Page 1 of 25
LEASE FINANCING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND
DECISION-MAKING
I. Overview of Lease Financing
1.1. Definition and types of leases.
Leases are legal documents stating that one of the contracting parties – the lessor – transfers the
right to the temporary possession of an asset to the other party – the lessee – in exchange for
payment in regular intervals. Leases can be categorized as operating leases and capital leases
based on whether the lesse regards the risks and benefits of the ownership of the dem as being
borne by the dem or transferred to the lease. Hence, operating leases are mostly short-term
where control over the asset resides with the lessor and he retains most of the risk of the various
income and expenses related to the asset. Finance/Operating leases: finance leases are those
long term contracts where the lessee agrees to take the asset as if the owner and accepts almost
all the losses and gains of ownership. An operating lease is used for those valuable and long
useful significant resources while finance lease resembles borrowing for the lessee. The lessee
makes use of the leased assets for its operational requirements and recognizes the lease payments
as assets on its balance sheet and as leases and expenses it in the form of interest. This paper is
an expansion of Altamuro, Johnston, Pandit, and Zhang (2014) in which they write on Operating
leases and operating leverage observations that relate to lease structures are suggestive of certain
operating characteristics and performance implications. Primarily, lessees who have operating
leases are reported to have a relatively low influence on financial leverage; this is so since most
operating leases do not allow the lessor to retain the title to the underlying asset. However, they
affect the amounts, such as debt to equity ratios and rates of return on assets. Another recent
work done by Andres, Cumming, Karaulova & Kooli seeks to establish effects and/or
Page 2 of 25
consequences of lease accounting, particularly with regard to the cost of private debt and stress
that one has to consider the various types of leases when deciding on financial matters. These
are respectively said to comprise the nature of the lease in a manner that can may alter its
perception by the creditors and investors, through its accounting treatment. For instance, finance
leases which reported in the statement of financial position as an asset and liability due to
receivables and payables affects credit strengths and borrowing prices while operating leases that
are not appear in the statement of financial position has different effects.
1.2. Benefits and drawbacks of leasing
There are a number of advantages associated with leasing , skipping initial ownership costs, the
opportunity to release cash for investment for other more crucial areas of business, the kind of
mobility in business including asset specialization. These advantages may be useful for those
companies that are ready to expand the scale of operations, or to replace the industrial and other
fixed assets without using substantial of its own resources. However, with the advent of such it
also has its drawbacks which makes it also good to ponder on as part of a better overall business
planning. The last of the issue can be captured by the fact that leasing at some point often proves
to be more costly than owning in all manners. However, leasing reduces the need for capital
investment that is incurred at the inception period of an asset‟s usage though leasing an asset is
relatively costly as compared to making a full cash payment in the long run. Besides, realisation
in leasing may result to a threat that the lessee may gain the ownership and control of the assets,
right of conversion, alteration or even customization of the assets. This paper was also able to
point out some disadvantage of leasing which include: South African law: Depending on the
lessor s terms and conditions. Despite the nature of the lessee-seller contracts some of the
contracts that may be implemented include limitation of use of assets, maintenance
Page 3 of 25
responsibilities and termination to which an organization may have an impact on the
organizations the operational flexibility and the strategic planning. Indeed, when it comes to the
relationship between such factors as deferred taxes and intangible in as far as lease decisions are
concerned, Arcelus, Mitra and Srinivasan (2005) gives a glimpse of possible future development
and leasing strategies. Similarly, contrary to this study, Juster, and Riddiough (2009) identified
several measurable factors that should be considered in the leasing decisions since they
significantly determine the cost of leasing comprise of tax cost and accounting treatment.
According to Beatty, Liao, and Zhang (2019), lease leverage has the following criteria where
they claim that using leases extensively requires seven reporting standards to ensure that lease
accounting augments the benefits and costs. OH: Specifically, well-defined and harmonized
lease-accounting standard and policy give investors, creditors and other users an understanding
of the financial report‟s formulation of the lease liabilities, thus aiding them in formulating their
decision based on the report.
1.3. Lease vs. buy decision factors
The basis of lease- or buy-decisions made up of financial parameters, business and strategic
targets and the risk appetite of the firm. Focusing on their study, wherein Bratten, Choudhary,
and Schipper (2013) attempted to determine the valuation methods of recognized and disclosed
items in lease contracts, these authors emphasized that the proper information is critical in the
marketplace. It also sheds some additional light on the need to make sure that the firms develop
and report on reliable and relevant information on the leases, to enable the market players
evaluate the effectiveness of leasing compared to buying. Thus, in the context of corporate lease
equity valuation, one cannot overlook the barrier option of Brockman & Turtle (2003) as the
lease agreement also contains the option value in terms of flexibility. This framework also notes
Page 4 of 25
that leasing arrangements provide structural organisations more benefits than simply owning
structures as it allows the to adjust the particular assets leasing arrangements make reference to
for usage according to emerging requirements without necessarily being bound using the
practical ownership of each of those structures in the long run. As a result, the advantage of this
option consists in the possibility of improving the decisions made by businesses regarding
leasing as a more lucrative form of performance in comparison with purchasing, when such
conditions as the existence of an offer on the market and the usefulness of additional objects are
met. These attributes ensure that by the time a firm is making a particular decision it takes into
consideration the implication that the particular decision will have on the institution‟s fiscal plan
and other organizational requirements. These are costs and covers cash flow, tax benefits and
cost of capital among others, which are directly associated with the financial risks that surround
leasing or purchasing an asset. Strategic goals and objectives are the main factors to consider
deciding between leasing and purchasing because flexibility and scalability, being integral
elements of growth plans, impact the company positively. Here, other factors like risk taking
ability and risk management also come, because leasing and other formalities that are involved in
procuring this asset, would be different from any other and has different risks associated with it.
II. Accounting Treatment of Leases
1.1. Operating leases vs. capital leases.
It is self-evident that operating leases and capital leases are two fundamental categories of lease
agreements which are qualitatively distinguished by differences in the effects relevant to the
accounting treatments in the financial statements of the corporations. In accordance with the
conceptual framework noncurrent operating leases are also agreements within which the owner
of the asset is the operating lease lessor and the operating lease lessee pays fixed rent
Page 5 of 25
periodically. These are considered off balance sheet leases which is the typical of conventional
accounting policies. On its balance sheet, the lessee does not include the leased asset or the lease
liability which might hide the lessee‟s obligations and/or exaggerate financial intensity. While
with capital leases or financial leases it is an extended agreement under which the lessee acquires
the ownership right over the property in the leased property the main outcome is that it appears
as source of liability and asset in the balance sheet. This type of classification gives recognition
to the notion that for the economic life of the asset, the lessee has indeed „purchased‟ the asset.
This indicates that while operating leases have smaller lease payments akin to rental agreements,
capital leases have larger payments and their terms are more similar to a financing agreement
with the lessee usually having bulk of the presumed ownership risks most of the time. The
research of Chambers, Karimullah, and Wei (2022) relates to how the classification of leases can
influence key financial indicators and thus create a different perception of companies‟ debt
levels: in connection with the legal requirements for recognizing liabilities. Classification of
leases between operating and capital may have an impact on the companies‟ balance sheets and
their overall assessments; specifically, leverage ratios, which are indicated in terms of debt-
equity and debt-assets. These ratios are used by the investors and the creditors with the aim of
determining the risk factor of the company and its credit worthiness and therefore, proper lease
classification is important in promoting corporate disclosures among Companies to the global
markets. While employing the criteria prescribed by Chen, Folsom, Paik, and Tsui (2021) it is
possible to determine the implication of operating lease and financing transactions for
organizations. This paper will show that when recognized and/or measured inappropriately,
leases can indeed be used to spin financial statements in ways that portray the company in a
different, potentially healthier or more profitable light than is warranted.
Page 6 of 25
1.2. Changes from FASB ASC 842 rules
The latest lease accounting standards being put into practice by FASB known as ASC 842
present material new provisions, and most pertain to the recognition of leases in company
balance sheets. As per this guidance note, the recognition criteria of operating lease assets and
operating lease liabilities is as follows: “When it is virtually certain, at the lease commencement
date, that the leasing term is the useful life of the underlying asset, and the lease payments are
based on the stand-alone selling price of the underlying asset rather than the acquisition or
construction of the underlying asset. According to the article Fülöp and Kálmán 2019, which
looks into the effects of the new model of lease accounting and taxation, it is made inform that
companies should be ready to embrace the change and adopt ASC 842. Additionally, the assets
under the operating lease agreement also have effects on the taxation policies, depreciation
deduction and the taxable income computed by the businesses. In the paper titled,
“Comprehensive income and firm value and operating performance: Exploring lease accounting
changes and firm value and operating performance: the extent of the problem in time to remind
us that awareness of the new rules is as critical as positive financial management changing the
rules requires, Gill (2021) reveals the changes in lease accounting to provide an empirical
analysis of this important subject. Another important factor regarding the modification of lease
accounting is concerning to investors and analysts due to utopization of the current and future
profile of the absolute financial performance and risk of a business. The non-organic financial
elements affected include the debts and the returns of assets together with Earnings before
interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Managers and organizations operating
within this context should adopt proactive approaches when responding to these changes
particularly in regard to stakeholder relations and managing the impact that may be detrimental
Page 7 of 25
to the value and efficiency of the firm. ASC 842 is a new due that provides new rules for lease
accounting and which may change the way companies are currently accounting and reporting
their finances and its impact on taxation as well as its overall business decisions. The various
transitions within these changes include the following; proper analysis of current trends to make
sure that changes made reflect the current trends, assessments of the regulations and guidelines
for reporting where it is seen that some changes rendered may not be easily understood by the
average stake holder and involving other members of the reporting process to ensure that the
information is correct and accurate.
