Need corrections made, one more time on my thesis

profiledavidifediba4
ThesisFullDraftMarch22ndDavid.pdf

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

i

EXAMINING AFRICAN AMERICAN MALE YOUTH EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES

THROUGH AN ECOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL OUTLOOK

A THESIS

Presented to the Department of Advanced Studies in Education and Counseling

California State University, Long Beach

In Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

Education Specialist in School Psychology

Committee Members:

Kerri Knight-Teague, Ph.D. (Chair) Edwin Achola, Ph.D

Kirstin Powers

College Designee:

Anna M.Ortiz, Ph.D.

By David Ifediba

B.A., 2020, University of California, Riverside

May 2024

Kristin DhD

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

ii

ABSTRACT

In 2015 and 2016, the overall life expectancy for the United States (US) population

experienced a slight decline from 76.3 years to 76.1 years (Khazan, 2017). This decrease was

primarily attributed to a notable increase in the mortality rate among African American males.

Furthermore, research has shown that high social stress levels can lead to elevated stress

hormones, such as proinflammatory cytokine activity and cortisol levels (Dickerson, Gruenewald

& Kemeny, 2004). This chronic stress has been linked to a lack of social support and an

increased prevalence of psychological problems over time (Schmeelk-Cone & Zimmerman,

2003). However, despite these concerning statistics, existing literature has not adequately

explored the relationship between school safety, school satisfaction and levels of happiness

experienced by African American male youth in educational setting in comparison to their

Hispanic and Caucasian counterparts. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing data from

the California Healthy Kids Study (CHKS) and adopting historical and ecological perspectives to

examine these complex factors. The outcomes of this study will not only offer insights into

strategies for promoting improved academic outcomes among African American male youth and

contribute to efforts to rectify racial health disparities between this demographic and the majority

population.

Keywords: racism, discrimination, resilience, African-American, males

t

l mail.ie iin

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to begin by expressing my gratitude to God, whose strength sustained me

throughout this journey, enabling me to complete this thesis. I extend heartfelt thanks to my

parents, Paul and Nwanneka Ifediba, for their unwavering support and inspiration. To my

siblings, Ifeanyi, Izuchukwu, and Ifunanya, your encouragement fuels my dedication to

education. I am deeply grateful to my extended family in Nimo, Nigeria, and the communities of

St. Eugene Catholic Church, Igbo Catholic Community USA, and Umu Igbo Unite for their

steadfast support. Special thanks to the Department of Advanced Studies in Education and

Counseling at California State University, Long Beach, for their resources and guidance. I owe a

debt of gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Dr. Kerri-Knight Teague, for her invaluable expertise

and feedback. Likewise, to my thesis committee members, Dr. Edwin Achola and Dr. Kirsten

Powers. I also acknowledge the California Department of Education and California Healthy Kids

Survey, particularly, Ben Trigg for granting me access to essential student data. Furthermore to

Dr. Erin Arruda for her assistance with analysis and coding of this work. the Lastly, I appreciate

Dr. Carolyn Murray and her lab for inspiring this topic and my time at UC Riverside's USA

STEM Academy. May the findings of this thesis contribute to advancing equitable education and

amplifying the voices of marginalized youth in Los Angeles schools and beyond.

Ki

Yi

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………………………………..iii

LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………………….v

INTRODUCTION…………...………………………………………………………………... 1

LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………………………... 11

METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………... 28

RESULTS …………………………………………………………………………………………….33

DISCUSSION …………………………………….………………………………………………….37

REFERENCES……………………………………..…………………………………………...45

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

v

LIST OF TABLES

1. Table 1 Descriptives………………...………………………………………………….. 33

2. Table 2 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 1…………...…34

3. Table 3 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 2……………...35

4. Table 4 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 3……………...36

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

When interacting with another person, one expects fairness and equality throughout the

discussion. This can be described as a "normal" discussion, and the principle of the Golden Rule,

or treating others how you would like to be treated, should be applied. Yet, this is not always the

case. Moments of discrimination or unfair treatment may occur to an individual when it is least

expected. Additionally, these moments occur more to minorities than previously thought. African

Americans frequently report higher levels of discrimination than their peers (Pew Research

Center, 2021). Furthermore, these instances of discriminatory treatment have led to worse health

outcomes (Paradies, 2006). Levels of everyday discrimination are associated with higher

morbidity and mortality rates than acute instances (Williams & Mohammed, 2009).

However, linking discrimination as the cause of these detrimental health concerns for

African Americans does little to understand the historical context of African American

communities and the years of oppressive historical occurrences in their rich history. Historians

debate the beginning of slavery; however, Grosfoguel, (2011) reports that the first enslaved

people being dropped off in late August 1619 appears to be the story widely accepted, despite

reports of Africans being present in the American societies prior due to exploratory endeavors by

Christopher Columbus in the 1400s. Regardless, this marked the inception of a multi-billion-

dollar slave trade along with racism and discriminatory treatment that would last for generations

(Colen et al., 2018).

As enslaved people continued to be brought to the United States, the cotton industry soon

began to develop to exploit enslaved people to their full potential. Slaves were also cruelly

beaten, lynched, and murdered if they tended to disobey or betray their masters. As a result, the

ofdiscrimination

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

2

Civil War and Emancipation Proclamation were pillars in African American and United States

history that showed the United States' various views on slavery. The liberal North and the

oppressive South fought dearly for the right to the possession of enslaved people. Their

importance cannot be undermined due to their prevalence and strength in the United States

economy.

As the country recovered from its pre-Civil War era, a new wave of issues would begin to

rot and swallow the country in the upcoming 20th century. One of the most significant rulings

during this era was Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. This landmark ruling stated that racial

segregation of children in schools was unconstitutional. This cornerstone ruling allowed for

equal education (Ponti, 2022). The motivation was that African American students received

inadequate education compared to their white counterparts. School segregation, bathrooms,

public restaurants, and public transportation further exacerbate these ideas. Nevertheless, in

1957, the "Little Rock Nine'' became the pillar of resilience in the African American community.

By blazing the trail and attending an integrated school with thousands of white onlookers

screaming profanity and slurs, they began a new generation of race dynamics in the United States

and its education system.

Despite the strides taken in the course of over 400 years of African American history, the

remnants of slavery and racism remain and affect many African Americans to this day. Steele

(2003) reports that throughout the 1990s, the national college dropout rate for African Americans

continued to be 20 to 25 percent higher than for whites. Additionally, nearly all aspects of

underperformance, from graduation rates to college grades, continue to persist among African

Americans to this day. Issues such as lower academic performance, higher crime rates, and

higher rates of suspension continue to destroy the African American community. Despite these

mandated

plague

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

3

adversities, African Americans remain resilient to these changes and find ways to overcome their

obstacles. Even in today's vastly expanding world, African Americans' resilience should be

revered and respected despite the many risks they encounter.

Statement of the Problem

In 2015 and 2016, the overall life expectancy for the United States (US) population

decreased from 76.3 to 76.1 years (Khazan, 2017). This drop was attributed to an increase in the

death rate for African American males. Furthermore, previous literature demonstrates that high

threats to one's social wellbeing increase stress hormones such as proinflammatory cytokine

activity and cortisol levels (Dickerson, Gruenewald & Kemeny, 2004). This stress over time has

been shown to coincide with a lack of support and more psychological problems (Schmeelk-

Cone & Zimmerman, 2003). Despite these statistics, there is a lack of research examining the

relationship between school satisfaction, school safety, and levels of happiness among school-

age African American youth. My thesis intends to examine these factors using historical and

ecological perspectives. The findings of this study will identify interventions to promote

healthier academic outcomes for African American youth. Additionally, it will assist in

addressing racial health discrepancies between African American youth and other majority

populations.

Purpose of Study

This study aims to address the hindrances that African American boys face both

economically and environmentally in their pursuit to promote healthier academic outcomes for

African American youth. Furthermore, it will shed light on the many accomplishments the

African American community has achieved despite inadequate circumstances. Routinely,

African Americans are undermined and disproportionately singled out despite their many

justintegrate -

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

4

contributions to American society. However, societal circumstances have routinely pushed

African Americans to the brink of resolve numerous times, yet we have been able to withstand

them. Finally, this study examines disparities in the educational system between African

American and Caucasian students.

