Psychology Assignment 4

profilenikkieramsey
Resubmission_MarthaRamsey-32291791.pdf

1

Online versus In-Person Counseling: A Review of Existing Studies

Martha Ramsey

Saint Leo University

Capsthesis/Capstone Project II: PSY 695

Instructor Lara Ault

March 17, 2024

2

Abstract

Online psychotherapy and in-person counseling differ with respect to their effectiveness. The

current study was guided by a set of research questions which were considered in its review

approach. The search for the articles was restricted to the following search terms and phrases,

online therapy mental health outcomes, telepsychiatry effectiveness, internet-based interventions

for mental health, and the advantages and disadvantages of online counseling. The search was

confined to English language articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024. The chosen

time frame coincided with the period of the COVID19 pandemic. This also marked the period

when the use of online psychotherapy became common place due to lockdowns and restricted

movements. The subjects in the articles were those that had participated in online psychotherapy.

A total of 15 peer-reviewed sources were selected for the review after consideration of various

criteria. The selected articles not only met the criteria, but also satisfied the requirements for

research subjects, method, variables, and research outcomes. The findings of the study

established that in-person counseling was favored for effectiveness while online psychotherapy

was favored for convenience and affordability.

3

Online versus In-Person Counseling: A Review of Existing Studies

Background

With the advancement in internet and digital technology, access to critical services such

as healthcare and support services has become easier (Greenwood et al., 2022). The proliferation

of internet technology and online communication has enabled accessibility to several health

services. Mental health services remain among the healthcare services that can be accessed

through online interaction with experts (Khan et al., 2021). However, the question as to whether

online counseling is more effective compared to in-person counseling widely remained

answered. Whereas online counseling can equally impact patients in reducing psychological

distresses, its effectiveness in terms of creating personal connections with the therapists,

increasing level of satisfaction after use, being executed devoid of distractions remain areas of

concern (Békés et al., 2021). Online counseling therapy has always been associated with ease of

access and affordability thereby making it considered by patients who give preferences to these

factors (Ierardi et al., 2022). Renn et al. (2019) opine that barriers such as location of counseling

services, stigma, and time commitment make some patients prefer online or digital

psychotherapy to in-person counseling (Renn et al., 2019).

The current study focused on the effectiveness of internet therapy as compared to

traditional in-person counseling in the prevention and management of mental health challenges.

The study took a narrative review approach using a systematic search strategy that considered

articles published in the year 2019 up to the year 2024. The selected time frame factored in the

issue of mental health challenges during the COVID19-pandemic because online psychotherapy

was significantly used during the pandemic period due to lockdowns and constrained movements

of people. The researcher intended to use more than more than 5600 articles for this purpose.

provide a Method header. This is your method section I believe.

4

However, this was narrowed down to a manageable size by relying on the research questions,

research problem, and research purpose. There are parameters that guided the inclusion and

exclusion criteria for the articles that were used in the study. The use of English language in the

writing and publication of an article was a mandatory requirement during the evaluation. The

study prioritized peer-reviewed journal articles in the review. Conference abstract, non-peer

reviewed articles, and grey literature were not considered for the evaluation.

Problem Statement: The use of online counseling and therapy versus in-person counseling in

terms of effectiveness widely remains unexplored with respect to review of the existing studies.

Purpose of the Review: The current narrative review provides an in-depth analysis of current

literature on the effectiveness of internet-based therapy compared to in-person counseling and

therapy. The review provides information that can help patients and mental healthcare

professionals make informed decisions when using these approaches to counseling and therapy.

The selected articles for the review contained subjects who had used both online psychotherapy

and in-person counseling. These selected articles provided information that was used in the

comparison of the types of counseling in terms of their effectiveness.

Research Questions

1. How effective is online psychotherapy in terms of client satisfaction and personal

interaction as compared to traditional in-person therapy?

2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of online therapy?

3. How is online therapy is perceived either negatively or positively by the young and old

demographics?

good!

5

Method

The current paper utilized a narrative review with a systematic search strategy. No

measurement tools or devices were used as a guideline in obtaining the information for the

research. The search for studies that were included in the review was guided by the topic and

research questions. The researcher considered several constraints that helped to narrow down the

materials that were selected for the review. English language criterion for journalism was

considered a critical component in the evaluation. English language use was a key consideration

because studies and papers published in non-English languages were not only challenging to

comprehend and synthesize but could also comprise the rigor of the review. Several websites that

included PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were explored for the purpose of extracting

the right articles. Eligibility criteria and evaluation used in this paper is explained below.

