Revised chapter 3
6 hours ago 20
Feedbackchapter3.pdf
Feedbackchapter3.pdf
Darlene, Congratulations on completing a full draft of this chapter! You have the majority of your capstone drafted now, and that is something to pause and celebrate. As usual, I have left you some feedback throughout the sections of the chapter. The major issue is that too many parts of the actual study remain undecided. Your chapter identifies action research as the design, but the action-research cycle itself is not yet defined. You state that the number and sequence of cycles will be determined later. Likewise, the school setting remains generic, participant groups “might” include a teacher and students, the sample size is undetermined, you have not selected between interviews and focus groups, the observation instrument has not been finalized, and the number and length of observations remain open. These decisions need to be made before Chapter 3 can be approved. The action-research issue is especially important. Your current procedures describe a strong qualitative investigation of existing practice, but they do not yet clearly show what action will be taken to improve or refine practice and how that action will be examined through an iterative cycle. If action research remains the design, make that cycle visible throughout Research Design, Procedures, Data Collection, and Data Synthesis. You also need to clarify how evidence for the three dimensions of engagement will be generated. Behavioral engagement can be documented through observable classroom behavior, but emotional and cognitive engagement should not be inferred confidently from outward reactions alone. Your own draft later recognizes this limitation. Use observations primarily for behavior and context, and participant accounts or other appropriate evidence for students' emotional and cognitive experiences. Because students are minors, finalize the practical ethical procedures as well. In particular, explain what happens during classroom observation when some students or families decline research participation. Students who remain in a classroom may still be visible to the researcher, but participation in instruction is not consent to participate in research. The final protocol must explain how information about nonparticipants will be excluded. These areas do not need more content. Let's focus this revision on providing the missing details so that we can look at the full picture of all of the nuts and bolts of what you are designing. From there we can then dive deeper into clarity, coherence, and polish
Feedbackchapter3.pdf
Darlene, Congratulations on completing a full draft of this chapter! You have the majority of your capstone drafted now, and that is something to pause and celebrate. As usual, I have left you some feedback throughout the sections of the chapter. The major issue is that too many parts of the actual study remain undecided. Your chapter identifies action research as the design, but the action-research cycle itself is not yet defined. You state that the number and sequence of cycles will be determined later. Likewise, the school setting remains generic, participant groups “might” include a teacher and students, the sample size is undetermined, you have not selected between interviews and focus groups, the observation instrument has not been finalized, and the number and length of observations remain open. These decisions need to be made before Chapter 3 can be approved. The action-research issue is especially important. Your current procedures describe a strong qualitative investigation of existing practice, but they do not yet clearly show what action will be taken to improve or refine practice and how that action will be examined through an iterative cycle. If action research remains the design, make that cycle visible throughout Research Design, Procedures, Data Collection, and Data Synthesis. You also need to clarify how evidence for the three dimensions of engagement will be generated. Behavioral engagement can be documented through observable classroom behavior, but emotional and cognitive engagement should not be inferred confidently from outward reactions alone. Your own draft later recognizes this limitation. Use observations primarily for behavior and context, and participant accounts or other appropriate evidence for students' emotional and cognitive experiences. Because students are minors, finalize the practical ethical procedures as well. In particular, explain what happens during classroom observation when some students or families decline research participation. Students who remain in a classroom may still be visible to the researcher, but participation in instruction is not consent to participate in research. The final protocol must explain how information about nonparticipants will be excluded. These areas do not need more content. Let's focus this revision on providing the missing details so that we can look at the full picture of all of the nuts and bolts of what you are designing. From there we can then dive deeper into clarity, coherence, and polish
- Answer the following questions with at least 100 words per answer
- discussion
- questions are below
- Week 4 - Assignment 1(help)
- The end points of DEF are D(1,4) and F(16,14). Determine and state the coordinates of point E, if DE:EF equals...
- ECON 4a
- Dispositional, Biological and Evolutionary Theory Newspaper Article
- Your city: is it humane, is it sustainable?
- 09D2-08- Assume that you are in a position of power over the violator. Assess how you, as a public administrator, can uphold the highest ethical standards and integrity when faced with rules, regulations, protocols, or actions of your superiors that app
- EDU 659 week 1 Assignment