6 to 7 page Budget Proposal related to OSU Athletic Revenue Sharing
2
Executive Summary
Queensborough Community College (QCC) has some institutional strategic goals that relate to
faculty research and student participation in research activities, which affect grant management which is
a revenue source. 26% of QCC’s revenue sources come from government grants and contracts (IPEDS
2020). This revenue stream is the second largest revenue steam after local appropriations which
account for 31% of the schools revenue (IPEDS 2020). This budget proposal supports the attainment of
the following institutional strategic goals: Goal 1: Increase enrollment in STEM majors, Goal 2: Increase
faculty scholarship and research impact, and Goal 3: Adopt best business practices; redesign business
processes and streamline administrative functions.
This budget proposal is to request the creation of budget lines and allocation of continued funds
for dedicated staff and supportive resources for QCC’s Office of Research. There is a need for dedicated
full-staff in the Office of Research. Specifically, being proposed are full-time salary lines for (1)
leadership/ Dean for Research, (1) Human Research Protection Program (HRPP Coordinator), an
additional (1) Grants Compliance Specialist, and (2) Administrative Assistants. Additionally, the college
would benefit from investing in an Electronic Research Administration (eRA) system that would support
these personnel in the management of research award administration duties.
The academic hallmark of QCC is Undergraduate Research. The college provides some of the
best Undergraduate Research experiences for students in the City University of New York (CUNY),
through programs funded by private sponsors and government sponsors at city, state, and federal
levels. While faculty conduct their research, they provide research opportunities to students, which
increases enrollment in STEM majors, and create pathways to four year institutions and also, they are
able continue their own individual research.
Also, some faculty conduct pedagogical research that can involve student data or student
surveys. All of this research activity, especially in the cases that are funded through external sponsors or
3
in the cases where human subject research is involved require a watchful compliance eye so that the
faculty, staff, and college are protected from negative consequences in the form of litigation or
discontinuation of funding. The current employee and organizational structure that support sponsored
research projects does not feasibly support the school in providing effective compliance guidance and
support. Based on the 2020 IPEDS Data, 26% of QCC’s revenue comes from government grants and
contracts. This is the second largest revenue source following local appropriations at 31%. This budget
proposal will justify the necessity for additional staff and resources at the QCC’s Office of Research.
Institutional Context
QCC is one of the community colleges in the largest public university network in the nation. QCC
is a medium-sized, public, two-year community college that is part of the City University of New York
(CUNY). CUNY is the nation’s largest urban public university and is a network of 25 colleges in the five
boroughs of New York City. This network has two-year, four-year, and professional studies colleges. QCC
is one of seven community colleges in CUNY. The college is a Hispanic-Serving Institution. The college is
accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education and is organized into “five
academies—Business, Health Related Sciences, Science, Technologies, Engineering, & Mathematics
(STEM) Academy, Liberal Arts, and the Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)” (QCC, 2021b, para. 5).
QCC’s mission is to provide an “affordable, high-quality education to pre-college, college, and
lifelong learners” (QCC, 2021a, para. 1). QCC’s largest revenue source is local appropriations accounting
for 31% of the schools revenue stream. Government grants and contracts come in a second, accounting
for 26% of the school’s revenue stream. Tuition and fees only account for a 15% of the school’s revenue
stream. State appropriations account for 21% of the school’s revenue stream. The school does not have
any return on investments, and basically nonexistent sources or relationships that yield private gifts and
grants. The student retention rate is 62% (IPEDS 2020) and graduation rates 28% (IPEDS 2020). QCC’s
expenses per full-time (FTE) student are:
4
QCC’s expenses per full-time (FTE) student (IPEDS 2020)
Instruction per full time enrollment $11,048
Research $106
Public Service $99
Academic Support $1,238 Institutional Support $ 2, 389 Student services $1, 841 Other core expenses $2,656
The Office of Research provides support to the campus community’s research and student
research experiences, the Office’s key role is to promote research activity. The office collaborates with
the Office of Grants/Sponsored Programs to provide grant proposal support, award management, and
provide compliance support. The main goal of QCC’s Office of Research is to promote integrity and
embrace values and principles.
