Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
Rough Draft - Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal -
Rubric
Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay
5. Target 12.6 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is detailed.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is present.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is
incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is omitted.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
PICOT Question 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received
from instructor
5. Target 12.6 points
Statement of updated PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and uses the
templated language.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received
from instructor is accurately written and uses the templated language.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received
from instructor is present with minor inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received
from instructor is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received
from instructor is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Method of Studies 25.2 points
Criteria Description
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question
5. Target 25.2 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question is thorough and demonstrates a solid understanding
of research methods.
4. Acceptable 22.43 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question is detailed and demonstrates a basic understanding
of research methods.
3. Approaching 19.91 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question is present.
2. Insufficient 18.9 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the
associated research question is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Results of Studies 25.2 points
Criteria Description
Summary of the key findings of the four studies
5. Target 25.2 points
Summary of the key findings of the four studies is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 22.43 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is complete with some minor
inconsistencies.
3. Approaching 19.91 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is present with some
inconsistencies.
2. Insufficient 18.9 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question
5. Target 12.6 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is thorough and accurate
with substantial relevant details.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is complete with some
minor inconsistencies and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is present with some
inconsistencies.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is incomplete or
inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome
5. Target 12.6 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is
thorough accurate.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is
complete with some minor inconsistencies.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is
present with some inconsistencies.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is
incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is
omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT
Question 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem
5. Target 12.6 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem is thorough, and accurate.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem is present with some inconsistencies.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the
identified nursing problem is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for
identified setting
5. Target 12.6 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care
for identified setting is thorough with substantial relevant details.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care
for identified setting is complete and includes relevant details.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care
for identified setting is present with some inconsistencies.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care
for identified setting is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care
for identified setting is omitted.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 12.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little
awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate
audience is evident.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 12.6 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target 12.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable 11.21 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
3. Approaching 9.95 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient 9.45 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence 10.8 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 10.8 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are
clearly considered.
4. Acceptable 9.61 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching 8.53 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient 8.1 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of the writer.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 10.8 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 10.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 9.61 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 8.53 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 8.1 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 7.2 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 7.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 6.41 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 5.69 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 5.4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 180 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.