|
Category
|
Exemplary 20 Points
|
Satisfactory 18 Points
|
Developing 16 Points
|
Unsatisfactory 14 Points
|
Not Evident 12 Points
|
Score
|
|
Title Page
|
Title of the project
Candidates Name, Instructor’s Name,
Course Name,
Date, Neatly finished-no errors and is according to Dr. Z Writing Instructions
|
Evidence of 4
|
Evidence of3
|
Evidence of 2 or less
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Problem Statement
|
Clearly and concisely stated
the paper’s purpose in short
sentences, which is engaging,
and thought provoking and is innovative
|
Clearly states the paper’s
purpose in a single sentence.
|
States the paper’s purpose in a single sentence.
|
Incomplete and/or unfocused.
|
Absent, no
evidence
|
/20
|
|
Introduction
|
The introduction is engaging,
states the main topic and
previews the structure of the
paper.
|
The introduction states the
main topic and previews the
structure of the paper.
|
The introduction states the
main topic but does not
adequately preview the
structure of the paper.
|
There is no clear introduction
or main topic and the structure
of the paper is missing.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Body, heading and subheading
|
Each paragraph has thoughtful
supporting detail sentences
that develop the main idea with headings and subheadings
|
Each paragraph has sufficient
supporting detail sentences
that develop the main idea.
|
Each paragraph lacks
supporting detail sentences.
|
Each paragraph fails to
develop the main idea.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Organization-
Structural
Development of
the Idea
|
Author demonstrated logical
and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are
used to enhance organization.
|
Paragraph development
Present, and is logical.
|
Logical organization;
organization of ideas not fully developed.
|
No evidence of structure or organization.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Use of appropriate vocabulary and filed technical terminologies
|
Author applied 10 or more technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems. Author's writing demonstrated an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
|
Author applied 8 or more technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems
|
Author applied 6 or less technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems
|
Author applied 4 or less technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Conclusion
|
The conclusion is engaging
and addressed the thesis for the reader to fully understand the paper.
|
The conclusion addressed the thesis.
|
The conclusion does not
adequately address the thesis.
|
The conclusion is incomplete and/or ambiguous.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Grammar and punctuations
|
No errors in punctuation,
capitalization and spelling.
|
two or less errors in
punctuation, capitalization and spelling.
|
More than 3 errors in punctuation,
capitalization and spelling.
|
More than 6 and distracting
errors in punctuation,
capitalization and spelling.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Citation and References
|
All cited works, both text and
visual, are reported in the correct
APA format with no errors.
|
5 or more cited works, both text and visual, are reported in the correct APA format. Inconsistencies evident.
|
3 and less cited works, both text and visual, are reported in the correct APA format.
|
1 or less cited authors
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Bibliography
|
provided in the correct format
with no errors. Includes more
than 5 major references (e.g.
peer reviewed journal articles,
books, but no more than two
internet sites.
|
Provided in the correct format with 2 or less errors. Includes 5 major references (e.g. peer reviewed journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites.
|
Provided in the correct format with 4 or more errors. Includes 3 major references (e.g. peers journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites.
|
Provided in the correct format
with more than 5 errors. Includes 2 major references (e.g. peer reviewed journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites.
|
Absent, no evidence
|
/20
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
/200
|
sajeer
researchpaperrubric-30.docx
0
