1
Plan for Macro-Level Change
Name
Institution of Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Date
2
Plan for Macro-Level Change
Introduction
When it comes to offering a plan to transform the system within a community,
incorporating research to establish a rational problem-solving plan while listening to the people
in the affected community is necessary. In this essay, the writer will aim to present an
intervention plan for a specific condition that has been identified through previous assignments,
intending to use the competencies of the EPAS generalist behaviours and effective tactics. It will
combine quantitative and qualitative dimensions to understand the condition or situation, provide
detailed conjectures of the specific intervention, and identify the required functions and
personnel to implement the intervention. Furthermore, it will identify political and economic
considerations and justification for particular approaches, as well as define criteria and methods
that will be used for assessing the success of intervention. Last, it will also give a broad
conclusion as to what is anticipated in terms of outcomes from the organizational, policy, and
practice approaches.
Designing and Building Support
Frame for the Condition
Qualitative Statement
The problem to be examined in this scenario is connected with the scarcity of cheap
mental health care services for low-income populace in an urban environment. This is well felt
through hindrances such as lack of funds to pay for the services, stigmatization, and lack of
qualified personnel who are culturally sensitive in handling such issues. Residents report
3
frustration, lack of resources and especially difficulty in accessing mental health services which
is reported to cause detrimental impacts like increased stress, poor physical health, and decrease
in their quality of life.
Quantitative Statement
As earlier established by Halat et al. (2023), nearly 60% of the people living in the
affected poverty-level community have one or more symptoms of mental diseases. Yet,
shockingly, only 25% of these patients are capable of receiving adequate and effective care that
they need. However, this accessibility deficit is regretfully accompanied by a severely limited
number of mental health workers. In the present population structure, a shocking ratio of one
mental health provider is found for every two thousand residents of the community. As a result,
the period that people spend waiting for mental health services has rocketed to an alarming
average of over three months, deepening the problem. The given statistical data creates rather
grim picture of the mental health state within the community. In the current world, most of the
low-income households are struggling to get the necessary mental health treatment due to the
high rates of the disease. This gap reaffirms the need for policies that seek to close the vacuum
created by the demand and supply of mental health services. This is primarily due to the lack of
the necessary number of mental health professionals, which means that more often than not,
people cannot get the help they need in time.
Justification-of-Action Statement
To promote the well-being and productivity of the community, it is important that this
sort of condition be met. The expansion of mental health services means that not only will the
suffering of these people be relieved, but society will also benefit through the prevention and
4
treatment of illness, reduction in medical costs, and decrease in criminal activities while the
academic performance of children also receives a boost (Colizzi et al., 2020). The gains of
intervention from a societal perspective warrant such efforts in the long-term, hence the call for
impactful and sustained efforts.
Working Intervention Hypothesis
A community-level intervention to promote the accessibility of inexpensive and
culturally appropriate mental care should lead to decreased measures of mental health disparity
among the disadvantaged. The intervention increases the chances of the focal population to
access care, decreases the rates of stigma, and increases the quality of life of the focal
population.
Critical Functions and Participants
Developing a roster of critical functions and participants is essential for the successful
implementation of the intervention. The key systems and their representatives include:
Initiator System: Community health organizations and advocacy groups initiating the
intervention.
Change Agent System: Social workers, mental health professionals, and community leaders
driving the change process.
Client System: Low-income residents experiencing mental health issues who will directly
benefit from the intervention.
Support System: Local government, non-profits, and philanthropic organizations providing
financial and logistical support.
5
Controlling System: Policy-makers and regulatory bodies ensuring compliance with legal and
ethical standards.
Host and Implementing System: Local healthcare providers and clinics hosting the new
services and implementing the intervention strategies.
Target System: Broader community, including those indirectly affected by improved mental
health outcomes.
The justification of choosing each system representative is based on the fact that they are
willing to contribute time, skills and resources towards the intervention and are most likely to
directly affect the focal population of interest.
