Business Writer-Discussion Assignment Part 1

mcyrayvahgr

ArticleManagementofOrganizationalChangeProcessesU4D1.pdf

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Business Writer-Discussion Assignment Part 1

Find a copy

Abstract

Full Text

Back to previous page

document 1 of 1

Management of Organizational Change Processes

Ionescu, Vladimir-Codrin; Bolcas, Cristina. Manager; Bucharest Iss. 22, (2015): 86-93.

http://wv9lq5ld3p.search.serialssolutions.com.library.capella.edu?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ% 3Acentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=Manager&rft.atitle=Management+of+Organizational+Change+Processes&rft.au=Ionescu% 2C+Vladimir-Codrin%3BBolcas%2C+Cristina&rft.aulast=Ionescu&rft.aufirst=Vladimir-Codrin&rft.date=2015-07- 01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=86&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=Manager&rft.issn=14530503&rft_id=info:doi/

Contemporary organizations need to understand the meaning of change and to tackle it as a source for improving processes and activities, aiming at increasing the

performance and competitiveness. From this perspective, the paper presents approaches to organizational change and highlights the fundamental objectives which the

organizations set for themselves by designing and implementing organizational change programs. The conceptual framework of the change management is defined and

the stages of the change management process are presented. In the final part of the paper the problem of resistance to change is highlighted by explaining the content

of the stages that employees go through in the process of adapting to change within organizations.

Listen

Headnote

Abstract: Contemporary organizations need to understand the meaning of change and to tackle it as a source for improving processes and activities, aiming at increasing

the performance and competitiveness. From this perspective, the paper presents approaches to organizational change and highlights the fundamental objectives which

the organizations set for themselves by designing and implementing organizational change programs. The conceptual framework of the change management is defined

and the stages of the change management process are presented. In the final part of the paper the problem of resistance to change is highlighted by explaining the

content of the stages that employees go through in the process of adapting to change within organizations.

Key words: organizational change, change management, resistance to change, objectives, competitiveness.

JEL Classification: MIO, M12, L21.

1. Introduction

The vast and complex issues related to the organizational change and the change management processes within organizations is addressed in a significant number of

studies, surveys and articles published in the specialized literature [1,4,5]. The competition advantage and the competitive advantage are determined decisively by the

ability of managers and entrepreneurs to design and implement organizational change programs.

In this respect, it is essential that managers and entrepreneurs promote a proactive and flexible management, by means of which possible changes in the business

environment may be detected and timely and effective strategies may be adopted. Most organizations are reactive, meaning that they limit themselves merely to

reacting to the changes in the business environment.

In order to become sustainable, the organizations must show a proactive behavior in business and to turn to the so-called sliding planning, which involves revisions of

certain objectives, rethinking of strategic options, reallocation of resources, adjusting time limits, depending on contextual evolutions registered in the economic, social,

technological and managerial field.

In our view, organizations need to have well-grounded and functional strategies, policies and programs, with realistic targets, with resources allocated rationally and

effectively according to the principle of ranking strategic priorities, with deadlines established clearly, yet which may be subject to redefinitions, adjustments and

rearrangements depending on the opportunities that may arise in the business environment, new contexts, situations and rules requiring appropriate behaviors, attitudes

and managerial decisions at organizational level.

It is recommended that organizations evaluate periodically their internal potential, doubled by profound analysis of business environment, with special reference to

competition within activity frame. Thus, we consider necessary a major mutation to managers and entrepreneurs' mentality, meaning the understanding of the analysis

and evaluation importance, which complexity vary depending on the extent and specific of organization's activities [7].

2. About organizational change

Change represents the essence of business development. The approach of change has become a key element as far as competitive advantages are concerned, because

only by directing employees towards adopting rapid change, the organization can react to the market pressures before the context is modified [3].

It is important that organizations understand the meaning of change and tackle it as a source for improving processes and activities, so as to increase performance and

competitiveness. From this perspective, William Redington Hewlett, co-founder of the famous Hewlett-Packard, stated: "Above anything, consider change inevitable, do

not try to oppose it. Always be ready for a 180° turn when you discover a new and promising direction".

Page 1 of 5

10/26/2017https://search-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/printviewfile?accountid=27965

Organizational change may involve, for example, redefining the company's mission and, consequently, reconsidering strategic, functional, operational and individual

objectives. Thus, the redefinition of the mission means changes in the variables that define it, namely the activity profile, products and services provided, as well as the

customer segments toward which the organization is oriented. Therefore, the organization may propose itself to achieve in the future a new product, to provide a new

service that may bring competitive advantages by reference to its competitors, to enter a new market or to reposition itself within an existing market.

