Due 6/21
see attached
11 hours ago 55
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesTemplate.docx
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesAssignmentInstructions.docx
CaseStudyGradingRubric6.pdf
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesTemplate.docx
PADM 708
Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Template
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF ZONING CATEGORIES
PROBLEMS AND ISSUES WITH ZONING CATEGORIES
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANCE OF ZONING CATEGORIES
PERMIT REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USES
VARIANCES
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF S/D REGS
PROBLEMS AND ISSUES WITH S/D REGS
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANCE OF S/D REGS
PERMIT REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USES
VARIANCES
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
CONCLUSION
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 708
Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Assignment Instructions
Overview
This case study assignment is designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.
Instructions
For this Case Study, you will first discuss and analyze Types of Zoning (e.g., residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, or, other types of zoning) and Subdivision Regulations. Then, discuss and analyze the differences between Euclidean zoning, form-based codes, and performance-based zoning. Further you will discuss and analyze the Problems/Issues with Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. Additionally, you will discuss and analyze the Importance of the following Zoning and Subdivision Regulations: ✓ Permit Review ✓ Conditional Uses ✓ Variances ✓ Administrative Remedies. Finally, you will determine a biblical viewpoint concerning these planning functions. Please use scripture to support the position. Integrate Biblical verses rather than at the end of the paper. Items to include are outlined as follows:
· Length of assignment is 2,000 – 2,500-words (8 – 10-pages)
· Not including title page, reference page, and any appendices.
· Format of assignment: APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.
· Number of citations: 8 – 10 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and Biblical reference) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. These must be cited in accordance with APA guidelines.
· Acceptable sources: Use scholarly sources only. No websites, podcasts, dictionaries, encyclopedias, or magazines. Peer reviewed journal articles, dissertations, and textbooks only.
This assignment includes a template titled, Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Template. This template lays out for you the organization of your paper by providing all sections titles and format to which they need to be included. Use this template to accurately complete this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
This is a doctoral-level research assignment designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.
As with all doctoral-level assignments, you are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis; mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice. A doctoral level course requires description and analysis. While descriptions certainly are the precursor to analyses, they are not the analyses. Analysis is not just opinion statements or a list of what authors have said. Each idea needs elaboration and explanation and, if possible, supported by data and/or credible sources. The analysis should demonstrate the ability to integrate theories with applications.
You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial point deductions. No slang, idioms, jargon, colloquialisms, and everyday language. Your writing must be scholarly.
Plagiarism in any form, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited and may result in failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand fully what constitutes the various forms of plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism. Consult the LUO Honor Code.
Page 1 of 2
CaseStudyGradingRubric6.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Analysis and Critique of Material
30 to >26 pts
Advanced
All elements of the assigned topic are substantive, clearly, and completely addressed in light of the required page count. Analyses flow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail.
26 to >22 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way but the paper would benefit from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed. Complex issues are recognized.
22 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Organization 24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper effectively uses headings and subheadings as appropriate to focus on and deepen analyses.
21 to >18 pts
Proficient
The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
18 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not flow logically or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper lacks an adequate introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Critique, Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
30 to >26 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and ideas are critically evaluated and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
26 to >22 pts
Proficient
Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas but would benefit from greater critique, evaluation, and syntheses.
22 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but are not critically evaluated and/or not used in an effective manner. The paper would benefit from more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics 12 to >10 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is precise and word choice is appropriate. Paper is 8 – 10 pages.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is sufficient and word choice is adequate. Paper is 6 – 8 pages.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Paper does not meet the length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Current APA Format Elements
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in the current APA style. Title page, bibliography, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of high quality.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in the current APA style with few errors. Title page, bibliography, etc. are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of acceptable quality.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the current APA style, though several errors are present. Title page, bibliography, etc., are included, though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. The paper is acceptably formatted.
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Research Elements
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
High quality primary and secondary sources are utilized in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. At least 8 – 10 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research reflects multiple viewpoints of complex issues. At least 6 – 8 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research does not reflect multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are only tangentially supported by research. Arguments incorporate research, but often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 pts
No Marks
12 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesTemplate.docx
PADM 708
Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Template
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF ZONING CATEGORIES
PROBLEMS AND ISSUES WITH ZONING CATEGORIES
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANCE OF ZONING CATEGORIES
PERMIT REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USES
VARIANCES
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF S/D REGS
PROBLEMS AND ISSUES WITH S/D REGS
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANCE OF S/D REGS
PERMIT REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USES
VARIANCES
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
CONCLUSION
CaseStudyUrbanPlanningDevelopmentIssuesAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 708
Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Assignment Instructions
Overview
This case study assignment is designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.