QCC’s Office of Research is part of the Office of Academic Affairs. Currently, QCC’s Office of
Research is staffed by a Faculty Fellow for Research Activities, who is a faculty member that has been
released from teaching for three semesters. This Faculty Fellow serves as the Research Integrity Officer
(RIO) for the campus. This RIO role was previously held by a Dean for Research, but was eliminated due
to budget cuts due to the pandemic in August 2020. The college has paused all hiring and instead is
finding creative ways to cover crucial responsibilities. The RIO receives support in part from a Grants
Compliance Specialist that is part of the Office of Grants/Sponsored Programs. Additionally, one other
faculty member that is not formally part of the Office of Research, serves as the Human Research
Protection Program (HRPP) Coordinator, whose responsibility is to ensure that projects that involve
human subjects (people) adhere to HRPP regulations. That is a total of 3 employees working to support
an entire school in research compliance support.
5
The Dean for Research will report to the Provost. The two grants compliance specialists and
HRPP Coordinator will report to the Dean for Research. Both administrative assistants will report to the
Dean for Research. One administrative assistant will work to support the Dean for Research. The other
administrative assistant will work directly to provide clerical and operational support of two grant
compliance specialists and HRPP coordinator. These changes will cost the college an approximate
additional $300,000 in salaries, including fringe benefits.
Current Proposed Change
(1) Faculty Fellow for Research Activities (RIO) (Released from teaching for 3 semesters) - $120,000
(1) Dean for Research – Full time- $150,000
Hiring (1) Full-Time Research Leadership
(1) Grants Compliance Specialist - $90,000
(2) Grant Compliance Specialists – Full –time -$180,000 (annual salary $90,000 each)
Hiring of (1) additional Full- Time midlevel support staff
(1) Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Coordinator (Professor that in addition to instructional responsibilities, receives Non-Teaching Adjunct pay for HRPP coordinator responsibilities) - $49/per hour – (Works about 10 hours a week)- $2,500
(1) Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Coordinator – Full-time -$98,000
Hiring of (1) Full-specialized Research Leadership
(2) Administrative Assistants – Full –time -$80,000 (annual salary $40,000 each)
(2) Administrative Assistants
Additionally, it is recommended that the college invest in an Electronic Research Administration
(eRA) system that would support these personnel in the management of research administration and
grants administration duties. If all goes well with these creation of positions, looking to the future it is
recommended that also CUNY invests in HRPP protocol management system, like IRB Manager.
Proposal
QCC’s reported an enrollment of 14,035 in 2019 (QCC 2020 Factbook). As mentioned before, the
academic hallmark of the college is undergraduate research. For a community college, QCC notably has
many Undergraduate Research Program opportunities where students can participate in undergraduate
6
research and receive stipends for their participation. Also, many of these programs are funded by city,
state, federal, and private funders. Especially, when dealing with federal funding, effective post-award
management of research funding is of the utmost importance. Previously, QCC did not have dedicated
staff in place to provide research support and guidance. The College has had some recent challenges in
with research award mismanagement, and part of the corrective action plan is to have a strong research
supports, training, and compliance review practices in place for Principal Investigators, project
personnel, and students involved in research. Keeping this recommendation in mind, this proposal is for
the creation of full time staff lines that would outfit the operations of a fully operational QCC Office of
Research.
Cost /Benefit Analysis
Projected COSTS Projected BENEFITS Initial Costs
- Salaries (including fringe) -$300,000 - Office Space/Renovations- $85,000 - Supplies $15,000 - Furniture $25,000 - Equipment $80,000 - eRa Software &other Computer hardware/ software -
$200,000 - eRa software implementation-$0
Total Initial Costs: $705,000
Cost Benefits - Avoidance of fines for non-compliance especially with
federal funders - Minimize risk: The number of compliance issues and
mismanagement decreases - The number of faculty with experience in research award
management increases - Knowledge of best practices increases
Faculty & Staff Benefits - Increase faculty scholarship and research impact - Maximize efficiency: Increased accurate support in the
proper management of grants and sponsored projects. - Adopt best business practices and streamline
administrative functions. - Collaboration between Principal Investigators and
Research Administrators increase - Decrease the administrative burden of grants
management for PIs - Dedicated support to navigate the Internal Review Board
(IRB) process for projects that involve human subject research
- Streamline process, have information in a centralized place, decrease for the potential for error.
