Narula, 2020). For this as well, they noticeably emanate an flow through the demand for
computing & intermediate goods, by which local suppliers and related businesses are also pushed to be
dependents. However, he showed that the arrival of FDIs is likely to rouse other investors to join in with
them in a venture which may later be followed by advancement of technology and an increase in the
technology capacity of the host country (Javorcik, 2015). Thereby, besides the influencing role of the
individual factor, FDI in the economic growth also induces the effects of inter-industrial adaptation which
spread to the whole of the economy constituents and spurs perpetual economic growth and development
(UNCTAD, 2020). Thus, technological progress that arises from FDI acts as the summation of the
development chain with the cutting-edge innovations in the technology ecosystems and the sparking of
productivities within and across various sectors.
4.2 Employment generation and skill development
Foreign direct investment (FDI) holds a significant place among the factors that stimulate employment and
skill enhancement in host countries by providing job opportunities, illustrating human capital development,
and enhancing knowledge transfers (Gachino, 2018). MNCs can be a catalyst in this area by using their
investments for creating employment, vocational-training, and capacity-building-programs, which in turn
ultimately increase the workforce employability and productivity as well (Hufbauer and Chua, 2019). To
illustrate, the process of MNCs working in collaboration with local training institutions to design specific
courses that are aimed at the peculiarities of the operation results in bridging skills gaps and up-skilling the
labor force. Further, the growth in foreign investment projects alongside new production setups normally
escalates demand for more work in different sectors of the nation's economy (Globerman & Shapiro, 2018).
The increased demand did not only make use of the existing work force but also brought more individuals
Page 15 of 26
to the job market, thus limiting unemployment rates and improving socio-economic conditions. Besides, FDI
parties may involve themselves in apprenticeships programs and technological practices including on the
job training, hence offering the participants valuable practical skills and basic understanding of most of the
current technological developments. Also, multi-national corporations (MNCs) are normally the catalysts for
the growth of secondary industries such as those of local supply of commodities for the host nation as well
as various support services that lead to more job opportunities (UNCTAD, 2019). Moreover, FDI becomes a
foundation for transmitting the knowledge, newest ideas, and effective practices from the foreign
companies to the domestic ones through a variety of channels including supplier ties, technology diffusion,
and managerial experience (Dunning, 2019). This technology spillovers does not only help local firms to
increase their capacities but also boosts the country‟s economy that is, growth and competitiveness of the
host country‟s economy. Hence, FDI not only generates jobs but fosters labor training, human capital
formation, and labor market integration, and in the end considerably contributes to lasting social and
economic development.
4.3 Competition and market structure effects
Commit international investment to host countries represent a double-edged sword such that it can be a
useful tool to foster domestic competition and transfer some expertise to industries (Hufbauer & Chua,
2019). It is seen clearly that MNCs as they zoom to the international arena indeed, find space for
developing new products, technologies, and business systems to the local market, which compete are
sophisticated, efficient, and innovative (Gossel, 2020). This gave the national companies a set of criteria
they could be used for the purpose, the customers or even the competitors in product or service
advancement, improving the quality; as well, the customer satisfaction. Opposite to the coin, the home of
the game shifts to the possibility where some powerful foreign dominant players or such are united in an
effort of unreasonable competitor's behavior, such as predatory pricing or breaking the rules of open
Page 16 of 26
competition, instances of which can cause the weakest companies of local players lose their positions from
the market and get marginal pieces only. (Hassett &Mathur, 2015). Accordingly, it is clear that although
investors get the privilege of establishing a strong market structure and fiercer competition, state should not
interfere to ensure this kind of conflict does not emerge to weaken market structure and hinder the uniform
growth. These actions may include antitrust law passing, setting rules and regulations which will be the
domineering factor to the industry although the plan is based on developing the companies locally by
offering them adequate assistance as well as incentives. Also, rule-based bilateral or multilateral
agreements aside, the international investment process could use further collaboration to build partnerships
among a foreign and a domestic organizations by way of joint companies establishment or technology
transfer that will eventually help the host country to take full advantage of the industry and the market, at
the same time partially off-setting the negative effects of the investment on the local industry and the
domestic market.
