Research Paper (APA STYLE) as soon as possible
O R I G I N A L P A P E R
Substance abuse and suicide risk among adolescents
Maurizio Pompili • Gianluca Serafini • Marco Innamorati • Massimo Biondi •
Alberto Siracusano • Massimo Di Giannantonio • Giancarlo Giupponi •
Mario Amore • David Lester • Paolo Girardi • Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler
Received: 9 August 2011 / Accepted: 10 January 2012 / Published online: 31 January 2012
� Springer-Verlag 2012
Abstract The aim of this paper was to review the liter-
ature concerning the relationship between suicide and
substance abuse behaviours among adolescents, focusing
on epidemiology, comorbidity and preventive programmes.
We performed a Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, PsycLit and
PsycInfo search to identify all papers and book chapters
during the period between 1980 and 2011. Adolescents
with substance abuse disorder who attempt or complete
suicide can be characterized as having mood disorders,
stressful life events, interpersonal problems, poor social
support, lonely lives and feelings of hopelessness. The
research supports the existence of a strong relationship
between suicide and substance abuse. Preventive pro-
grammes should be based on the detection of risk factors
associated with both suicide and substance abuse disorder.
Management programmes should combine different
therapeutic strategies such as peer-to-peer education,
school-based programmes, psychotherapy and pharmaco-
logical treatment. Evidence suggests that targeted suicide
prevention programmes can be delivered which reduce the
burden associated with substance abuse and suicide in
youths.
Keywords Drug abuse � Alcohol abuse � Suicide � Youths � Prevention
Introduction
Adolescence is a challenging period of cognitive, biologi-
cal, physiological and psychological transition, occurring
between 10 and 19 years of age [22]. The transition to
M. Pompili � G. Serafini � M. Innamorati � P. Girardi Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory
Functions, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital,
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
M. Pompili
McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
M. Pompili (&) Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory
Organs—Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome,
1035-1039 Via di Grottarossa, 00189 Rome, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Biondi
Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine,
Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
A. Siracusano
Department of Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry,
University of Rome ‘‘Tor Vergata’’, Rome, Italy
M. Di Giannantonio
Neuroscience and Imaging Department, University of Chieti,
Chieti, Italy
G. Giupponi
Department of Psychiatry, Bolzano, Italy
M. Amore
Department of Neurosciences, Division of Psychiatry, University
of Parma, Parma, Italy
D. Lester
The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Pomona, NJ, USA
A. M. Möller-Leimkühler
Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University
of Munich, Munich, Germany
123
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
DOI 10.1007/s00406-012-0292-0
adolescence leads to needs for independence, identity for-
mation and acceptance by peers. All of these contribute to
risk-taking behaviours, suicidal ideation and suicidal
behaviour.
According to the World Health Organization [115],
suicide is the third leading cause of death among those
aged 15–24, after car accidents and cancer. Additionally,
suicide attempts represent the main reason for referral to
child and adolescent psychiatric emergency services [77].
Despite the fact that suicide mortality in middle-aged
and older persons has recently decreased in several Euro-
pean and North American countries, suicides among youths
have risen dramatically in recent decades [76], and
researchers have associated this increase in youth suicide
with the widespread use of alcohol and other drugs among
adolescents [7, 47, 112].
Both cross-sectional and retrospective evidence in ado-
lescent and adult populations have reported an association
between suicidal behaviours and substance use. Goldsmith
et al. [35] reported a rapid increase in drug abuse in the
USA in the years after 1960 especially in adolescents.
Adolescent suicidal behaviour also increased by about
300%. Substance using in adolescence has been proposed
as a relevant risk factor for suicidal behaviours [97]. Wines
et al. [114] found that 28% of inpatients in drug abuse
treatment centres had histories of suicidal ideation and 21%
had attempted suicide. Additionally, after 2 years of sub-
stance abuse treatment, 19% continued to have suicidal
ideation and 7% had made suicide attempts. It was also
suggested that the estimated risk for suicide in the presence
of alcohol-related disorders was about four times greater in
men and five times greater in women than in its absence
[100]. Shneider et al. [101] reported that alcohol-related
disorders (DSM-IV alcohol dependence) were more often
diagnosed in suicide victims than in controls (OR = 8.8,
95% CI 4.4–17.7).
Based on the existing literature, this systematic review
first aimed to investigate whether there is an association
between the substance use/abuse/dependence and suicidal
behaviour in clinical and non-clinical samples. Our second
aim was to ascertain whether substance use/abuse/depen-
dence may be considered as a specific risk factor for sui-
cide after controlling for a number of potentially
confounding factors.
Materials and methods
To achieve a high standard of reporting, we have adopted
‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) guidelines [69]. In order to
provide a new and timely systematic review of substance
abuse and suicidal behaviour, we performed a Pubmed/
Medline, Scopus, PsycLit and PsycInfo search to identify
all papers and book chapters during the period between
1980 and 2010. The search used the following terms:
(suicide OR suicide attempt OR ideation OR suicidal
behaviour) AND (epidemiology OR rates OR trends OR
incidence) AND (drug OR substance abuse OR drug abuse
OR substance disease OR comorbidity) AND (‘prevention’
OR ‘intervention’ OR ‘future implications’). Specifically,
in order to adequately focus on the specific field of interest,
the following search query was used in Pubmed: (suicid*
[TI] AND substanc* [TI]). This search in Medline gener-
ated 182 articles. The same search strategy was used in
Scopus rendering 4 additional articles and in PsycLit/Psy-
cInfo (specifying ‘suicide AND substance abuse’ and
deleting ‘[TI]’) providing 43 further articles. The reference
lists of the articles included in the review were manually
checked yielding 27 additional articles that might be
potentially considered for screening. The Pubmed, Scopus
and PsycLit/PsycInfo databases revealed a total of 151
potentially relevant articles after the removal of duplicates.
Figure 1 summarizes the search strategy used for selecting
studies (identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion
process).
Data collection
Only those articles published in peer-reviewed journals
were included. Where a title or abstract seemed to
describe a study eligible for inclusion, the full article was
obtained and examined to assess its relevance based on
the inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers con-
ducted a two-step literature search. Any discrepancies
between the two reviewers who, blind to each other,
examined the studies for the possible inclusion were
resolved by consultations with a senior author. Included
were all contributions that explicitly mention the associ-
ation between substance use and suicidal behaviour in
clinical and non-clinical (healthy) samples. Exclusion
criteria are the following: (1) studies including samples
with mean age [18 were excluded years; (2) studies published before 1980; (3) articles without abstracts or
abstracts that did not explicitly mention suicidal behav-
iour, substance use, abuse and dependence; (4) articles not
published in English language; and (5) articles having low
relevance to the main theme. Included papers were
restricted to those in English with the exception of one
Norwegian study [75] included in Table 1 because it was
considered to be of particular interest. All 151 articles
were critically evaluated: 24 of these were excluded
because they were not published in peer-reviewed jour-
nals, were without abstracts, had abstracts that did not
explicitly mention suicidal behaviour (suicidal attempts
and ideation) and substance abuse, and are articles with a
470 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
publication date before 1980. This left 127 full-text arti-
cles of which 110 articles were excluded because they
were not published in English language, had low rele-
vance to the main theme, included unclear data regarding
materials and method and number of patients analyzed.
Thus, 17 articles meeting our inclusion criteria were
included in the present review.
Data extraction
Data were independently collected by the two reviewers.
The following characteristics were extracted from the 17
included articles in Table 1: author/s and publication year,
study design, sample size, eventual follow-up, conclusions
and main risk factors.
The principal reviewer (MP) inspected all reports. Then,
three reviewers (MP, PG and GS) independently inspected
all citations of studies identified by the search and grouped
them according to the topic of the papers. Reviewers
acquired the full article for all papers located. Where dis-
agreement occurred, this was resolved by discussion with
MA who also with double-blind features inspected all
articles located and grouped them following the major
areas of interest identified by all authors. If doubt
remained, the study was put on the list of those awaiting
assessment, pending acquisition of more information. We
excluded from our analysis any studies vaguely reporting
on substance abuse in adolescence or using inadequate or
unclear diagnostic criteria for such disorders or those
inappropriately assessing the impact of substance abuse on
suicide risk. Results of this search are presented in the
paragraphs regarding the role of substance abuse in the
precipitation of suicide risk.
Summary measures
Studies were rated for quality using the following eligi-
bility criteria: (i) the representativeness of the sample
from the general population (0–2 points), (ii) the presence
of a control group (1 or 2 points), (iii) presence of follow-
up [1 year (1 or 2 points), (iv) evidence-based measures of assessment (e.g. the use of the SCID-I for the diagnosis
of the substance abuse/dependence or other psychometric
evaluation) (1 or 2 points), (v) the presence of two
independent raters who blindly diagnosed the substance
abuse/dependence (1 or 2 points), (vi) a statistical eval-
uation of the interrater reliability (1 or 2 points) and (vii)
evidence-based measures for assessing suicide or suicide
attempts (1 or 2 points). Quality ratings had 14 as the
maximum score.
Studies were differentiated in the following way: good
quality ([11 points)—most or all criteria being fulfilled, and where they were not met, the study conclusions were
thought very unlikely to alter; moderate quality (6–11
Fig. 1 Search strategy used for selecting studies (identification,
screening, eligibility, inclusion
in the systematic review)
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 471
123
T a
b le
1 R
e le
v a n
t st
u d
ie s
a b
o u
t su
b st
a n
c e
a b
u se
a n
d su
ic id
e ri
sk in
a d
o le
sc e n
ts a n
d y
o u
n g
a d
u lt
s
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
D a rk
e a n
d
R o
ss [2
4 ]
R e v
ie w
a rt
ic le
o n
su ic
id e
ra te
s,
su ic
id e
ri sk
fa c to
rs a n
d m
e th
o d
s
e m
p lo
y e d
fo r
su ic
id e
a m
o n
g
h e ro
in u
se rs
N o
t re
p o
rt e d
N o
H e ro
in u
se rs
a re
1 4
ti m
e s
m o
re li
k e ly
th a n
p e e rs
to d
ie fr
o m
su ic
id e .
T h
e y
a ls
o a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e m
o re
fr e q
u e n
tl y
th a n
th a t
o f
c o
m m
u n
it y
sa m
p le
s. R
is k
fa c to
rs fo
r su
ic id
e w
e re
p sy
c h
o p
a th
o lo
g y
, fa
m il
y d
y sf
u n
c ti
o n
a n
d so
c ia
l is
o la
ti o
n a s
w e ll
a s
p o
ly -
d ru
g u
se .
D ru
g s
b u
t n
o t
h e ro
in a s
a
m e th
o d
o f
su ic
id e
a p
p e a r
to p
la y
a
re le
v a n
t ro
le in
su ic
id e
a m
o n
g th
is
g ro
u p
1 .
P sy
c h
o p
a th
o lo
g y
2 .
F a m
il y
d y
sf u
n c ti
o n
3 .
