nyanya - can you please do my homework



  

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80- 89% B

Exemplary 90- 100% A

ACC571-A1-1 1. Based on your research, identify and assess the fraud that occurred in the organization and the impact that it has had on the corporation’s investors and creditors. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 20%

0 (0%) - 33.58 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely identified and assessed the fraud that occurred in the organization and the impact it has had on the corporation’s investors and creditors, based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

33.6 (14%) - 38.38 (15.99%)

Partially identified and assessed the fraud that occurred in the organization and the impact it has had on the corporation’s investors and creditors, based on your research. Partially provided support for your rationale.

38.4 (16%) - 43.18 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily identified and assessed the fraud that occurred in the organization and the impact it has had on the corporation’s investors and creditors, based on your research. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

Thoroughly identified and assessed the fraud that occurred in the organization and the impact it has had on the corporation’s investors and creditors, based on your research. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

ACC571-A1-2 2. Suggest how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you researched. Consider the risk factors, the elements of fraud, and the analysis of competing hypotheses. Weight: 20%

0 (0%) - 33.58 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely suggested how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you researched. Did not submit or incompletely considered the risk factors, the elements of fraud, and the analysis of

33.6 (14%) - 38.38 (15.99%)

Partially suggested how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you researched. Partially considered the risk factors, the elements of fraud, and the analysis of competing hypotheses.

38.4 (16%) - 43.18 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily suggested how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you researched. Satisfactorily considered the risk factors, the elements of fraud, and the analysis of competing hypotheses.

43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

Thoroughly suggested how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you researched. Thoroughly considered the risk factors, the elements of fraud, and the analysis of competing hypotheses.

Name: ACC571 Week 2 Assignment 1: Corporate Fraud Schemes

Description: ACC571 Week 2 Assignment 1: Corporate Fraud Schemes ExitExit

Grid View List View

Page 1 of 3Rubric Detail – ACC571008VA016-1176-001

7/12/2017https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup...

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80- 89% B

Exemplary 90- 100% A

competing hypotheses.

ACC571-A1-3 3. Evaluate how teamwork and leadership is an effective tool for financial forensic investigations. Provide support for your evaluation. Weight: 20%

0 (0%) - 33.58 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated how teamwork and leadership is an effective tool for financial forensic investigations. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your evaluation.

33.6 (14%) - 38.38 (15.99%)

Partially evaluated how teamwork and leadership is an effective tool for financial forensic investigations. Partially provided support for your evaluation.

38.4 (16%) - 43.18 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily evaluated how teamwork and leadership is an effective tool for financial forensic investigations. Satisfactorily provided support for your evaluation.

43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

Thoroughly evaluated how teamwork and leadership is an effective tool for financial forensic investigations. Thoroughly provided support for your evaluation.

ACC571-A1-4 4. Assess the role of research in fraud examinations and financial forensics professions. Give your opinion on whether or not fraud examinations and financial forensics professions can have long- term success without continuous research in the field. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 25%

0 (0%) - 41.98 (17.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely assessed the role of research in fraud examinations and financial forensics professions. Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on whether or not fraud examinations and financial forensics professions can have long-term success without continuous research in the field. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

42 (17.5%) - 47.98 (19.99%)

Partially assessed the role of research in fraud examinations and financial forensics professions. Partially gave your opinion on whether or not fraud examinations and financial forensics professions can have long-term success without continuous research in the field. Partially provided support for your rationale.

48 (20%) - 53.98 (22.49%)

Satisfactorily assessed the role of research in fraud examinations and financial forensics professions. Satisfactorily gave your opinion on whether or not fraud examinations and financial forensics professions can have long-term success without continuous research in the field. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

54 (22.5%) - 60 (25%)

Thoroughly assessed the role of research in fraud examinations and financial forensics professions. Thoroughly gave your opinion on whether or not fraud examinations and financial forensics professions can have long-term success without continuous research in the field. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

ACC571-A1-5 5. 3 references Weight: 5%

0 (0%) - 8.38 (3.49%)

8.4 (3.5%) - 9.58 (3.99%)

9.6 (4%) - 10.78 (4.49%)

10.8 (4.5%) - 12 (5%)

Page 2 of 3Rubric Detail – ACC571008VA016-1176-001

7/12/2017https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup...



  

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80- 89% B

Exemplary 90- 100% A

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

ACC571-A1-6 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

0 (0%) - 16.78 (6.99%)

More than 6 errors present

16.8 (7%) - 19.18 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present

19.2 (8%) - 21.58 (8.99%)

3-4 errors present

21.6 (9%) - 24 (10%)

0-2 errors present

Name:ACC571 Week 2 Assignment 1: Corporate Fraud Schemes

Description:ACC571 Week 2 Assignment 1: Corporate Fraud Schemes ExitExit

Page 3 of 3Rubric Detail – ACC571008VA016-1176-001

7/12/2017https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup...