Urgent

Geriatric Care Plan Concept Map & Presentation Course: Su26 ADNG 1200 50-51 Clinical I

Cri- ter ia

Level 5 9–10 points

Level 4 7–8 points

Level 3 5–6 points

Level 2 3–4 points

Level 1 0–2 points

Criterion Score

Cri-

teri-

o

n

1

/ 10Success-

fully uti-

lizes data

from re-

sources to

create a

geriatric

care plan

concept

map that

illustrates

connec-

tions be-

tween

nursing

diagnosis

and all 12

of the fol-

lowing

elements

of map:

· 3-part

nursing

Utilizes

data from

resources

to create

a concept

map that

illustrates

connec-

tion be-

tween

nursing

diagnosis

and data

from 11

of the fol-

lowing. Or

addresses

all but

missing

data with-

in some

elements:

· 3-part

Utilizes

data from

resources

to create

a concept

map that

illustrates

connec-

tion be-

tween

nursing

diagnosis

with some

error. In-

cludes

data from

10 of the

following.

Or ad-

dresses all

but miss-

ing data

within

Does not

utilize evi-

dence-

based

data to

create

concept

map.

Presents

informa-

tion on

fewer

than 10 of

the fol-

lowing or

presents

data on

several

but at su-

perficial

and/or

inaccurate

level:

Rudi-

mentary

concept

map. No

credible

evi-

dence-

based

material

provided.

Many

required

elements

are miss-

ing or

insuffi-

ciently or

inaccu-

rately

ad-

dressed.

https://ntcmn.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_…_files.d2l?db=15394605&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7619362 5/21/26, 6:43 PM Page 1 of 5

diagnosis

· Medical

diagnoses

(2)

· Risk Fac-

tors (3)

· Compli-

cations (3)

· Assess-

ment

Data (3)

·

Labs/tests

(2)

· Goal

with mea-

surable

time

frame

· Nursing

process-

at least

three rel-

evant in-

terven-

tions (3)

· Discus-

sion of

rationale

for each

nursing

diagnosis

· Medical

diagnoses

(2)

· Risk Fac-

tors (3)

· Compli-

cations (3)

· Assess-

ment

Data (3)

·

Labs/tests

(2)

· Goal

with mea-

surable

time

frame

· Nursing

process-

at least

three rel-

evant in-

terven-

tions (3)

· Discus-

sion of

rationale

some ele-

ments:

· 3-part

nursing

diagnosis

· Medical

diagnoses

(2)

· Risk Fac-

tors (3)

· Compli-

cations (3)

· Assess-

ment

Data (3)

·

Labs/tests

(2)

· Goal

with mea-

surable

time

frame

· Nursing

process-

at least

three rel-

evant in-

terven-

tions (3)

· 3-part

nursing

diagnosis

· Medical

diagnoses

(2)

· Risk Fac-

tors (3)

· Compli-

cations (3)

· Assess-

ment

Data (3)

·

Labs/tests

(2)

· Goal

with mea-

surable

time

frame

· Nursing

process-

at least

three rel-

evant in-

terven-

tions (3)

· Discus-

sion of

https://ntcmn.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_…_files.d2l?db=15394605&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7619362 5/21/26, 6:43 PM Page 2 of 5

Cri-

teri-

o

n

2

/ 10

interven-

tion with

citations

(3)

· Patient

Education

(3)

· Chal-

lenges (3)

· Learn-

ing/Sur-

prises (2)

for each

interven-

tion with

citations

(3)

· Patient

Education

(3)

· Chal-

lenges (3)

· Learn-

ing/Sur-

prises (2)

· Discus-

sion of

rationale

for each

interven-

tion with

citations

(3)

· Patient

Education

(3)

· Chal-

lenges (3)

· Learn-

ing/Sur-

prises (2)

rationale

for each

interven-

tion with

citations

(3)

· Patient

Education

(3)

· Chal-

lenges (3)

· Learn-

ing/Sur-

prises (2)

· Profes-

sionally

presents

current,

evidence-

based,

credible

informa-

tion from

resources

on nurs-

ing diag-

nosis to

clinical

group us-

ing the

concept

· Presents

current,

evidence-

based in-

formation

from re-

sources

on nurs-

ing diag-

nosis to

clinical

group us-

ing the

concept

map to

illustrate

most, but

· Utilizes

the con-

cept map

to present

evidence-

based in-

formation

on the

nursing

diagnosis

but miss-

es at least

two of the

required

elements

of the

concept

· Presents

informa-

tion on

the nurs-

ing diag-

nosis but

addresses

only a few

of the re-

quired

elements

of the

concept

map

· Minimal

evidence

· Unable

to pro-

fession-

ally

present

informa-

tion on

nursing

diagnosis

in a co-

herent,

meaning-

ful man-

ner

· Credible

evidence

https://ntcmn.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_…_files.d2l?db=15394605&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7619362 5/21/26, 6:43 PM Page 3 of 5

Total / 20

map to

illustrate

all key

elements

· Shares

minimum

of two

signifi-

cant/ sur-

prising

findings

with clini-

cal group

and dis-

cusses

signifi-

cance of

each

· Uses

profes-

sional

communi-

cation

skills to

answer

questions

not all

elements

· Shares

two sig-

nifi-

cant/sur-

prising

findings

with clini-

cal group

but with

shallow

discus-

sion/ min-

imal infor-

mation

· Uses

profes-

sional

communi-

cation

skills to

answer

questions

map

· Informa-

tion on

map does

not con-

sistently

support

nursing

diagnosis

· Shares

one sig-

nifi-

cant/sur-

prising

finding

with clini-

cal group

but with

shallow

discus-

sion/ min-

imal infor-

mation

· Answers

questions

with some

difficulty

is present

· Informa-

tion on

map does

not con-

sistently

support

nursing

diagnosis

· Shares

one sig-

nifi-

cant/sur-

prising

finding

with clini-

cal group

without

discussion

· Answers

questions

with great

difficulty

is absent

· Infor-

mation

on map

does not

support

nursing

diagnosis

· Unable

to identi-

fy/share

a signifi-

cant or

surpris-

ing find-

ing from

concept

map

project

· Unable

to an-

swer

ques-

tions

https://ntcmn.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_…_files.d2l?db=15394605&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7619362 5/21/26, 6:43 PM Page 4 of 5

Overall Score

Level 4 11 points minimum

Level 3 8 points minimum

Level 2 5 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

https://ntcmn.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_…_files.d2l?db=15394605&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7619362 5/21/26, 6:43 PM Page 5 of 5