|
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)
|
|
(0) Unsatisfactory
|
(1) Needs Revision
|
(2) Satisfactory
|
|
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
|
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
|
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
|
|
Criterion Score: 2.00
|
|
A. Proof
|
|
(0) Unsatisfactory
|
(1) Needs Revision
|
(2) Satisfactory
|
|
The candidate does not accurately complete the appropriate proof using a 2-column proof format with statements on the left and reasons on the right.
|
The candidate accurately completes all but 1 to 2 steps of the appropriate proof using a 2-column proof format with statements on the left and reasons on the right.
|
The candidate accurately completes the appropriate proof using a 2-column proof format with statements on the left and reasons on the right.
|
|
Criterion Score: 1.00
Comments on this criterion: The submission included a two-column proof that was on the right track to show that triangle DGF is isosceles. The use of ASA was appropriate. Revisions are needed, though, to determine if some of the steps were necessary (e.g., steps 3 through 6) as well as to make sure that the supporting reasons are adequate (e.g., steps 2, 7, 9, and 10).
|
|
B. Sources
|
|
(0) Unsatisfactory
|
(1) Needs Revision
|
(2) Satisfactory
|
|
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and/or references for each source used.
|
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and/or references with major deviations from APA style.
|
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and/or references accurately or with only minor deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.
|
|
Criterion Score: 2.00
Comments on this criterion: No sources were cited.
|
steema1
rubric.docx
0
