Research Paper (APA STYLE) as soon as possible

profileosita92
10.10072fs00406-012-0292-0.pdf

O R I G I N A L P A P E R

Substance abuse and suicide risk among adolescents

Maurizio Pompili • Gianluca Serafini • Marco Innamorati • Massimo Biondi •

Alberto Siracusano • Massimo Di Giannantonio • Giancarlo Giupponi •

Mario Amore • David Lester • Paolo Girardi • Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler

Received: 9 August 2011 / Accepted: 10 January 2012 / Published online: 31 January 2012

� Springer-Verlag 2012

Abstract The aim of this paper was to review the liter-

ature concerning the relationship between suicide and

substance abuse behaviours among adolescents, focusing

on epidemiology, comorbidity and preventive programmes.

We performed a Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, PsycLit and

PsycInfo search to identify all papers and book chapters

during the period between 1980 and 2011. Adolescents

with substance abuse disorder who attempt or complete

suicide can be characterized as having mood disorders,

stressful life events, interpersonal problems, poor social

support, lonely lives and feelings of hopelessness. The

research supports the existence of a strong relationship

between suicide and substance abuse. Preventive pro-

grammes should be based on the detection of risk factors

associated with both suicide and substance abuse disorder.

Management programmes should combine different

therapeutic strategies such as peer-to-peer education,

school-based programmes, psychotherapy and pharmaco-

logical treatment. Evidence suggests that targeted suicide

prevention programmes can be delivered which reduce the

burden associated with substance abuse and suicide in

youths.

Keywords Drug abuse � Alcohol abuse � Suicide � Youths � Prevention

Introduction

Adolescence is a challenging period of cognitive, biologi-

cal, physiological and psychological transition, occurring

between 10 and 19 years of age [22]. The transition to

M. Pompili � G. Serafini � M. Innamorati � P. Girardi Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory

Functions, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital,

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

M. Pompili

McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA

M. Pompili (&) Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory

Organs—Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome,

1035-1039 Via di Grottarossa, 00189 Rome, Italy

e-mail: [email protected]

M. Biondi

Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine,

Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

A. Siracusano

Department of Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry,

University of Rome ‘‘Tor Vergata’’, Rome, Italy

M. Di Giannantonio

Neuroscience and Imaging Department, University of Chieti,

Chieti, Italy

G. Giupponi

Department of Psychiatry, Bolzano, Italy

M. Amore

Department of Neurosciences, Division of Psychiatry, University

of Parma, Parma, Italy

D. Lester

The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Pomona, NJ, USA

A. M. Möller-Leimkühler

Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University

of Munich, Munich, Germany

123

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

DOI 10.1007/s00406-012-0292-0

adolescence leads to needs for independence, identity for-

mation and acceptance by peers. All of these contribute to

risk-taking behaviours, suicidal ideation and suicidal

behaviour.

According to the World Health Organization [115],

suicide is the third leading cause of death among those

aged 15–24, after car accidents and cancer. Additionally,

suicide attempts represent the main reason for referral to

child and adolescent psychiatric emergency services [77].

Despite the fact that suicide mortality in middle-aged

and older persons has recently decreased in several Euro-

pean and North American countries, suicides among youths

have risen dramatically in recent decades [76], and

researchers have associated this increase in youth suicide

with the widespread use of alcohol and other drugs among

adolescents [7, 47, 112].

Both cross-sectional and retrospective evidence in ado-

lescent and adult populations have reported an association

between suicidal behaviours and substance use. Goldsmith

et al. [35] reported a rapid increase in drug abuse in the

USA in the years after 1960 especially in adolescents.

Adolescent suicidal behaviour also increased by about

300%. Substance using in adolescence has been proposed

as a relevant risk factor for suicidal behaviours [97]. Wines

et al. [114] found that 28% of inpatients in drug abuse

treatment centres had histories of suicidal ideation and 21%

had attempted suicide. Additionally, after 2 years of sub-

stance abuse treatment, 19% continued to have suicidal

ideation and 7% had made suicide attempts. It was also

suggested that the estimated risk for suicide in the presence

of alcohol-related disorders was about four times greater in

men and five times greater in women than in its absence

[100]. Shneider et al. [101] reported that alcohol-related

disorders (DSM-IV alcohol dependence) were more often

diagnosed in suicide victims than in controls (OR = 8.8,

95% CI 4.4–17.7).

Based on the existing literature, this systematic review

first aimed to investigate whether there is an association

between the substance use/abuse/dependence and suicidal

behaviour in clinical and non-clinical samples. Our second

aim was to ascertain whether substance use/abuse/depen-

dence may be considered as a specific risk factor for sui-

cide after controlling for a number of potentially

confounding factors.

Materials and methods

To achieve a high standard of reporting, we have adopted

‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and

Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) guidelines [69]. In order to

provide a new and timely systematic review of substance

abuse and suicidal behaviour, we performed a Pubmed/

Medline, Scopus, PsycLit and PsycInfo search to identify

all papers and book chapters during the period between

1980 and 2010. The search used the following terms:

(suicide OR suicide attempt OR ideation OR suicidal

behaviour) AND (epidemiology OR rates OR trends OR

incidence) AND (drug OR substance abuse OR drug abuse

OR substance disease OR comorbidity) AND (‘prevention’

OR ‘intervention’ OR ‘future implications’). Specifically,

in order to adequately focus on the specific field of interest,

the following search query was used in Pubmed: (suicid*

[TI] AND substanc* [TI]). This search in Medline gener-

ated 182 articles. The same search strategy was used in

Scopus rendering 4 additional articles and in PsycLit/Psy-

cInfo (specifying ‘suicide AND substance abuse’ and

deleting ‘[TI]’) providing 43 further articles. The reference

lists of the articles included in the review were manually

checked yielding 27 additional articles that might be

potentially considered for screening. The Pubmed, Scopus

and PsycLit/PsycInfo databases revealed a total of 151

potentially relevant articles after the removal of duplicates.

Figure 1 summarizes the search strategy used for selecting

studies (identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion

process).

Data collection

Only those articles published in peer-reviewed journals

were included. Where a title or abstract seemed to

describe a study eligible for inclusion, the full article was

obtained and examined to assess its relevance based on

the inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers con-

ducted a two-step literature search. Any discrepancies

between the two reviewers who, blind to each other,

examined the studies for the possible inclusion were

resolved by consultations with a senior author. Included

were all contributions that explicitly mention the associ-

ation between substance use and suicidal behaviour in

clinical and non-clinical (healthy) samples. Exclusion

criteria are the following: (1) studies including samples

with mean age [18 were excluded years; (2) studies published before 1980; (3) articles without abstracts or

abstracts that did not explicitly mention suicidal behav-

iour, substance use, abuse and dependence; (4) articles not

published in English language; and (5) articles having low

relevance to the main theme. Included papers were

restricted to those in English with the exception of one

Norwegian study [75] included in Table 1 because it was

considered to be of particular interest. All 151 articles

were critically evaluated: 24 of these were excluded

because they were not published in peer-reviewed jour-

nals, were without abstracts, had abstracts that did not

explicitly mention suicidal behaviour (suicidal attempts

and ideation) and substance abuse, and are articles with a

470 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

publication date before 1980. This left 127 full-text arti-

cles of which 110 articles were excluded because they

were not published in English language, had low rele-

vance to the main theme, included unclear data regarding

materials and method and number of patients analyzed.

Thus, 17 articles meeting our inclusion criteria were

included in the present review.

Data extraction

Data were independently collected by the two reviewers.

The following characteristics were extracted from the 17

included articles in Table 1: author/s and publication year,

study design, sample size, eventual follow-up, conclusions

and main risk factors.

The principal reviewer (MP) inspected all reports. Then,

three reviewers (MP, PG and GS) independently inspected

all citations of studies identified by the search and grouped

them according to the topic of the papers. Reviewers

acquired the full article for all papers located. Where dis-

agreement occurred, this was resolved by discussion with

MA who also with double-blind features inspected all

articles located and grouped them following the major

areas of interest identified by all authors. If doubt

remained, the study was put on the list of those awaiting

assessment, pending acquisition of more information. We

excluded from our analysis any studies vaguely reporting

on substance abuse in adolescence or using inadequate or

unclear diagnostic criteria for such disorders or those

inappropriately assessing the impact of substance abuse on

suicide risk. Results of this search are presented in the

paragraphs regarding the role of substance abuse in the

precipitation of suicide risk.

Summary measures

Studies were rated for quality using the following eligi-

bility criteria: (i) the representativeness of the sample

from the general population (0–2 points), (ii) the presence

of a control group (1 or 2 points), (iii) presence of follow-

up [1 year (1 or 2 points), (iv) evidence-based measures of assessment (e.g. the use of the SCID-I for the diagnosis

of the substance abuse/dependence or other psychometric

evaluation) (1 or 2 points), (v) the presence of two

independent raters who blindly diagnosed the substance

abuse/dependence (1 or 2 points), (vi) a statistical eval-

uation of the interrater reliability (1 or 2 points) and (vii)

evidence-based measures for assessing suicide or suicide

attempts (1 or 2 points). Quality ratings had 14 as the

maximum score.

Studies were differentiated in the following way: good

quality ([11 points)—most or all criteria being fulfilled, and where they were not met, the study conclusions were

thought very unlikely to alter; moderate quality (6–11

Fig. 1 Search strategy used for selecting studies (identification,

screening, eligibility, inclusion

in the systematic review)

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 471

123

T a

b le

1 R

e le

v a n

t st

u d

ie s

a b

o u

t su

b st

a n

c e

a b

u se

a n

d su

ic id

e ri

sk in

a d

o le

sc e n

ts a n

d y

o u

n g

a d

u lt

s

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

D a rk

e a n

d

R o

ss [2

4 ]

R e v

ie w

a rt

ic le

o n

su ic

id e

ra te

s,

su ic

id e

ri sk

fa c to

rs a n

d m

e th

o d

s

e m

p lo

y e d

fo r

su ic

id e

a m

o n

g

h e ro

in u

se rs

N o

t re

p o

rt e d

N o

H e ro

in u

se rs

a re

1 4

ti m

e s

m o

re li

k e ly

th a n

p e e rs

to d

ie fr

o m

su ic

id e .

T h

e y

a ls

o a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e m

o re

fr e q

u e n

tl y

th a n

th a t

o f

c o

m m

u n

it y

sa m

p le

s. R

is k

fa c to

rs fo

r su

ic id

e w

e re

p sy

c h

o p

a th

o lo

g y

, fa

m il

y d

y sf

u n

c ti

o n

a n

d so

c ia

l is

o la

ti o

n a s

w e ll

a s

p o

ly -

d ru

g u

se .

D ru

g s

b u

t n

o t

h e ro

in a s

a

m e th

o d

o f

su ic

id e

a p

p e a r

to p

la y

a

re le

v a n

t ro

le in

su ic

id e

a m

o n

g th

is

g ro

u p

1 .

