Surname 1
1
AFR 336 - African Art
Arizona State University
September 20, 2019
Ancient African Civilizations
Introduction
The Interrelation between Civilization and Artistic Production and Cyclical Human
Phenomena
Civilization refers to the cultural refinement of a given community in various aspects
such as their thoughts and actions into a refined state. The process is continuous as the society
changes from time to time. Artistic production on the other side refers to the production of
products by human beings in a visual form for the purpose of communication, expression of
ideas or emotion and may also represent their worldview and it is said to be gradual in nature
from one generation to the other (Visonà et al. 228). According to Visona et al. (229), every
culture undergoes civilization which is a steady and endless in nature bringing changes in the
people’s worldview. The peoples’ culture also uses various artistic productions for various
purposes such as communication, and it is interrelated with civilization as every culture uses
different art to communicate and express ideas or emotion. The cyclical human phenomena mean
that the cultures of the world, as well as human history, is a progressive process that takes unique
and new directions every time and it is interrelated to civilization and artistic production.
Viewed cultural refinement is just one measure of development, civilization can also be
interpreted as a cyclical reconfiguration of the human value system, epistemology and systems of
material production. As Guo observes, the development of civilizations follows nonlinear
trajectories due to the intertwining and self-perpetuating economic, ecological, and spiritual
Surname 2
2
systems that propel human development (Guo 139). This observation suggests that artistic
creation is inextricably woven with the economic and ecological adaptive patterns that sustain a
civilization. When the material substratum undergoes evolution, aesthetic and symbolic systems
quite often self-adjust to safeguard the cultural identity of the civilization in the twilight of its
metamorphosis. The cyclical nature of civilization then entails repetition and renewal, and in this
context, Guo claims that civilization is self-stabilized by its creativity through the
reinterpretation of old meanings in context of new cross-civilizational relations (Guo 157). These
cycles demonstrate that progress is more about dynamic oscillation between two poles: new and
old, than a straight line. This oscillation is accompanied by a rhythm through which art acts a as
vessel of social memory, providing interregnum even through decline or reconstruction (Guo
168). The ability to express meaning through art, therefore, affirms civilization's resilience in the
face of change.
Changes in technology have profound impacts on culture as evidenced in from Richta’s
analysis on social relation during technological revolutions. Changes in technology have
profound impacts on culture as evidenced in from Richta’s analysis on social relation during
technological revolutions. Having sociologists as consultants for film projects seems to indicate
an appreciation of the finer nuances of social interaction. Changes in technology have profound
impacts on culture as evidenced in from Richta’s analysis on social relation during technological
revolutions. The new functions that art can take on during this time include critique as well as
enjoyment. It is this very tension between material advancement versus humanistic values that
the more simplistic functions of art fail to capture. More simplistic functions of art often fail to
capture the tension between material advancement versus humanistic values. Integration of
culture with science is advancement in the civilizing process. It is technology’s civilizing process
Surname 3
3
that incorporates new media or digital aesthetics. As Richta has said, all civilizations have some
measure of technology.
Even though they are intertwined, culture and civilization serve fundamentally different
purposes, the former a mental phenomenon, the latter a physical construction, though mutually
supportive, each process of culture and civilization adds a different rhythm to history. Culture, in
this case, represents the internal content of civilization, the values and ways in which systems of
meaning and creativity are organized (Sakaeva et al, 438). This means civilization gives the
frame in which culture supplies the animated form. Artistic creation exists at the point of this
duality, transforming the totality of experience of a society into permanent images which, in turn,
receive the rhythm of social change (Sakaeva et al, 440). As the expansion of civilization occurs,
the systems of culture that accompany it grow increasingly complex, enabling art to operate in
the capacity of a sensitive measure to the evolving ethical and intellectual climate. When the
cycle of civilization stagnates, it is the vitality of art that is most often the first sign of potential
revival (Sakaeva et al, 441). Thus, the circularity of particular human phenomena can be
interpreted as a dialogue between the firm discipline of spontaneous imagination and the
looseness of structures. In this way, the internal equilibrium of the culture and socio-political
structures of each succeeding civilization is preserved.
Certain cyclical phenomena tend to transcend the context of human civilization. For
example, Gunn et al. suggest that the human condition develops within geo cultural time as an
ever-changing system of linearly conditioned growth (10). In this model, civilization exists
within a planetary metabolism, with its artistic and cultural expressions as adaptive responses to
changes in the environment. As changes in the climate and cycles of nature condition the
material world, they suggest new forms of aesthetics that radically change the way humans
Surname 4
4
situate themselves in nature (Khairullina et al. 2314). The climate change-induced circular crises,
as cycles of crisis, provoke new artistic engagements with questions of sustainability, continuity,
and human vulnerability. Such constraint induced creativity is a manifestation of the
systemically embedded adaptive intelligence cultivated within the cultural system (Gunn et al.
10). Art, as an example of culture, transforms ecological limits into imaginative pleasure, thereby
augmenting the capacity of civilization to ellipse, self-correct, and endure amid environmental
change (Khairullina et al. 2318). In this way, the cyclical movement of civilization is more than
historical; it is also ecological, embracing the profound reciprocity of civilization and the
biosphere that nurtures it.
Yoruba and Fon civilizations
Cultures such as Yoruba and Foni discussed by Visona, et al. (230, 277) have their
development patterns, contributions to the African culture as well as the global culture. Yoruba,
for instance, inhabit the south-western Nigeria and are spread throughout the world due to
civilization and leading to their migration. They have developed various artistic productions such
as pottery, beadwork, weaving, mask making, and metal work. They made most of this art for the
purpose of appeasing their gods as well as for communication purposes. Visonà et al. (233) says
that this culture emanated from the Ile-Ife and the long distance trade with the Portuguese has
made it the most popular culture in West Africa. They settled in the southwest parts of Nigeria
after being pushed by the Fulani people who emerged as their close enemies. Most of its people
are non-muslin, and hence worships numerous gods. They live in groups and cities instead of
small villages. They form the largest ethnolinguistic group in Nigeria and the West Africa region
contributing to about 35 percent of the population. They also contribute to over 40 million of the
entire population of West Africa (Visonà et al. 234) While its majority live in Nigeria, a good
Surname 5
5
percentage of them live in other parts of Africa and the world through the Atlantic trade. Most of
the Caribbean people claim to be Yoruba, and their ways of life reflect the same. Their migration
and settlement in most parts of the world have led to the adoption of their religious beliefs,
values, and norms in all parts of the world where they have settled.
The Fon culture of Benin lives in the various coastal states of West Africa. Their
migration into Benin took place 400 years ago. They thrived through the organization of slave
trade gaining enormous economic gains (Visonà et al. 272). They used the trade’s income to
support their king and their vast kingdom. The collapse of the Fon kingdom was as a result of
conquest by the French in 1894 making leading to the formation of Benin as a colony. Visonà, et
al. (273) adds that the French merchants documented their culture and their cultural artifacts
across that later spread throughout Africa and the entire world through trade. The artifacts are
kept in various Museums around the world, and their migrations have led to the adoption of
some of their cultural values and beliefs.
The example of the Yoruba civilization shows that both political organization and artistic
symbolism evolved mutually to maintain social balance and civic values. Usman and Falola
observe that Yoruba polities before colonialism were built on a system of federated kingship in
which political authority was distributed between councils of elders and advisory councils of
priests (142). This system depicts that the way governance was participatory in nature founded
on moral equilibrium as opposed to hierarchical superiority. This political system had advocated
community decision making and had made it mandatory that leadership was based on divine
harmony as opposed to personal authority. Harmony of this kind placed leadership as a godlike
task, and tied the rulers to both the will of their gods and the common good at once. This system
was manifested in art in royal regalia, palace buildings and ritual objects which represented
Surname 6
6
legitimacy and cosmic order (Abiodun 67). These symbols represented the abstract rules of
justice and balance and incorporated the religious persistence of the political and religious
existence. The visual codes translated the political into art and placed politics inside the moral
aesthetics. Yoruba art was translated to be a teaching tool learning that ethical beauty must be
reflected in power. The Yoruba theory of omoluabi, or moral personhood, was an artistic virtue
connected to political responsibility that enforced collective values using aesthetic language
(Abayomi 9). This relationship made morality visible culture so that the civic virtue is a living
and a performative ideal. This system exposes the concept of governance as not domination but
as an aesthetic form whereby the expression of aesthetics cemented moral and ethical
accountability and citizenship.
The concepts of religion and cosmology in the life of the Yoruba people demonstrate a
high level of insight of human fate that is connected with the divine communication. According
to Enaikele and Adeleke, the Ifa system is a divinatory science and a philosophical system used
to explain human purpose (7). This duality is a mirror image of the Yoruba philosophy of the
human knowledge that should always reconcile intuition with the cosmic order. The system
illustrates the Yoruba belief that knowledge is the result of a conversation between the man and
the metaphysical, and intermediated by ritual art and oral poetry. This mediation makes the
cultural belief that the creativity is epistemic and sacred. Ifa corpus is a dynamic library of ethics,
history, and metaphysics delivered in the form of symbolic performance, rhythm of the language
(Jegede 36). These aspects turn the intangible to the tangible as it gives the participants the
ability to involve knowledge in an interaction of sensory and spiritual nature. This creative act of
expression of knowledge turns knowledge into spiritual discipline and it teaches that making out
creative acts are already divine acts of involvement in cosmic order (Okewande 18). This value
Surname 7
7
brings artistic practice into something of worship, combining the intellectual and the sacred in
one cultural process. In this operation, the Yoruba civilization expresses an aesthetic
epistemology where the beauty and wisdom are in identity, and the power of imagination has the
civilizing effect to explain human destiny.
Aesthetics and cultural philosophy are also the features of linguistic and performative
sophistication of Yoruba art. According to Abiodun, the art of the Yoruba people cannot be
perceived outside the language because the visual form and verbal performance convey one
communicative logic (73). This association indicates that words and images are parallel channels
of truth according to the Yoruba thinking. This synthesis brings out a civilization which thinks of
art as a way of reasoning and not decoration. It provides evidence that art can be as intellectual
as philosophy. The visual metaphors (masks, sculptures and textiles) introduce the rules of
balance, respect, and harmonious coexistence. These are artistic expressions of moral values in
material language that anyone in the community can read. Prominence of performative art like
masquerades in art puts audience and aesthetic experience together and ritual is incorporated in
participatory knowledge (Willis 88). This participatory nature reconfirms the point that
according to the Yoruba culture, learning is communal and experience-based. This stage
performance emphasizes the Yoruba concern with art as social expression as opposed to
individualism. With such joint artistry this Yoruba creativity is pedagogy and celebration. Such
forms of artplace beauty in morality in the Yoruba society transforming creativity into a publicly
ethical practice (Abiodun 81). This incorporation of virtue and aesthetics enhances the power of
art as a civic institution and a kind of morality guide.
Spirituality in the Fon civilization serves as social order and the historical memory.
Munoz notes that the existence of Fon spiritual traditions like Vodun in the Caribbean and
Surname 8
8
especially in Cuba reflects their flexibility in geography and centuries (195). This survivorship
highlights the fact that Fon people could preserve their religious integrity in the face of
displacement and dismemberment. This continuity is a confirmation of the Fon people that they
can maintain cosmology of the worldview by ritual and art despite displacement. Their artistic
activities had transformed into remembrance mechanisms that opposed erasure in history. Fon
religion involves relational systems in which gods, ancestors, and natural forces make up a
sensible metaphysical network (Peel 114). This interrelational framework brings out a
perspective of the world where god and human beings have joint responsibilities. Every kind of
art, such as wooden carvings to ritual dancing, asserted communication in this divine ecology. In
this regard, art can be understood as the language of reverence, a process of making
cosmological complexity readily comprehensible in the symbols that are readily available. Using
theology as a tool, the Fon people made the living archive of spiritual identity to oppose colonial
interference (Munoz 198). These creative persistence bear witness to the adaptive and intact
nature of the African spiritual thought. The strength of their unity, art, becomes a means of their
culture and cultural survival and communication with the cosmos.
A profound scientific and cosmological awareness, and, importantly, ethno-astronomy is
also present in the Yoruba worldview. Segla describes how the Yoruba explanation of the sky
links the systems of heaven to the gods and forms a cosmological science, which links
observation and spirituality (1054). This integration brings together the empirical consciousness
and theological fantasy, breaking any strict line between religion and science. This combination
of astronomy and religion highlights how there should be unity of knowledge in the Yoruba
mentality where the scientific awareness is transformed into sacred knowledge. In this
perspective, when one studies the heavens he is also engaging in God revelation. The
Surname 9
9
astronomical calculations of both the stars and seasons guided the agricultural cycles, the
calendar of rituals and social gatherings and human activity became in tandem with the celestial
patterns (Segla 1056). These balances made sure that every day life reflected the perfection of
the universe. These practices demonstrate how Yoruba was accommodating empirical
knowledge on the symbolic system that governed art and morals. This assimilation proves that
moral education could not exist apart of intellectual pursuit. These cosmological systems made
the society perceive art as an expression of the general order, the natural cycles being converted
into art (Okewande 20). The creation of art, therefore, became a visual theology of universal
unity. The Yoruba, therefore, bring out the fusion of scientific interest and religious imagination
to give rise to holistic civilization based on the balance with the universe.
At the Fon, art and kingship were intertwined, which demonstrates that visual culture
justified authority and recounted the history of people. According to Peel, the leaders of the
Dahomey kingdom used grand rituals and artistic commissions to establish divine approval and
political survival (117). A combination of authority and beauty meant that the governance was
meant to be just as spiritual as it was aesthetic. Such artistic creations as banners with royal
applique and sculptures in the palaces encoded the stories of dynasties and a heavenly order.
