persuasive essay final
ENG 123: Assignment Two Grading Rubric
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Introduction: Overview |
|
Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument (100%) |
Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument but contains issues regarding accuracy (55%) |
Does not provide an overview of issue being analyzed (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Introduction: Thesis |
Meets "Proficient" criteria and thesis is exceptionally clear and concise (100%) |
Composes a thesis that states the argument that will be supported and proven throughout the essay (85%) |
Composes a thesis but contains issues related to clarity or relevancy (55%) |
Does not compose a thesis (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Body: Intent |
|
Writes multiple paragraphs that are focused, clearly state their intent, and build the thesis argument (100%) |
Writes multiple paragraphs but writing does not build the thesis argument (55%) |
Does not write multiple paragraphs (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Body: Body Paragraphs |
Meets "Proficient" criteria and supports argument with a masterfully-constructed combination of thoughts and evidence (100%) |
Body paragraphs communicate argument by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence (85%) |
Body paragraphs communicate argument but do not combine thoughts and ideas with evidence (55%) |
Does not communicate argument through body paragraphs (0%) |
45 |
|
Body: Opposing Viewpoints |
Meets "Proficient" criteria and demonstrates a keen insight of both sides of argument (100%) |
Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints in a way that strengthens the argument (85%) |
Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints but not in a way that strengthens the argument (55%) |
Does not address or refute opposing viewpoints (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Conclusion: Review |
Meets "Proficient" criteria and response is clear and contextualized (100%) |
Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points of essay (85%) |
Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points but contains issues regarding alignment to the intent of the thesis (55%) |
Does not review claim (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Conclusion: Insights |
Meets "Proficient" criteria and offers a nuanced insight into the relationship between the evidence and the claim (100%) |
Articulates insights about argument established through your analysis, following argument logically, referring to key points or quotes used to support argument (85%) |
Articulates insights about argument established through your essay, but does not follow argument logically or does not refer to key points or quotes used to support claim (55%) |
Does not articulate insights about argument (0%) |
7.5 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format (100%) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%) |
10 |
|
|
Earned Total |
100% |