Rhetorical Analysis
Critical Analysis Essay Assignment Sheet
* Note: rubric is not exhaustive but intended to provide basic assignment expectations
|
Criteria |
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
Summary |
Summary is succinct (no more than 1 paragraph), neutral, introduces article clearly, and is stylistically superior (diverse signal verbs) |
Summary presents main points of article but is either too short or long. Mostly neutral but includes a few evaluative words. Stylistically average |
Summary lacks clear introduction to article. Too short or long. Contains evaluative language and is stylistically repetitive |
Summary is either non-existent or much too long. Contains overt evaluation. Original article is misrepresented and/or taken out of context |
|
Thesis Statement |
Well-crafted, clear and concise introductory thesis statement outlining overall judgment and central points |
Thesis statement presents judgment but lacks central points and could be further developed |
Discernible thesis but broad, unfocused and doesn’t outline essay structure |
No discernible thesis statement |
|
Analysis/Evaluation
|
Exclusively focused on method (not content). Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals are thoughtfully discussed |
Exclusively focused on method (not content). Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals are discussed but could be deeper |
Contains elements of content. Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals examination is lacking or missing |
Heavy focus on content. Audience, purpose and rhetorical appeals examination is weak or missing |
|
Evidence |
Specific textual evidence is provided (paraphrasing, quotes) to support all evaluative claims |
Specific evidence is mostly presented but is lacking for some evaluative claims |
Supporting evidence is vague and inconsistently presented |
Evidence is severely lacking and/or vague |
|
Organization |
Logically organized, follows thesis statement, and includes clear topic sentences to introduce new points |
Mostly structured but includes repetitive or misplaced points. New points are not clearly introduced |
Essay lacks a strong focus/structure. Often breaks from thesis statement and new points are not introduced |
Distractingly disorganized (no topic sentences or clear indication of where essay is going) |
|
Mechanics |
Grammatically error free with correct citation, appropriate pg. number and proper format (font, spacing, etc.) |
Minor grammatical errors with mostly correct citation. Slightly under appropriate pg. number |
Significant grammatical errors, and/or under appropriate pg. number. Format issues, including citation |
Unacceptable grammatical/format errors. Significant citation issues (or no works cited) |