Instructions
For this Case Study, you will first discuss and analyze Types of Zoning (e.g., residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, or, other types of zoning) and Subdivision Regulations. Then, discuss and analyze the differences between Euclidean zoning, form-based codes, and performance-based zoning. Further you will discuss and analyze the Problems/Issues with Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. Additionally, you will discuss and analyze the Importance of the following Zoning and Subdivision Regulations: ✓ Permit Review ✓ Conditional Uses ✓ Variances ✓ Administrative Remedies. Finally, you will determine a biblical viewpoint concerning these planning functions. Please use scripture to support the position. Integrate Biblical verses rather than at the end of the paper. Items to include are outlined as follows:
· Length of assignment is 2,000 – 2,500-words (8 – 10-pages)
· Not including title page, reference page, and any appendices.
· Format of assignment: APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.
· Number of citations: 8 – 10 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and Biblical reference) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. These must be cited in accordance with APA guidelines.
· Acceptable sources: Use scholarly sources only. No websites, podcasts, dictionaries, encyclopedias, or magazines. Peer reviewed journal articles, dissertations, and textbooks only.
This assignment includes a template titled, Case Study: Urban Planning & Development Issues Template. This template lays out for you the organization of your paper by providing all sections titles and format to which they need to be included. Use this template to accurately complete this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
This is a doctoral-level research assignment designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.
As with all doctoral-level assignments, you are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis; mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice. A doctoral level course requires description and analysis. While descriptions certainly are the precursor to analyses, they are not the analyses. Analysis is not just opinion statements or a list of what authors have said. Each idea needs elaboration and explanation and, if possible, supported by data and/or credible sources. The analysis should demonstrate the ability to integrate theories with applications.
You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial point deductions. No slang, idioms, jargon, colloquialisms, and everyday language. Your writing must be scholarly.
Plagiarism in any form, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited and may result in failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand fully what constitutes the various forms of plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism. Consult the LUO Honor Code.
Page 1 of 2
CaseStudyGradingRubric6.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Analysis and Critique of Material
30 to >26 pts
Advanced
All elements of the assigned topic are substantive, clearly, and completely addressed in light of the required page count. Analyses flow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail.
26 to >22 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way but the paper would benefit from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed. Complex issues are recognized.
22 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Organization 24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper effectively uses headings and subheadings as appropriate to focus on and deepen analyses.
21 to >18 pts
Proficient
The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
18 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not flow logically or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper lacks an adequate introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Critique, Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
30 to >26 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and ideas are critically evaluated and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
26 to >22 pts
Proficient
Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas but would benefit from greater critique, evaluation, and syntheses.
22 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but are not critically evaluated and/or not used in an effective manner. The paper would benefit from more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics 12 to >10 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is precise and word choice is appropriate. Paper is 8 – 10 pages.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is sufficient and word choice is adequate. Paper is 6 – 8 pages.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Paper does not meet the length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Current APA Format Elements
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in the current APA style. Title page, bibliography, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of high quality.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in the current APA style with few errors. Title page, bibliography, etc. are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of acceptable quality.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the current APA style, though several errors are present. Title page, bibliography, etc., are included, though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. The paper is acceptably formatted.
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Research Elements
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
High quality primary and secondary sources are utilized in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. At least 8 – 10 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research.
10 to >8 pts
Proficient
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research reflects multiple viewpoints of complex issues. At least 6 – 8 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research does not reflect multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are only tangentially supported by research. Arguments incorporate research, but often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 pts
No Marks
12 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630
- Firewall/Router
- webassign
- SYNCO_SOLUTIONS - Human Resources Management
- Assignment 1
- English 215 assignment 3
- Social media
- USE OF MOBILE AND CLOUD TECHNOLOGY*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial*****Use as Guide Paper*****
- What is clustering steps for web server clustering
- SPSS
- EDU 100: Issues in Education Week 1 DQ 2