short response

for a short response, it occurs to me to invite consideration of how (and what) either Irigaray or Goux bring to our set of conversations circulating on and around Mauss’ study of the gift.

Try to identify some particular feature (or a couple of features) from the text shedding light on a conventional or alternative logic or ethos of exchange .

How does this add to, reinforce or challenge considerations already in play and with what potential consequence?

 

 

Read the article and write double space one page response.