Healthcare project

BSN 325 Hallmark Community Project: PowerPoint Presentation 2026-3

Criteria Exemplary Approaching Developing Does Not Meet Expectations Community Identification, Information, Demographics, and Social Data Maximum: 15 pts

The submission includes a clearly identified community of residence and identifies all the required data on community info, social data and demographics. 15 pts

The submission includes an identified community of residence and identifies 2 out of 3 of the required data for community info, social data and demographics. 10 pts

The submission includes an identified community of residence and identifies 1 out of 3 required data on community info, social data and demographics. 5 pts

No community of residence is identified OR missing the required data on community info, social data and demographics. 0 pts

Top 3 Chronic Diseases Identified Maximum: 10 pts

The submission clearly identifies the top 3 chronic diseases, and each is supported by strong community-specific statistical evidence. 10 pts

The submission includes 3 diseases with minimal or unclear statistical data. 7 pts

The submission includes 3 or less diseases with incorrect or no statistical data. 4 pts

The submission identifies no diseases and provides no supporting evidence. 0 pts

Top 3 Infectious Diseases Maximum: 10 pts

The submission clearly identifies the top 3 infectious diseases, and each is supported by strong community-specific statistical evidence. 10 pts

The submission includes 3 diseases with minimal or unclear statistical data. 7 pts

The submission includes 3 or less diseases with incorrect or no statistical data. 4 pts

The submission identifies no diseases and provides no supporting evidence. 0 pts

Healthy People 2030 Goals Maximum: 10 pts

The submission identifies 6 total Healthy People 2030 Goals for top 3 Chronic and top 3 Infectious diseases, and each is appropriately aligned, accurate, and clearly stated for each condition. 10 pts

The submission identifies 4-5 Healthy People 2030 Goals for top 3 Chronic and top 3 Infectious diseases, and each is appropriately aligned, accurate, and clearly stated for each condition OR 6 objectives are provided, but 1-2 are vague or unaligned. 7 pts

The submission identifies 2-3 Healthy People 2030 Goals for top 3 Chronic and top 3 Infectious diseases, and each is appropriately aligned, accurate, and clearly stated for each condition OR more than 3 objectives provided are vague or unaligned. 4 pts

No goals or unaligned goals are provided. 0 pts

Top 3 Risk Factors Maximum: 10 pts

The submission clearly identifies the top 3 risk factors, and each is supported by strong community- specific statistical evidence. 10 pts

The submission includes 3 risk factors with minimal or unclear statistical data. 7 pts

The submission includes 3 or less risk factors with incorrect or no statistical data. 4 pts

The submission identifies no risk factors and provides no supporting evidence. 0 pts

Priority Community Concern Maximum: 5 pts

The submission includes a single priority health concern that is logically selected and based on comprehensive analysis of earlier data. 5 pts

The submission includes a single priority health concern with some reasoning provided but might lack connection to data. 4 pts

The submission includes a priority health concern that lacks connection to data OR the submission includes more than one priority community concern. 2 pts

Priority concern is missing. 0 pts

SMART Objectives (3) Maximum: 10 pts

The submission includes SMART goals that are: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. 10 pts

The submission includes SMART goals that are either Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound, but not all five attributes of the SMART goal. 7 pts

The submission includes SMART goals that have elements missing or are unclear. 4 pts

Objectives missing or not SMART-formatted. 0 pts

Two Topics per Objective Maximum: 5 pts

The submission includes two topics per objective that are meaningfully aligned and well- developed for community education. 5 pts

The submission includes less than two topics per objective that are aligned; but not meaningfully aligned, or they are not well- developed for community education. 4 pts

The submission includes less than two topics per objective that are incomplete or loosely related topics provided. 2 pts

Topics or objectives are missing. 0 pts

Educational, Strategy, Delivery, and Evaluation Method Maximum: 10 pts

The submission includes an educational, delivery, and evaluation strategy that is appropriate for the population. 10 pts

The submission includes an educational, delivery, and evaluation strategy that is only basic or is not fully developed for the population OR 1 of these 3 components are missing. 7 pts

The submission includes an educational, delivery, and evaluation strategy that is confusing OR 2 of these 3 components are missing. 4 pts

The submission is missing an educational strategy, a delivery method and an evaluation method. 0 pts

Disaster Selection Maximum: 5 pts

The submission includes a disaster selection that is realistic and relevant to the chosen community. 5 pts

The submission includes a disaster selection that is either not realistic or not relevant to the chosen community. 4 pts

The submission includes a disaster selection but does not include a connection to the community OR more than 1 disaster is provided. 2 pts

No disaster selected. 0 pts

Criteria Exemplary Approaching Developing Does Not Meet Expectations Emergency Resources Identified Maximum: 5 pts

The submission identifies emergency resources in a thorough and accurate list of local, regional, or federal

resources. 5 pts

The submission partially identifies emergency resources, but is missing either local, regional, or federal resources.

