Research Project-Week Three 100% Orginal
Research Project-Week Three
You will receive feedback on the previous week's assignment by Sunday 11:59pm. Before you complete your Week Three assignment, please read your instructor’s comments about your Week Two assignment, as well as this week’s lecture. Be sure to include any suggested changes in your project going forward.
In a three- to four- page paper (not including the title and reference pages), provide
• A revised version of your introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, and sampling plan. These revisions must be based on your instructor’s feedback if your instructor provided additional comments about these sections in Week Two.
• A discussion of the types of secondary data you could use to test your hypothesis, and why this data would be useful. If secondary data would not be appropriate, please explain why.
• The possible measurement and measurement scales you could use in a survey for testing your hypothesis. If a survey with measurement scales would not be appropriate, please explain why.
• A reference list documented in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Your paper must be formatted according to APA style
Total Possible Score: 8.00
Includes a Revised Version of the Introduction, Research Question, Background Research, Hypothesis, Research Design, and Sampling Plan
Distinguished - Includes all suggested revisions of the introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis research design, and sampling plan.
Proficient - Includes most of the suggested revisions of the introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, and sampling plan. The revised version is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Includes some of the suggested revisions of the introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, and sampling plan. The revised version is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Does not include the suggested revisions of the introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, and sampling plan. The revised version is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The revised version of the introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, and sampling plan is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Possible Types of Secondary Data Used for Hypothesis Testing, Including a Discussion of Whether or Not One or More Types of Secondary Data Could Be Used to Test the Hypothesis, and Why This Secondary Data Would or Would Not Be Useful
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the possible types of secondary data used for hypothesis testing, including a comprehensive discussion of whether or not one or more types of secondary data could be used to test your hypothesis, and why this secondary data would or would not be useful.
Proficient - Describes the possible types of secondary data used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not one or more types of secondary data could be used to test your hypothesis, and why this secondary data would or would not be useful. The description or discussion is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat describes the possible types of secondary data used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not one or more types of secondary data could be used to test your hypothesis, and why this secondary data would or would not be useful. The description and/or discussion are underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the possible types of secondary data used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not one or more types of secondary data could be used to test your hypothesis, and why this secondary data would or would not be useful; however, the description and discussion are significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the possible types of secondary data used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not one or more types of secondary data could be used to test hypothesis, and why this secondary data would or would not be useful are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Possible Measurement Benchmarks and Scales Used for Hypothesis Testing, Including a Discussion of Whether or Not the Survey Should Include Measurement Benchmarks and Scales to Test the Hypothesis, and Why These Measurement Benchmarks and Scales Would or Would Not Be Useful
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the possible measurement benchmarks and scales used for hypothesis testing, including a comprehensive discussion of whether or not your survey should include measurement benchmarks and scales to test your hypothesis, and why these measurement benchmarks and scales would or would not be useful.
Proficient - Describes the possible measurement benchmarks and scales used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not your survey should include measurement benchmarks and scales to test your hypothesis, and why these measurement benchmarks and scales would or would not be useful. The description or discussion is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat describes the possible measurement benchmarks and scales used for hypothesis testing, including a limited discussion of whether or not your survey should include measurement benchmarks and scales to test your hypothesis, and why these measurement benchmarks and scales would or would not be useful. The description and/or discussion are underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the possible measurement benchmarks and scales used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not your survey should include measurement benchmarks and scales to test your hypothesis, and why these measurement benchmarks and scales would or would not be useful; however, the description and discussion are significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The description of the possible measurement benchmarks and scales used for hypothesis testing, including a discussion of whether or not your survey should include measurement benchmarks and scales to test your hypothesis, and why these measurement benchmarks and scales would or would not be useful are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Evidence
Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.
Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
10 years ago
15
Purchase the answer to view it

- order_15765_research_project-week.docx
Purchase the answer to view it

- bus_642_week_3_service_quality_improvement.docx
- HIST homwork
- Financial Statement Development and Analysis - DQ 07
- Financial Statement Development and Analysis - DQ 5
- Health Challenges Faced by Older Adults
- Disorders Worksheet
- Health Care Database Systems in Practice
- Assignment 2: Problem Solving
- Discussion Post
- Assign#2 Adjustment Case Study
- Assignment 2 LASA 1 (Genesis Cash Budget Report)
