Discussion Responses Required
Discussion Board 1: Top United States Global Trading Partners
Liberty University
Corbin A. Weeks
BUSI 604-B14
Key Phrase
I have chosen to research the U.S.A’s Top Global Trading Partners because of the recent
attention brought to the subject by the President of the United States. I have always had a good
understanding of the importance regarding global trade, but with recent controversy, the trading
system as we know it may be completely changed on an international scale. I also teach Business
at Mulberry High School (FL), which is very diverse in culture and race. I want to make sure that
I provide my students with relevant and accurate information as they begin to enter the
workforce in different areas.
Explanation of the Key Phrase
Since the early 1930’s, the United States of America has steadily increased its global
commerce year after year. The United States Census Bureau collected data that shows
approximately 15 countries make up almost 75% of the American import/export business.
Among those 15 countries, Canada, China, and Mexico are the three top international commerce
partners. It is important to understand where products come from and how outsourcing plays a
crucial role in our economy. The three reasons international trade is important to the United
States are as follows: maximizing production and efficiency, increasing market audience, and
receiving foreign investment (Satterlee, 2014).
Major Article Summary
In the article China-US Trade: A Global Outlier, Willem Thorbecke analyzes the outlines
of the countries trade agreements. There has always been speculation around the trade deficit
with China that politicians and government officials just can not seem to understand. What most
people do not know is that between 2006 and 2014, the trade deficit with China actually
increased by 45% while the trade deficit between the United States and all other countries
decreased by 40% (Thorbecke, 2014, p.1). The main imports and exports that reflect these
numbers are oil and gas, agricultural products, and mechanical/electrical products. According to
the Office of the United States Trade Representative- Executive Office of the President, United
States exports with China were $169 billion, and imports totaled $479 billion. These numbers
reflect the differences in outsourcing, labor costs, advertising, and all of the driving forces that
people seek to save money. Every day American companies are sending their products overseas
because they can not afford production in the United States. Though working conditions and pay
are significantly lower in Asia, companies seek the maximum value of the dollar.
In the second part of the article, Willem Thorbecke uses a Gravity Model to explain
China’s exports. He explains how the trade flows are directly correlated with the GDP (Gross
Domestic Product), how trade costs are calculated, and even how a third country’s participation
will change the dynamic of the trade agreements financial structure. While digging through the
roots of the article, Willem Thorbecke made a crucial statement in regards to monetary gaps
between the United States and China, “This gap could reflect the role of global value chains,
since China imports parts and components from other East Asian countries and exports final
goods to the rest of the world” (p.1).
Discussion
The Chinese-United States trade deal surpasses any other global trade deal on an
international scale. Though the United States has many other trade partners, the Chinese are the
most popular amongst the American people. I remember growing up with toys that read “Made
in China” and even owning an American flag that read “Made in China”. This week, I really
wanted to focus my attention on a specific country that has a significant impact on everyday life.
A common topic of discussion in the American culture is the deficit that is owed to China, which
always intrigues me. We, as Americans, need to figure out ways to cut outsourcing and aim to
even the playing field with the imports/exports. This was the first time that I engaged in deeper
thought about the United States global trade partners and it really opened my mind up to question
what is to come in the future.
All of the works that I found seem to go hand in hand with one another. As previously
stated, I wanted to focus on the trade agreements with China as I began my research. Another
interesting factor that caught my attention was that China and the United States have been in a
legal battle for years with the laws of the World Trade Organization (WTO). I ponder how these
two nations have been fighting legal battles for so long, but continue to act in billion dollar trade
deals that create more deficit (Loridas, 2011). The other works cited make cases for the monetary
statistics between the two countries and where the trade deals are going. I feel that neither
country could function holistically without one another. With shortages of fruit, vegetation, food,
and other resources from Asia, I understand that the United States can not function on its own
domestic products.
References
Cherniak, Cyndee Todgham, et al. "Canada-United States trade policy beyond North America."
Canada-United States Law Journal, Spring 2010, p. 437. LegalTrac.
Clark, D. P. (2010). Intra-Industry Specialization in United States-Mexico Trade. Global Economy
Journal, 10(2). doi10.2202/1524-5861.1636
Loridas, K. (summer 2011). United States-China Trade War: Signs of Protectionism in a Globalized
Economy? Suffolk Transitional Law Review, 34.2 , 403.
Thorbecke, W. (2015). China–US trade: A global outlier. Journal of Asian Economics, 40, 47-58. doi:
10.1016/j.asieco.2015.09.001
Zeng, K. (2012). High stakes: United States-China trade disputes under the World Trade Organization.
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(1), 33-63. doi:10.1093/irap/lcs014