market5
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 2
Introduction
Perreault, Jr., Cannon and McCarthy define place as “making goods and services
available in the right quantities and locations, when customers want them” (2015, p. 262) and
distribution channel as “any series of firms or individuals who participate in the flow of products
from producer to final user or consumer” (2015, p. 263).
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (“Travelers”) offer a wide array of insurance products and
services (The Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015). Travelers strives to provide need-satisfying
insurance products and services to its customers where and when they are desired. Given that
Travelers is a publicly-traded Fortune 500 company with a highly integrated technology-driven
distribution platform for its products, it may appear as though decisions related to place and
distribution channels at Travelers are fairly static. It may also seem that place decisions should
be subordinate to decisions related to the other 3 Ps. However, because place decisions often
have long-running implications, they require the same careful consideration by marketing
managers as decisions regarding the other 3 Ps as they are particularly challenging to change
(Perreault, Jr., Cannon & McCarthy, 2015).
First, this unit will explore place as it relates to Travelers distribution strategy, including
the distribution channels chosen by Travelers and the rationale therefore. Next, this unit will
discuss whether Travelers has a competitive advantage with respect to place based upon its place
decisions as part of its overall distribution strategy.
Place
Place decisions are more complex today than ever. Information technologies have paved
the way for nearly unfettered access to customers in many industries. The property and casualty
insurance industry is one such industry. Today, insurers have their choice of several channels for
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 3
reaching customers. It is important to remember that customers may be part of the same, or
different, target markets and each target market may have varying needs which call for variations
in approach to place decisions (Perreault, Jr., Cannon & McCarthy, 2015). In short, there is no
“one size fits all” in place decisions.
There are several broad place elements, including place and development of channel
systems, distribution, customer service and logistics, retailers, wholesalers, and strategy
planning. Product classes dictate place objectives by virtue of the market exposure needed.
Naturally then, idealistic place objectives should guide place decisions (Perreault, Jr., Cannon &
McCarthy, 2015). For example, a newly developed cyber-crime product for small business
owners may require extensive exposure across a broad geographic market area. Conversely, a
rarely sought, marginally profitable aircraft product may require very little exposure and only in
selective markets. With each product, place objectives must be set accordingly.
Travelers Distribution Strategy
While Travelers may have direct contact with customers, Travelers does not distribute its
products directly to its customers. Rather, Travelers products are sold through independent
agents and brokers. To that end, Travelers boasts more than 12,000 agency locations across the
country (The Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015). However, even among agents and brokers,
Travelers only permits financially strong, experienced agencies to sell its products (The
Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015). Aside from these independently contracted agents and
brokers, there are no other intermediaries involved in getting Travelers products from its rate and
form division at Travelers headquarters in Hartford, Connecticut to the agents and brokers who
ultimately provide them to customers at agency locations across the U.S. Because the products
and services offered by Travelers are not tangible goods, Travelers is relieved of some of the
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 4
more customary place decisions associated with manufactured, tangible goods, such as
transportation, wholesale and retail relations, or the physical facilities and costs associated with
storage or direct distribution, etc. Notwithstanding this, Travelers does share in information
technology delivery investment decisions, in that its technology portal for agents undoubtedly
requires significant financial investment given that it is utilized by all 12,000 agencies (The
Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015).
Travelers provides extensive training to all agents and brokers regarding its products and
operations (The Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015). All agents and brokers are under the
supervision of Travelers field employees and agency performance is regularly reviewed (The
Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015). These agents and brokers are members of Travelers
contractual channel system and share in Travelers product-market commitment, all focusing on
applicable target markets and sharing in critical marketing functions (Perreault, Jr., Cannon &
McCarthy, 2015).
It appears that Travelers uses an intensive distribution approach to achieve ideal market
exposure through its network of more than 12,000 agencies. This approach makes Travelers
broad array of business and personal products available to all customers across the United States
where they buy insurance products from their local independent insurance agent or broker.