Eligibility Criteria

Peer-reviewed articles published between year 2019 to the year 2024 were prioritized to

maintain the rigor of the review. The selected time frame limited the review because the search

targeted peer-reviewed articles which were published during the COVID19-pandemic.

Additionally, online psychotherapy was frequently used during the pandemic more than any

other time in the history of the United States of America. The search process was confined to

search terms that included online psychotherapy mental health outcomes, telepsychiatry

effectiveness, internet-based interventions for mental health, and advantages and disadvantages

of online counselling. When the search phrase online psychotherapy and mental health outcomes

was searched, 3500 materials were found from the Saint Leo University library. When the search

term was paraphrased to focus on peer-reviewed articles between the year 2019 to the year 2024,

the search yielded 89 articles. When the terms virtual counseling or virtual psychotherapy were

6

used, the search yielded 389 materials from Saint University Library, 28 materials from PubMed,

6 materials from PsycINFO, and 89 materials from Google Scholar. When the search term was

paraphrased to include peer-reviewed articles published between the year 2019 to the year 2024,

only 12 articles were found in the University Library, 34 articles were found in Google Scholar, 3

articles were retrieved from PubMed, and 2 articles were found in PsycINFO.

The search term telepsychiatry effectiveness yielded 600 articles from the Saint Leo

University Library and 891 articles from Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycINFO. This

particular search also yielded a total of 69 books from all these libraries. When the search was

narrowed to peer-reviewed articles from the year 2019 to the year 2024 a total of 19 articles were

retrieved from these libraries. The search term internet-based interventions for mental health

yielded a total of 96 materials from Saint Leo University, 697 materials from Google Scholar,

PsycINFO, and PubMed. When the search was narrowed by paraphrasing the term to include

peer-reviewed articles published in the 2019 to the year 2024, a total 27 peer-reviewed articles

were found from these libraries. When search term advantages and disadvantages of online

counseling was used, a total of 123 articles were retrieved from Saint Leo University Library,

368 articles were found in Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and PubMed. When search was narrowed

to peer-reviewed articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024, a total of 29 articles were

retrieved from these libraries. The narrowed search based on peer-reviewed articles published

between the year 2019 to the year 2024 yielded a total of 134 articles for all the search terms

used.

Quality Evaluation

The researcher was therefore left with 134 peer-reviewed articles that met the eligibility

criteria. However, this had to be narrowed down to a number that was easier to evaluate. Articles

excellent!

7

that did not factor in the issue of COVID19-pandemic were not considered for the evaluation.

This was a critical factor for evaluation because online psychotherapy was frequent during the

pandemic. A total of 78 articles out of the 134 articles did not meet this quality consideration.

The next factor considered was the subjects used in the study. The researcher considered articles

that used either counselors, patients, or individuals who experienced mental health challenges. 18

of the remaining 56 articles did not meet this requirement. Next the research considered the

outcomes of the studies which were either categorized in terms of experiences, effects, and

perceptions. 15 of the remaining 38 articles met this requirement. The researcher was therefore

left with 15 articles which were used in the review and evaluated in the attached box score.

The 15 selected articles applied research methodologies that were not narrative reviews.

For instance, Ierardi et at. (2022) assessed psychological problems that were experienced by

university students in a symptom checklist. A questionnaire was used to record their experiences

including life satisfaction after online counseling. Greenwood et al. (2022) relied on randomized

controlled trials that compared telehealth counseling to face-to-face counseling. Renn et al.

(2019) used online surveys to document patients’ choices on online versus in-person counseling.

Sockalingam et al. (2022) used telephone-based cognitive therapy to extract data, while Last et

al. (2024) used semi-structured interviews to collect data. Ncheka et al. (2024) equally used

semi-structured interviews to collect data.

Review of Literature

This section of the paper performs a review of the selected studies in accordance with the

study questions. The section has been broken into the below segments which directly conform

with the research questions. The review was narrowed down to a total of 15-peer reviewed

articles that met the selection and evaluation criteria.

start sentences with numbers spelled out

8

Online Therapy

Numerous studies have looked at the subject of online therapy. However, only those

studies that have compared online therapy to in-person counseling were considered for this study.

