4.10 customer management(2)
CW2 anonymous marking enabled
Submission date: 31-Mar-2022 05:00AM (UTC+0100) Submission ID: File name: P Word count: 3138 Character count: 18413
1
2
3
4
5
FINAL GRADE
83/100
CW2 GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
What went well
Objectives are SMART, justified well.
Additional research carried out, well done.
Argument building noted with some level of critical analysis evident.
Able to draw on contemporary issue e.g. Covid in your discussion.
What could be improved
Strategies justified albeit strategy 1 and 2 overlap with social media.
Could have been defined content marketing in strategy 2
Overall, this is outstanding work demonstrating engagement, application, critical analysis and synthesis. Well done.
QM
PAGE 1
Anonymous marking
Anonymous marking enabled
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
Comment 1
good one.
PAGE 4
Comment 2
competitor included , good.
Comment 3
good.
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
Comment 4
good.
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
Comment 5
Should have included screenshots within report
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
RUBRIC: 2022 CM CW2
OBJECT& STRAT (10%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
JUST STRATEG (20%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
82.50 / 100
80 / 100
Objectives not identified/applied. Fails to provide digital strategies
Very poor outline of objectives and these do not necessarily meet SMART criteria. Provides very poor digital strategies and this not linked to objectives
Poor objectives outline and these do not necessarily meet SMART criteria. Provides poor digital strategies with some weak link to objectives
Reasonable objectives outline. Provided basic understanding of objectives meeting some SMART criteria. Reasonable digital strategies provided with some link to objectives
Provides effective objectives linked clearly to key Customer Lifecycle stages/terminology. Objectives satisfactorily meet SMART criteria. Satisfactory digital strategies provided with some link to objectives
Good objectives outline and these clearly linked to SMART criteria & Customer Lifecycle stages/terminology. Good digital strategies provided with clear links to set objectives
Very good objectives outline that displays a thorough ability to construct and organise arguments. Objectives are clearly linked to SMART criteria & Customer Lifecycle stages/terminology. Very good digital strategies provided with clear links to set objectives
Outstanding objectives outline that displays a thorough ability to construct and organise arguments. Objectives are clearly linked to SMART criteria & Customer Lifecycle stages/terminology. Outstanding digital strategies provided with clear links to set objectives
Excellent objectives outline that displays a thorough ability to construct and organise arguments. Objectives are clearly linked to SMART criteria & Customer Lifecycle. Excellent digital strategies provided with clear links to set objectives. Framing of objectives demonstrates excellent and up to date knowledge.
Objectives outline that displays a thorough ability to construct and organise arguments. Objectives are clearly linked to SMART criteria & Customer Lifecycle. Digital strategies provided with clear links to set objectives. Framing of objectives demonstrates excellent and up to date knowledge.
80 / 100
Screenshots market trends or evolving behaviour not shown
Justification with some indication of one of the following: screen shots, market trends or consumer behaviour
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
DISCUSSION (20%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
Justification with some indication of two of the following screen shots, market trends or consumer behaviour
Somewhat fair justification showing evidence of screen shots and trends
Fair justification of objectives and strategies supported by satisfactory evidence e.g., screenshots, market trends and consumer behaviour.
Good of objectives and strategies supported by satisfactory evidence e.g., screenshots, market & consumer behaviour trends.
Very good justification of objectives and strategies supported by satisfactory evidence e.g., screenshots, market & consumer behaviour trends.
An outstanding justification that is supported by relevant evidence (screenshots, market trends and consumer behaviour).
Excellent justification of objectives and strategies. Justification demonstrates exceptional understanding of relevant objectives and these are tied in well to strategies in formulating a rich rationale.
Justification of objectives and strategies. Justification demonstrates exceptional understanding of relevant objectives and these are tied in well to strategies in formulating a rich rationale.
80 / 100
Failure to cite credible academic sources. At times poor quality sources are used.
Very poor identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Fails to analyse the information with a view to developing fully justified interventions. Very limited evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion.
Poor identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Fails to analyse the information with a view to developing fully justified interventions. Limited evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion tends to be somewhat descriptive
Somewhat fair identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information with a view to developing justified interventions. Somewhat fair evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion
Fair identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information with a view to developing justified interventions. Fair evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion tends to be fairly critical in significant areas.
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
METRICS (10%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
Good identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information developing justified interventions. Good evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion develops
Very good identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information developing justified interventions. Good evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion develops very good critical analysis in significant areas.