4.4 Balance of payments and tax revenue
Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows have a very important role to play in leading for a host country‟s
balance of payment position and tax revenues (Hayakawa et al. , 2021). Besides FDI inflows currently
helping to finance the deficit of the current account, these flows also significantly improve the overall
economy of the country through the provision of capital inflow for investment in productive assets and the
nation‟s infrastructural projects (Globerman & Shapiro, 2018). Case in point, the foreign sector in exploding
markets is likely to concentrate on the provision of vital services in the sectors of energy,
telecommunications, and transportation. In addition, FDI projects of this type lead not only to more
production and export-oriented activities, but also generate export revenues, which is another important
factor impacting on the improvement of the trade balance and the current account sustainability (Hufbauer
& Chua, 2019). However, it mainly occurs in the areas that industries such as manufacturing and
Page 17 of 26
agriculture thrive; their production capacity may expand and advanced technology can be introduced by the
FDI. But on the other hand, one should keep in mind that FDI flows occur with the involvement of a number
of different aspects, so we should also consider the drawbacks. There might be some mixed results to the
foreign investment influx although it is the positive one. Firstly, it is the potential for outgoing income
payments related with the repatriation of profits and dividends to the parent companies maximizing the
benefits for foreign investors. The tax guidelines regarding FDI can exert looming impacts on tax revenue
collection by host countries. Some countries provide their existing tax laws with an exemption clauses in
favor of foreign investment and give more reliefs to encourage economic growth and job creation. Hence,
balancing the appropriate level of taxes to ensure that adequate revenue is generated while also
concurrently supporting public services and fiscal stability becomes an important policy role. Hence, the
management of balance of payment and the revenue from tax of the implications of the FDI requires that
policies are well coordinated and behavior of governance is effective.
5.0 Challenges and Risks Associated with FDI
5.1 Potential for market dominance and crowding-out
FDI (foreign direct investment) can impact extensively markets utilizing submarine power, and most likely
eliminate the domestic competitors, especially in small and emerging markets (Barrell & Pain, 2017). Large
multinational companies of course have more money, knowledge and far reaching networks which may
lead them to gain upper hand in market through dominance and exclude the entry of local firms (Blonigen,
2022). For instance, in the telecommunications sector, MNCs are most likely to invest in high performing
infrastructure and technology among small local players who are typically lagging in the adoption of latest
technologies. Also, the dominant foreign companies could have chance to take the price to distortion,
consumer choice to reduce, and stifle of competition as a result the overall consumer‟s welfare and
competitive position of local industries may be at an unfavorable level (Aziz & Mishra, 2016). Other than the
Page 18 of 26
process of crowding-out, FDI may also lead to local firms being displaced, resulting in the undermining of
their innovation and investment capability that can lead to loss of jobs in the local area (Agarwal, 2022). For
instance, in the industries such as retail or manufacturing, MNCs may enjoy the benefit of the economies of
scale or more efficient distribution networks to eke out the competition to their detriment from small local
businesses. Therefore, policymakers have to consider developing/refining of competition regulations,
market management and monitoring tools in order to reduce the concentration of the markets; provide a
competitive environment, and create a level playing field for everyone. Which include the measures of
enforcement of anti-trust regulations, monitoring to prevent monopolistic measures on mergers and
acquisitions and supporting and encouragement of of local firms to succeed in competition against foreign
firms. Furthermore, incentive and promotion of small scale innovations and entrepreneurship, through
specific government measures and initiatives can be empowered to soar, decrease the negative effects of
market dominance by allowing for more growth of local/domestic firms and further dynamics and
competitiveness in the business scene.
5.2 Environmental concerns and sustainable development
Despite not being so responsive to environmental issues, TVA also contributes in the integration of the
environmental concerns with the arising environmental challenges, and most of the industrial sectors which
are more energy intensive thus increasing the environmental pressure. While some industries may engage
in green technologies due to the increase in FDI inflows, they could be unintentionally involved in a greater
resource consumption, air pollution and loss of habitat (Koko Akinlo, 2020). Likewise, a capital inflow
scenario in which capital is invested in the mining and manufacturing industry can pose a much higher risk
to ecological degradation as it promotes the extraction and production processes which can in turn lead to
degradation of the ecosystem. Also, MNCs operating in ecologically strained business sectors would direct
their efforts to profit optimization given the high demand. Such practices can be extremely detrimental to air
Page 19 of 26
and water quality and the preservation and biodiversity of ecosystems (Amichia & Fallon, 2021). Besides
that, the absence of strong and firm environmental protection loopholes in addition to lenient rules and
inadequate implementation strategies of host countries would only lead to the intensification of the
environmental decay, therefore, contradicting the goals of sustainability. There are instances with
developing nations, with lax frameworks, indeed it is MNCs who take action to destroy environment in a
short term economic gain. In this vein, the authorities will draw up stringent environmental regulations,
significant increase for green technologies as well as sense of social responsibility for the investors who
needs to observe the principles of green technology in order to mitigate the negative impacts of FDI on the
environmental conditions and to aid attaining of SDG goals. The plan of possible actions might include the
tightening of emissions standards, the ecological analysis of foreign direct investments, or the condition for
multinational corporations to promote environmental technologies and practices by using positive
notifications. On the other hand, good governance entails the creation of corridors that allows governments,
businesses, and civil society organizations to come together and develop projects that will inhibit
investment and result in long-term development, thus, FDI can be used as part of the investment strategy.