P sy

c h

o p

a th

o lo

g y

2 .

F a m

il y

d y

sf u

n c ti

o n

3 .

S o

c ia

l is

o la

ti o

n

4 .

P o

ly -d

ru g

u se

I =

2

II =

2

II I

= 0

IV =

1

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 2

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 1

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

R o

y [9

4 ]

C a se

– c o

n tr

o l

st u

d y

c o

m p

a ri

n g

o p

ia te

-d e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts w

h o

h a d

a n

d h

a d

n o

t a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e

2 4

6 o

p ia

te -

d e p

e n

d e n

t

p a ti

e n

ts

N o

O n

e h

u n

d re

d o

f th

e 2

4 6

o p

ia te

-d e p

e n

d e n

t

p a ti

e n

ts h

a d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e ,

a n

d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

m o

re o

f th

e o

p ia

te -

d e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts w

h o

h a d

a tt

e m

p te

d

su ic

id e

h a d

a fa

m il

y h

is to

ry o

f b

o th

c o

m p

le te

d a n

d a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e .

O p

ia te

-d e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts w

h o

h a d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e re

p o

rt e d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

m o

re c h

il d

h o

o d

e m

o ti

o n

a l

a b

u se

,

p h

y si

c a l

a b

u se

, se

x u

a l

a b

u se

a n

d

e m

o ti

o n

a l

a n

d p

h y

si c a l

n e g

le c t.

M o

re o

v e r,

o p

ia te

-d e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts

w h

o h

a d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e w

e re

fo u

n d

to b

e si

g n

ifi c a n

tl y

m o

re in

tr o

v e rt

e d

,

h o

st il

e a n

d n

e u

ro ti

c .

F in

a ll

y ,

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

m o

re o

f th

e p

a ti

e n

ts w

h o

h a d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e w

e re

fe m

a le

a n

d

u n

e m

p lo

y e d

1 .

F a m

il y

h is

to ry

o f

b o

th c o

m p

le te

d a n

d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e

2 .

C h

il d

h o

o d

e m

o ti

o n

a l

a b

u se

3 .

C h

il d

h o

o d

p h

y si

c a l

a b

u se

4 .

C h

il d

h o

o d

se x

u a l

a b

u se

5 .

E m

o ti

o n

a l

a n

d

p h

y si

c a l

n e g

le c t

6 .

In tr

o v

e rs

io n

, h

o st

il it

y

a n

d n

e u

ro ti

c is

m .

7 .

B e in

g fe

m a le

a n

d

u n

e m

p lo

y e d

I =

2

II =

2

II I

= 0

IV =

1

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 2

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 1

G o

o d

q u

a li

ty

H a v

e n

s

e t

a l.

[4 2 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

st u

d y

in v

e st

ig a ti

n g

th e

re la

ti o

n sh

ip b

e tw

e e n

su ic

id a l

id e a ti

o n

w it

h in

je c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se rs

(I D

U s)

a n

d n

o n

-i n

je c ti

o n

d ru

g

u se

rs (N

ID U

s)

2 4

4 in

je c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se rs

a n

d 7

3 n

o n

-

in je

c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se rs

N o

S u

ic id

a l

id e a ti

o n

w a s

p re

se n

t in

2 7

% o

f

th e

ID U

p a ti

e n

ts v

s. 1

4 %

a m

o n

g th

e

N ID

U p

a ti

e n

ts ,

p =

0 .0

0 3

. A

ft e r

c o

n tr

o ll

in g

fo r

c o

n fo

u n

d in

g li

fe st

y le

fa c to

rs ,

in c lu

d in

g h

o m

e le

ss n

e ss

,

d e p

re ss

iv e

sy m

p to

m s

a n

d g

a y

/l e sb

ia n

/

b is

e x

u a l

id e n

ti ty

, th

e a ss

o c ia

ti o

n w

a s

n o

lo n

g e r

si g

n ifi

c a n

t. T

h e

p o

o r

so c io

p sy

c h

o lo

g ic

a l

b a c k

g ro

u n

d

(p sy

c h

ia tr

ic d

is o

rd e rs

, se

x u

a l

o ri

e n

ta ti

o n

, is

o la

ti o

n ),

w h

ic h

is

fr e q

u e n

t a m

o n

g in

je c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se rs

m a y

b e

re sp

o n

si b

le fo

r th

e in

c re

a se

d

su ic

id a l

id e a ti

o n

fo u

n d

in ID

U s

1 .

P sy

c h

ia tr

ic d

is o

rd e rs

2 .

S e x

u a l

o ri

e n

ta ti

o n

3 .

Is o

la ti

o n

I =

2

II =

2

II I

= 0

IV =

1

V =

0

V I

= 1

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

6

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

472 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

T a

b le

1 c o

n ti

n u

e d

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

K a ly

o n

c u

e t

a l.

[5 0 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

e x

a m

in a ti

o n

o f

th e

so c io

-d e m

o g

ra p

h ic

a n

d c li

n ic

a l

c h

a ra

c te

ri st

ic s

1 0

8 y

o u

n g

a d

u lt

h e ro

in -

d e p

e n

d e n

t

in p

a ti

e n

ts

N o

B o

th th

e fe

m a le

a n

d m

a le

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p te

rs w

e re

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

y o

u n

g e r

a t

th e

o n

se t

o f

h e ro

in u

se th

a n

th o

se

w h

o h

a d

n o

t a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e .

T h

e

st a rt

in g

a g

e o

f h

e ro

in u

se m

a y

b e

a ri

sk

fa c to

r fo

r su

ic id

e a tt

e m

p ts

. T

h e

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p te

rs h

a d

e x

p e ri

e n

c e d

g re

a te

r

fa m

il y

p sy

c h

o p

a th

o lo

g y

a n

d

d y

sf u

n c ti

o n

th a n

th e

n o

n -a

tt e m

p te

rs

a n

d h

a d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

h ig

h e r

sc o

re s

o n

th e

C h

il d

h o

o d

T ra

u m

a Q

u e st

io n

n a ir

e .

P re

v io

u s

tr a u

m a ti

c e x

p e ri

e n

c e s

a re

st ro

n g

ly a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h su

ic id

e

a tt

e m

p ts

in y

o u

n g

a d

u lt

h e ro

in -

d e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts .

In p

a rt

ic u

la r,

th e

m a le

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p te

rs m

o re

o ft

e n

m e t

th e

c ri

te ri

a fo

r d

e p

re ss

iv e ,

a n

x ie

ty a n

d

a n

ti so

c ia

l p

e rs

o n

a li

ty d

is o

rd e rs

1 .

Y o

u n

g e r

a g

e

2 .

T h

e st

a rt

in g

a g

e o

f

h e ro

in u

se

3 .

F a m

il y

p sy

c h

o p

a th

o lo

g y

a n

d

d y

sf u

n c ti

o n

4 .

C h

il d

h o

o d

tr a u

m a ti

c

e x

p e ri

e n

c e s

5 .

D e p

re ss

iv e

d is

o rd

e r

6 .

A n

x ie

ty d

is o

rd e r

7 .

A n

ti so

c ia

l

p e rs

o n

a li

ty d

is o

rd e r

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

2

V =

1

V I

= 2

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

7

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

M a rz

u k

e t

a l.

[6 3 ]

In d

iv id

u a l

re v

ie w

o f

a u

to p

sy a n

d

to x

ic o

lo g

ic a l

re c o

rd s

N o

t re

p o

rt e d

N o

T h

e p

re v

a le

n c e

o f

c o

c a in

e u

se a m

o n

g

y o

u n

g H

is p

a n

ic m

a le

s w

h o

c o

m m

it te

d

su ic

id e

w a s

4 5

% .

P e rs

o n

s w

h o

w e re

y o

u n

g ,

b la

c k

o r

H is

p a n

ic a n

d w

h o

h a d

u se

d a lc

o h

o l

im m

e d

ia te

ly b

e fo

re th

e

fa ta

l in

ju ry

w e re

m o

st li

k e ly

to h

a v

e

b e e n

re c e n

t c o

c a in

e u

se rs

. A

ft e r

c o

n tr

o ll

in g

fo r

d e m

o g

ra p

h ic

v a ri

a b

le s

a n

d a lc

o h

o l

u se

, su

b je

c ts

w h

o

c o

m m

it te

d su

ic id

e w

it h

fi re

a rm

s w

e re

tw ic

e a s

li k

e ly

to h

a v

e u

se d

c o

c a in

e a s

th o

se w

h o

u se

d o

th e r

m e th

o d

s

1 .

C o

c a in

e u

se

2 .

Y o

u n

g e r

a g

e

3 .

B la

c k

o r

H is

p a n

ic

ra c e

4 .

A lc

o h

o l

c o

n su

m p

ti o

n

im m

e d

ia te

ly b

e fo

re

th e

fa ta

l in

ju ry

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

0

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

6

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

R o

y [9

3 ]

C a se

– c o

n tr

o l

st u

d y

2 1

4 c o

c a in

e -

d e p

e n

d e n

t

p a ti

e n

ts

N o

3 9

% o

f th

e c o

c a in

e -d

e p

e n

d e n

t p

a ti

e n

ts

h a d

a tt

e m

p te

d su

ic id

e a t

so m

e ti

m e

in

th e ir

li v

e s,

m o

re o

ft e n

h a d

a fa

m il

y

h is

to ry

o f

su ic

id a l

b e h

a v

io u

r a n

d

re p

o rt

e d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

m o

re c h

il d

h o

o d

tr a u

m a .

T h

e y

a ls

o h

a d

h ig

h e r

p e rs

o n

a li

ty sc

o re

s fo

r in

tr o

v e rs

io n

,

n e u

ro ti

c is

m a n

d h

o st

il it

y ;

th e y

h a d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

m o

re c o

m o

rb id

it y

w it

h th

e

u se

o f

o th

e r

su b

st a n

c e s,

a s

w e ll

a s

p sy

c h

ia tr

ic a n

d p

h y

si c a l

d is

o rd

e rs

1 .

F a m

il y

h is

to ry

o f

su ic

id a l

b e h

a v

io u

r

2 .

C h

il d

h o

o d

tr a u

m a

3 .

In tr

o v

e rs

io n

,

n e u

ro ti

c is

m a n

d

h o

st il

it y

4 .

P sy

c h

ia tr

ic d

is o

rd e rs

5 .

P h

y si

c a l

d is

o rd

e rs

I =

2

II =

2

II I

= 0

IV =

2

V =

0

V I

= 2

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

8

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 473

123

T a

b le

1 c o

n ti

n u

e d

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

W a ld

ro p

e t

a l.

[1 1

1 ]

N a ti

o n

a l

c ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

S u

rv e y

o f

A d

o le

sc e n

ts

2 0

0 2

a d

o le

sc e n

ts

(a g

e d

1 2

– 1

7 )

N o

S a m

p le

p re

v a le

n c e s

o f

su ic

id a l

id e a ti

o n

a n

d a tt

e m

p ts

w e re

2 4

.3 a n

d 3

.3 %

,

re sp

e c ti

v e ly

, y

ie ld

in g

w e ig

h te

d

p o

p u

la ti

o n

p re

v a le

n c e

e st

im a te

s o

f 2

3 .3

a n

d 3

.1 %

. S

u ic

id a l

id e a ti

o n

w a s

p o

si ti

v e ly

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h fe

m a le

g e n

d e r,

a g

e ,

fa m

il y

, a lc

o h

o l

a n

d d

ru g

p ro

b le

m s,

v io

le n

c e

e x

p o

su re

, li

fe ti

m e

d e p

re ss

io n

a n

d P

T S

D .

S u

ic id

e a tt

e m

p ts

w e re

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h fe

m a le

g e n

d e r,

a g

e ,

se x

u a l

a n

d p

h y

si c a l

a ss

a u

lt ,

li fe

ti m

e su

b st

a n

c e

a b

u se

o r

d e p

e n

d e n

c e ,

P T

S D

a n

d d

e p

re ss

io n

1 .

P sy

c h

o p

a th

o lo

g y

2 .

F e m

a le

g e n

d e r

3 .

A g

e

4 .

S e x

u a l

a n

d p

h y

si c a l

a ss

a u

lt s

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

0

V =

1

V I

= 2

V II

= 1

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

6

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

G a rl

o w

[3 3 ];

G a rl

o w

e t

a l.

[3 4 ]

R e tr

o sp

e c ti

v e

a n

a ly

si s

o f

re c o

rd s

o f

th e

O ffi

c e

o f

th e

M e d

ic a l

E x

a m

in e r

o f

a ll

c o

m p

le te

d

su ic

id e s

4 1

6 c o

c a in

e

u se

rs

N o

A lm

o st

a ll

(9 4

.6 %

) o

f th

e su

ic id

e s

in

w h

o m

c o

c a in

e w

a s

d e te

c te

d w

e re

m a le

, 5

1 .4

% o

f th

e c o

c a in

e -p

o si

ti v

e

su ic

id e s

w e re

A fr

ic a n

A m

e ri

c a n

m e n

a n

d 4

3 .2

% w

e re

w h

it e

m e n

. M

o st

(8 6

.7 %

) o

f A

fr ic

a n

A m

e ri

c a n

te e n

a g

e rs

d id

n o

t u

se su

b st

a n

c e s

b e fo

re c o

m m

it ti

n g

su ic

id e ,

w h

e re

a s

5 0

.0 %

o f

th e

w h

it e

te e n

a g

e

v ic

ti m

s h

a d

u se

d o

n e

o r

b o

th

su b

st a n

c e s,

w it

h 4

1 .7

% o

f th

e w

h it

e

te e n

a g

e rs

h a v

in g

u se

d e th

a n

o l.

E th

a n

o l

u se

w a s

m u

c h

m o

re

c o

m m

o n

a m

o n

g w

h it

e v

ic ti

m s

o f

a ll

a g

e g

ro u

p s

1 .

B e in

g m

a le

2 .

Y o

u n

g e r

a g

e

3 .

B e in

g w

h it

e o

r

A fr

ic a n

A m

e ri

c a n

4 .

C o

c a in

e o

r e th

a n

o l

d e te

c te

d a t

a u

to p

sy

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

0

V =

2

V I

= 0

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

4

L o

w q

u a li

ty

In n

a m

o ra

ti

e t

a l.

[4 8 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

st u

d y

3 4

0 y

o u

n g

a d

u lt

s

N o

1 4

.7 %

w e re

d ru

g u

se rs

a n

d 2

4 .1

%

d ri

n k

e rs

. A

lc o

h o

l a n

d d

ru g

m is

u se

w a s

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h re

a so

n s

fo r

li v

in g

, h

o p

e le

ss n

e ss

, su

ic id

a l

a tt

it u

d e s

a n

d d

e p

re ss

io n

. A

ft e r

m u

lt ip

le

re g

re ss

io n

a n

a ly

si s,

th e

D ru

g A

b u

se

S c re

e n

in g

T e st

, th

e Z

u n

g D

e p

re ss

io n

S c a le

a n

d L

o ss

o f

M o

ti v

a ti

o n

w e re

p o

si ti

v e

p re

d ic

to rs

o f

su ic

id e

ri sk

w it

h S

u rv

iv a l

a n

d C

o p

in g

B e li

e fs

a s

n e g

a ti

v e

p re

d ic

to rs

. C

a n

n a b

is

m a y

b e

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h ri

sk y

h e a lt

h b

e h

a v

io u

r

1 .

A lc

o h

o l

a n

d d

ru g

m is

u se

2 .

H ig

h e r

sc o

re s

o n

th e

Z u

n g

D e p

re ss

io n

S c a le

3 .

L o

ss o

f m

o ti

v a ti

o n

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

2

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 2

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 0

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

474 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

T a

b le

1 c o

n ti

n u

e d

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

B e a u

tr a is

e t

a l.

[2 ]

C a se

– c o

n tr

o l

st u

d y

3 0

2 c a se

s v

s.

1 ,0

2 8

c o

n tr

o ls

N o

S u

b je

c ts

w h

o h

a d

m a d

e se

ri o

u s

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p ts

h a d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

h ig

h e r

ra te

s

o f

c a n

n a b

is a b

u se

/d e p

e n

d e n

c e

th a n

c o

m p

a ri

so n

su b

je c ts

p re

su m

a b

ly

re la

te d

to th

e so

c io

-d e m

o g

ra p

h ic

d is

a d

v a n

ta g

e s

a n

d d

is a d

v a n

ta g

e d

c h

il d

h o

o d

fa m

il y

c ir

c u

m st

a n

c e s.

A ft

e r

c o

n tr

o ll

in g

fo r

c o

n fo

u n

d in

g fa

c to

rs a n

d

c o

m o

rb id

p sy

c h

ia tr

ic d

is o

rd e r,

th e

o d

d s

ra ti

o b

e tw

e e n

c a n

n a b

is a b

u se

/

d e p

e n

d e n

c e

a n

d m

a k

in g

a se

ri o

u s

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p t

w a s

2 .0

a n

d o

n ly

m a rg

in a ll

y st

a ti

st ic

a ll

y si

g n

ifi c a n

t

1 .

C a n

n a b

is a b

u se

/

d e p

e n

d e n

c e

2 .

S o

c io

-d e m

o g

ra p

h ic

d is

a d

v a n

ta g

e d

c h

il d

h o

o d

fa m

il y

c ir

c u

m st

a n

c e s

3 .

C o

m o

rb id

m o

o d

d is

o rd

e r,

o th

e r

su b

st a n

c e

u se

d is

o rd

e r

a n

d a n

ti so

c ia

l

p e rs

o n

a li

ty d

is o

rd e r

I =

2

II =

2

II I

= 0

IV =

2

V =

1

V I

= 2

V II

= 1

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 0

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

F e rg

u ss

o n

e t

a l.

[3 2 ]

2 1

-y e a r

lo n

g it

u d

in a l

st u

d y

1 ,2

6 5

a d

o le

sc e n

c e /

y o

u n

g a d

u lt

s

F ir

st

e v

a lu

a ti

o n

= a t

b ir

th

T 1

= 4

m o

n th

s

T 2

= 1

y e a r

T 3

= a n

n u

a l

in te

rv a ls

u p

to

a g

e 1

6 y

e a rs

T 4

= a t

a g

e

1 8

y e a rs

T 5

= a t

2 1

y e a rs

R e g

u la

r c a n

n a b

is u

se w

a s

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h

a d

ra m

a ti

c in

c re

a se

in th

e ri

sk o

f o

th e r

il li

c it

d ru

g u

se ,

e v

e n

w h

e n

c o

n fo

u n

d in

g

v a ri

a b

le s

w e re

ta k

e n

in to

a c c o

u n

t. In

a d

d it

io n

, re

g u

la r

c a n

n a b

is a b

u se

w a s

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h in

c re

a se

s in

d e li

n q

u e n

c y

, d

e p

re ss

io n

a n

d su

ic id

a l

b e h

a v

io u

r. T

h e

a d

v e rs

e e ff

e c ts

o f

c a n

n a b

is o

n a d

ju st

m e n

t se

e m

e d

to b

e

m o

st p

ro n

o u

n c e d

fo r

y o

u n

g e r

u se

rs a n

d

d e c li

n e d

w it

h in

c re

a si

n g

a g

e

1 .

C a n

n a b

is u

se

2 .

Y o

u n

g e r

a g

e

3 .

D e li

n q

u e n

c y

in

c a n

n a b

is u

se rs

4 .

D e p

re ss

io n

in

c a n

n a b

is u

se rs

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 2

IV =

2

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 2

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 2

G o

o d

q u

a li

ty

R e y

e t

a l.

[8 9 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

st u

d y

1 ,2

6 1

a d

o le

sc e n

ts

u si

n g

c a n

n a b

is

N o

1 /4

o f

th e

sa m

p le

re p

o rt

e d

h a v

in g

u se

d

c a n

n a b

is a n

d m

a le

s w

e re

tw ic

e a s

li k

e ly

a s

fe m

a le

s to

h a v

e u

se d

c a n

n a b

is b

e fo

re

th e

a g

e o

f 1

3 .

A n

a ss

o c ia

ti o

n b

e tw

e e n

d e p

re ss

io n

a n

d c a n

n a b

is u

se w

a s

fo u

n d

.

C a n

n a b

is u

se in

c re

a se

d th

e in

c id

e n

c e

o f

d is

ru p

ti v

e b

e h

a v

io u

rs su

c h

a s

c o

n d

u c t

p ro

b le

m s,

to b

a c c o

sm o

k in

g ,

e x

c e ss

iv e

d ri

n k

in g

a n

d th

e u

se o

f il

li c it

d ru

g s

1 .

B e in

g m

a le

2 .

D e p

re ss

io n

3 .

C o

n d

u c t

p ro

b le

m s,

to b

a c c o

sm o

k in

g ,

e x

c e ss

iv e

d ri

n k

in g

a n

d e x

c e ss

iv e

u se

o f

il li

c it

d ru

g s

in

c a n

n a b

is u

se rs

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

2

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

8

M o

d e ra

te

q u

a li

ty

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 475

123

T a

b le

1 c o

n ti

n u

e d

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

C h

a b

ro l

e t

a l.

[1 8 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

st u

d y

2 4

8 h

ig h

sc h

o o

l

st u

d e n

ts

N o

T h

o se

w h

o h

a d

u se

d c a n

n a b

is a t

le a st

o n

c e

in th

e la

st si

x m

o n

th s

h a d

si g

n ifi

c a n

tl y

h ig

h e r

ra te

s o

f su

ic id

a l

b e h

a v

io u

r, d

e p

re ss

io n

sy m

p to

m s

a n

d

a n

x ie

ty sy

m p

to m

s c o

m p

a re

d to

n o

n -

u se

rs .