Outstanding identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information developing justified interventions. Good evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion develops outstanding critical analysis.
Excellent identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information developing justified interventions. Good evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion develops excellent critical analysis.
Identification of relevant information and data related to the context. Achieves to analyse the information developing justified interventions. Good evidence of reading on some relevant Customer Management theories & literature for an informed and critical discussion. The discussion develops excellent critical analysis.
80 / 100
No indication of relevant metrics
Achieves to identify & define at least one metric
At least one relevant metrics are identified
Somewhat fair ability to identify & define of at least two metrics
Fair ability to identify & define at least three metrics.
Good identification & definition of at least three metrics.
Very good identification & definition of at least three metrics.
Outstanding identification & definition of at least 4 metrics
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
DISCUSSION (10%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
READERSHIP (10%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
Excellent identification & definition of five metrics.
Identification & definition of five metrics.
80 / 100
Metrics only listed without follow up discussion
Provides generalised discussion of metrics and this is not always applied effectively to the context.
Provides poor and descriptive evaluation of metrics and this is not always applied effectively to the context. Insufficiently developed & justified.
Provides somewhat fair metrics evaluation and this is supported to a very limited extent to context
Provides satisfactory metrics discussion and this is linked satisfactorily to context.
Good metrics discussion and this is linked well to context.
Very good metrics discussion and this is linked well to context.
Outstanding metrics discussion and this is linked well to context.
Excellent metrics discussion and this is linked well to context.
metrics discussion and this is linked well to context.
90 / 100
No citation No indication of relevant sources
Very poor identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Poor identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Somewhat fair identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Satisfactory identification of relevant sources to support discussion
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
MET LINK (5%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
CONCLUSION (10%)
FAIL (0)
Good identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Very good identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Outstanding identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Excellent identification of relevant sources to support discussion
Identification of relevant sources to support discussion
80 / 100
No link to any strategy.
Superficial link to strategy
Limited link to strategies provided
Somewhat fair link to strategies provided
Fair link to strategies provided
Provides good link to strategies
Provided very good link to at least two strategies
Provided outstanding link to at least three strategies
Excellent link to at least three strategies and these draw on ability to use multiple strategies/metrics. Extensive use of relevant Customer Management terminology throughout.
Link to at least three strategies and these draw on ability to use multiple strategies/metrics. Extensive use of relevant Customer Management terminology throughout.
90 / 100
Fails to provide any conclusion
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
ADMNISTRATIVE (5%)
FAIL (0)
VERY POOR (25)
POOR (35)
BARE PASS (40)
SATISFACTORY (50)
Does not draw good & key insights from report.
Limited insight drawn from report
Somewhat fair ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Fair ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Good ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Very good ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Demonstrates an outstanding ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Demonstrates an excellent ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
Ability to highlight how chosen telecommunications provider can benefit from digital CRM
90 / 100
No citations provided
Some sources used are not acknowledged in the text and reference list, using correct academic citation – including online sources. Limited communication, organisation and presentation of information. Fails to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Very poor referencing. Familiarise with Harvard referencing convention
Some errors in Harvard referencing . Poor communication, organisation and presentation of information. Fails to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Poor referencing. Familiarise with Harvard referencing convention
Somewhat fair referencing. Reasonable communication, organisation and presentation of information. Fails to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Reasonable referencing. Familiarise with Harvard referencing convention
Satisfactory referencing. Satisfactory communication, organisation and presentation of information. Satisfactorily and accurately communicates
GOOD (60)
VERY GOOD (70)
OUTSTANDING (80)
EXCELLENT (90)
DISTINCTION (100)
information using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Fair referencing. Familiarise with Harvard referencing convention
Good referencing. communication, organisation and presentation of information. Achieves to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Ability to relate theory to professional practice. Good referencing
Very good referencing, communication, organisation and presentation of information. Achieves to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Ability to relate theory to professional practice. Very good referencing
Outstanding referencing skills. Communication, organisation and presentation of information. Achieves to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Ability to relate theory to professional practice. Excellent good referencing
Excellent referencing skills, communication, organisation and presentation of information. Achieves to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Ability to relate theory to professional practice. Outstanding referencing
Referencing skills, communication, organisation and presentation of information. Achieves to communicate information appropriately and accurately using clear, accurate English, well organized and well presented, with flow and progression. Graduate skills- Graduate Employability Skills: Ability to relate theory to professional practice. Outstanding referencing