Student Benefits - Increase the number of students that participated in
funded research programs making them more marketable by 5% the initial year, and by 10% the second year
- Increase enrollment in STEM majors
Ongoing Costs - Operating Expenses of Research $20,000 - Salaries, Benefits, & Postemployment benefits -$375,000 - Tech support and renewal of eRA management services -
$144,000 - Professional development and training - $10,000 - Market the eRA system to all levels of grants
management stakeholders $0 Total Ongoing Costs: $549,000
7
Rationale
Much of the research that takes place at QCC is faculty member’s individual research or
pedagogical research .Faculty members have a commitment of teaching, research, and service that they
must maintain for a continued status of good scholarship. Faculty when approaching their research may
recruit students in mentor –mentee relationship as a criteria of a particular grant or sponsored project.
This scenario requires proper research compliance support and oversight from the college. Also,
sometimes faculty would like to collect and use student data from classes they teach, or partner with
colleagues to compare instructional methods in their respective classes under the same subject,
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval is needed in these cases. Many times faculty and staff do not
keep abreast of the compliance requirements needed to conduct research. They are busy conducting
research themselves and in many instances have had little formal education on educating trainees to
conduct research (Wright, 2008) Many times colleges fail to proactively provide appropriate compliance
oversight, but instead provide oversight reactively.
‘ “Mentor/PIs should provide a more formal process of initial training for their graduate students
as they join a research project. This should include coverage of IRB regulations and the responsibility
inherent in maintaining the integrity of research”. (Wright, 2008) But, often times with the demands of
being instructional staff and engaging students, PIs do not follow through on ensuring that students and
even them seeking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training. QCC Office of Research could
ensure that those connections and actions actually take place, and take some of the administrative
burden in the form of recordkeeping, and monitoring policies that impact the faculty research
community, as well as monitor for funding opportunities. The creation for a budget line for a full-time
Dean for Research would demonstrate the college’s due diligence to establish an overarching
authoritative resource and oversight for support on research, potentially sparing the college from bad
publicity, and avoiding allegations of misconduct, and spending large sums of money research
8
misconduct fines. The Dean for Research would provide RCR training to faculty, promote research
initiatives and community, and provide guidance to the two grants compliance specialists and HRPP
coordinator. RCR training of faculty and students is often a requirement for faculty and students in
federal research grants.
Research misconduct can really stain a faculty member’s record of scholarship, and is
considered a violation of the research community’s ethical standard. Rarely, does an individual intend to
commit research misconduct. . “In many instances (they) have had little formal education on educating
trainees to conduct research.” (Wright, 2008) The creation of budget line for two grants compliance
specialists to review funded projects routinely and make the Dean of Research aware of issues that arise
would assist faculty that has had little formal education from mishap. This support being available to
faculty will fill in the gaps where they may not follow through or keep up with policies that can have
impact of future funding for QCC. 26% of QCC’s revenue sources come from government grants and
contracts (IPEDS 2020). This is the college’s second largest revenue source after local appropriations.
(31%)
Two administrative assistants would provide basic clerical and administrative support. One
administrative assistant would support the Dean of Research. The other administrative assistant would
support the HRPP Coordinator and two grants compliance specialists.