C a n

n a b

is u

se a p

p e a re

d to

b e

a n

in d

e p

e n

d e n

t p

re d

ic to

r o

f su

ic id

a l

b e h

a v

io u

r a ft

e r

c o

n tr

o ll

in g

fo r

d e p

re ss

io n

a n

d a n

x ie

ty sy

m p

to m

s

1 .

C a n

n a b

is u

se

2 .

D e p

re ss

io n

sy m

p to

m s

a n

d a n

x ie

ty

sy m

p to

m s

in c a n

n a b

is

u se

rs

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

1

V =

0

V I

= 0

V II

= 2

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

5

L o

w q

u a li

ty

E p

st e in

a n

d

S p

ir it

o

[3 0 ]

C ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

st u

d y

1 3

,9 1

7 h

ig h

sc h

o o

l

st u

d e n

ts

N o

E a rl

y a lc

o h

o l

o n

se t,

h a v

in g

h a d

se x

b e fo

re a g

e 1

3 ,

in je

c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se a n

d

b e in

g fo

rc e d

to h

a v

e se

x w

e re

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h su

ic id

a li

ty a c ro

ss

g e n

d e r.

S m

o k

in g

in g

ir ls

w a s

a ss

o c ia

te d

w it

h m

a k

in g

a p

la n

to

a tt

e m

p t

su ic

id e

a n

d a c tu

a l

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p ts

. F

ig h

ti n

g w

a s

re la

te d

to

su ic

id a li

ty fo

r g

ir ls

, w

h il

e fi

g h

ti n

g in

sc h

o o

l w

a s

re la

te d

to su

ic id

a li

ty fo

r

b o

y s

1 .

E a rl

y a lc

o h

o l

o n

se t

2 .

H a v

in g

h a d

se x

b e fo

re a g

e 1

3

3 .

In je

c ti

o n

d ru

g u

se

4 .

B e in

g fo

rc e d

to h

a v

e

se x

5 .

S m

o k

in g

in g

ir ls

6 .

F ig

h ti

n g

fo r

g ir

ls a n

d

fi g

h ti

n g

in sc

h o

o l

fo r

b o

y s

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 0

IV =

1

V =

0

V I

= 2

V II

= 0

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

5

L o

w q

u a li

ty

P ri

c e

e t

a l.

[8 6 ]

L o

n g

it u

d in

a l

st u

d y

to g

e th

e r

w it

h a

c ro

ss -s

e c ti

o n

a l

in v

e st

ig a ti

o n

u si

n g

th e

N a ti

o n

a l

C a u

se o

f D

e a th

R e g

is te

r to

c o

rr e c tl

y id

e n

ti fy

6 0

0

su ic

id e s

a n

d u

n d

e te

rm in

e d

d e a th

s

5 0

,0 8

7 m

a le

m il

it a ry

c o

n sc

ri p

ts

3 3

-y e a r

fo ll

o w

-u p

5 ,3

8 0

(1 0

.7 %

) o

f su

b je

c ts

a d

m it

te d

to

h a v

in g

u se

d c a n

n a b

is w

h il

e 4

1 ,3

9 4

(8 2

.6 %

) h

a d

n o

t. T

h e

a ss

o c ia

ti o

n

b e tw

e e n

c a n

n a b

is u

se a n

d ri

sk fo

r

su ic

id e

w a s

p re

se n

t u

si n

g a

c ru

d e

a n

a ly

si s

(c ru

d e

O R

fo r

‘e v

e r

u se

’ 1

.6 2

,

9 5

% C

I 1

.2 8

– 2

.0 7

), b

u t

a ft

e r

a d

ju st

m e n

t fo

r so

c ia

l a n

d p

e rs

o n

a l

fa c to

rs ,

th e y

fa il

e d

to c o

n fi

rm th

e

in c re

a se

d ri

sk fo

r su

ic id

e in

c a n

n a b

is

u se

rs (a

d ju

st e d

O R

= 0

.8 8

, 9

5 %

C I

0 .6

5 –

1 .2

0 ).

A si

g n

ifi c a n

t a ss

o c ia

ti o

n

w a s

fo u

n d

b e tw

e e n

th e

u se

o f

o th

e r

d ru

g s,

in st

e a d

o f

c a n

n a b

is ,

w it

h

u n

d e te

rm in

e d

d e a th

s (a

d ju

st e d

O R

= 2

.0 6

, 9

5 %

C I

1 .1

1 –

3 .8

0 )

b u

t n

o t

w it

h d

e fi

n it

e su

ic id

e s

(a d

ju st

e d

O R

= 1

.1 3

, 9

5 %

C I

0 .7

3 –

1 .7

5 )

1 .

U se

o f

o th

e r

d ru

g s

th a n

c a n

n a b

is

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 2

IV =

2

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 1

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 1

G o

o d

q u

a li

ty

476 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

T a

b le

1 c o

n ti

n u

e d

S tu

d y

D e si

g n

S a m

p le

si z e

E v

e n

tu a l

fo ll

o w

-u p

C o

n c lu

si o

n s

M a in

ri sk

fa c to

rs Q

u a li

ty

sc o

re

Q u

a li

ty

d if

fe re

n ti

a ti

o n

P e d

e rs

e n

[7 5 ]

L o

n g

it u

d in

a l

st u

d y

2 0

3 3

y o

u n

g

a d

u lt

s

1 3

-y e a r

fo ll

o w

-u p

N o

a ss

o c ia

ti o

n b

e tw

e e n

e a rl

y

a d

o le

sc e n

c e ,

su ic

id a li

ty a n

d la

te r

d e p

re ss

io n

, w

h il

e in

th e

g ro

u p

in th

e ir

tw e n

ti e s,

a h

ig h

ly si

g n

ifi c a n

t

a ss

o c ia

ti o

n w

a s

fo u

n d

b e tw

e e n

c a n

n a b

is u

se ,

su ic

id e

id e a ti

o n

a n

d

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p ts

e v

e n

a ft

e r

c o

n tr

o ll

in g

fo r

c o

n fo

u n

d in

g fa

c to

rs .

S u

b je

c ts

w h

o

h a d

u se

d c a n

n a b

is 1

1 ?

ti m

e s

d u

ri n

g

th e

p a st

1 2

m o

n th

s h

a d

a n

O R

fo r

la te

r

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p ts

o f

2 .9

(9 5

% C

I

1 .3

– 6

.1 )

a n

d fo

r su

ic id

a l

id e a ti

o n

a n

O R

o f

2 .7

(9 5

% C

I 2

.8 –

6 .4

)

1 .

C a n

n a b

is u

se

2 .

Y o

u n

g e r

a g

e

I =

2

II =

0

II I

= 2

IV =

2

V =

2

V I

= 2

V II

= 1

T o

ta l

sc o

re =

1 1

G o

o d

q u

a li

ty

S tu

d ie

s w

e re

ra te

d fo

r q

u a li

ty u

si n

g th

e fo

ll o

w in

g e li

g ib

il it

y c ri

te ri

a :

(i )

th e

re p

re se

n ta

ti v

e n

e ss

o f

th e

sa m

p le

fr o

m th

e g

e n

e ra

l p

o p

u la

ti o

n (0

– 1

p o

in ts

); (i

i) th

e p

re se

n c e

o f

a c o

n tr

o l

g ro

u p

(1 o

r 2

p o

in ts

); (i

ii )

p re

se n

c e

o f

fo ll

o w

-u p [

1 y

e a r

(0 –

2 p

o in

ts );

(i v

) e v

id e n

c e -b

a se

d m

e a su

re s

o f

a ss

e ss

m e n

t (e

.g .

th e

u se

o f

th e

S C

ID -I

fo r

th e

d ia

g n

o si

s o

f th

e su

b st

a n

c e

a b

u se

/d e p

e n

d e n

c e

o r

o th

e r

p sy

c h

o m

e tr

ic e v

a lu

a ti

o n

) (0

– 2

p o

in ts

); (v

) th

e p

re se

n c e

o f

tw o

in d

e p

e n

d e n

t ra

te rs

w h

o b

li n

d ly

d ia

g n

o se

d th

e su

b st

a n

c e

a b

u se

/d e p

e n

d e n

c e

(0 –

2 p

o in

ts );

(v i)

a st

a ti

st ic

a l

e v

a lu

a ti

o n

o f

th e

in te

rr a te

r re

li a b

il it

y (0

– 2

p o

in ts

); (v

ii )

e v

id e n

c e -b

a se

d m

e a su

re s

fo r

a ss

e ss

in g

su ic

id e

o r

su ic

id e

a tt

e m

p ts

(0 –

2 p

o in

ts ).

Q u

a li

ty ra

ti n

g s

h a d

1 4

a s

th e

m a x

im u

m sc

o re

S tu

d ie

s w

e re

d if

fe re

n ti

a te

d in

th e

fo ll

o w

in g

w a y

: (1

) g

o o

d q

u a li

ty (B

1 1

p o

in ts

)— m

o st

o r

a ll

c ri

te ri

a b

e in

g fu

lfi ll

e d

, a n

d w

h e re

th e y

w e re

n o

t m

e t,

th e

st u

d y

c o

n c lu

si o

n s

w e re

th o

u g

h t

v e ry

u n

li k

e ly

to a lt

e r;

(2 )

m o

d e ra

te q

u a li

ty (6

– 1

1 p

o in

t) —

so m

e c ri

te ri

a b

e in

g fu

lfi ll

e d

, a n

d w

h e re

th e y

w e re

n o

t m

e t,

th e

st u

d y

c o

n c lu

si o

n s

w e re

th o

u g

h t

u n li

k e ly

to a lt

e r;

a n

d (3

) lo

w q

u a li

ty (B

5

p o

in ts

)— fe

w c ri

te ri

a w

e re

fu lfi

ll e d

, a n

d th

e c o

n c lu

si o

n s

o f

th e

st u

d y

w e re

th o

u g

h t

v e ry

li k

e ly

to a lt

e r.

C a u

ti o

n w

a s

re q

u ir

e d

in in

te rp

re ti

n g

th e

re su

lt s

o f

th e se

tr ia

ls

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 477

123

points)—some criteria being fulfilled, and where they were

not met, the study conclusions were thought unlikely to

alter; and low quality ([5 points)—few criteria were ful- filled, and the conclusions of the study were thought very

likely to alter. Caution was required in interpreting the

results of these trials.

Results

According to our quality score system, the mean quality

score of the 17 studies that were included is of 7.7 points.

Based on quality differentiation, most of studies (ten)

resulted of moderate quality, four contributions were

judged of good quality and three of low quality,

respectively.

Suicide risk in alcohol users/abusers

Some of the studies included showed an association

between alcohol use disorders and suicidal risk (Table 1).

Rey et al. [89] in a cross-sectional study on 1,261 adoles-

cents with cannabis use found a close relationship between

cannabis use and excessive drinking plus cannabis use

increasing the incidence of disruptive behaviours.