Importance of Study/Significance

Discrimination and stigma are complex and can affect health in numerous ways. One way

is through day-to-day encounters with microaggressions, racial slurs, and other subtle actions

that elicit fear and tension. Another way is through more extensive and more severe acts of

racism, such as being fired from a job, random racial profiling, and unfair treatment in the

healthcare system (Murray, 2016). Lastly, being profiled and harassed by individuals leads to

continuous anxiety and worry, contributing to anticipatory behavior that affects individual habits

(Murray, 2016). Researchers have given these concepts various names: Daily Discrimination

refers to more minor everyday discriminatory incidents (e.g., microaggressions), Major

Discrimination (e.g., police harassment) refers to more substantial lifetime discriminatory

episodes, Anticipated Discrimination refers to the fear of further discriminatory treatment to

come (Dickerson, Gruenewald & Kemeny, 2004). Previous literature has not compared the

impact of various types of discrimination on self-reported general health to determine how the

various types of discrimination overlap and how they are distinct. This thesis primarily focuses

on academic experiences using data from the California Healthy Kids Survey, it is essential to

acknowledge the broader health implications of discrimination against African American youth.

Prior research, such as the Child Health and Development Disparities study, has investigated

how discrimination affects health. These effects can manifest physiologically and emotionally

through poor healthcare quality and promoting unhealthy behaviors. Different types of

Theabstract includedHispanic

threatening

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

5

discrimination are commonly reported by African American youth including significant, daily,

and anticipated discrimination, however it is important to consider how perceptions of health and

well being compare across different race and ethnic identities. Though not the primary focus of

this thesis, understanding the multifaceted impact of discrimination on health provides an

essential context for examining the academic experiences of African American youth within the

educational system.

Discrimination and Health

Discrimination is a social stressor seen as an unfair or unjustified socially structured

action (Abramson et al., 2015). This stressor increases cortisol levels and causes a fight-or-flight

response. Dickerson, Gruenewald, and Kemeny (2004) argue that high threats to one's social

wellbeing increase stress hormones such as proinflammatory cytokine activity and cortisol

levels. Continual reception of these threats reduces one's overall level of general health.

However, physiological effects are not the only way that this can occur. Discrimination can also

affect individuals in that they receive inadequate healthcare. Furthermore, it can affect

individuals directly and indirectly by promoting unhealthy behaviors such as poor diet, smoking,

and avoidance of healthcare (Carlisle & Murray, in press).

Physiological and Emotional Effects of Discrimination

Discrimination and health have been intertwined strongly over the centuries through

unfair treatment, racial tensions, and inequality. Previous literature has offered strong evidence

that racial discrimination produces stress, which has direct physiological effects on health. This

includes emotional effects and direct physical stress. For example, one study found that racism

and discriminatory treatment accelerated aging at a biological level, consequently linking racism

and disease risk (Chae et al., 2014). Another study linked discrimination to heightened blood

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

6

pressure, which can decrease wellbeing among African Americans (Deitch et al., 2003).

Discrimination can also induce negative emotions, loneliness, and lower overall life satisfaction

(Sutin et al., 2015). These emotions can affect an individual's life from young adulthood to old

age and their health and wellbeing. Discrimination's emotional impact also carries over by

promoting instances of depressive symptoms, major depression, and psychological distress in an

individual (Hwang & Goto, 2008). Perception of discriminatory events also plays a role in

health. An analysis of 134 samples of perceived discrimination studies found a significant

adverse effect on both the mental and physical health of individuals; perceived discriminatory

events were linked with hypertension, self-reported general health, and breast cancer (Pascoe &

Richman, 2009).

Theoretical Framework(s)

A child's development requires the efforts of parents, teachers, relatives, and others. From

an ecological lens, psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory of human development

sets the foundation for ecological systems theory. He coined the idea of systems such as the

microsystem to the macrosystem (Harkonen, 2001). As a result, these systems have created a

path for the scholarly development of a child and emphasized the importance of parental

involvement as the stepping stone of this ecological theory.

This theory has been proven vital to a child's success. The microsystem, which involves

parents, family, and school, is the most critical system in Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory.

Within this microsystem, a relationship exists between parental involvement levels and a child's

academic success (Wilder, 2014). Despite parents being the root of a child's academic

development, the level of involvement varies, with factors such as single parenthood or non-

residential status often reducing parental engagement in a child's school life (Peters et al., 2007).

Lamination development

sina.IEIg from hereon

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

7

This disparity in parental involvement can contribute to educational inequalities. Wilder (2014)

states, "Parental involvement has been known to impact students' academic outcomes positively.

Parents change their child's trajectory simply by engaging in their child's educational plan and

investing in their future." This quote highlights the impact of the presence of parents in a child's

life. It also shows the power of a parental investment that can be shown using words, actions, or

money.

Regarding Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory, the microsystem is the most crucial,

involving parents, family, and school as the primary influences on a child's growth and

development. Within this intimate microsystem, parental involvement is a significant factor in

academic success. A direct relationship exists between the levels of parental engagement,

whether through guidance, support, or active participation, and positive outcomes in a child's

educational environment (Epstein & Dauber, 1991; Wilder, 2014). The degree of involvement

can vary considerably, impacting a child's academic trajectory.

Despite parents being the root of a child's success, the level of involvement of parents

matters in the rearing of the child. For example, if a parent can assist a child with homework,

positive feelings about learning occur within the child and the teacher in the classroom (Epstein

& Dauber, 1991). These positive experiences are excellent for everyone within the microsystem,

yet the problem is that these positive experiences are not consistent across all students. Peters

and colleagues (2007) conducted a thorough survey using responses from over 5,032 parents

regarding their involvement in their child's academics. Their survey found that only "around half

(51%) of parents felt very involved in their child's school life: and that lone parents and non-

resident parents were both less likely than average to feel very involved." This gap is further

emphasized by "one in three parents (32%) saying they help their children with their homework

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

8

every time, while a further 26% do so most times" and lastly, "around one in three parents (35%)

had helped out in class or at school at some point". These alarming statistics highlight the

differences in treatment that every child faces.

The dichotomy behind education and parental involvement are two aspects of education

that both offer an exciting outlook on the factors that affect a child's growth. Despite the

resources being available in schools, a child's success is also grounded in the willingness of a

parent to be available during their child's learning experience. Nevertheless, their availability can

vary depending on their job, current lifestyle, and moral willingness to engage with their child.

This engagement can be through homework assistance, involvement in school programs, and the

listening skills of the parent (Wilder, 2014). Wilder (2014) also suggests that involvement in

back-to-school nights and sporting events helps to build rapport with the student and school

community. These activities help to nurture the microsystem arrangement and foster an organic

relationship between family, school, and the student.

Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory also relies not only on the microsystem but

also the mesosystem, exosystem (extended family and neighbors), macrosystem (attitudes and

ideologies of the culture), and chronosystem (environmental changes that occur over time

(Härkönen, 2001). As a result, the school system exists within the exosystem and macrosystem

due to its relationship with local policies, social services and the attitudes surrounding it. The

school system also works intimately with macrosystems such as socioeconomic status (SES),

which also play an intimate role with parents in the school system.

Definitions/Terminology

Racism: Racism is a global hierarchy of superiority and inferiority along the line of the

human that has been politically, culturally, and economically produced and reproduced for

m

vir

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

9

centuries by the institutions of the "capitalist/patriarchal western-centric/Christian-centric

modern/colonial world system" (Grosfoguel, 2011)

Discrimination: consists of actions, practices, or policies that are—in some appropriate

sense—based on the (perceived) social group to which those discriminated against belong and

that the relevant groups must be socially salient in that they structure interaction in meaningful

social contexts (Lippert-Rasmussen, 2006)

Resilience: Shahroozi (2021) defines resilience as "positive outcomes, adaptation or

attainment of developmental milestones or competencies in the face of significant risk, adversity

or stress." It underscores the importance of understanding how African American youths

navigate challenges and develop strategies to thrive in educational settings, highlighting the need

for interventions that support their holistic development and safety within the school

environment

Ecological Systems Theory: Urie Bronfenbrenner formulated the Ecological Systems

Theory to explain how social environments affect children's development. This theory

emphasizes the importance of studying children in multiple environments, known as ecological

systems, to understand their development.

Research Questions

1) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report a lower level of school safety compared to their Hispanic and White

counterparts?

2) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report lower school satisfaction than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

better than

Caucasian

pitiful

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

10

3) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report lower happiness than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

Conclusion

Given the context of disparities in education and health among African Americans, there

must be a greater understanding of discriminatory treatment and its effects on health and

education. By examining African American youth in schools and their environmental risks, this

study hopes to understand better how people understand racial events toward African American

communities and beyond.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

11

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

In this chapter, the literature review explores previous research contextualizing the

experiences of African American students in the education system. It examines issues around

racial discrimination in schools, including inequalities stemming from differential treatment,

biases tied to socioeconomic status, language barriers, and discrepancies in academic outcomes.

