Need corrections made, one more time on my thesis

In 2015 and 2016, the overall life expectancy for the United States (US) population experienced a slight decline from 76.3 years to 76.1 years (Khazan, 2017). This decrease was primarily attributed to a notable increase in the mortality rate among African American males. Furthermore, research has shown that high social stress levels can lead to elevated stress hormones, such as proinflammatory cytokine activity and cortisol levels (Dickerson, Gruenewald & Kemeny, 2004). This chronic stress has been linked to a lack of social support and an increased prevalence of psychological problems over time (Schmeelk-Cone & Zimmerman, 2003). However, despite these concerning statistics, existing literature has not adequately explored the relationship between school safety, school satisfaction and levels of happiness experienced by African American male youth in educational setting in comparison to their Hispanic and Caucasian counterparts. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing data from the California Healthy Kids Study (CHKS) and adopting historical and ecological perspectives to examine these complex factors. The outcomes of this study will not only offer insights into strategies for promoting improved academic outcomes among African American male youth and contribute to efforts to rectify racial health disparities between this demographic and the majority population.

Keywords: racism, discrimination, resilience, African-American, males

I would like to begin by expressing my gratitude to God, whose strength sustained me throughout this journey, enabling me to complete this thesis. I extend heartfelt thanks to my parents, Paul and Nwanneka Ifediba, for their unwavering support and inspiration. To my siblings, Ifeanyi, Izuchukwu, and Ifunanya, your encouragement fuels my dedication to education. I am deeply grateful to my extended family in Nimo, Nigeria, and the communities of St. Eugene Catholic Church, Igbo Catholic Community USA, and Umu Igbo Unite for their steadfast support. Special thanks to the Department of Advanced Studies in Education and Counseling at California State University, Long Beach, for their resources and guidance. I owe a debt of gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Dr. Kerri-Knight Teague, for her invaluable expertise and feedback. Likewise, to my thesis committee members, Dr. Edwin Achola and Dr. Kirsten Powers. I also acknowledge the California Department of Education and California Healthy Kids Survey, particularly, Ben Trigg for granting me access to essential student data. Furthermore to Dr. Erin Arruda for her assistance with analysis and coding of this work. the Lastly, I appreciate Dr. Carolyn Murray and her lab for inspiring this topic and my time at UC Riverside's USA STEM Academy. May the findings of this thesis contribute to advancing equitable education and amplifying the voices of marginalized youth in Los Angeles schools and beyond.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………………………………..iii LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………………….v INTRODUCTION…………...………………………………………………………………... 1 LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………………………... 11 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………... 28 RESULTS …………………………………………………………………………………………….33 DISCUSSION …………………………………….………………………………………………….37 REFERENCES……………………………………..…………………………………………... 45

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Descriptives………………...………………………………………………….. 33 Table 2 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 1…………...…34 Table 3 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 2……………...35 Table 4 Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 3……………...36

Running Head: EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN BOYS

3

CHAPTER 1

When interacting with another person, one expects fairness and equality throughout the discussion. This can be described as a "normal" discussion, and the principle of the Golden Rule, or treating others how you would like to be treated, should be applied. Yet, this is not always the case. Moments of discrimination or unfair treatment may occur to an individual when it is least expected. Additionally, these moments occur more to minorities than previously thought. African Americans frequently report higher levels of discrimination than their peers (Pew Research Center, 2021). Furthermore, these instances of discriminatory treatment have led to worse health outcomes (Paradies, 2006). Levels of everyday discrimination are associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates than acute instances (Williams & Mohammed, 2009).

However, linking discrimination as the cause of these detrimental health concerns for African Americans does little to understand the historical context of African American communities and the years of oppressive historical occurrences in their rich history. Historians debate the beginning of slavery; however, Grosfoguel, (2011) reports that the first enslaved people being dropped off in late August 1619 appears to be the story widely accepted, despite reports of Africans being present in the American societies prior due to exploratory endeavors by Christopher Columbus in the 1400s. Regardless, this marked the inception of a multi-billion-dollar slave trade along with racism and discriminatory treatment that would last for generations (Colen et al., 2018).

As enslaved people continued to be brought to the United States, the cotton industry soon began to develop to exploit enslaved people to their full potential. Slaves were also cruelly beaten, lynched, and murdered if they tended to disobey or betray their masters. As a result, the Civil War and Emancipation Proclamation were pillars in African American and United States history that showed the United States' various views on slavery. The liberal North and the oppressive South fought dearly for the right to the possession of enslaved people. Their importance cannot be undermined due to their prevalence and strength in the United States economy.

As the country recovered from its pre-Civil War era, a new wave of issues would begin to rot and swallow the country in the upcoming 20th century. One of the most significant rulings during this era was Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. This landmark ruling stated that racial segregation of children in schools was unconstitutional. This cornerstone ruling allowed for equal education (Ponti, 2022). The motivation was that African American students received inadequate education compared to their white counterparts. School segregation, bathrooms, public restaurants, and public transportation further exacerbate these ideas. Nevertheless, in 1957, the "Little Rock Nine'' became the pillar of resilience in the African American community. By blazing the trail and attending an integrated school with thousands of white onlookers screaming profanity and slurs, they began a new generation of race dynamics in the United States and its education system.

Despite the strides taken in the course of over 400 years of African American history, the remnants of slavery and racism remain and affect many African Americans to this day. Steele (2003) reports that throughout the 1990s, the national college dropout rate for African Americans continued to be 20 to 25 percent higher than for whites. Additionally, nearly all aspects of underperformance, from graduation rates to college grades, continue to persist among African Americans to this day. Issues such as lower academic performance, higher crime rates, and higher rates of suspension continue to destroy the African American community. Despite these adversities, African Americans remain resilient to these changes and find ways to overcome their obstacles. Even in today's vastly expanding world, African Americans' resilience should be revered and respected despite the many risks they encounter.

Statement of the Problem

In 2015 and 2016, the overall life expectancy for the United States (US) population decreased from 76.3 to 76.1 years (Khazan, 2017). This drop was attributed to an increase in the death rate for African American males. Furthermore, previous literature demonstrates that high threats to one's social wellbeing increase stress hormones such as proinflammatory cytokine activity and cortisol levels (Dickerson, Gruenewald & Kemeny, 2004). This stress over time has been shown to coincide with a lack of support and more psychological problems (Schmeelk-Cone & Zimmerman, 2003). Despite these statistics, there is a lack of research examining the relationship between school satisfaction, school safety, and levels of happiness among school-age African American youth. My thesis intends to examine these factors using historical and ecological perspectives. The findings of this study will identify interventions to promote healthier academic outcomes for African American youth. Additionally, it will assist in addressing racial health discrepancies between African American youth and other majority populations.

Purpose of Study

This study aims to address the hindrances that African American boys face both economically and environmentally in their pursuit to promote healthier academic outcomes for African American youth. Furthermore, it will shed light on the many accomplishments the African American community has achieved despite inadequate circumstances. Routinely, African Americans are undermined and disproportionately singled out despite their many contributions to American society. However, societal circumstances have routinely pushed African Americans to the brink of resolve numerous times, yet we have been able to withstand them. Finally, this study examines disparities in the educational system between African American and Caucasian students.