Garlow [33] and Garlow et al. [34] in a retrospective

analysis found that ethanol use was much more common

among white completed suicides of all age groups. The

authors reported that 50.0% of the white teenage victims

had used ethanol or cocaine alone or both ethanol and

cocaine, with most of them (41.7%) having used predom-

inantly ethanol.

In 2008, Innamorati et al. [48] performed a cross-sec-

tional study of 340 young adults and reported that 24.1%

were drinkers. Alcohol misuse was significantly associated

with reasons for living, hopelessness, suicidal attitudes and

depression. After multiple regression analysis, the Drug

Abuse Screening Test was a positive predictor of suicide

risk.

Epstein and Spirito [30] in a cross-sectional study on

13,917 high school students later reported that early alco-

hol use onset was significantly associated with suicidality

across gender.

Suicide risk in other substance users/abusers

Several other studies showed an association between sub-

stance use disorders (SUD) and suicidal risk. Beautrais

et al. [2] in a case–control study on 302 cases versus 1,028

controls found that subjects who had made serious suicide

attempts had significantly higher rates of cannabis abuse/

dependence than comparison subjects presumably due to

the socio-demographic disadvantages and to childhood

adverse family circumstances. After controlling for con-

founding factors, the odds ratio between cannabis abuse/

dependence and making a serious suicide attempt was 2.0.

Fergusson et al. [32], in a 21-year longitudinal study con-

ducted on a sample of 1,265 adolescence/young adults,

reported that regular cannabis use was associated with a

increased risk of other illicit drug use, increases in delin-

quency, depression and suicidal behaviour.

Also, Rey et al. [89], in a cross-sectional study on 1,261

adolescents, have found that 25% reported having used

cannabis and males were twice as likely as females to

have used cannabis before the age of 13. Additionally, an

association between depression and cannabis use was

reported.

Pedersen [75], in a 13-year follow-up study conducted in

a sample of 2,033 young adults, found a highly significant

association between cannabis use, suicide ideation and

suicide attempts even after controlling for confounding

factors. Subjects who had used cannabis 11 times or more

during the past 12 months had an OR of 2.9 for later sui-

cide attempts and an OR of 2.7 for suicidal ideation.

However, not all studies included in the present review

reported a positive correlation between cannabis use and

suicidal risk. Price et al. [86], in a 33-year follow-up study

conducted together with a cross-sectional investigation

using the National Cause of Death Register on 50,087 male

military conscripts, reported that after adjustment for social

and personal confounding factors, the increased risk for

suicide was not confirmed in cannabis users (adjusted

OR = 0.88). They instead suggested that a significant

association exists between the use of other additional

drugs, instead of cannabis, and undetermined deaths

(adjusted OR = 2.06) but not definite suicides (adjusted

OR = 1.13).

Some studies have reported an association between

heroin/opiate-dependent patients and suicidal risk. Darke

and Ross [24] wrote a review article on this topic finding

that heroin users are 14 times more likely than peers to die

from suicide. They also attempted suicide more frequently

than those in community samples.

Kalyoncu et al. [50], in a cross-sectional study of 108

young adult heroin-dependent inpatients, reported that both

the female and male suicide attempters were significantly

younger at the onset of heroin use compared to those who

had not attempted suicide. They concluded that the starting

age of heroin use may be a risk factor for suicide attempts.

Also, Roy [94], in a case–control study comparing 246

opiate-dependent patients who had and had not attempted

suicide, found that significantly more of the opiate-

dependent patients who had attempted suicide had a family

history of both completed and attempted suicide. Opiate-

dependent patients who had attempted suicide reported

significantly more childhood emotional, physical, sexual

478 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

abuse and emotional and physical neglect, and they were

predominantly female, unemployed, significantly more

introverted, hostile and neurotic.

Havens et al. [42] conducted a cross-sectional study

investigating the suicidal ideation in injection drug users

(IDUs). They investigated a sample of 244 injection drug

users and 73 non-injection drug users (NIDUs) finding

that suicidal ideation was present in 27% of the IDUs

versus 14% of the NIDUs. However, after controlling for

confounding factors, the association was no longer sig-

nificant. The authors suggested that psychiatric disorders,

sexual orientation and isolation which are frequent

among IDUs may represent risk factors for increased

suicidal ideation.

Marzuk et al. [63], in an individual review of autopsy

and toxicological records, have reported that the preva-

lence of cocaine use among young Hispanic males who

committed suicide was 45%. Young, black or Hispanic

males who had used alcohol immediately before the fatal

injury were most likely to have been recent cocaine users.

After controlling for demographic variables and alcohol

use, subjects who committed suicide with firearms were

twice as likely to have used cocaine as those who used

other methods.

Roy [93], investigating 214 cocaine-dependent patients,

found that at least 39% of the cocaine-dependent patients

had attempted suicide, more often had a family history of

suicidal behaviour and reported significantly more child-

hood trauma. Cocaine-dependent patients also had higher

personality scores for introversion, neuroticism and hos-

tility and had significantly more comorbidity of substance

use and psychiatric and physical disorders.

Finally, the National Survey of Adolescents, conducted

to assess several suicidal risk factors, recruited 2002 ado-

lescents (aged 12–17) from the general population. Major

depressive episodes, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

and SUD were positively associated with an increased risk

for suicide attempts (as were female gender, age and

experience of sexual and physical assaults) [111].

Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse

among adolescent completed suicides

Back in the 1980s, Shafii and colleagues [103] reported a

dramatic increase in the referral of children and adolescents

with suicidal behaviour to their Child Psychiatric Service

in Louisville. They undertook psychological autopsies of

all children and adolescents who committed suicide as

determined by the Jefferson County coroner between 1980

and 1983. Twenty-four cases satisfied the criteria, but only

83% of the families agreed to participate in the study.

Compared to matched controls, suicides were more likely

to use non-prescribed drugs or alcohol (70 vs. 24%).

Marttunen et al. [62] investigated the prevalence of

mental disorders among 53 adolescent suicides in a

nationwide psychological autopsy study in Finland. The

authors reported that 26% of the suicides had alcohol abuse

or dependence. A more recent study of 106 adolescent

suicides aged 13–22 years old [78] indicated that 42% of

the victims had an alcohol use disorder or diagnostically

subthreshold alcohol misuse (16% alcohol abuse and 11%

alcohol dependence).

Brent et al. [11] investigated the psychiatric risk factors

for adolescent suicides in 67 suicides from 28 counties of

Western Pennsylvania. Suicides had an odds risk of 8.5 of

having substance abuse compared to matched controls. The

risk was even higher when substance abuse was comorbid

with affective disorders (OR = 17.0 vs. 3.3). Brent et al.

[10] also investigated the characteristics of 27 adolescent

suicides from the Pittsburgh area. The authors found higher

incidences of alcohol and drug misuse in the suicides (40.7

vs. 17.9% as best estimate for overall substance abuse, and

37.0 vs. 16.1%, and 29.6 vs. 14.3%, respectively, for

alcohol abuse and other drug abuse).

More recently, Renaud et al. [88] compared fifty-five

adolescents who committed suicide with a control group of

living subjects using psychological autopsies. The preva-

lence rates for current substance and alcohol abuse were

13% (OR = 5.365) for the suicides compared to 3% for the

control group. Furthermore, current mood disorders were

more common in suicides than in living subjects, 33 and

2%, respectively.

Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse

among adolescent suicide attempters

Several research studies have indicated that suicide

attempts are common in adolescents with SUD [5, 17,

26], and that substance use is common in those seeking

treatment for suicidal behaviour [29–31, 106, 112]. Vajda

and Steinbeck [107], in a retrospective record review of

112 adolescents (13–20 years old) who presented after a

suicide attempt at an emergency department, found that

35% met the criteria for an alcohol use disorder and 27%

met criteria for an SUD at the time of the attempt.

Moreover, the study found that a diagnosis of alcohol

abuse increased the risk of a repeat suicide attempt

threefold, while a diagnosis of illicit drug abuse increased

the risk of a repeat suicide attempt fourfold in the sub-

sequent 12 months. Spirito et al. [106] reported that 12%

of adolescent suicide attempters (12–18 years old) who

presented at an emergency department met the criteria for

an alcohol use disorder (6% alcohol abuse and 6% alco-

hol dependence) and 18% met the criteria for cannabis

use disorder (8.4% cannabis abuse and 9.6% cannabis

dependence).

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 479

123

Waldrop et al. [111] found that the weighted population

prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempts was 23.3 and

3.1%, respectively. The Mexican Adolescent Mental

Health Survey found associations between suicidal

attempts and drug use/abuse (OR = 1.1 and 3.8, respec-

tively), and alcohol use and abuse (OR = 2.4 and 5.4,

respectively) [67]. Furthermore, in this cohort, the onset of

substance exposure and attempting suicide occurred in the

same year in 42% for the use of drugs and in 14% for the

use of alcohol.

Suicide, substance abuse and other psychiatric

disorders: comorbidity matters

Co-occurring substance use and other psychiatric problems

are a prominent characteristic of those seeking help at

mental health services [13, 15, 44, 80, 91]. In a clinical

population of adolescents from substance abuse treatment

settings, Diamond and colleagues [27] found that 72% of

adolescent marijuana users had two or more psychiatric

disorders when entering treatment. In a case–control study

of adolescents with alcohol dependence, compared with

adolescents residing in the community without alcohol

dependence, Clark et al. [20] found that the most common

types of psychopathology observed in alcohol-dependent

adolescents included conduct disorder, ADHD, major

depressive disorder and PTSD.

Comorbidity increases the risk of suicidal behaviour and

the severity of the psychiatric illness, especially mood

disorders [8, 9, 11, 52, 56] and disruptive behaviour dis-

orders [38, 62].

Harrington et al. [40] found that depression in childhood

was a strong predictor of a suicide attempt in early adult

life. The risk is increased when depression is associated

with drug abuse, cognitive distortions, hopelessness and

low self-esteem, a passive coping style, social maladjust-

ment, interpersonal problems and familial and environ-

mental stresses [6].

Goldstein et al. [36] who studied 249 adolescents (aged

12–17 years) with bipolar disorders (BD) in a long-term

naturalistic study found that the lifetime prevalence of

SUD was 16% in these adolescents and that cannabis use

disorder was the most common form of SUD, followed by

alcohol use disorder. They also found that conduct disorder

was significantly associated with SUD and may be con-

sidered a predictor of SUD among adolescents with BD.

Moreover, they reported that SUD was associated with an

increased risk for suicidal behaviour and troubles with the

police (similar to results with adults with BD). In adoles-

cent females with BD, SUD was associated with an

increased rate of pregnancy and abortion.

Discussion

The high incidence of completed and attempted suicide in

substance abusers, as well as the elevated comorbidity

between suicide, substance abuse and psychiatric condi-

tions among adolescents, forces clinicians to deal with a

difficult task. Given the association between substance

abuse and suicidality, the next question is why are these

two behaviours associated.

