|
Turabian Formatting
30%
|
Points: 0-29
*Follows APA or MLA guidelines, but no major errors (D level).
*Major errors in punctuation, capitalization or placement for bibliographic entries or in-text citations. (D level)
*Is not properly formatted at all (F).
*Does not include in-text citations for specific details and examples drawn from videos (plagiarism – see below).
**Plagiarism is a serious offense and can lead to serious consequences. Instructors have discretion to determine the appropriate response based on the University guidelines laid out in the Student Expectations.
|
Points: 28-33
*Follows Turabian guidelines
*No more than 4 errors in general formatting.
*No more than 8 minor errors in punctuation, capitalization or placement for bibliographic entries or in-text citations.
*No more than 3 major errors in formatting of bibliography page or in-text citations.
|
Points: 34-37
*Follows Turabian guidelines
*No more than 3 errors in general formatting.
*No more than 5 minor errors in punctuation, capitalization or placement for bibliographic entries or in-text citations.
*No more than 2 major errors in formatting of bibliography page or in-text citations.
|
Points: 38-42
*Follows Turabian guidelines for formatting in-text citations and bibliography.
*Body of the paper has 1-inch margins.
*Body of the paper has the correct subheadings and matches the Video Summary Example.
*Title page is correctly formatted.
*Page numbers are accurate and properly placed.
*Reference page has the correct title, is a separate page from the rest of the document, and is located at the end.
*Paragraphs are indented ½”, text is double spaced, and 12-point Times New Roman or Calibri is consistent throughout paper.
*In-text citations, for direct quotes, or outside sources, are properly formatted parenthetical citations. Footnotes are not necessary.
*Outside research, if used, is included on the reference page and is properly cited within the text of the paper.
|
|
Reflection
30%
|
Points: 0-27
*Student forgot any of the following:
· Lesson
· Analysis
· recommendation
OR
* analysis is inadequate or recommendation made with no reason (“I liked it” or “It was bad.”)
OR
*50% or more of any paragraph is directly quoted from the video.
OR
*No consideration given for supporting details from videos.
|
Points: 28-33
*Student provides a lesson learned from the video.
*Student attempts analysis of the video but the argument is weak.
*Student provides a recommendation for or against the video but little reasoning.
*No more than 3 direct quotes used in all 3 reflections.
*Some consideration for specific support is given and citations provided.
|
Points: 34-37
*Student provides a lesson learned from the video.
*Student provides a clear analysis of the video with some consideration given to strengths/weaknesses.
*Student provides a recommendation for or against the video with some reasoning.
*No more than 2 direct quotes used in all 3 reflections.
*Supporting examples and details from the video are used and clearly cited.
|
Points: 38-42
*Student provides a lesson learned from the video.
*Student provides a clear analysis of the video with strengths/weaknesses pointed out.
*Student provides a clear recommendation for or against the video with clear reasoning.
*No more than 2 direct quotes used in all 3 reflections.
*Supporting examples and details from the video are used and clearly cited.
|
|
Summary
30%
|
Points: 0- 27
*May include more than one direct quote.
*Summaries fail to include the main purpose/argument of the video.
.
|
Points: 28-33
*May include one direct quote
*Interesting summary, but main purpose or argument is unclear.
|
Points: 34-37
*No direct quotes in any of the summaries.
*Most summaries include the main purpose/argument of the video.
|
Points: 38-42
*No direct quotes in any of the summaries.
*Each summary includes the main purpose/ argument of the video.
|
|
Grammar and Mechanics
5%
|
Points: 0-4
*Errors detract greatly from the overall clarity of understanding
|
Points: 5
*Many minor, or some major errors in grammar, mechanics, language, usage, etc.
|
Points: 6
*Some minor errors in grammar, mechanics, language, usage, etc.
|
Points: 7
*The writing reflects college-level grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.
*Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
*Student wrote in third person only in all summaries.
*No errors in the list above.
*Meets minimum word count (100-250) words per paragraph
*Document was correctly submitted as a Word document attachment.
|
|
Paragraph Organization
And
Development
5%
|
Points: 0-4
*Errors in paragraph unity, clarity of topic sentences, or transitions detract greatly from the overall understanding of the purpose of writing.
|
Points: 5
*Missing at least one topic sentence.
*A few errors in unification or transitions.
|
Points: 6
*Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence.
*Minor errors in unification or transitions.
|
Points: 7
*Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence.
*Each paragraph is unified.
*Transitions are clear and appropriate.
*Each set of paragraphs is properly marked with subheadings.
*Total of 6 paragraphs (2 per video)
|
Juanita la del barrio
video_summary_grading_rubric1.docx
0