4 pts

The submission identifies emergency resources that are unclear.

2 pts

No emergency resources listed. 0 pts

Vulnerable Populations (4) Maximum: 5 pts

The submission clearly identifies 4 vulnerable populations with an explanation of why each is at risk. 5 pts

The submission identifies less than 4 vulnerable populations and only partially explains why each is at risk or only explains why some vulnerable populations are at risk. 4 pts

The submission identifies only some vulnerable groups but without rationale. 2 pts

Missing or incorrectly identified populations. 0 pts

Potential Effects on (Infrastructure, Services; Emergency Services, and the General Population) Maximum: 5 pts

The submission identifies potential effects to infrastructure, emergency services and general population that are comprehensive with realistic impacts clearly detailed. 5 pts

The submission identifies potential effects to infrastructure, emergency services and general population that are partially explained. 4 pts

The submission is missing either the potential effects to infrastructure, emergency services OR general population. 2 pts

Effects not identified. 0 pts

Anticipated Health Issues

with Interventions Maximum: 10 pts

The submission includes 3 or

more anticipated health issues that apply to the disaster. Each health issue has 3-5 nursing interventions that are actionable, realistic interventions without EMS/hospital access. 10 pts

The submission includes 3 or

more anticipated health issues that apply to the disaster with less than 3 nursing interventions per health issue that are actionable, realistic interventions without EMS/hospital access. 7 pts

The submission includes less

than 3 anticipated health issues and/or less than 3 nursing interventions per health issue that may or may not be feasible without EMS/hospital access. 4 pts

No Health Issues AND No

interventions listed. 0 pts

Presenter Notes Maximum: 10 pts

The submission includes detailed, thorough presenter notes that demonstrate mastery of topic. Each slide's speaker notes meets the 75 word count. Word document present. 10 pts

The submission includes presenter notes that demonstrate an approaching mastery of the topic with most speaker notes meeting the 75 word count. Word document present. 7 pts

The submission includes presenter notes that lack depth, contain the wrong information, or demonstrate only a developing mastery of the topic. 75 words per speaker notes are not met. Word document missing. 4 pts

No presenter notes. 0 pts

APA Formatting, Spelling, and Grammar Maximum: 5 pts

The submission includes full and correct formatting of in-text citations, image citations, and reference page using APA 7th

ed., cites at least four (4) scholarly sources, AND no spelling and grammar errors. 5 pts

The submission includes formatting using APA 7th ed., and cites at least four (4) scholarly sources but there may

be minimal errors to the reference page, image citations, or in-text citations AND/OR 1-5 errors noted for spelling and grammar. 4 pts

The submission includes multiple APA formatting errors AND/OR multiple errors noted on grammar and spelling, or cites fewer than

four (4) scholarly sources. 2 pts

The presentation is not in APA format including the reference page, or fewer than four (4) scholarly sources — or none —

are cited. 0 pts

Slide Count, Design Maximum: 10 pts

The submission includes 15-20 slides with a title page, introduction, conclusion and reference slide. The slides are not overcrowded, have appropriate text size and contain appropriate images. 10 pts

The submission includes 15-20 slides but is missing either a title page, introduction, conclusion or reference page OR has 15-20 slides that have minimal to no visuals, poor text size, and/or are overcrowded. 7 pts

The presentation includes less than 15 content slides with a design that is inconsistent or incorrect, confusing, and/or the presentation is missing 1 or 2 of the following: Title page, introduction, conclusion and reference page. 4 pts

No slides provided. 0 pts

Audio Maximum: 10 pts

The presentation submitted has clear narration, is directed to a board of trustees, and demonstrates professionalism. 10 pts

The presentation submitted has narration, and mostly demonstrates professionalism, but is not directed to a board of trustees. 7 pts

The presentation submitted includes audio, but it is unclear or incomplete, or lacks professionalism. 4 pts

No audio recording. 0 pts

Total Possible Points: 150