S o
c ia
l is
o la
ti o
n
4 .
P o
ly -d
ru g
u se
I =
2
II =
2
II I
= 0
IV =
1
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 2
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 1
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
R o
y [9
4 ]
C a se
– c o
n tr
o l
st u
d y
c o
m p
a ri
n g
o p
ia te
-d e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts w
h o
h a d
a n
d h
a d
n o
t a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e
2 4
6 o
p ia
te -
d e p
e n
d e n
t
p a ti
e n
ts
N o
O n
e h
u n
d re
d o
f th
e 2
4 6
o p
ia te
-d e p
e n
d e n
t
p a ti
e n
ts h
a d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e ,
a n
d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
m o
re o
f th
e o
p ia
te -
d e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts w
h o
h a d
a tt
e m
p te
d
su ic
id e
h a d
a fa
m il
y h
is to
ry o
f b
o th
c o
m p
le te
d a n
d a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e .
O p
ia te
-d e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts w
h o
h a d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e re
p o
rt e d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
m o
re c h
il d
h o
o d
e m
o ti
o n
a l
a b
u se
,
p h
y si
c a l
a b
u se
, se
x u
a l
a b
u se
a n
d
e m
o ti
o n
a l
a n
d p
h y
si c a l
n e g
le c t.
M o
re o
v e r,
o p
ia te
-d e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts
w h
o h
a d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e w
e re
fo u
n d
to b
e si
g n
ifi c a n
tl y
m o
re in
tr o
v e rt
e d
,
h o
st il
e a n
d n
e u
ro ti
c .
F in
a ll
y ,
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
m o
re o
f th
e p
a ti
e n
ts w
h o
h a d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e w
e re
fe m
a le
a n
d
u n
e m
p lo
y e d
1 .
F a m
il y
h is
to ry
o f
b o
th c o
m p
le te
d a n
d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e
2 .
C h
il d
h o
o d
e m
o ti
o n
a l
a b
u se
3 .
C h
il d
h o
o d
p h
y si
c a l
a b
u se
4 .
C h
il d
h o
o d
se x
u a l
a b
u se
5 .
E m
o ti
o n
a l
a n
d
p h
y si
c a l
n e g
le c t
6 .
In tr
o v
e rs
io n
, h
o st
il it
y
a n
d n
e u
ro ti
c is
m .
7 .
B e in
g fe
m a le
a n
d
u n
e m
p lo
y e d
I =
2
II =
2
II I
= 0
IV =
1
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 2
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 1
G o
o d
q u
a li
ty
H a v
e n
s
e t
a l.
[4 2 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
st u
d y
in v
e st
ig a ti
n g
th e
re la
ti o
n sh
ip b
e tw
e e n
su ic
id a l
id e a ti
o n
w it
h in
je c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se rs
(I D
U s)
a n
d n
o n
-i n
je c ti
o n
d ru
g
u se
rs (N
ID U
s)
2 4
4 in
je c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se rs
a n
d 7
3 n
o n
-
in je
c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se rs
N o
S u
ic id
a l
id e a ti
o n
w a s
p re
se n
t in
2 7
% o
f
th e
ID U
p a ti
e n
ts v
s. 1
4 %
a m
o n
g th
e
N ID
U p
a ti
e n
ts ,
p =
0 .0
0 3
. A
ft e r
c o
n tr
o ll
in g
fo r
c o
n fo
u n
d in
g li
fe st
y le
fa c to
rs ,
in c lu
d in
g h
o m
e le
ss n
e ss
,
d e p
re ss
iv e
sy m
p to
m s
a n
d g
a y
/l e sb
ia n
/
b is
e x
u a l
id e n
ti ty
, th
e a ss
o c ia
ti o
n w
a s
n o
lo n
g e r
si g
n ifi
c a n
t. T
h e
p o
o r
so c io
p sy
c h
o lo
g ic
a l
b a c k
g ro
u n
d
(p sy
c h
ia tr
ic d
is o
rd e rs
, se
x u
a l
o ri
e n
ta ti
o n
, is
o la
ti o
n ),
w h
ic h
is
fr e q
u e n
t a m
o n
g in
je c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se rs
m a y
b e
re sp
o n
si b
le fo
r th
e in
c re
a se
d
su ic
id a l
id e a ti
o n
fo u
n d
in ID
U s
1 .
P sy
c h
ia tr
ic d
is o
rd e rs
2 .
S e x
u a l
o ri
e n
ta ti
o n
3 .
Is o
la ti
o n
I =
2
II =
2
II I
= 0
IV =
1
V =
0
V I
= 1
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
6
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
472 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
T a
b le
1 c o
n ti
n u
e d
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
K a ly
o n
c u
e t
a l.
[5 0 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
e x
a m
in a ti
o n
o f
th e
so c io
-d e m
o g
ra p
h ic
a n
d c li
n ic
a l
c h
a ra
c te
ri st
ic s
1 0
8 y
o u
n g
a d
u lt
h e ro
in -
d e p
e n
d e n
t
in p
a ti
e n
ts
N o
B o
th th
e fe
m a le
a n
d m
a le
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p te
rs w
e re
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
y o
u n
g e r
a t
th e
o n
se t
o f
h e ro
in u
se th
a n
th o
se
w h
o h
a d
n o
t a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e .
T h
e
st a rt
in g
a g
e o
f h
e ro
in u
se m
a y
b e
a ri
sk
fa c to
r fo
r su
ic id
e a tt
e m
p ts
. T
h e
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p te
rs h
a d
e x
p e ri
e n
c e d
g re
a te
r
fa m
il y
p sy
c h
o p
a th
o lo
g y
a n
d
d y
sf u
n c ti
o n
th a n
th e
n o
n -a
tt e m
p te
rs
a n
d h
a d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
h ig
h e r
sc o
re s
o n
th e
C h
il d
h o
o d
T ra
u m
a Q
u e st
io n
n a ir
e .
P re
v io
u s
tr a u
m a ti
c e x
p e ri
e n
c e s
a re
st ro
n g
ly a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h su
ic id
e
a tt
e m
p ts
in y
o u
n g
a d
u lt
h e ro
in -
d e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts .
In p
a rt
ic u
la r,
th e
m a le
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p te
rs m
o re
o ft
e n
m e t
th e
c ri
te ri
a fo
r d
e p
re ss
iv e ,
a n
x ie
ty a n
d
a n
ti so
c ia
l p
e rs
o n
a li
ty d
is o
rd e rs
1 .
Y o
u n
g e r
a g
e
2 .
T h
e st
a rt
in g
a g
e o
f
h e ro
in u
se
3 .
F a m
il y
p sy
c h
o p
a th
o lo
g y
a n
d
d y
sf u
n c ti
o n
4 .
C h
il d
h o
o d
tr a u
m a ti
c
e x
p e ri
e n
c e s
5 .
D e p
re ss
iv e
d is
o rd
e r
6 .
A n
x ie
ty d
is o
rd e r
7 .
A n
ti so
c ia
l
p e rs
o n
a li
ty d
is o
rd e r
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
2
V =
1
V I
= 2
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
7
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
M a rz
u k
e t
a l.
[6 3 ]
In d
iv id
u a l
re v
ie w
o f
a u
to p
sy a n
d
to x
ic o
lo g
ic a l
re c o
rd s
N o
t re
p o
rt e d
N o
T h
e p
re v
a le
n c e
o f
c o
c a in
e u
se a m
o n
g
y o
u n
g H
is p
a n
ic m
a le
s w
h o
c o
m m
it te
d
su ic
id e
w a s
4 5
% .
P e rs
o n
s w
h o
w e re
y o
u n
g ,
b la
c k
o r
H is
p a n
ic a n
d w
h o
h a d
u se
d a lc
o h
o l
im m
e d
ia te
ly b
e fo
re th
e
fa ta
l in
ju ry
w e re
m o
st li
k e ly
to h
a v
e
b e e n
re c e n
t c o
c a in
e u
se rs
. A
ft e r
c o
n tr
o ll
in g
fo r
d e m
o g
ra p
h ic
v a ri
a b
le s
a n
d a lc
o h
o l
u se
, su
b je
c ts
w h
o
c o
m m
it te
d su
ic id
e w
it h
fi re
a rm
s w
e re
tw ic
e a s
li k
e ly
to h
a v
e u
se d
c o
c a in
e a s
th o
se w
h o
u se
d o
th e r
m e th
o d
s
1 .
C o
c a in
e u
se
2 .
Y o
u n
g e r
a g
e
3 .
B la
c k
o r
H is
p a n
ic
ra c e
4 .
A lc
o h
o l
c o
n su
m p
ti o
n
im m
e d
ia te
ly b
e fo
re
th e
fa ta
l in
ju ry
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
0
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
6
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
R o
y [9
3 ]
C a se
– c o
n tr
o l
st u
d y
2 1
4 c o
c a in
e -
d e p
e n
d e n
t
p a ti
e n
ts
N o
3 9
% o
f th
e c o
c a in
e -d
e p
e n
d e n
t p
a ti
e n
ts
h a d
a tt
e m
p te
d su
ic id
e a t
so m
e ti
m e
in
th e ir
li v
e s,
m o
re o
ft e n
h a d
a fa
m il
y
h is
to ry
o f
su ic
id a l
b e h
a v
io u
r a n
d
re p
o rt
e d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
m o
re c h
il d
h o
o d
tr a u
m a .
T h
e y
a ls
o h
a d
h ig
h e r
p e rs
o n
a li
ty sc
o re
s fo
r in
tr o
v e rs
io n
,
n e u
ro ti
c is
m a n
d h
o st
il it
y ;
th e y
h a d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
m o
re c o
m o
rb id
it y
w it
h th
e
u se
o f
o th
e r
su b
st a n
c e s,
a s
w e ll
a s
p sy
c h
ia tr
ic a n
d p
h y
si c a l
d is
o rd
e rs
1 .
F a m
il y
h is
to ry
o f
su ic
id a l
b e h
a v
io u
r
2 .
C h
il d
h o
o d
tr a u
m a
3 .
In tr
o v
e rs
io n
,
n e u
ro ti
c is
m a n
d
h o
st il
it y
4 .
P sy
c h
ia tr
ic d
is o
rd e rs
5 .
P h
y si
c a l
d is
o rd
e rs
I =
2
II =
2
II I
= 0
IV =
2
V =
0
V I
= 2
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
8
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 473
123
T a
b le
1 c o
n ti
n u
e d
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
W a ld
ro p
e t
a l.
