DUE 4/4.
SEE ATTACHED
3 months ago 30
CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf
CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx
CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Analysis, Critique of Material
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All elements of the assigned topic are substantive, clearly, and completely addressed in light of the required page count. Analyses ow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way but the paper would benet from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed. Complex issues are recognized.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Content – Organization
24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper eectively uses headings and subheadings as appropriate to focus on and deepen analyses.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not ow logically or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper lacks an adequate introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Critique, Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and ideas are critically evaluated and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas but would benet from greater critique, evaluation, and synthesis.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but are not critically evaluated and/or not used in an effective manner. The paper would benet from more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – Mechanics
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is precise and the word choice is appropriate. The Paper is 8-10 pages.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is sufficient and word choice is adequate. The Paper is 6–8 pages.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. The Paper does not meet the length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
13 pts
Structure – Current APA Format Elements
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in the current APA style. The title page, references, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of high quality.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in the current APA style with few errors. Title page, references, etc. are present with few errors. The Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of acceptable quality.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the current APA style, though several errors are present. Title page, references, etc., are included, though numerous errors are present. The Paper is double-spaced, but the margins or fonts are incorrect. The paper is acceptably formatted.
0 pts
Not Present
13 pts
Structure – Research Elements
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
High-quality primary and secondary sources are used in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. At least 8-10 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate references list is provided. Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are used. Research reflects multiple viewpoints of complex issues. At least 6–8 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate references list is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are used. Research does not reflect multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate references list is provided. Arguments are only tangentially supported by research. Arguments incorporate research, but often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 804
Case Study Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will complete 6 Case Study Assignments throughout this course. Below you will find a chart with each Case Study Assignment and the Module: Week it is due. You will also find the instructions and description for each assignment.
Instructions
· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis
· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.
· All citations and format must be in current APA format
· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis
· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
· Paper must be 8-10 pages ( Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment must be 10-12 pages).
Below is a chart with each Case Study Assignment and the Module: Week it is due.
|
Title of Assignment |
Module: Week |
|
Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment |
Module 2: Week 2 |
|
Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment |
Module 3: Week 3 |
|
Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment |
Module 4: Week 4 |
|
Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment |
Module 5: Week 5 |
|
Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment |
Module 6: Week 6 |
|
Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment |
Module 7: Week 7 |
Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment
Define the fiscal federalism model and provide a scholarly paper concerning the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to U.S. states and local governments.
Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment
Christensen and Wise (2009) state,
[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.
For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.
Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment
In 1959, Congress created the U.S. ACIR as a 26-member bipartisan federal commission to give continuing attention to intergovernmental problems (Pub. L. No. 86-380, 73 Stat. 703). On October 1, 1996, its authority to carry out the purposes stated in its Congressionally authorized legislation “sunset.”
Some scholars have called for its re-creation while others have mentioned it served little purpose. For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper for your support or denial of the re-establishment of the U.S. ACIR.
Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment
During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally, to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.
Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.
Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA.
Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8-10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment
Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters.
1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Analysis, Critique of Material
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All elements of the assigned topic are substantive, clearly, and completely addressed in light of the required page count. Analyses ow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way but the paper would benet from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed. Complex issues are recognized.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Content – Organization
24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper eectively uses headings and subheadings as appropriate to focus on and deepen analyses.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not ow logically or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper lacks an adequate introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Critique, Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and ideas are critically evaluated and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas but would benet from greater critique, evaluation, and synthesis.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but are not critically evaluated and/or not used in an effective manner. The paper would benet from more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – Mechanics
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is precise and the word choice is appropriate. The Paper is 8-10 pages.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is sufficient and word choice is adequate. The Paper is 6–8 pages.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. The writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. The Paper does not meet the length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
13 pts
Structure – Current APA Format Elements
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in the current APA style. The title page, references, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of high quality.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in the current APA style with few errors. Title page, references, etc. are present with few errors. The Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. The paper is properly formatted and of acceptable quality.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the current APA style, though several errors are present. Title page, references, etc., are included, though numerous errors are present. The Paper is double-spaced, but the margins or fonts are incorrect. The paper is acceptably formatted.
0 pts
Not Present
13 pts
Structure – Research Elements
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
High-quality primary and secondary sources are used in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. At least 8-10 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate references list is provided. Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are used. Research reflects multiple viewpoints of complex issues. At least 6–8 sources are used, in addition to the course text and the Bible. A complete and accurate references list is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are used. Research does not reflect multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate references list is provided. Arguments are only tangentially supported by research. Arguments incorporate research, but often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 804
Case Study Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will complete 6 Case Study Assignments throughout this course. Below you will find a chart with each Case Study Assignment and the Module: Week it is due. You will also find the instructions and description for each assignment.
Instructions
· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis
· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.
· All citations and format must be in current APA format
· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis
· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
· Paper must be 8-10 pages ( Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment must be 10-12 pages).
Below is a chart with each Case Study Assignment and the Module: Week it is due.
|
Title of Assignment |
Module: Week |
|
Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment |
Module 2: Week 2 |
|
Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment |
Module 3: Week 3 |
|
Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment |
Module 4: Week 4 |
|
Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment |
Module 5: Week 5 |
|
Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment |
Module 6: Week 6 |
|
Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment |
Module 7: Week 7 |
Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment
Define the fiscal federalism model and provide a scholarly paper concerning the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to U.S. states and local governments.
Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment
Christensen and Wise (2009) state,
[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.
For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.
Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment
In 1959, Congress created the U.S. ACIR as a 26-member bipartisan federal commission to give continuing attention to intergovernmental problems (Pub. L. No. 86-380, 73 Stat. 703). On October 1, 1996, its authority to carry out the purposes stated in its Congressionally authorized legislation “sunset.”
Some scholars have called for its re-creation while others have mentioned it served little purpose. For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper for your support or denial of the re-establishment of the U.S. ACIR.
Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment
During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally, to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.
Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.
Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA.
Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8-10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment
Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters.
1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
- GOVERMENTAL ACCOUNTING
- Assignment Choice #1: Direct and Indirect Cash Flow Models Complete the following exercise. Fill in the Excel spreadsheet provided via the link below to provide your answers to parts a and b. Then paste the Excel data into a Word document on which you can
- Patch Management Strategy Research Paper
- Research Paper GVPT 408 A261 Counterterrorism
- PCN-303 Topic 6 DQ 1
- Business Management
- hw
- Research report?
- see the PowerPoint and answer the sheet
- DNA