|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
25.0 % Historical/Cultural Significance, Meaning, and Impact CoT: 1.2
|
Essay does not provide an explanation for the historical/cultural significance, theological intent, and impact of the original Jesus metaphor/parable.
|
Essay provides an inadequate explanation for the historical/cultural significance, theological intent, and impact of the original Jesus metaphor/parable.
|
Essay provides a logical explanation for the historical/cultural significance, theological intent, and impact of the original Jesus metaphor/parable.
|
Essay clearly explains and provides supportive references for the historical/cultural significance, theological intent, and impact of the original Jesus metaphor/parable.
|
Essay thoroughly explains and provides relevant supportive references for the historical/cultural significance, theological intent, and impact of the original Jesus metaphor/parable.
|
|
|
15.0 % Translation of Metaphor for Contemporary Audience
|
Essay does not provide an explanation of how the changed metaphor/parable is faithful to the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God while being applicable for a contemporary audience.
|
Essay insufficiently explains how the changed metaphor/parable is faithful to the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God while being applicable for a contemporary audience.
|
Essay broadly explains how the changed metaphor/parable is faithful to the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God while being applicable for a contemporary audience.
|
Essay clearly explains how the changed metaphor/parable is faithful to the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God while being applicable for a contemporary audience.
|
Essay thoroughly explains how the changed metaphor/parable is faithful to the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God while being applicable for a contemporary audience.
|
|
|
15.0 % Characteristics of the Messianic Kingdom of God
|
Essay does not explain how the contemporary metaphor/parable communicates the characteristics of the Messianic kingdom of God as taught and modeled by Jesus.
|
Essay insufficiently explains how the contemporary metaphor/parable communicates the characteristics of the Messianic kingdom of God as taught and modeled by Jesus.
|
Essay accurately explains how the contemporary metaphor/parable communicates the characteristics of the Messianic kingdom of God as taught and modeled by Jesus.
|
Essay clearly explains how the contemporary metaphor/parable communicates the characteristics of the Messianic kingdom of God as taught and modeled by Jesus.
|
Essay thoroughly explains how the contemporary metaphor/parable communicates the characteristics of the Messianic kingdom of God as taught and modeled by Jesus.
|
|
|
15.0 % Communication the Translated Teaching in a Contemporary Setting
|
Essay does not describe how to communicate to a contemporary audience the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God.
|
Essay inaccurately describes how to communicate to a contemporary audience the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God.
|
Essay broadly describes how to communicate to a contemporary audience the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God.
|
Essay provides a sound description of how to communicate to a contemporary audience the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God.
|
Essay provides a detailed and well thought through description of how to communicate to a contemporary audience the teachings of Jesus on the kingdom of God.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
10.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
|
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
|
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
|
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
|
logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
|
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and appropriate style is usually correct.
|
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
|
|
|
100 % Total Weightage
|
|
|
boricuany2nc
rubric.docx