The discussion then turns to arguments for embracing diverse school environments to nourish

critical thinking, access professional connections, and mitigate student vulnerabilities.

Additionally, this chapter discusses risk and resilience patterns among African American learners

pursuing academics, highlighting formidable obstacles faced but noting substantial persistence

despite challenges. Similarly, it delves into prevalent issues surrounding racial trauma in

education contexts and strategies to provide affected students with coping outlets and counter

discriminatory practices. Collectively, the review situates the current study within broader

conversations on persisting inequities and complex dynamics influencing African American

student success.

Racism and Education

According to Arneback & Jämte (2022), education attainment is the critical developmental

outcome widely assessing successful growth and development. They stated that racism is often

seen as a historical/and or individual-oriented problem in schools. However, discrepancies have

been seen through equalities presented to them through inequalities due to differential treatment,

differences in socioeconomic practice and educational outcomes and more.

Inequalities Due to Differential Treatment and Socioeconomic Status

LYNN

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

12

Racial differences in academic accomplishment represent egregious and apparent racial

and ethnic disparities. Racial discrimination in the education system takes different forms and

sometimes goes unnoticed. However, victims of persisting discrimination may portray hostility

that they express in implicit and explicit forms, which society perceives as microaggressions that

stigmatize these minority groups. They do not receive the help they need on time, widening

disparities in the education sector. A study by Quintana & Mahgoub. (2016) found that racial

discrimination was executed by teachers who treated students' education abilities differently

depending on their racial and ethnic backgrounds throughout the academic year. Likewise, Trent

et al. (2019) found that educational disparities in the United States are portrayed by the poor quality

of schooling, where children from poor socioeconomic backgrounds are marginalized,

contributing to uneven opportunities to access education. The authors also find that occupational

and economic abilities aggravate substantial differences in academic performance.

Inequalities Contributed by Differences in Response to Educational Practice

Racial differences in the education system manifest as differences in response to education

practices based on racial and ethnic status. This means students from different racial backgrounds

perform based on their ability to respond to similar educational situations. This can go unnoticed,

although it is integral to understanding why disparities persist (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). By

drawing from health disparities, they explain that the reason why health disparities persist is that

people from different racial or ethnic backgrounds receive the same type of healthcare but respond

differently to it. Educational practices or approaches might be the same for all students but lead to

different outcomes for students from various ethnic and racial backgrounds. The definition of

educational disparities used by the Task Force encompasses situations where educational outcomes

differ among ethnic and racial minority children due to variations in how they interact with the

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

13

educational system. In other words, it's not just about what happens in schools but also how

students from different backgrounds respond to what happens in schools, which can contribute to

the disparities in educational achievement.

Inequalities in Educational Outcomes

Although American institutions have been implementing substantial efforts to resolve this

national crisis for the last six decades, the Nation's Report Card (2003) data disclose that academic

educational disparities continue to exist and have snowballed widely in the last decades. The

authors find that some groups, like African American, Latino, Native American, and some Asian

American students, tend to do worse in school from when they start in preschool until they finish

high school. They are also less likely to graduate from high school, get into special programs for

talented students, or go to college compared to White and some other Asian American students.

For example, Latino students are almost four times more likely to drop out of school compared to

White students, and African American students are three times more likely to be suspended or

expelled. Many of these minority students still graduate from high school at a rate just above 60%,

and in some big city schools where most students are low-income and minorities, the graduation

rates are even lower than 50%. Among the same racial groups, boys tend to do worse in school

than girls and multiracial young people say they face more physical threats in school than others

(Persky, Daane & Jin, 2003)

Reasons For Embracing Racially Diverse School Environment

Racial composition is essential in the education system as it explains how embracing

diversity in the learning environment can influence other aspects of students' social experience and

academic accomplishment. Findings by Arneback & Jämte (2022) disclose that schools embracing

racial and ethnic differences stimulate the development of critical thinking skills among students

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

14

as it allows students to discuss social issues affecting them, with each student offering an opinion

based on where they come from. Therefore, exposure to different opinions in a class environment

strengthens students' ability to think critically about complex issues facing their community.

Additionally, attending racially diverse schools strengthens students' access to professional and

social networks, especially when transitioning to postsecondary education. A racially diverse

school environment provides students, especially those from marginalized ethnic backgrounds,

ample opportunities to develop professional and social connections that are important for their

future careers (Evans-Winters & Hines, 2020).

Racially diverse schools inherently reduce students' feelings of vulnerability, irrespective

of specific staff actions. In their study, Lopez (2020) researched the impacts of peer harassment at

school. When students perceive themselves as vulnerable and feel unsafe due to peer harassment,

their emotional and cognitive resources are often compromised, making it difficult for them to

perform well academically. In racially diverse schools, where power is distributed across multiple

ethnic groups without a single numerical majority, students may feel less vulnerable. This

balancing highlights the positive impact of being part of a community with balanced power

dynamics, reducing isolation and vulnerability to peer harassment. Such an environment can

significantly enhance overall wellbeing and academic performance for students. Overall, the racial

composition of schools can influence critical thinking abilities, enhance access to social and

professional networks, and reduce feelings of vulnerability among students, highlighting the

importance of diversity in educational environments. Schools should prioritize fostering open

communication to connect with learners to create a space where they will feel valued. It is also

essential to tailor educational programs to provide room for multifaceted discussion to help

students share diverse opinions and insights to benefit them in the long run.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

15

Risk and Resilience

African American students are vulnerable to various challenges, including adapting to new

cultures, social isolation, unfamiliarity with the curriculum, and financial challenges obstructing

their ability to continue pursuing education opportunities (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). Regardless,

Lopez (2020) argues that most students have shown substantial resilience to overcome these

challenges and graduate from higher education.

Challenges Facing African American Students Pursuing Education in White-Dominated

Schools

Non-white students, especially African Americans, experience a wide variety of challenges

that white students do not encounter. These challenges include adapting to new cultures,

unfamiliarity with the education system, and social isolation from the existing stereotypes (Hunter-

Johnson, 2022). While some scholars focus on exploring challenges experienced by students from

a social perspective, others approach the issue by exploring language issues, differences in

instructional culture and classroom setting, and mostly skin color awareness. Other challenges

include confusion and disconnection subjected to them at different social value systems, loss of

social status and power, and identity issues contributed by their being classified as a minority,

which makes them target victims of the associated stigma, which further hinders their

employability (O'Leary et al., 2020).

According to Hunter-Johnson (2022), African American students are expected to blend

into learning environments characterized by a generational gap between them and American

natives. This can increase feelings of differences as they have different cultural exposure from

their fellow students born and raised in white cultures. Prevalence of such differences may even

lead to the perception that others view them as inferior, adding to their emotional burden.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

16

Moreover, when transitioning to international nontraditional adult learners, it is essential to note

that they often require assistance with financial challenges due to the high costs of studying abroad.

These financial burdens can impact their social and emotional wellbeing, potentially hindering

their academic progress. It is crucial to address these financial pressures to support these learners

in completing their academic programs. The outcome of these challenges is increased stress, which

persists throughout their academic journey, and many experience challenges qualifying for exams

and securing sustainable networking and mentorship opportunities. Once they complete their

higher education, they still must face the challenges of seeking employment and job security.

Persistence Of Non-American Students Pursuing Education In the United States

Despite various obstacles, most African American students demonstrate resilience by

attaining advanced academic credentials and managing a healthy work-life equilibrium. The

findings of Krsmanovic's (2022) study indicate that there are various factors behind nontraditional

international students choosing American-centered educational institutions. They include

opportunities to improve English, financial support, academic and professional growth drive,

interaction in different intercultural settings, future job prospects, better living, politics and

economically stable life. The motivations behind the actions of these individuals create a solid

base that allows international students to be ambitious and strive hard to do well in academics.

One should bear in mind the fact that the motivational patterns among African American learners

differ from those of their local counterparts, stemming from significant variations in their life

experience (including personal and professional ones) and various factors that determine the living

standards, taking into account countries of origin (Spencer, 2016). Spencer (2016) points out that

African American students encounter significant challenges in American-oriented institutions,

unlike many other groups pursuing education in Western-oriented settings. Despite the challenges,

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

17

they have shown remarkable resilience, supported by their desire to overcome obstacles in life,

strive for academic success, and contribute positively to their communities and society. African

American students rely on goals such as enhanced English-language skills, a desire for academic

and professional development, exposure to diverse intercultural contexts, prospects for future

career advancement, and the promise of improved social status to remain resilient to challenges

facing them daily while pursuing education in America (Penner et al., 2013).

