This is for morga3166 (2nd)

profileibmles
revs_2.txt

RQLT Task 2 rev 2 Graph of the Equation - The candidate accurately graphs the equation, with limited detail. **Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: The graph has improved. The necessary descriptive labeling for each axis could not be located. Please revise the graph as needed. RQLT Task 3 rev 2 A3a2. Savings After 23 Months - The candidate does not accurately determine which plan yields the greatest balance if the person stops saving after 23 months **Criterion Score: 0.00 Comments on this criterion: Plan B is incorrect. A4. Relevant Quadrants - The candidate provides a logical explanation, with insufficient detail, of which quadrant(s) of the graph is(are) relevant. **Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: Quadrant 1 is correct. The current response lacks sufficient detail to meet the requirements for this question. QLT Task 5 rev 1 C. Graphical Representation of Cost Options - The candidate provides an accurate graphic depiction of the real-world problem, with no detail, using appropriate graphing software. **Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: The graph is correct but a descriptive label is required for the y-axis. D. Decision-Making Process - The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of a decision-making process that is based on both mathematical reasoning and non-financial, or situational, considerations. **Criterion Score: 1.00 Comments on this criterion: No decision-making process was described other than the statement that the "point where the two Plans will be equal (25, 300), after this point it will be better for Joe to choose Plan 300" but other factors may be necessary when determining the final customer recommendation. D1. Final Recommendation - The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the final recommendation that states the option that most closely meets the consumer’s financial needs and non-financial considerations. **Criterion Score: 0.00 Comments on this criterion: No clear and decisive final recommendation is evident in the work submitted. The recommendation should clearly meet the needs of the customer.