5.3 Transfer pricing and tax avoidance issues
Foreign direct investment (FDI) rounds off with foreign direct investment (FDI) as those being the most
controversial aspect of multinational corporations eliciting fears about transfer pricing practices and tax on
income avoidance strategies conducted by such big companies in multinational corporations in order to
minimize their tax liability (Barrell & Pain, 2017). These companies may be transferred by exploitation of
transfer prices through inflating the prices of internal dealings and then converting the profits to low-tax
jurisdictions and host countries by this, they can evade the payment taxes (Blonigen, 2022). This is
evidenced by matters such as a multinational company marking its subsidiary ostensibly higher price for
goods and services so as to deduct from the profits of the higher tax jurisdiction and add up out in the lower
Page 20 of 26
tax one. Moreover, wide tax planning strategies, such as profit shifting, treaty shopping and tax haven
country use that MNCs execute in order to benefit from the discrepancies among international tax
regulations and avoid paying taxes are also among practices that they use (Carkovic & Levine, 2018). It is
a mechanism that can be used by them to legally minimize their tax payment which Nation sometimes sees
that important resources has been stripped off their tax revenues. Hence, host countries can expect
leakages of potential revenues, escalation of tax erosion, and mal-distribution of tax burdens which are all
potential threats to their public finances and socio-economic growth (Buchanan et al. , 2017). As a result,
tackling transfer price anomalies via strong tax policies inclusive of antitax avoidance measures and
international tax cooperation is of the utmost importance. Imposition of tax fairness, transparency, and
sustainable fiscal stability will thus be attained. Apart from the above, measures such as the
implementation of transfer prices rules that are compatible with the international standards, strengthening
tax enforcement capabilities, and accelerating the discourse around greater transparency and data sharing
can be useful too. While international cooperation and coordination between governments, business
institutions and regulators across the globe can be used to prevent tax evasion and make sure that
multinational corporations contribute towards the upliftment of society where they have positioned
themselves.
5.4 Political risks and investor-state disputes
There is a reason why foreign direct investments (FDI) are known to be exposed to investor-state disputes:
regulatory changes, uncertainties in the policies, and geopolitical tensions (Agarwal, 2022). These
countries may suffer from some sort of policy changes, state property threats or legal controversies with the
investors from abroad that lead to investment uncertainty and capital flight (Aziz & Mishra, 2016). Take for
example the situation where such things like shifting business environment rules or legislation arise that
touch on such issues as taxation, trade or regulate investment in specific industry areas carry a lot of
Page 21 of 26
weight and make foreign investors retreat and not to invest. Next, alongside political instability, corruption,
and governance issues that threaten investment and investors‟ fidelity, governments of host countries might
add to the risks of the business (Buchanan et al. , 2017). In those nation where corruption is deep-seated
or governments are week or inept, investors may be met with the full brunt of the difficulties of obtaining
permits, navigating through mazes, or enforcing contracts. Such hiccups add to the investors' exposure to
political risks. In Case Of disputes between investors and host states which are brought about by a breach
of investment agreements or a violation of property rights, a deal can arise that can cause not only financial
but also reputational loss (Blonigen, 2022). The major problem is the ways in which host governments can,
in the absence of international rules, act in such a way that foreign investors interpret it as unjust
enrichment which then takes long litigations that give way to future investors. Thus, the measures aimed at
reinforcing political stability, the rule of the law and the plain and predictable regulatory framework are
necessary to tackle political risks, protect investor rights and create a conducive investment environment
required for the stable and sustainable FDI flows. Examples of how this may be achieved include regulatory
frameworks which guarantee investment safeguards, establishment of court systems which are
independent from the government, and dialogue with stakeholders to deal with any complaints or
grievances in a creative way.
Page 22 of 26
6.0 References
Agarwal, J. P. (2022). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A review. Journal of International
Business and Economy, 23(1), 1-25.
Akinlo, A. E. (2020). Determinants of foreign direct investment in the ECOWAS region. Journal of Economic
Integration, 35(1), 101-124.
Amichia, A. I., & Fallon, G. (2021). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Evidence from sub-
Saharan Africa. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 347-366.
Aziz, O. G., & Mishra, A. V. (2016). Determinants of foreign direct investment inflows to Arab economies.
Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3), 325-342.
Barrell, R., & Pain, N. (2017). Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within
Europe. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1770-1786.
Blonigen, B. A. (2022). Foreign direct investment behavior and location determinants of multinational
corporations: A review. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5), 915-940.
Buchanan, B. G., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2017). Institutional quality, political risk and FDI revisited. Journal
of International Business and Economy, 18(2), 1-20.
Carkovic, M., & Levine, R. (2018). Does foreign direct investment accelerate economic growth? In H. T.
Patrick & Y. C. Park (Eds.), The Multinational Enterprise and Economic Development (pp. 195-
220). Routledge.
Chakrabarti, A. (2020). The impact of regional trade agreements on foreign direct investment: A review of
major findings. In R. S. Rajan (Ed.), Handbook of Trade and Development (pp. 269-284). Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Page 23 of 26
Chaudhuri, S., & Mukhopadhyay, U. (2014). Foreign direct investment in developing countries: A theoretical
evaluation. Springer.
Dang, H. (2021). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth: Evidence from Vietnam.
Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 1015-1024.
Davies, R. B., & Desbordes, R. (2020). Greenfield versus merger and acquisition FDI: A review of the
empirical literature. In T. J. Kemsley & G. Matzunaga (Eds.), The Multinational Firm (pp. 125-148).
Springer.
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar
Publishing.
Enache, C., & Micu, A. (2022). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: A literature review.
Theoretical and Applied Economics, 29(2), 89-102.
Faeth, I. (2009). Determinants of foreign direct investment – A tale of nine theoretical models. Journal of
Economic Surveys, 23(1), 165-196.
Fetai, B. (2015). Determinants of foreign direct investment and its impacts on economic growth: The case
of Western Balkan countries. ILIRIA International Review, 5(1), 9-23.
Furceri, D., Hannan, S. A., Ostry, J. D., & Rose, A. K. (2019). Macroeconomic consequences of
Gachino, G. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A panel data
analysis. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(1), 1-20.
Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2018). The impact of outward FDI on the labor market: Evidence from
Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 44(4), 321-336.
Page 24 of 26
Gossel, S. J. (2020). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in developing countries: Does the
sector matter? Journal of Economic Development, 45(2), 1-20.
Hassett, K. A., & Mathur, A. (2015). A spatial model of capital mobility and tax competition. Economic
Policy Review, 21(1), 1-35.
Hayakawa, K., Lee, H. H., & Park, D. (2021). Do foreign direct investment inflows lead to gross exports?
Evidence from ASEAN countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(4),
483-507.
Hufbauer, G. C., & Chua, A. J. (2019). U.S. foreign direct investment: A firm-level analysis. Peterson
Institute for International Economics.
Kim, D. H., Lin, S. C., & Suen, Y. B. (2016). Investment across ethnic lines: Do local residents value non-
local investors? Journal of Financial Economics, 121(1), 191-220.
Kowalski, P. (2017). Economic Determinants of FDI in Transition Economies: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of
Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1092-1118.
Lee, J. W., & Xuan, Y. (2019). Effects of technology licensing on domestic productivity growth: A study of
post hp-spin-off in Southeast Asia. Research Policy, 48(1), 168-182.
Malikane, C., & Chitambara, P. (2018). Foreign direct investment, democracy and economic growth in
southern Africa. African Development Review, 30(1), 92-111.
Mitze, T., & Özyurt, S. (2014). The localized effects of workforce reductions on neighboring regions. The
Annals of Regional Science, 53(3), 731-757.
Moosa, I. A. (Ed.). (2015). Foreign direct investment: Theory, evidence and practice. Springer.
Page 25 of 26
Narayanan, G., & Bhat, S. (2017). Technology sourcing and outward FDI: A study of IT firms in India.
Technovation, 59, 31-41.
Narula, R., & Pineli, A. (2019). Improving the developmental impact of multinational enterprises: Policy and
research challenges. Economies, 7(2), 42.
Ng, T. H., Lye, C. T., & Lim, Y. S. (2019). A higher institutional quality or lower political risk? An empirical
study of foreign direct investment. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(1), 261-279.
Nguyen, N. A., & Kalirajan, K. (2016). Exports and profitability: A note from the resource sector of Vietnam.
Journal of Asian Economics, 44, 12-21.
Nyamrunda, F. C., & Freeman, S. L. (2021). Nonlinear impact of corruption on FDI in emerging economies.
Economic Modelling, 94, 417-430.
Olney, W. W. (2013). A race to the bottom? Employment protection and foreign direct investment. Journal
of International Economics, 91(2), 191-203.
Pearce, R. D. (2019). The location of outward FDI and the multinational enterprise: Some analytical issues.
In J. H. Dunning & S. M. Lundan (Eds.), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (pp.
113-144). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pettinger, T. (2021). Determinants of FDI. Economics Help.
Popovici, O. C., & Călin, A. C. (2014). Trends and specific risks on the markets of foreign direct investment.
Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 277-286.
Qi, L. (2007). The relationship between growth, total factor productivity, and foreign direct investment. In M.
S. Ghauri (Ed.), Modern Development Economics (pp. 135-155). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Page 26 of 26
Reddy, K. S. (2015). Tax incentives and investment in the developing world. In J. Alm & J. Martinez-
Vazquez (Eds.), Taxation and Development: The Weakest Link? (pp. 159-178). Edward Elgar
Publishing. remittances. Journal of International Money and Finance, 97, 102-118.