They made the court into a historical theatrical stage. Fon artisans then took the political power
beyond the sight of the eye and into an aesthetic form of visualism and reverence. By so doing,
they made certain that virtue, rather than dominance, was put across by statecraft. The religion
and political integration was further solidifying the society, as royal art consisted of the
protective role of spirituality and the role of historical recollection (Munoz 199). Such a
combination of sacred with civic imagery formed a symbolic agreement on leadership. These
symbolic images enabled the royal family to adopt the cosmic stability, and the rule of the
Surname 10
10
human way to the divine (Peel 120). This identification made political power a divine mandate
and not authority. Such artistic concept of kingship shows that Fon civilization regarded art as
mediator between metaphysics and power necessary to make political legitimacy manifested in
aesthetic perfection.
The dialogic relationship between the native system and foreign influences is observed in
the Yoruba civilization, as well. Usman and Falola note that the external interactions such as
trans-Saharan trade and European colonial experiences redefined the Yoruba identity yet
maintaining fundamental cosmological values (227). This dynamism divulges a long term
civilizational logic that transforms change to continuity. This elasticity of the past shows a
civilizational certainty that would be able to absorb novel notions without cultural break-up. This
transparency made the Yoruba a living culture. The experienced syncretism in art and ritual with
the introduction to Christianity and Islam, in particular, led to innovative syncretism as Yoruba
shapes took on foreign motives, but the Yoruba remained symbolic (Peel 142). This mixture is
just an example of the ability of the civilization to recreate, and not put its traditions aside. Such
intercultural negotiation converted the Yoruba civilization into a living laboratory of cultural
negotiation. The process also ratified the African intellectual agency in the cultural exchange in
the world. Moral integrity was preserved by the continuance of traditional ethics such as
omoluabi which made it the basis of adaptation (Abayomi 14). This ethical permanency brought
assurance in any change. The synthesis ability of the Yoruba therefore demonstrates the open-
ended civilization that does not resist but rather develops and is developed through dialogue, and
as such, cultural exchange is switched to aesthetic enrichment.
The evidence of a profound ability to transform, in its turn, is the trait of Fon civilization
as the one with diaspora and syncretism. Munoz documents that the Fon and Yoruba traditions
Surname 11
11
fused in the Caribbean creating new religious practices like Santeria and Candomble that kept
African religiosity alive in exile (196). The fusion proves the metaphysical continuity of African
metaphysics over the colonial and linguistic borders. Through ritual and artistic reinvention, such
diasporic adaptations show the way the sacred memory is moving. This transmission then
maintains identity through forced migration. Fon artistic symbols were used as identity and
moral continuum delivery vehicles in the colonial and postcolonial context (Peel 121). These
indicators expressed communal unity during the evasion of culture. They have survived showing
that art may be turned into a source of political opposition and self-expression in the face of
oppression (Munoz 197). Fon art made suffering a language of empowerment through this
artistic endurance. Fon cosmology, which revolved around the interdependent relationship
between the divine and human realms was a strong foundation in the rebuilding of a life together
among peoples overseas. This philosophy made the diasporic communities be in a position to
maintain moral and social order even outside the geography. By aesthetic redefining, Fon
restructured the displacement into renewal and loss into perseverance and exile into its
civilizational continuity.
The long-standing philosophical friendship between civilizations of Yoruba and Fon is
based on the common way they looked at art as an agent of life that unites the spiritual, moral,
and material worlds. Ojaide notes that the African folklore serves the function of storing the
knowledge about the local people so that, through the narratives, symbols and routines, the
knowledge of the survival and community morals are captured in stories (173). This proves that
the creativity was internalized in both cultures to transmit memory and virtue. It is a folkloric
continuum that unites both cultures with the help of oral art that maintains identity over both
time and place. It maintains an ecological morality in which art preserves the being. Art in both
Surname 12
12
Yoruba and Fon cultures is not autonomous but dialogical, and involves community, Nature and
divinity. Creativity is a communicative act and not a solitary act. According to Willis, Yoruba
masquerades are an excellent illustration of such group creativity in which performance is united
with family and morality teaching (94). These performances are an example of the moral
pedagogy of the aesthetic manifestation. Fon ritual art similarly performs social memory,
cosmological revitalization and connects aesthetics to moral philosophy (Peel 125). This
connection unveils the idea of art as the core of common knowledge. Collectively, these
civilizations indicate that art is the conscience of civilization always reviving the values that
render human dignity and cultural survival.
Intertwined Relationship Between Religion, Art and Preservation and Production of
Knowledge
Religion, art and preservation and production of knowledge have a long interconnected
history in East Africa. According to Belcher (2), most of the past of East Africa is recovered
mostly through oral sources. The greatest relationship is that religion and art are the unique
creation of human imagination that is conceived in the brain and it portrays the person’s
imagination of the past and the projection of the future. Human brain generates various reality
fantasies that supplement the factual realities whenever the reality eludes explanations (Belcher
3). Another relationship is that both art and religion have a deep connection with the brain stem
centers of human emotion in the quest of expressing and finding emotionally satisfactory
justifications for human existence. The other relationship is that both art and religion need
intellectual and physical human skills in their creation. The two give human being’s life beauty
and purpose beyond absolute survival. Belcher (9) suggests that societies in East Africa have
combined artistic expression with religious practices and their preservation is based on oral
Surname 13
13
tradition as well as modern forms. The production of art by one generation to the other is based
on the oral sources passed by word of mouth by elders. It, therefore, means that the survival and
production of art and religion are vested on its oral preservation and passage from one generation
to the other.
Religion and art are based on various aspects such as knowing and the acquisition of
knowledge, its dissemination, and production including learning and teaching, science and
education as well as feeling, comprehension, experience, familiarity, and perception (Hale 21).
For art and religion to come into existence, there should be the divine act of production which is
fundamentally based on the preserved knowledge. It is interesting to know that the seeking of
knowledge in various traditions in East Africa about art is obligatory as it forms the heart of most
of the societies in the region. Hale (58) adds that in Islam it is believed that art is made an act of
knowledge before it becomes a feeling due to their emphasis on prophetic traditions and Qur’an.
Art and the production of knowledge and preservation are equally applicable in most parts of
East Africa.
The delicate relationship of scholarship and religion in East Africa demonstrates an
ongoing process of constructive synthesis in which belief stands as an impetus for inquiry.
Abdullah points out that in Islamic societies, religious thought has been understood as a unifying
paradigm in which science, ethics, and art perform integrative roles (178). This connection itself
breaks the notion that faith and reason are in conflict. Rather, it shows that sacred worldviews are
capable of generating reasoning systems that are both spiritually and empirically inquisitive.
Hence, the knowledge produced goes beyond the academic to include aesthetic and ritualistic
expressions which are instilled with divine order (Abdullah 189). These artistic expressions of
knowing transform knowledge to an act of worship, thus, spiritualizing epistemology.
Surname 14
14
Knowledge made in the intermediary space of religion and science is, as Grieser notes, a fusion
of symbolic and analytic processes which expands perception (238). This means that the East
African art traditions, whose impetus is religion, enhance the ability to think in different ways by
synthesizing revelation and observation. In so doing, religion is transformed from a passive
teachings system to an active model of thought and artistic world interpretation (Abdullah 193).
The artwork in churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples functioning as visual
theology which translates theology into the visual and the perceivable. Meyer notes the artwork
in religious contexts does not only illustrate belief, but rather organizes the manner in which
believers engage with transcendence (336). This quote shines a light on the epistemic role of
artwork more so as a conduit for making the abstract notion of spirituality accessible in social
discourses. The making of paintings and statues of the holy serves the communities the ability to
navigate the abstract domains of belief and faith through the Latourian notion of “praxes” (420).
In Expressive Arts, spirituality is evoked through the artwork and “knowable” via the senses of
sight, touch, and movement. In the Islamic worldview, art is controlled by theology, and the
“pleasurable sight” positions the spirit so sith and Shaw adds awareness of the 54). This balance
serves to ensure that the sight serves to the contemplation of the object not a distraction. Thus,
the Shih leads to the conclusion that through spiritual devotion the artist becomes the creator.
The devout and prosaic aspects of faith become one practice of seeing and knowing.
In most East African societies, production of art serves as a venue for blending science
and spirituality. Shefer-Mossensohn describes the production of knowledge in some historical
Islamic territories as dependent on a web of scholarly culture imagination networks (64). This
suggests that within empirically driven philosophies of art within religion, the domains of inquiry
and artistic representation developed synchronously. The culture created around the movement
Surname 15
15
of ideas within Africa and the Middle East is one where art was perceived as holding scientific
information, while science was understood to employ aesthetic reasoning (Shefer-Mossensohn
81). This cross-section reveals a civilizational lineage that considered the capturing of
imagination and creative deduction as a viable mode of inquiry. Latour further posits that
religion and art converge because both are iconophilic regarding the essence of truth, in that
images create relationships and do not fix meanings (422). This suggests that artistic work is not
merely decorative but serves a purpose for the society in question in expanding the bounds of
what is possible to know. The artistic and scientific dimensions of religion become, thus,
mutually reinforcing, as they allow societies to visualize knowledge and sanctify discovery
(Shefer-Mossensohn 96).
As Alivizatou points out, preservation of the religious and artistic heritage requires not
only memory but a different innovation to the ways in which knowledge is transferred.
Therefore, the preservation of intangible heritage such as rituals, music and oral art is alway
unlike physical items that embody the collective wisdom of a people (77). This understanding
underscores how preservation is about engagement with performance and the community.
Besides, as Stylianou-Lambert et al. point out, museums are transforming into active centers of
cultural perpetuation that weave disparate cultural elements into a seamless public information
tapestry (571). This shows how preservation at the institution can extend the boundaries of
religious custodianship. It is Kagan who has pointed out that the culturally sustainable systems
are those in which creative activities are recognized as a regenerative social power that integrates
ethics with ecology (93). This suggests that in his view, preservation is an ethical issue, implying
that art contributes to the equilibrium of the world. All the views articulated above illustrate the
need for preservation of sacred art in East Africa to go beyond the past; it must also foster
Surname 16
16
intergenerational creativity that sustains the relationship between knowledge and faith
(Alivizatou 81).
The relationship between art and religion can be examined through the lens of both
sustenance and sustainability. Kagan claims that by visualizing complexity and adaptive
imagination, art can inspire sustainable ways of thinking (101). This notion illustrates the extent
to which creative thinking can foster ethical and ecological regeneration. In the case of African
spiritualities, such conceptualizations parallel the theological proposition that creation itself is an
ongoing, collaborative, and participatory event (Abdullah 195). The creative individual becomes
a co-creator within the divine workings and processes, affirming the tradition that human care
and responsibility is not confined to the natural world, but also the cultural. TallBear adds to this
by suggesting that indigenous cosmologies radically soften the boundaries between life and
nonlife, thus moving away from an anthropocentric view of creation (184). This interpretation
suggests that through sacred art, this broader notion of kinship is visible, representing all beings
as part of an unbroken continuum. In a related observation, Meyer argues that visual religious
expressions often contain, in a sense, eco-ethical imperatives, transducing a metaphysical
equilibrium of sorts to sensate form (352). These intersections articulate that faith-inspired art
engages with existence in ways that goes beyond illustrating theology, but in ways that fosters
existence of sustainable life systems.
Reflective philosophical thinking enables religious art to move between revelation and
rationality. As Buber points out, a deep religious experience occurs in the dialogic between the
human and the divine, where art can function as an encounter and not as a doctrine (118). This
means that the sacred creative imagination changes metaphysics into relationship. In a
complementary fashion, Latour states that both scientific models and religious icons attempt to
Surname 17
17
make visible the invisible through a symbolic frame (428). This relationship reveals an invisible
commonality between wanting to make the ungraspable more graspable and, thus, more
accessible. As Shaw describes it, Islamic art does this through a form of abstraction, through
geometry and calligraphy, aimed at evoking transcendence rather than imitation (79). This form
of abstraction teaches that representation, rather than leading to contemplation, does not lead to
idolatry. Grieser argues that the relationship and the formation of knowledge between religion
and science requires an aesthetic openness through which multiple ways of perceiving reality are
possible (241). In these aspects, the act of creating art becomes a form of spiritual practice. It
enables the exercising of the balance between the mystery of faith and the mystery of the light of
the reason.
The connection of religion to art and science also shows how collective creativity serves
as a mechanism of social thinking. In a specific example of epistemological criticism, the author
notes that the generation of knowledge is not simply a function of mental work, but it is a social
and cultural system that signifies in and through social systems (Machlup 42). This implies that
knowledge is created and licensed through boundaries wider than those of institutions. In his
work, Latour mentions that arts and science have in common the use of visualization to make the
invisible visible and to communicate it (430). This results in a shared perception ground in which
perception serves as a means of revelation. As Grieser observes, the religion and science
boundaries are, at times, indistinguishable, giving birth to hybrid knowledges that are both
evidential and metaphorical (239). This shows that in Eastern Africa, the religious cultural
production is not just artistic, but also conceptual experimentation. Abdullah broadens this view
when he notes that the Islamic intellectual tradition in Africa has regarded the aesthetic and the
scientific as creative parallel approaches to the ultimate divine reality (183). This model
Surname 18
18
emphasizes the civilization approach, in which the creative process inspired by religious faith is
underlying the knowledge structure, as worked out devotionally, rationally, and artistically in
one uninterrupted spiral of revelation.
The communal safeguarding of ethics and social identity through religion and art in East
African culture is immensely significant. Meyer states that sacred images and rituals shape moral
imagination by embodying the emotional structures through which societies define virtue (348).
This implies that some forms of art embody moral education, instructing methods of behavior by
means of sensory experience. In such instances, Buber states that art becomes dialogical (126).