Importance of Study/Significance

Discrimination and stigma are complex and can affect health in numerous ways. One way is through day-to-day encounters with microaggressions, racial slurs, and other subtle actions that elicit fear and tension. Another way is through more extensive and more severe acts of racism, such as being fired from a job, random racial profiling, and unfair treatment in the healthcare system (Murray, 2016). Lastly, being profiled and harassed by individuals leads to continuous anxiety and worry, contributing to anticipatory behavior that affects individual habits (Murray, 2016). Researchers have given these concepts various names: Daily Discrimination refers to more minor everyday discriminatory incidents (e.g., microaggressions), Major Discrimination (e.g., police harassment) refers to more substantial lifetime discriminatory episodes, Anticipated Discrimination refers to the fear of further discriminatory treatment to come (Dickerson, Gruenewald & Kemeny, 2004). Previous literature has not compared the impact of various types of discrimination on self-reported general health to determine how the various types of discrimination overlap and how they are distinct. This thesis primarily focuses on academic experiences using data from the California Healthy Kids Survey, it is essential to acknowledge the broader health implications of discrimination against African American youth. Prior research, such as the Child Health and Development Disparities study, has investigated how discrimination affects health. These effects can manifest physiologically and emotionally through poor healthcare quality and promoting unhealthy behaviors. Different types of discrimination are commonly reported by African American youth including significant, daily, and anticipated discrimination, however it is important to consider how perceptions of health and well being compare across different race and ethnic identities. Though not the primary focus of this thesis, understanding the multifaceted impact of discrimination on health provides an essential context for examining the academic experiences of African American youth within the educational system.

Discrimination and Health

Discrimination is a social stressor seen as an unfair or unjustified socially structured action (Abramson et al., 2015). This stressor increases cortisol levels and causes a fight-or-flight response. Dickerson, Gruenewald, and Kemeny (2004) argue that high threats to one's social wellbeing increase stress hormones such as proinflammatory cytokine activity and cortisol levels. Continual reception of these threats reduces one's overall level of general health. However, physiological effects are not the only way that this can occur. Discrimination can also affect individuals in that they receive inadequate healthcare. Furthermore, it can affect individuals directly and indirectly by promoting unhealthy behaviors such as poor diet, smoking, and avoidance of healthcare (Carlisle & Murray, in press).

Physiological and Emotional Effects of Discrimination

Discrimination and health have been intertwined strongly over the centuries through unfair treatment, racial tensions, and inequality. Previous literature has offered strong evidence that racial discrimination produces stress, which has direct physiological effects on health. This includes emotional effects and direct physical stress. For example, one study found that racism and discriminatory treatment accelerated aging at a biological level, consequently linking racism and disease risk (Chae et al., 2014). Another study linked discrimination to heightened blood pressure, which can decrease wellbeing among African Americans (Deitch et al., 2003). Discrimination can also induce negative emotions, loneliness, and lower overall life satisfaction (Sutin et al., 2015). These emotions can affect an individual's life from young adulthood to old age and their health and wellbeing. Discrimination's emotional impact also carries over by promoting instances of depressive symptoms, major depression, and psychological distress in an individual (Hwang & Goto, 2008). Perception of discriminatory events also plays a role in health. An analysis of 134 samples of perceived discrimination studies found a significant adverse effect on both the mental and physical health of individuals; perceived discriminatory events were linked with hypertension, self-reported general health, and breast cancer (Pascoe & Richman, 2009).

Theoretical Framework(s)

A child's development requires the efforts of parents, teachers, relatives, and others. From an ecological lens, psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory of human development sets the foundation for ecological systems theory. He coined the idea of systems such as the microsystem to the macrosystem (Harkonen, 2001). As a result, these systems have created a path for the scholarly development of a child and emphasized the importance of parental involvement as the stepping stone of this ecological theory.

Despite parents being the root of a child's success, the level of involvement of parents matters in the rearing of the child. For example, if a parent can assist a child with homework, positive feelings about learning occur within the child and the teacher in the classroom (Epstein & Dauber, 1991). These positive experiences are excellent for everyone within the microsystem, yet the problem is that these positive experiences are not consistent across all students. Peters and colleagues (2007) conducted a thorough survey using responses from over 5,032 parents regarding their involvement in their child's academics. Their survey found that only "around half (51%) of parents felt very involved in their child's school life: and that lone parents and non-resident parents were both less likely than average to feel very involved." This gap is further emphasized by "one in three parents (32%) saying they help their children with their homework every time, while a further 26% do so most times" and lastly, "around one in three parents (35%) had helped out in class or at school at some point". These alarming statistics highlight the differences in treatment that every child faces.

The dichotomy behind education and parental involvement are two aspects of education that both offer an exciting outlook on the factors that affect a child's growth. Despite the resources being available in schools, a child's success is also grounded in the willingness of a parent to be available during their child's learning experience. Nevertheless, their availability can vary depending on their job, current lifestyle, and moral willingness to engage with their child. This engagement can be through homework assistance, involvement in school programs, and the listening skills of the parent (Wilder, 2014). Wilder (2014) also suggests that involvement in back-to-school nights and sporting events helps to build rapport with the student and school community. These activities help to nurture the microsystem arrangement and foster an organic relationship between family, school, and the student.

Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory also relies not only on the microsystem but also the mesosystem, exosystem (extended family and neighbors), macrosystem (attitudes and ideologies of the culture), and chronosystem (environmental changes that occur over time (Härkönen, 2001). As a result, the school system exists within the exosystem and macrosystem due to its relationship with local policies, social services and the attitudes surrounding it. The school system also works intimately with macrosystems such as socioeconomic status (SES), which also play an intimate role with parents in the school system.

Definitions/Terminology

Racism: Racism is a global hierarchy of superiority and inferiority along the line of the human that has been politically, culturally, and economically produced and reproduced for centuries by the institutions of the "capitalist/patriarchal western-centric/Christian-centric modern/colonial world system" (Grosfoguel, 2011)

Discrimination: consists of actions, practices, or policies that are—in some appropriate sense—based on the (perceived) social group to which those discriminated against belong and that the relevant groups must be socially salient in that they structure interaction in meaningful social contexts (Lippert-Rasmussen, 2006)

Resilience: ​​Shahroozi (2021) defines resilience as "positive outcomes, adaptation or attainment of developmental milestones or competencies in the face of significant risk, adversity or stress." It underscores the importance of understanding how African American youths navigate challenges and develop strategies to thrive in educational settings, highlighting the need for interventions that support their holistic development and safety within the school environment

Ecological Systems Theory: Urie Bronfenbrenner formulated the Ecological Systems Theory to explain how social environments affect children's development. This theory emphasizes the importance of studying children in multiple environments, known as ecological systems, to understand their development.

Research Questions

1) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report a lower level of school safety compared to their Hispanic and White counterparts?

2) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report lower school satisfaction than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

3) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report lower happiness than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

Conclusion

Given the context of disparities in education and health among African Americans, there must be a greater understanding of discriminatory treatment and its effects on health and education. By examining African American youth in schools and their environmental risks, this study hopes to understand better how people understand racial events toward African American communities and beyond.

CHAPTER 2

In this chapter, the literature review explores previous research contextualizing the experiences of African American students in the education system. It examines issues around racial discrimination in schools, including inequalities stemming from differential treatment, biases tied to socioeconomic status, language barriers, and discrepancies in academic outcomes. The discussion then turns to arguments for embracing diverse school environments to nourish critical thinking, access professional connections, and mitigate student vulnerabilities. Additionally, this chapter discusses risk and resilience patterns among African American learners pursuing academics, highlighting formidable obstacles faced but noting substantial persistence despite challenges. Similarly, it delves into prevalent issues surrounding racial trauma in education contexts and strategies to provide affected students with coping outlets and counter discriminatory practices. Collectively, the review situates the current study within broader conversations on persisting inequities and complex dynamics influencing African American student success.

Racism and Education

According to Arneback & Jämte (2022), education attainment is the critical developmental outcome widely assessing successful growth and development. They stated that racism is often seen as a historical/and or individual-oriented problem in schools. However, discrepancies have been seen through equalities presented to them through inequalities due to differential treatment, differences in socioeconomic practice and educational outcomes and more.

Inequalities Due to Differential Treatment and Socioeconomic Status

Racial differences in academic accomplishment represent egregious and apparent racial and ethnic disparities. Racial discrimination in the education system takes different forms and sometimes goes unnoticed. However, victims of persisting discrimination may portray hostility that they express in implicit and explicit forms, which society perceives as microaggressions that stigmatize these minority groups. They do not receive the help they need on time, widening disparities in the education sector. A study by Quintana & Mahgoub. (2016) found that racial discrimination was executed by teachers who treated students' education abilities differently depending on their racial and ethnic backgrounds throughout the academic year. Likewise, Trent et al. (2019) found that educational disparities in the United States are portrayed by the poor quality of schooling, where children from poor socioeconomic backgrounds are marginalized, contributing to uneven opportunities to access education. The authors also find that occupational and economic abilities aggravate substantial differences in academic performance.

Inequalities Contributed by Differences in Response to Educational PracticeTop of Form

Bottom of Form

Racial differences in the education system manifest as differences in response to education practices based on racial and ethnic status. This means students from different racial backgrounds perform based on their ability to respond to similar educational situations. This can go unnoticed, although it is integral to understanding why disparities persist (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). By drawing from health disparities, they explain that the reason why health disparities persist is that people from different racial or ethnic backgrounds receive the same type of healthcare but respond differently to it. Educational practices or approaches might be the same for all students but lead to different outcomes for students from various ethnic and racial backgrounds. The definition of educational disparities used by the Task Force encompasses situations where educational outcomes differ among ethnic and racial minority children due to variations in how they interact with the educational system. In other words, it's not just about what happens in schools but also how students from different backgrounds respond to what happens in schools, which can contribute to the disparities in educational achievement.

Inequalities in Educational Outcomes

Although American institutions have been implementing substantial efforts to resolve this national crisis for the last six decades, the Nation's Report Card (2003) data disclose that academic educational disparities continue to exist and have snowballed widely in the last decades. The authors find that some groups, like African American, Latino, Native American, and some Asian American students, tend to do worse in school from when they start in preschool until they finish high school. They are also less likely to graduate from high school, get into special programs for talented students, or go to college compared to White and some other Asian American students. For example, Latino students are almost four times more likely to drop out of school compared to White students, and African American students are three times more likely to be suspended or expelled. Many of these minority students still graduate from high school at a rate just above 60%, and in some big city schools where most students are low-income and minorities, the graduation rates are even lower than 50%. Among the same racial groups, boys tend to do worse in school than girls and multiracial young people say they face more physical threats in school than others (Persky, Daane & Jin, 2003)

Reasons For Embracing Racially Diverse School Environment

Racial composition is essential in the education system as it explains how embracing diversity in the learning environment can influence other aspects of students' social experience and academic accomplishment. Findings by Arneback & Jämte (2022) disclose that schools embracing racial and ethnic differences stimulate the development of critical thinking skills among students as it allows students to discuss social issues affecting them, with each student offering an opinion based on where they come from. Therefore, exposure to different opinions in a class environment strengthens students' ability to think critically about complex issues facing their community. Additionally, attending racially diverse schools strengthens students' access to professional and social networks, especially when transitioning to postsecondary education. A racially diverse school environment provides students, especially those from marginalized ethnic backgrounds, ample opportunities to develop professional and social connections that are important for their future careers (Evans-Winters & Hines, 2020).

Racially diverse schools inherently reduce students' feelings of vulnerability, irrespective of specific staff actions. In their study, Lopez (2020) researched the impacts of peer harassment at school. When students perceive themselves as vulnerable and feel unsafe due to peer harassment, their emotional and cognitive resources are often compromised, making it difficult for them to perform well academically. In racially diverse schools, where power is distributed across multiple ethnic groups without a single numerical majority, students may feel less vulnerable. This balancing highlights the positive impact of being part of a community with balanced power dynamics, reducing isolation and vulnerability to peer harassment. Such an environment can significantly enhance overall wellbeing and academic performance for students. Overall, the racial composition of schools can influence critical thinking abilities, enhance access to social and professional networks, and reduce feelings of vulnerability among students, highlighting the importance of diversity in educational environments. Schools should prioritize fostering open communication to connect with learners to create a space where they will feel valued. It is also essential to tailor educational programs to provide room for multifaceted discussion to help students share diverse opinions and insights to benefit them in the long run.

Risk and Resilience

African American students are vulnerable to various challenges, including adapting to new cultures, social isolation, unfamiliarity with the curriculum, and financial challenges obstructing their ability to continue pursuing education opportunities (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). Regardless, Lopez (2020) argues that most students have shown substantial resilience to overcome these challenges and graduate from higher education.

Challenges Facing African American Students Pursuing Education in White-Dominated SchoolsTop of Form

Bottom of Form

Non-white students, especially African Americans, experience a wide variety of challenges that white students do not encounter. These challenges include adapting to new cultures, unfamiliarity with the education system, and social isolation from the existing stereotypes (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). While some scholars focus on exploring challenges experienced by students from a social perspective, others approach the issue by exploring language issues, differences in instructional culture and classroom setting, and mostly skin color awareness. Other challenges include confusion and disconnection subjected to them at different social value systems, loss of social status and power, and identity issues contributed by their being classified as a minority, which makes them target victims of the associated stigma, which further hinders their employability (O'Leary et al., 2020).

According to Hunter-Johnson (2022), African American students are expected to blend into learning environments characterized by a generational gap between them and American natives. This can increase feelings of differences as they have different cultural exposure from their fellow students born and raised in white cultures. Prevalence of such differences may even lead to the perception that others view them as inferior, adding to their emotional burden. Moreover, when transitioning to international nontraditional adult learners, it is essential to note that they often require assistance with financial challenges due to the high costs of studying abroad. These financial burdens can impact their social and emotional wellbeing, potentially hindering their academic progress. It is crucial to address these financial pressures to support these learners in completing their academic programs. The outcome of these challenges is increased stress, which persists throughout their academic journey, and many experience challenges qualifying for exams and securing sustainable networking and mentorship opportunities. Once they complete their higher education, they still must face the challenges of seeking employment and job security.

