response the questions
CHAPTER 13:
Assessment Accommodations & Grading Students in the Classroom
Assessment in Special Education
Raymond H. Witte
Jane E. Bogan
Michael F. Woodin
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Accommodations vs. Modifications
Accommodations: changes in assessment administration that maintain the validity of the assessment while permitting students with exceptionalities to demonstrate their knowledge.
- They do not change or alter the expected level of performance
Modifications: change the material being presented or the expectations of what the student will do
If a student with exceptionalities is participating in the same assessment as his/her typically developing peers, the student is generally allowed to have accommodations but not modifications.
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Categories of Accommodations
Presentation: change how the material is presented to the student
Time: change how time is used within the scope of the assessment
Setting: change the location and environment of the test administration
Response: change how the student demonstrates his/her knowledge
Aid: include the use of electronic and manual devices such as item overlays, graph paper, etc.
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Choosing & Applying Accommodations
Dynamic Assessment of Test Accommodations is a tool designed to help teachers identify accommodations that are effective for individual students
Students who have accommodations specified on their IEPS must be permitted access to those accommodations by mandate of IDEIA.
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Role of Grading & Evaluation
Purposes of grading:
- Documentation of academic performance
- Issuing credit for courses passed
- Grade advancement
Grading: the formal evaluation of student work, which involves determining the value and quality of that work based on some set of standards or performance criteria
Evaluation: involves the actual process of judging and determining the quality of work of a student
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Grading: Current Status
Functions of grading system:
- Provides an official record of classroom performance & learning attainment for all students over a specified time period
- Provides clear indication of academic performance & accomplishment to a student or any other interested party
- Provides a current indication of a child’s relative progress and/or competency and/or goals
Grades provide a general sense of performance
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Making the Grade
The evaluation measures completed by the student will constitute the evidence that is used to determine the grade
Grading should involve a carefully reviewed process of determining the best measures of achievement and student learning so that the grade that is earned truly reflects the student’s accomplishments.
Major grading categories:
- Product: collecting work produced by the student that is directly connected to his/her learning accomplishments
- Process: focus on production processes needed to complete school products & performances
- Progress: focus on the amount and/or magnitude of a student’s learning that occurs in a specified amount of time
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Grading Models
Norm-referenced: compares a student’s individual performance to that of a specific group
Criterion-referenced grading: relates each student’s performance to identified and pre-determined academic levels or standards
Aptitude comparison: individualized grading approach where each student serves as his/her own comparison model
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Grading Approaches
Same approach for all students: can work for students with special learning needs who have the grade-level academic skills (& intervention support resources) necessary to complete the required work requirements in that educational setting
Effort-based: difficult due to subjective nature
Progress-based: must ensure that the students understand how progress is defined & what academic behaviors/outcomes they are working on
Adapted: changes to actual criteria, including additional information for the grade, or other options
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Inclusive Grading Model
Establish clear standards for student learning
For each standard, determine if it needs to be adapted for the student
If adaptation is needed, determine if the adaptation requires accommodation or modification
If modification is required, develop appropriate modified standard
Assign grade or mark based on modified standard & note on report card which standards have been modified
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Grading as a Professional Practice
Make sure grades provide meaningful learning performance information and feedback to those who are most important to you
Make sure students are familiar with the grading process that is used in your class
Using an inclusive grading system provides a detailed and comprehensive picture of each student and his/her accomplishments & learning skills
Grading practices must be connected to assessments that are aligned with desired learning outcomes & standards in the provided lesson
Witte, Bogan, Woodin, Assessment in Special Education. © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1-*
Grading as a Professional Practice
Grading & evaluation is about feedback and communication.
The public expects teachers to be highly competent in all phases of teaching, and that includes grading.
Make sure the grading process is part of an ongoing professional dialogue at all service levels.
Make sure to share & discuss your grading practices & concerns.