This means, according to him, that an aesthetic experience could become a moral reflection
wherein morality is an outcome of consciousness. This ethics awareness is in contrast to the
social order. In the same vein, Shaw argues that within the Islamic moral vision of art and,
indeed life, the proportions of design, and rhythmic balance of forms within a composition, as
well as the arrangement of images, embodies visual harmony within ethical order (112). Buber
states that a responsibility meets an expectation, and within this interaction, within this
expectation, is a divine anticipation of social order. Alivizatou argues and emphasizes strongly
the importance of rituals which serve as repositories of the communal values, and which become,
in a sense, the vessels that transmit these values for posterity (88). Therefore, religion and art, in
an integrative sense, form the moral consciousness and social order in the East African culture.
Integrating artistic knowledge into economic activities and educational systems is yet
another facet of religion's purpose toward achieving cultural sustainability. As Machlup
observes, knowledge production is economically robust when it is anchored in cultural ingenuity
and innovation (103). This link demonstrates sacred arts as spiritual and material capital
simultaneously. Stylianou-Lambert et al. contend that culturally sustainable policy recognized
Surname 19
19
heritage industries as living systems, rather than stagnant ecosystems (573). This interpretation
of preservation as dynamic and engaged participation in cultural renewal is rather novel. Kagan
further adds that artistic ingenuity nurtures learning in the community enabling it to absorb new
social and environmental realities (121). This perspective regards religious art as a tool for
resilience rather than nostalgia. Abdullah has also noted that spiritual discernment of science and
economic development restores harmony between moral purpose and tangible progress (198).
All these angles suggest that faith driven creativity in East Africa as an intersection of cultural
continuity and innovation sustains civilization.
Museums and cultural institutions continue to mediate the intersections of religion, art,
and collective memory. Alivizatou notes that contemporary museum practices now emphasize
the living nature of legacy by engaging source communities in curatorial processes (92). This
paradigm shift transforms preservation into collaboration and strengthens local agency.
Stylianou-Lambert et al. further highlight that cultural institutions function as social venues
where religious objects attain new value through interpretation, teaching, and learning (575).
This observation demonstrates how museums prolong the life of sacred practices beyond the
confines of ritual. As Meyer notes, these visual settings foster spiritual contemplation by
allowing people to encounter transcendence through art (357). This scenario exemplifies the
ability of public culture to develop contemplative awareness. Shaw also insists that curators of
Islamic art in secular settings must achieve a balance between the artistic display and the sacred
meaning of the work (131). These changing practices indicate that contemporary preservation is
no longer seen as strictly archival, but as a dialogue that fosters religious art without losing the
spirit of inquiry and devotion.
Surname 20
20
Art, religion and science during the Anthropocene and the immediate aftermath also
require a rethinking of our imaginative custodianship. Aloi argues that modern ecological art
needs religious aesthetics to settle the ecological crisis, synthesis of praise and critique (164).
This shows how sacred elements can guide ecological consciousness. Kagan relates such
imagination to a culture of complexity where art exists in the interface of environmental systems
and ethical vision (133). His point suggests that the work of preserving the environment is as
much a spiritual endeavor as it is scientific. TallBear extends the preservation argument by
reconceptualizing it through indigenous viewpoints that see life and nonlife as a web, thus
dismantling the gap between human and nonhuman agency (186). This understanding engages
religious ethics with the planetary interface. Moreover, Abdullah notes how the merger of faith
with ecological understanding leads to an ethically charged science based on care and
custodianship (201). All these indicate the sustaining and ethically life-affirming character of
sacred art.
The fusions of religion, art, and knowledge construction validate the human ability to
envision and re-envision the sacred as a living reality. Buber argues that genuine religiousness is
relational and therefore, through artistic creation, one can concretize dialogue between the
human and divine (131). This perspective frames creation as a continuous revelation rather than
a belief frozen in time. Latour supports this perspective when he claims that both art and science
engage in mediating activities that perpetually reconstruct a shared understanding of truth (439).
This reconstruction indicates civilization’s reliance on symbolic creation to provide meaning; on
the other hand, Meyer notes that the religious’s artwork’s visual language constitutes the
transcendence of the social in a manner that ethnographically keeps the awareness of the Spirit
within civilization (359). This means that through social visibility and participation, belief
Surname 21
21
becomes a part of a collective rhythm. When faith-inspired knowledge, Abdullah argues,
synthesizes the aesthetic and the rational, it nurtures a vision of progress that is anchored in
compassion and imagination, and which is integrative and holistic (203). These perspectives, in a
way, suggest that religion, art, and knowledge construction, help preserve the most important
part of a civilization: the ever creation of meaning.
The Major Argument in the film “Black Athena.”
The main argument of Bernal in the film Black Athena is that the Greek culture was
misinterpreted to be Indo-European in nature while in reality, it is widely Semitic or African.
The explanation given by Bernal is that the existing history has been revised from the original
version to flush the contribution of African civilization to the Greek culture. It is contended that
anti-Africa and anti-Semitic sentiments during the 1700s resulted in the elimination of the two
cultures from the historical establishment. The prove that Bernal provides for his thesis makes
me agree with his hypothesis. He shows the distinctive links such as the borrowing of religion by
the Greek from the civilizations of Egypt. For instance, he provides a connection between the
Cretan Bull Cult among the Minos and further provides a link between Min, the Egyptian god,
and the Minotaur that always needed bovine sacrifices.
Watching the film made me think differently about the African civilization, the ancient
Greece, and its continuity. On the African civilization, it made me think that the ancient African
civilization was sophisticated and more organized to the point of being adopted in Greece. The
influence that ancient African civilization has on the Greek society through cultural diffusion
accounts for the major achievements in Greece today (Bernal). The religion and religious beliefs
in Greece seem to have been majorly built on the African culture. It also shows that Greece’s
continued success in geometry and mathematics is based on the ancient African civilization since
Surname 22
22
most of its artistic productions are based on African art. The arts also prove that the Greek
civilization was not entirely shaped and influenced by the Indo-European settlers’ but the ancient
African civilization. The acceptance of Bernal’s hypothesis that Greece thrives more on
Phoenician and Egyptian influence prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Black Athena by Bernal is a challenge to Eurocentric historiography that reveals the way
cultural narrative creates the moral identity of civilizations. As Lefkowitz and Rogers admit, the
thesis that Bernal proposes discursively disturbs the long-established scholarly preconceptions
because of her attempts to apply to the origins of Greek intellectual traditions the roots of
African and Semitic cultures (25). This has triggered a reconsideration of the processes of
knowledge production and legitimization of historical knowledge. Meighoo views this revision
as an ethical action since breaking the Western historical dominance opens the potential of
pluralistic enlightenment to human progress (74). His understanding indicates that decolonizing
history is not only the process of obtaining facts but also of reorganizing world self-
consciousness. Field also notes that the African literature and classical studies show that
reinterpretations promote cross-cultural literacy and cross-cultural recognition (79). This
relationship makes history a dialogical field and not an array of roots. Fraser goes a step further
to opine that Black Athena revives the lineage of philosophical rationalism in the Greek tradition
but reconnects to African spirituality (56). The outcome is an intellectual reconciliation in which
Africa has permanently played its part in the search of meaning of man curbing the study of
classics into an inclusive human science.
The revision of classical roots in the argument made by Bernal also faces the symbolic
whiteness within the Western historiography. According to Kompatsiaris, racialized images of
the African continent are regularly recreated in Greek popular media and it is being used to
Surname 23
23
experience European exceptionalism by creating a cultural other according to the criticism (362).
These representations show cultural power as having mostly been sustained through visual and
narrative exclusion. Lefkowitz and Rogers argue that such distortions continue to exist since the
modern historiography inherited the racial inequalities imposed by the enlightenment that viewed
civilization as whiteness (48). This bias in history, besides marginalizing African input, also
restricted the breadth of knowledge. Haley believes that Black feminist scholarship is reclaiming
back the classical canon by restoring the erased contributions of African women and their
intellectual agency (31). Her work inverts recovery into resistance, reinstalling the aspect of
culture memory of intersection. Meighoo reinforces that by demolishing the racial
epistemologies, she demonstrates that the West relies on African sources as a source of its
identity (92). What we see in these readings is that Black Athena is a film that is not merely
about historical correction, but also it is a film, in some way, taking on the project of
philosophically intervening in the morality of seeing and remembering.
The hypothesis of Bernal is enriched by the concept of cultural sustainability and
collective memory. According to Stylianou-Lambert et al., museums and heritage organizations
need to acknowledge oppressed history as a part of cultural sustainability on the global level
(568). Their discussion highlights that it is morally important that institutions can reinstate
multiplicity in historical accounts. Field also writes that reinterpretation of the African classics
continues into a living dialogue, which maintains the relevance of the past to the cultural identity
of the present (87). This perpetuation makes heritage a creative survival mechanism and not a
form of rigid commemoration. Lefkowitz and Rogers also say that the recognition of the African
grid in the classical thought gives back life to the Western civilisation since it establishes it on
the common human experience (61). Their understanding does not see influence as
Surname 24
24
appropriation, but as interdependence. Another person, Aloi, continues the idea with saying that
plotting art reinterpretation, as well as natural history itself, develops in according cycles of
reinvigoration and moral adjustment (172). In this way, Black Athena may be interpreted as
cultural ecological gesture, saving intellectual biodiversity in opposition to Eurocentric
monoculture.
The reproach on historical purity in Black Athena is familiar to postcolonial inquiries
about the self and identity retrieval. According to Safvan, postcolonial consciousness is a
narrative inquiry where retrieving the past is crucial in redefining who you were and who you are
(326). His perspective is similar to Bernal, who tries to depict the presence of African
intellectuals in the world story. Fraser understands this healing as a spiritual and philosophical
journey that connects the past investigation with the ethical change (59). This re-membering
retrieves wholeness in civilizations that were disjointed by the colonial thought. Haley asserts
that feminist recuperation of classical texts is the same healing desire by creating marginalization
into empowerment (35). Her style of approach makes reinterpretation a historical correction and
ethical creation. According to Meighoo, the Western monopoly of knowledge is ending, which
leads to the appearance of a genuinely global humanities with the ability of self-criticism (106).
These observations indicate that the film directed by Bernal is engaged in a greater history of
narrative healing, in which the path to cultural and psychological revitalization looks back to the
past.
Philosophically, the project by Bernal prompts the Buberman concept of dialogue
between the finite and the infinite as the essence of true encounter. According to Buber, truth
does not arise in private abstraction; truth arises in relational exchange (119). This dialogic
model is very similar to the approach taken by Bernal, that is, African and Greek civilizations are
Surname 25
25
engaged in the construction of human thought as collaborators. Meighoo notices that this
relationality does not preserve the myth of western isolation because Greece is placed in the
context of an African wisdom tradition (113). The interdependence which he observes as the
basis of civilization is contrasted with competition. Fraser observes that this dialogic approach to
the classical world reformulates scholarship as an ethical dialogue on the identity and reciprocity
(60). This strategy demonstrates that intellectual history should become participatory and many
voices are to be heard in its development. Lefkowitz and Rogers also acknowledge that historical
dialogue reinstates dignity to the subjected members of the past, providing the moral circuit of
cultural exchange a round (78). The approach of Bernal, thus, constitutes a philosophical and not
less a historiographical communion.
The morality of Black Athena is trickled into modern culture politics, in which the issue
of representation is still disputed. Kompatsiaris maintains that the racialized jokes of popular
culture and the nationalistic imagery strengthen the exclusionary discourses of the Black Athena
(369). This association reveals how entertainment can build up historical amnesia. Haley
underlines that the redefinition of classics in terms of Black feminist interpretations turns the
field of representation into the field of resistance, allowing oppressed voices to take the
intellectual field back (37). The cultural production is redefined with a hint of at least political
activism. In his discussion of Afrofuturist cinema, Marks explains how movieland could
juxtapose historical memory in a form of imaginative futures that confront colonial time (118).
This rewriting fits with the cinema style that Bernal applies in integrating both learning and
poetry to reveal repressed lineages. Meighoo finds that by challenging mythic nationalism, such
pieces disclose the weakness of the Western exceptionalism and possibly a new moral geography
Surname 26
26
of culture (122). Combined these attitudes posit that Black Athena can be seen to belong to a
series of artistic and theoretical projects re- building memory as liberation.
An intellectual rebellion manifested through Black Athena, also serves as an artistic act
of restoring which is akin to what Aloi defines as speculative reconstruction in modern art (166).
His concept of art reviving dead or discarded life forms is metaphorically applied in Bernal
trying to revive the forgotten African heritage of Greek civilisation. As Fraser points out, the
recovery of suppressed pasts is a kind of archaeological philosophical digging that unearths the
memory and moral accountability (62). This action demonstrates that recovery of knowledge
involves the emotional, besides intellectual, effort. According to Lefkowitz and Rogers, to
challenge the racial politics of classical scholarship, there is a need to bust the myth of Western
self-origination (91). They agree with Bernal on his historical perspective that history ought to be
perceived as a relational and not as an insular one. Field continues this observation by
demonstrating that the African reworking of Greek texts is a form of imaginative appropriation
that brings forth novel literary and cultural synthesis (83). It is by these views that we came to
realize that the submerged origins recovered, are, in themselves, creative futures, and that history
is made a field of ethical aesthetics and cultural rebirth.
Another conclusion of the work by Bernal is the redefining of civilization as a
conversation and not as a finished heritage. The philosophy of Buber places meaning in self-
other encounter which is in line with Bernal who proposes that Africa and Europe need to
identify with each other (126). This relational vision hypothesizes that knowledge builds due to
humility and sharing. According to Meighoo, Western civilization is not as strong as it is
isolated, but with the ability to revise itself and to talk to non-Western traditions (118). His
understanding of critique turns the criticism into continuity and shows that cultural life is based
Surname 27
27
on openness. Haley notes that this principle of dialogue is reflected in the reinterpretation of the
classical canon into Black feminist interpretation by making exclusion participative (40). This
sort of interaction is a sign of civilized sophistication of a civilization that can recognize its debt.
