writing 3

Kayla0206

1000 words

  • 2 years ago
  • 15
files (2)

Essay3CaseStudy.docx

Paper 3: Case Study of an Advocacy Piece (75 points)

For this assignment, think about an issue that is personal and meaningful for you and one that you think you could be a good advocate for. Begin a research campaign to investigate what is currently being done on this issue, and then write a case study on one specific advocacy project that you have come across in your research.

Part One will be an introduction to the issue, explaining what it is and why it is urgent. The introduction should be concise and informative, drawing on your research to establish the most important elements of the issue, including the history, the current state of advocacy including progress made by previous advocacy, the audience/s for this issue, and the contexts in which it occurs.

Part Two: Examine one current piece of advocacy on this issue, and analyze it rhetorically, determining it strengths and weaknesses. What is being accomplished? Who is being reached? Who isn’t? Who or what has been overlooked? What is the scope? How is it being presented or delivered? What still needs to happen? Could this be more effective? How so?

Part Three: Reflect and speculate about what you personally can do as an advocate for this subject. What is your sphere of influence? Who can you reach? Where would you begin and what kind of buy-in would you need? What do you think would be an effective next step or helpful addition or expansion to the current advocacy?

Review

We will peer review the papers in class.

Revision and Self-Review

After the Peer Reviews, you will complete a Revision of your paper based upon the feedback you received from your peer reviewers. Then you will complete a Self-Review before you turn in your Final Draft.

General Information about the Assignment:

· Essays will be typed in 12 point Times New Roman or Cambria font with standard margins.

· First draft – 2-3 pages of text

· Final draft 3-4 pages of text

· MLA format with Work Cited page. (Link to the Writing Center Template is in Resources folder in Blackboard under Course Content.)

· See Syllabus for Due Dates

Submission Information:

For this assignment, papers will be submitted to me in the following order and have the following point values:

· First Draft 10 points

· Peer Review 10 points

· Self-Review 10 points

· Final Draft 45 points

Assignment 3 is worth 75 points. The Rubric will be posted in Blackboard.

Special thanks to Professor White

Essay3Rubric.docx

ENGL1010: Essay #3

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Introduction (Organization)

The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. Fully addresses all requirements in a sophisticated manner.

The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.

The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.

There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.

Sequencing (Organization)

Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.

Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.

Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.

Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.

Support for Topic (Content)

Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Fully addresses all journalist's questions.

Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported.

Addresses most journalist's questions.

Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported. Missing one or more important journalist's questions.

Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.

Recognition of Reader (Voice)

The reader's questions are anticipated and answered thoroughly and completely.

The reader's questions are anticipated and answered to some extent.

The reader is left with one or two questions. More information is needed to "fill in the blanks".

The reader is left with several questions.

Adding Personality (Voice)

The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."

The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.

The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.

The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.

Sentence Length (Sentence Fluency)

Every paragraph has sentences that vary in length.

Almost all paragraphs have sentences that vary in length.

Some sentences vary in length.

Sentences rarely vary in length.

Conclusion (Organization)

The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."

The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.

The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.

There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.

Sources (Content)

All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.

All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and most are cited correctly.

Most sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.

Many sources used for quotes and facts are less than credible (suspect) and/or are not cited correctly.

Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)

Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Capitalization & Punctuation (Conventions)

Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.

Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.

Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.

Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.

Special thanks to Dr. C. Hague