Constitutional Rights

grading_rubric.docx

Home >Law homework help >Constitutional Rights

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200	Assignment 2: Constitutional Rights
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Identify and discuss the four (4) elements of arrest. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the four (4) elements of arrest.	Insufficiently identified and discussed the four (4) elements of arrest.	Partially identified and discussed the four (4) elements of arrest.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed the four (4) elements of arrest.	Thoroughly identified and discussed the four (4) elements of arrest.
2. Identify and discuss the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant.	Insufficiently identified and discussed the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant.	Partially identified and discussed the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant.	Thoroughly identified and discussed the four (4) requirements for search and seizure with a warrant.
3. Explain the various aspects of the plain view doctrine. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely explained the various aspects of the plain view doctrine.	Insufficiently explained the various aspects of the plain view doctrine.	Partially explained the various aspects of the plain view doctrine.	Satisfactorily explained the various aspects of the plain view doctrine.	Thoroughly explained the various aspects of the plain view doctrine.
4. Compare and contrast the various means of identifying suspects. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the various means of identifying suspects.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted the various means of identifying suspects.	Partially compared and contrasted the various means of identifying suspects.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the various means of identifying suspects.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted the various means of identifying suspects.
5. Summarize the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial. Weight:15%	Did not submit or incompletely summarized the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.	Insufficiently summarized the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.	Partially summarized the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.	Satisfactorily summarized the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.	Thoroughly summarized the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.
6. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present