[1 1
1 ]
N a ti
o n
a l
c ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
S u
rv e y
o f
A d
o le
sc e n
ts
2 0
0 2
a d
o le
sc e n
ts
(a g
e d
1 2
– 1
7 )
N o
S a m
p le
p re
v a le
n c e s
o f
su ic
id a l
id e a ti
o n
a n
d a tt
e m
p ts
w e re
2 4
.3 a n
d 3
.3 %
,
re sp
e c ti
v e ly
, y
ie ld
in g
w e ig
h te
d
p o
p u
la ti
o n
p re
v a le
n c e
e st
im a te
s o
f 2
3 .3
a n
d 3
.1 %
. S
u ic
id a l
id e a ti
o n
w a s
p o
si ti
v e ly
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h fe
m a le
g e n
d e r,
a g
e ,
fa m
il y
, a lc
o h
o l
a n
d d
ru g
p ro
b le
m s,
v io
le n
c e
e x
p o
su re
, li
fe ti
m e
d e p
re ss
io n
a n
d P
T S
D .
S u
ic id
e a tt
e m
p ts
w e re
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h fe
m a le
g e n
d e r,
a g
e ,
se x
u a l
a n
d p
h y
si c a l
a ss
a u
lt ,
li fe
ti m
e su
b st
a n
c e
a b
u se
o r
d e p
e n
d e n
c e ,
P T
S D
a n
d d
e p
re ss
io n
1 .
P sy
c h
o p
a th
o lo
g y
2 .
F e m
a le
g e n
d e r
3 .
A g
e
4 .
S e x
u a l
a n
d p
h y
si c a l
a ss
a u
lt s
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
0
V =
1
V I
= 2
V II
= 1
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
6
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
G a rl
o w
[3 3 ];
G a rl
o w
e t
a l.
[3 4 ]
R e tr
o sp
e c ti
v e
a n
a ly
si s
o f
re c o
rd s
o f
th e
O ffi
c e
o f
th e
M e d
ic a l
E x
a m
in e r
o f
a ll
c o
m p
le te
d
su ic
id e s
4 1
6 c o
c a in
e
u se
rs
N o
A lm
o st
a ll
(9 4
.6 %
) o
f th
e su
ic id
e s
in
w h
o m
c o
c a in
e w
a s
d e te
c te
d w
e re
m a le
, 5
1 .4
% o
f th
e c o
c a in
e -p
o si
ti v
e
su ic
id e s
w e re
A fr
ic a n
A m
e ri
c a n
m e n
a n
d 4
3 .2
% w
e re
w h
it e
m e n
. M
o st
(8 6
.7 %
) o
f A
fr ic
a n
A m
e ri
c a n
te e n
a g
e rs
d id
n o
t u
se su
b st
a n
c e s
b e fo
re c o
m m
it ti
n g
su ic
id e ,
w h
e re
a s
5 0
.0 %
o f
th e
w h
it e
te e n
a g
e
v ic
ti m
s h
a d
u se
d o
n e
o r
b o
th
su b
st a n
c e s,
w it
h 4
1 .7
% o
f th
e w
h it
e
te e n
a g
e rs
h a v
in g
u se
d e th
a n
o l.
E th
a n
o l
u se
w a s
m u
c h
m o
re
c o
m m
o n
a m
o n
g w
h it
e v
ic ti
m s
o f
a ll
a g
e g
ro u
p s
1 .
B e in
g m
a le
2 .
Y o
u n
g e r
a g
e
3 .
B e in
g w
h it
e o
r
A fr
ic a n
A m
e ri
c a n
4 .
C o
c a in
e o
r e th
a n
o l
d e te
c te
d a t
a u
to p
sy
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
0
V =
2
V I
= 0
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
4
L o
w q
u a li
ty
In n
a m
o ra
ti
e t
a l.
[4 8 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
st u
d y
3 4
0 y
o u
n g
a d
u lt
s
N o
1 4
.7 %
w e re
d ru
g u
se rs
a n
d 2
4 .1
%
d ri
n k
e rs
. A
lc o
h o
l a n
d d
ru g
m is
u se
w a s
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h re
a so
n s
fo r
li v
in g
, h
o p
e le
ss n
e ss
, su
ic id
a l
a tt
it u
d e s
a n
d d
e p
re ss
io n
. A
ft e r
m u
lt ip
le
re g
re ss
io n
a n
a ly
si s,
th e
D ru
g A
b u
se
S c re
e n
in g
T e st
, th
e Z
u n
g D
e p
re ss
io n
S c a le
a n
d L
o ss
o f
M o
ti v
a ti
o n
w e re
p o
si ti
v e
p re
d ic
to rs
o f
su ic
id e
ri sk
w it
h S
u rv
iv a l
a n
d C
o p
in g
B e li
e fs
a s
n e g
a ti
v e
p re
d ic
to rs
. C
a n
n a b
is
m a y
b e
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h ri
sk y
h e a lt
h b
e h
a v
io u
r
1 .
A lc
o h
o l
a n
d d
ru g
m is
u se
2 .
H ig
h e r
sc o
re s
o n
th e
Z u
n g
D e p
re ss
io n
S c a le
3 .
L o
ss o
f m
o ti
v a ti
o n
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
2
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 2
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 0
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
474 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
T a
b le
1 c o
n ti
n u
e d
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
B e a u
tr a is
e t
a l.
[2 ]
C a se
– c o
n tr
o l
st u
d y
3 0
2 c a se
s v
s.
1 ,0
2 8
c o
n tr
o ls
N o
S u
b je
c ts
w h
o h
a d
m a d
e se
ri o
u s
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p ts
h a d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
h ig
h e r
ra te
s
o f
c a n
n a b
is a b
u se
/d e p
e n
d e n
c e
th a n
c o
m p
a ri
so n
su b
je c ts
p re
su m
a b
ly
re la
te d
to th
e so
c io
-d e m
o g
ra p
h ic
d is
a d
v a n
ta g
e s
a n
d d
is a d
v a n
ta g
e d
c h
il d
h o
o d
fa m
il y
c ir
c u
m st
a n
c e s.
A ft
e r
c o
n tr
o ll
in g
fo r
c o
n fo
u n
d in
g fa
c to
rs a n
d
c o
m o
rb id
p sy
c h
ia tr
ic d
is o
rd e r,
th e
o d
d s
ra ti
o b
e tw
e e n
c a n
n a b
is a b
u se
/
d e p
e n
d e n
c e
a n
d m
a k
in g
a se
ri o
u s
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p t
w a s
2 .0
a n
d o
n ly
m a rg
in a ll
y st
a ti
st ic
a ll
y si
g n
ifi c a n
t
1 .
C a n
n a b
is a b
u se
/
d e p
e n
d e n
c e
2 .
S o
c io
-d e m
o g
ra p
h ic
d is
a d
v a n
ta g
e d
c h
il d
h o
o d
fa m
il y
c ir
c u
m st
a n
c e s
3 .
C o
m o
rb id
m o
o d
d is
o rd
e r,
o th
e r
su b
st a n
c e
u se
d is
o rd
e r
a n
d a n
ti so
c ia
l
p e rs
o n
a li
ty d
is o
rd e r
I =
2
II =
2
II I
= 0
IV =
2
V =
1
V I
= 2
V II
= 1
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 0
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
F e rg
u ss
o n
e t
a l.
[3 2 ]
2 1
-y e a r
lo n
g it
u d
in a l
st u
d y
1 ,2
6 5
a d
o le
sc e n
c e /
y o
u n
g a d
u lt
s
F ir
st
e v
a lu
a ti
o n
= a t
b ir
th
T 1
= 4
m o
n th
s
T 2
= 1
y e a r
T 3
= a n
n u
a l
in te
rv a ls
u p
to
a g
e 1
6 y
e a rs
T 4
= a t
a g
e
1 8
y e a rs
T 5
= a t
2 1
y e a rs
R e g
u la
r c a n
n a b
is u
se w
a s
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h
a d
ra m
a ti
c in
c re
a se
in th
e ri
sk o
f o
th e r
il li
c it
d ru
g u
se ,
e v
e n
w h
e n
c o
n fo
u n
d in
g
v a ri
a b
le s
w e re
ta k
e n
in to
a c c o
u n
t. In
a d
d it
io n
, re
g u
la r
c a n
n a b
is a b
u se
w a s
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h in
c re
a se
s in
d e li
n q
u e n
c y
, d
e p
re ss
io n
a n
d su
ic id
a l
b e h
a v
io u
r. T
h e
a d
v e rs
e e ff
e c ts
o f
c a n
n a b
is o
n a d
ju st
m e n
t se
e m
e d
to b
e
m o
st p
ro n
o u
n c e d
fo r
y o
u n
g e r
u se
rs a n
d
d e c li
n e d
w it
h in
c re
a si
n g
a g
e
1 .
C a n
n a b
is u
se
2 .
Y o
u n
g e r
a g
e
3 .
D e li
n q
u e n
c y
in
c a n
n a b
is u
se rs
4 .
D e p
re ss
io n
in
c a n
n a b
is u
se rs
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 2
IV =
2
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 2
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 2
G o
o d
q u
a li
ty
R e y
e t
a l.
[8 9 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
st u
d y
1 ,2
6 1
a d
o le
sc e n
ts
u si
n g
c a n
n a b
is
N o
1 /4
o f
th e
sa m
p le
re p
o rt
e d
h a v
in g
u se
d
c a n
n a b
is a n
d m
a le
s w
e re
tw ic
e a s
li k
e ly
a s
fe m
a le
s to
h a v
e u
se d
c a n
n a b
is b
e fo
re
th e
a g
e o
f 1
3 .
A n
a ss
o c ia
ti o
n b
e tw
e e n
d e p
re ss
io n
a n
d c a n
n a b
is u
se w
a s
fo u
n d
.
C a n
n a b
is u
se in
c re
a se
d th
e in
c id
e n
c e
o f
d is
ru p
ti v
e b
e h
a v
io u
rs su
c h
a s
c o
n d
u c t
p ro
b le
m s,
to b
a c c o
sm o
k in
g ,
e x
c e ss
iv e
d ri
n k
in g
a n
d th
e u
se o
f il
li c it
d ru
g s
1 .
B e in
g m
a le
2 .
D e p
re ss
io n
3 .
C o
n d
u c t
p ro
b le
m s,
to b
a c c o
sm o
k in
g ,
e x
c e ss
iv e
d ri
n k
in g
a n
d e x
c e ss
iv e
u se
o f
il li
c it
d ru
g s
in
c a n
n a b
is u
se rs
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
2
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
8
M o
d e ra
te
q u
a li
ty
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 475
123
T a
b le
1 c o
n ti
n u
e d
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
C h
a b
ro l
e t
a l.
[1 8 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
st u
d y
2 4
8 h
ig h
sc h
o o
l
st u
d e n
ts
N o
T h
o se
w h
o h
a d
u se
d c a n
n a b
is a t
le a st
o n
c e
in th
e la
st si
x m
o n
th s
h a d
si g
n ifi
c a n
tl y
h ig
h e r
ra te
s o
f su
ic id
a l
b e h
a v
io u
r, d
e p
re ss
io n
sy m
p to
m s
a n
d
a n
x ie
ty sy
m p
to m
s c o
m p
a re
d to
n o
n -
u se
rs .
