Asssigment
1
Exploring Transitional Care Models to Enhance Healthcare Outcomes for Elderly Patients
David Alexander Revilla
Florida National University
Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice
Professor: Carmen Lazo
December 7, 2024
2
Exploring Transitional Care Models to Enhance Healthcare Outcomes for Elderly Patients
Results Overview
The following section describes hypothetical results that the proposed Transitional Care
Model (TCM) intervention might produce in the set of chronic elder patients. Employing a pre-
post intervention design, the results indicate that the TCM is associated with decreased hospital
readmissions, improved patient satisfaction with the hospital experience, and overall enhanced
health stability in the months following discharge. We present a demographic profile of the
sample population, descriptive statistics illustrating the intervention's effects, and discussion of
study limitations.
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
Eighty participants (intervention: 40, control: 40) were purposively sampled from three
regional hospitals. The age of participants ranged from 60 to 89 years, with 36 participants aged
60–70 years (45%), 32 participants aged 71–80 years (40%) and 12 participants aged 81–89
years (15%). In terms of gender, 55% of the sample (n = 44) was male and 45% (n = 36) was
female. For chronic conditions, 40% (32 of the participants) had diabetes mellitus, 35% (28 of
the participants) had congestive heart failure (CHF), and 25% (20 of the participants) had
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On subjects-education, 65% (52 subjects) had a
high school education or lower, and 35% (28 subjects) had a college education or higher
(Hoogland et al., 2020).
3
More specifically, at baseline, 65% (62–68) of participants reported at least one hospital
readmission in the preceding year, with an average of 2.4 readmissions per patient. In addition,
three quarters of the participants reported that adhering to prescribed medication regimens was a
difficult challenge that they had to meet to maintain their health. Just 30% of the cohort felt
confident to manage their condition on their own, representing an important gap in self-
management capabilities. These baseline characteristics highlight the high risk of this population
and the possible effect of exposing an intervention, such as a Transitional Care Model (TCM),
designed to reduce risk factors (Tomlinson et al., 2020).
Statistical Outcomes
1. Decrease in Hospital Readmissions: The intervention group had significantly lower
hospital readmission rates than the control group. Results: A paired t-test showed the
following:
• Mean readmissions (control group): 2.1 ± 0.7
• Mean readmissions (intervention group): 0.8 ± 0.4
• t (39) = -7.35, p < 0.001
2. Improved Patient Satisfaction: Patient satisfaction reported based on a 5-point Likert
scale showed significant improvement in the intervention group. Scores before and after
intervention were:
• Mean satisfaction pre-intervention: 2.8 ± 0.5
• Mean post-intervention satisfaction score: 4.6 ± 0.3
4
• t (39) = 12.48, p < 0.001
3. Medication Adherence: The intervention group reported significantly improved
medication adherence. Chi-square analysis revealed:
• Adherence (intervention group): 80%
• Adherence (control group): 45%
• χ²(1, N=80) = 16.82, p < 0.001
4. Improvements in Functional Status: Self-care and mobility index was used to assess
functional status improvements. ANOVA revealed significant differences:
• Mean improvement score of intervention group: 3.2 ± 0.6
• Control group estimated improvement score: 1.1 ± 0.5
• F (1,78) = 24.67, p < 0.001
Research Limitations
There were several limitations to this study that may affect interpretation and
generalizability of results. First, the sample size, while adequate to draw initial conclusions, was
small and consisted of only 80 individuals. A larger and more varied cohort would add to the
generalizability of the findings and give more robust statistical power. Recruiting a more diverse
participant pool in future studies may alleviate this limitation and contribute generalizable
findings (Morkisch et al., 2020).
Second, outcomes were only tracked for 90 days after discharge. Though this period
yielded meaningful short-term insights, it failed to account for the longer-term effects of the
5
Transitional Care Model (TCM) intervention on health outcomes. Longer follow-up periods in
future studies would provide further insight into the long-term effectiveness of TCM
interventions (Costa Jacobsohn et al., 2023).
Third, the study's end-point measures were mostly derived from self-reported data on
patient satisfaction and medication adherence. This methodology creates the potential for
response bias if participants overestimate either their adherence or satisfaction. Integrating
objective measures (i.e., electronic monitoring systems to gauge adherence to treatment) not only
reduces this bias but can also enhance data reliability (Tomlinson et al., 2020).