Lefkowitz and Rogers further contend that such a redefinition of civilization introduces post-
racial attitudes towards antiquity based on cooperation over hierarchy (99). The outcome is a
cosmopolitan structure whereby history is a moral enterprise.
Eurocentrism questioning in the film also makes its way to the questions of materiality
and embodiment. From this perspective, TallBear insists that indigenous and feminist
epistemological interferes with the duality of life and nonlife by showing network relations of
existence that resembles the intertwined culture histories of Greece and Africa (184). This
philosophical ideology denies purity and lays stress on entanglement as the source of creation.
The Anthropocene discussed by Aloi also reveals art as a practices that reveal the artificial
divisions between human and nonhuman histories (175). His observations reflect on the attempts
of Bernal to blur ideological division between civilizations. Fraser notes that recontextualization
refires the organic nature of cultural communication of knowledge, which is in opposition to the
mechanistic analysis of Western progress (61). This renewal permits the ecological vision of
civilization as dependent and active. Meighoo concludes that Eurocentrism can only be tackled
with accepting the hybridity as the natural state of the human culture (128). In these
convergences, there is the Black Athena as historical correction but more importantly also as
ontological restructuring of the meaning of being human.
The ethics of preservation and representation in cultural institutions is also a concern that
can be reflected on by Bernal. According to Stylianou-Lambert et al, museums have a
responsibility of being a place of moral reparation by representing suppressed cultural
Surname 28
28
contributions in their curation (576). Their inclusiveness appeal makes heritage management an
ethical practice. Lefkowitz and Rogers argue that the realization of African contributions to the
classical thought provides renewal to the Western institutions as they are based on sincerity, as
opposed to exclusion (102). This understanding connects the world of academia and general
awareness. Kompatsiaris emphasizes that nationalist mythologies in cultural media can be
supported by selective recollection, and thus curatorial transparency is the key to knowledge
decolonization (372). His observation supports the fact that representation has political
responsibility. Aloi reinforces this by indicating that the institutions of contemporary art should
display history as relative process and not definite narrative (180). These views demonstrate that
heritage preservation is not just a process to preserve the material things, but it is a process of
developing a truthful and multifaceted collective memory with moral integrity that is considered
an ethical vision of Bernal.
The revisionary aesthetics of classical origins embodied in Black Athena can also be
paralleled to the new modernized concepts of cultural remix and narrative multiplicity. Marks
notes that postcolonial cinema and digital media restructure archives through the layers of
memory, imagination and technology into novel epistemic forms (122). The approach is also
similar to the way that Bernal used film as a channel to visually and intellectually reassemble
historical information. According to Fraser, these methods perform a cosmopolitan aesthetics
that is a mixture of an empirical study and a revelation (63). Such a blend enables the audience to
connect with revisionist historiography on the emotional level. According to Haley, creative
media re-membering and reclaiming of classical heritage changes history into existed experience,
not abstracted finiteness (38). It is her wisdom which points to the fact that healing should be
more than just academic. Field goes on to add that the examples of the African arts reinterpreting
Surname 29
29
the classical past show that adaptation can be both continuative and critical (85). In this
perspective, Black Athena has been an experiment in the hybridity of narratives, where visual
narrative is reconstructed with cultural genealogy.
Black Athena can be heard through philosophical resonance of how it is able to make
historical recovery into an ethical encounter. Buber suggests that authentic knowing occurs when
a person encounters the other not as an object but as a presence (133). This principle is what
establishes the moral basis of the project by Bernal that is restoring Africa to dialogic presence
rather than to the objectified absence. Meighoo sees this transformation as the breakdown of the
mythical West, a required incidence of humility in the face of global plurality (131). His
extension indigenizes the termination of Eurocentrism as the onset of intellectually-equality.
According to Fraser, this necessitates a spiritual courage in addressing the erasures of history that
retrieves a common moral legacy of humanity (64). Academic criticism is connected to moral
awakening through such courage. Lefkowitz and Rogers draw the conclusion that the black
Athena with the united Greek and African legacies proves the greatness of civilization is in its
ability to memorize inclusively (115). The film in this way does not merely revise history, it
carries out the moral task of restoring the relationship as the basis of knowledge and art.
African Aesthetics and Global Modernity
The grammar of global modernity has been deeply influenced by African aesthetics
through providing alternative ways of perception and cultural belonging. According to Gikandi,
African visual and performative traditions in the early twentieth century regularly served as
sources of modernist aesthetics, which offered a new language of abstraction and vitality (149).
In his analysis, he shows that the presence of the entire of Africa in modernism was central rather
than marginal. Phillips states that the dissemination of so-called primitive art at this time became
Surname 30
30
a turning point in the history of art around the globe, changing Western conceptions of creativity
and structure (3). This change disputes Eurocentric hierarchies that divided innovation and
indigeneity. Smith goes on to say that in order to rethink modernism, we must recognize the non-
linear and cross-cultural interactions that have given it its shape (12). His statement points out
that even modernity was a creation that was hybrid with the influence of Africa. Meier reinforced
this by demonstrating that Africanist art history has emerged as a field of study exactly as
African artists and concepts have re-constituted the modernist imagination (218). These
understanding intersections disclose that it is the African philosophies of the artistic of rhythm,
embodiment, and community that supply the global modern aesthetic so much of its sense.
The African aesthetic thinking also re-invents modernity as an experience of participation
and spirituality as opposed to an impersonal intellectual quest. According to Mellor and Shilling,
global modernity changes the religious habitus through highlighting the embodied subjectivity
and reflexive awareness (277). African art, according to their analysis, has agglomerative and
spiritual qualities of its performativity and spirituality that foresees contemporary theories of
lived experience. Lamola notes that it is this combination of the spirituality with the self-
consciousness of the creativity that produces African postmodernism non-native, or provides an
ethical critique of Western rationalism (115). Modernity as the dialogue between the tradition
and the innovation is redefined through the lenses of his view. Mathuray argues that, in the
example of African modernism in terms of literature and visual art, subaltern identity is not made
the object of narration in the world but rather its subject-creator (1103). Artistic agency as
resistance is prefigured by this shift. Jaji also shows how the Pan-African musical aesthetics
combine spirituality and political unity to create a soundscape with an embodiment of faith and
Surname 31
31
modernity (98). The strategies help place African aesthetics as a contemporary consciousness
living theory, whereby art cannot be separated with everyday moral and communal life.
The cosmopolitan tendencies of modernism are explained in terms of the impact of
Africa on the international art exchange. According to Siskind, cosmopolitan modernity is based
on the ability to want to be linked outside the local or national localities (15). This idea can be
echoed with Pan-African cultural movements that placed African creativity in a human narrative.
Ferdinand notes that art and mapping co-exist as practices of worldwide fantasy and how
modernity imagines the spatial and cultural association (47). His argument gives special attention
to the geographic and conceptual centrality of Africa in contemporary cartographies of culture.
Kaur and Dave-Mukherji underline that globalization alters the aesthetics into a plural space
where regional practices are oriented in the global meaning of flows (6). Their observation
endorses the fact that African aesthetics make multiplicity not homogeneity sustainable. Meier
also contributes that the acknowledgement of African modernisms in the history of world art has
marked both the starting point of a transnational discourse based on exchange and not
assimilation (220). These readings affirm that the involvement of Africa with modernity is much
more than influence; it creates the very framework of world cosmopolitanism.
The African aesthetic dynamism is that it combines ritual and innovation. According to
Osumare, the Africanist aesthetic has been a force of global culture that mediates the local
rhythmic systems to contemporary performance, particularly through global hip-hop (42). In her
work, she demonstrates that patterns of African expressiveness establish intercultural spaces of
dialogue. According to Mathuray, African modernism opposes postmodern discontinuity in that
creative experimentation becomes rooted in ethical community (1107). Such grounding turns the
artistic expression into the form of social coherence. As Jaji discloses, musical modernism in
Surname 32
32
Africa functions as a historical record and as a political instrument which sustains memory
through rhythm and performance (104). Her opinion supports the statement that music serves to
be an intermediation between art and activism. Smith claims that without these cultural
conversations that bring emotion, ritual, and group identity back to creative practice, modernity
itself is half baked (18). In these intersecting analyses, African aesthetics should be seen to be the
beat of the contemporary modernity the world--fluid, moral, rhythmically sensitive to the human
situation.
The primitivism criticism opens one more opportunity to reassess the role of Africa in
modern art. Phillips re-examines the aesthetic primitivism to reveal the misperceptions of the
early modernists about the African art about its being primitive and how they at the same time
utilized it as a source of formal exploration (5). Her comment reveals the irony of western praise
and deviation. Gikandi sees this contradiction as an effect of racial modernity in which Africa
had become a symbolic place of renewal despite becoming a peripheral political entity (153). It
is revealed through his understanding that aesthetic appropriation reflected the overall colonial
contradictions. Ferdinand extends this debate by connecting spatializing of modern art to
colonial geography by stating that representation tried to mask dependency with discovery (56).
This reading can make one reconsider art as a way of building empire using visual language.
Meier claims that the inclination now toward being able to acknowledge Indigenous modernisms
reinstates the sense of agency to non-Western artists who defined the global aesthetic order
(223). The totality of these orientations reveals that the strength of modernism is neither
excluding but suppressed African lineages.
African postmodernism is the intellectual reaction to the contradictions of global
modernity. According to Lamola, African postmodernism refers to an epistemological trend that
Surname 33
33
combines native philosophy and critical self-reflection in order to provide an African thought as
the source of universal knowledge (118). His argument recovers philosophical modernity as a
colonial legacy. Mathuray continues that African stories use postmodern methods not to
discontinue the identity but to pluralize it by synthesizing myths and histories (1110). This
artistic pluralism reinvents postmodernism as a healing and not a deconstructive movement. Jaji
notices that African experiments of music and literature develop solidarity in inter-diasporic
spaces, forming transnational forms of modernity based on collective affect (109). Her
comparison places African postmodernism in the global solidarity systems. Smith finds that
contemporary modernist thought now needs to address the colonial past of modernism and
integrate these non-Western forms of critique into greater discourse (22). The combination of
these readings proves the African postmodernism as a philosophical artistic movement that alters
the self-conceptualization of modernity.
The spread of African performance aesthetics globally emphasizes the shift out of local
ritual to global media. According to Osumare, the African-based styles of performance,
especially the dance and hip-hop, create a transnational aesthetic that unites the diaspora
communities together by means of embodied storytelling (57). This practice play shows the way
art can be a form of social resistance. Jaji demonstrates that such world shapes bear the historical
memory, the sounds of jazz, reggae, and Afrobeat are connected to the beats of liberation (116).
Her viewpoint underlines the relatedness of music and political awareness. According to
Gikandi, the entry of African expressive culture into global modernity exposes the false
intertwining of race and creativity in the process of making modern sense (160). His summary
points African cultural forms as agents of world renewal. Kaur and Dave-Mukherji continue to
state that these transnational exchanges disturb established authenticity hierarchies through
Surname 34
34
facilitating hybrid and collaborative creativity (14). These concepts reveal that African aesthetics
do not flourish based solely on conservation but must always continue to be transformed and
redefined in new cultural circumstances.
The contemporary aesthetics of Africans reshape the connection of arts on the sense of
knowledge with accentuation to unity of mind, emotion, and ritual. According to Mellor and
Shilling, global modernity promotes the idea of reflexivity whereby people can redefine spiritual
traditions by using modern practice (280). This reflexivity is likened to the African artistic
philosophy that denotes that the sacred and the secular are in a fluid relationship. In this
synthesis, Ferdinand cites that the synthesis serves as an aesthetic mapping across, interatic,
disciplinary parameters that form new paradigms of knowing art as a spatial and ethical action
(63). His model has been used to find African creativity in global theories of knowledge. Gikandi
points out that African contemporary writers and artists are acutely aware of aesthetic form to
refute the colonial epistemologies and celebrate local knowledge (162). In his analysis, he
associates beauty to decolonial knowledge. According to Mathuray, African modernism attains
universality by merging myth, memory, and materiality and offers a whole picture of human
experience (1112). African art, therefore, makes knowledge production a creativity and a moral
process based on cultural self-consciousness.
African aesthetic cosmopolitanism goes beyond stylistic hybridity, as well, to ethical
universality. According to Siskind, cosmopolitan desires manifest the needs of human beings to
recognize each other within an order that is common to all people over the earth (18). His idea is
echoed across African Ubuntu relationality-determined philosophies of existence. According to
Jaji, an example of this ethical cosmopolitanism is given by music collaborations across the
African diaspora as it builds communities of empathy by performing (124). The world dialogue
Surname 35
35
makes philosophy sound. Kaur and Dave-Mukherji believe that the cultural flows of
globalization break up the fixed classifications of tradition and modernity and demand non-rigid
systems of aesthetics that acknowledge plurality (22). They are in line with African pluralism as
a moral and artistic value. Lamola arrives at a conclusion that African postmodern consciousness
can lead cosmopolitan thinking into more auxiliary and descriptive global modernity (122).
These lessons demonstrate that the African aesthetics do not just produce artistic diversity, but
also the moral imagination required to live peacefully in the global village.
The African art and digital modernity have formed new cultural agency spaces.
According to Meier, African artists have become more inclined to embrace the digital media to
redefine traditional iconography in a hybrid form that goes beyond geographical borders (222).
This technology interaction is a new stage of modernism in the world based on interconnectivity.
Ferdinand concurs that digital art is a type of mapping that brings to visual reality the invisible
networks of identity and migration (77). His interpretation places digital aesthetics in a similarity
with the diasporic experience of Africa. Osumare further notes that online performance cultures
bring the Africanist aesthetic into virtual spaces enabling voices of the threshold to remake the
global cultural narrative (69). These computerized manifestations increase artistic independence
and flexibility. According to Gikandi, the continued presence of African creativity in media
across the globe indicates that cultural resilience is in a position to adjust to the recent changing
technological circumstances without compromise of authenticity (164). These intersections keep
making the African aesthetics challenge modernity in the form of a developing dialogue between
technology, identity, and imagination.
African aesthetics will also suggest a reformulation of temporality of modern thought.
According to Ferdinand, global modernity must be understood as a spatial-temporal construct,
Surname 36
36
not as a linear evolution, in which artistic practice restages historical consciousness (82). His
interpretation is reflecting African cyclic idea of time, which considers creation to be the
constant renewal. This cyclical temporality, according to Mathuray, exists in the African
modernist texts that disintegrate into the past, as well as into the present to create mythic
continuity (1116). This is a literary form that is resilient towards colonial fragmentation. Jaji also
sees temporal arrangement of African music as a rhythmic dialogue, which coordinates history,
memory, and the future (130). The understanding portrays her vision on how art acts as a living
clock of cultural identity. Lamola extends this argument by claiming that African postmodernism
employs the multiplicity of time to criticize Western understanding of the progress and open
spaces to bring forth alternative modernities (125). Combined, these visions prove the fact that
African aesthetics re-create time as a creative and liberating space of the global modernity.
African aesthetics philosophy offers a guide towards resolving spirituality, modern
consciousness, and creativity. Mellor and Shilling suggest that in the aesthetic experience of
modern reflexivity, the renewed contact between body and spirit is possible (282). This
sentiment is echoed in the African art of holistic expression and faith. Lamola and Mathuray,
working on the same premises, view African postmodern art as a spiritual dialogue that unites
metaphysics with political awareness (127; 1118). This synthesis shows the revelation and
critique in art. According to Gikandi, through the incorporation of spirituality into the
modernistism aesthetic, African artists reverse the Western dichotomy of the sacred and secular
creativity (165). The African art is placed in his view as an African theology of presence. Siskind
will add that this integrative aesthetic becomes the building block of global cosmopolitanism
founded on empathy as well as on creative responsibility (21). Hence, African aesthetic
Surname 37
37
philosophy does not just redefine art, but recaptures the modernity as a divine human activity
that is an integration of reason, emotion, and transcendence.
Philosophy of Cultural Memory
Cultural memory also acts as a philosophical mediation between history and identity
enabling societies bargain continuity during the process of change. Hutton, notes that memory
can provide an alternative to historical objectivity as it can keep alive experience within stream
of collective meaning (295). This observation shows that memory is interpretive as well as
affective, connecting individual memory to the cultural affiliation. This is extended by Rigney
when she stresses on the idea that cultural memory is driven by aesthetic mediation, i.e. texts,
performances and rituals that mediate identity across generations (68). In her perception, the
intermingling of form and content in heritage preservation is highlighted. According to Makarov,
collective identity crises usually occur when the memory loses its coherence in symbols and
there is a lack of connection between the present and the past (14). This break illustrates the way
through which cultural continuity may be broken by forgetting. Ruin further includes that
forming memories is a hermeneutic process that reconstitutes the self by reconsidering the lack
and loss (200). Combined with the prior views, these also show that memory is not a passive
reserve, but rather whereby an active philosophical process re-creates meaning and stabilizes
civilization through time.
Philosophy of memory is concerned with how world communities are reconstructing the
past in order to find moral and cultural renewal. Meretoja maintains that storytelling is a moral
activity through which collective memory resolves the difference between fact and possibility
(102). Her opinion implies that memory does not save chronology but ethical imagination.
According to Hutton, historical memory is characterized by selective continuity, that is, societies
Surname 38
38
prefer narratives that ensure continuity and intent (298). It is this bias that makes memory into a
tool of cultural survival. Rieff, though, cautions the danger of the excess that fills in the
memorial, whereby the failure to forget makes communities unable to reconcile and move on
(44). Being wary, he points out the duality of memory, which is healing and burdensome.
Makarov locates this tension to postcolonial situations where recovered memories contradict the
silences imposed, and reinstate dignity (16). These studies confirm the notion that cultural
memory exists as a negotiating place-between remembering and regenerating- to enhance moral
standing in a civilized society.
The connection between space and memory is an indication that identity is taken over by
the environment. According to Do-dam, cultural memory tends to take physical forms, like
monuments, hallowed places and landscapes, which hold communal history (72). His point
demonstrates how geography is an archives of group mind. Costea builds up on this image of
space as he speaks of architecture as a memory museum in which buildings hold the moral and
emotional sub-surface of a civilization (120). These constructions make memory material. Le
Roy, an interpreter of Walter Benjamin, views these lootings as philosophical residues that bring
concealed pasts into manifestation through pieces of the past (129). In his understanding,
memory is the continuation of decay, which implies that there is an ethics of attention to the
discarded. Rigney highlights that narrative and space overlap through aesthetic forms that allow
societies to live in the present of memory (71). These views portray that memory does not exist
as abstract reflection but as embodiment through space and determines cultures by continuity and
belonging.
New technologies change the maintenance and interpretation of collective memory. The
Usai writes about digital dark age as a new cultural susceptibility under the circumstances, where
Surname 39
39
swift technological acceleration is a danger to the permanence of the digital archives (12). His
worry reflects on how conservatory relies on the unstable material conditions. Bilbao
demonstrates that film and visual media produce emotional archives that help communities to
remember conflict and trauma (128). She shows in her analysis that representation mediates
memory, and it is not held in isolation. Phillips links this mediation to philosophical inquiries of
vulnerability and force, and according to Phillips, technologies of preservation maintain and
pervert experience (147). His perceptions provoke one to think of the way in which media
redefines the boundaries between remembering and knowing. According to Bernecker and
Michaelian, the memory is a restitution, which is not determined by established recall of facts
but depends on the current situation (2). These arguments together allow concluding that
modernity turns memory into a fluid, contested process to any extent balancing technological
innovation and the precariousness of cultural inheritance.
Cultural memory is also an instrument of reestablishing of identity and political
opposition. Makarov believes that the restoration of buried histories assists communities to cure
identity crises brought along by imperialism (15). Memorizing is converted into political action
by this process. Rigney points out that aesthetic forms, including music, performance, and
narrative, facilitate this recovery process in the context of translating trauma into common
meaning (70). She notes that art has catharsis and reconstruction. Rieff also makes this opinion
more complex, claiming that too frequent memorialization can make people stay as victims,
trapping societies in the plots of misery (47). His reasoning cautions us that we should not be
obsessed with obsessing and idolizing memory instead of transformation. Ruin sees the memory
process as an moral job, in which people take the burden of historical awareness (203). These
observations underscore the fact that the political nature of memory is that it is able to strike
Surname 40
40
equilibrium between grief and regeneration, such that the past does not dictate and rather inform
cultural identity.
The forms of narrative memory disclose how storytelling presents individual and social
consciousness of time. Meretoja refers to narrative as the moral essence of memory that
integrates interpretation and empathy to support communal life (109). Her narrative places
narrative as the place of moral reflection. Hutton defines history itself as a narrative process
where the process of remembering turns the basis of events into continuity that has a meaning
(301). Such a relationship implies that the world of philosophy and storytelling is interwoven in
forming the cultural coherence. Qing-feng ponders on the issue of how contemporary philosophy
reshapes memory in a phenomenological sense as an intentional practice of consciousness that
determines self, in its turn (30). His analysis places memory as the basis of the subjectivity of
humans. Bernecker and Michaelian also assert that there is always an element of imagination in
the process of remembering, and fact and interpretation have become hard to tell apart (3). All
these converging points of view represent narrative as an ethical and epistemological process
wherein memory becomes the creative basis of civilization.
Cultural memory helps make the civilization, but in changing the loss into continuity.
According to Ruin, anamnesis, or the act of philosophical remembering, turns forgetting into
reflection and enables societies to redefine the absence of something as something meaningful
(205). This idea of his reveals the way in which the process of remembering becomes a creative
one: a reconstruction. Hutton continues that history is a rewriting of memory, a subjective
experience in collective knowledge that determines the moral dimensions of a culture (300). His
perception suggests that the past is the work of an interpretative memory. As Rieff warns,
memory can maintain identity yet its politicization can perpetuate division as it turns out that
Surname 41
41
memory can be a strong barrier to reconciliation (50). The dual ethical potential of memory is
highlighted by such a paradox. Makarov argues that the collective identity becomes stable when
the communities learn to redefine, and not to idealize their pasts (17).
Cultural memory is depicted through philosophical meditations on how peoples bargain
with time, meaning and mortality. The Blanton approach to memory arises out of a materialist
theology in which memory serves as the assertion of immortal existence in the world of time
(145). His concept places memory as a spiritual rebuttal of finiteness. In another reading,
Benjamin is read by Le Roy, who writes about the fragment or leftover as a place where the
forgotten histories reappear to contest the hegemonic narratives (130). It is through this concept
that subaltern voices are recovered as residues of alternative histories. These fragments by
Hutton are linked to the rest of the cultural renewal in the past according to his reflections on
historical consciousness because remembering is an ethical reorganization of past time (303).
According to his analysis, memory is a moral continuum resource. Rigney notes that cultural
mediation cultural mediation, consisting of literature, ritual and visual art, forms a temporal
dialogue between past and present (74). Such meanings point in the direction of philosophy of
memory transposing linear history into a conversational process of life, in which loss and
renewal are both parts of the moral progression of civilization.
Cultural memory today serves both as an aesthetic practice that combines morality and
artistic devolution. According to Rigney, the aesthetic aspect of memory allows the societies to
redefine trauma with beauty and integrates remembrance into emotional and moral education
(73). Her point of view puts an emphasis on the redemptive nature of art. Bilbao notes that the
visual culture, especially cinema, is constructed to create collective memory, whereby conflict is
defined as the narrative experience that shapes the way how communities process suffering
Surname 42
42
(129). This perception places the media as an empathetic space. Phillips associates it with the
concept of trace developed by Derrida according to which memory is a performative practice that
unveils vulnerability in representation (150). His point of view highlights the vulnerability of the
experiential act of remembering as a moral experience. Costea continues to say that architecture
and design contain the memory of aesthetics, maintaining the social identity in terms of the
spatial narratives (123). These views in combination prove that the philosophy of memory cannot
be most continuously established and fulfilled in its absence of reflection alone but in aesthetic
imagination, which rehumanizes history.
Cultural dialogue and reconciliation are also predetermined by collective memory.
Hutton maintains that through memory, communities are able to reconnect with past difference
without erasing it (304). It is on the basis of this that memory is fundamental to democratic
pluralism. According to Rieff, moderation enables forgetting to be used as an ethical instrument
which can permit reconciliation to take the place of vengeance (52). His view redresses the
process of forgetting as an essential counterpart to memory. The experiment with spatial memory
used by Do-dam indicates that when a collective recognizes place, belonging to a place and
belonging to a people generates a sense of identity (77). This emphasizes the therapeutic nature
of the continuity of space. Meretoja expands on these concepts by opining that narrative memory
enables the societies to envision a different beginning other than the trauma (114). These visions
indicate that cultural memory is not only retrogressive but a progressive philosophical procedure
that reinstates solidarity by altering the historical contradiction to mutual comprehension.
The process of technological mediation has transformed the way in which cultural
memory is circulating and surviving. Usai issues a warning that digital culture is dangerous
because it seeks to eradicate memory because it is reliant on momentary formats and makes use
Surname 43
43
of volatile reserves (18). His caution presents how weak the contemporary memory is. Bilbao
also contends that digital media democratizes memory as well, whereby marginalized voices can
build alternative archives (131). This dual movement, loss and empowerment, is the ambivalence
of technology. Phillips explains this conflict in terms of phenomenology, and the idea is that
digital reproduction increases the scope of memory but erodes its authority (153). His analysis
criticizes the belief that access is preservation. According to Bernecker and Michaelian, in the
digital era, memory is transformed into a network process with collective intelligence
substituting personal remembering (3). When these arguments are combined, it becomes clear
that technological mediation turns memory into a collective creation (rather than an individual
inheritance), which compels philosophy to re-evaluate the definition of remembering in the
information age.
Historical dislocation and cultural amnesia tend to produce the crisis of memory in
modernity. According to Makarov, globalization is a cause of accelerating the identity crisis, as it
dispels those narratives that hold collective belonging (18). The last line of defense to cultural
fragmentation, according to his observation, is memory. According to Rieff, this crisis has been
termed as the paradox of remembrance- where societies remember either too much or too little
which causes a moral confusion (53). This contradiction makes the morality of commemoration
difficult. In modern philosophy, Qing-feng views memory as the source of human intention,
where identity is found in the process of remembering and not the standing nature (28). His point
suggests that forgetting is the loss of existential coherence. Hutton infers that the problem facing
modern civilization is how to strike a balance between the philosophical importance of the
memory and the psychological weight (305). These are some thoughts that indicate that cultural
Surname 44
44
memory is a lost and should be recovered to reestablish moral and intellectual sanity in a fast
evolving world.
The philosophy of cultural memory expresses the view of humanity based on continuity,
responsibility and creativity. Meretoja explains that storytelling converts memory into ethical
imagination and hence the societies can re-imagine justice and hope (118). Her shrewdness wins
the productive nature of memory. Ruin points out that remembering does not comprise simple
recollection, but rather the re discovery of self in communication with the past (208). His idea
correlates memory to existential development. Blanton takes this renewal to refer to material
affirmation of the idea of life beyond death by embedding human meaning to history (149). His
method is a combination of metaphysics and a historical consciousness. Rigney sums up that
cultural memory is flourishing when imagination mediates the trauma and possibility, preserving
what is lost and creates future (75). In total, these philosophers describe memory as the very
philosophical core of civilization- a process by which art or religion and reason collide to make
sure that the human story is still readable over generations.