C a n
n a b
is u
se a p
p e a re
d to
b e
a n
in d
e p
e n
d e n
t p
re d
ic to
r o
f su
ic id
a l
b e h
a v
io u
r a ft
e r
c o
n tr
o ll
in g
fo r
d e p
re ss
io n
a n
d a n
x ie
ty sy
m p
to m
s
1 .
C a n
n a b
is u
se
2 .
D e p
re ss
io n
sy m
p to
m s
a n
d a n
x ie
ty
sy m
p to
m s
in c a n
n a b
is
u se
rs
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
1
V =
0
V I
= 0
V II
= 2
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
5
L o
w q
u a li
ty
E p
st e in
a n
d
S p
ir it
o
[3 0 ]
C ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
st u
d y
1 3
,9 1
7 h
ig h
sc h
o o
l
st u
d e n
ts
N o
E a rl
y a lc
o h
o l
o n
se t,
h a v
in g
h a d
se x
b e fo
re a g
e 1
3 ,
in je
c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se a n
d
b e in
g fo
rc e d
to h
a v
e se
x w
e re
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h su
ic id
a li
ty a c ro
ss
g e n
d e r.
S m
o k
in g
in g
ir ls
w a s
a ss
o c ia
te d
w it
h m
a k
in g
a p
la n
to
a tt
e m
p t
su ic
id e
a n
d a c tu
a l
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p ts
. F
ig h
ti n
g w
a s
re la
te d
to
su ic
id a li
ty fo
r g
ir ls
, w
h il
e fi
g h
ti n
g in
sc h
o o
l w
a s
re la
te d
to su
ic id
a li
ty fo
r
b o
y s
1 .
E a rl
y a lc
o h
o l
o n
se t
2 .
H a v
in g
h a d
se x
b e fo
re a g
e 1
3
3 .
In je
c ti
o n
d ru
g u
se
4 .
B e in
g fo
rc e d
to h
a v
e
se x
5 .
S m
o k
in g
in g
ir ls
6 .
F ig
h ti
n g
fo r
g ir
ls a n
d
fi g
h ti
n g
in sc
h o
o l
fo r
b o
y s
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 0
IV =
1
V =
0
V I
= 2
V II
= 0
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
5
L o
w q
u a li
ty
P ri
c e
e t
a l.
[8 6 ]
L o
n g
it u
d in
a l
st u
d y
to g
e th
e r
w it
h a
c ro
ss -s
e c ti
o n
a l
in v
e st
ig a ti
o n
u si
n g
th e
N a ti
o n
a l
C a u
se o
f D
e a th
R e g
is te
r to
c o
rr e c tl
y id
e n
ti fy
6 0
0
su ic
id e s
a n
d u
n d
e te
rm in
e d
d e a th
s
5 0
,0 8
7 m
a le
m il
it a ry
c o
n sc
ri p
ts
3 3
-y e a r
fo ll
o w
-u p
5 ,3
8 0
(1 0
.7 %
) o
f su
b je
c ts
a d
m it
te d
to
h a v
in g
u se
d c a n
n a b
is w
h il
e 4
1 ,3
9 4
(8 2
.6 %
) h
a d
n o
t. T
h e
a ss
o c ia
ti o
n
b e tw
e e n
c a n
n a b
is u
se a n
d ri
sk fo
r
su ic
id e
w a s
p re
se n
t u
si n
g a
c ru
d e
a n
a ly
si s
(c ru
d e
O R
fo r
‘e v
e r
u se
’ 1
.6 2
,
9 5
% C
I 1
.2 8
– 2
.0 7
), b
u t
a ft
e r
a d
ju st
m e n
t fo
r so
c ia
l a n
d p
e rs
o n
a l
fa c to
rs ,
th e y
fa il
e d
to c o
n fi
rm th
e
in c re
a se
d ri
sk fo
r su
ic id
e in
c a n
n a b
is
u se
rs (a
d ju
st e d
O R
= 0
.8 8
, 9
5 %
C I
0 .6
5 –
1 .2
0 ).
A si
g n
ifi c a n
t a ss
o c ia
ti o
n
w a s
fo u
n d
b e tw
e e n
th e
u se
o f
o th
e r
d ru
g s,
in st
e a d
o f
c a n
n a b
is ,
w it
h
u n
d e te
rm in
e d
d e a th
s (a
d ju
st e d
O R
= 2
.0 6
, 9
5 %
C I
1 .1
1 –
3 .8
0 )
b u
t n
o t
w it
h d
e fi
n it
e su
ic id
e s
(a d
ju st
e d
O R
= 1
.1 3
, 9
5 %
C I
0 .7
3 –
1 .7
5 )
1 .
U se
o f
o th
e r
d ru
g s
th a n
c a n
n a b
is
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 2
IV =
2
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 1
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 1
G o
o d
q u
a li
ty
476 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
T a
b le
1 c o
n ti
n u
e d
S tu
d y
D e si
g n
S a m
p le
si z e
E v
e n
tu a l
fo ll
o w
-u p
C o
n c lu
si o
n s
M a in
ri sk
fa c to
rs Q
u a li
ty
sc o
re
Q u
a li
ty
d if
fe re
n ti
a ti
o n
P e d
e rs
e n
[7 5 ]
L o
n g
it u
d in
a l
st u
d y
2 0
3 3
y o
u n
g
a d
u lt
s
1 3
-y e a r
fo ll
o w
-u p
N o
a ss
o c ia
ti o
n b
e tw
e e n
e a rl
y
a d
o le
sc e n
c e ,
su ic
id a li
ty a n
d la
te r
d e p
re ss
io n
, w
h il
e in
th e
g ro
u p
in th
e ir
tw e n
ti e s,
a h
ig h
ly si
g n
ifi c a n
t
a ss
o c ia
ti o
n w
a s
fo u
n d
b e tw
e e n
c a n
n a b
is u
se ,
su ic
id e
id e a ti
o n
a n
d
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p ts
e v
e n
a ft
e r
c o
n tr
o ll
in g
fo r
c o
n fo
u n
d in
g fa
c to
rs .
S u
b je
c ts
w h
o
h a d
u se
d c a n
n a b
is 1
1 ?
ti m
e s
d u
ri n
g
th e
p a st
1 2
m o
n th
s h
a d
a n
O R
fo r
la te
r
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p ts
o f
2 .9
(9 5
% C
I
1 .3
– 6
.1 )
a n
d fo
r su
ic id
a l
id e a ti
o n
a n
O R
o f
2 .7
(9 5
% C
I 2
.8 –
6 .4
)
1 .
C a n
n a b
is u
se
2 .
Y o
u n
g e r
a g
e
I =
2
II =
0
II I
= 2
IV =
2
V =
2
V I
= 2
V II
= 1
T o
ta l
sc o
re =
1 1
G o
o d
q u
a li
ty
S tu
d ie
s w
e re
ra te
d fo
r q
u a li
ty u
si n
g th
e fo
ll o
w in
g e li
g ib
il it
y c ri
te ri
a :
(i )
th e
re p
re se
n ta
ti v
e n
e ss
o f
th e
sa m
p le
fr o
m th
e g
e n
e ra
l p
o p
u la
ti o
n (0
– 1
p o
in ts
); (i
i) th
e p
re se
n c e
o f
a c o
n tr
o l
g ro
u p
(1 o
r 2
p o
in ts
); (i
ii )
p re
se n
c e
o f
fo ll
o w
-u p [
1 y
e a r
(0 –
2 p
o in
ts );
(i v
) e v
id e n
c e -b
a se
d m
e a su
re s
o f
a ss
e ss
m e n
t (e
.g .
th e
u se
o f
th e
S C
ID -I
fo r
th e
d ia
g n
o si
s o
f th
e su
b st
a n
c e
a b
u se
/d e p
e n
d e n
c e
o r
o th
e r
p sy
c h
o m
e tr
ic e v
a lu
a ti
o n
) (0
– 2
p o
in ts
); (v
) th
e p
re se
n c e
o f
tw o
in d
e p
e n
d e n
t ra
te rs
w h
o b
li n
d ly
d ia
g n
o se
d th
e su
b st
a n
c e
a b
u se
/d e p
e n
d e n
c e
(0 –
2 p
o in
ts );
(v i)
a st
a ti
st ic
a l
e v
a lu
a ti
o n
o f
th e
in te
rr a te
r re
li a b
il it
y (0
– 2
p o
in ts
); (v
ii )
e v
id e n
c e -b
a se
d m
e a su
re s
fo r
a ss
e ss
in g
su ic
id e
o r
su ic
id e
a tt
e m
p ts
(0 –
2 p
o in
ts ).
Q u
a li
ty ra
ti n
g s
h a d
1 4
a s
th e
m a x
im u
m sc
o re
S tu
d ie
s w
e re
d if
fe re
n ti
a te
d in
th e
fo ll
o w
in g
w a y
: (1
) g
o o
d q
u a li
ty (B
1 1
p o
in ts
)— m
o st
o r
a ll
c ri
te ri
a b
e in
g fu
lfi ll
e d
, a n
d w
h e re
th e y
w e re
n o
t m
e t,
th e
st u
d y
c o
n c lu
si o
n s
w e re
th o
u g
h t
v e ry
u n
li k
e ly
to a lt
e r;
(2 )
m o
d e ra
te q
u a li
ty (6
– 1
1 p
o in
t) —
so m
e c ri
te ri
a b
e in
g fu
lfi ll
e d
, a n
d w
h e re
th e y
w e re
n o
t m
e t,
th e
st u
d y
c o
n c lu
si o
n s
w e re
th o
u g
h t
u n li
k e ly
to a lt
e r;
a n
d (3
) lo
w q
u a li
ty (B
5
p o
in ts
)— fe
w c ri
te ri
a w
e re
fu lfi
ll e d
, a n
d th
e c o
n c lu
si o
n s
o f
th e
st u
d y
w e re
th o
u g
h t
v e ry
li k
e ly
to a lt
e r.
C a u
ti o
n w
a s
re q
u ir
e d
in in
te rp
re ti
n g
th e
re su
lt s
o f
th e se
tr ia
ls
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 477
123
points)—some criteria being fulfilled, and where they were
not met, the study conclusions were thought unlikely to
alter; and low quality ([5 points)—few criteria were ful- filled, and the conclusions of the study were thought very
likely to alter. Caution was required in interpreting the
results of these trials.
Results
According to our quality score system, the mean quality
score of the 17 studies that were included is of 7.7 points.
Based on quality differentiation, most of studies (ten)
resulted of moderate quality, four contributions were
judged of good quality and three of low quality,
respectively.
Suicide risk in alcohol users/abusers
Some of the studies included showed an association
between alcohol use disorders and suicidal risk (Table 1).
Rey et al. [89] in a cross-sectional study on 1,261 adoles-
cents with cannabis use found a close relationship between
cannabis use and excessive drinking plus cannabis use
increasing the incidence of disruptive behaviours.