The studies considered in this research were those that could give the researcher information in

doing this comparison as well as answering other research questions. Online therapy was

mentioned by Greenwood et al. (2022) who in their study compared telehealth versus face-to-

face psychotherapy. Despite the fact that telehealth covers a wide range of health services that

can be offered through the internet, Greenwood et al. (2022) not only mentioned psychotherapy

as one of the telehealth services, but also focused their study on the comparison of psychotherapy

versus face-to-face counseling. The article was therefore found to be relevant and applicable to

the study. Greenwood conveys online psychotherapy as a new area that can help patients seek

mental health services. The researchers also attributed the increased use of this method of

psychotherapy to the COVID19 pandemic which made it difficult for both patients and

healthcare providers to interact face-to-face. Online therapy was also mentioned by Khan et al.

(2021) in their study that looked at the experiences of the counselors in online psychotherapy.

The study highlighted a number of factors that that affect counselors’ experience. Some of the

factors are therapeutic alliance, convenience, online counseling skills, ethical and legal concerns,

reaching out to diverse client base, client suitability for online psychotherapy, professional and

personal goals, and client satisfaction.

Whereas Khan et al. (2021) mentioned psychotherapy by focusing on counselor

experiences when providing this type of psychotherapy, Zeren et al. (2022) mentioned online

psychotherapy but focused on client experiences of online counselling. Zeren et al. (2022) took

cognizance of the fact that there are few studies that have investigated the experiences of the

9

clients in this type of counseling. Their study focused on two key themes which were associated

with client experiences. The themes were therapeutic alliance and patient experiences. Flexibility

of online counseling, limitations of online counseling, and improvement in the symptoms were

associated with patient satisfaction. On the other hand, therapeutic alliance was associated with

themes such as the bond between the counselor and the client, tasks, and goals. Zeren et al.

(2022) relied on semi-structured interviews to extract information from 6 client-participants.

Online therapy was also mentioned by Westerhof et al. (2019) who in their study looked at how

online therapy could be used to overcome depressive symptoms when it was led by the counselor

versus when it was supported by the peers. The results of the study established that counselor-led

online psychotherapy was more effective than peer supported counseling in terms of reducing

depressive symptoms.

Effectiveness of Online Therapy

Studies on online psychotherapy established that it was effective in helping patients

overcome depressive symptoms. For instance, Ierardi et al. (2022) established that online

psychotherapy was effective in helping patients reduce distresses such as anxiety, depression,

and obsessive and compulsive disorders. The study took a comparative approach and showed

that there were some differences in when online psychotherapy was compared to in-person

counseling in terms of effectiveness. Whereas online psychotherapy showed effectiveness in

managing psychological distresses in some subscales, in-person counselling was effective in

managing psychological distresses in all the subscales that were considered for the study. Sander

et al. (2021) conducted a study that looked into the effectiveness of online psychotherapy. The

study established that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients overcome mental

great job! Nice organization.

10

health disorders. However, the method could not be adapted to special needs patients with severe

mental illnesses.

Békés et al. (2021) conducted a study that investigated the effectiveness of online

psychotherapy. Even through the study also took a comparative approach, it established that

overtime online psychotherapy lost its effectiveness. Their study also raised concerns about

connectedness between the counselor and the patient. Schuster et al. (2020) looked at the pros

and cons of online psychotherapy and those of a blended model. The findings of the study

showed that a blended model was more effective than online psychotherapy. In-person

counseling was more effective compared to online psychotherapy in terms of creating personal

interactions between the counselor and the client. Sockalingam et al. (2022) in their study that

looked at the use of telephone-based psychotherapy for people with mental health distresses

established that the method was effective in treating psychological disorders in patients with

eating disorders. Xie et al. (2023) in their study established that there was short-term

improvement associated with remote dignity therapy. Patients who underwent the treatment

experienced reduction in dignity loss, gained more hope and meaning of life, and experienced

reductions in depression and anxiety.

Accessibility and Reach

Convenience is a key factor when it comes to the use of online psychotherapy in the

treatment of online psychological disorders. Renn et al. (2019) in their study that investigated the

factors associated with client preferences for digital psychotherapy in the treatment of depression

and anxiety found out that privacy, time commitment, location of services, and stigma were

among the factors that made patients to prefer online psychotherapy. In terms of location,

accessibility was considered a key factor in determining the use of online psychotherapy. The

of online therapy?? Please make it clear what you aer referencing.