Persistence Of Non-American Students Pursuing Education In the United States

Despite various obstacles, most African American students demonstrate resilience by attaining advanced academic credentials and managing a healthy work-life equilibrium. The findings of Krsmanovic's (2022) study indicate that there are various factors behind nontraditional international students choosing American-centered educational institutions. They include opportunities to improve English, financial support, academic and professional growth drive, interaction in different intercultural settings, future job prospects, better living, politics and economically stable life. The motivations behind the actions of these individuals create a solid base that allows international students to be ambitious and strive hard to do well in academics. One should bear in mind the fact that the motivational patterns among African American learners differ from those of their local counterparts, stemming from significant variations in their life experience (including personal and professional ones) and various factors that determine the living standards, taking into account countries of origin (Spencer, 2016). Spencer (2016) points out that African American students encounter significant challenges in American-oriented institutions, unlike many other groups pursuing education in Western-oriented settings. Despite the challenges, they have shown remarkable resilience, supported by their desire to overcome obstacles in life, strive for academic success, and contribute positively to their communities and society. African American students rely on goals such as enhanced English-language skills, a desire for academic and professional development, exposure to diverse intercultural contexts, prospects for future career advancement, and the promise of improved social status to remain resilient to challenges facing them daily while pursuing education in America (Penner et al., 2013).

Racial Trauma

The negative impacts of racism are well documented, including experiences of racial trauma. Therefore, there is a need to implement interventions to help spread awareness and practical strategies to prevent African American racism, given its harmful impacts.

In recent decades, the rate of racial trauma has tremendously increased in higher learning institutions. The current form of racism has changed from overt acts to subtler, complex racist, and ambiguous incidents at institutional and cultural levels. The events intensify the physiological, emotional, and psychological response when various public humiliations are involved. This leads to students who are targets of overt, public racism on campus feeling frustrated and detached and starting to develop doubts concerning their academic capabilities and challenges with their identity development (Mosley, 2022). The kind of relationship between the student and the perpetrator of racism may have a crucial role in how trauma is ultimately experienced. For example, Mosley (2022) argues that if the perpetrator of racism is a teacher, the power dynamics and authority in the student-teacher relationship can significantly impact how the student experiences and processes the trauma. This builds upon Shalka's work on trauma, which aims to integrate racial trauma into student development theory, recognizing the profound and debilitating effects of racism on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC).

Self-authorship refers to the ability of individuals to define their own identity, beliefs, and social relations, transitioning from reliance on external authorities to internal capacity. Through self-authorship, it is possible to explore how individuals evolve in their ability to define their identity, beliefs, and social relations, transitioning from reliance on external authorities to internal capacity. This approach divides this aspect into three dimensions. It helps individuals to reevaluate who they are, how they see themselves in a racialized manner, and their sense of belonging in society (Henderson et al., 2022). Individuals may be prompted to discard stereotypes and create their sense of self through racial trauma. The second dimension is the cognitive/epistemological dimension, where racial trauma affects students' understanding of how they perceive the world and make the meaning of their social environment. Engaging in traumatic occasions can lead to the realization that their perspectives differ from others, which may entail extra developmental tasks due to the exceptional interpersonal challenges of trauma. The students may grapple with safety, vulnerability, and agency questions in disclosing their post-trauma selves.

The third dimension is interpersonal, which plays a crucial role in exploring how the individuals affected by racial trauma may reconsider their association with others. Racial trauma can lead to self-isolation, isolation, and push-and-pull behavior in interpersonal relations. Students can seek comfort and deep understanding through kinship connections with others who have undergone similar trauma. This sense inspires individuals to serve their community as advocates and mentors, paying forward the support they received and embodying their racial or ethnic identity.

Strategies To Diminish Racial Trauma

Racial trauma can be diminished using various strategies, such as racial socialization, often studied in the context of parents educating their children about race, culture, and identity. It helps children be aware and take necessary precautions to deal with racism. Racial socialization supports coping responses such as teaching children how to respond to racial discrimination, providing them with strategies to navigate challenging situations, and fostering a strong sense of racial identity and pride. In contrast to families and parents of color, white educators and parents are most likely to involve themselves in racial socialization practices that enhance the disruption of racism (Hatchimonji et al., 2022). Therefore, any learning institution aiming to combat racism must build racial socialization skills in all white members of the institution. This will help the school to increase constructive interracial interactions and promote productive racial socialization within the school compound.

On the other hand, trauma-informed strategies assist teachers and adults in identifying students who may be undergoing challenging ways with kindness and give them another chance at healing besides being designed to deal with racism or the stress and trauma related to race. Schools have created trauma-informed programs over the last twenty years to help children cope with trauma, anxiety, and challenging experiences that can harm their development. According to Henderson et al. (2019), these strategies focus on strengthening the existing support and helping students build skills to handle the current trauma. Nevertheless, these methods can sometimes label Brown and Black students as having challenges because of the unfair conditions created by racism. The strengths of trauma-informed approaches should be used to help students adapt to and heal from the trauma and stress related to racism, all while aiming to stop the racism and unfair conditions it creates.

Racial trauma in the education sector plays an integral role in hindering African American individuals from receiving the quality education they desire. However, implementing efforts such as racial trauma and trauma-informed strategies will enable all stakeholders, including teachers and students, to identify victims of racial discrimination and provide them with an environment to cope effectively.

Environmental and Historical Impediments

Racial discrimination against African American students has been a systemic issue historically. These practices persist due to continued reliance on policies that do little to address racial disparities existing in American schools. Environmental and historical obstacles hindering the American education system from embracing an education system free from racial discrimination targeting African American students will be discussed.

Evidence from the United States Census Bureau pinpointed that racial minorities were projected to be 57% of the American population as of 2020 (Mills, 2020). Regardless, fewer students enrolled in higher learning institutions after federal educational policies prohibited individuals from racial minority groups from attaining higher education. Although efforts to diversify academic attendance have been made, they completely erase the history of racial discrimination against African American students, as discriminatory admission policies exist and unfairly exclude students. The persistence of this culture of exclusion creates an unwelcoming climate for these students, increasing attrition and disengagement.

Since the colonial period, federal educational policies prevented African Americans from accessing high-quality education. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) supported the appropriateness of racial segregation in public institutions, stating that it did not violate the American Constitution only if they focused on providing students with equal quality education. However, maintaining equality in education is not easy when the entire system is corrupted by systemic exclusion and racism of minor groups. For instance, Southern Black schools during the 1950s would only receive 60% of the per-student funds from Southern white schools, meaning that black students would go on for months without proper access to primary needs and facilities such as electricity, water, libraries, gymnasiums, and cafeterias (Evans-Winters, & Hines, 2020). The presence of these amenities meant that black students would only access substandard education. However, the civil rights activists and the NAACP during the 1950s did their best to challenge these racial segregation laws in public schools. In 1954, "the separate but equal" principle was overruled by the Brown v. Board of Education. According to the Supreme Court, laws allowing racial segregation in public learning institutions were unconstitutional.