Substance abuse is a well-known risk factor for attempt-

ing suicide, but some authors raise the question of whether it

is a proximal or a distal risk factor. Hufford [46] suggested

that the acute effects of intoxication may represent a proxi-

mal risk factor for suicidal behaviour. There is evidence that

excessive alcohol use heightens psychological distress,

aggressiveness and suicide-specific alcohol expectancies

and inhibits adaptive coping strategies. This additional bur-

den may be sufficient to move suicidal thoughts into action.

Support for this theory comes from research suggesting that

adolescents who make fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts

exhibit elevated rates of alcohol use and intoxication at the

time of the attempt [43, 55, 61, 95].

However, substance use may also function as a more

distal risk factor for suicidal behaviour [46]. Hufford [46]

suggested that SUD may be associated with increased

stress and co-occurring psychopathology, which in turn

increases the risk of suicidal behaviour [105]. Some studies

reported that substance use among adolescents is positively

related to heightened levels of stress across many areas of

life. For example, it has been associated with poor aca-

demic performance, legal and disciplinary problems and

interpersonal conflicts among adolescents [56, 71]. There-

fore, some adolescents who attempt suicide may be moti-

vated by a desire to escape from unbearable stressors,

difficulties or aversive self-awareness such as the realiza-

tion of inadequacies and unmet expectations [37].

Bukstein et al. [14] investigated the risk factors for

suicide in 23 adolescent suicides compared to 12 commu-

nity controls with a lifetime history of substance abuse.

They found that suicides were more likely to be active

substance abusers and to have comorbid major depression,

suicidal ideation within the past week, a family history of

depression and substance abuse, legal problems and the

presence of lethal weapons in the home than controls.

Following Bukstein et al. [14], three main hypotheses can

be postulated to explain the escalation process in substance

use and suicide:

1. Substance abuse ? breakdown in personal relation- ships ? increased suicide risk;

2. Substance abuse ? change in mood ? suicidal idea- tion or depression ? suicide attempt;

480 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

3. Substance abuse ? intoxicating effects ? impaired judgement ? increased suicide risk.

The presence of a mood disorder (depression or hypo-

mania) may also determine the onset of a secondary sub-

stance use. Following the hypothesis of ‘self-medication’,

some authors have suggested that suicidal behaviour could

also be a reflection of an underlying mood disorder [46].

Some vulnerable individuals with painful affective states

due to psychiatric conditions or having some affective

temperaments traits [82] seem to be predisposed to addic-

tion. The ‘self-medication’ properties of some substances

may reduce stress [57] or increase the drive to use drugs

[54, 90, 98]. A mechanism of ‘relief/escape’ may be fre-

quently associated with both the choice of suicidal and

substance use behaviours.

Moeller et al. [68] described poor impulse control as a

core behavioural feature of SUD and reported impulsivity

as a behavioural characteristic of suicidal subjects [28, 45,

60]. In one study, even after controlling for hopelessness,

neuroticism, external locus of control and extroversion,

poor impulse control remained significantly associated

with adolescent suicidal behaviour [3]. Several authors

have shown that poor impulse control may predict suicidal

behaviour [1, 28, 45, 60, 85].

In adolescents and young adults, traumatic events (a

poor family environment and interpersonal and intraper-

sonal events), which have been shown to contribute to

suicide risk [41], are frequent. Stressful life events are risk

factors both for suicidal behaviour and for the onset/esca-

lation of substance use [72, 108, 113]. Negative conse-

quences often result from a combination of poor impulse

control, stressful life events, suicidal behaviour and sub-

stance use [12, 23, 87].

Both acute effects (judgment impairment, reduced

inhibitions and worse impulse control) [58] and long-term

effects (neurocognitive dysfunctions and reduced behav-

ioural control) may increase the risk for suicidal behav-

iour [12, 99, 102, 110]. Adolescent substance users often

experience behavioural, affective and cognitive changes,

resulting in dysregulation of aggression, sensation seeking

and impulsivity [19, 64, 65]. Finally, altered serotonergic

functioning has also been found in suicides and suicide

attempts [59, 60, 105]. Alterations in serotonergic func-

tioning have also been found to be associated with the

abuse of some substances [70]. Initial abnormalities in

serotonin regulation, together with cell signalling and

signal modulation related to the differential expression of

the serotonin transporter and low levels of brain seroto-

nin, may increase with an increase of substance use [98].

Volkow [109] has suggested that physiological changes

such as serotonergic abnormalities secondary to substance

abuse may gradually worsen mood, increasing the

likelihood of suicidal behaviours, particularly in vulnera-

ble populations.

Dawes et al. [25] proposed a developmental-transac-

tional model integrating a stress-diathesis model [58]

including precursors, prominent risk factors and also pos-

sible mechanisms involved in suicidal behaviour. They

suggested that precursors such as familial factors lead to

neuroticism, hopelessness, mood symptoms and then to

depression while other precursors produce altered serotonin

function and deficits in executive functioning resulting in

impulsive-aggressive traits. Three possible causal path-

ways underlying the vulnerabilities leading to adolescent

suicidal behaviours and having bidirectional interactions

were reported: (1) stressful life events $ genetic markers of serotonin dysregulation $ suicide attempts, (2) sub- stance use $ impulsivity and (3) substance use $ suicide attempts.

Mood disorders interacting with stressful life events

may lead in adolescents first to suicidal ideation and then to

suicide attempts. Recent findings in adolescents and young

adults have demonstrated that functional serotonin trans-

porter polymorphisms interacting with stressful life events

may predict depression, suicidality [16] and substance

abuse [21, 51, 74]. As Bridge [12] suggested, the presence

of other risk factors, such as current drug intoxication,

exposure to suicide or availability of a lethal agent, may

increase the risk of suicidal behaviour.

Finally, another hypothesis such as a desire to escape

problems or the above-mentioned desire for ‘self-medica-

tion’ [46, 53] may be proposed to explain the co-occur-

rence of suicidal and substance use behaviours.

That in young substance users, often aggravated by

stigmatizing attitudes [79], contributes to the excess of

mortality in adolescence.

In the meantime, a proper assessment based on the

evaluation of the most relevant specific risk factors and

aimed at identifying those individuals considered to be at

risk is crucial. Several risk factors for suicide must be

assessed. The frequency of drug use, as well as environ-

mental stressors, should be carefully considered by clini-

cians when approaching patients with comorbid SUD and

suicidal risk because they can significantly impact an

adolescent’s emotional well-being. The burden of the

comorbid psychopathology should not be ignored. The

presence of multiple coexisting disorders can be considered

to be a strong predictor of poor outcome in substance users,

increasing both the risk of suicidal behaviour and the

severity of substance abuse.

An investigation of access to lethal weapons, especially

firearms, in the home is necessary. A recent paper [49]

reported that four-fifths of adolescent suicides took place in

the decedents’ homes, and most of the firearms were owned

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 481

123

by parents, highlighting the importance of limiting youth

access to firearms. Overall, the presence of available fire-

arms is a relevant factor in establishing the risk of suicidal

behaviour.

Sometimes, in acute cases, hospitalization may be

required; in this case, treatment should be individualized to

address the myriad of potential diagnoses [92]. There is

frequently a need for multi-modal treatment including

group, family, individual and milieu therapy, as well as

crisis-oriented interventions.

The CDC’s National Centre for Injury Prevention and

Control has published a programme with guidelines for

intervention strategies for communities that are interested

in developing prevention programmes for adolescents [73].

The strategies for suicide prevention for adolescents con-

centrate on two general themes: strategies to identify sub-

jects at risk so as to direct them to healthcare centres and

strategies to increase their social support network and their

management of stress.

Patients often avoid bringing up their suicidal thoughts

and plans, but they are more willing to discuss these if the

clinician asks specific questions about any intention to

commit suicide [83, 84]. Educating general practitioners

[96], nurses [81] and paediatricians [104] about suicide,

depression and substance abuse can have a major impact on

how patients at risk are evaluated and managed [66]. In a

qualitative study, Bergmans et al. [4] interviewed 25

repeated substance-using suicidal patients about suicidali-

ty, substance use and service use, and also 27 emergency

department staff about their attitudes when providing care

to these men. There was frequently a negative interaction

between the two groups due to feelings of frustration

experienced by the emergency department staff. Moreover,

suicidal patients seemed not to be able to express their

needs and feelings during crises. This can be ameliorated

by the inclusion of social workers as part of the emergency

department team when working with suicidal patients.

One of the most effective strategies for suicide pre-

vention is to teach people how to recognize and respond to

the signals of suicidal tendencies since this increases the

likelihood of at-risk youths seeking help. Everyone can be

a source of encouragement, strength and optimism, teach-

ing and practising problem-solving methods with the

affected person and inculcating a sense of optimism [115].

Treatment compliance is another critical problem,

although only few studies have focused on the long-term

consequences of treatment non-adherence. Groholt and

Ekberg [39] conducted a 9-year follow-up study in a

population of 71 adolescents who had attempted suicide.

They found that 44% of the adolescents made another

suicide attempt; the majority of them received psychiatric

treatment but about half of them attended fewer than three

sessions.

This review should be considered in the light of the

following limitations. First, meta-analytic techniques were

not used to evaluate the results of the research. Second, the

authors chose to report those studies that could support a

broad analysis of the topic. Despite the careful and sys-

tematic search, a number of additional papers may have

been missed. The heterogeneity of the studies presented a

challenge for quality assessment. However, studies inclu-

ded in this review were assessed for quality allowing us to

ascertain the relative contribution of each study to the

systematic review.

The majority of the studies raised many questions

without giving definitive answers. Bias may be introduced

by the inclusion of cross-sectional studies of highly

selected clinical samples. Prospective studies of samples

from clinical settings would permit the investigation of the

timing, duration, and severity of predictors of suicidal

behaviour in populations of substance abusers [114].

The relationship between suicide and drug use in ado-

lescents over time is not necessarily linear, and rates of

adolescent substance abuse have fluctuated in recent dec-

ades [49]. Similarly, the drugs abused vary over time.

Finally, research on adolescent suicide and substance abuse

has been confounded by changes in diagnostic criteria, lack

of age-specific criteria to diagnose adolescent SUD,

changes and advances in the treatment of adolescent sub-

stance abuse and a failure to investigate the presence of

substance use in the earlier studies of adolescent suicidal

behaviour [92].

Conclusions

In summary, the present review confirmed the frequent

association between substance use/abuse and adolescent

suicidal behaviour. Remedying the actual deficits of the

research about the association between suicidal behaviour

and SUD as well as exploring possibilities for making

suicide prevention more effective in clinically at-risk

groups are key issues for the future. Future longitudinal

studies, including samples from epidemiologically repre-

sentative populations as well as clinical samples, are

required to better understand how targeted resources can be

selectively oriented to particular at-risk groups.

Conflict of interest None.

