Michael Smith
Adams, M., Blumenfeld, W., Castañeda, R., Hackman, H., Peters, M., & Zúñiga, X. (2013).
Readings for diversity and social justice, 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Critical Consciousness Development Journals (CCDJ) 3 to 5 Pages each 2 due throughout course
In order to deepen your process of learning in this course, I want you to spend some time critically reflecting on
the class discussions and the readings by writing 2 critical analysis papers. These should serve as a log of your
own experiences and critical reactions to the class exercises, discussions, readings and assignments.
These analyses must be based on the readings, class discussion, exercises, and video presentations due for
that section (YOU MUST REFERENCE AT LEAST 3 OF THE READINGS). If you are critical of a
position, present alternative positions and provide evidence for your position. Address how the readings
illuminate an issue. Address how the readings have helped you re-think old ideas or ways of working.
Address questions that have been generated for you and why these questions are important to your practice and
to your life; how you have or could use the ideas in your professional practice or personal life; and how your
thinking is changing given the readings. Discuss implications for social work practice in each analysis. Most
importantly though, this analysis should serve as a way for you to reflect on how your own identities and
knowledge/ experience around oppression/ privilege may be shaping your reactions and learning process.
Do not summarize what is in the readings. The instructor already knows what the readings say. Rather, apply
the readings to your practice and/or to experiences in your life. The important thing to remember is that the
critical analysis allows you an opportunity to reflect upon your experiences, to learn about yourself, and to learn
from others. Critical analyses will be handled in a confidential manner.
These analyses will not be graded for their descriptions of what you are learning (everyone will learn
differently). Instead, they will be graded for their completeness and for their depth of insight and reflection.
The reasons a student might receive an analysis with points deducted are: a) failure to address substantively the
points above; b) poor writing – errors in grammar, spelling, etc.; c) lack of self-reflection; d) merely repeating
content of the readings; e) handing in the analysis late; f) failure to discuss the readings.
Critical analyses will be graded on the quality and depth of your thinking. These analyses must be free of
typographical errors. Margins should be no larger than 1-inch on each side of the page. If referring to readings,
you must use APA style from the American Psychological Association Publication Manual.
***NOTE: THE INSTRUCTOR MAY PERIODICALLY SPECIFY A TOPIC OR QUESTION TO
ADDRESS IN YOUR ANALYSES***
Rubric
1. Response addresses how the readings illuminate an issue (9 points)
a. Response addresses how the readings have helped you re-think old ideas or ways of working (10
points)
2. Response includes questions that have been generated for you and why these questions are important to
your practice and to your life (9 points)
3. Response addresses how you have or could use the ideas in your professional practice or personal life
(18 points)
4. Response discusses implications for social work practice in each analysis (9 points)
5. Response includes analysis that demonstrates a reflection on how your own identities and knowledge/
experience around oppression/ privilege may be shaping your reactions and learning process (12 points)
6. Position stance clearly stated; if you are critical of a position, present alternative stance and provide
evidence for your position (9 points)
7. Submission references at least 3 of the course readings (8 points)
8. Submission does not summarize what is in the readings (8 points)
9. Formatting and Grammar (8 points)
Adams, M., Blumenfeld, W., Castañeda, R., Hackman, H., Peters, M., & Zúñiga, X. (2013).
Readings for diversity and social justice, 3
rd
Ed
. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Critical Consciousness Development Journals (CCDJ)
3 to 5 Pages each 2 due throughout
course
In order to deepen your process of l
earning in this course, I want you to spend some time
critically reflecting on
the class discussions and the readings by writing
2
critical analysis papers. These should serve as
a log of your
own experiences and critical reactions to the class exercises,
discussions, readings and
assignments.
These analyses
must
be
based on the readings, class discussion, exercises, and video
presentations due for
that section
(YOU MUST REFERENCE
AT LEAST 3
OF THE READINGS). If you are
critical of a
position,
present
alter
native positions and provide evidence for your position.
Address
how the
readings
illuminate an issue.
Address
how the readings have helped you re
-
think old ideas or ways of
working.
Address
questions that have been generated for you and why these question
s are important to
your practice and
to your life; how you have or could use the ideas in your professional practice or personal life;
and how your
thinking is changing given the readings.
Discuss
implications for social work practice in each
analysis. Mos
t
importantly though, this analysis should serve as a way for you to
reflect
on how your own
identities and
knowledge/ experience around oppression/ privilege may be shaping your reactions and learning
process.
Do
not
summarize what is in the readings. The
instructor already knows what the readings say.
Rather, apply
the readings to your practice and/or to experiences in your life. The important thing to remember
is that the
critical analysis allows you an opportunity to reflect upon your experiences, to le
arn about
yourself, and to learn
from others. Critical analyses will be handled in a confidential manner.
These analyses will not be graded for their descriptions of what you are learning (everyone will
learn
differently). Instead, they will be graded for
their completeness and for their depth of insight and
reflection.
The reasons a student might receive an analysis with points deducted are: a) failure to address
substantively the
points above; b) poor writing
–
errors in grammar, spelling, etc.; c) lack o
f self
-
reflection; d)
merely repeating
Adams, M., Blumenfeld, W., Castañeda, R., Hackman, H., Peters, M., & Zúñiga, X. (2013).
Readings for diversity and social justice, 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Critical Consciousness Development Journals (CCDJ) 3 to 5 Pages each 2 due throughout
course
In order to deepen your process of learning in this course, I want you to spend some time
critically reflecting on
the class discussions and the readings by writing 2 critical analysis papers. These should serve as
a log of your
own experiences and critical reactions to the class exercises, discussions, readings and
assignments.
These analyses must be based on the readings, class discussion, exercises, and video
presentations due for
that section (YOU MUST REFERENCE AT LEAST 3 OF THE READINGS). If you are
critical of a
position, present alternative positions and provide evidence for your position. Address how the
readings
illuminate an issue. Address how the readings have helped you re-think old ideas or ways of
working.
Address questions that have been generated for you and why these questions are important to
your practice and
to your life; how you have or could use the ideas in your professional practice or personal life;
and how your
thinking is changing given the readings. Discuss implications for social work practice in each
analysis. Most
importantly though, this analysis should serve as a way for you to reflect on how your own
identities and
knowledge/ experience around oppression/ privilege may be shaping your reactions and learning
process.
Do not summarize what is in the readings. The instructor already knows what the readings say.
Rather, apply
the readings to your practice and/or to experiences in your life. The important thing to remember
is that the
critical analysis allows you an opportunity to reflect upon your experiences, to learn about
yourself, and to learn
from others. Critical analyses will be handled in a confidential manner.
These analyses will not be graded for their descriptions of what you are learning (everyone will
learn
differently). Instead, they will be graded for their completeness and for their depth of insight and
reflection.
The reasons a student might receive an analysis with points deducted are: a) failure to address
substantively the
points above; b) poor writing – errors in grammar, spelling, etc.; c) lack of self-reflection; d)
merely repeating