Racial Trauma

The negative impacts of racism are well documented, including experiences of racial

trauma. Therefore, there is a need to implement interventions to help spread awareness and

practical strategies to prevent African American racism, given its harmful impacts.

In recent decades, the rate of racial trauma has tremendously increased in higher learning

institutions. The current form of racism has changed from overt acts to subtler, complex racist, and

ambiguous incidents at institutional and cultural levels. The events intensify the physiological,

emotional, and psychological response when various public humiliations are involved. This leads

to students who are targets of overt, public racism on campus feeling frustrated and detached and

starting to develop doubts concerning their academic capabilities and challenges with their identity

development (Mosley, 2022). The kind of relationship between the student and the perpetrator of

racism may have a crucial role in how trauma is ultimately experienced. For example, Mosley

(2022) argues that if the perpetrator of racism is a teacher, the power dynamics and authority in

the student-teacher relationship can significantly impact how the student experiences and

processes the trauma. This builds upon Shalka's work on trauma, which aims to integrate racial

trauma into student development theory, recognizing the profound and debilitating effects of

racism on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC).

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

18

Self-authorship refers to the ability of individuals to define their own identity, beliefs, and

social relations, transitioning from reliance on external authorities to internal capacity. Through

self-authorship, it is possible to explore how individuals evolve in their ability to define their

identity, beliefs, and social relations, transitioning from reliance on external authorities to internal

capacity. This approach divides this aspect into three dimensions. It helps individuals to reevaluate

who they are, how they see themselves in a racialized manner, and their sense of belonging in

society (Henderson et al., 2022). Individuals may be prompted to discard stereotypes and create

their sense of self through racial trauma. The second dimension is the cognitive/epistemological

dimension, where racial trauma affects students' understanding of how they perceive the world and

make the meaning of their social environment. Engaging in traumatic occasions can lead to the

realization that their perspectives differ from others, which may entail extra developmental tasks

due to the exceptional interpersonal challenges of trauma. The students may grapple with safety,

vulnerability, and agency questions in disclosing their post-trauma selves.

The third dimension is interpersonal, which plays a crucial role in exploring how the

individuals affected by racial trauma may reconsider their association with others. Racial trauma

can lead to self-isolation, isolation, and push-and-pull behavior in interpersonal relations. Students

can seek comfort and deep understanding through kinship connections with others who have

undergone similar trauma. This sense inspires individuals to serve their community as advocates

and mentors, paying forward the support they received and embodying their racial or ethnic

identity.

Strategies To Diminish Racial Trauma

Racial trauma can be diminished using various strategies, such as racial socialization, often

studied in the context of parents educating their children about race, culture, and identity. It helps

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

19

children be aware and take necessary precautions to deal with racism. Racial socialization supports

coping responses such as teaching children how to respond to racial discrimination, providing them

with strategies to navigate challenging situations, and fostering a strong sense of racial identity

and pride. In contrast to families and parents of color, white educators and parents are most likely

to involve themselves in racial socialization practices that enhance the disruption of racism

(Hatchimonji et al., 2022). Therefore, any learning institution aiming to combat racism must build

racial socialization skills in all white members of the institution. This will help the school to

increase constructive interracial interactions and promote productive racial socialization within the

school compound.

On the other hand, trauma-informed strategies assist teachers and adults in identifying

students who may be undergoing challenging ways with kindness and give them another chance

at healing besides being designed to deal with racism or the stress and trauma related to race.

Schools have created trauma-informed programs over the last twenty years to help children cope

with trauma, anxiety, and challenging experiences that can harm their development. According to

Henderson et al. (2019), these strategies focus on strengthening the existing support and helping

students build skills to handle the current trauma. Nevertheless, these methods can sometimes label

Brown and Black students as having challenges because of the unfair conditions created by racism.

The strengths of trauma-informed approaches should be used to help students adapt to and heal

from the trauma and stress related to racism, all while aiming to stop the racism and unfair

conditions it creates.

Racial trauma in the education sector plays an integral role in hindering African American

individuals from receiving the quality education they desire. However, implementing efforts such

as racial trauma and trauma-informed strategies will enable all stakeholders, including teachers

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

20

and students, to identify victims of racial discrimination and provide them with an environment to

cope effectively.

Environmental and Historical Impediments

Racial discrimination against African American students has been a systemic issue

historically. These practices persist due to continued reliance on policies that do little to address

racial disparities existing in American schools. Environmental and historical obstacles hindering

the American education system from embracing an education system free from racial

discrimination targeting African American students will be discussed.

Evidence from the United States Census Bureau pinpointed that racial minorities were

projected to be 57% of the American population as of 2020 (Mills, 2020). Regardless, fewer

students enrolled in higher learning institutions after federal educational policies prohibited

individuals from racial minority groups from attaining higher education. Although efforts to

diversify academic attendance have been made, they completely erase the history of racial

discrimination against African American students, as discriminatory admission policies exist and

unfairly exclude students. The persistence of this culture of exclusion creates an unwelcoming

climate for these students, increasing attrition and disengagement.

Since the colonial period, federal educational policies prevented African Americans from

accessing high-quality education. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) supported the appropriateness of

racial segregation in public institutions, stating that it did not violate the American Constitution

only if they focused on providing students with equal quality education. However, maintaining

equality in education is not easy when the entire system is corrupted by systemic exclusion and

racism of minor groups. For instance, Southern Black schools during the 1950s would only receive

60% of the per-student funds from Southern white schools, meaning that black students would go

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

21

on for months without proper access to primary needs and facilities such as electricity, water,

libraries, gymnasiums, and cafeterias (Evans-Winters, & Hines, 2020). The presence of these

amenities meant that black students would only access substandard education. However, the civil

rights activists and the NAACP during the 1950s did their best to challenge these racial segregation

laws in public schools. In 1954, "the separate but equal" principle was overruled by the Brown v.

Board of Education. According to the Supreme Court, laws allowing racial segregation in public

learning institutions were unconstitutional.

For centuries, American African students were forced to enroll primarily in white boarding

schools where they were not allowed to speak their first language or engage in cultural activities.

This forced assimilation contributed to the systemic dilution of students' traditions and culture. In

addition, the students were banned from participating in college life, primarily in white institutions,

which empowered students to form organizations focusing on celebrating the experiences of

African American students. These formations allowed students to socialize, assemble, and seek

solutions to overcome the harsh repercussions of enrolling in predominantly white schools. During

this time, organizations such as the Black Student Union were formed to allow students to preserve

their cultural traditions and focus on campaigning for measures that would enable them to validate

their racial and ethnic identity.

Consequently, implementing discriminatory policies affects low-income students through

standardized evaluations such as the SAT, which was introduced in 1962. The negative side of

these standardized tests is that they have played a central role in disqualifying many Black students

during admission. However, a recent study by Reynolds et al. (2021) revealed that the SAT is not

an ideal determiner of college success, given that it tends to favor the languages communicated by

white American students from affluent backgrounds and those from Eurocentric culture. Today,

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

22

racial segregation persists, given that African American students attend predominantly white

schools with buildings named after white men who openly supported beliefs of genocide, slavery,

and the inferiority of African Americans. At the same time, hate crimes remain the face of many

learning institutions. For instance, Syracuse University in 2019 reported twelve different incidents

of anti-Semitic and racist graffiti, which attracted protests from students, and the FBI also became

involved (Sasso & David, 2022). Furthermore, racial exclusion manifests in curriculum

development as most American schools have adopted educational programs that teach students the

significance and history of racial and ethnic minorities. Additionally, several institutions are under-

resourced and underfunded, highlighting how Black institutions are undervalued in the American

context.

Overall, there is an urgent need for learning institutions to review the exclusionary

practices exercised in school settings throughout history as they reflect the persisting racial

segregation experienced by African American students. Racism is still a common issue in the

American education system. While increasing diversity is a substantial goal, it makes little effort

to eliminate the existing institutional barriers that obstruct access and educational opportunities

for African American students. Therefore, higher education institutions should collaborate with

scholars and policy developers to understand the root cause of inequities in access to quality

education, which currently inhibits students' academic success in the African American

community.

