| Assignment : NRSG615-U3IP- Task 2_Meaningful Use |
| Level of Achievement | | Exemplary - exceeds expectations | Proficient - meets expectations | Fair - needs improvement | Poor - does not meet expectations | Score: |
| Total points possible: | 175 | 90-100% | 80-89% | 73-79% | 72 or less% |
| Criteria | percent of score |
| Provide an introduction to include where you believe nursing informatics will be in five years supported by experiences from your practice background. (Max 35 points) | 20% | Introduction clearly describes the student's beliefs regarding informatics within the next five years supported by background experiences. (31-35 points) | Is lacking clarity in describing beliefs on the future of informatics within the next five years yet is supported by background experiences. (28-30 points) | Is lacking clarity in describing beliefs on the future of informatics within the next five years and does not support these thoughts using background experiences. (25-27 points) | Does not describe beliefs on the future of informatics and does not include support thoughts from background experiences. (24 or less points) |
| Identify the main tenets of Meaningful Use Guidelines affecting electronic documentation processes in your practice setting. (Max 35 points) | 20% | Clearly describes how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting, including at least two peer reviewed resources within the last 5 years as evidence to support this description. (31-35 points) | Discusses Meaningful Use yet lacking the detail to reflect how the guidelines affect electronic documentation processes in your practice setting. (28-30 points) | Minimal discussion of Meaningful Use and how the guidelines affect electronic documentation in your practice setting. (25-27 points) | Does not discuss how Meaningful Use Guidelines affect electronic documentation in your practice setting. (24 or less points) |
| Describe how Meaningful Use is taking place in your practice setting (current phase). Include at least two resources as evidence to support your statements. (Must be from a peer reviewed reference published within the last five years). (Max 78.75 points) | 45% | Clearly describes how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting, including at least two peer reviewed resources within the last 5 years as evidence to support this description. (70-78.75 points) | Description of how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting is lacking structure and clarity, yet two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years were included to support the description. (63-69 points) | Description of how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting is acceptable, yet two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years are not included to support the discussion. (57-62 points) | Presents neither a description of Meaningful Use application to your practice setting nor are two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years are included. (56 or less points) |
| Spelling, Grammar, APA format; 3-5 pages, not including title page and reference page. (Max 26.25 points) | 15% | No spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 2 errors in APA formatting. (23-26.25 points) | 1-2 spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 4 errors in APA formatting. (21-22 points) | 4-5 spelling or grammatical errors. 4-6 errors in APA formatting. (19-20 points) | More than 5 spelling or grammatical errors. More than 6 errors in APA formatting. (18 or less points) |
| | 100% | | | | Total score: | 0 |
newtonv
NRSG615_U3_IP.xlsx