1.3. Impact on financial statements and ratios
It is pertinent to say it here as the effect of applying FASB ASC 842 rules is reflected by the
specific financial statements and key financial ratios. The newly recognised operating leases
which were not part of the balance sheet before is reflected in the assets and the consideration of
liabilities and results to change the overall debt, equity, and other such workings like return on
assets and interest coverage ratios. These changes give a better picture of the state of a firm‟s
and of its liabilities; therefore making the process of financial reporting policy more clear and
easy to reconcile. Graham, Harvey, and Rajgopal (2005) on the nature of the minimal economic
consequences of total reporting by corporations claim that shift in the accounting standards does
impact perceptions of investors and the valuations of the markets. Even though it has some
negative implications on some companies, and has integrated operating lease recognition on the
balance sheet through ASC 842, it assists in painting a more substantial picture of organizational
fiscal fitness and weakness. This would enhance the evaluations of the market and the different
tools IMA, which are made by investors and analyst, for this there is need for enhancement of
lease obligations and leases. Imhoff Jr, Lipe, and Wright (1991) pointed out that constructive
Page 8 of 25
capitalization of operating leases can indeed affect some facets of business appreciation As for
understanding how these changes could make it easier to gauge a firm, we move to the next step
of their argument. Concessional capitalization implies treat operation lease as funded purchases,
it has more superiority in conditions of financial leverage and operating activity. This strategy
coincides with the company going concern concept and also the need to prepare and present
corporate financial reports that are accurate, reliable, and impartial to the users of such reports
such as the investors, creditors and the other users. This is evident in the understanding of the
effects it has in assisting investors, especially the analysts and other stakeholders in the
preparation and analysis of financial statements. With the current implementation of ASC 842
rules, the credibility and relevance of the centralized report are increased due to improved
disclosure of leases information by any company.
III. Tax Implications of Leasing
1.1. Deductibility of lease payments for lessees.
It should be noted that this too has certain specificities; namely, similarly to with the lessees, the
deductibility of the lease payments largely depends on several factors: the kind of the lease and
the registered tax laws. While operating lease is taken for granted as an expense on rent for
business and is therefore a tax allowable expense. In capital leases, the lessees may be given the
chance to list down the rental costs in their balance sheet as an investment and yet be able to
depreciate the leased asset as and when it gets utilized. This approach influences both the accual
concept and the nature and/or time, at which, deductions in form of deducible expenses can be
effected from a leafs payment. It also enables the lessees to record the leased asset in the balance
sheet for the improvement of the financial statements and the credit rating of the lessees;
however it enables the lessees to redeem their initial deductible expenses in the first years of
Page 9 of 25
their financial operating period through capitalizing lease payments as compared to operating
leases. Levi and Benjamin (2002) on certain issues that may have some bearing on lessees and
are as follows: On the impact of convergence between accounting entries – US GAAP and
international accounting standards on Income tax. Concerning leasing, there may be difference
in revenue recognition concerning accounting practice In as much as there may be difference in
tax allocation for expenses for leases. Resolving different legal systems international firms aim
to commit with the current tax and try to find the way to use less money with following
accounting standards. Jennings & Marrs(2022) analyse the implication of ASC 842 disclosures
on analyst forecast characteristics and highlight the idea that lease-related tax effects are an
important consideration for financial analysis and projections. Lease information is one of those
aspects that keep lots of importance because of its impact on the balance sheet of a certain
company; furthermore, when lease information is reported in a proper way and being disclosed
accurately, it is useful in preparing the financial statements by the analysts or the investors.