References

1. Apter A, Bleich A, Plutchik R, Mendelsohn S, Tyano S (1988)

Suicidal behavior, depression, and conduct disorder in hospi-

talized adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

27(6):696–699

482 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

2. Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Mulder RT (1999) Cannabis abuse and

serious suicide attempts. Addiction 94(8):1155–1164

3. Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Mulder RT (1999) Personality traits

and cognitive styles as risk factors for serious suicide attempts

among young people. Suicide Life Threat Behav 29(1):37–47

4. Bergmans Y, Spence JM, Strike C, Links PS, Ball JS, Rufo C,

Rhodes AE, Watson WJ, Eynan R (2009) Repeat substance-

using suicidal clients-how can we be helpful? Soc Work Health

Care 48(4):420–431

5. Berman AL, Schwartz RH (1990) Suicide attempts among

adolescent drug users. Am J Dis Child 144(3):310–314

6. Bolognini M, Plancherel B, Laget J, Halfon O (2003) Adoles-

cent’s suicide attempts: populations at risk, vulnerability, and

substance use. Subst Use Misuse 38(11–13):1651–1669

7. Brent DA (1995) Risk factors for adolescent suicide and suicidal

behavior: mental and substance abuse disorders, family envi-

ronmental factors, and life stress. Suicide Life Threat Behav

25(Suppl):52–63

8. Brent DA, Johnson B, Bartle S, Bridge J, Rather C, Matta J,

Connolly J, Constantine D (1993) Personality disorder, tendency

to impulsive violence, and suicidal behavior in adolescents.

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(1):69–75

9. Brent DA, Kolko DJ, Wartella ME, Boylan MB, Moritz G,

Baugher M, Zelenak JP (1993) Adolescent psychiatric inpa-

tients’ risk of suicide attempt at 6-month follow-up. J Am Acad

Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(1):95–105

10. Brent DA, Perper JA, Goldstein CE, Kolko DJ, Allan MJ, All-

man CJ, Zelenak JP (1988) Risk factors for adolescent suicide.

A comparison of adolescent suicide victims with suicidal inpa-

tients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45(6):581–588

11. Brent DA, Perper JA, Moritz G, Allman C, Friend A, Roth C,

Schweers J, Balach L, Baugher M (1993) Psychiatric risk factors

for adolescent suicide: a case-control study. J Am Acad Child

Adolesc Psychiatry 32(3):521–529

12. Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA (2006) Adolescent suicide

and suicidal behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry

47(3–4):372–394

13. Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW Jr, Bigelow GE

(1997) Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treat-

ment-seeking opioid abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54(1):71–80

14. Bukstein OG, Brent DA, Perper JA, Moritz G, Baugher M,

Schweers J, Roth C, Balach L (1993) Risk factors for completed

suicide among adolescents with a lifetime history of substance

abuse: a case-control study. Acta Psychiatr Scand

88(6):403–408

15. Bukstein OG, Glancy LJ, Kaminer Y (1992) Patterns of affec-

tive comorbidity in a clinical population of dually diagnosed

adolescent substance abusers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psy-

chiatry 31(6):1041–1045

16. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig IW, Harrington

H, McClay J, Mill J, Martin J, Braithwaite A, Poulton R (2003)

Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a poly-

morphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301(5631):386–389

17. Cavaiola AA, Lavender N (1999) Suicidal behavior in chemi-

cally dependent adolescents. Adolescence 34(136):735–744

18. Chabrol H, Chauchard E, Girabet J (2008) Cannabis use and

suicidal behaviours in high-school students. Addict Behav

33(1):152–155

19. Clark DB, Cornelius JR, Kirisci L, Tarter RE (2005) Childhood

risk categories for adolescent substance involvement: a general

liability typology. Drug Alcohol Depend 77(1):13–21

20. Clark DB, Pollock N, Bukstein OG, Mezzich AC, Bromberger

JT, Donovan JE (1997) Gender and comorbid psychopathology

in adolescents with alcohol dependence. J Am Acad Child

Adolesc Psychiatry 36(9):1195–1203

21. Covault J, Tennen H, Armeli S, Conner TS, Herman AI, Cil-

lessen AH, Kranzler HR (2007) Interactive effects of the sero-

tonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and stressful life

events on college student drinking and drug use. Biol Psychiatry

61(5):609–616

22. Crockett LJ, Petersen AC (1993) Adolescent development:

health risks and opportunities for health promotion. In: Millstein

SG, Petersen AC, Nightingale EO (eds) Promoting the health of

adolescents: new directions for the twenty-first century. Oxford

University Press, New York, pp 13–37

23. Dalton EJ, Cate-Carter TD, Mundo E, Parikh SV, Kennedy JL

(2003) Suicide risk in bipolar patients: the role of co-morbid

substance use disorders. Bipolar Disord 5(1):58–61

24. Darke S, Ross J (2002) Suicide among heroin users: rates, risk

factors and methods. Addiction 97(11):1383–1394

25. Dawes MA, Mathias CW, Richard DM, Hill-Kapturczak N,

Dougherty DM (2008) Adolescent suicidal behavior and sub-

stance use: developmental mechanisms. Subst Abus 2:13–28

26. Deykin EY, Buka SL (1994) Suicidal ideation and attempts

among chemically dependent adolescents. Am J Public Health

84(4):634–639

27. Diamond G, Panichelli-Mindel SM, Shera D, Dennis ML, Tims

F, Ungemack J (2006) Psychiatric syndromes in adolescents

seeking outpatient treatment for marijuana with abuse and

dependency in outpatient treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst

Abuse 15:37–54

28. Dougherty DM, Mathias CW, Marsh DM, Moeller FG, Swann

AC (2004) Suicidal behaviors and drug abuse: impulsivity and

its assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend 76(Suppl):S93–S105

29. Epstein JA, Spirito A (2009) Risk factors for suicidality among a

nationally representative sample of high school students. Suicide

Life Threat Behav 39(3):241–251

30. Epstein JA, Spirito A (2010) Gender-specific risk factors for

suicidality among high school students. Arch Suicide Res

14(3):193–205

31. Esposito-Smythers C, Spirito A (2004) Adolescent substance

use and suicidal behavior: a review with implications for treat-

ment research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28(5 Suppl):77S–88S

32. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Swain-Campbell N (2002) Can-

nabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young

adulthood. Addiction 97(9):1123–1135

33. Garlow SJ (2002) Age, gender, and ethnicity differences in

patterns of cocaine and ethanol use preceding suicide. Am J

Psychiatry 159(4):615–619

34. Garlow SJ, Purselle DC, Heninger M (2007) Cocaine and

alcohol use preceding suicide in African American and white

adolescents. J Psychiatr Res 41(6):530–536

35. Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE (2002)

Reducing suicide: a national imperative. Joseph Henry Press,

Washington

36. Goldstein BI, Strober MA, Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Esposito-

Smythers C, Goldstein TR, Leonard H, Hunt J, Gill MK, Iyengar

S, Grimm C, Yang M, Ryan ND, Keller MB (2008) Substance

use disorders among adolescents with bipolar spectrum disor-

ders. Bipolar Disord 10(4):469–478

37. Goldston DB (2004) Conceptual issues in understanding the

relationship between suicidal behavior and substance use during

adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend 76(Suppl):S79–S91

38. Gould MS, King R, Greenwald S, Fisher P, Schwab-Stone M,

Kramer R, Flisher AJ, Goodman S, Canino G, Shaffer D (1998)

Psychopathology associated with suicidal ideation and attempts

among children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc

Psychiatry 37(9):915–923

39. Groholt B, Ekeberg O (2009) Prognosis after adolescent suicide

attempt: mental health, psychiatric treatment, and suicide

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 483

123

attempts in a nine-year follow-up study. Suicide Life Threat

Behav 39(2):125–136

40. Harrington R, Bredenkamp D, Groothues C, Rutter M, Fudge H,

Pickles A (1994) Adult outcomes of childhood and adolescent

depression. III. Links with suicidal behaviours. J Child Psychol

Psychiatry 35(7):1309–1319

41. Hatch SL, Dohrenwend BP (2007) Distribution of traumatic and

other stressful life events by race/ethnicity, gender, SES and

age: a review of the research. Am J Community Psychol

40:313–332

42. Havens JR, Sherman SG, Sapun M, Strathdee SA (2006) Prev-

alence and correlates of suicidal ideation among young injection

vs. noninjection drug users. Subst Use Misuse 41(2):245–254

43. Hawton K, Fagg J (1992) Deliberate self-poisoning and self-

injury in adolescents. A study of characteristics and trends in

Oxford, 1976–89. Br J Psychiatry 161:816–823

44. Hien D, Zimberg S, Weisman S, First M, Ackerman S (1997)

Dual diagnosis subtypes in urban substance abuse and mental

health clinics. Psychiatr Serv 48(8):1058–1063

45. Horesh N (2001) Self-report vs. computerized measures of

impulsivity as a correlate of suicidal behavior. Crisis

22(1):27–31

46. Hufford MR (2001) Alcohol and suicidal behavior. Clin Psychol

Rev 21(5):797–811

47. Ilomaki E, Rasanen P, Viilo K, Hakko H (2007) Suicidal

behavior among adolescents with conduct disorder—the role of

alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Res 150(3):305–311

48. Innamorati M, Pompili M, Lester D, Tatarelli R, Girardi P

(2008) Recreational drug use and suicidality among Italian

young adults. J Addict Dis 27(4):51–59

49. Johnson RM, Barber C, Azrael D, Clark DE, Hemenway D

(2010) Who are the owners of firearms used in adolescent sui-

cides? Suicide Life Threat Behav 40(6):609–611

50. Kalyoncu A, Mırsal H, Pektaş Ö, Tan D, Beyazyürek M (2007) Heroin-dependent patients attempting and not attempting sui-

cide: a comparison. Acta Neuropsychiatr 19:297–303

51. Kaufman J, Yang BZ, Douglas-Palumberi H, Crouse-Artus M,

Lipschitz D, Krystal JH, Gelernter J (2007) Genetic and envi-

ronmental predictors of early alcohol use. Biol Psychiatry

61(11):1228–1234

52. Kelly TM, Cornelius JR, Clark DB (2004) Psychiatric disorders

and attempted suicide among adolescents with substance use

disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 73(1):87–97

53. Khantzian EJ (1997) The self-medication hypothesis of sub-

stance use disorders: a reconsideration and recent applications.

Harv Rev Psychiatry 4(5):231–244

54. Koob GF, Le Moal M (2001) Drug addiction, dysregulation of

reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24:97–129

55. Kotila L, Lonnqvist J (1988) Adolescent suicide attempts: sex

differences predicting suicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand

77(3):264–270

56. Lewinsohn PM, Gotlib IH, Seeley JR (1995) Adolescent psy-

chopathology: IV. Specificity of psychosocial risk factors for

depression and substance abuse in older adolescents. J Am Acad

Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34(9):1221–1229

57. Light JM, Grube JW, Madden PA, Gover J (2003) Adolescent

alcohol use and suicidal ideation: a nonrecursive model. Addict

Behav 28(4):705–724

58. Mann JJ (2003) Neurobiology of suicidal behaviour. Nat Rev

Neurosci 4(10):819–828

59. Mann JJ, Brent DA, Arango V (2001) The neurobiology and

genetics of suicide and attempted suicide: a focus on the sero-

tonergic system. Neuropsychopharmacology 24(5):467–477

60. Mann JJ, Oquendo M, Underwood MD, Arango V (1999) The

neurobiology of suicide risk: a review for the clinician. J Clin

Psychiatry 60(Suppl 2):7–11

61. Marttunen MJ, Aro HM, Henriksson MM, Lonnqvist JK (1991)

Mental disorders in adolescent suicide. DSM-III-R axes I and II

diagnoses in suicides among 13- to 19-year-olds in Finland.

