3 pages analysis of interviews
|
This paper… |
5 = Excellent 1 = Poor or missing |
Comments: |
|
Clearly states purpose of paper: To analyze the results from the interviews (4 interviews) using at least ONE theory, concept, or model from the course *see last item of rubric below |
|
|
|
Outlines clear organization of paper in the introductory paragraph |
|
|
|
Demonstrates proper grammar, word usage and mechanics |
|
|
|
Overviews the demographic segments interviewed and interesting findings from the interviews (perhaps compares/contrasts them) |
|
|
|
Consistent in use of correct in-text citation formatting (all information is attributed to source(s) and author(s)) and a reference page (works cited) is included at end |
|
|
|
Explains and connects at least one course theory(ies), concept(s), or model(s) to the “findings” from the four interviews to help in analysis |
|
|
|
Shows understanding of at least one of the concepts, models, and theory(ies) discussed in class and in course readings |
|
|
|
Develops educated conclusions about the findings from the four interviews and explains how theory helps in understanding the findings |
|
|
|
Includes relevant facts and evidence to support conclusions, but avoids use of overly long quotes to replace critical thinking and analysis |
|
|
|
*Analysis helped the reader consider how and why people from different demographic segments may (or may not) share information and their level trust in their use of social networking sites |
|
|
|
Other notes: |
|
|