epidemiology

profileBeautygirl
criteriaformodule3.docx

Due Date

Submit your completed application by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 3 as directed.

Requirements

1. The Descriptive Study Paper is worth 50 points and will be graded on use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.

2. Create your exercise using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office), which is the required format for all Chamberlain University documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in .docx.

3. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your assignment may be posted under the Q & A Forum.

4. The length of the exercise is to be no less than three pages and no greater than five pages, excluding title page and reference pages.

5. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):

Note: Introduction—Write an introduction but do not use "Introduction" as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.

Preparing Your Descriptive Study Paper

For the purpose of this exercise:

Write a one- to two-page summary answering the following questions:

· What is meant by the term health disparities?

· What do you think could be done about health disparity from the societal and public health points of view?

· The prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

In a one- to two-page paper, propose a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for this phenomenon.

Post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.

Rubric

Descriptive Study Paper Grading Rubric

Descriptive Study Paper Grading Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction:

Introduces the purpose of the exercise—to gain an understanding of various concepts of epidemiology.

3.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Short introduction related to the purpose of the paper.

2.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Partially addresses the purpose of the paper.

1.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal introduction of the purpose of the paper.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No introduction of the purpose of the paper.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Health Disparity:

Assesses what health disparities are.

9.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent assessment of what health disparities are.

7.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Partial assessment of what health disparities are.

6.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal assessment of what health disparities are.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No assessment of what health disparities are.

9.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Points of View:

Speculates as to what could be done about health disparities from the societal and public health points of view.

9.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent speculation as to what could be done about health disparities from the societal and public health points of view.

7.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Partial speculation as to what could be done about health disparities from the societal and public health points of view.

6.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal speculation as to what could be done about health disparities from the societal and public health points of view.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No speculation as to what could be done about health disparities from the societal and public health points of view.

9.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Descriptive Epidemiology:

Infers why the prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

6.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent inference why the prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

5.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Partial inference why the prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

4.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal inference why the prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No inference why the prevalence of hypertension has remained essentially unchanged for nearly a decade.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Descriptive Epidemiology Study Recommendation

Proposes a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for the prevalence of the hypertension phenomenon.

12.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent selection of a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for the prevalence of the hypertension phenomenon

10.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Partial selection of a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for the prevalence of the hypertension phenomenon

9.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal selection of a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for the prevalence of the hypertension phenomenon

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No selection of a descriptive epidemiologic study to explore the reasons for the prevalence of the hypertension phenomenon

12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary:

Provides a summation of thoughts and understanding of various concepts of epidemiology.

3.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent summation of the various concepts of epidemiology

2.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Brief summation of the various concepts of epidemiology

1.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Minimal summation of the various concepts of epidemiology

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No summation of the various concepts of epidemiology

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity of Writing:

Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.

5.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought; no spelling or grammar errors; well organized with proper flow of meaning

4.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language; no more than three spelling or grammar errors; well-organized thoughts and concepts

3.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

Language needs development. Four spelling and/or grammar errors; poorly organized thoughts and concepts

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

Language needs development. Five or more spelling and/or grammar errors; fails to have organized thoughts and concepts

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format:

All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA format. 1.Document setup 2.Title and reference pages Citations in the text and references

3.0 pts

Meets All Criteria

APA format correct with no errors

2.0 pts

Meets Most Criteria

One to two minor errors in APA format OR one or two citations are missing

1.0 pts

Partially Meets Criteria

APA formatting contains multiple errors (three or more) and/or several citations are missing

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

APA formatting not present and citations are not included

3.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0