From the research, it is safe to infer that adequate understanding of tax implications in lease
contracts play a critical role in: The assessment of the company‟s financial statements, The
formulation of the taxation policy, And compliance with the legal provisions.
1.2. Tax benefits for lessors (depreciation, interest).
However what is of concern to lessors is the fact that this is not one sided since issues such as
depreciation and interest tax shields are also applicable. However, it must be noted that
normally, the lessees can be in a position to take in regard to depreciation on the leased items
during the time of lease; which highlights the fact that the lessees ability to pay taxes is reduced
since their taxable income is low. Third, lessee also has the burden of changes in the price of the
leased asset within the period for which it may even influence the cost of the asset hence
Page 10 of 25
profitability while on the part of lessors, they can deduct expenses which are interest expenses on
the amount used to finance the leased asset hence positive tax impacts on profitability. As for
the other criteria, Kim, Tsang, and Wong (2020) analyze the material effects of operational lease
standard changes related to leases that may involve tax foressors. Accounting rules employed in
leasing today are not same as in the past e. g. FASB ASC 842, these changes may have impacts
on lessors in terms of tax management and business models. As for the changes, it is vital for-
lessors to contemplate concerning over these changes and impacts on tax efficiency and therefore
corporate performance. Kanoktao, Nittayagasetwat, and Lim (2021) investigate Lease effect and
accounting performance measurements and solvency with especial attention to the financial
impact and particularly tax shields on lessors. Leasing affects the financial statements of the
lessor by generating rental income which is reported directly to the income statement while
expenses incurred on the leasing activities include allowance for depreciation and interest
expenses which affect the balance sheet, income statement and ratios of the lessor. These
financial advantages include tax shields which is in gross as part of the gross operating profits
and cash flows in operations of lessors. It can be stated that an opportunity to enhance benefits of
lessors through accessing depreciation and interest charges as tax write-off connected to leasing
is described. And this paper recognizes that administrative matters like the modifications to the
lease accounting standards and operating decisions facilitated impact the tax planning strategies
of rs and the resulting repercussions. With regards to the insufficiency of leasing tax
consequences and the associated questions of the efficacy of this type of taxation regulation as
means to generate profits and achieve strategic objectives, it is necessary for lessors to
comprehend the potential of these measures to the maximum level.
Page 11 of 25
1.3. Sale-leaseback transactions and tax considerations
When it comes to its role in both the lessee and the lessor, sale-leaseback transactions may be
beneficial to a company specifically in terms of the consolidation and the ability to minimize
taxes. Sale and leaseback is also called „sale and leaseback transaction and is a contract in which
the lessor sells an asset and immediately leases the same asset from the buyer for some time,
provides many benefits in cash and taxation. The extent of these tax advantages with respect to a
given sale and lease back or the characteristics of the specific sort of sales and lease back can
also impact how much of these tax advantages can be realized by the lessee. By the type of
transaction sale-leaseback lessors gain depreciation deductions on the repurchased asset, renting
and saling properties may increase it‟s tax advantage and financial profitability. Kadous and
Zhou (2022) have reviewed how and to what extent these leases have an influence on firms‟
credit risk with reference to different taxes influencing credit risk emanating from sale and leases
back strategies. For instance in the special case of sale and lease-back transactions credit risk
factors such as changes in selling company financial outlook or changes in its leverage ratios are
taken into consideration. According to this, it would be possible to state that the understanding
of the role of taxes alongside with the overall balance sheet impact of sale and leaseback
transactions becomes crucial for the assessment of creditworthiness and providing sufficient
level of control over financial risk. Lee and Lee (2021) analyse the regulation concerning lease
capitalization and the impact of the regulation on the earnings forecasts provided by analysts,
and also assert that the focus on tax issues should be made while studying and developing lease-
related financial policies or strategies. Lack of consistency of lease accounting standards,
particularly capitalization under ASC 842, can also shift the approach to financial reporting, tax
planning and forecasting of analysts too. Policy issues like those observed in sale-leaseback
Page 12 of 25
transactions represent reality and have real impacts on the conclusion of the financial analyst
regarding the assessment of companies‟ earnings and expectations of their future
performance. S励H estates sale-leaseback agreements afford eros for tax effect to both, the
lessees and lessors based on, to a certain measure, the accordance of sale-leaseback agreement
undertaken. The credibility and efficiency of the financial policies related with leases greatly
depend on the extent of tax aspects looked into while assessing credit risk and the estimated
earnings that influence the general financial situation. There are different types of compliant
structures, which can include entering into sale-leaseback arrangements with the vendor to share
the tax impact of future value adjustments that a buyer may undergo while minimizing the risk of
value shocks that a seller may also encounter.
IV. Lease Analysis and Evaluation
1.1. Lease vs. purchase cost analysis methods
Since it is necessary to analyze the advantages of leasing versus purchasing, several cost
estimation methods are possible to determine which option would be more effective. These
methods include: Payback period: Payback period is also known as the break-even point and is
classed among the traditional methods of investment appraisal alongside the Net Present Value,
the Internal Rate of Return, and the Cost-benefit analysis. This is because each of the methods
provides insights into the financial characteristics and the financial consequences that are
associated with the leasing choices and the purchase options so that more appropriate financial
decisions can be made. Makar, Alam, and Pearson in their publication of 2013 state that
operating and financing lease initiatives may share features of both They explain that lease costs
should not be exchanged but a proper examination of allocable expenses. The dynamic nature of
the lease accounting significantly consists of FASB ASC 842; therefore, cost accounting can
Page 13 of 25
capture lease costs obligations and their total financial and strategic impact worth with respect.
Roden & Mulaveril (2004) provide a useful novice guide for comparing lease and purchase in a
manner that involves the use of a calculator, to help in fairly confident decision-making for
capability. The use of this method removes the tiresome computational assessments of cost,
hence enabling the business to find out which between the two-options of leasing and purchasing
is most suitable. To elaborate more, Nichols and Duke (2021) discuss new lease accounting
standards and indicate at new considerations and predatory possibilities at when transferring
operating lease ideas into new financing type obligations with sufficient coverage to cost
analysis methodologies in managerial decisions. Lease accounting standards, including
capitalization under ASC 842, means that businesses must conduct a thorough application of
leasing obligations, potential taxation strategies, as well as other relevant financial metrics with
the use of better, cost-computational methods. To generate an optimal choice between leasing
and buying, factors such as NPV profile, internal rate of return, Payback Period and total cost-
benefit analysis have to be applied at the right time. The importance of cost: Volume 2 lies in
the capacity to assist in the identification of the cost, risk and benefit for various procedures and
decisions relative to business acquisition therefore helping in exterrate decision making and
planning. Allocation tools and right costing all form another great parts of the global financial
evaluation array.
1.2. Adjusting financial statements for lease capitalization
Lease capitalization consequently involves adjustments to the statement of the financial
positioning to the assets and all liabilities related to lease plans. The operating leases, prior to
the introduction of the lease accounting standards such as FASB ASC 842 or IFRS 16 utilized to
exist as off balance sheet items on the original financial statements, although these altered our
Page 14 of 25
financial ratios, therefore financial reporting. Palea (2020) reviews the consequences of lease
capitalization in compliance with IFRS 16, on the first instance on the accounting performance
measurements, and secondly, on bringing the adjustments when reporting in financial statements
into account. Notably, capitalizing operating leases involves the restatement of financial ratios
common in the leverage ratios, return on asset, and the interest coverage ratios which investors,
creditors and other analysts in applying their assessment of the organizational capacities and
performances in the financial statements. This fact makes it highly important to state that the
evaluation of company‟s financial performance and its position very often directly depends on
the quality and reliability of the financial statements. Nailor and Lennard (2000) and described
the new lease standard and stated that these leases should be managed well to reflect in the
financial statements. Leases are currently known as lease liabilities and a corresponding
recognized asset called lease receivables following the lease capitalization rules that mandate
their presentation in the statements of financial position. This involves presenting changes in the
format of Financial Statements, Notes and accounting standards to produce the next best view of
financial position and contingencies of a business organization. In the case of the key factors of
financial and managerial accounting, Needles Jr, Powers, and Crosson (2008) provide specifics
on important practices regarding the revisions necessary in a company‟s financial statements
most especially concerning lease capitalization analyses and necessary conformity with the
related national accounting standards. While recognizing leases financially, leases have to be
reported in terms of liabilities and assets Financial Accounting and managerial accounting on the
other hand deals with the evaluation and the usage of those reported figures in decision making
as well as managing the company‟s lease and other financial obligations. Lease capitalization
Page 15 of 25
entails a change in most aspects of accounting statements and policies, in a way that all the
leased assets and liabilities are recognized.
1.3. Credit analysis and lease commitments assessment
Another helpful tool in the general credit analysis is arguably one of the most effective in general
evaluation of the firm‟s place in the financial world and able to fulfil its fixed costs, such as
rents. This means that what needs to be reconsidered includes aspects like cost of leases, terms,
and GICs and the effect they have on aspects like liquidity and the rate of certain aspects that
some of these factors influence. According to some literatures, credit analysis has been
confirmed to play significant role in lease choices The consideration of the literatures in this
paper provides an historical background on how credit analysis is a significant aspect of lease
choices. Their article “Financial reporting and analysis” (2011) shows that credit analysis often
features when evaluating lease commitments as per the consolidated statements. This involves
the determination with the help of the analysis of the financial statements and the decision
making of the probable future cash revenues and the ability of the firm to meet its leasing
obligations as it meets any other contractual obligations. As for the other evaluation in respect
of the leases has been viewed by Reither (1998) in credit analysis of the other evaluation with
reference to leases & evaluation of commitment leases. This performance assessment involves
preparation of some balance sheets, project cash-flow scenario, flexibility to meet all the lease
commitments besides being able to prove credit worthiness to fulfill all the lease obligations. In
relation to Murphy (1953), this work attempts to discuss and illustrate leasing on the basis of its
case analysis; Included among the features of leasing that deserve attention is the credit
worthiness aspect of lease agreements. This paper provide information about the historical
outline of lease analysis in the lease decision making process and the new criteria that
Page 16 of 25
acknowledged the credit reliability of the lessee. Credit analysis still serves as one of the most
acceptable approaches in assessing concepts such as lease commitments and the likelihood of the
company‟s ability to meet the obligation on lease. It will include the assessment of the lease
agreement and its conditions, payment approaches, cash management and financial restructuring
standards which are related to credit proposal and solvency of the enterprise. Hopefully, this
should have offered adequate information on practical credit analysis as to warrant their
inclusion as part of the leasing criterion where there is likely hood of credits risks to come up.
V. Lease Financing Strategies
1.1. Equipment leasing for asset management.
Leasing of equipment is thus accurate as a strategic management of assets that avails companies
the following worths; Thecharset OTHER option leasing gives those using the equipment
without necessarily owning the managingcomplicacies. While this model can be very rigid it can
also be rather flexible to a certain point in time for the companies, as it allows them to use and
implement all the latest technologies and equipment that is available in the market without
having to own them. The distinction between operating leases and the amount capitalized as
such and the actual and potential nature of these leases, as stressed by Shah (1998), proves useful
on the grounds of the overall financial and operating value characteristic of equipment leasing.
Operating leases can be capitalized with is advantageous for the absolute stability of the financial
state of the company, also with the managing of assets. In the context of intermediate
accounting principles, Weygandt, Kieso, and Warfield (2011) offered general background and
critical evaluation citing some specific areas such as lease accounting and asset management
programs. It is therefore helpful for businesses involved in equipment leasing and financing to
acquaint itself with the lease accounting rules that apply so as to adhere to the GAAP and
Page 17 of 25
accurately report the leased asset and the related liability on the corporate balance sheet. Bush
(2006) provides a few questions over the lessor conventional model as to whether this update is
needed because of the changes in lease accounting; Taylor (2007) acknowledges numerous and
current debates or theories exist from scholars all over the world relative to the management of
leases as well as the financial reporting. There are modifications that have been made in the
lease accounting standards that can be used for business and owners Lease can thus be prepared
as a tool for lease management to conform with the markets standards and rules and regulation
for compliance. Leasing of equipments is counted to be a good asset management strategies
because it brings boxed flexibility, cost and operational issues. Equipment leasing majorly refers
to the act of using leases as financing tools for acquiring equipments – for either the lessor or the
lessee and this involves different rules of accounting that should help different organizations in
their performance/review and checkbook standards. New and ongoing promulgations/revisions
and modifications in lease management point towards the reality of continuous update and
modification within the remit of leasing business and necessary compliance with the updated
lease accounting rules and recommendations.