Postcolonial Knowledge and Representation
Postcolonial knowledge appears as a counter discourse to the dominance of Western
knowledge systems. It aims to transform the construction of truth and authority. Barnett
postulates that postcolonialism contests the representational power which, historically, has
construed the non-Western world as passive and underdeveloped (165). His observation
illuminates the fact that power is, not only, structural, but also, deeply linguistic. Jazeel expands
this perspective by conceptualizing subaltern geographies as intellectual terrains where
marginalized peoples articulate counter colonial topographies (90). Such geographies reveal how
space, in and of itself, has been an ideological instrument of silencing. McEwan emphasizes that
Surname 45
45
decoloniality goes beyond critique by reframing development theory in relational ethics and
indigenous frameworks (44). Her reasoning shifts the discourse of knowledge to collaboration as
opposed to the hierarchical system. Rodríguez states that to decolonize rhetoric is to dismantle
the Eurocentric reasoning that veils inequality as a universal condition (52). Such insights
articulate that postcolonial knowledge is not an opposition to modernity, but an alternative way
of thinking that emphasizes inclusion and epistemic justice.
Within postcolonial contexts, the topic of representation continues to be fundamental in
the politics of knowledge. Lionnet argues that, in literature and the visual arts, postcolonial
representation articulates the silenced histories of a people and hybridizes their identity (23). Her
stance illuminates cultural invention as a form of intellectual autonomy. Dabashi insists that
post-orientalism must reveal the ways in which Western scholarship continues to distorts the
realities of the non-Western world while feigning objectivity (47). His analysis points to the
persistence of colonial mentality within contemporary scholarship. Le Roy advances this by
interpreting Walter Benjamin’s study of historical detritus as a method for piecing together
suppressed histories (128). This metaphor suggests the ethical burden of memory that
representation carries. In a similar vein, Phillips argues that such recovery is an engagement with
philosophical vulnerability, which redefines knowledge as an ethical relationship spawned by the
other’s story (150). The collective position of these thinkers is that representation is an act of
defiance and a moral reparation of some sort.
Placing epistemic injustice within the broader context of the postcolonial condition
permits a more critical analysis of what constitutes the bounding of a discipline. In the case of
the discipline of education, Jazeel argues, the boundin involves a merger of the material and the
symbolic, facilitating the weaving together of spatial justice and epistemic justice (95). Manisha
Surname 46
46
and Morrison design participatory frameworks informed by postcolonial critique of the
educational system which facilitate the crossing of knowledge co-creation and cultural co-
identity (12). Their frameworks position learners as proactive contributors to the knowledge
production process rather than passive consumers. Engaging in similar projects, they translated
frameworks intended for other spheres of social practice to participate in postcolonial
educational frameworks, discarding, and dis-invoking. This shift, Jazeel argues, bridges the acia:
postcolonial education which must aim to integrate the material and the symbolic as a means to
unite spatial justice with epistemic inclusion (95). These paradoxical ideas converge to frame
education as a process of unlearning the violent legacies of colonization, where to learn is to also
critique the frameworks of knowledge production and embrace a transformative ethos.
Moreover, the postcolonial representation within the power of the museum redefines the
museum’s politics as a site of translation and contestation of culture. As Barnett points out, the
museum has colonial power when it classifies the world’s cultures in a hierarchy of value and
progress (167). His assessment illustrates curatorial practice as a means of accomplishing
epistemic inequality. Do-dam’s concept of memory space demonstrates that cultural institutions
shape identity through remembering and forgetting (80). This reframes the museum as an
ideological site of history as opposed to simply a neutral space. Le Roy’s concept of the
historical leftover sheds further light on how artifacts embody resisted meanings that dominant
culture tries to erase (130). This alludes to the fact that even colonial archives hold memories
that are subversively and insidiously concealed. Rodríguez’s position that to decolonize the
museum is to shift from collection to dialogue, emphasizes the importance of narrative exchange
over display of material (61). These lines of thought retain the museum as a site that embodies
Surname 47
47
the core of postcolonial knowledge politics, an arena in which history, identity, and power
intertwine and transform.
The ethical consideration of memory onto which the decolonization of knowledge
proceeds is most certainly philosophical. As Bernecker and Michaelian note, the memory of a
people is a scaffolding memory with which the people of a society organize their past and their
self-understanding (2). Hence, their argument claims that the decolonization of knowledge is a
reconstruction of collective memory which steps outside the bounding box of Western
rationalism. Blanton sees this reconfiguration as a form of materialist spirituality, where
knowledge is a consequential affirmation of life and resistance to obliteration (148). His
philosophy of memory and survival believes that. Remembrance Preservation and Meretoja’s
argument about storytelling as a moral form of remembrance enables the silenced to express new
modalities of self (103). She reimagines narrative as an ethical tool of postcolonial recovery.
Opposition Phillips argues that the very standing of vulnerability to the knowledge systems is a
transformative capacity, as the willingness to engage with the other confronts the oppressive
frameworks of truth (151). This constellation of views demonstrates that the decolonization of
knowledge is, to a certain extent, philosophical, an attempt to reframe the very concepts of
knowledge and remembrance.
Bilbao uses visual testimony to illustrate how images of war and trauma serve as cultural
memories resisting hegemonic frameworks (128). These memories help reconstruct postcolonial
representations and demonstrate how visual history works; as Bilbao calls, counter-history.
Dabashi reframes postcolonial cinema from the perspective of complexity and argues that it is a
language that shatters orientalized frameworks of representation (53). His assertions demonstrate
cinema’s ability to reclaim agency. Blanton describes these visual acts as an undying life which
Surname 48
48
representation more-than sustains to the marginalized life. In this way, Blanton turns art into a
repository of metaphysical endurance. Lionnet further argues that postcolonial cinema is
hybridized and often brings together mythology and realism bounded by the West's repression of
realism as the sole truth (32). Blanton, Dabashi, and Lionnet’s works illustrate the consequences
of representation that is ethical and imaginative. They re-conceptualize the postcolonial identity
by shifting the gaze from object to subject, from other to self, and from spectacle to self-
expression.
The understanding of space and place carries the legacies of power inherited from
colonial mapping. Jazeel argues that subaltern geographies bring to the surface the hidden
politics of space and how imperial cartography transformed geography into a form of control
(91). What he reveals is that space is much more than a mere physical entity. Legg claims that
Foucault's power relations, when viewed in a postcolonial context, show how the order of space
within colonial rule is a means of domination control of power (272). Such a fusion geography
and philosophy is rare. Barnett observes that the act of postcolonial space reclamation entails
rewriting the symbolic geographies which continue to construct power relations globally (169).
His proposition dismantles the claims to the singularity of Western spatial imagination. McEwan
supports this through the notion that decolonial spatial practices, such as community mapping
and storytelling, recover the voices of the people muted by colonial borders (63). Collectively,
these ideas are powerful in demonstrating space as both tangible and conceptual where
sovereignty is silenced, yet easily reclaimable and rethought.
Postcolonial storytelling ethics reconstitute a narrative as a collective act of resistance. In
her works, Meretoja suggests that ethical storytelling affords the re-interpretation of history
through empathy, thus facilitating a space where identities may coexist without domination
Surname 49
49
(111). Such a philosophy recasts narrative as a form of political discourse. Lionnet shows that
postcolonial writing by women employs hybridity as a mode of resistance to self or other binary
representations, thus transforming the act of writing into cultural negotiation (44). In this way,
authorship is redefined as agency. Rodríguez goes on to say that decolonial discourse entails a
rhetorical self-critique that dismantles the colonial grammar of authority (59). In her view,
linguistic domination is a form of intellectual captivity. Dabashi argues that a post-Oriental
critique is by necessity an integrated scholarly and ethical discourse, maintaining that knowledge
separated from ethics is an act of oppression (61). All these views affirm that the act of
storytelling is much more profound than mere artistry, framing it as an innovative philosophical
approach to decolonizing meaning and restoring the dignity of plural voices.
Within a postcolonial context, the production of knowledge also entails rethinking
vulnerability, and epistemic humility. Phillips describes knowledge as fragile, resting with
difference and uncertainty (147). His framework proposes an openness to difference as a
prerequisite for learning. McEwan connects this vulnerability to development issues, claiming
that decoloniality requires mutual learning between the global North and the global South, and
not only South-to-North export of expertise (68). This reconceptualizes research as collaborative.
Barnett insists that postcolonial critique ought to refrain from replacing one order of dominance
for another in order to sustain critical reflexivity concerning the claims it makes about knowing
(171). This is a safeguard against ideological reversal. Blanton, through a theological lens, sees
this humility as the spiritual strength “to recognize the finitude and utter dependence, and see
these as a way of wisdom” (153). These positions agree that knowledge, in its unadulterated and
unoppressed form, is an ethical practice of care, reciprocity, and intellectual honesty.
Surname 50
50
Postcolonial reconstruction of archives and heritage has constructed who controls cultural
memory as a problem. Do-dam shows that the creation of memory places influences collective
belonging and therefore influences how societies understand their past (82). This suggests that
the process of decolonizing archives is both spatial and ideological transformation. Le Roy’s idea
of the leftover suggests that the colonial archives contain hidden counter-histories yet to be
reinterpreted (132). This situates curation as a form of justice. Lionnet links this paedogical
reclamation to the politics of gender asserting that the recovering of women’s voices greatly
alters the parameters of historical evidence (51). Her assertion expands the scope of
historiography to be more inclusive. McEwan argues that participatory heritage projects enhance
social empowerment whereby communities gain control to control their own representations
(70). These insights reinforce the notion that postcolonial knowledge is not constructed out of the
failing to address the past, but the ethical recontextualization of the past, and transformation of
archives to spaces of collective reconciliation.
Postcolonial knowledge is not just a critique, but an attempt to imagine what a future
understanding of humanity could look like. “Dabashi argues that to intellectual decolonize is to
go beyond the binary of West and non-West to construct a genuinely global philosophy of
mutual recognition” (75). Such a vision endorses the idea of domination-free epistemic
universality. Meretoja considers narrative the instrument through which such universality is
ethically anchored, allowing humanity to transform difference into a dialogue (118). Her
explanation brings together the questions of aesthetics and ethics. McEwan insists that the
decolonial should always attend to new geocentric inequalities and syntheses of global ecological
crises (74). This guarantees its relevance. Barnett observes postcolonialism from the angle of its
inability to differentiate between critique and creativity, always generating new forms of
Surname 51
51
knowing. This is the power of postcolonialism (173). These insights, taken together, demonstrate
that postcolonial knowledge is lived philosophy; an ever-evolving reconstruction of meaning that
is deeply anchored to justice, plurality and intellectual emancipation.
Gender, Myth, and Power
Gender and civilization shows the interrelated nature of both in how mythic archetypes
determined the moral order in both African and classical civilizations. Santayana claims that art
and myth are the initial carriers of moral thought, that moral concepts have a human shape (112).
This observation suggests that myth was not merely imagination, but also philosophy disguised
as a myth. His perspective throws light on why feminine gods came to be associated with
fertility, persistence and harmony. According to Sakaeva et al., civilization is described as a
system of cultural codes in which symbolic gender roles strengthen a collective identity (437).
This concept accentuates the fact that myths institutionalize moral regimes and replicate social
values over time. Their point is performative of myth in the preservation of social cohesion.
According to the Yoruba cosmology, Abiodun notes that feminine orishas, such as Oshun, are a
symbol of aesthetic and moral beauty, which is metaphorical enough to depict creativity and
justice (56). This understanding relates art to the sacrosanct femininity. Usman and Falola
contribute that gender in Yoruba civilization was relative, not absolute, but by building a
relationship of mutual respect between male and female gods (214). Collectively, these
fundamentals demonstrate that mythic femininity was neither secondary, however, but the focus
in the expression of balance in ancient moral and cosmological frameworks.
The continuity and renewal through feminine symbols is a relational emphasis of the
cyclical nature of civilization. Guo perceives the concept of civilization, as a dynamic process
that reinvents itself periodically via crises and rebirth (145). His model captures the way of
Surname 52
52
feminine archetypes to tend to carry such a regenerative cycle of destruction and renewal. His
idea is comparable to the mythical role played by maternal figures that restore cultural order
when a chaos occurs. Khairullina et al. address cyclical rhythms of human phenomena, which
connects to the renewal of the environment and the transforming of social behavior (2312).
Observation by them presents how civilizations tend to resemble the natural rhythms in the form
of goddesses of fertility and earth. This perception is associated with the fertility goddesses
whose symbolism relates ecological and cultural sustainability. Gunn et al. underline that human
societies grow in helical development which indicates that change is frequently necessitated by
the needs to recover the archaic patterns of harmony (4). They reflect the African cosmologies
restructuring cyclical birth in gendered divinity. According to Enaikele and Adeleke, the
feminine principle is intermediary to destiny and creation according to Yoruba mythology due to
the system of wisdom and nurturing power through Ifa system (8). Based on these readings, the
issue of civilization is characterized as being reliant on feminine symbolism as a metaphysical
and ecological restoration agency.
African and Greek myths of gender depict the way female divinity became power and
pedagogy. According to Willis, Yoruba masquerade ceremonies code teachings about kinship,
gender, and power, and through which female divinities direct the ethical framework of social
performance (92). This observation brings out the didactic language of ritual, as women transmit
their sacred power symbolically. His explanation shows that ritual art makes gender
philosophical. Ojaide associates folklore with indigenous knowledge regimes and claims that the
mythical women figures are responsible in being custodians of folklore and continuity of culture
(174). This association shows that storytelling acts as memory and control in the African
civilization. This highlights the symbolic importance of the women as moral dispensers. Through
Surname 53
53
the Orisa religion, Peel demonstrates that the female spiritual beings serve as an intermediary
between the sacred law and the social life in the community and thus releasing moral power in
the ethics of the community to them (119). His perception places gender as the pivot between
religion and government. Santayana relates this sacred mediation with the life of reason, in
which artistic expressions of femininity express principles of harmony and justice (128). These
convergent analyses define mythic womanhood as the ethical guide of civilization.