Garlow [33] and Garlow et al. [34] in a retrospective
analysis found that ethanol use was much more common
among white completed suicides of all age groups. The
authors reported that 50.0% of the white teenage victims
had used ethanol or cocaine alone or both ethanol and
cocaine, with most of them (41.7%) having used predom-
inantly ethanol.
In 2008, Innamorati et al. [48] performed a cross-sec-
tional study of 340 young adults and reported that 24.1%
were drinkers. Alcohol misuse was significantly associated
with reasons for living, hopelessness, suicidal attitudes and
depression. After multiple regression analysis, the Drug
Abuse Screening Test was a positive predictor of suicide
risk.
Epstein and Spirito [30] in a cross-sectional study on
13,917 high school students later reported that early alco-
hol use onset was significantly associated with suicidality
across gender.
Suicide risk in other substance users/abusers
Several other studies showed an association between sub-
stance use disorders (SUD) and suicidal risk. Beautrais
et al. [2] in a case–control study on 302 cases versus 1,028
controls found that subjects who had made serious suicide
attempts had significantly higher rates of cannabis abuse/
dependence than comparison subjects presumably due to
the socio-demographic disadvantages and to childhood
adverse family circumstances. After controlling for con-
founding factors, the odds ratio between cannabis abuse/
dependence and making a serious suicide attempt was 2.0.
Fergusson et al. [32], in a 21-year longitudinal study con-
ducted on a sample of 1,265 adolescence/young adults,
reported that regular cannabis use was associated with a
increased risk of other illicit drug use, increases in delin-
quency, depression and suicidal behaviour.
Also, Rey et al. [89], in a cross-sectional study on 1,261
adolescents, have found that 25% reported having used
cannabis and males were twice as likely as females to
have used cannabis before the age of 13. Additionally, an
association between depression and cannabis use was
reported.
Pedersen [75], in a 13-year follow-up study conducted in
a sample of 2,033 young adults, found a highly significant
association between cannabis use, suicide ideation and
suicide attempts even after controlling for confounding
factors. Subjects who had used cannabis 11 times or more
during the past 12 months had an OR of 2.9 for later sui-
cide attempts and an OR of 2.7 for suicidal ideation.
However, not all studies included in the present review
reported a positive correlation between cannabis use and
suicidal risk. Price et al. [86], in a 33-year follow-up study
conducted together with a cross-sectional investigation
using the National Cause of Death Register on 50,087 male
military conscripts, reported that after adjustment for social
and personal confounding factors, the increased risk for
suicide was not confirmed in cannabis users (adjusted
OR = 0.88). They instead suggested that a significant
association exists between the use of other additional
drugs, instead of cannabis, and undetermined deaths
(adjusted OR = 2.06) but not definite suicides (adjusted
OR = 1.13).
Some studies have reported an association between
heroin/opiate-dependent patients and suicidal risk. Darke
and Ross [24] wrote a review article on this topic finding
that heroin users are 14 times more likely than peers to die
from suicide. They also attempted suicide more frequently
than those in community samples.
Kalyoncu et al. [50], in a cross-sectional study of 108
young adult heroin-dependent inpatients, reported that both
the female and male suicide attempters were significantly
younger at the onset of heroin use compared to those who
had not attempted suicide. They concluded that the starting
age of heroin use may be a risk factor for suicide attempts.
Also, Roy [94], in a case–control study comparing 246
opiate-dependent patients who had and had not attempted
suicide, found that significantly more of the opiate-
dependent patients who had attempted suicide had a family
history of both completed and attempted suicide. Opiate-
dependent patients who had attempted suicide reported
significantly more childhood emotional, physical, sexual
478 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
abuse and emotional and physical neglect, and they were
predominantly female, unemployed, significantly more
introverted, hostile and neurotic.
Havens et al. [42] conducted a cross-sectional study
investigating the suicidal ideation in injection drug users
(IDUs). They investigated a sample of 244 injection drug
users and 73 non-injection drug users (NIDUs) finding
that suicidal ideation was present in 27% of the IDUs
versus 14% of the NIDUs. However, after controlling for
confounding factors, the association was no longer sig-
nificant. The authors suggested that psychiatric disorders,
sexual orientation and isolation which are frequent
among IDUs may represent risk factors for increased
suicidal ideation.
Marzuk et al. [63], in an individual review of autopsy
and toxicological records, have reported that the preva-
lence of cocaine use among young Hispanic males who
committed suicide was 45%. Young, black or Hispanic
males who had used alcohol immediately before the fatal
injury were most likely to have been recent cocaine users.
After controlling for demographic variables and alcohol
use, subjects who committed suicide with firearms were
twice as likely to have used cocaine as those who used
other methods.
Roy [93], investigating 214 cocaine-dependent patients,
found that at least 39% of the cocaine-dependent patients
had attempted suicide, more often had a family history of
suicidal behaviour and reported significantly more child-
hood trauma. Cocaine-dependent patients also had higher
personality scores for introversion, neuroticism and hos-
tility and had significantly more comorbidity of substance
use and psychiatric and physical disorders.
Finally, the National Survey of Adolescents, conducted
to assess several suicidal risk factors, recruited 2002 ado-
lescents (aged 12–17) from the general population. Major
depressive episodes, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
and SUD were positively associated with an increased risk
for suicide attempts (as were female gender, age and
experience of sexual and physical assaults) [111].
Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse
among adolescent completed suicides
Back in the 1980s, Shafii and colleagues [103] reported a
dramatic increase in the referral of children and adolescents
with suicidal behaviour to their Child Psychiatric Service
in Louisville. They undertook psychological autopsies of
all children and adolescents who committed suicide as
determined by the Jefferson County coroner between 1980
and 1983. Twenty-four cases satisfied the criteria, but only
83% of the families agreed to participate in the study.
Compared to matched controls, suicides were more likely
to use non-prescribed drugs or alcohol (70 vs. 24%).
Marttunen et al. [62] investigated the prevalence of
mental disorders among 53 adolescent suicides in a
nationwide psychological autopsy study in Finland. The
authors reported that 26% of the suicides had alcohol abuse
or dependence. A more recent study of 106 adolescent
suicides aged 13–22 years old [78] indicated that 42% of
the victims had an alcohol use disorder or diagnostically
subthreshold alcohol misuse (16% alcohol abuse and 11%
alcohol dependence).
Brent et al. [11] investigated the psychiatric risk factors
for adolescent suicides in 67 suicides from 28 counties of
Western Pennsylvania. Suicides had an odds risk of 8.5 of
having substance abuse compared to matched controls. The
risk was even higher when substance abuse was comorbid
with affective disorders (OR = 17.0 vs. 3.3). Brent et al.
[10] also investigated the characteristics of 27 adolescent
suicides from the Pittsburgh area. The authors found higher
incidences of alcohol and drug misuse in the suicides (40.7
vs. 17.9% as best estimate for overall substance abuse, and
37.0 vs. 16.1%, and 29.6 vs. 14.3%, respectively, for
alcohol abuse and other drug abuse).
More recently, Renaud et al. [88] compared fifty-five
adolescents who committed suicide with a control group of
living subjects using psychological autopsies. The preva-
lence rates for current substance and alcohol abuse were
13% (OR = 5.365) for the suicides compared to 3% for the
control group. Furthermore, current mood disorders were
more common in suicides than in living subjects, 33 and
2%, respectively.
Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse
among adolescent suicide attempters
Several research studies have indicated that suicide
attempts are common in adolescents with SUD [5, 17,
26], and that substance use is common in those seeking
treatment for suicidal behaviour [29–31, 106, 112]. Vajda
and Steinbeck [107], in a retrospective record review of
112 adolescents (13–20 years old) who presented after a
suicide attempt at an emergency department, found that
35% met the criteria for an alcohol use disorder and 27%
met criteria for an SUD at the time of the attempt.
Moreover, the study found that a diagnosis of alcohol
abuse increased the risk of a repeat suicide attempt
threefold, while a diagnosis of illicit drug abuse increased
the risk of a repeat suicide attempt fourfold in the sub-
sequent 12 months. Spirito et al. [106] reported that 12%
of adolescent suicide attempters (12–18 years old) who
presented at an emergency department met the criteria for
an alcohol use disorder (6% alcohol abuse and 6% alco-
hol dependence) and 18% met the criteria for cannabis
use disorder (8.4% cannabis abuse and 9.6% cannabis
dependence).
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 479
123
Waldrop et al. [111] found that the weighted population
prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempts was 23.3 and
3.1%, respectively. The Mexican Adolescent Mental
Health Survey found associations between suicidal
attempts and drug use/abuse (OR = 1.1 and 3.8, respec-
tively), and alcohol use and abuse (OR = 2.4 and 5.4,
respectively) [67]. Furthermore, in this cohort, the onset of
substance exposure and attempting suicide occurred in the
same year in 42% for the use of drugs and in 14% for the
use of alcohol.
Suicide, substance abuse and other psychiatric
disorders: comorbidity matters
Co-occurring substance use and other psychiatric problems
are a prominent characteristic of those seeking help at
mental health services [13, 15, 44, 80, 91]. In a clinical
population of adolescents from substance abuse treatment
settings, Diamond and colleagues [27] found that 72% of
adolescent marijuana users had two or more psychiatric
disorders when entering treatment. In a case–control study
of adolescents with alcohol dependence, compared with
adolescents residing in the community without alcohol
dependence, Clark et al. [20] found that the most common
types of psychopathology observed in alcohol-dependent
adolescents included conduct disorder, ADHD, major
depressive disorder and PTSD.
Comorbidity increases the risk of suicidal behaviour and
the severity of the psychiatric illness, especially mood
disorders [8, 9, 11, 52, 56] and disruptive behaviour dis-
orders [38, 62].
Harrington et al. [40] found that depression in childhood
was a strong predictor of a suicide attempt in early adult
life. The risk is increased when depression is associated
with drug abuse, cognitive distortions, hopelessness and
low self-esteem, a passive coping style, social maladjust-
ment, interpersonal problems and familial and environ-
mental stresses [6].
Goldstein et al. [36] who studied 249 adolescents (aged
12–17 years) with bipolar disorders (BD) in a long-term
naturalistic study found that the lifetime prevalence of
SUD was 16% in these adolescents and that cannabis use
disorder was the most common form of SUD, followed by
alcohol use disorder. They also found that conduct disorder
was significantly associated with SUD and may be con-
sidered a predictor of SUD among adolescents with BD.
Moreover, they reported that SUD was associated with an
increased risk for suicidal behaviour and troubles with the
police (similar to results with adults with BD). In adoles-
cent females with BD, SUD was associated with an
increased rate of pregnancy and abortion.
Discussion
The high incidence of completed and attempted suicide in
substance abusers, as well as the elevated comorbidity
between suicide, substance abuse and psychiatric condi-
tions among adolescents, forces clinicians to deal with a
difficult task. Given the association between substance
abuse and suicidality, the next question is why are these
two behaviours associated.
