Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design
Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design
- Support the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. From a management standpoint, it may be important to show the efficiencies that can be gained for executive oversight.
- Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Note: The minimum requirement for the schema should entail the tables, fields, relationships, views, and indexes.
- Identify and create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Then, identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).
- Identify and create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix. Explain your rationale behind the design of the E-R Diagram.
- Identify and create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix. Explain the rationale behind the design of your DFD.
- Illustrate the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. The diagram should map data between source systems, operational systems, data warehouses and specified data marts. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
- Include charts or diagrams created in MS Visio or Dia as an appendix of the design document. All references to these diagrams must be included in the body of the design document.
- Update the project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks.
- Describe the methods and best practices in implementing process change in IT organizations.
- Describe the role and methods of technology-induced process improvement in organizations.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in information systems.
- Write clearly and concisely about leadership issues and strategic insight of the Information systems domain using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Points: 120 | Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design | ||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A | |
Section 1: Design Document | |||||
1a. Support the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely supported the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. | Partially supported the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. | Satisfactorily supported the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. | Thoroughly supported the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. | |
1b. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Partially created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Partially explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Satisfactorily created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Thoroughlycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | |
1c. Identify and create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Then, identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF). Weight: 10% | Did not submit or incompletely identified and created database tables within appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys, and did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved. Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). | Partially identified and created database tables within appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, and partially explained how referential integrity will be achieved. Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). | Satisfactorily identified and created database tables within appropriate field-naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys, and satisfactorily explained how referential integrity will be achieved. Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). | Thoroughly identified and created database tables within appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys, and thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved. Thoroughly normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). | |
1d. Identify and create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Explain the rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Did not submit or incompletely identified and created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Did not submit or incompletely explained the rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Partially identified and created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Partially explained the rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Satisfactorily identified and created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Satisfactorily explained the rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Thoroughly identified and created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Thoroughly explained the rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | |
1e. Identify and create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely identified and created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Partially identified and created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Satisfactorily identified and created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Thoroughly identified and created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | |
1f. Illustrate the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. The diagram must map data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely illustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Did not submit or incompletely mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Partiallyillustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Partially mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Satisfactorily illustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Satisfactorily mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Thoroughlyillustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Thoroughly mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | |
Section 2: Revised Project Plan | |||||
2. Update the project plan from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks. Weight: 5% | Did not submit or incompletely updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks. | Partially updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks. | Satisfactorily updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) newproject tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks. | Thoroughly updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks. | |
3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | More than 6 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present | |
9 years ago
40
Purchase the answer to view it

- project_deliverable_3_database_and_data_warehousing_design.docx
- section_2_revised_project_plan_3.mpp
Purchase the answer to view it

- project_deliverable_3-database_and_data_warehousing_design.doc
- project_deliverable_3-plan_summary.doc
- Health Administration (Term Paper)
- Alternatives for managing risk
- Java progamming
- Begin a research paper
- NURS 6053 week 8 Assignment
- BUS 375 ASSIGNMENT
- Accounting Discussion question
- Announcements for 84 upcoming engineering conferences were randomly picked from a stack of IEEE Spectrum
- Discussion question #1
- a. Compute the 95% confidence interval for the percent of homeowners who are dissatisfied with their