Redefining the mission in accordance with the changes in the business environment is a projection of the managers' strategic vision on future activity.

The opportunity to redefine the mission of the organization is determined by the ability of managers to notify mutations occurring in the environment.

Organizational change may also involve the introduction of a new manufacturing or information technology having as its effect the improvement of the processes within

the organization and, implicitly, the results of these processes (products and services), improving the performance evaluation system, redesigning the organizational

structure (reconfigurations jobs and positions, development of certain departments and reduction of others, redefining organizational relationships, etc.), and the

operationalization of managerial systems and methods such as management by objectives, project management, total quality management etc.

In our view, organizational change includes a series of activities in which the organization is prepared to acquire the skills needed to implement a new managerial

strategy. Organizational change is, on the one hand, a complex process and, on the other hand, it is an important step in strategic planning, being preceded by the

diagnosis-analysis and followed by the preparation of the development strategy of the organization.

Professor Ion Verboncu finds that, largely, organizational change is the transformation of any kind, whether voluntary or involuntary, of the conditions that existed at one

time in a given environment. In a narrow sense, organizational change refers to any transformation in the structure, processes, inputs and outputs of an organization

[10].

Richard Newton considers that there are three main modalities to approach organizational change [9]:

*as a project;

*with an action committee;

*integrated within operational processes.

The first of these approaches requires a team of change which sets the budget, plans the change and assesses the results obtained further to the implementation of the

project.

Examples of changes achieved by project are: redesigning the information subsystem, developing a new product or service, implementing a new management system,

etc.

The change with an action committee is aimed at multifunctional improvements that do not require significant investments. Unlike a project, an action committee can be

permanent and can be assigned other tasks on a regular basis in order to achieve superior performance. An example of change achieved with the help of action

committees is the reduction of the number of complaints from customers.

The change integrated within operational processes envisages the continuous improvement of the performance registered by each employee of the organization. This

approach to change is closely related to the total quality management, which involves tracking down quality from the moment when the order is received from the client,

going through all the phases of the execution process up to the delivery of products, empowering each participant to achieve quality.

Regardless of the approach to change, the managerial team should analyze and monitor continuously and systematically the developments of the impact factors from the

environment, depending on which they redefine certain objectives of the organization.

The approach of an organizational change process is always subsumed to certain objectives such as:

* redesigning the organization's management system;

* reconfiguring components of the organizational structure (jobs, positions, organizational relationships);

* redesigning the organization's decision-making subsystem;

* increased computerization;

* developing new products and services;

* introducing modern (manufacturing or information) technologies which are sources of competitive advantage;

* reshaping elements of organizational culture;

* implementing a new development strategy;

* drawing up a business partnership with another organization.

3. Change management process approach

Change management is the name given to a set of processes, tools, techniques, methods and approaches for achieving a desired end state through change. Change

management focuses on a successful transition from one state to another [9].

The organizational change process management has two fundamental purposes:

* to help the organization to meet objectives that may not be achieved in the current organization and operation conditions;

* to minimize the negative impact of any change.

Professor Eugen Burduç believes that change management is the whole of the forecasting, organization, coordination, training and control processes related to certain

replacement, modification, transformation or upheaval measures in the form and content of the organization, to increase its efficiency and competitiveness [2].

Page 2 of 5

10/26/2017https://search-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/printviewfile?accountid=27965

Change management is of major importance from both a theoretical and methodological point of view (being a scientific discipline of the managerial disciplines family)

and in terms of practical use. The argument for this assertion is that a well-designed, organized, coordinated and implemented change may lead to a significant

improvement in the performance of an organization.

In our view, the management of organizational change processes lies in a logical sequence of progressive steps in which programs of measures and actions are designed

and implemented to improve the processes and activities of the organization, the ultimate goal being the increase of its competitiveness.

The change management process, as any managerial process, contains three main phases: forecasting, operational and final measurement and interpretation of results

[6],

The first phase, in which a forecasting management is manifested, involves setting the objectives, identifying the resources and defining strategic options through which

the objectives can be achieved, given the resources of the organization.

The operational phase of the change management process, in which an operative management is carried out, includes four steps:

* determination and delimitation of activities;

* distribution of activities on organizational subunits;

* coordination organizational processes and activities;

* involvement of human resources in processes and activities.

The third phase, the measurement and interpretation of results, in which the management is post-operative, essentially consists of:

* control of processes and activities;

* assessing the performance by comparison with the level of forecast objectives;

* identifying the causes of the deviations;

* initiating corrective measures to improve processes and activities in the next managerial cycle.

The essence of the change management process is captured in Figure 1.

In another approach, the change management process may be structured into the following main steps [9]:

* learning the basic elements (source of change, opportunity of change, impact of change);

* understanding the objectives (setting and testing the objectives, identifying the modality in which the gap may be cancelled, i.e. the difference between the current

state and the desired state, and defining the limits imposed on the change);

* setting up a change team (identifying the guarantor of change, creating a coordination committee, appointing a change team manager, configuring a network of

change agents and supporters, initial evaluation of the support and opposition from employees);

* change planning (setting the main activities, drafting their schedule, identifying the necessary resources, obtaining the approval for the initiation of the change

process);

* assessing the availability and the capacity for change (setting the change impact, forecasting the reactions that may occur in the change process, identifying the

actions that have to be included in the change plan, assessing the impact on infrastructure);

* implementing the change (plan operationalization, implementation process monitoring, detecting and solving the issues that occur during the implementation, testing

solutions);

* change consolidation (support provided for employees to adapt, recognition of errors occurring in previous stages, completion of change process);

* administering the communication process (coordinating and communication process, appointing a communication manager, conceiving key-messages, setting the

schedule and the communication channels, assigning the main communication duties, applying the communication plan);

* preparing future changes (reexamining the current change, identifying possible future changes, preparation for continuous change).

4. Resistance to change

Resistance to change is an important aspect among the organizational change issues. In general, people do not like change, unless they are convinced that they will

enjoy some benefits further to its implementation.

For example, an organization is to introduce a new technology that will relieve employees of certain current tasks, which will be reflected in the reduction of the burden

on the working hours, and implicitly, of the organizational stress. If the employees are told this, resistance to change will be much diminished. Moreover, many

employees will be motivated by the advantages of the new technologies and will support enthusiastically the implementation of the change.

Communication between managers and employees is important even if the arguments in favor of implementing a change project are obvious. Managers have many roles

in the context of organizational changes, one of them being to explain the need and opportunity for change to the employees. Employees must understand their role in

the success of the change implementation process, and also become aware that they will enjoy additional benefits as a result of increased economic and social

performance of the organization.

There are a number of theories suggesting that each person must go through several steps to adapt to a new context resulted from a change. One of these theories,

known as the Hopson model, has structured the process of adapting to change in the following stages [8]:

* immobilization (maintaining a certain state of stability during the performance of change);

* mitigation (while recognizing the need for change, the employee has a tendency to mitigate its importance);

Page 3 of 5

10/26/2017https://search-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/printviewfile?accountid=27965

* depression (during the periods of major change, the employee is depressed, lacking motivation and having a bad mood);

* acceptance of reality and renunciation (the employee accepts the reality and the new state of affairs, "gives up" on the past and starts preparing for the future);

* testing (individuals become more motivated and channel their energy towards new attitudes and behaviors appropriate to the new context);

* search for meaning (the employee reflects on the change that has occurred and starts feeling that he is more efficient from the experience which he lived);

* internalization (the new thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behaviors of the employee become stable and integrated into daily work).

Generally, all the employees of an organization go through these stages of the process of adapting to change, but obviously the pace at which they go through them is

different, depending on the psychological and behavioral profile of each.

The good "managers-employees" communication may reduce the process of adapting to change. Thus, in the change preparation stage, it is important for managers to

transmit to the employees, in an accurate and consistent manner, the objectives that they must fulfill. Also, the employees must understand how the individual goals fit

into the new system of objectives of the organization. In the change implementation phase, each employee has a schedule of activities with well-established durations

and deadlines that they have to follow in order to fulfill the new objectives and tasks incumbent upon them.

It is essential that the managers, through the power of their own example, mobilize their employees and impress upon them a new kind of attitude towards change.

Competitive, sustainable organizations are those in which the employees exhibit a pro-learning and pro-change attitude. Organizational changes always involve

information gathering, knowledge and skills, which are the most important sources of competitive advantage in contemporary economy.