Ancient concepts of justice and political order also had a feminine influence. Kanu notes
that African traditional democracies, especially the Yoruba and Igbo, incorporated gender
complementarity in politics wherein power was divided between male and female councils (12).
This model can show how political stability was based on balance rather than hierarchy. His eyes
show mythical patterns of balance of divine couples. Richta assumes that technological and
cultural revolution is both disruptive and reliant upon conventional moral frameworks that often
have myth-like beginnings (72). In this view, cultural renewal must largely involve re-involving
ancient feminine virtues of balance and empathy. Such continuity is the reason why gendered
archetypes remain even in modern times. Usman and Falola record the history of Yoruba politics
being dependent on women ritual and economic power, which meant that, power was spiritual
just like it is administrative (233). At the expense of their research a combination of
cosmological order and social governance is shown. Abiodun connects the portrayals of female
divinity to social power saying that the visual representation institutionalized political morality in
the aesthetic language (61). All these analyses, together, confirm that feminine myth acted as a
template of the fair power structures.
The African and Greek civilizations with mythic representations of gender features a
common discussion of art, divinity, and moral teaching. According to Santayana, myths make
Surname 54
54
abstract truths tangible ideals but mold collective moral imagination as embodiments of symbols
(136). This is to say that myth is a demonstration of a cognitive role - it directly informs us in a
way that philosophy instructs us in argument. His claim explains the reason why female deities
embodied such virtues as justice and compassion. Jegede views the Ifa mythology as a universal
system in which human difference is the divine will and interprets gender difference as the
cosmic harmonization (38). Grendel Interpretation In his argument we are shown that gendered
cosmology is a metaphysical justification of diversity and equality. His opinion redefines gender
as a metaphysical category and not a social construct. Munoz speaks about the nature in which
African mythic femininity was kept alive through the syncretic religious forms of Afro-
Caribbean traditions, which rose to play a role in all the diasporic identities (195). This
continuity dwells on the strength of divine womanhood. Sakaeva et al. argue that the functional
structure of culture is based on the symbolic the equilibrium between masculine and feminine
values (440). The overall implication of these readings is that mythic gender was the civil
structure of moral architecture in a variety of cultural settings.
In the African societies, art and religion have always incorporated feminine energy as a
creative energy. According to Abiodun, the Yoruba art is an interplay between visual language
and theology and symbolizes the divine femininity as both creative and reactive (74). It is in his
statement that the creativity, in its essence, is kind of sacred when connected to the femininity.
This method places the aesthetics of beauty as an educational method. Willis points out that,
although the masquerade is usually enacted by men, it represents feminizing gods, and this plays
out the indeterminacy of gender as a performative and spiritual interaction (101). This duality
breaks down rigid gender binaries in terms of demonstrating that sacred power is a communal
thing, but not exclusive. His observation frustrates binary differences in masculine and feminine
Surname 55
55
power. Peel shows that Orisa religion encourages a mutual feminine and masculine impact in
which the divine and human relations reflect dependence on each other (128). It is this
reciprocity that makes up the ethical basis of the Yoruba civilization. Ojaide builds on this
thought by highlighting that folklore feminine symbols serve as pedagogues of moral
responsibility, as pedagogues of narrative imagination (178). These insights combined bring out
the oppressive ability of art in gendered cosmology as a dialogue of life within creation,
morality, and identity of community.
Feminine myth resurrection in the African contemporary thought is a form of
philosophical reclaiming. Usman and Falola report on how modern Yoruba thinkers remake the
old gods in the postcolonial times as a means of standing against the world (249). According to
their discovery, mythology serves as a historical form of therapy to reconcile ruptures of cultural
memory. Their writing shows the ability of myth to rejuvenate a culture. According to Richta,
civilization at crossroads implies that technological development should reconnect with its moral
core by rediscovering a humanistic, usually feminine, set of values (88). Through his words, he
suggests that a lack of ethical foundation in progress leads to self-destruction. This is equivalent
to African appeals to ethical moderation in modernization. Khairullina et al. demonstrate that
human development is cyclical and that balance has to be established between the forces of
nature and those of social aspect to prevent crisis (2315). Their claim fits into the feminine type
of keeper of balance. Canu claims that the recuperation of indigenous gender systems presents a
variant of democracy where people cooperate and are morally keen (15). These readings confirm
that the re-invention of myths of the feminine is not a nostalgia but a strategy of epistemology of
ethical modernity.
Surname 56
56
Feminine power in myths is also overlapping with ecological and cosmic sign. Gunn et
al. explain the process of civilization as a helical one as the forces of the environment and
spiritual forces are in constant action to transform the complexity of the social sphere (7). This
circular concept highlights the fact of femininity as the self-renewing ability of both nature and
mankind. This helical vision concludes with references to feminine cosmology that creation is a
nurturing cycle. According to Abiodun, the Yoruba aesthetics view nature as a divine language,
and feminine orishas represent the moral intelligence of nature (82). His explanation indicates
the ecological ethics cannot be conveyed without the spiritual gender principles. His reading
places the symbolic power of women in ecological ethics. Khairullina et al. say that climate and
human civilization are mutually dependent, and this presents the fact that sustainability can be
found in the re-establishment of cultural traditions of balance (2318). Their observations reflect
mythical doctrines of oneness with nature. Ojaide adds that the indigenous literature entrenches
ecological care in feminine-focused narratives, which perceive the land as mother and instructor
(180). All these views put together show mythic femininity as a principle of civilisation, which
integrates ecology, morality, and the responsibility of creativity in a sacred field.
Gendered myth is also a form of historical consciousness, which is keeping civilizational
values intergenerational. According to Santayana, civilization moves forward by maintaining the
ideals of the spirit which are written in art and myth (142). Having foresight, his insight is that
memory itself, as aestheticized, is continuity itself and criticism itself. In his statement, he
identifies memory as the moral motor of civilization. Enaikele and Adeleke discover that the Ifa
system records human destiny, orally, when feminine wisdom protects the survival of moral law
(11). Through their argument, the role of storytelling in oral form like philosophy makes the
retelling of ethical truths alive. This creates the maternal principle of knowledge custodian.
Surname 57
57
Usman and Falola divulge that oral female performance in the past served to act as a communal
education as it allowed the mythical teachings to be connected with societal morality (252).
Their conclusions demonstrate that narrative supports cultural coherence. Sakaeva et al. contend
that the continuation of civilization depends on the dynamic relationship among the symbolic
systems, where gender is viewed as an organizing axis (442). All these analyses demonstrate that
the feminine myth establishes the memory, adaptability, and regeneration of the moral meaning
of civilization.
The connection among gender, myth and power indicates the lowest ethical trends of
civilization. Santayana sees civilization as moral art in which the ideals of beauty and justice are
the result of imaginative synthesis of experience (156). This argument explains that the moral
creativity of civilization relies on its symbolic interpretation of the harmony of genders. His
ideology places mythical femininity in the role of the conscience of civilization. According to
Abiodun, Yoruba divine iconography is perceived as a visual theology that codes feminine virtue
into ethics within the community (90). The implication of this reading is that art acts like
scripture, which influences moral consciousness by way of beauty. This once again upholds art
as moral speech. It is important to note that gendered spirituality was a vital aspect to African
political systems in the past that ensured social harmony, and provides examples of moral
balance in modern governance (Kanu 18). It is the civic aspect of gender that was brought to
light through his insight. Richta concludes that the reestablishment of the civilization lies on the
attainment of a reconnecting of spiritual wisdom and scientific progress (94). It is the
convergence of these views that declare the symbol of femininity is not a by-product of mythic
reasoning but a living tradition of sanity, beauty and moral order, a continual support of ancient
and modern society.
Surname 58
58
Reimagining Civilization through Dialogue
Silence must be placed within the context of the civilization that the epistemic culture of
the culture of silence creates. Buber states that people face individually or culturally when
genuine encounter occurs, and which is mutual unveiling of each other, not. His definition of
encounter disposes of domination in favor of civilization that is founded on mutual relationship.
Abdullah extends this perspective by proposing an integrated paradigm in which religion,
science and culture are interrelated integrated rather than separate spheres. This synthesis shifts
the definition of dialogue as the enduring basis of human civilization rather than a choice of
morality. Grieser notes that knowledge is created through the tension and translation of
disciplines which turns difference into creativity. Her insight means that misunderstanding as a
phenomenon can in and of itself generate intellectual change. Meyer goes on to note that visual
culture is a medium of encounter in which the perception of religion as well as the perception of
art come together to articulate something that is not visible. These stances together outline
dialogue as the ethical and constitutive dissolution of knowledge, art and spirit.
Reinterpreting art and science as relational and practical activities and contemplating
civilization anew through dialogue is a very interesting proposition. Latour points out that both
science and religion try to make what is not seen visible by constructing networks of trust
between their interpreters and audiences (423). This observation of Latour tells us that
representation is an ethical act of communication. Shaw, for example, argues that Islamic art
achieves this communicative act by unifying the phenomenal and the spiritual, thus turning sight
into an ethical encounter (211). Her assessment of the situation demonstrates the potential of
aesthetics to foster empathy between disparate cultures. Kagan views sustainability as an artistic
principle of patterning where the ecological and cultural systems are intertwined and supported
Surname 59
59
as a web (34). This reasoning associates creativity with planetary responsibility. Alivizatou
argues that museums and other cultural heritage spaces need to transform into spaces of dialogue
that support the intangible heritage of participatory narrative construction as an act of preserving
cultural memories (76). The arguments presented above in their totality indicate that the ability
to renew civilization, rests upon the re-establishment of dialogue between art, science, and
spirituality as cooperative languages of understanding.
The philosophical basis of dialogue also requires critiquing the distinction of the life and
the non-human. TallBear critiques the life/not-life binary through indigenous materialism which
regards interspecies relations as knowledge constitutive of life (181). This formulation
repositions dialogue within progressive reciprocity of ecoethics. Aloi broadens this perspective
through the aesthetics of the Anthropocene by claiming that contemporary art exposes the
permeable borders of nature and culture (113). His analysis suggests that civilization ought to be
envisioned as an ecological dialogue and not a monologue of humankind. Kagan complements
this by defining sustainability as a cultural disposition that thrives on complexity and mutualistic
reciprocity (39). This orientation demonstrates dialogue as the rhythm of existence. Abdullah
connects this interconnection to spiritual epistemology and argues that religious ethics ordain
responsibility towards all forms of life as participants of a divine order (185). These ideas
reframe dialogue not as a form of diplomacy which is anthropocentric but as a form of cosmic
discourse which includes all beings woven into the moral tapestry of civilization.
The sequel “Dialogic” is produced when you combine historical intellect with cultural
reflexivity. Shefer-Mossensohn describes the way Ottoman scholars absorbed Greek, Persian,
and Arabic as proof that scientific creativity flourishes out of cultural integration (67). Her
description shows that intellectual advancement is not the product of isolation, quarantine, or
Surname 60
60
intact encapsulation. Machlup describes the production of knowledge as a social phenomenon,
the existence of which depends upon constellations of circuits and interchange as opposed to
freestanding blockages of social stasis (48). His point is that civilization is the sum total of the
circulation of ideas across boundaries or borders. Ideas, as advanced by Latour, permeate both
art and science only when one is free to “reconceptualize” and abandon the desire to settle on a
notion of absolute truth (430). This stance, argued by Buber, is a kind of relational ethics flowing
from the principle of mutual recognition. Grieser points out that knowledge is never static, but is
the outcome of mediation translation and recontextualization across and within silos of
disciplines (241). All the above arguments put together point to the same conclusion: it is the
absence of dialogue which, paradoxically, transforms knowledge into pliable, reflexive, and self-
critical enterprise which devoids the liveliness associated with civilization.
It is this dialogue, and its bridge between heritage and innovation, that defines cultural
sustainability. Stylianou-Lambert et al. contend that any cultural policy aimed at sustainability
must be multi-scalar and multi-actor, particularly with regard to museums, which need to be
active social advocates rather than static containers of social heritage (570). In this regard, their
framework underscores participation as a relational justice principle. Alivizatou points out that
intangible heritage is strengthened when communities engage in self-narratives and interactive
dialogues, thus linking preservation with empowerment (82). This strengthens the idea of
heritage as a dialogue. In her analysis of visual religion, Meyer suggests that seeing and
believing are fused within communal acts of reciprocal imagination, thus framing cultural
preservation as a communal act of dreaming (337). This is where she connects memory and
imagination. Kagan argues that sustainable art integrates the aesthetic, ecological, and ethical
realms of existence by exercising interdependence as beauty (41). These diverse viewpoints are
Surname 61
61
testimony to the fact that the balance of innovation and tradition is necessary for the dialogue of
cultural empathy needed by a self-renewing civilization.
The Dialogue book articulates civilization’s moral foundation as the ability to reason and
believe. It includes capturing the encounter with the divine not as submission but as relational
awareness, whereby the human self-fulfills by being open to the other (56). This view has led
him to spirituality as the grammar of dialogue. Abdullah states the combination of religion and
science regains the rupture unity of the human mind, and thus, rational ethical thinking is able to
aid positive inquiry and research (189). This combination, in essence, removes the division
between faith and rationality. Shaw deepens this synthesis when she studies Islamic aesthetics
and explains how it connects the divine transcendence with human perception and transforms art
into a meditative dialogue of the creator with the creation (224). This new use of approach makes
seeing a spiritual act of understanding. Similarly, Latour describes representation as a form of
caring. In this case, both faith and science defend the weak links of the symbols to the real world
and to each other (435). These different insights allow Latour to frame dialogue as the moral
structure of self-awareness of civilization.