Competitive Advantage and Travelers
Competitive advantage exists where the target market perceives that one company’s
marketing mix is superior to another’s mix (Perreault, Jr., Cannon & McCarthy, 2015). It is
clear that Travelers is enjoying a competitive advantage for some lines of business, including, for
example, workers compensation (Harrison, 2014). Moreover, Travelers is the third largest writer
of U.S. personal insurance through independent agents (The Travelers Indemnity Company,
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 5
2015), which ranking implies a competitive advantage attributable to the use of independent
agents versus captive agents and direct response writers. In fact, it was recently reported that
independent agents and brokers continue to dominate property/casualty commercial lines and are
very competitive in the personal lines market when measured against captive carriers and direct
response writers (Insurance Journal, 2015).
As it relates to place decisions, Travelers attributes its competitive advantages to its
delivery of superior products through its cutting-edge technology platforms as well as a strong
and convenient distribution presence with expansive domestic geographic coverage (The
Travelers Indemnity Company, 2015).
With respect to place, Travelers has continued to dominate as a leading property casualty
insurer. However, more and more insurance consumers desire the ability to purchase products
directly (EY GM Limited, 2014). Given this shift, many insurers are leveraging technology to
permit insurance consumers to purchase products directly. For example, direct writer GEICO,
has recently gained a competitive advantage in the auto insurance market. In fact, GEICO has
reportedly overtaken Allstate to become the second largest U.S. auto insurer while agency-
writing Progressive is losing ground in the personal auto insurance market (Insurance Journal,
2013).
GEICO’s experience in the direct-auto insurance market suggests that Travelers
competitive advantage in the personal insurance market may be at risk given the shift in
consumer preference for direct writers. This concept ties back to the notion that within each
product class, variations in approach to place decisions may be required (Perreault, Jr., Cannon
& McCarthy, 2015).
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 6
Closing
In closing, the purpose of this unit was to explore place at it relates to Travelers and to
discuss whether or not Travelers has a competitive advantage attributable to place.
Accordingly, in this unit I explored the various place elements as they relate to Travelers
and provided an extensive review of Travelers distribution channel for its products and services.
In addition, I provided my rationale for Travelers purported competitive advantage in its
respective property casualty markets as they relate to place concepts and contrasted Travelers
competitive advantage to that of a competitor successfully utilizing a direct approach to
distribution in an effort to demonstrate how products classes dictate place objectives and how
place decisions are guided by place objectives.
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 7
References
EY GM Limited. (2014). EY 2015 US property-casualty insurance outlook. Retrieved June 26,
2015, from EY.com: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-2015-us-property-
casualty-insurance-outlook/$FILE/ey-2015-us-property-casualty-insurance-outlook.pdf
Harrison, S. (2014, March 5). Travelers becomes largest U.S. workers comp insurer: NAIC.
Retrieved June 16, 2015, from businessinsurance.com:
http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20140305/NEWS08/140309938&template=rw
d&template=printart
Insurance Journal. (2013, October 22). GEICO Success Highlights Advertising Dollars vs. Agent
Commissions Debate. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from InsuranceJournal.com:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/10/22/308779.htm
Insurance Journal. (2015, March 12). Independent Insurance Agents Defying Doomsayers.
Retrieved July 7, 2015, from InsuranceJournal.com:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/2015/03/12/360268.htm
Perreault, W., Jr., Cannon, J., & McCarthy, J. (2015). Essentials of marketing: A marketing
strategy planning approach (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
The Travelers Indemnity Company. (2015). Travelers at a glance. Retrieved June 9, 2015, from
Travelers.com: https://www.travelers.com/about-us.aspz
The Travelers Indemnity Company. (2015). Travelers Business Insurance. Retrieved June 30,
2015, from Travelers.com: https://www.travelers.com/business-insurance/large-
business/property-insurance/international-property-insurance.aspx
UNIT V RESEARCH PROJECT 8
The Travelers Indemnity Company. (2015). Travelers Agency Prospect Survey. Retrieved July 7,
2015, from Travelers.com: https://lyncagency.travelers.com/LyncAgency/Welcome.aspx