Arch Gen Psychiatry 48(9):834–839

62. Marttunen MJ, Aro HM, Henriksson MM, Lonnqvist JK (1994)

Antisocial behaviour in adolescent suicide. Acta Psychiatr

Scand 89(3):167–173

63. Marzuk PM, Tardiff K, Leon AC, Stajic M, Morgan EB, Mann

JJ (1992) Prevalence of cocaine use among residents of New

York City who committed suicide during a one-year period. Am

J Psychiatry 149(3):371–375

64. McGue M, Iacono WG, Legrand LN, Elkins I (2001) Origins

and consequences of age at first drink. II. Familial risk and

heritability. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25(8):1166–1173

65. McGue M, Iacono WG, Legrand LN, Malone S, Elkins I (2001)

Origins and consequences of age at first drink. I. Associations

with substance-use disorders, disinhibitory behavior and psy-

chopathology, and P3 amplitude. Alcohol Clin Exp Res

25(8):1156–1165

66. Mental Health and Substance Abuse (2006) Facts and figures.

Suicide prevention: emerging from darkness. Available: http://

www.searo.who.int/en/Section1174/Section1199/Section1567/

Section1824_8087.htm. Accessed 7 Jul 2011

67. Miller M, Borges G, Orozco R, Mukamal K, Rimm EB, Benjet

C, Medina-Mora ME (2010) Exposure to alcohol, drugs and

tobacco and the risk of subsequent suicidality: findings from the

Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. Drug Alcohol

Depend 113(2–3):110–117

68. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann

AC (2001) Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry

158(11):1783–1793

69. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred

reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the

PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535

70. Morgan MJ (2000) Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of its possible

persistent psychological effects. Psychopharmacology

152(3):230–248

71. Needle R, McCubbin H, Lorence J, Hochhauser M (1983)

Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a

family-based study: a methodological report. Int J Addict

18(7):901–912

72. Novins DK, Mitchell CM (1998) Factors associated with mari-

juana use among American Indian adolescents. Addiction

93(11):1693–1702

73. O’Carroll PW, Potter LB, Mercy JA (1994) Programs for the

prevention of suicide among adolescents and young adults.

MMWR Recomm Rep 43(RR-6):1–7

74. Olsson CA, Byrnes GB, Lotfi-Miri M, Collins V, Williamson R,

Patton C, Anney RJ (2005) Association between 5-HTTLPR

genotypes and persisting patterns of anxiety and alcohol use:

results from a 10-year longitudinal study of adolescent mental

health. Mol Psychiatry 10(9):868–876

75. Pedersen W (2008) Does cannabis use lead to depression and

suicidal behaviours? A population-based longitudinal study.

Acta Psychiatr Scand 118(5):395–403

76. Peters KD, Kochanek KD, Murphy SL (1998) Deaths: final data

for 1996. Natl Vital Stat Rep 47(9):1–100

77. Peterson BS, Zhang H, Santa Lucia R, King RA, Lewis M (1996)

Risk factors for presenting problems in child psychiatric emer-

gencies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35(9):1162–1173

78. Pirkola SP, Marttunen MJ, Henriksson MM, Isometsa ET,

Heikkinen ME, Lonnqvist JK (1999) Alcohol-related problems

among adolescent suicides in Finland. Alcohol Alcohol

34(3):320–329

79. Pompili M, Mancinelli I, Tatarelli R (2003) Stigma as a cause of

suicide. Br J Psychiatry 183:173–174

484 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485

123

80. Pompili M, Mancinelli I, Girardi P, Tatarelli R (2004) Pre-

venting suicide in young schizophrenics who are substance

abusers. Subst Use Misuse 39:1437–1441

81. Pompili M, Girardi P, Ruberto A, Kotzalidis GD, Tatarelli R

(2005) Emergency staff reactions to suicidal and self-harming

patients. Eur J Emerg Med 12:169–178

82. Pompili M, Girardi P, Tatarelli R, De Pisa E, Tondo L, Akiskal

KK, Akiskal HS (2008) TEMPS-A (Rome): psychometric vali-

dation of affective temperaments in clinically well subjects in

mid- and south Italy. J Affect Disord 107(1–3):63–75

83. Pompili M, Innamorati M, Del Casale A, Serafini G, Tatarelli R

(2009) La prevenzione del suicidio e il ruolo strategico dei

medici di base. SIMG 1:35–41

84. Pompili M, Rihmer Z, Innamorati M, Lester D, Girardi P, Ta-

tarelli R (2009) Assessment and treatment of suicide risk in

bipolar disorders. Expert Rev Neurother 9:109–136

85. Pompili M, Iliceto P, Luciano D, Innamorati M, Serafini G, Del

Casale A, Tatarelli R, Girardi P, Lester D (2011) Higher

hopelessness and suicide risk predict lower selfdeception among

psychiatric patients and clinically-well subjects. Riv Psichiatr

46:24–30

86. Price C, Hemmingsson T, Lewis G, Zammit S, Allebeck P

(2009) Cannabis and suicide: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry

195(6):492–497

87. Putnins AL (1995) Recent drug use and suicidal behaviour

among young offenders. Drug Alcohol Rev 14(2):151–158

88. Renaud J, Berlim MT, McGirr A, Tousignant M, Turecki G

(2008) Current psychiatric morbidity, aggression/impulsivity,

and personality dimensions in child and adolescent suicide: a

case-control study. J Affect Disord 105(1–3):221–228

89. Rey JM, Sawyer MG, Raphael B, Patton GC, Lynskey M (2002)

Mental health of teenagers who use cannabis. Results of an

Australian survey. Br J Psychiatry 180:216–221

90. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2000) The psychology and neuro-

biology of addiction: a incentive-sensitization view. Addiction

95(Suppl):S91–S117

91. Ross HE, Glaser FB, Germanson T (1988) The prevalence of

psychiatric disorders in patients with alcohol and other drug

problems. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45(11):1023–1031

92. Rowan A (2001) Adolescents substance abuse and suicide.

Depress Anxiety 14:186–191

93. Roy A (2001) Characteristics of cocaine-dependent patients who

attempt suicide. Am J Psychiatry 158(8):1215–1219

94. Roy A (2002) Characteristics of opiate dependent patients who

attempt suicide. J Clin Psychiatry 63(5):403–407

95. Runeson B (1990) Psychoactive substance use disorder in youth

suicide. Alcohol Alcohol 25(5):561–568

96. Rutz W, von Knorring L, Walinder J (1989) Frequency of sui-

cide on Gotland after systematic postgraduate education of

general practitioners. Acta Psychiatr Scand 80(2):151–154

97. SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration) (2002) Substance use and the risk of suicide

among youths. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse

Report

98. Schepis TS, Adinoff B, Rao U (2008) Neurobiological processes

in adolescent addictive disorders. Am J Addict 17:6–23

99. Schneider M, Koch M (2003) Chronic pubertal, but not adult

chronic cannabinoid treatment impairs sensorimotor gating,

recognition memory, and the performance in a progressive ratio

task in adult rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1760–1769

100. Schneider B, Schnabel A, Sargk D, Maurer K, Weber B, Wet-

terling T (2005) Detection of alcohol consumption in suicides.

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 255:1–5

101. Schneider B, Wetterling T, Sargk D, Schneider F, Schnabel A,

Maurer K, Fritze J (2006) Axis I disorders and personality dis-

orders as risk factors for suicide. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin

Neurosci 256:17–27

102. Schuckit M, Schuckit J (1989) Substance use and abuse: a risk

factor in youth suicide. In: Report of the Secretary’s task force

on youth suicide, vol 2: risk factors for youth suicide (DHHS

Pub. No. (ADM) 89-1622, Washington, DC). Government

Printing Office

103. Shafii M, Carrigan S, Whittinghill JR, Derrick A (1985) Psy-

chological autopsy of completed suicide in children and ado-

lescents. Am J Psychiatry 142(9):1061–1064

104. Shain BN (2007) Suicide and suicide attempts in adolescents.

Pediatrics 120(3):669–676

105. Spirito A, Esposito-Smythers C (2006) Attempted and com-

pleted suicide in adolescence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol

2:237–266

106. Spirito A, Mehlenbeck R, Barnett N, Lewander W, Voss A

(2003) The relation of mood and behavior to alcohol use in

adolescent suicide attempters. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse

12(4):35–53

107. Vajda J, Steinbeck K (2000) Factors associated with repeat

suicide attempts among adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry

34(3):437–445

108. van den Bree MB, Pickworth WB (2005) Risk factors predicting

change in marijuana involvement in teenagers. Arch Gen Psy-

chiatry 62:311–319

109. Volkow ND (2001) Drug abuse and mental illness: progress in

understanding comorbidity. Am J Psychiatry 158(8):1181–1183

110. Volkow ND, Li TK (2005) Drugs and alcohol: treating and

preventing abuse, addiction, and their medical consequences.

Pharmacol Ther 108:3–17

111. Waldrop AE, Hanson RF, Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Naugle

AE, Saunders BE (2007) Risk factors for suicidal behavior

among a national sample of adolescents: implications for pre-

vention. J Trauma Stress 20(5):869–879

112. West BA, Swahn MH, McCarty F (2010) Children at risk for

suicide attempt and attempt-related injuries: findings from the

2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. West J Emerg Med

11:257–263

113. Windle M, Wiesner M (2004) Trajectories of marijuana use

from adolescence to young adulthood: predictors and outcomes.

Dev Psychopathol 16:1007–1027

114. Wines JD Jr, Saitz R, Horton NJ, Lloyd-Travaglini C, Samet JH

(2004) Suicidal behavior, drug use and depressive symptoms

after detoxification: a 2-year prospective study. Drug Alcohol

Depend 76(Suppl):S21–S29

115. World Health Organization (2007) Mental health and sub-

stance abuse. Facts and figures. Suicide prevention. http://www.

searo.who.int/en/section1174/section1199/section1567_6745.htm.

Accessed 4 Jan 2011

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 485

123

  • Substance abuse and suicide risk among adolescents
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
      • Data collection
      • Data extraction
      • Summary measures
    • Results
      • Suicide risk in alcohol users/abusers
      • Suicide risk in other substance users/abusers
      • Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse among adolescent completed suicides
      • Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse among adolescent suicide attempters
      • Suicide, substance abuse and other psychiatric disorders: comorbidity matters
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Conflict of interest
    • References