For centuries, American African students were forced to enroll primarily in white boarding schools where they were not allowed to speak their first language or engage in cultural activities. This forced assimilation contributed to the systemic dilution of students' traditions and culture. In addition, the students were banned from participating in college life, primarily in white institutions, which empowered students to form organizations focusing on celebrating the experiences of African American students. These formations allowed students to socialize, assemble, and seek solutions to overcome the harsh repercussions of enrolling in predominantly white schools. During this time, organizations such as the Black Student Union were formed to allow students to preserve their cultural traditions and focus on campaigning for measures that would enable them to validate their racial and ethnic identity.

Consequently, implementing discriminatory policies affects low-income students through standardized evaluations such as the SAT, which was introduced in 1962. The negative side of these standardized tests is that they have played a central role in disqualifying many Black students during admission. However, a recent study by Reynolds et al. (2021) revealed that the SAT is not an ideal determiner of college success, given that it tends to favor the languages communicated by white American students from affluent backgrounds and those from Eurocentric culture. Today, racial segregation persists, given that African American students attend predominantly white schools with buildings named after white men who openly supported beliefs of genocide, slavery, and the inferiority of African Americans. At the same time, hate crimes remain the face of many learning institutions. For instance, Syracuse University in 2019 reported twelve different incidents of anti-Semitic and racist graffiti, which attracted protests from students, and the FBI also became involved (Sasso & David, 2022). Furthermore, racial exclusion manifests in curriculum development as most American schools have adopted educational programs that teach students the significance and history of racial and ethnic minorities. Additionally, several institutions are under-resourced and underfunded, highlighting how Black institutions are undervalued in the American context.

Overall, there is an urgent need for learning institutions to review the exclusionary practices exercised in school settings throughout history as they reflect the persisting racial segregation experienced by African American students. Racism is still a common issue in the American education system. While increasing diversity is a substantial goal, it makes little effort to eliminate the existing institutional barriers that obstruct access and educational opportunities for African American students. Therefore, higher education institutions should collaborate with scholars and policy developers to understand the root cause of inequities in access to quality education, which currently inhibits students' academic success in the African American community.

Racial Disparities in Education

Racial gaps across educational outcomes, including standardized test scores, grades, graduation rates, discipline, college enrollment and completion rates, reveal vast inequities in achievement and attainment between minority and White students at all academic levels. These persistent differences stem from interlocking social, economic, and institutional factors that collectively sustain structural racism within schools.

Causes of Education Disparities

In a study by Williams & Cooper (2019), Socioeconomic status and race are strongly interconnected, with minorities facing disproportionate poverty. This economic disadvantage directly harms academic achievement. Moreover, biases tied to socioeconomic status contribute to unequal education. Teachers frequently perceive minority students from low-income backgrounds as less capable and motivated, propagating divergent expectations and treatment. Financial hardships also limit minority students' access to supplemental learning opportunities, furthering divides.

Eurocentric curricula and predominately White teaching forces alienate minority students, challenging their identity development, sense of belonging, skill building, and academic performance (Dickerson, Gruenewald, and Kemeny, 2004). Racial biases embedded in standardized assessments also disadvantage non-native English speakers. Marginalization of minority students' cultural frames of reference and experiences in academics exacerbates estrangement and underachievement.

School segregation concentrates on poverty and racial isolation, severely impacting minority student outcomes (Henderson et al., 2019). Relatedly, inequitable funding and staffing distributions between minority-serving and predominately White schools deprive the former of essential resources, entrenching achievement gaps (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). Ongoing segregation and unequal resource allocation sustain racial hierarchy.

Socioeconomic Status

Beyond material factors, biases tied to socioeconomic status contribute to racial disparities in education. Teachers frequently perceive minority students from low-income backgrounds through deficit lenses as less capable and motivated, leading to divergent expectations and treatment that propagate inequality (Al Shamsi et al., 2020). Financial hardships also limit disadvantaged minorities' access to supplemental learning opportunities available to more affluent peers, furthering divides. While differences exist even among economically advantaged subgroups, indicating additional factors, socioeconomic barriers remain a primary driver of racial inequities.

Language Proficiency

Limited English proficiency among racial minority students, especially English language learners, is associated with depressed academic performance, graduation rates, and overall educational attainment (Penner et al., 2013). Racial biases embedded in standardized language assessments further disadvantage non-native speakers (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). While numerous elements contribute to achievement gaps, language barriers and culturally-biased tests exacerbate racial stratification. Even minoritized native English speakers contend with whitewashed linguistic expectations marginalizing cultural dialects.

Approaches to Address Racial Disparity in Education

Government-driven initiatives around integration, equitable funding formulas, early interventions, and accountability measures help mitigate disparities systemically (Hernández & Harris, 2022). Embedding culturally responsive teaching practices through diverse curricular materials, antiracist pedagogies, and educator training promotes minority achievement (Hatchimonji, 2022). Considering racism's psychological toll, increased mental health support, trauma-informed practices, and disaggregated data analysis enable healthier school climates that embrace minority students' lived experiences (Persky, Daane, & Jin, 2003). Additionally, outreach programs prepare disadvantaged minorities for higher education through academic enrichment, admissions and financial guidance, and campus exposure, while school-community partnerships build cultural bridges and address challenges holistically (Arneback & Jämte, 2022; Krsmanovic, 2022). Sustained, multifaceted efforts challenging historical biases are imperative.

Current Interventions

Incidents of racial disparities in the education sector are increasing among non-white students, especially African Americans and Hispanics, making them vulnerable to unequal opportunities and experiences. Different strategies and interventions have been set in place to resolve racial injustices in the education system in the long run to neutralize their impacts. These interventions range from policy reforms to introducing changes in education and society engagement efforts. Such a comprehensive approach promotes equitable representation, access, and outcomes for these students.

The first intervention is policy reforms through desegregation policies, affirmative action, and equity legislation, which the government aims to maximize to resolve historical challenges facing non-white students. Affirmative action aims to offer the underrepresented ethnic and minority racial groups preferential treatment in employment and education, thus enhancing opportunities (Anderson et al., 2019). On the other hand, court-mandated desegregation policies aim at creating racially integrated environments that neutralize segregation. In contrast, equity legislation policies aim to push school districts to oversee even distribution of resources, especially in low-income societies.

Another effort is integrating culturally responsive teaching methods, which suggested positive results, is by O'Leary et al.and colleagues (2020) to improve educational outcomes for all students by immersing them in cultural experiences and backgrounds of different cultures. This serves as an essential foundation for the students to understand how they can respond to the unique needs of other cultures in the classroom. Recent studies identify that these stereotypes in the education system have a more remarkable ability to influence how students treat their classmates and perceive themselves. Therefore, implementing anti-bias education programs aims to raise awareness of these biases and prejudices among teachers, administrators, and students and encourages cultivating a culture of inclusivity, respect, and empathy in the classroom.