11

study which also looked at how rural dwellers in America could benefit from online

psychotherapy found out that individuals in the rural areas with interconnection could benefit

from this model of psychological care due to accessibility. Ncheka et al. (2024) in their study that

looked at the implementation of cognitive-based psychotherapy in low mood showed that

internet-based psychotherapy was recommended for students from low-incoming settings due to

convenience and affordability. The study which relied on student population also revealed that

students or young people who were technologically savvy preferred online psychotherapy to in-

person counseling. Accessibility in terms of demographics was also confirmed in the studies

conducted by Ierardi et al. (2022) who showed that young individuals were more likely to

subscribe to the use of online psychotherapy in the treatment of depressive disorders as

compared to older adults.

Therapeutic Alliance and User Experience

Therapeutic alliance and user experience is another area that should be considered when

determining the use and effectiveness of online psychotherapy. Khan et al. (2021) in their study

found that therapeutic alliance is a key factor in determining user experience in online

psychotherapy. Even though the study lauded online psychotherapy in helping clients deal with

symptoms of psychological disorders, the study revealed that a strong therapeutic alliance or

personal interaction between a counselor and a client was necessary in improving client

experience. Therapeutic alliance and user experience was also mentioned by Zeren et al. (2022)

in their study that investigated client’s experiences of online counseling. The study also

considered patient satisfaction. The results of the study showed that tasks, bond, and goals were

the themes associated with therapeutic alliance while improvement in symptoms and flexibility

were associated with client satisfaction (Zeren et al., 2022). According to Zeren et al. (2022),

be sure to clarify whether you aer talking about online or in person since that is a big part - the comparison.

12

clients who used online psychotherapy, reported positive experiences in relation to online

counseling.

Key Findings

The review established that the experience of counselors was a key determinant in the

success of online counseling. This was evident in the studies conducted by Khan et al. (2021).

Their study also showed that therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction were associated with a

reduction in depressive symptoms, thus improving experiences of the users. Similar findings

were found out by Zeren et al. (2022). The review also showed that even though online

counseling was likely to be preferred with respect to convenience, cost effectiveness, and

accessibility, in-person or face-to-face counseling was favored by majority of the subjects in the

selected articles. The review explored the planning practices for public counseling therapists

(Khan et al., 2021).

In terms of effectiveness, Ierardi et al. (2022) established that online psychotherapy was

effective in helping patients reduce the effects of depressive symptoms such depression and

anxiety. In its comparative approach, the study showed that in-person counseling had the ability

to help clients overcome all the subscales of depressive disorders. Békés et al. (2021) in their

study also highlighted that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients deal with

depressive symptoms, however, the effectiveness of this model decreased overtime due to lack of

personal interaction between clients and counselors.

Schuster et al. (2020) in their study that looked at the pros and cons of both online

psychotherapy and blended models assert that blended models were more effective than internet-

based psychotherapy. Renn et al. (2019) in their study showed that clients were more likely to

use online psychotherapy for reasons such as accessibility, commitment to time, privacy,

13

affordability, and location of services. The findings were supported by Ncheka et al. (2024) who

showed that affordability and convenience were the key factors that made students from low-

income settings use online psychotherapy. Both Ncheka et al. (2024) and Ierardi et al. (2022)

mentioned the subject of demographics. The two studies revealed why young individuals were

more likely to use online psychotherapy instead of in-person counseling. Unlike older adults,

young individuals are technologically savvy and prefer to use online-psychotherapy due to cost

considerations (Ierardi et al., 2022).

Limitations

The results of this review were limited to several conditions. Defining the boundaries of

the present understanding of e-therapy's effect on mental health through recognition and

acknowledgment of these limitations is critical to build a basis for a transparent interpretation of

the findings and the further expansion and refinement of the research. The study was limited in

scope and therefore could not be generalized to other settings. The fact that the study only

focused on peer-reviewed articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024 during the

COVID-19 pandemic, remains a limiting factor that cannot be overlooked. The review was

confined to the three research questions.

Conclusion

The current review had the key aim of answering the research question as to whether

online or internet-based psychotherapy was more effective in handling mental health problems

compared to in-person counseling. The reviewed materials showed that most of the subjects in

the articles considered for review were likely to favor in-person counseling in terms of

effectiveness. However, online counseling was favored for reasons such as convenience and

great!