Racial Disparities in Education

Racial gaps across educational outcomes, including standardized test scores, grades,

graduation rates, discipline, college enrollment and completion rates, reveal vast inequities in

achievement and attainment between minority and White students at all academic levels. These

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

23

persistent differences stem from interlocking social, economic, and institutional factors that

collectively sustain structural racism within schools.

Causes of Education Disparities

In a study by Williams & Cooper (2019), Socioeconomic status and race are strongly

interconnected, with minorities facing disproportionate poverty. This economic disadvantage

directly harms academic achievement. Moreover, biases tied to socioeconomic status contribute

to unequal education. Teachers frequently perceive minority students from low-income

backgrounds as less capable and motivated, propagating divergent expectations and treatment.

Financial hardships also limit minority students' access to supplemental learning opportunities,

furthering divides.

Eurocentric curricula and predominately White teaching forces alienate minority

students, challenging their identity development, sense of belonging, skill building, and

academic performance (Dickerson, Gruenewald, and Kemeny, 2004). Racial biases embedded in

standardized assessments also disadvantage non-native English speakers. Marginalization of

minority students' cultural frames of reference and experiences in academics exacerbates

estrangement and underachievement.

School segregation concentrates on poverty and racial isolation, severely impacting

minority student outcomes (Henderson et al., 2019). Relatedly, inequitable funding and staffing

distributions between minority-serving and predominately White schools deprive the former of

essential resources, entrenching achievement gaps (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). Ongoing

segregation and unequal resource allocation sustain racial hierarchy.

Socioeconomic Status

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

24

Beyond material factors, biases tied to socioeconomic status contribute to racial

disparities in education. Teachers frequently perceive minority students from low-income

backgrounds through deficit lenses as less capable and motivated, leading to divergent

expectations and treatment that propagate inequality (Al Shamsi et al., 2020). Financial

hardships also limit disadvantaged minorities' access to supplemental learning opportunities

available to more affluent peers, furthering divides. While differences exist even among

economically advantaged subgroups, indicating additional factors, socioeconomic barriers

remain a primary driver of racial inequities.

Language Proficiency

Limited English proficiency among racial minority students, especially English language

learners, is associated with depressed academic performance, graduation rates, and overall

educational attainment (Penner et al., 2013). Racial biases embedded in standardized language

assessments further disadvantage non-native speakers (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). While numerous

elements contribute to achievement gaps, language barriers and culturally-biased tests exacerbate

racial stratification. Even minoritized native English speakers contend with whitewashed

linguistic expectations marginalizing cultural dialects.

Approaches to Address Racial Disparity in Education

Government-driven initiatives around integration, equitable funding formulas, early

interventions, and accountability measures help mitigate disparities systemically (Hernández &

Harris, 2022). Embedding culturally responsive teaching practices through diverse curricular

materials, antiracist pedagogies, and educator training promotes minority achievement

(Hatchimonji, 2022). Considering racism's psychological toll, increased mental health support,

trauma-informed practices, and disaggregated data analysis enable healthier school climates that

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

25

embrace minority students' lived experiences (Persky, Daane, & Jin, 2003). Additionally,

outreach programs prepare disadvantaged minorities for higher education through academic

enrichment, admissions and financial guidance, and campus exposure, while school-community

partnerships build cultural bridges and address challenges holistically (Arneback & Jämte, 2022;

Krsmanovic, 2022). Sustained, multifaceted efforts challenging historical biases are imperative.

Current Interventions

Incidents of racial disparities in the education sector are increasing among non-white

students, especially African Americans and Hispanics, making them vulnerable to unequal

opportunities and experiences. Different strategies and interventions have been set in place to

resolve racial injustices in the education system in the long run to neutralize their impacts. These

interventions range from policy reforms to introducing changes in education and society

engagement efforts. Such a comprehensive approach promotes equitable representation, access,

and outcomes for these students.

The first intervention is policy reforms through desegregation policies, affirmative action,

and equity legislation, which the government aims to maximize to resolve historical challenges

facing non-white students. Affirmative action aims to offer the underrepresented ethnic and

minority racial groups preferential treatment in employment and education, thus enhancing

opportunities (Anderson et al., 2019). On the other hand, court-mandated desegregation policies

aim at creating racially integrated environments that neutralize segregation. In contrast, equity

legislation policies aim to push school districts to oversee even distribution of resources, especially

in low-income societies.

Another effort is integrating culturally responsive teaching methods, which suggested

positive results, is by O'Leary et al.and colleagues (2020) to improve educational outcomes for all

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

26

students by immersing them in cultural experiences and backgrounds of different cultures. This

serves as an essential foundation for the students to understand how they can respond to the unique

needs of other cultures in the classroom. Recent studies identify that these stereotypes in the

education system have a more remarkable ability to influence how students treat their classmates

and perceive themselves. Therefore, implementing anti-bias education programs aims to raise

awareness of these biases and prejudices among teachers, administrators, and students and

encourages cultivating a culture of inclusivity, respect, and empathy in the classroom.

African American students are vulnerable to unique challenges and stressors due to racial

discrimination, and efforts have been made to incorporate mental health services and counseling

into the school curriculum. The aim is to provide victims of racial disparity with a safe and non-

judgmental opportunity to discuss racial challenges facing them and encourage them to work

together to resolve them in an empathic and confidential environment. Moreover, efforts to collect

and analyze student academic accomplishments play a central role in helping teachers identify the

source and solution of these racial disparities. According to Ottwein (2020), providing African

Americans with equal educational opportunities through gifted programs will play an integral role

in lifting barriers to information dissemination and admission criteria. Several African American

schools expanded their course offerings, ensured training teachers on cultural diversity and

inclusion regularly, and how to tailor their education programs to diminish opportunities for biases

and foster a collaborative community sustainably. Together, these efforts provide an equitable,

inclusive, and supportive learning environment, which is integral in closing the gaps and instilling

a fair education system.

Abolishing racial injustice practices in education is a multifaceted issue demanding the

implementation of long-term efforts to sustain stakeholder commitment. Combining these

citation

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

27

interventions provides an opportunity for adjustment to the changing landscapes and supports

ongoing evaluation of supportive environments for students from all ethnic and racial

backgrounds.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

28

CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

Few studies have identified the risk and resilience factors among African American youth

in education. A study by Spencer and colleagues (1994) assessed how indicators of context, self,

and action related to measures of risk and resilient outcomes in schools in three different

samples. Overall, their sample found that African American youths' experiences of their parent

school involvement predicted a composite of their self-system processes, predicting the subjects'

school engagement reports. Another study by Myers and Taylor (1998) found that African

American youth living in urban poverty run a disproportionately higher risk for adverse

psychosocial and educational outcomes than more affluent African American and Caucasian

children. Although previous research has been conducted on resilience and risk, limited research

is available on the relationship between academic success, health risks and stress among African

American youth in schools.

Research Questions

The present study plans to identify appropriate interventions to improve and promote

healthier academic outcomes for African American youth. Quantitative analytical approaches are

integrated into the research to design questionnaires. These include;

1) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report a lower level of school safety compared to their Hispanic and White

counterparts?

2) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report lower school satisfaction than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

p

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

29

3) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles

County Report lower happiness than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

Measurement

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is offered to students starting in grade 5

(age 10) and up in grades 5, 7, 9 and 11 every other year. It is not a random sample; districts

choose to participate or receive state TUPE funding to administer it. The survey includes

sections on school climate, safety, student wellness, health risks, school connectedness,

protective factors and violence. Additional supplemental and demographic sections allow

customization and identification of vulnerabilities. Psychometric analyses by CHKS (n.d.) found

the CHKS meets reliability standards with Cronbach's alpha levels between .73 and .89 across

subscales. Criterion and construct validity were also demonstrated through logical relationships

between crucial risk areas. Any supplemental validity data in the CHKS data request will also be

reported. As participation is voluntary, results may reflect districts more actively addressing

student needs, limiting generalizability. This potential self-selection bias will be discussed as a

study limitation.

Site

The study takes place across all public schools in Los Angeles County. About 70% of

school districts in California participate in the CHKS. Most districts administer the CHKS every

other year, but about one-third of districts administer it each year.

Sample

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) uses a stratified cluster random sampling

method to sample students across California. This means that the sample is representative of the

state's population in terms of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic region, and other

Gand questions

good

good

usesextantdatacollectedfrom

Include into relevant toyour study sample sizefor LACounty males

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

30

vital characteristics. The sampling process involves dividing the state into clusters, randomly

selecting a subset of schools from each cluster, and then selecting a random sample of students

from those schools. The total sample size for the CHKS is approximately 200,000 students,

designed to ensure that the results are accurate and representative of the state's youth population.