African American students are vulnerable to unique challenges and stressors due to racial discrimination, and efforts have been made to incorporate mental health services and counseling into the school curriculum. The aim is to provide victims of racial disparity with a safe and non-judgmental opportunity to discuss racial challenges facing them and encourage them to work together to resolve them in an empathic and confidential environment. Moreover, efforts to collect and analyze student academic accomplishments play a central role in helping teachers identify the source and solution of these racial disparities. According to Ottwein (2020), providing African Americans with equal educational opportunities through gifted programs will play an integral role in lifting barriers to information dissemination and admission criteria. Several African American schools expanded their course offerings, ensured training teachers on cultural diversity and inclusion regularly, and how to tailor their education programs to diminish opportunities for biases and foster a collaborative community sustainably. Together, these efforts provide an equitable, inclusive, and supportive learning environment, which is integral in closing the gaps and instilling a fair education system.

Abolishing racial injustice practices in education is a multifaceted issue demanding the implementation of long-term efforts to sustain stakeholder commitment. Combining these interventions provides an opportunity for adjustment to the changing landscapes and supports ongoing evaluation of supportive environments for students from all ethnic and racial backgrounds.

CHAPTER 3

Few studies have identified the risk and resilience factors among African American youth in education. A study by Spencer and colleagues (1994) assessed how indicators of context, self, and action related to measures of risk and resilient outcomes in schools in three different samples. Overall, their sample found that African American youths' experiences of their parent school involvement predicted a composite of their self-system processes, predicting the subjects' school engagement reports. Another study by Myers and Taylor (1998) found that African American youth living in urban poverty run a disproportionately higher risk for adverse psychosocial and educational outcomes than more affluent African American and Caucasian children. Although previous research has been conducted on resilience and risk, limited research is available on the relationship between academic success, health risks and stress among African American youth in schools.

Research Questions

The present study plans to identify appropriate interventions to improve and promote healthier academic outcomes for African American youth. Quantitative analytical approaches are integrated into the research to design questionnaires. These include;

1) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report a lower level of school safety compared to their Hispanic and White counterparts?

2) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report lower school satisfaction than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

3) On the California Healthy Kids Survey, Do African American male youth in Los Angeles County Report lower happiness than their Hispanic and White counterparts?

Measurement

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is offered to students starting in grade 5 (age 10) and up in grades 5, 7, 9 and 11 every other year. It is not a random sample; districts choose to participate or receive state TUPE funding to administer it. The survey includes sections on school climate, safety, student wellness, health risks, school connectedness, protective factors and violence. Additional supplemental and demographic sections allow customization and identification of vulnerabilities. Psychometric analyses by CHKS (n.d.) found the CHKS meets reliability standards with Cronbach's alpha levels between .73 and .89 across subscales. Criterion and construct validity were also demonstrated through logical relationships between crucial risk areas. Any supplemental validity data in the CHKS data request will also be reported. As participation is voluntary, results may reflect districts more actively addressing student needs, limiting generalizability. This potential self-selection bias will be discussed as a study limitation.

Site

The study takes place across all public schools in Los Angeles County. About 70% of school districts in California participate in the CHKS. Most districts administer the CHKS every other year, but about one-third of districts administer it each year.

Sample

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) uses a stratified cluster random sampling method to sample students across California. This means that the sample is representative of the state's population in terms of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic region, and other vital characteristics. The sampling process involves dividing the state into clusters, randomly selecting a subset of schools from each cluster, and then selecting a random sample of students from those schools. The total sample size for the CHKS is approximately 200,000 students, designed to ensure that the results are accurate and representative of the state's youth population.

Recruitment

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is voluntary. One class period is needed to take the survey. The average student can complete the online Core Module in 15 minutes or less. Ninety-five percent of students complete the online Core Module in 30 minutes or less. State law requires the parents, at a minimum, to be notified of a CHKS administration and be offered the opportunity to grant or withhold consent (CALSCHS, 2023).

Instrumentation

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) in Core Elementary School Survey is a comprehensive assessment tool for elementary school students. It begins by collecting demographic data, such as age, grade, gender, and ethnicity, providing context for analysis. The survey evaluates physical health, including nutrition, physical activity, and sleep patterns, while identifying potential support areas. Emotional and mental health is also explored, shedding light on stress and emotional wellbeing. Addressing substance use, bullying, and safety within and outside school settings is crucial for intervention. The survey measures students' sense of connectedness and support at school and home, aiding in understanding their social and emotional wellbeing. The school environment, including climate and health resources, may be considered. The survey may also explore students' social and environmental factors, like living conditions and community resources. Collectively, these components offer a comprehensive view of students' wellbeing. They provide essential data for informed decision-making and the development of targeted intervention strategies to enhance student's overall health and safety.

Data Collection

Data was collected via a coded Likert scale survey, which was then analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and areas of concern. This data can be used at various levels, including individual school assessments, district-wide comparisons, and statewide assessments, to inform decision-making and intervention strategies.

Data Analysis

The three research questions selected for analysis using the California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) data center examine critical aspects of the school experiences of African American male youth in Los Angeles County public compared to their Hispanic/Latinx and White peers.

The first research question focuses specifically on school safety, asking: Do African American male youth report lower perceptions of school safety compared to Hispanic/Latinx and White male youth based on the CHKS? Assessing racial/ethnic group differences in perceived school safety is essential, considering past literature demonstrating that discriminatory treatment and lack of belongingness in school can negatively impact minority students' wellbeing (Evans-Winters & Hines, 2020). Due to historical marginalization, African American youth may view the same school climates as less secure. Their responses illuminated invisible threats influencing their educational experiences.

Likewise, the second research question concentrated on school satisfaction, examining if African American male youth report lower satisfaction levels than their counterparts. Satisfaction measures gauge effective engagement with the academic environment. Understanding variations can identify specific student needs. Previous studies found race and gender shape satisfaction; for instance, Hunter-Johnson (2022) found that African-American students exhibit less trust in teachers and are less satisfied with discipline policies than white peers. Investigating satisfaction by race and gender in LA schools promised to reveal intervention points.

Moreover, the third question explored racial/ethnic differences in reported unhappiness levels, an indicator of emotional wellbeing. Psychological health interplays closely with academic outcomes, so examining discrepancies provided insights. Prior evidence does suggest depressed psychological wellbeing among African American youth stemming from social inequities and exclusion (Lopez, 2020). Assessing unhappiness gives a proxy indication of this critical issue.

These three research focal areas collectively elucidated variances between African American male youth and peers in aspects closely tied to minority students' experiences, engagement, and success within education settings. Examining racial disparities utilizing the CHKS provided direction for enhancing support services, climate interventions, inclusion strategies, and policies to promote equitable opportunities for student health across groups.