Ensuring Diverse Perspectives
In order to obtain a range of views the intervention plan will target stakeholders through
intersectional diversity of race/ethnicity, age, gender, faith, ally-ship, and politics. An online
questionnaire, and focus group discussion as well as structured interviews will be used in the
community to collect data. These changes enable the intervention to be culturally competent and
not racist while also combating systemic biases.
Strategies and Tactics
Political and Economic Feasibility
For the overall plan of the proposed intervention to be effectively executed, it is
paramount that political as well as economic challenges be analyzed and evaluated
comprehensively. From a political perspective, it is equally important to obtain support from the
local governments, policymakers and other authoritative bodies. This involves responding to
6
managerial requirements, building coalitions, and operating in consonance with macro-policy
goals. In an economic sense, the effort primarily depends on gaining out financial funding from
various sources say grants, philanthropic donations, and developing strategic alliances with non-
governmental organizations and the corporate fraternity. Such resources are crucial for funding
activities to ensure initiatives are maintained both by covering expenses and growing capacity. In
similar past attempts, such hurdles have been overcome with social activism, formation of a
coalition, and pull together the public and private spheres. One explicit example of legislative
input is the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act passed in the United States
(Mulvaney-Day et al., 2019). This law that seeks to address existing inequities in insurance for
mental health care was made realize over social reform campaigns and social inclusion through
participatory processes that bring together stakeholders from different fronts. Through the
concerted lobbying power and pressure from advocacy groups, healthcare providers, insurers, as
well as the political support from different policymakers regardless of their political divides, the
supporters of the Act effectively prevented political stagnation and implemented the Act in 2010.
While there may be contemporary challenges in navigating contemporary impediments, it
is important to look back to historical antecedents for guidance on strategic thinking and
approaches. A pictorial approach that includes ground-up organizing, partner engagement, and
skillful negotiations can directly engage the support of stakeholders and overcome deeply-seated
antagonism. Furthermore, framing the intended message as an imperative economic need, as well
as the positive potential impact the prospective intervention can create, may be influential in
securing standing among various stakeholders, thus fostering unified support and meaningful
action for change (Dwivedi et al., 2021). Taking into consideration both historical experience
and brand-new successful practices aimed at eradicating politico-economic obstacles for change
7
today, it looks more than rather encouraging to consider perspectives of getting closer to
achieving the objectives set by the proposed intervention.
Selected Strategies
The primary plan of action to pursue regarding the intervention is stakeholder
participation in the community. There is improved ownership and commitment among the
participants towards the changes brought about by the intervention, thus improving the
sustainability of the strategy. In order to collaborate, generate impact, and avoid noisy heuristics,
strategies like the ‘booking of taboos’ procedure will not be applied, which means that the
following actions and decisions will not be taken. This has put in place a collaborative strategy to
ensure that the quality of life of the focal population is greatly influenced, as outlined below.
Public policy changes geared towards increased access to mental health services will result in
better mental health, improved productivity and more integration into the community. The above
scenario therefore foreshadows a situation where the community's mental health disparities will
worsen, health costs will be considerably higher, and general well-being will decline where no
action is taken.
Tactics for the Intervention
Two key tactics for the intervention strategy are:
Community Outreach and Education
Community health promotion interventions such as organizing educational forums,
establishment of outreach programs to discount mental illness from the social context while at
the same time educating the community residents about the availability of services and support
8
systems are crucial. Data also prove these strategies can reduce stigma levels and ensure people
are more open to seeking help (Javed et al., 2021). These serve intents to inform the general
public on matters concerning mental health and the resources available to those in need. These
campaigns shift the focus to the patients by making them aware and knowledgeable about the
symptoms of the diseases, available treatments and where to get them. While workshops and
seminars are convenient because they allow people to address and discuss mental health issues
freely in a group (Pappas, n.d.). They provide tips on how one can identify indications of mental
disorders and the role of prevention. These are supported by public awareness campaigns which
seek to employ different methods of reaching a large population of the community through
media, events, and over the internet. They seek to extend to the public, and turn awareness to
mental disorders and make them more acceptable.