The Yoruba's philosophical perspective provides a model of dialogic civilization which is
rooted in ethical character and cosmic concordance. As Abayomi puts it, the concept of
mlúàbí is a person who possesses moral integrity, humility, and, personhood (12). This ethical
system is, in many ways, Buber’s ideal of the I-Thou relationship, from which dignity is birthed
from an encounter. Okewande’s semiotic analysis of Ifa and Ìbejì shows that Yoruba cosmology
bridges the natural and supernatural worlds through scommunicative acts that span the seen and
the unseen (18). His work shows that within the corporeal and the corporeal, dialogue goes
beyond human utterances to metaphysical exchanges. Sègla contends that in Yoruba
Surname 62
62
ethnoastronomy, moral and relational reconstructions of the cosmos as a web of relational
observation, therefore, yield scientific knowledge (1053). His narrative offers an account of a
science fostered by spiritual dialogue. As advanced by Usman and Falola, these cosmological
themes are linked to societal organization, and demonstrate that deliberative consensus was the
primary mode of power structuring in Yoruba communities (258). Collectively, these concepts
demonstrate that dialogue is primary governance, and a sacred fact of existence.
Artistic imagination plays a notable role in cross-cultural dialogue in our contemporary
society. Meyer states that visual forms render abstract cultural and religious significances
tangible, and so converts difference into a shared aesthetic experience (339). This position re-
conceptualizes art as a domain of sympathy. Shaw demonstrates that in Islamic civilization, art
integrates faith with perception and teaches the viewers how to engage with difference through
beauty rather than through judgment (230). This demonstrates that art holds civilizational ethics.
Latour points out that both artists and scientists practice the same form of mediation—translating
the unseen to relational visibility (428). This position integrates imagination with investigation
for a common communicative goal. Kagan states that for sustainability, art demands that the
artist plays the role of cultural mediator who highlights the interconnection of ecological and
social systems (48). These threads suggest that art, as the visual language of dialogue, embodies
civilization’s dedication to coexistence and constructive reciprocity.
Surname 63
63
Works Cited
Abayomi, O. "mlúàbí: Perspectives to value and character in traditional Yoruba societies."
2015,
Abdullah, Muhammad Amin. "Religion, science, and culture: An integrated, interconnected
paradigm of science." Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 52.1 (2014): 175-203.
Abiodun, Rowland. Yoruba art and language: Seeking the African in African art. Cambridge
University Press, 2014.
Alivizatou, Marilena. Intangible heritage and the museum: New perspectives on cultural
preservation. Routledge, 2016.
Aloi, Giovanni. Speculative taxidermy: Natural history, animal surfaces, and art in the
Anthropocene. Columbia University Press, 2018.
Barnett, Clive. "12 Postcolonialism: Powers of Representation." Approaches to Human
Geography: Philosophies, Theories, People and Practices (2014): 163.
Belcher, Stephen Paterson. Epic traditions of Africa. Indiana University Press, (1999): 1-26
Bennett, Andy, and Ian Rogers. Popular music scenes and cultural memory. Palgrave Macmillan
UK, 2016.
Bernal, M. Black Athena Retrieved on June 29, 2017, from
http://www.freedocumentary.tv/black-athena-the-fabrication-of-ancient-greece/
Bernecker, Sven, and Kourken Michaelian. "Editors’ introduction: The philosophy of memory
today." The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. Routledge, 2017. 1-3.
Bilbao, AnaMary. "Surviving Images: Cinema, War, and Cultural Memory in the Middle
East." Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image 9 (2017): 127-132.
Surname 64
64
Blanton, Ward. A materialism for the masses: Saint Paul and the philosophy of undying life.
Columbia University Press, 2014.
Blanton, Ward. A materialism for the masses: Saint Paul and the philosophy of undying life.
Columbia University Press, 2014.
Buber, Martin. Eclipse of God: Studies in the relation between religion and philosophy. Princeton
University Press, 2015.
Costea, Ramona. "The Architecture of Memory. The Memory of Architecture." Special Number
Philosophy & Architecture (2015): 119.
Dabashi, Hamid. Post-orientalism: Knowledge and Power in a Time of Terror. Routledge, 2017.
Do-dam, Lee. "Cultural memory and reflection on location: Focus on A. Assmann’s space of
memory." Philosophy and culture 36 (2017): 70-91.
Enaikele, M. D., and A. T. Adeleke. "Yorubas' Ifa system and human destiny: An oral narrative
account." Fourth World Journal 16.2 (2018): 5-17.
Ferdinand, Simon. Mapping beyond measure: Art, cartography, and the space of global
modernity. U of Nebraska Press, 2019.
Field, Roger. "The classics, African literature, and the critics." English in Africa 44.1 (2017): 73-
95.
Fraser, Robert. "Of Sirens, Science and Oyster Shells: Hypatia the Philosopher from Gibbon to
Black Athena." Literature, Music and Cosmopolitanism: Culture as Migration. Cham:
Springer International Publishing, 2018. 51-64.
Gikandi, Simon. "Race and the modernist aesthetic." Writing and Race. Routledge, 2017. 147-165.
Grieser, Alexandra. "Formation of Knowledge Between Religion and Science." Aesthetics of
Religion: A connective concept 58 (2017): 237.
Surname 65
65
Gunn, Joel D., et al. "Geo-cultural time: advancing human societal complexity within worldwide
constraint bottlenecks—a chronological/helical approach to understanding human–
planetary interactions." BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality 4.3 (2019): 10.
Guo, Rongxing. "Civilization as a cyclical human process." An economic inquiry into the
nonlinear behaviors of nations: Dynamic developments and the origins of civilizations.
Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. 139-172.
Hale, Thomas A. "Griots and Griottes: Introduction and Chapter Two." Research in African
Literatures 25.3 (1994): 17-81.
Haley, Shelley P. "Black feminist thought and classics: re-membering, re-claiming, re-
empowering." Feminist theory and the classics. Routledge, 2014. 23-43.
Hutton, Patrick H. "Philosophical reflections on the ways of memory and history." History and
Theory 57.2 (2018): 292-305.
Jaji, Tsitsi. Africa in stereo: Modernism, music, and pan-African solidarity. Oxford University
Press, 2014.
Jazeel, Tariq. "S ubaltern geographies: Geographical knowledge and postcolonial
strategy." Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 35.1 (2014): 88-103.
Jegede, Charles Obafemi. "Ifa mythology on human variations and global African identity and
global contact." Canadian Social Science 12.10 (2016): 34-41.
Kagan, Sacha. Art and sustainability: Connecting patterns for a culture of complexity. Vol. 25.
transcript Verlag, 2014.
Kanu, Anthony Ikechukwu. "African traditional democracy with particular reference to the Yoruba
and Igbo political systems." Political theory 8.9 (2015): 10.
Surname 66
66
Kaur, Raminder, and Parul Dave-Mukherji, eds. Arts and aesthetics in a globalizing world. Taylor
& Francis, 2015.
Khairullina, Elmira R., et al. "Global climate change: Cyclical nature of natural and permanent
nature of man-made processes." EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 13.2 (2019): 2311-2316.
Kompatsiaris, Panos. "Whitewashing the nation: Racist jokes and the construction of the African
‘other’in Greek popular cinema." Social Identities 23.3 (2017): 360-375.
Lamola, M. John. "African postmodernism: Its moment, nature and content." International
Journal of African Renaissance Studies-Multi-, Inter-and Transdisciplinarity 12.2 (2017):
110-123.
Latour, Bruno. "How to be iconophilic in art, science, and religion?." Picturing science, producing
art. Routledge, 2014. 418-440.
Le Roy, Frederik. "Ragpickers and Leftover Performances: Walter Benjamin’s philosophy of the
historical leftover." Performance Research 22.8 (2017): 127-134.
Lefkowitz, Mary R., and Guy MacLean Rogers, eds. Black athena revisited. UNC Press Books,
2014.
Legg, Stephen. "Beyond the European province: Foucault and postcolonialism." Space, knowledge
and power. Routledge, 2016. 265-289.
Lionnet, Françoise. Postcolonial representations: women, literature, identity. Cornell University
Press, 2018.
Machlup, Fritz. "Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic significance: Knowledge
and Knowledge Production." (2014): 1-304.
Mainsah, Henry, and Andrew Morrison. "Participatory design through a cultural lens: insights
from postcolonial theory." Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference:
Surname 67
67
Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and
Keynote abstracts-Volume 2. 2014.
Makarov, Andrey I. "Philosophy of Memory and Crisis of Collective Identity." Logos et
Praxis 17.1 (2018).
Marks, Laura U. "Monad, database, remix: Manners of unfolding in The Last Angel of
History." Black Camera: An International Film Journal (The New Series) 6.2 (2015): 112-
134.
Mathuray, Mark. "The Famished Road after postmodernism: African modernism and the politics
of Subalternity." Callaloo 38.5 (2015): 1100-1117.
McEwan, Cheryl. Postcolonialism, decoloniality and development. Routledge, 2018.
Meier, Prita. "Modernism in Africanist art history: The making of a new discipline." The
Modernist World. Routledge, 2015. 214-224.
Meighoo, Sean. The End of the West and Other Cautionary Tales. Columbia University Press,
2016.
Mellor, Philip A., and Chris Shilling. "Re-conceptualising the religious habitus: Reflexivity and
embodied subjectivity in global modernity." Culture and Religion 15.3 (2014): 275-297.
Meretoja, Hanna. The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible.
Oxford University Press, 2018.
Meyer, Birgit. "Picturing the invisible: visual culture and the study of religion." Method & Theory
in the Study of Religion 27.4-5 (2015): 333-360.
Munoz, Fr Louis J. "Cuba has been called the island of the black fidelity. There, African traditions-
Yoruba, Fon and Congo-have remained faithful to their ancestors and African civilizations,
Surname 68
68
although at times in a fragmentary and simplified form, have continued." Compass-
Comparative Literature in Africa: Essays in Honour of Willfried F. Feuser (2015): 193.
Ojaide, Tanure. "Indigenous Knowledge and Its Expression in the Folklore of Africa." Indigeneity,
Globalization, and African Literature: Personally Speaking. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan US, 2015. 169-181.
Okewande, Oluwle Tẹwgboye. "Natural and supernatural human beings in African philosophy:
A semiotic investigation of links between Ifá and Ìbejì among the Yorùbá." International
Journal of Intellectual Discourse 2.1 (2019): 12-22.
Osumare, Halifu. The Africanist aesthetic in global hip-hop: Power moves. Springer, 2016.
Peel, John David Yeadon. Christianity, Islam, and Oriṣa Religion: three traditions in comparison
and interaction. University of California Press, 2016.
Phillips, John WP. "Force and Vulnerability in Philosophy and Science: Husserl, Derrida,
Stiegler." Cultural Politics 11.2 (2015): 145-161.
Phillips, Ruth B. "Aesthetic primitivism revisited: The global diaspora of'primitive art'and the rise
of Indigenous modernisms." Journal of Art Historiography 12 (2015): 1.
Qing-feng, Y. A. N. G. "Memory Studies in Modern Philosophy." Journal of East China Normal
University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 49.5 (2017): 26.
Richta, Radovan. Civilization at the crossroads: Social and human implications of the scientific
and technological revolution (international arts and sciences press): Social and human
implications of the scientific and technological revolution. Routledge, 2018.
Rieff, David. In praise of forgetting: Historical memory and its ironies. Yale University Press,
2016.
Surname 69
69
Rigney, Ann. "Cultural memory studies: Mediation, narrative, and the aesthetic." Routledge
international handbook of memory studies. Routledge, 2015. 65-76.
Rodríguez, Encarnación Gutiérrez. "Decolonizing Postcolonial Rhetoric 1." Decolonizing
European Sociology. Routledge, 2016. 49-67.
Ruin, Hans. "Anamnemic subjectivity: new steps toward a hermeneutics of memory." Continental
Philosophy Review 48.2 (2015): 197-216.
Safvan, P. T. "On the Road to a Postcolonial Consciousness of Selfhood: Narrator’s Quest for the
Past in Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing." The Creative Launcher 2.3 (2017): 325-332.
Sakaeva, Liliya R., Diana R. Sabirova, and Evgeniya V. Kuznetsova. "Culture and civilization:
functional and methodological aspects." Revista Publicando 5.16 (1) (2018): 435-442.
Santayana, George, and James Gouinlock. The Life of Reason, Or the Phases of Human Progress,
Reason in Art. Vol. 7. Mit Press, 2015.
Sègla, Dafon Aimé. "Yoruba Ethnoastronomy-“Orisha/Vodun” or How People’s Conceptions of
the Sky Constructed Science." Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy.
Springer, New York, NY, 2015. 1051-1058.
Shaw, Wendy MK. What is “Islamic” art?: Between religion and perception. Cambridge
University Press, 2019.
Shefer-Mossensohn, Miri. Science among the Ottomans: The cultural creation and exchange of
knowledge. University of Texas Press, 2015.
Siskind, Mariano. Cosmopolitan desires: global modernity and world literature in Latin America.
Vol. 14. Northwestern University Press, 2014.
Smith, Terry. "Rethinking modernism and modernity now." Filozofski vestnik 35.2 (2014).
Surname 70
70
Stylianou-Lambert, Theopisti, Nikolaos Boukas, and Marina Christodoulou-Yerali. "Museums
and cultural sustainability: stakeholders, forces, and cultural policies." International
Journal of Cultural Policy 20.5 (2014): 566-587.
TallBear, Kim. "Beyond the life/not-life binary: A feminist-indigenous reading of
cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new materialisms." Cryopolitics: Frozen
life in a melting world (2017): 179-202.
Usai, Paolo Cherchi. The death of cinema: History, cultural memory and the digital dark age.
Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Usman, Aribidesi, and Toyin Falola. The Yoruba from prehistory to the present. Cambridge
University Press, 2019.
Visonà, Monica Blackmun, et al. A history of art in Africa. Pearson/Prentice Hall, (2008): 228-
278.
Willis, John Thabiti. Masquerading Politics: kinship, gender, and ethnicity in a Yoruba town.
Indiana University Press, 2018.