CHAPTER 4

While assessing the results of a study through ANOVA, several assumptions need to be met. These include the independence of observations, the normality of residuals, and the homogeneity of variances. The hypothetical questions in the CHKS study guided the data collection process to ensure the independence of observations. The normality of residuals was also assessed through statistical tests or visual inspection of the data distribution. On the contrary, the homogeneity of variances was checked using post-hoc tests to ensure that the variance of the dependent variable was consistent across groups. Addressing these assumptions in the research design and analysis enhanced the validity and reliability of the ANOVA results, providing a solid foundation for drawing meaningful conclusions from the data. Descriptive data is presented in Table 1.

Hypothesis 1

Hypothesis 1 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American male youth in Los Angeles County would report a lower level of school safety compared to their Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to assess the differences in levels of safety between African Americans, Hispanics/Latinx, and Whites. Contrary to our hypothesis, Hispanic/Latinx students reported the lowest levels of safety ( M = 3.14) in comparison to White ( M = 3.32) and African American students ( M = 3.17). There was a significant effect between the three races at the p < .05 level regarding school safety [ F(2, 3875) = 20.211, p = <.001]. Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated mean scores for African American students ( M = 3.17, SD = .871) indicated minute but significant mean differences between Hispanic/Latinx ( M = 3.14, SD = .844) and White students ( M = 3.32, SD = .759).

Table 2

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 1

Note. AA=African Americans

Note. p >.001

Hypothesis 2

Hypothesis 2 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American male youth in Los Angeles County will report a lower level of school satisfaction compared to their Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to assess the differences in levels of school satisfaction between African Americans, Hispanic/Latinx, and Whites. Under our hypothesis, Black/African American students reported the lowest levels of school satisfaction ( M = 4.48) in comparison to White ( M = 4.65) and Hispanic/Latinx peers ( M = 4.60). Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated non-significant mean score differences [ F(2, 837) = .330, p = .719) between Black/African Americans ( M = 4.48, SD = 1.503), Hispanic/Latinx ( M = 4.60, SD = 1.239) and White ( M = 4.65, SD = 1.138).

Table 3

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 2

Note. AA=African Americans

Hypothesis 3

Hypothesis 3 predicted that on the California Healthy Kids Survey, African American male youth in Los Angeles County will report lower levels of happiness compared to their Hispanic and White counterparts. A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to assess the differences in levels of unhappiness between African Americans, Hispanic/Latinx, and Whites. This was reverse-coded, indicating that higher mean values meant lower happiness levels. Following our hypothesis, Black/African American students reported the lowest levels of unhappiness ( M = 2.07) in comparison to White ( M = 1.87) and Hispanic/Latinx peers (M = 1.88). Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni HSD test indicated non-significant mean score differences [ F(2, 850) = 1.012, p = .364) between Black/African Americans ( M = 2.07, SD = .917), Hispanic/Latinx ( M = 1.88, SD = .859) and White ( M = 1.87, SD = .588).

Table 4

Summary of Means, SDs, and ANOVA Results for Hypothesis 3

Note. AA=African Americans

Chapter 5

The CHKS study discusses salient findings about the academic experiences of African American male youth in Los Angeles County, offering a window into the nuanced interplay between race, educational environment, and student wellbeing. These discussions surface multifarious implications concerning the school climate and emotional health of African American students alongside their Hispanic/Latinx and White peers. Furthermore, it discusses the current educational discourse and the enduring racial disparities that shape these youths' educational trajectories.

Regarding school safety, the unanticipated report of lower safety levels among Hispanic/Latinx students deviates from expected outcomes and suggests intricate socio-cultural dynamics at play. The findings here echo more significant societal conversations about differential treatment and the impact of socioeconomic status on educational experiences (Arneback & Jämte, 2022; Trent et al., 2019). Specifically, these disparities resonate with historical patterns of inequitable resource allocation and institutional approaches that may perpetuate a sense of insecurity among marginalized communities. This study found no significant racial differences regarding school satisfaction, paradoxically juxtaposing the reality that African American students reported the lowest satisfaction levels. This suggests latent complexities in how satisfaction is articulated and processed across racial lines. The varied academic outcomes across ethnic groups may arise from differential responses to homogenous educational practices, spotlighting a critical area for introspection in pedagogic approaches (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016).

Similarly, the CHKS analysis of the happiness levels among African American students unveiled a non-significant trend toward greater unhappiness. While not stark, this prompts a critical assessment of factors contributing to their wellbeing, threading into conversations about racial composition in schools and the impact on students' social and academic realities (Evans-Winters & Hines, 2020). The study's introduction steers towards educational structures that uplift critical thinking through racial diversity and fortifying strategies that mitigate vulnerability due to peer harassment.

The resilience observed in African American students is commendable despite the formidable barriers such as cultural incongruity, financial constraints, and socio-educational alienation in predominantly white institutions. This resilience underscores a broader narrative of resistance and adaptation in the face of systemic educational and socioeconomic impediments, affirming the complex interplay of risk and resilience in minority education (Hunter-Johnson, 2022). The examination of racial trauma within educational settings further exacerbates the dialogue on the intricate relation between student experiences and development under the duress of racialized experiences. Educational arenas are settings for cognitive growth and territories where racial identities are contested, fortified, or assailed, affecting African American students to varying degrees concerning their developmental trajectories (Hernández & Harris., 2022).

The historical survey brings forth evidence pointing to entrenched, systemic racial discrimination, with remnants still palpable in today's educational policies and practices. This historical overview, notably referencing Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and subsequent landmark cases, showcases the longevity and stubbornness of racial inequality within educational contexts, necessitating urgent and systemic interventions. These discussions invite scrutiny of the current interventions focused on dismantling the persisting barriers sculpted by racial disparities. Policy reforms, culturally responsive teaching, and augmented mental health services outlined as current interventions form an essential solution toward a more equitable education landscape. They are imperative in ensuring that the echoes of historical exclusions do not reverberate into the future of African American education.

Limitations

This study had several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the sample was limited to African American male youth in Los Angeles County public schools. While focusing on this specific population was intentional, given the study aims, the geographic restriction reduces generalizability to the broader population of African American students nationwide. In particular, findings may not reflect the realities of African American youth in rural areas or other urban centers with different socioeconomic and educational dynamics. Relatedly, intersectional diversity within African American communities along the lines of social class, family structure, or sexual identities could result in a range of academic experiences not fully captured in the data.

Additionally, the quantitative nature of the survey data, while allowing examination of group trends, does not provide a nuanced, qualitative understanding of how socio-cultural and institutional processes shape students' schooling realities. Statistical comparisons of school climate perceptions or wellbeing indicators lack the contextual insights from open-ended interviews or ethnographic observation. As such, the survey items represent researcher-driven categories that may not fully align with emic perspectives or address subtle environmental factors impacting minority youth engagement. Mixed methods incorporating participatory assessments could strengthen the cultural validity of findings.

The voluntary nature of district participation in administering the CHKS also presents a self-selection threat where included counties may have more robust student support initiatives. If less-resourced districts with more significant unmet needs are underrepresented, reported racial disparities could be muted, distorting the scope of current inequities. Relatedly, social desirability bias could affect student responses regarding sensitive topics like discrimination or mental health. Steps to maximize anonymity protections help minimize this bias but do not eliminate it.