5. Conclusions

Organizations need to have wellgrounded and functional strategies, policies and programs, with realistic targets, with resources allocated rationally and effectively

according to the principle of ranking strategic priorities, with deadlines established clearly, yet which may be subject to redefinitions, adjustments and rearrangements

depending on the opportunities that may arise in the business environment, new contexts, situations and rules requiring appropriate behaviors, attitudes and managerial

decisions at organizational level.

Organizational change includes a series of activities in which the organization is prepared to acquire the skills needed to implement a new managerial strategy. It is

important that organizations understand the meaning of change and tackle it as a source for improving processes and activities, so as to increase performance and

competitiveness.

The management of organizational change processes lies in a logical sequence of progressive steps in which programs of measures and actions are designed and

implemented to improve the processes and activities of the organization, the ultimate goal being the increase of its competitiveness.

Resistance to change is an important aspect among the organizational change issues. The good "managers-employees" communication may reduce the process of

adapting to change. In the change preparation stage, it is important for managers to transmit to the employees, in an accurate and consistent manner, the objectives

that they must fulfill. In the change implementation phase, each employee has a schedule of activities with well-established durations and deadlines

that they have to follow in order to fulfill the objectives and tasks incumbent upon them.

References

REFERENCES:

1. Andrews, J., Cameron, H., Harris, M. (2008), All change? Managers' experience of organizational change in theory and practice, Journal of Organizational Change

Management, Vol.21, No.3.

2. Burdug, E., Càpràrescu, G, Androniceanu, A. (2008), Managementul schimbärii organizational Editura Economics, Bucuregti.

3. Clarke, L. (2002), Managementul schimbärii. Ghid practic privind producerea, mentinerea gi controlul schimbärii într-o firmä sau organizatie, Editura Teora, Bucuregti.

4. Haoa, M. J., & Yazdanifarda, R. (2015). How Effective Leadership can Facilitate Change in Organizations through Improvement and Innovation, Global Journal of

Management and Business, Vol.15, No. 9.

5. Higgs, M., Rowland, D. (2011), What Does It Take to Implement Change Successfully? A Study of the Behaviors of Successful Change Leaders, The Journal of Applied

Behavioral Science, Vol. 47, No. 3.

6. Ionescu, V. (2014), Leadership, Culture and Organizational Change, Revista MANAGER nr.20, Editura Universitätii din Bucuregti.

7. Ionescu, V., Comescu, V., Druicä, E. (2012), Flexible Organization, Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, Vol.4, No.3&4, Florida, USA.

8. Makin, P., Cox, Ch. (2006), Schimbarea in organizatii. Optimizarea comportamentului angajatilor, Editura Polirom,, Iagi.

9. Newton, R. (2009), Managementul schimbärii pas eu pas. Tot ceea ce vä trebuie pentru a alcätui gi a realiza un plan, Editura ALL, Bucuregti.

10. Verboncu, I., Nicolescu, O., Popa, I., Ceptureanu, E., Ceptureanu,, S. (2011), Schimbarea organizational prin reengineering, Editura ASE, Bucuregti.

AuthorAffiliation

~ Ph. D. Associate Professor Vladimir-Codrin Ionescu (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Business and Administration, Romania)

E-mail: [email protected]

~ Ph. D. Cristina Boleas (, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Business and Administration, Romania)

E-mail: [email protected]

Page 4 of 5

10/26/2017https://search-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/printviewfile?accountid=27965

Details

Subject Organizational change;

Behavior;

Mutation;

Strategic planning;

Total quality;

Employees;

Competitive advantage;

Management by objectives;

Quality management

Classification 2500: Organizational behavior

2310: Planning

Title Management of Organizational Change Processes

Author Ionescu, Vladimir-Codrin; Bolcas, Cristina

Publication title Manager; Bucharest

Issue 22

Pages 86-93

Number of pages 8

Publication year 2015

Publication date 2015

Publisher University of Bucharest, Faculty of Administration and Business

Place of publication Bucharest

Country of publication Romania

Publication subject Business And Economics--Management, Public Administration,

Business And Economics--Marketing And Purchasing

ISSN 14530503

Source type Scholarly Journals

Language of publication English

Document type Feature

Document feature References; Diagrams

ProQuest document ID 1785752011

Document URL http://library.capella.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-

com.library.capella.edu/docview/1785752011?accountid=27965

Last updated 2016-05-13

Database ProQuest Central

Page 5 of 5

10/26/2017https://search-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/printviewfile?accountid=27965