for the writer Finance guru only
Semester 2 2017
ACCT5000 Intermediate Management Accounting
Marking Guide for Reports
Student Name: ________________________________________________________________ Student No: ______________________________
Use this sheet to prepare your report. Your tutor will use it to provide you with feedback and marks.
|
|
Below Expectations 0-4.9 |
Meets Expectations 5-5.9 |
Meets Expectations 6-6.9 |
Exceed Expectations 7-7.9 |
Exceed Expectations 8-10 |
|
Introduction (Max: 10)
|
The introduction does not identify the management accounting issues addressed and the purpose of the report is not communicated. |
The introduction provides insufficient information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is mentioned but not clearly expressed. |
The introduction provides some information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is briefly stated. |
The introduction provides sufficient information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is clearly stated. |
The introduction provides comprehensive information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is clearly stated. |
|
Identification of issues (DK1) (Max:10) |
• Inadequately identifies and analyses issues and problems. |
• Identifies and analyses the most significant issues and problems. |
• Identifies and analyses issues and problems with adequate reference to the interrelationships among the issues. |
• Identifies and analyses complex interrelationships among the issues and problems. |
• Identifies and analyses in-depth complex interrelationships among the issues and problems. |
|
Application of discipline knowledge (DK2) (Max:10)
|
• Discipline knowledge is poorly applied resulting in the management accounting issues and problems being not/unsatisfactorily resolved. |
• Discipline knowledge is poorly applied resulting in the management accounting issues and problems being incompletely resolved. |
• Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to problems and issues. |
• Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to issues and problems with satisfactory resolution. |
• Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to issues and problems with superior rationale, and resolution. |
|
|
Below Expectations 0-4.9 |
Meets Expectations 5-5.9 |
Meets Expectations 6-6.9 |
Exceed Expectations 7-7.9 |
Exceed Expectations 8-10 |
|
Conclusions and recommendations (DK3) (Max:10)
|
• The conclusions and recommendations are vague or non-existent . • Conclusions are not logically supported by the evidence and process of analysis. |
• The conclusions and recommendations are clear and relevant. • Few conclusions are generally supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. |
• The conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear and relevant. • Some conclusions are generally supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. |
• The conclusions and recommendations are relevant, significant and organized. • Most conclusions are logically supported by the evidence and/or the process of analysis. |
• The conclusions and recommendations are robust, comprehensive, relevant, significant and organized. • All conclusions are logically supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. |
|
Formatting: Presentation of submission, use of appropriate report structure and the Chicago Referencing style is used. (Max:10)
|
Presentation of submission is not structured as a report and does not meet submission requirements. Referencing is missing or significantly inconsistent with the Chicago referencing style. |
Presentation partially meets submission requirements; report structure partially met; but referencing is inconsistent with the Chicago referencing style. |
Presentation of submission meets most requirements and the structure of a report. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style. |
Presentation of submission meets all requirements and report is structured well. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style.
|
Submission is professionally presented and structured as a report. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style. |
Total marks: /50
Comments:
(The mark out of 50 will be weighted to 10% of the total unit mark i.e. REPORT MARK/50* 10)
Page 1 of 2