Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

profilebutterflyl
NRS-445Rubric-RoughDraft-ResearchCritiquesandEvidence-BasedPracticeProposal.pdf

Rough Draft - Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal -

Rubric

Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay

5. Target 12.6 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is detailed.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is present.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is

incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is omitted.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

PICOT Question 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received

from instructor

5. Target 12.6 points

Statement of updated PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and uses the

templated language.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received

from instructor is accurately written and uses the templated language.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received

from instructor is present with minor inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received

from instructor is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received

from instructor is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Method of Studies 25.2 points

Criteria Description

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question

5. Target 25.2 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question is thorough and demonstrates a solid understanding

of research methods.

4. Acceptable 22.43 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question is detailed and demonstrates a basic understanding

of research methods.

3. Approaching 19.91 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question is present.

2. Insufficient 18.9 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the

associated research question is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Results of Studies 25.2 points

Criteria Description

Summary of the key findings of the four studies

5. Target 25.2 points

Summary of the key findings of the four studies is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 22.43 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is complete with some minor

inconsistencies.

3. Approaching 19.91 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is present with some

inconsistencies.

2. Insufficient 18.9 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question

5. Target 12.6 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is thorough and accurate

with substantial relevant details.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is complete with some

minor inconsistencies and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is present with some

inconsistencies.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is incomplete or

inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome

5. Target 12.6 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is

thorough accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is

complete with some minor inconsistencies.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is

present with some inconsistencies.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is

incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is

omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT

Question 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem

5. Target 12.6 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem is thorough, and accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem is complete with some minor inconsistencies.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem is present with some inconsistencies.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the

identified nursing problem is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for

identified setting

5. Target 12.6 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care

for identified setting is thorough with substantial relevant details.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care

for identified setting is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care

for identified setting is present with some inconsistencies.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care

for identified setting is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care

for identified setting is omitted.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 12.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 12.6 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 12.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 11.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 9.95 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 9.45 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Evidence 10.8 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 10.8 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 9.61 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 8.53 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 8.1 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 10.8 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 10.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 9.61 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 8.53 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 8.1 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 7.2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 7.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 6.41 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 5.69 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 5.4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 180 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.