1.2. Real estate leasing for operating flexibility
A leasing business is undoubtedly one of the most popular strategies that helps ensure the
company has the necessary freedom of operation regardless of the type of property – commercial
or industrial, for example, offices, stores or production facilities. One of the advantages of
leasing the real estate is, first, companies be flexible of where and how much space they require
and be able to get that in the future and the feeling of ownership is not there hence no feeling of
liabilities. Inensation of Operating Leases and Capitalization or Capitalized Leases: Its Effects
and Relevance: Singh (2012) discuss effects of operating leases and capitalization or capitalized
Page 18 of 25
leases and it‟s relevance in time of financial crises and risk management. There is needed to
navigate in the differences between one type and another of such contracts, manage the real
estate leasing of these companies, their financial positions, and factors that indicate risks. Wong
and Joshi (2015) seemed to fill this gap of knowledge by focusing on the impact of lease
capitalisation on the financial statements and certain key ratios commonly used in the Australian
context. from their studies they assist in shedding light on intelligence on the readiness of
company to establish the impact of capitalization on leases in the real estate leasing sector to
assist organisations to determine the impact of the lease accounting standards on business
performance and reporting. Stuerke (2004) again touched on another example of this kind of
weber and itsrole in accounting economics and the implication of lease accounting standard to
leasing of real estate. From this angle, it will be possible to understand why the selection of
specific lease accounting standards can affect not only the real estate leasing business and leasing
practices and developments, but also on the various corporate management strategies affecting
firms that engage in leasing activities. Practical acumen in the hire acquisition technique reveals
that it is functional practice that delivers organizations the flexibility that is necessary in
fulfilling their operations demands in a way that can also help minimize risks wherever possible.
Companies need to understand the various lease types, lease capitalization and the lease
accounting standards and their implications or impact on business real estate leasing, about how
they can follow or obey the new given rules as well as how meet or observe the current rules are
besides, to make more enabling financial decisions.
1.3. Leveraged leases and structured financing arrangements.
They are not only complex leasing structures that are leasing which is more than mere leasing
and also permit the use of third party funding in the acquisition of the leased property, but they
Page 19 of 25
are further forms of leasing that have the following strategic implications in terms of taxation,
financing and risk sharing. Leveraged lease can be described as a contractual agreement
between the lessor/leasing firm, the lessee/borrowing firm and the lender wherein the equipment
possessed by the lessor/leasing firm which was leased out to the lessee/borrowing firm was
funded by the lender through use of their equity. These structures enable firms to participate in
the acquisition of the large structures without having to generate large amounts of cash, thereby
through the use of the debt to finance asset acquisition while at the same time reaping the
benefits of the flexibility of financing and tax shields. In their further development of this work
in February 2022, Yan, Yang, and Dou have attempted to elaborate on the responsibilities of
institutional investors in relation to operation leases as well as the accounting methods,
portraying the several complexities of business and; the working of the institutional investors‟
decision making process. Ref therefore one must be in a position to have details on factors and
status of the institutional lease participation so that the companies can gain mastery on some of
the complexities of leases and in turn improve on their results on the financial transactions. In
our support, Zhou and Zhai (2021) examine lease accounting decisions – financing and lease
accounts on the Chinese setting. These recommendations concern how different firms may
effectively employ structured financing and leasing accounting to decrease funding of assets
through cash flow enhance the understanding of how firms may optimally balance capital
structure and ultimately, increase performance improving . Other strong business models include
the leveraged leases and structured financing which are some of the powerful tools that holds the
potential for firms to fund the acquisition of the desired assets, manage the overall costs of
financing and in most times, fully harness most of the preferable tax shelters. Hence the view of
the businesses is that it is necessary to get an understanding of three primary areas; the
Page 20 of 25
understanding of the functions of institutional investors, the effects of leasers on economic
statements of firms and the franchise financing structures as well as how such a recording of
finance would enable the business to take advantage of the opportunities that specialized leasing.
Page 21 of 25
6.0 References
Altamuro, J., Johnston, R., Pandit, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Operating leases and operating
leverage: Emerging evidence from the new accounting literature. Review of Accounting
Studies, 19(2), 767-792.
Andres, C., Cumming, D., Karaulova, M., & Kooli, M. (2022). Lease accounting and the cost of
private debt. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102153.
Arcelus, F. J., Mitra, D., & Srinivasan, G. (2005). On the incidence of deferred taxes, intangibles
and their reversal under APB No. 21: An analytical inquiry. Journal of Economics and
Business, 57(2), 199-239.
Beatty, A., Liao, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). The regulation of lease leverage. Journal of Accounting
and Economics, 67(2-3), 191-219.
Bratten, B., Choudhary, P., & Schipper, K. (2013). Evidence that market participants assess
recognized and disclosed items similarly when reliability differs. The Accounting
Review, 88(4), 1179-1210.
Brockman, P., & Turtle, H. J. (2003). A barrier option framework for corporate security
valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(3), 511-529.
Chambers, D. R., Karimullah, U. L., & Wei, X. (2022). The impact of lease accounting on
leverage ratios: Evidence from US public debt markets. European Accounting Review, 1-
32.
