MM
D M M
Application: Draft Mixed-Methods Proposal
As you proceed with your doctoral studies, you will eventually be required to make a formal proposal for your doctoral research. This week, you will gain practice in creating a portion of such a proposal by drafting a mixed-methods proposal for your Instructor.
To prepare for this Assignment:
· Review Chapter 10, "Mixed Methods Procedures," in the Creswell text.
· Review the media program, Mixed Methods: An Example.
· Review Mixed Methods Design and Analysis found in the Research Design and Analysis area of the Research Resources and Tutorials webpage.
Write a 4- to 5-page paper in which you propose a mixed-methods study, addressing the following:
· Formulate relevant research questions and hypotheses.
· Can your idea be tested with any of the various types of experimental designs? Why or why not?
· What is your design? Why did you choose that design?
· What is your target population? How would you identify and recruit participants?
· What data collection method might you use? How would that data help answer your research question(s)/hypotheses?
· How consistent are these data collection methods with methods used in existing research on your topic?
· Why did you choose these methods?
· What are the alternatives?
· How would you ensure quality and reliability of the data?
· How might you analyze the data?
· What are the target audiences for your findings?
Use the following rubric to estimate your grade on the Assignment: Rubric Assignment
Top of Form
|
Criterion |
Description |
Evaluation |
Weight |
Points |
Possible Points |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Complete |
Student submits a 4- to 5-page proposal for a mixed methods research study. |
|
1 |
0 |
10 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypothesis |
Student formulates relevant research questions and hypotheses. |
|
1.7 |
0 |
17 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Design |
Student presents a design for the research study and justifies the design chosen. |
|
1.6 |
0 |
16 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Data |
Student presents the data collection method that might be used and justifies the choice; discusses how to ensure the reliability of the data. |
|
1.7 |
0 |
17 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Points Earned Out of 60 |
|
0 |
60 |
|
|
Bottom of Form
|
Evaluation |
Description |
|
9–10 |
Mastery—Exceptional, complete, clear; exceeds expectations. |
|
8 |
Competent—Complete; meets expectations. |
|
6–7 |
Developing—Approaching expectations; missing some detail, not fully developed. |
|
2–5 |
Deficient—Vague, weak; needs more detail. |
|
0 |
Absent—Not present; no assignment com |