These are the goals of eradicating stigma among the target groups of people. MHCSs
respond to this barrier of stigma through modelling appropriate behaviours that encourage users
to seek help, given that many suffer from untreated mental illnesses. The patient and community
education approaches help in eradicating myths, stigma and discrimination to ensure a helpful
environment (Sciences & Education, 2016). They help clients break barriers and get that there is
no need to be embarrassed about seeking help and assistance. Furthermore, these changes are
important as they help in making sure that residents are informed on the various options that are
available to them. Workshops and awareness campaigns raise awareness about available
resources and local mental health services while sharing information can help those struggling
find the help they require. Such measures will help prevent mental disorders from arising and
improve the outcomes of interventions due to timely access to services.
9
Mobile Mental Health Clinics
Mobile clinics focused on mental health facilities are useful and have been implemented
in various places to help increase services in regions with little to no mental health facilities. This
new model is the formation of mobile clinics which provide mental health care right at the
patients’ locations to ensure that all patients who have one form of barrier that prevents them
from accessing conventional transport means due to their physical disabilities, age or other
related factors get the much needed mental health care they require (Lattie et al., 2022). Mobile
clinics act as vehicles through which individuals can receive valuable mental health services
since the clinics' transportation reaches out to the people instead of the people having to travel to
reach the clinics. This strategy has been used before to enhance the progressive health of people's
minds and narrow the gap in the availability of care for the minority. This also coheres with the
general AHP probe findings of developing equal accessibility for key services. Mobile mental
health clinics can also have the following advantages: they accumulate the experience and
knowledge of the professionals, so they can bring the missing mental health services to
communities that need it the most (Carter et al., 2021). This goes a long way in strengthening the
provision of services, while also ensuring that the filial structure aids people to get what they
want as regards treatment. Furthermore, mobile clinics are also capable of targeting the needs of
the populations in which they are serving hence making sure that the actions they take for mental
health are relevant to the culture and the situation.
10
Planning and Implementing
Evaluation Approach
The evaluation method for the proposed intervention will be the outcome-focused type;
this will revolve around the changes in the mental health, the services used by the intervention
subjects and the well-being of the entire community. This approach is consistent with
recommendations for conducting program evaluations and determining goals in which programs
have succeeded and which require modification (Good, 2023).
Practical Issues
It is a necessity to have solid data collection and analysis systems to facilitate an outcome-based
evaluation system (Bhati et al., 2023). Such systems can mean the going out for purchasing
brand new equipment or software and/or the training of the staff that is going to be in charge of
the specific evaluation – costs that are inevitable but necessary.
Political Issues
From the political perspective, the engagement of local government authorities and relevant
stakeholders is indeed essential for the examination’s outcome (Gregory et al., 2020). Awareness
on the part of the intervener is important in describing the goal, process and anticipated effects of
the intervention that will increase support.
11
Ethical Issues
From an ethical perspective, the principles which must be adhered to include privacy and
voluntary participation of the individuals in the evaluation (Atlan, 2023). The evaluation must
also be developed in such a way that it will never be a bias or discriminative in any way, which
is a common practice when it comes to ethical considerations in social work research.
Expected Outcomes
The intervention it proposed is likely to improve the performance across the organizational,
policy and practice frameworks of community care.
Organizational/Community Approach
In an organizational point of view, the envisaged result is increased capacity of the local
health care practitioners in the provision of mental health care. The community organizations
shall improve in their networking, and this will reduce the challenges they face in providing
services, thus improving the service delivery.
Policy Approach
As for the policy intervention, the intervention seeks to affect local and state policies to fund
mental health equally or more than physical health and support low-income individuals.
Sustaining the implementation may act as a reference point to other such societies to push for
policy reforms of a larger context within a state or country (Arundell et al., 2020).
12
Practice Approach
Consequently, promoting mental health for the focal population will, in turn, have improved
service delivery, reduced stigmatization, and preserved quality of life (Shahwan et al., 2022).