There is a major distinction in the word of compliance between research and research that
involves human subjects (people). “These two sets of research regulations are distinguished from each
other by having different foci of enforcement, priorities of protection, oversight officials, oversight
procedures, seizure of evidence, standards of proof, expectations of privacy, and appeal procedures for
researchers who are subject to adverse findings and penalties”.(Bierer, 2014) Institutional Review Board
(IRB) Approval needs to be obtained before a research project involving people can take place. The fines
and the consequences for not adhering to ethical code of conduct for research involving human subjects
9
are very large. At QCC, this human subject research is mostly pedagogical. The Dean for Research would
be responsible to promote ethical code of practice when research involves students, student data, new
instructional methods, use of and student information in a published work. The HRPP coordinator’s area
of support focuses on supporting faculty who have IRB inquiries, reviewing proposed protocols, and
issuing IRB approval. Currently, the HRPP Coordinator role at QCC is covered by a professor part time.
This professor receives Non-Teaching Adjunct hours payment for the additional work outside of
instructional duties to support the faculty and the college. Human Subject research is too much of a big
stakes ticket item in order to have an employee serving part time to provide support. The two grants
compliance specialists will review and field HRPP inquiries to the HRPP Coordinator as they arise and
support with the preliminary screening of the protocols.
For this new and improved QCC Office to effectively service the campus community, eRA
software is a requirement. Staff reductions and high employee turnover in offices is one reason for QCC
to invest in an eRA system. QCC has had high employee turnover in the Office of Research and the
Office of Grants/Sponsored programs. Having sponsored project compliance information in a centralized
place, leaves the content and research award information available to employees at any time in the
Office of Research. Sponsors are adding transparency measures and sponsor demand receipt, review,
award management, and close-out of federal grants. In order for an eRA system or software to be
successful at an intuition, all the stake holders must be convinced of its value. Some of the budget would
might go to “other expenses”, as promotion of the ease of use of the eRA is important to get the campus
community board.
There will also be the need for an office space, equipment (such as computers, monitors, copiers) and
office furniture. The budget for these full-time staff would be phased in over time over three years.
CUNY has many budgetary challenges, therefore the roll out of this budget would be gradual to account
for CUNY’s budget constraints.
10
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 - Hire Dean for Research - Hire Administrative
Assistant - Purchase Office
furniture, equipment, and software
- Purchase eRA software - Train existing staff on
eRA software and begin implantation in internal department operations.
- Hire HRPP Coordinator - Hire 2nd Administrative
Assistant - Market and Train PIs
and faculty to use eRA system
- Hire Additional Grants Compliance Specialist
- Fully implement eRA system
In order to have functioning and effective QCC Office or Research, the budget must include Full-
time staff lines. It is pertinent to create staff lines for leadership, midlevel support staff, clerical support,
and a software to maximize efficiency, mitigate and minimize risks, and increase communication. For a
community college, QCC is very immersed in all things research at a faculty and student level. The
college must invest in the aspects which make it unique and marketable, by establishing resources and
staff that maintain grant funding, help the college avoid potential allegations, provide support o faculty,
protect the college, and build a solid reputation that increase the likelihood of future funding
opportunities. This proposal has demonstrated that the positive benefits justifies the additional
increased costs.
11
References
Bierer, B. (2014, July). Research Misconduct Involving Noncompliance I Human Subjects Support by the
Public Health Service; Reconciling Separate Regulatory Systems. Hastings Center Report. Retrieved
June 25, 2021, https://onlinelibrary- wileycom.ezproxy.neu.edu/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/hast.336
Eyerly, R. (2000, November). The Long and Winding Road: The Politics of Building and ERA System. The
Journal of Research Administration., Retrieved June 25, 2021, https://www-proquest-
com.ezproxy.neu.edu/docview/216586328/fulltextPDF/897F5556476A4918PQ/1?accountid=12826
The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. (2020). IPEDS Data Feedback Report: CUNY
Queensborough Community College (IPEDSDFR_190673) [Data Set]. National Center for
Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/dfr/2020/ReportPDF.aspx?unitID=190673
Queensborough Community College. (2021a). Mission, Queensborough Community College. Retrieved
June 25, 2021, from https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/about/mission.html
Wright, D (2008, May 28). Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in
Closed ORI Cases, Science and Engineering Ethics, Retrieved June 25, 2021,
https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.neu.edu/content/pdf/10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5.pdf
postsecondary/reports/2020/10/28/491739/tapping-local-support-strengthen-community-
colleges/