Page 22 of 25
Chen, T. K., Folsom, D. M., Paik, G. K., & Tsui, K. (2021). The consequences of reporting
operating leases as financing transactions by a lessee. Journal of Accounting and
Economics, 71(1), 101364.
Durocher, S. (2008). Canadian evidence on the constructive capitalization of operating leases.
Accounting Horizons, 22(3), 227-256.
Eisfeldt, A. L., & Rampini, A. A. (2009). Leasing, ability to repossess, and debt capacity. The
Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1621-1657.
Fülöp, M. T., & Kálmán, I. (2019). The new approach to lease accounting and its tax
implications. Central European Business Review, 8(2), 1-15.
Gavazza, A. (2010). Asset liquidity and financial contracts: Evidence from aircraft leases.
Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 62-84.
Gill, A. (2021). Lease accounting changes: The effect on firm value and operating performance.
Australian Accounting Review, 31(3), 292-308.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate
financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3-73.
Imhoff Jr, E. A., Lipe, R. C., & Wright, D. W. (1991). Operating leases: Impact of constructive
capitalization. Accounting Horizons, 5(1), 51.
Jennings, R., & Marrs, E. F. (2022). Disclosures and analyst forecast properties: Implications of
ASC 842. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73(2-3), 101509.
Page 23 of 25
Kadous, K., & Zhou, F. (2022). The impact of leases on firms' credit risk. Review of Accounting
Studies, 1-31.
Kanoktao, S., Nittayagasetwat, A., & Lim, F. (2021). The impacts of leases on leverage and
performance: Thai evidence. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal,
25(2), 1-13.
Kim, J. B., Tsang, D., & Wong, J. B. (2020). The real effects of lease accounting standard
changes: Evidence from operating decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
69(2-3), 101328.
Lee, Y., Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). Adoption of lease capitalization and analysts' earnings
forecasts. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 18(2), 100313.
Levi, S., & Benjamin, J. J. (2002). Considerations for lessees on the potential impact of lease
accounting conformity between US and international accounting standards. Journal of
Corporate Accounting & Finance, 14(1), 23-40.
Makar, S., Alam, P., & Pearson, M. (2013). Leases: Fraying of the operating/financing lease
distinction. Abacus, 49(2), 151-177.
Murphy, F. H. (1953). Leasing, more and more. Dun's Review and Modern Industry.
Nailor, H. F., & Lennard, A. C. (2000). Leases: Implementation of a new approach. Abacus,
36(1), 28-49.
Needles Jr, B. E., Powers, M., & Crosson, S. V. (2008). Financial and Managerial Accounting.
Cengage Learning.
Page 24 of 25
Nichols, B. M., & Duke, J. C. (2021). Converting operating leases to financing obligations under
the new lease accounting standard. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and
Finance, 16(1), 47-56.
Palea, V. (2020). The effects of lease capitalization under IFRS 16 on key accounting-based
performance indicators. Australian Accounting Review, 30(4), 319-330.
Reither, C. L. (1998). What are the best lease evaluation practices? Illinois Certified Public
Accountant, 60(4), 24-41.
Revsine, L., Collins, D. W., & Kinney Jr, W. R. (2011). Financial reporting and analysis.
Updated ed. Prentice Hall.
Roden, D. M., & Mulaveril, H. V. (2004). Calculator lease vs. purchase: A practical technique
for beginners. Cost Engineering, 46(7), 22-27.
Shah, S. Z. A. (1998). Exploring the latent demand for the capitalized value of operating leases.
Journal of Economics and Business, 50(4), 379-391.
Singh, A. (2012). Capitalized versus operating lease and financial crisis. Journal of Risk Finance,
13(5), 472-488.
Stuerke, P. S. (2004). Considering the economic effects of accounting. Financial Analysts
Journal, 60(6), 30-37.
Taylor, C. R. (2007). Lease accounting changes: Is the legacy lessor model in need of revision?
Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 47-53.
Page 25 of 25
Weygandt, J. J., Kieso, D. E., & Warfield, T. D. (2011). Intermediate accounting (Vol. 2). New
York: Wiley Global Education.
Wong, K., & Joshi, M. (2015). The impact of lease capitalisation on financial statements and key
ratios: Evidence from Australia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal,
9(3), 27-44.
Yan, X., Yang, S., & Dou, Y. (2022). Institutional investors, operating leases, and accounting
choices. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100448.
Zhou, R., & Zhai, D. (2021). The effect of lease accounting choice on equity cost: Evidence from
China. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5827-5859.
