project management
344SAM Project Management L3: Initiation and Planning
Learning Outcomes
Understand the process of initiation
Describe the function and purpose of the Business Case
Understand the first stages of project planning (to be continued in next lecture)
Project Lifecycle
What project?
Question
If you are deciding which projects to invest in within your organisation, what types of things do you need to consider?
“Investment appraisal is a collection of techniques used to identify the attractiveness of an investment”.
APM (2012)
Organisations use projects to convert strategy into new products, services and processes needed for success
Project selection needs to be aligned with the company’s strategy
Needs to ensure a strong link between projects and the strategic plan
→ Clear focus
Best use of scarce resources
Work within given constraints
According to Descamps (1999), PMs who do not understand the relationship between projects and strategy tend to make the following mistakes:
Focus on issues that have low strategic priority
Focus on the immediate customer rather than the market and value chain
Trying to solve every customer issue (80:20 law)
Engaging in a never-ending search for perfection.
“
Stages
Assess the feasibility of the project (project selection model)
Build the business case
Two broad types of project selection models:
Numeric
Non-numeric
1. Checklist Model
Make a checklist against which you screen potential projects
For example:
Cost of development
Potential return on investment
Stability of funding
Stakeholder support
Durability and market potential
Pros and Cons of Checklist model
Assumes that all factors are equal
There are so many potential factors it is easy to miss important ones
Good for discussion
Good for highlighting potential problems and benefits
Good for highlighting priorities
2. Scoring Models
Weight – most important criteria are given a higher score
Score – does the project score high (3), medium (2) or low (1) on each criterion?
Multiply importance x score to arrive at weighted score
Add weighted scores to arrive at an overall project score.
| PROJECT | CRITERIA | WEIGHT | SCORE | WEIGHTED SCORE |
| Alpha | Cost | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Potential profit | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Development Risk | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Time to Market | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
| 13 | ||||
| Beta | Cost | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Potential Profit | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Development Risk | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Time to Market | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| 19 |
Limitations?
???
???
Limitations of Scoring models
Scoring models try to impose structure
Treating high, medium and low as numerical values is mathematically wrong (difference between)
If project Alpha scores 13 and Beta 19, can we assume that Beta is 46% better?
No!
3. Payback period
How long will it take for the project to pay back its initial budget and begin to generate positive cash flow?
Project costs
Project revenue streams
How long will it take to reach breakeven point?
Shorter paybacks are better than longer ones
Payback period example
| Years | Cash Flow Machine A | Cash Flow Machine B |
| 0 | (35,000) | (35,000) |
| 1 | 20,000 | 10,000 |
| 2 | 15,000 | 10,000 |
| 3 | 10,000 | 15,000 |
| 4 | 10,000 | 20,000 |
| Payback period | 2 years | 3 years |
Limitations?
After payback period?
Time value?
???
???
4. Net Present Value
NPV = the most popular financial decision making tool
NPV assesses the change in the organisation’s value if a project is undertaken
It is the reverse of ‘compound interest’
Positive NPV – the firm will make money
Negative NPV – the firm will lose money
Example NPV (Kerzner, 2009: 616)
| Year | Cash inflows (£) | Present Value (£) | |
| 1 | 1,000 | 909 | |
| 2 | 2,000 | 1,653 | |
| 3 | 2,000 | 1,503 | |
| 4 | 5,000 | 3,415 | |
| 5 | 2,000 | 1,242 | |
| Present value of cash inflows: | £8,722 | ||
| Less investment | £10,000 | ||
| Net present value | (1,278) | ||
16
Limitations of NPV
In times of financial instability, it can be difficult to make assumptions and/or predictions about future interest rates.
5. The sacred cow
Projects are selected based on ‘who decides’
High risk
Difficult for Project Managers to navigate
The Business Case (Prince 2)
Business Case contains:
Reasons
Business Options
Expected benefits / dis-benefits
Timescales
Costs
Investment appraisal
Risks
Refer to Prince2 Business Case: https ://www.prince2.com/prince2-business-case
Conclusion
Deciding which project to pursue and which to reject can be difficult
Not an exact science
No model can fully capture reality and anticipate the future
Managers are not necessarily rational
Project selection is far more subjective than some models suggest
Project Planning (Part 1)
Project Management
Project Lifecycle
Where to start?
Why is planning important?
Project Management Plan
Why - statement of the change: definition need, problem or opportunity; relate to business case
What - objectives, scope, deliverables with acceptance criteria, success criteria, KPIs. Also takes into account constraints, assumptions and dependencies
How - strategy, handover, tools and techniques, monitoring and control, reporting
How much - budget, and cost management
Who - key roles and responsibilities, and the plan for resources
When - timescales, milestones, phasing
Where - geographic locations which will impact costs and people
Policies and plans - for managing change, communication, configuration, governance, health and safety, environmental issues, procurement, quality and risk
Schedule Management
“A schedule is the timetable for a project. It shows how the work will progress over a period of time and takes into account factors such as limited resources and estimating uncertainty.”
APM (2012)
“
Managing the planning process
Breaking down complex activities into chunks
Determining sequence
Estimating time
Planning costs
Logical basis for making decisions
Shows effects on other systems
Filtering ideas
Work breakdown structure (WBS)
What is a work breakdown structure?
“a logical, hierarchical tree of all the tasks needed to complete a project”
Lock (2007:165)
A WBS organises tasks into a logical sequence, allowing them to be planned in time and allocated to people
Dissertation
Identify Problem
Literature Review
Methodology
Data Gathering
Data Analysis
Conclusion
What
How
Why
Questionnaire
Interview
Case Study
Observation
Experiment
Questionnaire Design
Questionnaire Pilot
Questionnaire Correction
WBS – diagrammatic view
Advantages and Disadvantages Work Breakdown Structure
Breaks the project down into manageable, measurable tasks
Adopts the typical analytical process
Can be done as a team
Weakness is based around communication and co-ordination
Some things may still be unknown
How much detail to go into?
30
Process Mapping
Further reading
Maylor, H. (2010) Project Management. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall (Chapter 8 pgs 185 – 195)
Maylor, H. (2010) Project Management. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall (Chapter 5)
Pinto, J.K (2013) Project Management, Achieving Competitive Advantage. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson (Chapter 3)
Prince2 Business Case: https:// www.prince2.com/prince2-business-case
References
APM (2012) APM Body of Knowledge. 6th ed. Bucks: APM
Lock, D. (2010) Project Management. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall
Maylor, H. (2010) Project Management. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall
Office of Government Commerce (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2: 2009 Edition . Norwich: TSO
Pinto, J.K. (2013) Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson
Thanks!
Any questions?