Additionally, the cross-sectional rather than longitudinal design collects data at one point. Tracking students' trajectories over multiple years could reveal developmental patterns in how environmental stressors, coping skills, or shifting identities influence academic outcomes, motivation, and engagement. Capturing such changes may be especially relevant for historically marginalized youth with evolving awareness of systemic barriers as they progress through school.

On the other hand, the complex role of intersecting student identities beyond race and gender could provide essential nuance to the findings. Exploring disparities along socioeconomic lines using eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch could help disentangle the effects of racial marginalization from class barriers. Similarly, accounting for special education status, home language, or immigration generation would allow parsing unique challenges tied to a disability, cultural adaptation, or documentation that minority students disproportionately face. Ultimately, this study provided an initial glimpse into equity issues in Los Angeles schools but has substantial room to expand in scope, depth, and inclusivity moving forward. Pursuing multifaceted analyses of student experiences can strengthen the knowledge base for targeted, culturally-attuned interventions promoting success for all youth.

Recommendation

While this study offers valuable insights into the academic experiences of African American male youth in Los Angeles County, additional research is imperative to inform supportive policies and practices promoting equitable education. First, incorporating diverse geographic contexts beyond urban counties would strengthen generalizability and allow for a comparison of the realities of African American students in rural, suburban, and urban spaces nationally. Vast differences in school funding, offerings, demographic composition, and cultural dynamics likely contribute to varied outcomes needing exploration. Additionally, qualitative, ethnographic, or participatory assessments capturing emic perspectives through student voices and observations could contextualize quantitative findings on achievement patterns, motivation, belonging, and wellbeing. Mixed methodology leveraging cultural validity from community-centered designs would enhance the research rigor and applied impact.

Relatedly, enhanced engagement with intersectional frameworks around class, family structure, sexual orientation, citizenship status and disability could unveil compounded marginalization for African American youth holding multiple minoritized identities. Quantitatively disaggregating academic performance, retention, and climate perceptions based on income, documentation status, LGBTQ identity, ability, and other constructs would clarify varied needs. A qualitative exploration of navigating overlapping systemic barriers across social institutions could also further practical support. Additionally, longitudinal tracking from early schooling through college and career entry would provide invaluable data on how environmental stressors, discrimination, and protective factors influence youth development and outcomes over time. Awareness of status and opportunity gaps often evolves developmentally, shaping academic trajectories. Capturing such processes could direct age-appropriate interventions.

Critically, the sampling frame should expand to diverse counties nationwide for broader claims and comparisons. Drawing participants proportionately across income levels would help separate racialized effects from socioeconomic obstacles. Overrepresenting struggling districts and underserved communities could better target unmet needs. Enhanced cultural validity procedures like member-checking preliminary themes, collaborating on survey design, or participatory analysis would also uplift community knowledge. Funding community researchers as equitable partners rather than passive subjects can enhance relevance and reciprocity. From a policy standpoint, school districts must move beyond simplistic diversity commitments toward actionable work addressing systemic racism through curriculum, tracking, admissions, funding, and cultural competency training. Academic studies can guide these efforts with context-specific evidence.

Additionally, further research should emphasize school-level strategies to support marginalized students through professional development, expanding teachers' cultural awareness and responsiveness. Evaluating implicit bias training, restorative justice programs, or racial socialization curricula across classroom settings and districts would clarify best practices for national scaling. To that end, stronger partnerships between education scholars, school administrations, and communities of color must inform the research. For example, community advisory boards reviewing proposed projects could strengthen sensibility to lived experiences and priority needs. Ultimately, nuanced, mixed-method examinations of intersecting student identities across diverse locales can illuminate pathways toward equitable education, where strengths-based, culturally validating pedagogies empower all youth. The journey beyond documented disparities toward lasting justice requires community representation and participation at all stages, from conceptualization through application.

Conclusion

This study corroborates the need for a grand, inter-sectional strategy to challenge the status quo of educational inequity. It ascertains that awareness of differential treatment, socioeconomic disparities, and systematic racial traumas must enlighten the design of academic reforms, policy restructuring, and practice within schools. Moving forward requires an indomitable pursuit of diversity, inclusivity, and support systems that transcend mere rhetoric, cultivating a fertile ground for all students, especially those historically disenfranchised, to thrive. The trajectory from recognizing disparities to realizing true educational equality necessitates concerted efforts across all societal structures, thus embracing these critical examinations as beacons for illumination in the onward journey.

Ultimately, the findings reveal more work is needed to disentangle the multifaceted factors influencing African American students' wellbeing, engagement, and success in schools often not designed for their socio-cultural thriving. The discussion situates these patterns within broader conversations on enduring educational inequities along racial lines stemming from biased curricula, discriminatory tracking policies, and cultural contradictions between minority youth identities and white-normed institutions. These historical realities underscore the need for continued research and policy efforts promoting systemic change for justice. The study's limitations centered on generalizability, researcher biases, social desirability effects, self-selection, and variable centering that future work should address through inclusive mixed methodology.

Key recommendations include enhanced engagement with intersectionality, qualitative illumination of lived experiences, community-driven participatory research practices, nationwide sampling reaching diverse locales, and longitudinal tracking of within-group heterogeneity across developmental stages. Additionally, scaling targeted professional development opportunities for teachers and school leaders related to cultural competence, restorative justice programs, and antiracist education could spark impactful transformation. Ultimately, realizing the vision for racially equitable schooling free from systemic oppression requires bringing affected communities to the forefront as authorities over their own experiences and advocates for responsive redress. Academics must move from observing inequities to enacting change through reciprocal collaboration. This study provided a reminder of persistent racial injustices in Los Angeles County schools that should reignite advocacy efforts, policy revisions, and critical consciousness-raising to empower minority youth futures. The collective work ahead necessitates relentless critique of neutrality myths, intersectional solidarity, and platforming of scholarship and stories exposing realities of marginalization.

Anderson, R. E., McKenny, M. C., & Stevenson, H. C. (2019). EMBR ace: Developing a racial socialization intervention to reduce racial stress and enhance racial coping among Black parents and adolescents. Family Process, 58(1), 53-67.

Al Shamsi, H., Almutairi, A. G., Al Mashrafi, S., & Al Kalbani, T. (2020). Implications of language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman medical journal, 35(2), e122.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Lopez, A. E. (2020). Anti-Black racism in education: School leaders' journey of resistance and hope. Handbook on promoting social justice in education, 1935-1950.

Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A., & Allen, D. N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In Mastering Modern Psychological Testing: Theory and Methods (pp. 573-613). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Sasso, P. A., & Davis, K. (2022). Jewish Fraternities and Sororities as Spaces of Resistance Against Antisemitism. Georgia Journal of College Student Affairs, 38(1), 59-81.

Spencer, L. A. M. (2016). Exploring the transition experiences of successful international undergraduate students at a public research university in the USA: The impact on international student success and retention (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida).

The California School Climate, Health, and Learning Survey (CalSCHLS) System - FAQs. (n.d.). Calschls.org. Retrieved October 30, 2023, from https://calschls.org/resources/faqs/

Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: using what we already know to take action. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(4), 606.