Semaine Trois/SNote

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Organization of Write-up

27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

All information organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format

24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Information generally organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format

21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

Errors in format; information intermittently organized

0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

Errors in format; information disorganized

Thoroughness of History

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

Thoroughly documents all pertinent history components for type of note; includes critical as well as supportive information

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Documents most pertinent history components; includes critical information

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Fails to document most pertinent history components; Lacks some critical information or rambling in history

0 (0%) - 13 (13%)

Minimal history; critical information missing

Thoroughness of Physical Exam

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Thoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Documents most pertinent examination components

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Documents some pertinent examination components

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Physical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components

Diagnostic Reasoning

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes all secondary problems. Cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Assessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes most secondary problems.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Assessment mostly consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Assessment not consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests

Treatment Plan/Patient Education

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Treatment plan and patient education addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Evidence based decisions. Cost effective treatment. Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Treatment plan and patient education addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Treatment plan and patient education fail to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Reflection is brief, vague. and does not discuss anything that would have been done in addition to or differently.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Minimal treatment plan and/or patient education addressed Reflection is absent.

Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.

Total Points: 100