Recruitment

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is voluntary. One class period is needed to

take the survey. The average student can complete the online Core Module in 15 minutes or less.

Ninety-five percent of students complete the online Core Module in 30 minutes or less. State law

requires the parents, at a minimum, to be notified of a CHKS administration and be offered the

opportunity to grant or withhold consent (CALSCHS, 2023).

Instrumentation

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) in Core Elementary School Survey is a

comprehensive assessment tool for elementary school students. It begins by collecting

demographic data, such as age, grade, gender, and ethnicity, providing context for analysis. The

survey evaluates physical health, including nutrition, physical activity, and sleep patterns, while

identifying potential support areas. Emotional and mental health is also explored, shedding light

on stress and emotional wellbeing. Addressing substance use, bullying, and safety within and

outside school settings is crucial for intervention. The survey measures students' sense of

connectedness and support at school and home, aiding in understanding their social and

emotional wellbeing. The school environment, including climate and health resources, may be

considered. The survey may also explore students' social and environmental factors, like living

conditions and community resources. Collectively, these components offer a comprehensive

add table items surveysamplesize

2021 2

gaffed

has questions about Thesurvey includes items on

Rewritetojustdescribe what items or scales are on the survey you don't need to

explain or justify the items

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

31

view of students' wellbeing. They provide essential data for informed decision-making and the

development of targeted intervention strategies to enhance student's overall health and safety.

Data Collection

Data was collected via a coded Likert scale survey, which was then analyzed to identify

trends, patterns, and areas of concern. This data can be used at various levels, including

individual school assessments, district-wide comparisons, and statewide assessments, to inform

decision-making and intervention strategies.

Data Analysis

The three research questions selected for analysis using the California Healthy Kids

Survey (CHKS) data center examine critical aspects of the school experiences of African

American male youth in Los Angeles County public compared to their Hispanic/Latinx and

White peers.

The first research question focuses specifically on school safety, asking: Do African

American male youth report lower perceptions of school safety compared to Hispanic/Latinx and

White male youth based on the CHKS? Assessing racial/ethnic group differences in perceived

school safety is essential, considering past literature demonstrating that discriminatory treatment

and lack of belongingness in school can negatively impact minority students' wellbeing (Evans-

Winters & Hines, 2020). Due to historical marginalization, African American youth may view

the same school climates as less secure. Their responses illuminated invisible threats influencing

their educational experiences.

Likewise, the second research question concentrated on school satisfaction, examining if

African American male youth report lower satisfaction levels than their counterparts. Satisfaction

measures gauge effective engagement with the academic environment. Understanding variations

Extant data the

e

WhatHad Molested

Joked to

natives justify

Mw Explain

inch

againjust list survey item asthe of

students who responded to the item

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

32

can identify specific student needs. Previous studies found race and gender shape satisfaction; for

instance, Hunter-Johnson (2022) found that African-American students exhibit less trust in

teachers and are less satisfied with discipline policies than white peers. Investigating satisfaction

by race and gender in LA schools promised to reveal intervention points.

Moreover, the third question explored racial/ethnic differences in reported unhappiness

levels, an indicator of emotional wellbeing. Psychological health interplays closely with

academic outcomes, so examining discrepancies provided insights. Prior evidence does suggest

depressed psychological wellbeing among African American youth stemming from social

inequities and exclusion (Lopez, 2020). Assessing unhappiness gives a proxy indication of this

critical issue.

These three research focal areas collectively elucidated variances between African

American male youth and peers in aspects closely tied to minority students' experiences,

engagement, and success within education settings. Examining racial disparities utilizing the

CHKS provided direction for enhancing support services, climate interventions, inclusion

strategies, and policies to promote equitable opportunities for student health across groups.

i

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

33

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS

While assessing the results of a study through ANOVA, several assumptions need to be

met. These include the independence of observations, the normality of residuals, and the

homogeneity of variances. The hypothetical questions in the CHKS study guided the data

collection process to ensure the independence of observations. The normality of residuals was

also assessed through statistical tests or visual inspection of the data distribution. On the

contrary, the homogeneity of variances was checked using post-hoc tests to ensure that the

variance of the dependent variable was consistent across groups. Addressing these assumptions

in the research design and analysis enhanced the validity and reliability of the ANOVA results,

providing a solid foundation for drawing meaningful conclusions from the data. Descriptive data

is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sample Size for Study Items by Race/Ethnicity

Item

Range Black/AA Hispanic/Latinx White/Caucasian Total

Safety

1-6 309 2058 1511 3,878

Satisfaction 1-4 27 339 474 840

Happiness 1-5 27 344 482 853 Note. Safety items ranged from 1=Very dissatisfied to 6=Very satisfied,….. Satisfaction items ranged from 1=No, Never to 4=Yes, All of the time Happiness items ranged from 1=Never, 5=Always

analysis

0 What are the specific items howmany survey itemsper scale why does the sample size

vary so much why was LA county the

focus how many schools districts in the

sample

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

34

Hypothesis 1

Hypothesis 1 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American

male youth in Los Angeles County would report a lower level of school safety compared to their

Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to assess

the differences in levels of safety between African Americans, Hispanics/Latinx, and Whites.

Contrary to our hypothesis, Hispanic/Latinx students reported the lowest levels of safety (M =

3.14) in comparison to White (M = 3.32) and African American students (M = 3.17). There was a

significant effect between the three races at the p < .05 level regarding school safety [F(2, 3875)

= 20.211, p = <.001]. Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated mean scores

for African American students (M = 3.17, SD = .871) indicated minute but significant mean

differences between Hispanic/Latinx (M = 3.14, SD = .844) and White students (M = 3.32, SD =

.759).

Table 2

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 1

RACE MEAN SD STD ERROR 95% CI BLACK/AA 3.17 .871 .050 3.07 – 3.27

HISPANIC/LATINX 3.14 .844 .019 3.11 – 3.18 WHITE 3.32 .759 .020 3.28 – 3.35 TOTAL 3.21 .818 .013 3.19 – 3.24

Note. AA=African Americans

SUM OF SQUARES DF MEAN

SQUARE F P-VALUE BETWEEN GROUPS 26.795 2 13.398 20.2 <.001* WITHIN GROUPS 2598.696 3875 .663 TOTAL 2595.491 3877

Note. p >.001

compute effectsize Such a large sample

willmake any slight difference significant

but it may not be clinically significant

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

35

Hypothesis 2

Hypothesis 2 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American

male youth in Los Angeles County will report a lower level of school satisfaction compared to

their Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to

assess the differences in levels of school satisfaction between African Americans,

Hispanic/Latinx, and Whites. Under our hypothesis, Black/African American students reported

the lowest levels of school satisfaction (M = 4.48) in comparison to White (M = 4.65) and

Hispanic/Latinx peers (M = 4.60). Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated

non-significant mean score differences [F(2, 837) = .330, p = .719) between Black/African

Americans (M = 4.48, SD = 1.503), Hispanic/Latinx (M = 4.60, SD = 1.239) and White (M =

4.65, SD = 1.138).

Table 3

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 2

RACE MEAN SD STD ERROR 95% CI BLACK/AA 4.48 1.503 .289 3.89 – 5.08

HISPANIC/LATINX 4.60 1.239 .067 4.47 – 4.74 WHITE 4.65 1.138 .052 4.55 – 4.75 TOTAL 4.63 1.191 .041 4.54 – 4.71

SUM OF SQUARES DF MEAN

SQUARE F P-VALUE BETWEEN GROUPS .939 2 .470 .330 .719 WITHIN GROUPS 1189.936 837 1.422 TOTAL 1190.875 839

Note. AA=African Americans

Hypothesis 3

Hypothesis 3 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American

male youth in Los Angeles County will report lower levels of happiness compared to their

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

36

Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to assess

the differences in levels of unhappiness between African Americans, Hispanic/Latinx, and

Whites. This was reverse-coded, indicating that higher mean values meant lower happiness

levels. Following our hypothesis, Black/African American students reported the lowest levels of

unhappiness (M = 2.07) in comparison to White (M = 1.87) and Hispanic/Latinx peers (M =

1.88). Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated non-significant mean score

differences [F(2, 850) = 1.012, p = .364) between Black/African Americans (M = 2.07, SD =

.917), Hispanic/Latinx (M = 1.88, SD = .859) and White (M = 1.87, SD = .588).

