MHA6100 WEEK 2 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 1/2
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points
Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points
Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–15) 15 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate level
critical thinking. A
purpose statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 15Student did not submit
assignment.
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most
of expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement is
present and appropriate
for the assignment.
Assignment meets all
expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points
Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points
Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–15) 15 points
Criterion Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 15Student did not submit
assignment.
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate, apply
and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points
Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points
Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14– 15) 15 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
/ 15Student did not submit
assignment.
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major points,
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms) information
Synthesizes and justifies
(defends, explains,
validates, confirms)
information gleaned from
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 2/2
Total / 50
Overall Score
Close
resources
to apply
concepts in
the
assignment.
concepts and
strategies.
but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification to
support major topics.
Uses one credible
resource in the
assignment.
gleaned from sources
to support major
points presented. Uses
a minimum of two
credible resources in
the assignment.
sources to support major
points presented. Uses
three credible resources for
the assignment, including
at least one scholarly peer-
reviewed resource.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–2) 2 points
Satisfactory (C Range) 3 points
Proficient (B Range) 4 points
Exemplary (A Range) 5 points
Criterion Score
Uses correct spelling,
grammar, and
professional
vocabulary. Provides
credible resources
using correct APA
format.
/ 5Student did not submit
assignment.
Contains many (≥5)
grammar, spelling,
punctuation and APA
errors that interfere
with the reader’s
understanding.
Contains a few
(3–4) grammar,
spelling,
punctuation and
APA errors.
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
with no errors.
Contains a few (1–
2) APA format
errors.
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
with no errors.
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 1 point minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 35 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 40 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 45 points minimum