Lastly, there may have been geographic and cultural restrictions since participants were
limited to one geographic region. This narrow focus limits the generalizability of findings to
other settings with different cultural, socioeconomic or healthcare delivery systems. Future
studies need to try to encompass participants from more diverse regions and cultures to enhance
the generalizability of the findings. Highlighting these limitations will support further research to
strengthen the evidence base for TCM interventions and programmatic applicability in a variety
of healthcare settings.
Suggestions for Future Research
To solidify the evidence for the Transitional Care Model (TCM) and diversify the patient
population in this body of literature we recommend following as future directions of research:
• Stretch out Sample Size and Diverseness: Future research should try to recruit a larger
sample size so that the results can carry statistical power and generalizability. The
participants need to be recruited from diverse ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic
6
backgrounds to determine the effectiveness of the intervention for different populations
and to notice any disparities between different groups in the outcomes (Leithaus et al.,
2022).
• Extend Follow-Up Duration: The research should extend the follow-up period used in
this study beyond 90 days. Extended follow-up periods will shed light on the long-term
consequences of TCM interventions on health outcomes, such as readmission prevalence,
medication compliance, and functional steadiness longitudinally (Costa Jacobsohn et al.,
2023).
• Use Objective Measures: Incorporating objective measures can strengthen data. Future
studies should implement the use of electronic medication monitoring systems to validate
self-reported data around medication adherence and patient behaviors. These initiatives
will mitigate response bias and provide more accurate evaluations of intervention impacts
(Leithaus et al., 2022).
• Examine Cost-Effectiveness: Understanding the cost-effectiveness of TCM interventions
is essential for assessing their economic viability and potential for broader
implementation. Future studies should evaluate if hospital readmissions are reduced, and
patient outcomes are improved such that the cost of implementation of TCM strategies is
justified.
Conclusion
Hypothetical study results suggest the TCM may significantly improve outcomes for
elderly patients with chronic conditions. Key findings are a significant decrease in hospital
readmissions, greater patient satisfaction, improved adherence to medications, and enhanced
7
functional status in participants receiving the intervention. These results highlight the importance
of applying TCM interventions to common discordant transitions of care experiences,
particularly in vulnerable populations.
Although the results highlight the potential of TCM to enhance health outcomes and
decrease healthcare expenses, several limitations must be resolved to corroborate and optimize
these discoveries in larger, real-world settings. Increasing sample sizes, extending follow-up
times, using objective data collection methods and broadening geographic and cultural diversity
are vital next steps for future research. These initiatives will secure greater evidence behind
TCM interventions, making them more adaptable and applicable across varied healthcare
settings. Long-term outcomes in elderly patients are improved through patient-centered,
evidence-based practices demonstrated in transitional care, and this study highlights the
significance of those practices to achieve improved patient-centered outcomes.
8
References
Costa Jacobsohn, G., Maru, A. P., Green, R. K., Gifford, A. N., Lukasik, M. D., Bandara, T.,
Caprio, T. V., Cochran, A. L., Cushman, J. T., Jones, C. M. C., Kind, A. J. H., Lohmeier,
M., & Shah, M. N. (2023). Multimethod Process Evaluation of a Community Paramedic
Delivered Care Transitions Intervention for Older Emergency Department
Patients. Prehospital emergency care, 27(7), 841–850.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2022.2094514
Hoogland, A. I., Mansfield, J., Lafranchise, E. A., Bulls, H. W., Johnstone, P. A., & Jim, H. S.
(2020). eHealth literacy in older adults with cancer. Journal of geriatric oncology, 11(6),
1020-1022.
Leithaus, M., Beaulen, A., de Vries, E., Goderis, G., Flamaing, J., Verbeek, H., & Deschodt, M.
(2022). Integrated Care Components in Transitional Care Models from Hospital to Home
for Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review. International journal of integrated
care, 22(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6447
Morkisch, N., Upegui-Arango, L. D., Cardona, M. I., van den Heuvel, D., Rimmele, M., Sieber,
C. C., & Freiberger, E. (2020). Components of the transitional care model (TCM) to
reduce readmission in geriatric patients: a systematic review. BMC geriatrics, 20(1), 345.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01747-w
Tomlinson, J., Cheong, V. L., Fylan, B., Silcock, J., Smith, H., Karban, K., & Blenkinsopp, A.
(2020). Successful care transitions for older people: a systematic review and meta-
9
analysis of the effects of interventions that support medication continuity. Age and
ageing, 49(4), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa002