Research Paper GVPT 408 A261 Counterterrorism

profileeasy101

Final Paper 

No Plagiarism

A++++ work

Subject: Pentagon Gang   a Filipino terrorist group that broke away from the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in 2001 in orderto continue terrorism and kidnapping and extortion

 

The final paper must contain 10-12 full pages of content, double-spaced, with standard 1inch margins and 12-point standard font.  You must use APA or Chicago/Turabian style for citations.  All papers must use a minimum of five primary and five secondary sources.  You may use the sources assigned for this course, but you may not count them toward the minimum sources for your project.  At least two of your secondary sources must be academic journal articles.

 

Your paper should have a minimum of 10 sources, five primary and five secondary sources. (If you are unfamiliar with this distinction, check out the information here: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/ResearchW/resource.html.) Restrict your sources to newspaper articles from major national and international papers, published journals and magazine articles, academic sources, and websites from major organizations and government agencies. Course materials may be used as a reference, but it does not count toward the minimum number of sources. Encyclopedias and dictionaries are not appropriate sources for college level work. Online sources are fine, but they must be authoritative sources. Wikipedia, About.com, and other nonacademic websites are not acceptable sources. (Bear in mind that anyone can submit an article to Wikipedia.)

 

If you are unsure about how to determine whether an online source is a good one, the Online Writing Lab at Purdue University has an excellent resource guide: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_evalsource4.html. If you still have doubts as to whether a source is acceptable, send your instructor an e-mail.

 

Citations: All direct quotes from any source must be in quotation marks or indented and identified as a quotation in APA or Chicago/Turabian format. If you have questions about how to do this, consult the reference guides at UMUC's Effective Writing Center. In addition, anytime you use information from a source, even if it is not a direct quote, you must include the source.

When you use quotations in your paper, you must cite the source, using the standard APA or Turabian format. The general rule of thumb for the ratio of original writing to quotes is at least four lines of analysis for any line that you quote. For the most part, you should paraphrase your sources, instead of quoting directly. Remember, as well, that you must cite your source for any sections that are paraphrased or from which you used specific information. Generally speaking, unless the paragraph consists solely of analysis or your own opinion, you should be citing a source (or sources) at the end of the paragraph.

 

If you are unfamiliar with the rules on when and how to cite, consult this website: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.

 

Plagiarism: All work submitted must be original. Your instructor may submit all stages of this assignment to Turnitin, an online plagiarism analyzer. The database includes a variety of print sources and all online sources, as well as contributions from known "paper mills" and previously submitted papers from UMUC and other universities. Review the rules concerning plagiarism and academic integrity carefully. UMUC takes academic integrity very seriously. Plagiarism carries strict penalties, and any paper that is identified as plagiarized will receive a zero for that assignment. Serious cases of plagiarism may also result in formal charges. Do not wait until after you have submitted the paper to determine what constitutes plagiarism, because at that point it will be too late.

 

 Final Paper Rubric

Criteria

A

B

C

D

F

Content and analysis

(50%)

strong, analytical thesis

thesis clear, but more descriptive than analytical

thesis only descriptive

thesis unclear

no thesis

original interpretation of material

interpretation not original, but clearly expressed

interpretation relies heavily on other works

no interpretation, just description

lack of interpretation and description

demonstrates understanding of the model

demonstrates understanding of the model

errors in applying the model

lack of understanding of the model

lack of understanding of the model

consistent and effective use of three or more primary sources and eight or more secondary sources

consistent and effective use of two primary sources and seven secondary sources

incorporation of one primary source and six secondary sources

incorporation of one primary source and five secondary sources

incorporation of no primary sources and four or fewer secondary sources

Structure and organization (15%)

organization contributes to effectiveness of argument

 

organization is mostly logical, but could use improvement

organization is confusing; it is difficult to follow the analysis and narrative

 

organization is poor; analysis and narrative are garbled

 

organization is nonexistent; analysis and narrative do not make any sense

Writing style (15%)

sentences are well-constructed

sentences are mostly well-constructed

sentences are often unclear

sentences are often unintelligible

writing is unacceptably substandard

excellent word choice

generally appropriate word choice

word choice is often poor

word choice has obvious errors

word choice has severe errors

sources are used correctly and integrated into the paper

sources are mostly used correctly and integrated into the paper

sources are mostly used correctly, but are not integrated effectively into the paper

incorrect use of sources; lack of integration of sources

sources used poorly or not at all

transitions are clear and easy to follow

transitions are mostly clear and easy to follow

transitions are abrupt

lack of transitions

no transitions

Spelling, grammar, and punctuation (10%)

paper has 0–1 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors

paper has 2–3 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors

paper has 4–5 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors

paper has 6–7 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors

paper has eight or more spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors

Documentation

(10%)

paper has no more than one error in citation (formatting or use)

paper has 2–3 errors in citation

paper has 4–5 errors in citation

paper has 6–7 errors in citation

paper has eight or more errors in citation

    • 9 years ago
    • 40
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      pentagon_gang_12.docx
    Bids(1)