Table 4

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 3

RACE MEAN SD STD ERROR 95% CI BLACK/AA 2.07 .917 .176 1.71 – 2.44

HISPANIC/LATINX 1.88 .859 .046 1.79 – 1.97 WHITE 1.87 .588 .027 1.82 – 1.92 TOTAL 1.88 .720 .025 1.83 – 1.93

Note. AA=African Americans

SUM OF SQUARES DF MEAN

SQUARE F P-VALUE BETWEEN GROUPS 1.051 2 .526 1.01 .364 WITHIN GROUPS 441.226 850 .519 TOTAL 442.277 852

again listing the actualitems wouldbehelpful

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

37

Chapter 5

DISCUSSION

The CHKS study discusses salient findings about the academic experiences of African

American male youth in Los Angeles County, offering a window into the nuanced interplay

between race, educational environment, and student wellbeing. These discussions surface

multifarious implications concerning the school climate and emotional health of African

American students alongside their Hispanic/Latinx and White peers. Furthermore, it discusses

the current educational discourse and the enduring racial disparities that shape these youths'

educational trajectories.

Regarding school safety, the unanticipated report of lower safety levels among

Hispanic/Latinx students deviates from expected outcomes and suggests intricate socio-cultural

dynamics at play. The findings here echo more significant societal conversations about

differential treatment and the impact of socioeconomic status on educational experiences

(Arneback & Jämte, 2022; Trent et al., 2019). Specifically, these disparities resonate with

historical patterns of inequitable resource allocation and institutional approaches that may

perpetuate a sense of insecurity among marginalized communities. This study found no

significant racial differences regarding school satisfaction, paradoxically juxtaposing the reality

that African American students reported the lowest satisfaction levels. This suggests latent

complexities in how satisfaction is articulated and processed across racial lines. The varied

academic outcomes across ethnic groups may arise from differential responses to homogenous

educational practices, spotlighting a critical area for introspection in pedagogic approaches

(Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016).

Learns_

10 theans ThEy

asmall

sample size

which led

to a lack of

power

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

38

Similarly, the CHKS analysis of the happiness levels among African American students

unveiled a non-significant trend toward greater unhappiness. While not stark, this prompts a

critical assessment of factors contributing to their wellbeing, threading into conversations about

racial composition in schools and the impact on students' social and academic realities (Evans-

Winters & Hines, 2020). The study's introduction steers towards educational structures that uplift

critical thinking through racial diversity and fortifying strategies that mitigate vulnerability due

to peer harassment.

The resilience observed in African American students is commendable despite the

formidable barriers such as cultural incongruity, financial constraints, and socio-educational

alienation in predominantly white institutions. This resilience underscores a broader narrative of

resistance and adaptation in the face of systemic educational and socioeconomic impediments,

affirming the complex interplay of risk and resilience in minority education (Hunter-Johnson,

2022). The examination of racial trauma within educational settings further exacerbates the

dialogue on the intricate relation between student experiences and development under the duress

of racialized experiences. Educational arenas are settings for cognitive growth and territories

where racial identities are contested, fortified, or assailed, affecting African American students to

varying degrees concerning their developmental trajectories (Hernández & Harris., 2022).

The historical survey brings forth evidence pointing to entrenched, systemic racial

discrimination, with remnants still palpable in today's educational policies and practices. This

historical overview, notably referencing Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and subsequent landmark

cases, showcases the longevity and stubbornness of racial inequality within educational contexts,

necessitating urgent and systemic interventions. These discussions invite scrutiny of the current

interventions focused on dismantling the persisting barriers sculpted by racial disparities. Policy

are hotcountryschools predominantly

White

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

39

reforms, culturally responsive teaching, and augmented mental health services outlined as

current interventions form an essential solution toward a more equitable education landscape.

They are imperative in ensuring that the echoes of historical exclusions do not reverberate into

the future of African American education.

Limitations

This study had several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the

findings. First, the sample was limited to African American male youth in Los Angeles County

public schools. While focusing on this specific population was intentional, given the study aims,

the geographic restriction reduces generalizability to the broader population of African American

students nationwide. In particular, findings may not reflect the realities of African American

youth in rural areas or other urban centers with different socioeconomic and educational

dynamics. Relatedly, intersectional diversity within African American communities along the

lines of social class, family structure, or sexual identities could result in a range of academic

experiences not fully captured in the data.

Additionally, the quantitative nature of the survey data, while allowing examination of

group trends, does not provide a nuanced, qualitative understanding of how socio-cultural and

institutional processes shape students' schooling realities. Statistical comparisons of school

climate perceptions or wellbeing indicators lack the contextual insights from open-ended

interviews or ethnographic observation. As such, the survey items represent researcher-driven

categories that may not fully align with emic perspectives or address subtle environmental

factors impacting minority youth engagement. Mixed methods incorporating participatory

assessments could strengthen the cultural validity of findings.

Latinxand

why Umabl

goopoint

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

40

The voluntary nature of district participation in administering the CHKS also presents a

self-selection threat where included counties may have more robust student support initiatives. If

less-resourced districts with more significant unmet needs are underrepresented, reported racial

disparities could be muted, distorting the scope of current inequities. Relatedly, social

desirability bias could affect student responses regarding sensitive topics like discrimination or

mental health. Steps to maximize anonymity protections help minimize this bias but do not

eliminate it.

Additionally, the cross-sectional rather than longitudinal design collects data at one point.

Tracking students' trajectories over multiple years could reveal developmental patterns in how

environmental stressors, coping skills, or shifting identities influence academic outcomes,

motivation, and engagement. Capturing such changes may be especially relevant for historically

marginalized youth with evolving awareness of systemic barriers as they progress through

school.

On the other hand, the complex role of intersecting student identities beyond race and

gender could provide essential nuance to the findings. Exploring disparities along socioeconomic

lines using eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch could help disentangle the effects of racial

marginalization from class barriers. Similarly, accounting for special education status, home

language, or immigration generation would allow parsing unique challenges tied to a disability,

cultural adaptation, or documentation that minority students disproportionately face. Ultimately,

this study provided an initial glimpse into equity issues in Los Angeles schools but has

substantial room to expand in scope, depth, and inclusivity moving forward. Pursuing

multifaceted analyses of student experiences can strengthen the knowledge base for targeted,

culturally-attuned interventions promoting success for all youth.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

41

Recommendation

While this study offers valuable insights into the academic experiences of African

American male youth in Los Angeles County, additional research is imperative to inform

supportive policies and practices promoting equitable education. First, incorporating diverse

geographic contexts beyond urban counties would strengthen generalizability and allow for a

comparison of the realities of African American students in rural, suburban, and urban spaces

nationally. Vast differences in school funding, offerings, demographic composition, and cultural

dynamics likely contribute to varied outcomes needing exploration. Additionally, qualitative,

ethnographic, or participatory assessments capturing emic perspectives through student voices

and observations could contextualize quantitative findings on achievement patterns, motivation,

belonging, and wellbeing. Mixed methodology leveraging cultural validity from community-

centered designs would enhance the research rigor and applied impact.

Relatedly, enhanced engagement with intersectional frameworks around class, family

structure, sexual orientation, citizenship status and disability could unveil compounded

marginalization for African American youth holding multiple minoritized identities.

Quantitatively disaggregating academic performance, retention, and climate perceptions based

on income, documentation status, LGBTQ identity, ability, and other constructs would clarify

varied needs. A qualitative exploration of navigating overlapping systemic barriers across social

institutions could also further practical support. Additionally, longitudinal tracking from early

schooling through college and career entry would provide invaluable data on how environmental

stressors, discrimination, and protective factors influence youth development and outcomes over

time. Awareness of status and opportunity gaps often evolves developmentally, shaping

academic trajectories. Capturing such processes could direct age-appropriate interventions.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

42

Critically, the sampling frame should expand to diverse counties nationwide for broader

claims and comparisons. Drawing participants proportionately across income levels would help

separate racialized effects from socioeconomic obstacles. Overrepresenting struggling districts

and underserved communities could better target unmet needs. Enhanced cultural validity

procedures like member-checking preliminary themes, collaborating on survey design, or

participatory analysis would also uplift community knowledge. Funding community researchers

as equitable partners rather than passive subjects can enhance relevance and reciprocity. From a

policy standpoint, school districts must move beyond simplistic diversity commitments toward

actionable work addressing systemic racism through curriculum, tracking, admissions, funding,

and cultural competency training. Academic studies can guide these efforts with context-specific

evidence.