Substance abuse is a well-known risk factor for attempt-
ing suicide, but some authors raise the question of whether it
is a proximal or a distal risk factor. Hufford [46] suggested
that the acute effects of intoxication may represent a proxi-
mal risk factor for suicidal behaviour. There is evidence that
excessive alcohol use heightens psychological distress,
aggressiveness and suicide-specific alcohol expectancies
and inhibits adaptive coping strategies. This additional bur-
den may be sufficient to move suicidal thoughts into action.
Support for this theory comes from research suggesting that
adolescents who make fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts
exhibit elevated rates of alcohol use and intoxication at the
time of the attempt [43, 55, 61, 95].
However, substance use may also function as a more
distal risk factor for suicidal behaviour [46]. Hufford [46]
suggested that SUD may be associated with increased
stress and co-occurring psychopathology, which in turn
increases the risk of suicidal behaviour [105]. Some studies
reported that substance use among adolescents is positively
related to heightened levels of stress across many areas of
life. For example, it has been associated with poor aca-
demic performance, legal and disciplinary problems and
interpersonal conflicts among adolescents [56, 71]. There-
fore, some adolescents who attempt suicide may be moti-
vated by a desire to escape from unbearable stressors,
difficulties or aversive self-awareness such as the realiza-
tion of inadequacies and unmet expectations [37].
Bukstein et al. [14] investigated the risk factors for
suicide in 23 adolescent suicides compared to 12 commu-
nity controls with a lifetime history of substance abuse.
They found that suicides were more likely to be active
substance abusers and to have comorbid major depression,
suicidal ideation within the past week, a family history of
depression and substance abuse, legal problems and the
presence of lethal weapons in the home than controls.
Following Bukstein et al. [14], three main hypotheses can
be postulated to explain the escalation process in substance
use and suicide:
1. Substance abuse ? breakdown in personal relation- ships ? increased suicide risk;
2. Substance abuse ? change in mood ? suicidal idea- tion or depression ? suicide attempt;
480 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
3. Substance abuse ? intoxicating effects ? impaired judgement ? increased suicide risk.
The presence of a mood disorder (depression or hypo-
mania) may also determine the onset of a secondary sub-
stance use. Following the hypothesis of ‘self-medication’,
some authors have suggested that suicidal behaviour could
also be a reflection of an underlying mood disorder [46].
Some vulnerable individuals with painful affective states
due to psychiatric conditions or having some affective
temperaments traits [82] seem to be predisposed to addic-
tion. The ‘self-medication’ properties of some substances
may reduce stress [57] or increase the drive to use drugs
[54, 90, 98]. A mechanism of ‘relief/escape’ may be fre-
quently associated with both the choice of suicidal and
substance use behaviours.
Moeller et al. [68] described poor impulse control as a
core behavioural feature of SUD and reported impulsivity
as a behavioural characteristic of suicidal subjects [28, 45,
60]. In one study, even after controlling for hopelessness,
neuroticism, external locus of control and extroversion,
poor impulse control remained significantly associated
with adolescent suicidal behaviour [3]. Several authors
have shown that poor impulse control may predict suicidal
behaviour [1, 28, 45, 60, 85].
In adolescents and young adults, traumatic events (a
poor family environment and interpersonal and intraper-
sonal events), which have been shown to contribute to
suicide risk [41], are frequent. Stressful life events are risk
factors both for suicidal behaviour and for the onset/esca-
lation of substance use [72, 108, 113]. Negative conse-
quences often result from a combination of poor impulse
control, stressful life events, suicidal behaviour and sub-
stance use [12, 23, 87].
Both acute effects (judgment impairment, reduced
inhibitions and worse impulse control) [58] and long-term
effects (neurocognitive dysfunctions and reduced behav-
ioural control) may increase the risk for suicidal behav-
iour [12, 99, 102, 110]. Adolescent substance users often
experience behavioural, affective and cognitive changes,
resulting in dysregulation of aggression, sensation seeking
and impulsivity [19, 64, 65]. Finally, altered serotonergic
functioning has also been found in suicides and suicide
attempts [59, 60, 105]. Alterations in serotonergic func-
tioning have also been found to be associated with the
abuse of some substances [70]. Initial abnormalities in
serotonin regulation, together with cell signalling and
signal modulation related to the differential expression of
the serotonin transporter and low levels of brain seroto-
nin, may increase with an increase of substance use [98].
Volkow [109] has suggested that physiological changes
such as serotonergic abnormalities secondary to substance
abuse may gradually worsen mood, increasing the
likelihood of suicidal behaviours, particularly in vulnera-
ble populations.
Dawes et al. [25] proposed a developmental-transac-
tional model integrating a stress-diathesis model [58]
including precursors, prominent risk factors and also pos-
sible mechanisms involved in suicidal behaviour. They
suggested that precursors such as familial factors lead to
neuroticism, hopelessness, mood symptoms and then to
depression while other precursors produce altered serotonin
function and deficits in executive functioning resulting in
impulsive-aggressive traits. Three possible causal path-
ways underlying the vulnerabilities leading to adolescent
suicidal behaviours and having bidirectional interactions
were reported: (1) stressful life events $ genetic markers of serotonin dysregulation $ suicide attempts, (2) sub- stance use $ impulsivity and (3) substance use $ suicide attempts.
Mood disorders interacting with stressful life events
may lead in adolescents first to suicidal ideation and then to
suicide attempts. Recent findings in adolescents and young
adults have demonstrated that functional serotonin trans-
porter polymorphisms interacting with stressful life events
may predict depression, suicidality [16] and substance
abuse [21, 51, 74]. As Bridge [12] suggested, the presence
of other risk factors, such as current drug intoxication,
exposure to suicide or availability of a lethal agent, may
increase the risk of suicidal behaviour.
Finally, another hypothesis such as a desire to escape
problems or the above-mentioned desire for ‘self-medica-
tion’ [46, 53] may be proposed to explain the co-occur-
rence of suicidal and substance use behaviours.
That in young substance users, often aggravated by
stigmatizing attitudes [79], contributes to the excess of
mortality in adolescence.
In the meantime, a proper assessment based on the
evaluation of the most relevant specific risk factors and
aimed at identifying those individuals considered to be at
risk is crucial. Several risk factors for suicide must be
assessed. The frequency of drug use, as well as environ-
mental stressors, should be carefully considered by clini-
cians when approaching patients with comorbid SUD and
suicidal risk because they can significantly impact an
adolescent’s emotional well-being. The burden of the
comorbid psychopathology should not be ignored. The
presence of multiple coexisting disorders can be considered
to be a strong predictor of poor outcome in substance users,
increasing both the risk of suicidal behaviour and the
severity of substance abuse.
An investigation of access to lethal weapons, especially
firearms, in the home is necessary. A recent paper [49]
reported that four-fifths of adolescent suicides took place in
the decedents’ homes, and most of the firearms were owned
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 481
123
by parents, highlighting the importance of limiting youth
access to firearms. Overall, the presence of available fire-
arms is a relevant factor in establishing the risk of suicidal
behaviour.
Sometimes, in acute cases, hospitalization may be
required; in this case, treatment should be individualized to
address the myriad of potential diagnoses [92]. There is
frequently a need for multi-modal treatment including
group, family, individual and milieu therapy, as well as
crisis-oriented interventions.
The CDC’s National Centre for Injury Prevention and
Control has published a programme with guidelines for
intervention strategies for communities that are interested
in developing prevention programmes for adolescents [73].
The strategies for suicide prevention for adolescents con-
centrate on two general themes: strategies to identify sub-
jects at risk so as to direct them to healthcare centres and
strategies to increase their social support network and their
management of stress.
Patients often avoid bringing up their suicidal thoughts
and plans, but they are more willing to discuss these if the
clinician asks specific questions about any intention to
commit suicide [83, 84]. Educating general practitioners
[96], nurses [81] and paediatricians [104] about suicide,
depression and substance abuse can have a major impact on
how patients at risk are evaluated and managed [66]. In a
qualitative study, Bergmans et al. [4] interviewed 25
repeated substance-using suicidal patients about suicidali-
ty, substance use and service use, and also 27 emergency
department staff about their attitudes when providing care
to these men. There was frequently a negative interaction
between the two groups due to feelings of frustration
experienced by the emergency department staff. Moreover,
suicidal patients seemed not to be able to express their
needs and feelings during crises. This can be ameliorated
by the inclusion of social workers as part of the emergency
department team when working with suicidal patients.
One of the most effective strategies for suicide pre-
vention is to teach people how to recognize and respond to
the signals of suicidal tendencies since this increases the
likelihood of at-risk youths seeking help. Everyone can be
a source of encouragement, strength and optimism, teach-
ing and practising problem-solving methods with the
affected person and inculcating a sense of optimism [115].
Treatment compliance is another critical problem,
although only few studies have focused on the long-term
consequences of treatment non-adherence. Groholt and
Ekberg [39] conducted a 9-year follow-up study in a
population of 71 adolescents who had attempted suicide.
They found that 44% of the adolescents made another
suicide attempt; the majority of them received psychiatric
treatment but about half of them attended fewer than three
sessions.
This review should be considered in the light of the
following limitations. First, meta-analytic techniques were
not used to evaluate the results of the research. Second, the
authors chose to report those studies that could support a
broad analysis of the topic. Despite the careful and sys-
tematic search, a number of additional papers may have
been missed. The heterogeneity of the studies presented a
challenge for quality assessment. However, studies inclu-
ded in this review were assessed for quality allowing us to
ascertain the relative contribution of each study to the
systematic review.
The majority of the studies raised many questions
without giving definitive answers. Bias may be introduced
by the inclusion of cross-sectional studies of highly
selected clinical samples. Prospective studies of samples
from clinical settings would permit the investigation of the
timing, duration, and severity of predictors of suicidal
behaviour in populations of substance abusers [114].
The relationship between suicide and drug use in ado-
lescents over time is not necessarily linear, and rates of
adolescent substance abuse have fluctuated in recent dec-
ades [49]. Similarly, the drugs abused vary over time.
Finally, research on adolescent suicide and substance abuse
has been confounded by changes in diagnostic criteria, lack
of age-specific criteria to diagnose adolescent SUD,
changes and advances in the treatment of adolescent sub-
stance abuse and a failure to investigate the presence of
substance use in the earlier studies of adolescent suicidal
behaviour [92].
Conclusions
In summary, the present review confirmed the frequent
association between substance use/abuse and adolescent
suicidal behaviour. Remedying the actual deficits of the
research about the association between suicidal behaviour
and SUD as well as exploring possibilities for making
suicide prevention more effective in clinically at-risk
groups are key issues for the future. Future longitudinal
studies, including samples from epidemiologically repre-
sentative populations as well as clinical samples, are
required to better understand how targeted resources can be
selectively oriented to particular at-risk groups.
Conflict of interest None.