Professionals of the field will be provided with valuable practice in participatory and
community-centered treatments, irrelevant interventions.
Conclusion
Creating an intervention plan for targeting lack of mental health services in low-income groups
requires careful research and planning at macro-level involving partnerships and strategies. In so
doing, the condition is described in terms of qualitative and quantitative findings that incorporate
the views of the different participants and feasible approaches and techniques, which the
intervention intends to enhance the overall wellbeing of the target population. In terms of
outcome-based assessment, further policy and practice can be guided as the efficacy of the
intervention will be ascertained. This plan acknowledges that change takes place systemically
and offers a far-reaching initiative for tackling social, racial, economic, and environmental
inequities.
13
References
Arundell, L.-L., Greenwood, H., Baldwin, H., Kotas, E., Smith, S., Trojanowska, K., & Cooper,
C. (2020). Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions,
economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators.JSystematic Reviews,J9(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01333-6
Atlan, T. (2023, November 29). Data Ethics Unveiled: Principles & Frameworks Explored.
Atlan. https://atlan.com/data-ethics-101/
Bhati, D., Deogade, M. S., & Kanyal, D. (2023). Improving Patient Outcomes Through Effective
Hospital Administration: A Comprehensive Review.JCureus,J15(10).
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47731
Carter, H., Araya, R., Anjur, K., Deng, D., & Naslund, J. A. (2021). The emergence of digital
mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances
and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders.JJournal of
Psychiatric Research,J133, 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.016
Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020). Prevention and early intervention in youth
mental health: Is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for
care?JInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems,J14(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V.,
Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R.,
Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the
future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research
14
propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
Good, F. F. (2023, July 10). What are Evaluation Methods? Funding for Good.
https://fundingforgood.org/what-are-evaluation-methods/
Gregory, A. J., Atkins, J. P., Midgley, G., & Hodgson, A. M. (2020). Stakeholder identification
and engagement in problem structuring interventions. European Journal of Operational
Research, 283(1), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.044
Halat, D. H., Soltani, A., Dalli, R., Alsarraj, L., & Malki, A. (2023). Understanding and
Fostering Mental Health and Well-Being among University Faculty: A Narrative
Review.JJournal of Clinical Medicine,J12(13), 4425.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134425
Javed, A., Lee, C., Zakaria, H., Buenaventura, R. D., Cetkovich-Bakmas, M., Duailibi, K., Ng,
B., Ramy, H., Saha, G., Arifeen, S., Elorza, P. M., Ratnasingham, P., & Azeem, M. W.
(2021). Reducing the stigma of mental health disorders with a focus on low- and middle-
income countries.JAsian Journal of Psychiatry,J58(58), 102601.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102601
Lattie, E. G., Stiles-Shields, C., & Graham, A. K. (2022). An overview of and recommendations
for more accessible digital mental health services. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(2), 87–
100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1
Mulvaney-Day, N., Gibbons, B. J., Alikhan, S., & Karakus, M. (2019). Mental Health Parity and
Addiction Equity Act and the use of Outpatient Behavioral Health Services in the United
States, 2005–2016. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S3), S190–S196.
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305023
15
Pappas, S. (n.d.). Group therapy is as effective as individual therapy and more efficient. Here's
how to do it successfully. https://www.apa.org.
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/03/continuing-education-group-therapy
Sciences, B. O. B. C. a. S., & Education, D. O. B. a. S. S. A. (2016, August 3). Approaches to
reducing stigma. Ending Discrimination Against People With Mental and Substance Use
Disorders - NCBI Bookshelf.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK384914/#:~:text=APPROACHES%20AND
%20STRATEGIES-,Education,replacing%20them%20with%20factual%20information.
Shahwan, S., Goh, C. M. J., Tan, G. T. H., Ong, W. J., Chong, S. A., & Subramaniam, M.
(2022). Strategies to Reduce Mental Illness Stigma: Perspectives of People with Lived
Experience and Caregivers.JInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health,J19(3), 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031632
