Rhetorical Analysis

profilekhaled alshehr
RhetoricalAnalysis_HEssayAssignmentSheet.docx

Critical Analysis Essay Assignment Sheet

In response to a persuasive text, 1) write a brief and objective paragraph summary demonstrating your understanding of the content; and 2) critically analyze and evaluate the text (with some balance), making sure to address the author’s intended audience, purpose and method of persuasion. Include a thesis statement and citations. This essay is a culmination of the skills and concepts developed in previous essays (self-reflection, summarization, problematization, evaluation), ultimately building your credibility as a critical thinker writing to a more academic audience. 5 - 6 pages.

* Note: rubric is not exhaustive but intended to provide basic assignment expectations

Criteria

A

B

C

D

Summary

Summary is succinct (no more than 1 paragraph), neutral, introduces article clearly, and is stylistically superior (diverse signal verbs)

Summary presents main points of article but is either too short or long. Mostly neutral but includes a few evaluative words. Stylistically average

Summary lacks clear introduction to article. Too short or long. Contains evaluative language and is stylistically repetitive

Summary is either non-existent or much too long. Contains overt evaluation. Original article is misrepresented and/or taken out of context

Thesis Statement

Well-crafted, clear and concise introductory thesis statement outlining overall judgment and central points

Thesis statement presents judgment but lacks central points and could be further developed

Discernible thesis but broad, unfocused and doesn’t outline essay structure

No discernible thesis statement

Analysis/Evaluation

Exclusively focused on method (not content). Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals are thoughtfully discussed

Exclusively focused on method (not content). Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals are discussed but could be deeper

Contains elements of content. Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals examination is lacking or missing

Heavy focus on content. Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals examination is weak or missing

Evidence

Specific textual evidence is provided (paraphrasing, quotes) to support all evaluative claims

Specific evidence is mostly presented but is lacking for some evaluative claims

Supporting evidence is vague and inconsistently presented

Evidence is severely lacking and/or vague

Organization

Logically organized, follows thesis statement, and includes clear topic sentences to introduce new points

Mostly structured but includes repetitive or misplaced points. New points are not clearly introduced

Essay lacks a strong focus/structure. Often breaks from thesis statement and new points are not introduced

Distractingly disorganized (no topic sentences or clear indication of where essay is going)

Mechanics

Grammatically error free with correct citation, appropriate pg. number and proper format (font, spacing, etc.)

Minor grammatical errors with mostly correct citation. Slightly under appropriate pg. number

Significant grammatical errors, and/or under appropriate pg. number. Format issues, including citation

Unacceptable grammatical/format errors. Significant citation issues (or no works cited)