References
1. Apter A, Bleich A, Plutchik R, Mendelsohn S, Tyano S (1988)
Suicidal behavior, depression, and conduct disorder in hospi-
talized adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
27(6):696–699
482 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
2. Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Mulder RT (1999) Cannabis abuse and
serious suicide attempts. Addiction 94(8):1155–1164
3. Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Mulder RT (1999) Personality traits
and cognitive styles as risk factors for serious suicide attempts
among young people. Suicide Life Threat Behav 29(1):37–47
4. Bergmans Y, Spence JM, Strike C, Links PS, Ball JS, Rufo C,
Rhodes AE, Watson WJ, Eynan R (2009) Repeat substance-
using suicidal clients-how can we be helpful? Soc Work Health
Care 48(4):420–431
5. Berman AL, Schwartz RH (1990) Suicide attempts among
adolescent drug users. Am J Dis Child 144(3):310–314
6. Bolognini M, Plancherel B, Laget J, Halfon O (2003) Adoles-
cent’s suicide attempts: populations at risk, vulnerability, and
substance use. Subst Use Misuse 38(11–13):1651–1669
7. Brent DA (1995) Risk factors for adolescent suicide and suicidal
behavior: mental and substance abuse disorders, family envi-
ronmental factors, and life stress. Suicide Life Threat Behav
25(Suppl):52–63
8. Brent DA, Johnson B, Bartle S, Bridge J, Rather C, Matta J,
Connolly J, Constantine D (1993) Personality disorder, tendency
to impulsive violence, and suicidal behavior in adolescents.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(1):69–75
9. Brent DA, Kolko DJ, Wartella ME, Boylan MB, Moritz G,
Baugher M, Zelenak JP (1993) Adolescent psychiatric inpa-
tients’ risk of suicide attempt at 6-month follow-up. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(1):95–105
10. Brent DA, Perper JA, Goldstein CE, Kolko DJ, Allan MJ, All-
man CJ, Zelenak JP (1988) Risk factors for adolescent suicide.
A comparison of adolescent suicide victims with suicidal inpa-
tients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45(6):581–588
11. Brent DA, Perper JA, Moritz G, Allman C, Friend A, Roth C,
Schweers J, Balach L, Baugher M (1993) Psychiatric risk factors
for adolescent suicide: a case-control study. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry 32(3):521–529
12. Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA (2006) Adolescent suicide
and suicidal behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
47(3–4):372–394
13. Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW Jr, Bigelow GE
(1997) Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treat-
ment-seeking opioid abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54(1):71–80
14. Bukstein OG, Brent DA, Perper JA, Moritz G, Baugher M,
Schweers J, Roth C, Balach L (1993) Risk factors for completed
suicide among adolescents with a lifetime history of substance
abuse: a case-control study. Acta Psychiatr Scand
88(6):403–408
15. Bukstein OG, Glancy LJ, Kaminer Y (1992) Patterns of affec-
tive comorbidity in a clinical population of dually diagnosed
adolescent substance abusers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psy-
chiatry 31(6):1041–1045
16. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig IW, Harrington
H, McClay J, Mill J, Martin J, Braithwaite A, Poulton R (2003)
Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a poly-
morphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301(5631):386–389
17. Cavaiola AA, Lavender N (1999) Suicidal behavior in chemi-
cally dependent adolescents. Adolescence 34(136):735–744
18. Chabrol H, Chauchard E, Girabet J (2008) Cannabis use and
suicidal behaviours in high-school students. Addict Behav
33(1):152–155
19. Clark DB, Cornelius JR, Kirisci L, Tarter RE (2005) Childhood
risk categories for adolescent substance involvement: a general
liability typology. Drug Alcohol Depend 77(1):13–21
20. Clark DB, Pollock N, Bukstein OG, Mezzich AC, Bromberger
JT, Donovan JE (1997) Gender and comorbid psychopathology
in adolescents with alcohol dependence. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry 36(9):1195–1203
21. Covault J, Tennen H, Armeli S, Conner TS, Herman AI, Cil-
lessen AH, Kranzler HR (2007) Interactive effects of the sero-
tonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and stressful life
events on college student drinking and drug use. Biol Psychiatry
61(5):609–616
22. Crockett LJ, Petersen AC (1993) Adolescent development:
health risks and opportunities for health promotion. In: Millstein
SG, Petersen AC, Nightingale EO (eds) Promoting the health of
adolescents: new directions for the twenty-first century. Oxford
University Press, New York, pp 13–37
23. Dalton EJ, Cate-Carter TD, Mundo E, Parikh SV, Kennedy JL
(2003) Suicide risk in bipolar patients: the role of co-morbid
substance use disorders. Bipolar Disord 5(1):58–61
24. Darke S, Ross J (2002) Suicide among heroin users: rates, risk
factors and methods. Addiction 97(11):1383–1394
25. Dawes MA, Mathias CW, Richard DM, Hill-Kapturczak N,
Dougherty DM (2008) Adolescent suicidal behavior and sub-
stance use: developmental mechanisms. Subst Abus 2:13–28
26. Deykin EY, Buka SL (1994) Suicidal ideation and attempts
among chemically dependent adolescents. Am J Public Health
84(4):634–639
27. Diamond G, Panichelli-Mindel SM, Shera D, Dennis ML, Tims
F, Ungemack J (2006) Psychiatric syndromes in adolescents
seeking outpatient treatment for marijuana with abuse and
dependency in outpatient treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst
Abuse 15:37–54
28. Dougherty DM, Mathias CW, Marsh DM, Moeller FG, Swann
AC (2004) Suicidal behaviors and drug abuse: impulsivity and
its assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend 76(Suppl):S93–S105
29. Epstein JA, Spirito A (2009) Risk factors for suicidality among a
nationally representative sample of high school students. Suicide
Life Threat Behav 39(3):241–251
30. Epstein JA, Spirito A (2010) Gender-specific risk factors for
suicidality among high school students. Arch Suicide Res
14(3):193–205
31. Esposito-Smythers C, Spirito A (2004) Adolescent substance
use and suicidal behavior: a review with implications for treat-
ment research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28(5 Suppl):77S–88S
32. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Swain-Campbell N (2002) Can-
nabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young
adulthood. Addiction 97(9):1123–1135
33. Garlow SJ (2002) Age, gender, and ethnicity differences in
patterns of cocaine and ethanol use preceding suicide. Am J
Psychiatry 159(4):615–619
34. Garlow SJ, Purselle DC, Heninger M (2007) Cocaine and
alcohol use preceding suicide in African American and white
adolescents. J Psychiatr Res 41(6):530–536
35. Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE (2002)
Reducing suicide: a national imperative. Joseph Henry Press,
Washington
36. Goldstein BI, Strober MA, Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Esposito-
Smythers C, Goldstein TR, Leonard H, Hunt J, Gill MK, Iyengar
S, Grimm C, Yang M, Ryan ND, Keller MB (2008) Substance
use disorders among adolescents with bipolar spectrum disor-
ders. Bipolar Disord 10(4):469–478
37. Goldston DB (2004) Conceptual issues in understanding the
relationship between suicidal behavior and substance use during
adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend 76(Suppl):S79–S91
38. Gould MS, King R, Greenwald S, Fisher P, Schwab-Stone M,
Kramer R, Flisher AJ, Goodman S, Canino G, Shaffer D (1998)
Psychopathology associated with suicidal ideation and attempts
among children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
Psychiatry 37(9):915–923
39. Groholt B, Ekeberg O (2009) Prognosis after adolescent suicide
attempt: mental health, psychiatric treatment, and suicide
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 483
123
attempts in a nine-year follow-up study. Suicide Life Threat
Behav 39(2):125–136
40. Harrington R, Bredenkamp D, Groothues C, Rutter M, Fudge H,
Pickles A (1994) Adult outcomes of childhood and adolescent
depression. III. Links with suicidal behaviours. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry 35(7):1309–1319
41. Hatch SL, Dohrenwend BP (2007) Distribution of traumatic and
other stressful life events by race/ethnicity, gender, SES and
age: a review of the research. Am J Community Psychol
40:313–332
42. Havens JR, Sherman SG, Sapun M, Strathdee SA (2006) Prev-
alence and correlates of suicidal ideation among young injection
vs. noninjection drug users. Subst Use Misuse 41(2):245–254
43. Hawton K, Fagg J (1992) Deliberate self-poisoning and self-
injury in adolescents. A study of characteristics and trends in
Oxford, 1976–89. Br J Psychiatry 161:816–823
44. Hien D, Zimberg S, Weisman S, First M, Ackerman S (1997)
Dual diagnosis subtypes in urban substance abuse and mental
health clinics. Psychiatr Serv 48(8):1058–1063
45. Horesh N (2001) Self-report vs. computerized measures of
impulsivity as a correlate of suicidal behavior. Crisis
22(1):27–31
46. Hufford MR (2001) Alcohol and suicidal behavior. Clin Psychol
Rev 21(5):797–811
47. Ilomaki E, Rasanen P, Viilo K, Hakko H (2007) Suicidal
behavior among adolescents with conduct disorder—the role of
alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Res 150(3):305–311
48. Innamorati M, Pompili M, Lester D, Tatarelli R, Girardi P
(2008) Recreational drug use and suicidality among Italian
young adults. J Addict Dis 27(4):51–59
49. Johnson RM, Barber C, Azrael D, Clark DE, Hemenway D
(2010) Who are the owners of firearms used in adolescent sui-
cides? Suicide Life Threat Behav 40(6):609–611
50. Kalyoncu A, Mırsal H, Pektaş Ö, Tan D, Beyazyürek M (2007) Heroin-dependent patients attempting and not attempting sui-
cide: a comparison. Acta Neuropsychiatr 19:297–303
51. Kaufman J, Yang BZ, Douglas-Palumberi H, Crouse-Artus M,
Lipschitz D, Krystal JH, Gelernter J (2007) Genetic and envi-
ronmental predictors of early alcohol use. Biol Psychiatry
61(11):1228–1234
52. Kelly TM, Cornelius JR, Clark DB (2004) Psychiatric disorders
and attempted suicide among adolescents with substance use
disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 73(1):87–97
53. Khantzian EJ (1997) The self-medication hypothesis of sub-
stance use disorders: a reconsideration and recent applications.
Harv Rev Psychiatry 4(5):231–244
54. Koob GF, Le Moal M (2001) Drug addiction, dysregulation of
reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24:97–129
55. Kotila L, Lonnqvist J (1988) Adolescent suicide attempts: sex
differences predicting suicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand
77(3):264–270
56. Lewinsohn PM, Gotlib IH, Seeley JR (1995) Adolescent psy-
chopathology: IV. Specificity of psychosocial risk factors for
depression and substance abuse in older adolescents. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34(9):1221–1229
57. Light JM, Grube JW, Madden PA, Gover J (2003) Adolescent
alcohol use and suicidal ideation: a nonrecursive model. Addict
Behav 28(4):705–724
58. Mann JJ (2003) Neurobiology of suicidal behaviour. Nat Rev
Neurosci 4(10):819–828
59. Mann JJ, Brent DA, Arango V (2001) The neurobiology and
genetics of suicide and attempted suicide: a focus on the sero-
tonergic system. Neuropsychopharmacology 24(5):467–477
60. Mann JJ, Oquendo M, Underwood MD, Arango V (1999) The
neurobiology of suicide risk: a review for the clinician. J Clin
Psychiatry 60(Suppl 2):7–11
61. Marttunen MJ, Aro HM, Henriksson MM, Lonnqvist JK (1991)
Mental disorders in adolescent suicide. DSM-III-R axes I and II
diagnoses in suicides among 13- to 19-year-olds in Finland.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 48(9):834–839
62. Marttunen MJ, Aro HM, Henriksson MM, Lonnqvist JK (1994)
Antisocial behaviour in adolescent suicide. Acta Psychiatr
Scand 89(3):167–173
63. Marzuk PM, Tardiff K, Leon AC, Stajic M, Morgan EB, Mann
JJ (1992) Prevalence of cocaine use among residents of New
York City who committed suicide during a one-year period. Am
J Psychiatry 149(3):371–375
64. McGue M, Iacono WG, Legrand LN, Elkins I (2001) Origins
and consequences of age at first drink. II. Familial risk and
heritability. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25(8):1166–1173
65. McGue M, Iacono WG, Legrand LN, Malone S, Elkins I (2001)
Origins and consequences of age at first drink. I. Associations
with substance-use disorders, disinhibitory behavior and psy-
chopathology, and P3 amplitude. Alcohol Clin Exp Res
25(8):1156–1165
66. Mental Health and Substance Abuse (2006) Facts and figures.
Suicide prevention: emerging from darkness. Available: http://
www.searo.who.int/en/Section1174/Section1199/Section1567/
Section1824_8087.htm. Accessed 7 Jul 2011
67. Miller M, Borges G, Orozco R, Mukamal K, Rimm EB, Benjet
C, Medina-Mora ME (2010) Exposure to alcohol, drugs and
tobacco and the risk of subsequent suicidality: findings from the
Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. Drug Alcohol
Depend 113(2–3):110–117
68. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann
AC (2001) Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry
158(11):1783–1793
69. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred
reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the
PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535
70. Morgan MJ (2000) Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of its possible
persistent psychological effects. Psychopharmacology
152(3):230–248
71. Needle R, McCubbin H, Lorence J, Hochhauser M (1983)
Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a
family-based study: a methodological report. Int J Addict
18(7):901–912
72. Novins DK, Mitchell CM (1998) Factors associated with mari-
juana use among American Indian adolescents. Addiction
93(11):1693–1702
73. O’Carroll PW, Potter LB, Mercy JA (1994) Programs for the
prevention of suicide among adolescents and young adults.
MMWR Recomm Rep 43(RR-6):1–7
74. Olsson CA, Byrnes GB, Lotfi-Miri M, Collins V, Williamson R,
Patton C, Anney RJ (2005) Association between 5-HTTLPR
genotypes and persisting patterns of anxiety and alcohol use:
results from a 10-year longitudinal study of adolescent mental
health. Mol Psychiatry 10(9):868–876
75. Pedersen W (2008) Does cannabis use lead to depression and
suicidal behaviours? A population-based longitudinal study.
Acta Psychiatr Scand 118(5):395–403
76. Peters KD, Kochanek KD, Murphy SL (1998) Deaths: final data
for 1996. Natl Vital Stat Rep 47(9):1–100
77. Peterson BS, Zhang H, Santa Lucia R, King RA, Lewis M (1996)
Risk factors for presenting problems in child psychiatric emer-
gencies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35(9):1162–1173
78. Pirkola SP, Marttunen MJ, Henriksson MM, Isometsa ET,
Heikkinen ME, Lonnqvist JK (1999) Alcohol-related problems
among adolescent suicides in Finland. Alcohol Alcohol
34(3):320–329
79. Pompili M, Mancinelli I, Tatarelli R (2003) Stigma as a cause of
suicide. Br J Psychiatry 183:173–174
484 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485
123
80. Pompili M, Mancinelli I, Girardi P, Tatarelli R (2004) Pre-
venting suicide in young schizophrenics who are substance
abusers. Subst Use Misuse 39:1437–1441
81. Pompili M, Girardi P, Ruberto A, Kotzalidis GD, Tatarelli R
(2005) Emergency staff reactions to suicidal and self-harming
patients. Eur J Emerg Med 12:169–178
82. Pompili M, Girardi P, Tatarelli R, De Pisa E, Tondo L, Akiskal
KK, Akiskal HS (2008) TEMPS-A (Rome): psychometric vali-
dation of affective temperaments in clinically well subjects in
mid- and south Italy. J Affect Disord 107(1–3):63–75
83. Pompili M, Innamorati M, Del Casale A, Serafini G, Tatarelli R
(2009) La prevenzione del suicidio e il ruolo strategico dei
medici di base. SIMG 1:35–41
84. Pompili M, Rihmer Z, Innamorati M, Lester D, Girardi P, Ta-
tarelli R (2009) Assessment and treatment of suicide risk in
bipolar disorders. Expert Rev Neurother 9:109–136
85. Pompili M, Iliceto P, Luciano D, Innamorati M, Serafini G, Del
Casale A, Tatarelli R, Girardi P, Lester D (2011) Higher
hopelessness and suicide risk predict lower selfdeception among
psychiatric patients and clinically-well subjects. Riv Psichiatr
46:24–30
86. Price C, Hemmingsson T, Lewis G, Zammit S, Allebeck P
(2009) Cannabis and suicide: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry
195(6):492–497
87. Putnins AL (1995) Recent drug use and suicidal behaviour
among young offenders. Drug Alcohol Rev 14(2):151–158
88. Renaud J, Berlim MT, McGirr A, Tousignant M, Turecki G
(2008) Current psychiatric morbidity, aggression/impulsivity,
and personality dimensions in child and adolescent suicide: a
case-control study. J Affect Disord 105(1–3):221–228
89. Rey JM, Sawyer MG, Raphael B, Patton GC, Lynskey M (2002)
Mental health of teenagers who use cannabis. Results of an
Australian survey. Br J Psychiatry 180:216–221
90. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2000) The psychology and neuro-
biology of addiction: a incentive-sensitization view. Addiction
95(Suppl):S91–S117
91. Ross HE, Glaser FB, Germanson T (1988) The prevalence of
psychiatric disorders in patients with alcohol and other drug
problems. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45(11):1023–1031
92. Rowan A (2001) Adolescents substance abuse and suicide.
Depress Anxiety 14:186–191
93. Roy A (2001) Characteristics of cocaine-dependent patients who
attempt suicide. Am J Psychiatry 158(8):1215–1219
94. Roy A (2002) Characteristics of opiate dependent patients who
attempt suicide. J Clin Psychiatry 63(5):403–407
95. Runeson B (1990) Psychoactive substance use disorder in youth
suicide. Alcohol Alcohol 25(5):561–568
96. Rutz W, von Knorring L, Walinder J (1989) Frequency of sui-
cide on Gotland after systematic postgraduate education of
general practitioners. Acta Psychiatr Scand 80(2):151–154
97. SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration) (2002) Substance use and the risk of suicide
among youths. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse
Report
98. Schepis TS, Adinoff B, Rao U (2008) Neurobiological processes
in adolescent addictive disorders. Am J Addict 17:6–23
99. Schneider M, Koch M (2003) Chronic pubertal, but not adult
chronic cannabinoid treatment impairs sensorimotor gating,
recognition memory, and the performance in a progressive ratio
task in adult rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1760–1769
100. Schneider B, Schnabel A, Sargk D, Maurer K, Weber B, Wet-
terling T (2005) Detection of alcohol consumption in suicides.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 255:1–5
101. Schneider B, Wetterling T, Sargk D, Schneider F, Schnabel A,
Maurer K, Fritze J (2006) Axis I disorders and personality dis-
orders as risk factors for suicide. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin
Neurosci 256:17–27
102. Schuckit M, Schuckit J (1989) Substance use and abuse: a risk
factor in youth suicide. In: Report of the Secretary’s task force
on youth suicide, vol 2: risk factors for youth suicide (DHHS
Pub. No. (ADM) 89-1622, Washington, DC). Government
Printing Office
103. Shafii M, Carrigan S, Whittinghill JR, Derrick A (1985) Psy-
chological autopsy of completed suicide in children and ado-
lescents. Am J Psychiatry 142(9):1061–1064
104. Shain BN (2007) Suicide and suicide attempts in adolescents.
Pediatrics 120(3):669–676
105. Spirito A, Esposito-Smythers C (2006) Attempted and com-
pleted suicide in adolescence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol
2:237–266
106. Spirito A, Mehlenbeck R, Barnett N, Lewander W, Voss A
(2003) The relation of mood and behavior to alcohol use in
adolescent suicide attempters. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse
12(4):35–53
107. Vajda J, Steinbeck K (2000) Factors associated with repeat
suicide attempts among adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry
34(3):437–445
108. van den Bree MB, Pickworth WB (2005) Risk factors predicting
change in marijuana involvement in teenagers. Arch Gen Psy-
chiatry 62:311–319
109. Volkow ND (2001) Drug abuse and mental illness: progress in
understanding comorbidity. Am J Psychiatry 158(8):1181–1183
110. Volkow ND, Li TK (2005) Drugs and alcohol: treating and
preventing abuse, addiction, and their medical consequences.
Pharmacol Ther 108:3–17
111. Waldrop AE, Hanson RF, Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Naugle
AE, Saunders BE (2007) Risk factors for suicidal behavior
among a national sample of adolescents: implications for pre-
vention. J Trauma Stress 20(5):869–879
112. West BA, Swahn MH, McCarty F (2010) Children at risk for
suicide attempt and attempt-related injuries: findings from the
2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. West J Emerg Med
11:257–263
113. Windle M, Wiesner M (2004) Trajectories of marijuana use
from adolescence to young adulthood: predictors and outcomes.
Dev Psychopathol 16:1007–1027
114. Wines JD Jr, Saitz R, Horton NJ, Lloyd-Travaglini C, Samet JH
(2004) Suicidal behavior, drug use and depressive symptoms
after detoxification: a 2-year prospective study. Drug Alcohol
Depend 76(Suppl):S21–S29
115. World Health Organization (2007) Mental health and sub-
stance abuse. Facts and figures. Suicide prevention. http://www.
searo.who.int/en/section1174/section1199/section1567_6745.htm.
Accessed 4 Jan 2011
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2012) 262:469–485 485
123
- Substance abuse and suicide risk among adolescents
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Data collection
- Data extraction
- Summary measures
- Results
- Suicide risk in alcohol users/abusers
- Suicide risk in other substance users/abusers
- Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse among adolescent completed suicides
- Prevalence rates of substance use/abuse among adolescent suicide attempters
- Suicide, substance abuse and other psychiatric disorders: comorbidity matters
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Conflict of interest
- References