14

affordability. The study had several limitations and therefore cannot not be generalized to all

settings. One of the limitations was that the articles used in the review were published between

year 2019 to the year 2024. The practical implications are that counseling experts should

consider the conditions that may make a patient choose one counseling method in favor of the

other. Areas for future research are provided by limitations. Future studies should focus on

diverse articles from different library settings. Future studies should investigate issues such as

security in online psychotherapy, and patient privacy protection. In as much as online

psychotherapy comes with the benefits of convenience and cost savings, future studies should

focus on ethical issues associated with online psychotherapy.

15

References

Békés, V., Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Luo, X., Prout, T. A., & Hoffman, L. (2021). Psychotherapists’

challenges with online therapy during COVID-19: Concerns about connectedness predict

therapists’ negative view of online therapy and its perceived efficacy over time. Frontiers

in psychology, 12, 705699. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.705699

Greenwood, H., Krzyzaniak, N., Peiris, R., Clark, J., Scott, A. M., Cardona, M., ... & Glasziou,

P. (2022). Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health

conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR

Mental Health, 9(3), e31780. DOI: 10.2196/31780

Ierardi, E., Bottini, M., & Riva Crugnola, C. (2022). Effectiveness of an online versus face-to-

face psychodynamic counselling intervention for university students before and during

the COVID-19 period. BMC psychology, 10(1), 1-10. Retrieved from

https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-022-00742-7

Khan, S., Shapka, J. D., & Domene, J. F. (2021). Counsellors’ experiences of online therapy.

British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(1), 1–23.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1885009

Last, B. S., Mirhashem, R., & Yang, Y. (2024). From plan to practice: A qualitative study of

public mental health therapists’ session-planning practices. Psychological Services.

https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000840

Ncheka, J. M., Menon, J. A., E Bethan Davies, Paul, R., Mwaba, S. O. C., Mudenda, J.,

Wharrad, H., Tak, H., & Glazebrook, C. (2024). Implementing internet-based

cognitive behavioural therapy (moodgym) for African students with symptoms of low

16

mood during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative feasibilty study. BMC Psychiatry,

24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05542-4

Posselt, J., Baumann, E., & Dierks, M.-L. (2024). A qualitative interview study of patients’

attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on

prescription. Frontiers in Digital Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1275569

professionals. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 272(1), 107–

Renn, B. N., Hoeft, T. J., Lee, H. S., Bauer, A. M., & Areán, P. A. (2019). Preference for in-

person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of

adults in the US. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 6. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1

Sander, J., Bolinski, F., Diekmann, S., Gaebel, W., Günther, K., Hauth, I., Heinz, A., Kleiboer,

A., Riper, H., Trost, N., Vlijter, O., Zielasek, J., & Gerlinger, G. (2021). Online

therapy: an added value for inpatient routine care? Perspectives from mental health

care

professionals. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 272(1), 107–

118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01251-1

Schuster, R., Topooco, N., Keller, A., Radvogin, E., & Laireiter, A. R. (2020). Advantages and

disadvantages of online and blended therapy: Replication and extension of findings on

psychotherapists' appraisals. Internet Interventions, 21, 100326.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100326

Sockalingam, S., Leung, S. E., Ma, C., Hawa, R., Wnuk, S., Dash, S., Jackson, T., & Cassin, S.

E. (2022). The impact of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy on mental

17

health distress and disordered eating among bariatric surgery patients during COVID-

19: Preliminary results from a multisite randomized controlled trial. Obesity Surgery.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05981-6

Tuna, B., & Avci, O. H. (2023). Qualitative analysis of university counselors’ online

counseling experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04358-x

Westerhof, G. J., Lamers, S. M. A., Postel, M. G., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2019). Online

Therapy for Depressive Symptoms: An Evaluation of Counselor-Led and Peer-

Supported Life Review Therapy. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 135–146.

https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx140

Xie, M., Wang, C., Li, Z., Xu, W., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., & Hu, R. (2023). Effects of remote

dignity therapy on mental health among patients with hematologic neoplasms and their

significant others: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing

Studies, 104668–104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104668

Zeren, G., Erus, S. M., Amanvermez, Y., Genç, A. B., & Baki, D. U. Y. (2022). Client’s

Experiences of Online Counseling: Satisfaction and Therapeutic Alliance. Cukurova

University Faculty of Education Journal, 51(1), 634-658.

https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.843542