Additionally, further research should emphasize school-level strategies to support

marginalized students through professional development, expanding teachers' cultural awareness

and responsiveness. Evaluating implicit bias training, restorative justice programs, or racial

socialization curricula across classroom settings and districts would clarify best practices for

national scaling. To that end, stronger partnerships between education scholars, school

administrations, and communities of color must inform the research. For example, community

advisory boards reviewing proposed projects could strengthen sensibility to lived experiences

and priority needs. Ultimately, nuanced, mixed-method examinations of intersecting student

identities across diverse locales can illuminate pathways toward equitable education, where

strengths-based, culturally validating pedagogies empower all youth. The journey beyond

documented disparities toward lasting justice requires community representation and

participation at all stages, from conceptualization through application.

citations

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

43

Conclusion

This study corroborates the need for a grand, inter-sectional strategy to challenge the

status quo of educational inequity. It ascertains that awareness of differential treatment,

socioeconomic disparities, and systematic racial traumas must enlighten the design of academic

reforms, policy restructuring, and practice within schools. Moving forward requires an

indomitable pursuit of diversity, inclusivity, and support systems that transcend mere rhetoric,

cultivating a fertile ground for all students, especially those historically disenfranchised, to

thrive. The trajectory from recognizing disparities to realizing true educational equality

necessitates concerted efforts across all societal structures, thus embracing these critical

examinations as beacons for illumination in the onward journey.

Ultimately, the findings reveal more work is needed to disentangle the multifaceted

factors influencing African American students' wellbeing, engagement, and success in schools

often not designed for their socio-cultural thriving. The discussion situates these patterns within

broader conversations on enduring educational inequities along racial lines stemming from

biased curricula, discriminatory tracking policies, and cultural contradictions between minority

youth identities and white-normed institutions. These historical realities underscore the need for

continued research and policy efforts promoting systemic change for justice. The study's

limitations centered on generalizability, researcher biases, social desirability effects, self-

selection, and variable centering that future work should address through inclusive mixed

methodology.

Key recommendations include enhanced engagement with intersectionality, qualitative

illumination of lived experiences, community-driven participatory research practices, nationwide

sampling reaching diverse locales, and longitudinal tracking of within-group heterogeneity

1 saught

now

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

44

across developmental stages. Additionally, scaling targeted professional development

opportunities for teachers and school leaders related to cultural competence, restorative justice

programs, and antiracist education could spark impactful transformation. Ultimately, realizing

the vision for racially equitable schooling free from systemic oppression requires bringing

affected communities to the forefront as authorities over their own experiences and advocates for

responsive redress. Academics must move from observing inequities to enacting change through

reciprocal collaboration. This study provided a reminder of persistent racial injustices in Los

Angeles County schools that should reignite advocacy efforts, policy revisions, and critical

consciousness-raising to empower minority youth futures. The collective work ahead

necessitates relentless critique of neutrality myths, intersectional solidarity, and platforming of

scholarship and stories exposing realities of marginalization.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

45

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. E., McKenny, M. C., & Stevenson, H. C. (2019). EMBR ace: Developing a racial

socialization intervention to reduce racial stress and enhance racial coping among Black

parents and adolescents. Family Process, 58(1), 53-67.

Al Shamsi, H., Almutairi, A. G., Al Mashrafi, S., & Al Kalbani, T. (2020). Implications of

language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman medical journal, 35(2), e122.

Arneback, E., & Jämte, J. (2022). How to counteract racism in education–A typology of teachers'

antiracist actions. Race ethnicity and education, 25(2), 192-211.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In Six theories of child development:

Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Colen, C. G., Ramey, D. M., Cooksey, E. C., & Williams, D. R. (2018). Racial disparities in

health among nonpoor African Americans and Hispanics: The role of acute and chronic

discrimination. Social Science & Medicine, 199, 167–180.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.051

Connell, J. P., & Spencer, M. B. (n.d.). Educational Risk and Resilience in African American

Youth: Context, Self, Action, and Outcomes in School. 16.

Daniller, A. (n.d.). Majorities of Americans see at least some discrimination against Black,

Hispanic and Asian people in the U.S. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 4, 2022,

from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/18/majorities-of-americans-see-at-

least-some-discrimination-against-black-hispanic-and-asian-people-in-the-u-s/

Dickerson, S. S., Gruenewald, T. L., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). When the social self is threatened:

Shame, physiology, and health. Journal of personality, 72(6), 1191-1216.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

46

Editors, H. com. (n.d.). Brown v. Board of Education. HISTORY. Retrieved August 5, 2022,

from https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/brown-v-board-of-education-of-topeka

Evans-Winters, V. E., & Hines, D. E. (2020). Unmasking white fragility: How whiteness and white

student resistance impacts antiracist education. Whiteness and Education, 5(1), 1-16.

Family Contributions to Risk and Resilience in African-American Children—ProQuest. (n.d.).

Retrieved September 9, 2022, from

https://www.proquest.com/openview/9d8e74df7fc34ce553844a96d295c14c/1.pdf?pq-

origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816533&casa_token=PXhJbabro_kAAAAA:-

Vo1kZurgvMUzZ_1mUXZQzGK_GZv6XndyQ0vEur9fGpBFWaIQdpaRalvjC0b1G0mYFj

3vwI

Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy:

Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality. TRANSMODERNITY:

Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1).

https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004

Hatchimonji, D. R., Branch, K., Perry, D., & Barnes, T. N. (2022). Actions Against Racism:

Bringing Together Trauma-Informed Practices, Social-Emotional Learning, and Racial

Socialization to Combat Racism in Schools. Delaware Journal of Public Health, 8(2), 40.

Henderson, D. X., Walker, L., Barnes, R. R., Lunsford, A., Edwards, C., & Clark, C. (2019). A

framework for race‐related trauma in the public education system and implications on

health for black youth. Journal of School Health, 89(11), 926-933.

Hernández, E., & Harris, D. M. (2022). Racial trauma: Implications for student development. New

Directions for Student Services, 2022(177), 95-103.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

47

Hunter-Johnson, Y. (2022). A leap of academic faith and resilience: Nontraditional international

students pursuing higher education in the United States of America. Journal of

International Students, 12(2).

Krsmanovic, M. (2022). Encountering American higher education: First-year academic transition

of international undergraduate students in the United States. Journal of Global Education

and Research, 6(2), 148-165.

Lopez, A. E. (2020). Anti-Black racism in education: School leaders' journey of resistance and

hope. Handbook on promoting social justice in education, 1935-1950.

Mosley, D. V., Hargons, C. N., Meiller, C., Angyal, B., Wheeler, P., Davis, C., & Stevens-

Watkins, D. (2021). Critical consciousness of anti-Black racism: A practical model to

prevent and resist racial trauma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(1), 1–

16. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000430

O'Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork,

V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally

responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM education, 7, 1-15.

Ottwein, J. K. (2020). Working toward equitable gifted programming: The school psychologist's

role. Psychology in the Schools, 57(6), 937-945.

Penner, L. A., Hagiwara, N., Eggly, S., Gaertner, S. L., Albrecht, T. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2013).

Racial healthcare disparities: A social psychological analysis. European review of social

psychology, 24(1), 70-122.

Persky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Jin, Y. (2003). The Nation's Report Card: Writing, 2002.

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

48

Ponti, C. (n.d.). America's History of Slavery Began Long Before Jamestown. HISTORY.

Retrieved August 4, 2022, from https://www.history.com/news/american-slavery-before-

jamestown-1619

Quintana, S. M., & Mahgoub, L. (2016). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology's

role in understanding and reducing disparities. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 94-103.

Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A., & Allen, D. N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological

assessment. In Mastering Modern Psychological Testing: Theory and Methods (pp. 573-

613). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Sasso, P. A., & Davis, K. (2022). Jewish Fraternities and Sororities as Spaces of Resistance

Against Antisemitism. Georgia Journal of College Student Affairs, 38(1), 59-81.

Spencer, L. A. M. (2016). Exploring the transition experiences of successful international

undergraduate students at a public research university in the USA: The impact on

international student success and retention (Doctoral dissertation, University of South

Florida).

The Californial School Climate, Health, and Learning Survey (CalSCHLS) System - FAQs.

(n.d.). Calschls.org. Retrieved October 30, 2023, from https://calschls.org/resources/faqs/

Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: using what we

already know to take action. International journal of environmental research and public

health, 16(4), 606.

Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health:

Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 20–47.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0

addappendien letter granting permission

to access the dater IRB approval letter

etc